Minsk will repay the debt to Gazprom from the loan received from Russia

258

Despite the difficult situation in the country, in the very near future Belarus will close its debt to Gazprom. Prior to that, Minsk always repaid loans on time, therefore it has a reputation as a reliable borrower.

This was stated by the Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation Anton Siluanov in an interview on the TV channel "Russia 1".



Belarus will repay $ 330 million of Gazprom's debt from the money it will receive this year through the Eurasian Fund for Stabilization and Development (EFSD). The total amount of this loan is $ 500 million.

In addition to 500 million from the EFSD, Minsk will receive the same amount from Russia this year. And next year Moscow will additionally provide Belarus with 500 million dollars. Thus, the total loan amount will be one and a half billion.

Given the excellent reputation of Belarus, the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation is confident in the timely refund of funds.

We think this is a very good borrower.

- said Anton Siluanov.

Earlier, Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin and his Belarusian colleague Roman Golovchenko at the beginning of the month gave instructions to the responsible persons to work out the payments of Minsk this year's debt for natural gas. According to Energy Minister Alexander Novak, the amount of the debt was reconciled and a decision was made to pay it off by the end of September.
258 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -15
    20 September 2020 17: 50
    Overcredited brothers! But they could, like Africa, write off $ 20 billion. But - no, African cannibals are closer and dearer)))
    1. +4
      20 September 2020 17: 53
      Quote: Alvis07
      Overcredited brothers! But they could, like Africa, write off $ 20 billion. But - no, African cannibals are closer and dearer)

      Africa wrote off the money given by the USSR! We would never have returned them.
      1. -4
        20 September 2020 17: 55
        Like $ 3 billion from Yakunovich? So what's the point to step twice on the same rake? Or, will Lukashenka then, from his own money, return everything when he comes to Rostov?
        1. +2
          20 September 2020 17: 57
          Quote: Alvis07
          Like $ 3 billion from Yakunovich?

          Russia was already lending to Yanukovych. And for your information, we have not forgiven Ukraine!
          I want you to learn: the loan is not given to Lukashenka, but to the Belarusian people!
          1. -2
            20 September 2020 17: 57
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            Russia was already lending to Yanukovych. And for your information, we have not forgiven Ukraine!


            ... did not forgive - and returned?
            1. -3
              20 September 2020 18: 00
              Quote: Alvis07
              did not forgive - and returned?

              On this debt, not small percentages run up! And whether Ukraine wants it or not, they will have to repay the debt!
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. +1
                  20 September 2020 18: 02
                  Quote: Alvis07
                  The food is fresh, but it seems to be difficult)

                  Did you break off and dump?
                2. +3
                  20 September 2020 19: 18
                  Quote: Alvis07
                  Fresh food, but pooping - with difficulty)))

                  Well, at least they paraphrased without distorting the rhyme, for example:
                  "Fresh food, but hardly shit."
                  However, only one who thinks clearly and beautifully expresses his thoughts clearly and beautifully.
              2. 0
                20 September 2020 18: 47
                How, if the Western courts do not make such a decision?
                1. -4
                  20 September 2020 19: 13
                  Quote: Kronos
                  How, if the Western courts do not make such a decision?

                  And this must be asked by the English court, which does not know how to get out of the situation into which Ukraine has driven it. Yes
                  1. +1
                    20 September 2020 19: 25
                    The English court does not care about the problems of Russia.
                    1. -5
                      20 September 2020 19: 34
                      Quote: Kronos
                      English court, Russia does not care about problems

                      Excite, how excited! If the English court does not force Ukraine to repay the debt, then the problems will not be with Russia, but with the English court! Yes
                      1. -2
                        20 September 2020 22: 11
                        What exactly are the problems?
                      2. +2
                        20 September 2020 23: 06
                        already Gazprom in court boarded. Take or pay principle. The court said that Ukraine is poor, unhappy, it will be unable to repay the debt. So go with God dear Russians
                      3. +17
                        20 September 2020 23: 41
                        Quote: СРЦ П-15
                        If the English court does not force Ukraine to repay the debt, then the problems will not be with Russia, but with the English court!

                        I am very sorry, but why do you constantly equate Russia and the dolbobeys from Gazpromtyr?
                      4. +1
                        22 September 2020 13: 13
                        Quote: Malyuta
                        Quote: СРЦ П-15
                        If the English court does not force Ukraine to repay the debt, then the problems will not be with Russia, but with the English court!

                        I am very sorry, but why do you constantly equate Russia and the dolbobeys from Gazpromtyr?

                        He does not equate, be careful. It's not about the debt to Gazprom, but about the debt of Russia.
                      5. 0
                        22 September 2020 13: 11
                        Quote: SRC P-15
                        If the English court does not force Ukraine to repay the debt, then the problems will not be with Russia, but with the English court!
                        Most of the forum visitors are not aware of the background, because the outlook is not sufficient. Therefore, you are minus. Don't be offended by them :)
                      6. -2
                        22 September 2020 18: 13
                        Quote: Volder
                        Most of the forum visitors are not aware of the background, because the outlook is not sufficient. Therefore, you are minus. Don't be offended by them :)

                        No, Dmitry, they know, they know! It's just that their task is to convey to readers not the truth, but a replicated lie, to sow doubt in their heads. For the most part, they register on the site with only one task: to show how bad everything is in Russia. I am not offended by them - what can you take from them, it is even impossible to convince them! They sing from someone else's pipe and I would not be surprised if not for free. What can you do - everyone earns as they can. Yes hi
              3. -2
                20 September 2020 19: 06
                What are the percentages? What the fuck are you talking about?
                \
                1. +2
                  20 September 2020 19: 11
                  Quote: Guru
                  What are the percentages? What the fuck are you talking about?

                  Penalty, late payment interest - they're pretty! Yes
                  Googled for fun! Eurobonds are not just debt!
                  1. 0
                    20 September 2020 19: 14
                    Yes, do not care what they will count -What will Dill give us? say Clever or be silent for ever. In fact, what can we? The answer is NOTHING, the Stockholm court is something else. And there is no truth - But the question is - if so, why did they give if they can't take it ??? Say Putenoid
                    1. -6
                      20 September 2020 19: 26
                      Quote: Guru
                      Yes, do not care what they will count -What will Dill give us?

                      Will not give it back in money, we will take it either by the territory, or by factories and gas pipelines! Yes
                      Quote: Guru
                      And there is no truth - But the question is - if so, why did they give if they can't take it ??? Say Putenoid

                      Why did you get crazy, the hair in your beard ran out? There is nothing to conjure? Otherwise you would be Putin ... Ugh! I'm sorry for you Westerners sang along: no matter how hard you try, but it does not work out (and will not work out) according to you, even though you crack! Everything will work out in Belarus and all this opposition riffraff will dump over the cordon. And everything will be fine in Russia, you'll see! tongue
                      1. +2
                        20 September 2020 19: 32
                        Will not give it back in money, we will take it either by the territory, or by factories and gas pipelines!
                        Oh really ? will they give it straight without problems?
                        Putenoid - Get off already :)
                      2. -6
                        20 September 2020 19: 44
                        Quote: Guru
                        Oh really ? will they give it straight without problems?
                        Putenoid - Get off already :)

                        I explain on my fingers: if the English court decides to return the debt to Ukraine, then she will have to give it back, otherwise bankruptcy! And when bankrupt, then first line creditors will come in - these include holders of Eurobonuses, which Russia is. So: Instead of money, these creditors will take either land or property. Russia will also be among them. Ukraine will simply be torn apart!
                        For this I take a bow - I'm hungry, it's time to have supper! Yes
                      3. +4
                        20 September 2020 20: 31
                        Colleagues! I apologize for the incredible blunder I made! I called EUROBONDS Eurobonds. This is due to haste and inattention: too many opponents demanded answers from me to their comments. Therefore, do not judge harshly, lohanulsya, with whom it does not happen! feel
                      4. -1
                        20 September 2020 22: 23
                        And if the English court says not to give, so Ukraine will not give, it turns out
                      5. -2
                        20 September 2020 23: 08
                        and why is she going to give the grandmother. She needs money herself, stop the aggressor
                      6. +16
                        20 September 2020 23: 43
                        Quote: Guru
                        Putenoid - Get off already :)

                        Don't wake him up, don't !!! Let him watch his dreams. Yes
                    2. +9
                      20 September 2020 19: 39
                      And who is this "us", may I ask? The money was given from the NWF, which is deposited in accounts with Western banks, i.e. working for the Western economy, they also returned there. The Russian people are neither cold nor hot from this, this money has already been stolen from him. The current authorities do not intend to spend money on the prosperity of their country. And is this country theirs?
                      1. -1
                        20 September 2020 22: 18
                        Quote: at84432384
                        on accounts in Western banks,

                        what exactly?
                      2. +17
                        20 September 2020 23: 48
                        Quote: poquello
                        what exactly?

                        Like trolled chtol? laughing
                        Well, you are funny, you are such skoloknokvateli.
                        Soon, not only will the FNB get rid of you along with pensions, but also you, along with combat sofas wassat
                      3. +2
                        21 September 2020 00: 00
                        Quote: Malyuta
                        Quote: poquello
                        what exactly?

                        Like trolled chtol? laughing
                        Well, you are funny, you are such skoloknokvateli.

                        trolled it above
                        Quote: at84432384
                        The money was given from the NWF, which is deposited in accounts with Western banks, i.e. working for the western economy,

                        I would like the details of this armored nonsense
          2. +13
            20 September 2020 18: 06
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            I want you to learn: the loan is not given to Lukashenka, but to the Belarusian people!

            Will the Belarusian people manage the loan?
            1. +11
              20 September 2020 18: 08
              Yep, exactly! How the money from the sale of natural resources is managed by the citizens of the Russian Federation)))
              1. +1
                20 September 2020 22: 22
                Quote: Alvis07
                Yep, exactly! How the money from the sale of natural resources is managed by the citizens of the Russian Federation)))

                buy shares of a thread of an oil and gas company and dispose of
            2. +2
              20 September 2020 18: 11
              Quote: shahor
              Will the Belarusian people manage the loan?

              Not! Tihanovskaya from Lithuania! fool
              1. -1
                20 September 2020 18: 12
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                Not! Tihanovskaya from Lithuania!

                But still?
            3. +4
              20 September 2020 19: 47
              In Belarus, it is not customary to build houses on Rublevka and yachts the size of a cruiser using budget money. And the people nowhere and never dispose of budgetary money, for this the state exists. The question is who it serves, its own country and people, or the oligarchs and the West. Judging by the Belarusian social system, the state does not forget its people there.
              1. +4
                20 September 2020 21: 15
                Can you give me some money? To be happy for the social sphere of my family .... of course this is not correct, right? ... it just amazes .. why are people holding a meeting that their social sphere is so good? Look at today's rallies at least .. maybe not everything is so smooth in this kingdom? ...
                1. +7
                  21 September 2020 17: 03
                  Quote: vitvit123
                  Watch today's rallies at least

                  We looked. So what? A bunch of people came out and what they provoke. These are not protesters, they are provocateurs.
                  1. 0
                    21 September 2020 17: 17
                    Well, I saw not a bunch of people, but large clusters .. against a bunch of sense to drive armored vehicles? The resources that convey the picture are different, I think .. I doubt that in all regions, cities, provocateurs ... well, I think you will not throw some money on my social network either? Well, so that I have a social network ...
              2. +1
                20 September 2020 22: 27
                Quote: at84432384
                In Belarus, it is not customary to build houses on Rublevka and yachts the size of a cruiser using budget money.

                if it is about specific people in Russia - name the names, they may be suing you for libel out of boredom, there you will already prove that they are budgetary, and not yelling empty-handed
                1. -2
                  20 September 2020 23: 00
                  Well, if you remember the practice of loans-for-shares auctions and where did the money come from ... And about the fact that the state will never leave people with good faces in trouble, you can not say anything at all, and so everyone understands. laughing
                  1. 0
                    20 September 2020 23: 38
                    Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                    Well, if you remember the practice of loans-for-shares auctions and where did the money come from.

                    it is when?
                    1. -3
                      20 September 2020 23: 41
                      This is in Russia. Welkam.
                      1. +1
                        20 September 2020 23: 45
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        This is in Russia

                        when in terms of date?
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Wellcome.

                        Welkam himself!
                      2. -2
                        20 September 2020 23: 59
                        Quote: poquello
                        when in terms of date?

                        Once upon a time in the 90s.
                        Quote: poquello
                        Welkam himself!

                        Whose kind person will you be? From which kingdom of the state?
                      3. +2
                        21 September 2020 00: 12
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Once upon a time in the 90s.

                        That is, in fact, it is, there was also such a run about Khodorkovsky, whom the bourgeois courts are defending, and he yells as straight today
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        From which kingdom of the state?

                        RF
                      4. -2
                        21 September 2020 00: 18
                        Quote: poquello
                        That is, in fact, it is, there was also such a run about Khodorkovsky, whom the bourgeois courts are defending, and he yells as straight today

                        Well, runs so what?
                        Quote: poquello
                        RF

                        Why then questions about when loans-for-shares auctions? Schoolboy chtol?
                      5. +3
                        21 September 2020 00: 21
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Why then questions about when loans-for-shares auctions?

                        well, if they wrote "loans-for-shares auctions in the 90s" there would be no questions,
                        Quote: poquello
                        and how straight it is today
                      6. 0
                        21 September 2020 00: 29
                        Yes, I somehow forget that time goes by and the bright 90s for many dear Russians are already the history of the ancient world somewhere near the ancient Greeks, Lenin on an armored car and the crusades.
                      7. 0
                        21 September 2020 19: 27
                        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                        Yes, I somehow forget that time goes by and the bright 90s for many dear Russians are already the history of the ancient world somewhere near the ancient Greeks, Lenin on an armored car and the crusades.

                        Well, Greece is not Greece, but Yeltsin's Russia and Putin's Russia are somewhat different
                      8. 0
                        21 September 2020 20: 36
                        It’s even curious, why? More billionaires? Well, is it quantitative, but qualitative?
                      9. 0
                        21 September 2020 21: 43
                        Quote: poquello
                        if it is about specific people in Russia - name the names, they may be suing you for libel out of boredom, there you will already prove that the budget,
              3. -2
                20 September 2020 22: 59
                Quote: at84432384
                And the people nowhere and never dispose of budget money-

                In normal, pardon the expression, democratic countries, the people always manage budget funds through their parliamentary representatives elected in open, transparent and fair elections.
                1. 0
                  20 September 2020 23: 36
                  Quote: shahor
                  Quote: at84432384
                  And the people nowhere and never dispose of budget money-

                  In normal, pardon the expression, democratic countries, the people always manage budget funds through their parliamentary representatives elected in open, transparent and fair elections.

                  in normal, excuse me, developed countries, the people do not engage in such nonsense, there is no need to drive a utopia here about the omnipresent people
                  1. -1
                    21 September 2020 02: 07
                    Quote: poquello
                    ubiquitous people

                    This is you, apparently, about yourself. Do not behave like that in the entrance, even if you drank.
                    1. -1
                      21 September 2020 19: 16
                      Quote: shahor
                      Quote: poquello
                      ubiquitous people

                      This is you, apparently, about yourself. Do not behave like that in the entrance, even if you drank.

                      these are Jewish fairy tales no need to tell about democracy, what for people were forbidden to swim?
              4. -4
                20 September 2020 23: 14
                well yes. In 2019, the European Games were held. 250 greens. Normal, enough dough, we can afford it. True, Soviet deposits were not returned. There is no money in the budget. Teachers are constantly raising money for the needs of the class. Traffic cops in official cars buy rugs and every little thing for their own. A couple of ukhari found bribes to take. We took 200 rubles and sat down
              5. +8
                21 September 2020 17: 02
                Quote: at84432384
                Judging by the Belarusian social system, the state does not forget its people there.

                Unlike us. We have support for the oligarchy above social policy.
              6. 0
                21 September 2020 21: 53
                Quote: at84432384
                In Belarus, it is not customary to build houses on Rublevka and yachts the size of a cruiser using budget money. And the people nowhere and never dispose of budgetary money, for this the state exists. The question is who it serves, its own country and people, or the oligarchs and the West. Judging by the Belarusian social system, the state does not forget its people there.

                What a naive country boy.
                In Belarus, it is even accepted to build schools (https://realty.tut.by/news/building/674317.html) for the children of officials it is not clear for what money (most likely for the money of the general contractor, with the state support of the customer, it is not a problem to pay it at all, the general contractor cannot refuse, he will be jailed). I am 100% sure that salaries and services there are at the expense of the Ministry of Education.
                In general, a house in Drozdy (Belarusian ruble) is bad manners. Now legalized corruption is in full swing - Sanya gives land in the center of Minsk for free, his own office, registered to a friend from the sports team of Sanya, gets a contract. The company has nothing except an office of 5-6 chairs, the office hires a subcontractor with production and equipment (to whom money has not been given for years). Gorgeous. This is the first stage of business, this is Sherkhany. Next come the jackals (all sorts of ministers, deputy chairmen and chairmen of executive committees), they build these apartments (cheaply, of course) and resell them at a real price. And then they can already build a house for themselves. But already far from Belarus.
            4. -1
              20 September 2020 22: 21
              Quote: shahor
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              I want you to learn: the loan is not given to Lukashenka, but to the Belarusian people!

              Will the Belarusian people manage the loan?

              undoubtedly! through the legally elected President Lukashenko A.G.
              1. -1
                20 September 2020 23: 20
                oh, this legally chosen one. For the sake of the people, I'm ready to break myself into a cake. That will come up with a tax on parasites. Then for the admission of the car. And all at the numerous requests of the workers. But the working people will not stop at all. They walk right after them and whine - rygorich, well, think of another tax, otherwise it’s unbearable, money tears your pockets
                1. -1
                  20 September 2020 23: 31
                  Quote: tandem
                  oh, this legally chosen one. For the sake of the people, I am ready to break myself into a cake. That will come up with a tax on parasites.

                  but what do you want it doesn’t happen, the country has no resources, only the industry is reviving, in fact, it is supported by production and our help, there’s half a step to dill - a little push-to break it down, and the dill is far from the bottom
                  1. +18
                    20 September 2020 23: 39
                    Quote: poquello
                    but what do you want it doesn’t happen, the country has no resources, only the industry is reviving, in fact, it is supported by production and our help, there’s half a step to dill - a little push-to break it down, and the dill is far from the bottom

                    But we are great !!! right?
                    1. +4
                      20 September 2020 23: 41
                      Quote: Malyuta
                      But we are great !!! right?

                      we are not just great, we are awesome great, but very humble
                      1. +17
                        20 September 2020 23: 52
                        Quote: poquello
                        we are not just great, we are awesome great, but very humble

                        This cannot be taken away! laughing The biggest yachts, the most fanciful palaces, the most-the most srakets wassat netananalagafworld fellow
                        As in the joke about the hedgehog, who is the smartest, most daring, the most beautiful, only very light laughing laughing laughing
                      2. 0
                        21 September 2020 00: 04
                        Quote: Malyuta
                        This cannot be taken away! laughing The biggest yachts, the most elaborate palaces

                        this is a subjective and civil phenomenon, "do not open your mouth at someone else's gate"
                      3. +18
                        21 September 2020 00: 32
                        Quote: poquello
                        this is a subjective and civil phenomenon, "do not open your mouth at someone else's gate"

                        Since when did the size of yachts and palaces become subjective?
                      4. -1
                        21 September 2020 19: 24
                        Quote: Malyuta
                        Quote: poquello
                        this is a subjective and civil phenomenon, "do not open your mouth at someone else's gate"

                        Since when did the size of yachts and palaces become subjective?

                        with 91 years
                      5. -1
                        21 September 2020 14: 18
                        Why are you so hungry? Well, there are yachts and palaces, so what? This is capitalism, it's time to get used to the fact that there are homeless people and there are nobles and the state will not drag you out of your own swamp. Who is stopping you from making money to snatch something and more, or you lack brains?
                      6. 0
                        21 September 2020 20: 55
                        What about Christian morality? Although what morals do thieves have ... History teaches that it teaches nothing. A hundred years ago, at first, the manors' estates burst into flames, then the nobility went under the knife as a useless and harmful class for the country. This can be repeated now. and not at all because of envy, but as an objective social and economic necessity. The laws of history are unforgiving.
                      7. -1
                        22 September 2020 09: 17
                        That is, from "earn to snatch grab" you chose to steal and not earn =))) and also talk about some kind of morality laughing
                      8. -1
                        22 September 2020 20: 11
                        I chose to "steal" for a simple reason - I can't imagine how you can earn a billion, two, three in our country ... If you know how, share, or give examples. And the median salary in the Russian Federation is 24 rubles. Here you can work day and night. Only Sechin da Miller, with his several million a payday, can somehow still pull, but Force's list is much wider.
                      9. 0
                        23 September 2020 00: 25
                        Quote: at84432384
                        I chose to steal

                        ndya, by the eighth commandment, the Lord God forbids theft, that is, the appropriation in any way of what belongs to others.
                        Quote: at84432384
                        What about Christian morality?

                        ))))))))))))))
                      10. 0
                        23 September 2020 08: 54
                        Start with Forbes annual ratings of 30 successful Russians under 30, pianists, singers, doctors, IT specialists, engineers, venture capitalists, guys under 30 make millions, and you all work for 24000 and whine? You are clearly using the Internet for other purposes
                      11. 0
                        23 September 2020 00: 21
                        Quote: at84432384
                        What about Christian morality?

                        and what's in there? )
                      12. 0
                        23 September 2020 00: 27
                        There is what makes a person different from an insect.
                      13. 0
                        23 September 2020 00: 40
                        Quote: at84432384
                        There is what makes a person different from an insect.

                        oh how, and the "bible" with the "origin of species" not beguiled? )
                      14. 0
                        23 September 2020 00: 42
                        Not lured.
                  2. 0
                    22 September 2020 23: 19
                    the industry is not reviving, but gradually dying out. And resources instead of ice palaces and holidays could be invested in radio electronics and IT
                    1. 0
                      23 September 2020 08: 59
                      Do not touch or invest anything in IT, the less you remember about it, the better. Putin and Mishustin are right now making the right moves from the construction of how you looked at unnecessary quantorium palaces, to tax cuts and the cover of Cypriot tax optimization
                2. -4
                  21 September 2020 03: 07
                  Quote: tandem
                  For the sake of the people, I'm ready to break myself into a cake. That will come up with a tax on parasites. Then for the admission of the car

                  Then the retirement age will raise ¯ \ _ (ツ) _ / ¯
                3. +8
                  21 September 2020 17: 03
                  Quote: tandem
                  Then the tax on parasites will come up

                  Well done! Does the right thing.
                  Quote: tandem
                  But the working people will not stop at all.

                  There are no workers at the meetings. They have no time to engage in nonsense and even more so sell their country to the West.
            5. +6
              21 September 2020 17: 02
              Quote: shahor
              Will the Belarusian people manage the loan?

              The Republic of Belarus in the interests of its citizens.
          3. +9
            20 September 2020 18: 18
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            I want you to learn: the loan is not given to Lukashenka, but to the Belarusian people!

            Well then, the Russian people - the Belarusian people.
            Only some of them. what did you ask others?
            1. -4
              20 September 2020 18: 19
              Quote: atalef
              Well then, the Russian people - the Belarusian people.
              Only some of them. what did you ask others?

              Greetings, Alexander!
              And people in Israel ask you one might think! Yes
              1. +1
                20 September 2020 18: 23
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                And people in Israel ask you one might think!

                In Israel, I tried not to ask ... Now the case is in court.
                1. nnm
                  +3
                  20 September 2020 18: 31
                  Who do you mean? Netanyahu's case is about something else. Maybe you were hinting at someone else?
                  1. +4
                    20 September 2020 18: 37
                    Quote: nnm
                    Netanyahu's case is about something else

                    Netanyahu's case is about this. He violated procedures, including parliamentary. This gave rise to suspicion of corruption in procurement.
                    1. nnm
                      +5
                      20 September 2020 18: 42
                      Ok, since you don't give up right away, let's move on. Let's be more consistent: do you mean 1000,2000 or 4000?
                      I will tell you:
                      In the "case 1000" and "case 2000" the prime minister is charged with fraud and abuse of trust (Article 284 of the Criminal Code), in the "case 4000" he is accused of fraud, abuse of trust and bribery.
                      Choose a case and composition and let's move on.
                      1. -2
                        20 September 2020 18: 56
                        Quote: nnm
                        1000,2000 or 4000?

                        Well, firstly, we are not at war with you to storm and surrender. And the case is about the purchase of submarines. By the way, isn't his number 3000? I do not remember.
                      2. nnm
                        +5
                        20 September 2020 19: 03
                        Quote: shahor
                        Well, firstly, we are not at war with you to storm and surrender.

                        Yes you are right. I agree.

                        But in the case of 3000 (you are right, under this number there is a case for the purchase of boats and submarines) Netanyahu does not pass. Moreover, in February of this year, the police announced his absence as an accused.
                      3. -2
                        20 September 2020 19: 08
                        Quote: nnm
                        Netanyahu does not pass.

                        It means that I have lagged behind life. I'll check it out now. But he passed there!
                    2. +1
                      20 September 2020 18: 52
                      Quote: shahor
                      He violated procedures, including parliamentary.

                      That's right, if the state begins to violate the procedures with impunity, it will inevitably slide towards management like samosa or pinochet.
                    3. +2
                      20 September 2020 22: 32
                      Quote: shahor
                      Quote: nnm
                      Netanyahu's case is about something else

                      Netanyahu's case is about this. He violated procedures, including parliamentary. This gave rise to suspicion of corruption in procurement.

                      oh how, well then they also ask us, so they will put Efremov
              2. -5
                20 September 2020 22: 56
                The people themselves can ask the question. And what is interesting will have to answer. Although, of course, under the conditions of a bourgeois state, even in Israel, wherever the opinion of the bourgeoisie has more weight.
              3. +1
                21 September 2020 07: 05
                Quote: SRC P-15
                Quote: atalef
                Well then, the Russian people - the Belarusian people.
                Only some of them. what did you ask others?

                Greetings, Alexander!
                And people in Israel ask you one might think! Yes

                they don't seem to ask us the same thing, but ...
                all those who do not really ask, are slowly disappearing into political oblivion.
            2. -3
              20 September 2020 19: 06
              And the government does not ask the Jews either. How many times has your Bibi been prosecuted for corruption? And he is still in power.
              1. -2
                20 September 2020 21: 41
                He was not involved .. Cases of corruption were opened against him, but so far they have not been proven in court. But the previous prime minister roamed in places not so distant for 7 years (a little less, for good behavior)
            3. -3
              20 September 2020 22: 51
              You just asked. laughing
          4. -5
            20 September 2020 18: 47
            Did the people ask you about it?
            1. +6
              21 September 2020 17: 04
              Quote: Sentry73
              Did the people ask you about it?

              We were asked by the legitimate authority that the people chose.
          5. +1
            20 September 2020 19: 35
            Quote: SRC P-15
            Quote: Alvis07
            Like $ 3 billion from Yakunovich?

            Russia was already lending to Yanukovych. And for your information, we have not forgiven Ukraine!
            I want you to learn: the loan is not given to Lukashenka, but to the Belarusian people!

            Alas, give Lukashenka ... the people did not ask you for anything.




            1. -3
              20 September 2020 23: 02
              To say that this is a complete paragraph is to say nothing.
          6. +2
            20 September 2020 21: 36
            [quote = СРЦ П-15] I want you to learn: the loan is given not to Lukashenko, but to the Belarusian people!
            [/ Quote

            What a news! The loan was given to Lukashenka. And the Belarusian people will pay for it.
          7. -3
            20 September 2020 23: 02
            well thought out. Credit is taken and spent onion, but the people will give it back!
            1. +6
              21 September 2020 17: 16
              What are you all broadcasting on behalf of the people? Did the people authorize you to represent his interests?
              1. 0
                22 September 2020 23: 24
                What side are you to the people of Belarus? or a godfather for a salary?
        2. nnm
          +4
          20 September 2020 18: 05
          So the appeal for 3 billion is still going on. How did you write them off? The court hearing was scheduled for April, but has been postponed so far due to the virus.
          1. +1
            20 September 2020 18: 10
            Well, from the experience of such cases - you can already forget about that debt. Well, and to you - health, good mood, optimism, stay there! Well, then, about money - you already know)))
            1. nnm
              +4
              20 September 2020 18: 12
              What what what ??? !!! Please provide at least a small sample of court decisions based on the stated "experience"!
              1. +2
                20 September 2020 18: 50
                For example, decisions on gas disputes that were made in favor of Ukraine, decisions in favor of Khodorkovsky on his claim
                1. nnm
                  +6
                  20 September 2020 18: 52
                  Wait. We are talking about a claim for the return of a state loan. where does the dispute between shareholders and the dispute over the price of the contract.
                  You understand that the court's decision for 3 billion is a precedent-setting, because then debtors will be able to safely throw the state - creditors in the courts. And these are not the poorest countries. And oh, how they might not like such a precedent. That is why Russia won the first instance. Therefore, there is no need to talk about the existence of any similar solutions.
                  1. -3
                    20 September 2020 22: 38
                    Only the court itself will decide the compliance with the applicant ...
                  2. -4
                    20 September 2020 23: 25
                    And Kosovo? a use case that cannot be a use case. The Russian Federation will be thrown and will continue to live normally in the legal field
          2. -6
            20 September 2020 19: 09
            Quote: nnm
            So the appeal for 3 billion is still going on. How did you write them off? The court hearing was scheduled for April, but has been postponed so far due to the virus.

            I don’t know how it is with them in Israel, but in Russia it is customary to spend money on friends and not regret the money spent at the household level. And at the state level, the friendship of the Republic of Belarus removes missile launchers 600 km from Moscow. Friendship costs money, and we spend it. Friends are asking for weapons against our sworn partners, and they will receive it.
            1. -4
              20 September 2020 23: 14
              This friend, for your and my money, spawned a bunch of Natsiks and other potential ceevropeans, who almost demolished him. This is the money that could have been spent on solving a bunch of problems in your country, but went to support the Lukashenka regime. He found friends there. Where did you see among the protesting friends? And they are the handiwork of the Bulbaführer. Who cultivated them in opposition to the influence of Russia, fearing for their power and loot. All his construction of the union state is a banal noodle. Nichrome he does not need a union state. He needs our loot and protection. At the same time, at every opportunity, he spits at us and uses completely Western rotten rhetoric.
          3. +6
            20 September 2020 19: 12
            Quote: nnm
            So the appeal for 3 billion is still going on. How did you write them off? The court hearing was scheduled for April, but has been postponed so far due to the virus.
            Small Britain acted as guarantor for three lard, and this money will not go anywhere! And most likely this tranche is insured against all surprises! Even from "force majeure"!
        3. +6
          21 September 2020 17: 01
          Quote: Alvis07
          Or, will Lukashenka then, from his own money, return everything when he comes to Rostov?

          Lukoshenko is not Yanukovych. Lukashenka will not run away like Yanukovych and will not leave the people of Belarus to the mercy of fate.
      2. +8
        20 September 2020 17: 58
        Africa wrote off the money given by the USSR! We would never have returned them.

        And who will return the money to the one who always lends and later forgives, and then lends again?
        And yes, Putin said that Russia is the heir to the USSR, that we take upon ourselves all the debts of the USSR.
        1. -4
          20 September 2020 17: 59
          By the way, yes! But who cares when there are geopolitics and multiple moves?
          1. +5
            21 September 2020 17: 05
            Quote: Alvis07
            But who cares when there are geopolitics and multiple moves?

            You definitely don't care. You only care about lace panties. wink
        2. +2
          20 September 2020 18: 09
          Quote: Jack O'Neill
          And who will return the money to the one who always lends and later forgives, and then lends again?
          And yes, Putin said that Russia is the heir to the USSR, that we take upon ourselves all the debts of the USSR.

          Loans given by Russia, has anyone given back?
          Putin spoke about the debts of the USSR! He did not say anything about the debtors of the USSR!
      3. +3
        20 September 2020 18: 35
        All countries of the world with meat are returned only by us a generous soul at the expense of our population. In Africa there is a lot of things, the same spices, do you take 180 rubles 10 peppers of norms? I do not have much with a salary of 7500, but they could take out on account of the debt.
        1. +3
          20 September 2020 19: 42
          Quote: evgen1221
          There are many things in Africa

          That's right ... There is even:
          Since 2010, the minimum wage in Gabon has become 40% higher than the minimum wage in Russia and remains so. Show the living standards of countries

          https://zen.yandex.ru/media/raznoe/c-2010-goda-minimalnaia-zarplata-v-gabone-stala-na-40-vyshe-chem-mrot-v-rossii-i-ostaetsia-takoi-pokazyvaiu-uroven-jizni-stran-5f6009e68169a878168326c6
        2. +1
          20 September 2020 23: 08
          Quote: evgen1221
          I do not have much with a salary of 7500, but they could take out on account of the debt.

          where did you come from here? some fire wood and yell for all of Russia, others receive 7500 with a minimum of 12 thousand
          1. +4
            21 September 2020 12: 52
            Dear comrade, perhaps a military pensioner, you don’t know in principle and don’t see from your bell tower how others live, but they are. Yes, I live in the small town of Kamen on the Ob, Altai Territory, where the average salary per hand is 7500-8000t on the docks, of course, but 61% of taxes and the factor from Moscow decides a lot. Yes, this is how the whole city lives who do not outbid with a 150% markup. Incredible huh? And we are, we live and survive. I work officially in the bus depot as a mechanic with an absolutely irregular schedule, because they can be pulled out for repairs even at 3 am. It’s still unofficial in the finishing, but it died because of the covid and my wife and child for 7500 at the current prices we have for housing and communal services and other ppk as stressful. My wife works as a cleaner in 3 points of the city unofficially (or in no way) salary per circle 5000. PPC I am the middle class according to the classification of zeroed and generally without a minute bourgeois. Thank God, both parents are pensioners, and in the current conditions this is a guarantee of family survival in the provinces. And yes, in a big city no one is waiting for us and it makes no sense to dump there for a number of reasons. All of the above could say in native Russian, but they will be banned forever.
            1. -1
              21 September 2020 19: 14
              Quote: evgen1221
              in the small town of Kamen on the Ob Altai Territory where the average salary on hand is 7500-8000t

              fuck you, but choose the governor and other local people?
              1. +2
                21 September 2020 19: 23
                The mayor of the city, according to a certificate from a durka, dumped the city with millions of dollars in debt, the governor even came for debriefing - a storm storm was made as much as 2 km, despite the fact that the asphalt is like after mortars, but there is no money for it. Wait, there is no head in the city, and the deputies from the commerce and for show do not attend meetings, and that is not why they came to power. The population of nigram no longer believes any authorities and has nothing to do with it.
                1. 0
                  21 September 2020 19: 34
                  Quote: evgen1221
                  The mayor of the city, according to a certificate from a durka, dumped the city with millions of dollars in debt, the governor even came for debriefing - a storm storm was made as much as 2 km, despite the fact that the asphalt is like after mortars, but there is no money for it.

                  ndya, it is unclear how with such an ass on his territory the governor has an average rating, I sympathize
            2. 0
              22 September 2020 23: 28
              and you do not consider the option of work on watch?
              1. 0
                23 September 2020 03: 54
                health in the north nc allows you to mate. Yes, and money for the first time is still needed and the dumbness of 15 tons. As I said, there are several reasons and others that do not allow long distance travel. Don't think that I'm crying, just explaining to my friend what and how in the outback, residents survive, and not all of them with over 30t income. A garden, a vegetable garden and a husband for an hour help flutter if their hands grow correctly, But objectively, life is becoming more difficult every year, but these are questions for the government on another planet.
      4. +2
        20 September 2020 18: 38
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        We would never have returned them.

        Where did you get such confidence? Even the pro-Putin Starikov explains the benefits the creditor receives from the debtor's state. Remember - Ceausescu decided to throw off the debt burden from Romania, and they gave him a maidan and a quick execution.
        Debtors always depend on who they owe. By forgiving debts, we gave up leverage.
        1. +1
          20 September 2020 18: 53
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          Debtors always depend on who they owe. By forgiving debts, we gave up leverage.

          You may be right, but unfortunately, we do not know all the nuances of making decisions on writing off debts to African countries.
          1. +1
            20 September 2020 20: 00
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            do not know all the nuances of making decisions on writing off debts

            Right. In addition to money, governments have many ways to recover debt.
            1. -2
              20 September 2020 20: 02
              Quote: Ded_Mazay
              In addition to money, governments have many ways to recover debt.

              Please list.
              1. +2
                20 September 2020 20: 03
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                Please list.

                Look for yourself. You know how to write comments, and you can handle Yandex.
                1. -1
                  21 September 2020 09: 32
                  As I thought, there are zero arguments! good
                  1. +1
                    21 September 2020 10: 09
                    There is only one argument - an acute unwillingness to encourage your graphomania.
                    Moreover, everything has already been written about below, but you are probably out of sight.
                    Quote: URAL72
                    And debt cancellation was always carried out in conjunction with the conclusion of lucrative contracts - the construction of infrastructure, mining, etc.
                    1. -1
                      21 September 2020 13: 04
                      Quote: Ded_Mazay
                      Moreover, everything has already been written about below, but you are probably out of sight.

                      And here it is more interesting - contracts of which companies, private or state? What is the profit as a result?
                      1. 0
                        21 September 2020 14: 22
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Look for yourself. You know how to write comments, and you can handle Yandex.
                      2. -1
                        21 September 2020 15: 08
                        Blah as usual. What contracts can cover the write-off of Cuba? They are absent from the word at all. Contracts in Iraq don't even come close to writing off debts. The same in Vietnam. Afghanistan generally smokes on the sidelines. As well as the mind of an opponent sending to Yandex instead of a response. wink
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. 0
                        21 September 2020 20: 40
                        Check out which contracts are relevant in Iraq now.
                      5. 0
                        21 September 2020 21: 45
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        Check out which contracts are relevant in Iraq now.

                        are these irrelevant? I just don't know
          2. 0
            23 September 2020 00: 38
            We do not know everyone, but we know the main one - corruption.
      5. +2
        20 September 2020 19: 37
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        Africa wrote off the money given by the USSR! We would never have returned them.

        Why not say honestly that the depersonalized money of the Soviet people was written off to Africa ... Who should they return it to? Those who didn’t have time to bent over Sberbank depositors? Or give to sick children; to parents who collect "from the world" 12 million for the operation of their daughter?
        And here is specific real money boys shareholders of GAZPROM ... Or does someone have their own views on them? Yes, you dreamers ...
        1. +3
          21 September 2020 01: 17
          In general, this $ 300 million is the money of everyone who works at Gazprom and shareholders in Russia and the world, since all supply services were performed for this money.
          1. -2
            21 September 2020 04: 43
            Quote: Vadim237
            Actually, this $ 300 million is the money of everyone who works at Gazprom.

            In childhood, it was not necessary to smoke the Primer, but to watch cartoons:

            Let's not talk about everyone who works at Gazprom, shareholders in Russia and on a global scale, but just focus on "effective managers" ... Yes They own all the profits, where on the board of directors they "attach hands and feet to it (profits)." And here you are sowing the unreasonable, evil and transient. You are trying to explain to us that Gazprom's losses are the losses of these managers ...
            laughing
    2. +4
      20 September 2020 18: 08
      It was easier to immediately transfer this money into the bottomless abyss of Gazprom.
      1. +1
        20 September 2020 18: 12
        Well, it could have been done that way, but it's somehow too simple and stupid. But with a government loan - to help out the private company "Gazprom" - this is very, very much!
      2. -1
        20 September 2020 18: 22
        It was easier to immediately transfer this money into the bottomless abyss of Gazprom.


        You can't. Too obvious shifting from the public pocket to the private one. Have you forgotten that Gazprom is only half popular? wink
        And so it seems that decency is fully observed. Everyone is happy, and even Madame Luzhkov-Baturina with her little thing in the form of 1% of the "national heritage".

        Okay, nonsense. After all, Americans have always loved to give tied loans. The same "Marshall plan" of aid to Europe. We give you money, but you can buy goods only from us.
      3. +1
        20 September 2020 18: 55
        Quote: Deniska999
        It was easier to immediately transfer this money into the bottomless abyss of Gazprom.

        Some banks (among them, in fact, the Russian Belgazprombank) would not have received a margin, and their "top management" would not receive full bonuses. Most of both will go to Russia, more precisely, Russian ...
        1. -1
          20 September 2020 23: 30
          forget about Belgazprombank. He's not yours anymore
    3. -3
      20 September 2020 20: 23
      Quote: Alvis07
      Overcredited brothers! But they could, like Africa, write off $ 20 billion. But - no, African cannibals are closer and dearer)))

      I wonder who walks on your day ...

      these


      Or
      1. -3
        20 September 2020 20: 25
        Quote: Skalendarka
        Quote: Alvis07
        Overcredited brothers! But they could, like Africa, write off $ 20 billion. But - no, African cannibals are closer and dearer)))

        I wonder who walks on your day ...

        these


        Or



    4. 0
      20 September 2020 20: 39
      to issue a loan - to issue and resell to the Chinese. they will work as a brother for Luke
  2. -10
    20 September 2020 17: 55
    And who shouted from Belarus does not return loans?
    1. +9
      20 September 2020 18: 09
      Quote: Nastia Makarova
      Belarus not returning loans?

      Belarus always returns loans ... at the expense of a new loan. So we walk in circles ...
      1. -6
        20 September 2020 18: 13
        So most of the countries in the world who are credited
        1. +1
          20 September 2020 18: 17
          [/ Quote]
          [quote = Nastia Makarova] credited [/ quote]
          Nastenka, you have two mistakes in one word. You would have learned Russian. And then let's talk about international loans. Good?
          1. -9
            20 September 2020 18: 26
            Quote: shahor
            Nastenka, you have two mistakes in one word. You would have learned Russian. And then let's talk about international loans. Good?

            It is not appropriate for a girl to point out her mistakes. You would have learned a little culture of communication! Liberast or what?
            1. +1
              20 September 2020 18: 28
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              You would have learned a little culture of communication!

              Does an uncultured girl offer me to study culture? However...
              1. -5
                20 September 2020 18: 30
                Quote: shahor
                Does an uncultured girl offer me to study culture? However...

                Are you kind of kidding me now?
                1. +5
                  20 September 2020 18: 34
                  Quote: СРЦ П-15
                  Are you kind of kidding me now?

                  First, do not poke - you drank with someone else in the morning on brotherhood. And as for the joke, no, I wasn't joking. It hurts the ear when patriots distort the language of the country in which they live.
                  1. -7
                    20 September 2020 18: 37
                    Quote: shahor
                    First, do not poke - you drank with someone else in the morning on brotherhood. And as for the joke, no, I wasn't joking. It hurts the ear when patriots distort the language of the country in which they live.

                    You insulted me by calling me a girl! Do you catch the meaning of your comments? It was I who suggested that you learn the culture of communication, not Nastya!
                    It is clear that it is not customary to apologize in Israel.
                    1. +2
                      20 September 2020 18: 51
                      Quote: СРЦ П-15
                      It is clear that it is not customary to apologize in Israel.

                      Actually, I was born, raised and live in Moscow. Your offer is rejected - doctor, heal yourself! And I would recommend Nastya to study the textbook of one of the best Russian philologists - Rosenthal. This textbook in the USSR, when I was studying, was considered the best.
                      1. -5
                        20 September 2020 19: 01
                        Quote: shahor
                        And I would recommend Nastya to study the textbook of one of the best Russian philologists - Rosenthal. This textbook in the USSR, when I was studying, was considered the best.

                        Yeah! I was not mistaken - you are from Israel! Still can't you get away from celebrating your New Year?
                      2. 0
                        20 September 2020 19: 05
                        Quote: СРЦ П-15
                        Yeah! I was not mistaken - you are from Israel!

                        Nooo! I'm with Filia! And if I were from Israel, you have to poke? You are our hunter!
                      3. -12
                        20 September 2020 19: 40
                        Quote: shahor
                        Quote: СРЦ П-15
                        It is clear that it is not customary to apologize in Israel.

                        Actually, I was born, raised and live in Moscow. Your offer is rejected - doctor, heal yourself! And I would recommend Nastya to study the textbook of one of the best Russian philologists - Rosenthal. This textbook in the USSR, when I was studying, was considered the best.

                        Rosenthal ???, Russian? -Kasher tunnels or raised in a kibbutz ????
                        Well, I don't understand you Russians ...
                      4. -5
                        20 September 2020 23: 05
                        Quote: Skalendarka
                        Rosenthal ???, Russian? -Kasher tunnels or raised in a kibbutz ????
                        Well, I don't understand you Russians ...

                        It's high time, e ... mother, to understand Russia with the mind - I. Guberman, Gariki
              2. -2
                20 September 2020 23: 22
                Quote: shahor
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                You would have learned a little culture of communication!

                Does an uncultured girl offer me to study culture? However...

                She has a beautiful avatar, you can forgive ... probably ...
                1. -4
                  21 September 2020 02: 11
                  Quote: Lara Croft
                  She has a beautiful avatar, you can forgive ... probably ...

                  Why should I forgive her? It's not her fault, it's her trouble. I feel sorry for her.
            2. +3
              20 September 2020 18: 51
              Why is it for a person not to point out errors culturally?
          2. -2
            20 September 2020 18: 43
            Quote: shahor
            you have two mistakes in one word. You would have learned Russian.

            The standard trick of boorish trolls is to discuss not the essence of the comment, but spelling mistakes, which were most likely made when typing from the phone. negative
            1. -4
              20 September 2020 21: 25
              Hi ... Ingvar 72 I even made mistakes on purpose .. I was always amused when they started to write to me about the 10th grader, the boy, and read a lot of taunts to myself .. then I communicated with pleasure in personal correspondence and enjoyed the fact that a person clearly understood that he was wrong. By this I tried to show clearly some aspects of our perception ...
              Again a sore subject ... (with a smile) ..
            2. 0
              20 September 2020 23: 28
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Quote: shahor
              you have two mistakes in one word. You would have learned Russian.

              The standard trick of boorish trolls is to discuss not the essence of the comment, but spelling mistakes, which were most likely made when typing from the phone. negative

              You are not right. Such a troll is called:
              Pedantic Grammar Troll. Regardless of what the discussion is about, the Pedantic Grammar Troll ignores the arguments and chooses one word that you misspelled.

              18 varieties. Be kind ...
              https://sarafan.biz/?p=1290
            3. -1
              21 September 2020 10: 15
              that's right, I wrote from the phone))))
          3. +4
            20 September 2020 19: 03
            Quote: shahor
            Quote: Nastia Makarova
            credited

            Nastenka, you have two mistakes in one word. You would have learned Russian.

            Something I saw only one.
            The second is on your conscience or literacy. hi
            1. 0
              20 September 2020 19: 42
              Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke
              Quote: shahor
              Quote: Nastia Makarova
              credited

              Nastenka, you have two mistakes in one word. You would have learned Russian.

              Something I saw only one.
              The second is on your conscience or literacy. hi

              Steals away from the word steal, that's right ...
          4. -2
            21 September 2020 10: 16
            I wrote from the phone
        2. +2
          20 September 2020 19: 23
          Quote: Nastia Makarova
          So most of the countries in the world who are credited
          Especially at the IMF! There at the very bottom it is written in small print: Debtor forever!
      2. -1
        20 September 2020 21: 30
        I've already written this to him several times! But there is an opponent in the tank and the armor is strong!
        There was recently an article that Minsk owes us 7,5 billion dollars .. so there is a good debt, how much they will return it .... I think if the current is returned at our expense!
    2. -3
      20 September 2020 21: 21
      I wrote, but I didn't yell! Follow the words! Once again I tell you, give me always more credit than I will give you! I'm all for it ! You give me 100000, I'll give you 20000 rubles ... I will always take from you! Throw off the card number ...
      1. -5
        21 September 2020 10: 19
        no, it was shouting))) the refunding always happens like that, they take a new loan to pay the interest
        1. 0
          21 September 2020 11: 39
          You know I had doubts about your adequacy and perception of the world ... so I better finish, but only one question, where did you come to the conclusion that I was yelling? You are welcome....
        2. 0
          21 September 2020 11: 52
          And, excuse the importunity, are you a man or a woman? This is still important in our dispute ..
          1. -2
            21 September 2020 14: 49
            but is it not visible ????
            1. -1
              21 September 2020 17: 21
              If it doesn't bother you, answer the second question so that the full picture is drawn ... ATP ..
              1. -5
                21 September 2020 17: 51
                I will not answer you anything
                1. 0
                  21 September 2020 19: 32
                  Thank ...
  3. 0
    20 September 2020 17: 55
    I hope it's worth it, Old Man will hold on, will not let you down. Gazprom lives too well without these millions.
  4. nnm
    +7
    20 September 2020 18: 03
    What an "unusual" variant of transferring public money. And then Gazprom again will not fulfill the requirements of the government decree and will not pay at least 50% to the budget. But they suggested a topic for another article - "how the oil and gas sector of Russia" pays "income tax to the country's budget"))))
  5. 0
    20 September 2020 18: 06
    It seems to me that simply, the debts of Belarus to the company "Gazprom" ... were bought by the Russian government, however, it is not clear why. The fact that Gazprom was again rescued is understandable, but couldn't the money just be spent on the needs of people in the Russian Federation? As profit - so to Gazprom, as losses - so to the people.
    1. nnm
      0
      20 September 2020 18: 10
      How can you "outbid" by increasing the loan amount? If it was a subsequent write-off - yes. But this is not the case here.
    2. -3
      20 September 2020 23: 29
      Quote: Alvis07
      As profit - so to Gazprom, as losses - so to the people.

      You have discovered the ancient secret of effective capitalist management. Congratulations.
    3. +2
      21 September 2020 01: 13
      It is spent on people in the Russian Federation
  6. -1
    20 September 2020 18: 11
    If someone needs the Belarusian Air Force to accompany the B52.
    If you need launchers directly on our border.
    If you need Natsiks on the territory of Belarus, killing children for putting on the St. George's ribbon.
    Then yes, you can tolerate everyone on this forum who are convinced of the need to spend on other purposes and not on the support of our allies.
    Subjects advocating the refusal to create and maintain the sphere of influence of Russia in the world.
    Then support the condemnation of aid to Belarus.
    Feed these trolls.

    For me personally.
    The people of the Republic of Belarus are not Lukashenka and his family.
    The people of Belarus are our family.
    And we must fight for each other to the last.
    Both to the last cartridge and to the last ruble.
    Separately, we will not achieve anything, and we will not survive.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. -2
        20 September 2020 18: 52
        No, the loan will support the economy of Belarus.
      2. -6
        20 September 2020 19: 11
        NOT dear blue Elvis Presley! Politics is the concentrated content of economics. Remember this. Belarus, soon or not, will be part of Russia. We are one people. So take this loan as a subsidy to the region, Chukotka, for example. For 9 months a year I sit in trenches for 23 thousand rubles, and I do not complain. You are sitting at a computer with the Internet, which means you are not in a TV box, and whine. A person needs a lot less than you want, believe me. And debt cancellation was always carried out in conjunction with the conclusion of lucrative contracts - the construction of infrastructure, mining, etc.
        1. +1
          20 September 2020 19: 27
          A person can live in terrible conditions, only this is not something to strive for.
        2. -4
          20 September 2020 19: 40
          A trench for shooting
          standing on a horse !? belay
          And so nine months !? belay
          Meehan ....?!?!?
          1. -2
            20 September 2020 19: 52
            Not Meehan. My call sign is Politruk. Battalion Intelligence Sergeant.

            Somewhere near Dokuchaevsk ...
        3. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        20 September 2020 19: 16
        Quote: Alvis07
        Stop writing nonsense! If you are already drinking, then have a snack! Economics is one thing, politics is another, and propaganda is third! Because of such limited-minded people like you, Russia is languishing in poverty. Stop shaming yourself! This loan is supported specifically by Lukashenka and the private company Gazprom, at your expense. And the people of Belarus do not need him.

        In the USSR, the subject was Political Economy. Do you think it does not exist because it is not spelled out in your training manuals?
        1. -1
          20 September 2020 20: 28
          In the USSR, the subject was Political Economy
          There was no such subject in the USSR.
          1. +2
            20 September 2020 22: 12
            Judging by the disadvantages, it was not only Borodach who studied "political economy".
            Normal students in the USSR studied political economy, moreover not simple, but Marxist-Leninist.
        2. 0
          20 September 2020 21: 55
          Quote: Bearded
          in your crush training manuals?

          Okay, I'll go re-read my training manual. I slept so stupidly.
    2. -2
      20 September 2020 19: 10
      Livonetc (Gennady)
      Today, 18: 11

      I agree completely.
      I could, - I added each phrase. hi
    3. +2
      20 September 2020 19: 59
      Quote: Livonetc
      And we must fight for each other to the last.

      We should not fight for each other (with whom should we fight? With the muzzled Miller and Co.?), But build a real union state based on respect for the sovereignty of each country and on making concessions to each other, for the development of the economies of our countries, for the improvement of the well-being of our peoples ...
      Together we must learn to live, create and build, not divide. give and rewrite ...
      I was always surprised by this "grief" about the reconstruction of loans to the fraternal people. It is necessary to take off the last Belarusian embroidered shirt in order to dress the “naked Russian oligarchs” ...
    4. -4
      20 September 2020 23: 31
      Quote: Livonetc
      The people of Belarus are our family.

      It's time for you to get rid of your illusions. Under capitalism, there is no brotherhood of peoples. There is only economic benefit.
  7. 0
    20 September 2020 18: 37
    Well, Russia, as always, is a generous soul. It is cheaper to drive in a tank and proclaim the Belarusian region.
    1. +10
      20 September 2020 18: 42
      Yes Yes!
      Meanwhile, the number of Russians whose income is below the subsistence level increased by 1.3 million in the second quarter of this year and amounted to 19.9 million. In the same period last year, the number of poor Russians was 18.6 million.

      https://dailymoscow.ru/news/chislo-bednyh-rossiyan-vyroslo-do-19-9-mln-chelovek

      However:
      1. +7
        21 September 2020 17: 11
        Quote: Alvis07
        meanwhile, the number of Russians whose income is below the subsistence level has increased

        Do you want this to happen in Belarus?
    2. +7
      21 September 2020 17: 13
      Quote: evgen1221
      It is cheaper to drive in a tank and proclaim the Belarusian region.

      We need to unite into a single Union State.
  8. -11
    20 September 2020 18: 44
    With Batka, everything is fine. Coming, driving the protestors. He will be dull like in a tank. He is working on not only a monetary loan, but a credit of trust. Today he drives protestors on weekends. And from Monday he will start working on Europe, especially concerned about the fate of the Belarusian people. We are waiting for Monday. ! good
  9. +2
    20 September 2020 19: 28
    All this is bad, the debt must be returned because it is a debt! And now the dad is winning back, earning bonuses.
  10. 0
    20 September 2020 19: 45
    I hope the ministry has calculated all the nuances ... don't put a finger in these guys' mouths ...
    1. +1
      20 September 2020 19: 48
      You confused the Russian government with the collectors! This is to collectors - don't put a finger in your mouth, if your loan is overdue - your kidneys will be beaten off. And the Russian government will forgive and write off everything ... at your expense))
      1. 0
        20 September 2020 22: 27
        Oh well. With the collectors you have overdone them in Russia, the slightest movement against the law in the direction of the borrower ends badly for them. Only through the courts. Tell your children tales about terrible collectors in Russia at night.
      2. 0
        21 September 2020 20: 19
        Quote: Alvis07
        And the Russian government will forgive and write off everything ... at your expense))

        ))))) gyyy, the government has enough money without my account
    2. +7
      21 September 2020 17: 10
      Quote: Alien From
      I hope the ministry has calculated all the nuances

      Here I disagree with you. In our ministry, they cannot calculate all the nuances. If we could, we would never have crises.
  11. +3
    20 September 2020 19: 53
    Why does the Russian Federation need this ?! No money, let them pay with land, enterprises.
    1. -2
      20 September 2020 20: 35
      Quote: Shadow041
      Why does the Russian Federation need this ?!

      There is no need to cast a shadow over the fence. The second name of the Russian Federation is Russia. Belarus is also Russia. This obliges the Russian Federation to something.
      Quote: Shadow041
      let them pay in land, enterprises

      Who? (Names, passwords, appearances ..) Besides, in a couple of months all businesses will be worth nothing. In the period of the collapse of the economic order, the questions of the old economy are in the thirty-tenth place. The main thing is to survive. Without the union of the Russian Federation, Ukraine and Belarus, Russia will not exist. Although modern ideologists cannot recognize this position. But that's their problem. Ideology will also be different.
      1. 0
        20 September 2020 23: 51
        Quote: iouris
        Quote: Shadow041
        Why does the Russian Federation need this ?!

        Belarus is also Russia.

        From which moment?
        Belarus is also Russia.
        from the moment the RB received a loan from the RF or the RB returned the RF loan? Check pzhl ...
        Without the union of the Russian Federation, Ukraine and Belarus, Russia will not exist.

        Yes, Russia somehow has been living for almost 30 years without Ukraine and Belarus and nothing has disappeared ...
        Don't worry, the Russian Federation will live for thousands of years without Belarus and Ukraine ...
        What does it mean that the Russian Federation paid off the entire debt of the USSR alone, and after that, it should also lend money to those for whom it paid off?
        There, "fraternal" Ukrainian and Belarusian peoples, do not want to lend the Russian Federation at low interest rates with the possibility of refinancing, no? Are they fraternal peoples .... or are they fraternal only when they act as Borrowers?
        1. -3
          21 September 2020 10: 54
          Quote: Lara Croft
          Yes, Russia somehow has been living for almost 30 years without Ukraine and Belarus and nothing has disappeared ...

          Russia is a territorially divided country. "They" are not "brotherly peoples", but one divided people. Almost all regional governments of the Russian Federation act as "borrowers". The IMF acts as the "creditor" and the Fed is the regulator.
          Is this life?
      2. +2
        21 September 2020 14: 16
        That's when the Republic of Belarus will become part of the Russian Federation, if it does, then make such statements, but for now the Republic of Belarus is an independent state, not a part of the Russian Federation, this is a foreign state that even Crimea does not recognize as part of the Russian Federation, and there are a lot of you here to spend money of the Russian Federation on foreign countries amateurs who come to Russia from abroad ...
    2. -1
      20 September 2020 20: 52
      Quote: Shadow041
      No money, let them pay with land, enterprises.

      Who should be paid with land and enterprises?
      Russian bourgeoisie for a song?
      Or modern Russia as a state? So the state will give for a penny to our same bourgeoisie for tearing and ruining.
      So the Western bourgeoisie will give you more for a buck or two and will just ditch it.
      They will pay extra for placing their bases.
      You need it?
      1. 0
        21 September 2020 01: 09
        Some Belarusian enterprises are one hell of a loss - but they will never be unprofitable forever. Someday they will have to be optimized and generally closed and opened new modern ones that meet all the requirements of the current market realities.
        1. -1
          21 September 2020 01: 25
          Quote: Vadim237
          Some Belarusian enterprises are one hell of a loss - but they will never be unprofitable forever. Someday they will have to be optimized and generally closed and opened new modern ones that meet all the requirements of the current market realities.

          "Market realities" - something ephemeral from frostbitten market people, their idol.
          According to Gaidaro-Chubais: ~ "Well, N million will not fit into the market - let them die!"
          And, yes, we see: N million did not fit in - they left prematurely.
          In all post-Soviet countries, they sharply bowed to the idol.

          PS Try to ponder the ratio of unprofitability in relation to the "owner" and unprofitability in relation to society as a whole, that is, "in a circle". hi
        2. -1
          21 September 2020 14: 05
          This all applies to Russian enterprises too.
  12. -2
    20 September 2020 20: 26
    Quote: Alvis07
    Overcredited brothers! But they could, like Africa, write off $ 20 billion. But - no, African cannibals are closer and dearer)))

    This is a claim to Leonid Ilyich laughing
    1. +7
      21 September 2020 17: 08
      Quote: Gennady Fomkin
      This is a claim to Leonid Ilyich

      What does Leonid Ilyich have to do with it? It is not his fault that we cannot collect debts from African countries.
  13. 0
    20 September 2020 20: 33
    Eh ... I should live like this ... laughing

    You come to the bank ... you take out a loan ... it's time to give it back - you come to the bank ... you are given a new loan to pay off the old one ... and so on in a circle ...

    la-po-ta !!! good tongue laughing
    1. -1
      20 September 2020 22: 31
      Up to 500 thousand you go bankrupt through the MFC.Lapota. good drinks tongue
      1. -3
        20 September 2020 22: 38
        Quote: tralflot1832
        Up to 500 thousand you go bankrupt through the MFC.Lapota. good drinks tongue

        What does bankruptcy have to do with it ?! am belay feel

        Lukashenka after all - judging by the article - "responsible borrower" good After all, he is always given loans to pay off previous loans - he would not suffer from his "credit history" bully
        1. 0
          20 September 2020 22: 46
          The dizziness from Europe and success has probably passed. He has something to sell besides shrimp and Polish apples. From Monday we will see if he will cross the point of no return in relations with Europe. good
          1. -2
            20 September 2020 23: 12
            Quote: tralflot1832
            The dizziness from Europe and success has probably passed. He has something to sell besides shrimp and Polish apples. From Monday we will see if he will cross the point of no return in relations with Europe. good

            And what exactly should be on Monday? ... sorry, I don't know ... feel
            1. -1
              20 September 2020 23: 28
              After Friday's statements by the Foreign Ministry in Belarus, Europe had time to think ... They will continue in the same way. In Germany, there are already sober voices about Lukashenko. They will not stop, it is beneficial for us. laughing
    2. -2
      21 September 2020 10: 23
      so many do)))) only a new loan is taken from another bank
  14. -1
    20 September 2020 20: 35
    Quote: Alvis07
    You confused the Russian government with the collectors! This is to collectors - don't put a finger in your mouth, if your loan is overdue - your kidneys will be beaten off. And the Russian government will forgive and write off everything ... at your expense))

    You haven’t seen a Russian with a calculator yet. I’m writing: RB interprets the treaties as it pleases (hoping to outwit everyone), and tells its subjects about the evil Kremlin imperialists; laughing come on, I'll tell you how life works.

    1. If you do not like the contract, you do not sign it.

    2. If you signed it, you execute it before the expiration date.

    3. If suddenly (!) You don't like the contract so much that you cannot eat, then:

    a) you immediately stop receiving the goods.

    b) pay for what you have already received

    c) only after that do you start asking for something and agreeing on new terms.

    d) if you can't come to an agreement, you go and buy in another place.

    4. You DO NOT do what 404 does, and now RB does: you continue to receive the goods, but pay for it as much as you think is "fair." at the same time, you make your mug a brick and muddle: "What exactly is the loop in the requirement to provide a method for determining the calorific value of gas on the side of Gazprom?"

    all clear? any questions?

    come on, I’ll tell you something else, I’ll predict more precisely: the Republic of Belarus will NEVER buy energy resources either from Kazakhstan, or from Azerbaijan, or, moreover, from Norway, Qatar or the United States. can you guess why? correct, because it's about double the price.

    RB will continue to try to rattle Russian energy resources as far as Russia will allow. at the same time muddle and complain.

    also, the Republic of Belarus will never leave either the EAEU or the SG of its own free will. now you guess the reason?

    It is curious that the citizens of the Republic of Belarus are satisfied with this, otherwise they would not have voted for the project of the Republic of Belarus.
  15. 0
    20 September 2020 20: 36
    If Russia wants to feed daddy, let him feed him. Unprofitable factories will burn this money in 3 months and ask for more.
    1. +1
      20 September 2020 21: 50
      You can not give money to dad, only after 5-6 months of Sunday walks there will be victims, there will be Belarusian Yatsenyuk and Yaroshi, and there will be a lot of money for all this abomination. Here, not only money must be given ... as if not to pro-host Belarus. Everything is played from defense (maybe right). Here's an example, right next to Rostov. Well, it will be with Smolensk, we will harness it for a long time.
      1. +1
        20 September 2020 22: 17
        Everywhere you see Ukraine. And the fact that it was Lukashenka who got the people, you don't want to see. I could have nominated one of my ministers instead of myself for the elections and there would not have been all this kipish. But how can one give up power?
        1. +7
          21 September 2020 17: 06
          Quote: karpusha
          it was Lukashenka who got the people

          What kind of people? Minority? The majority of the people voted for Lukashenka. So shake it off. Nothing shines for your pro-Western minority, except for a term.
          1. 0
            21 September 2020 20: 09
            Where the commissions had a conscience and the votes were counted, Lukashenka was completely defeated. At the level of 10% for Lukashenko and over 80 for Tikhanovskaya.
          2. 0
            21 September 2020 20: 27
            The fact that the elections were held in violation of all possible laws, you prefer not to notice. Even the date of the elections was announced in violation. He could draw himself 150%. Why not. With more people do not care who will be in power, the main thing is that there is a decent standard of living. The only problem is that over the past 10 years, the economy, like wages, has been constantly falling. Plus draconian laws (raising the retirement age, unemployment tax) and much more. There is no need to talk about complete lawlessness. Seizures of banks and firms. So the people could not stand it. Lukashenka can only propose further degradation.
  16. -2
    20 September 2020 21: 40
    And the African cannibals were written off their debts, and they planted some money for the old man.

    Previously, he talked about the 1st milliard, now another one and a half ...
    1. +2
      21 September 2020 01: 02
      They wrote off the debts that the USSR gave them.
      1. 0
        21 September 2020 19: 15
        Nope .... it's famous noodles.

        Forget about the USSR, the Kremlin merged it 30 years ago, and agreed on all debts by 2008 ...
        What they boasted about then very zealously.

        New debts were already forgiven ... mostly, of course. Somewhere there are lists on the internet ...
  17. +3
    20 September 2020 21: 42
    This was stated by the Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation Anton Siluanov in an interview on the TV channel "Russia 1".

    The state debt of the Republic of Belarus as of July 1, 2020 amounted to 52,6 billion... rubles and increased in comparison with the beginning of 2020 by 7,8 billion rubles, or 17,5%.
    External public debt as of July 1, 2020 amounted to 18,0 billion US dollars, having increased from the beginning of the year by USD 0,9 billion or 5,3%
    Why didn't he say about it?
    Given the excellent reputation of Belarus, the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation is confident in the timely return of funds
    But this, already new in the economy, debt is given away, and it is increasing.
    And he also "forgot" to say that most of the government borrowing is not channeled into production or commercial projects, but was used to maintain the balance of payments (to those who wave sticks) and restructure existing debts.
    1. -3
      21 September 2020 15: 01
      Russia gave loans to Belarus for 7 billion, 4 it gave.
      1. +2
        21 September 2020 15: 26
        Quote: Kronos
        Russia gave loans to Belarus for 7 billion, 4 it gave

        The largest debtor to Russia is Belarus - $ 7,55 billion on June 1, 2019 (the figure was provided by the Belarusian Ministry of Finance to RBK).
        Read more at RBC:
        https://www.rbc.ru/economics/19/08/2019/5d48bb559a7947e2278c1fa5
        Minsk owes Moscow more than $ 7,5 billion, the amount of the debt is only increasing. This forced Russia in the summer of 2019 for the first time ever.to speak in refinancing the debt of Belarus.
        According to official figures, Russia owes $ 39,4 billion.
        The first place for September 2019 is occupied by Belarus with the SUM $ 7,55 billion
        This is from various sources.
        Now tell me when after September 2019 Belarus returned $ 4 billion
  18. -2
    20 September 2020 23: 12
    Usually, when it comes to the "decaying west", we angrily stigmatize such topics as potentially outrageous rollbacks.
  19. -1
    21 September 2020 13: 59
    Quote: Alvis07
    But - no, African cannibals are closer and dearer)))

    good good That's right! wassat laughing laughing
  20. 0
    21 September 2020 17: 50
    Quote: Vladimir B.
    Quote: Gennady Fomkin
    This is a claim to Leonid Ilyich

    What does Leonid Ilyich have to do with it? It is not his fault that we cannot collect debts from African countries.

    And they gave bananas long ago under N. Khrushchev laughing
  21. 0
    21 September 2020 17: 51
    Quote: viktor.
    Quote: Alvis07
    But - no, African cannibals are closer and dearer)))

    good good That's right! wassat laughing laughing

    Your money is certainly not there. laughing
  22. 0
    21 September 2020 17: 54
    Quote: karpusha
    If Russia wants to feed daddy, let him feed him. Unprofitable factories will burn this money in 3 months and ask for more.

    No, we will optimize them, carry out reorganization and the proud Belaz will continue to flourish. laughing
  23. 0
    23 September 2020 16: 34
    I would like to know the opinion of people about today's secret inauguration of Lukashenka. What kind of support is 80% such that the ceremony is held secretly from their people in the strictest secrecy? And again the law was violated. by law, the inauguration ceremony must be broadcast on radio and television. But nothing was broadcast. Is this 80% support? FUNNY!