Military Review

The President of Belarus told Shoigu that he turned to Putin for weapons

60

During the talks between the leaders of Russia and Belarus in Sochi, Alexander Lukashenko asked Putin to supply him with certain types weapons... In his opinion, it is necessary to see what and where to strengthen in the interests of the Union State.


As reported by BelTA, the Belarusian leader told the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Sergei Shoigu about this.

Lukashenko also noted that he considers it necessary to take more courageous measures to protect both Belarusian citizens and Russians. He told the Russian president that Minsk and Moscow should not be afraid to act in the interests of the Union State:

There is nothing to be afraid of, we are ready to go for it.

The Belarusian president considers erroneous assumptions that Belarus has weakened, and Russia will stay on the sidelines and will not help. He calls them "reasoning for fools."

It so happened that we were left alone in this regard, but not the weakest.

- said the leader of Belarus.

Lukashenka has no doubts that no one will be able to drive a wedge between our two countries. He is confident in his ability to jointly not only stabilize the situation in Belarus, but also throughout the entire territory of the immense Union State:

You can not doubt our reliability in terms of the defense of our common Fatherland from Brest to Vladivostok.
Photos used:
http://www.kremlin.ru/
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 16 September 2020 18: 54 New
      17
      The Belarusian president considers erroneous assumptions that Belarus has weakened, and Russia will stay on the sidelines and will not help. He calls them "reasoning for fools."

      And when he arrested the "Wagner group," he said completely different words.
      Of course Russia will help, it has always done it!
      1. Looking Petrovich
        Looking Petrovich 16 September 2020 19: 00 New
        20
        And even earlier, Pompeo said the third to his friend: "Maintaining friendly and mutually beneficial relations with the United States is one of the priorities of the foreign policy of the Republic of Belarus ..."
        1. hrych
          hrych 16 September 2020 20: 07 New
          +3
          Whoever remembers the old will be out of sight ..., and whoever will forget the old in both balls wassat People are not saints, they make mistakes and repent. Nothing wrong. So Old Man received his sight and reformed, all the more so in memory there was such a good example:
      2. demo
        demo 16 September 2020 19: 17 New
        14
        Yes. And when he said that all the wars that swept across the territory of Belarus are "not our wars" - is this counted or not counted?
      3. Svetlana
        Svetlana 16 September 2020 21: 02 New
        +1
        Quote: SRC P-15
        The Belarusian president considers erroneous assumptions that Belarus has weakened, and Russia will stay on the sidelines and will not help. He calls them "reasoning for fools."

        And when he arrested the "Wagner group," he said completely different words.
        Of course Russia will help, it has always done it!

        When he was arrested, he did not know who they were. After I figured it out, I let it go. Just imagine, before the elections, a group of unidentified military men appeared in the state. What to do?
        1. U-Gin78
          U-Gin78 17 September 2020 05: 57 New
          +3
          Arresting is one thing, but yapping at the whole world in a particularly sophisticated form in the media is another!
        2. stalki
          stalki 17 September 2020 09: 16 New
          +2
          When he was arrested, he did not know who they were. After I figured it out, I let it go. Just imagine, before the elections, a group of unidentified military men appeared in the state. What to do?
          Think first, then do, and not aim when you have already fired.
      4. smart ass
        smart ass 16 September 2020 22: 00 New
        -10 qualifying.
        The old senile goes to the bottom and drags Russia along with him
        1. Rubi0
          Rubi0 17 September 2020 08: 03 New
          -3
          100%, it is so toxic that it is better as a military aid to a bullet in the forehead
          1. smart ass
            smart ass 17 September 2020 10: 30 New
            +2
            I don’t know why people think that 26 years in power is the norm ..
    2. Deniska999
      Deniska999 16 September 2020 19: 00 New
      -9
      Now, as we begin, in an instant you will be blown into the bath.
      1. Proxodnoi
        Proxodnoi 16 September 2020 19: 10 New
        0
        Quote: Deniska999
        Now, as we begin, in an instant you will be blown into the bath.

        Already complaints with hysterics have gone)))))
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. APASUS
    APASUS 16 September 2020 18: 53 New
    -7
    One state turns to another with a request to supply it with certain types of weapons. And what's the news? Belarus buys S-500 or F-35 ............
    1. Rheinmetall
      Rheinmetall 16 September 2020 18: 55 New
      15
      It is unlikely that she is anything at all buys.
  4. Tank hard
    Tank hard 16 September 2020 18: 54 New
    10
    Let's be honest, I asked for money again .. repeat
    1. Charik
      Charik 16 September 2020 19: 05 New
      +8
      and money and weapons
  5. Livonetc
    Livonetc 16 September 2020 19: 03 New
    21
    How tough and shrewd.
    Yes, Berarusi needs funds.
    The state that was built is distinguished by the concentration of serious industries in the hands of the state.
    It is not a flexible system and not the most cost effective one.
    But at the same time, we unanimously criticize capitalism in Russia.
    We will not give loans to Belarus!
    Let's say together No!
    So what do we get?
    Belarus already owes us $ 8 billion.
    If a coup d'état takes place, we will never get them.
    And we will also get a second ruin nearby.
    Do we need it badly?
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 16 September 2020 19: 09 New
      10
      Quote: Livonetc
      If a coup d'état takes place, we will never get them.
      And we will also get a second ruin nearby.
      Do we need it badly?

      You said everything with that, nobody needs it.
    2. askort154
      askort154 16 September 2020 19: 55 New
      +2
      Livonetc And we will also get a second ruin nearby.
      Do we need it badly?


      Gennady, I will not quote your entire comment. In general, human terms, you laid out everything clearly.
      But, the upper rulers - lived, live, and will live according to other life canons, regardless of the wishes of their "subjects". They act very simply, from time to time they change the signs of "their love for the people."
      We are all familiar with them - starting with the "French revolution" and ending with the "Ukrainian Maidan". Of course, it was before - the slaves rebelled, but then there was no "Internet", and the power-hungry had much more modest desires in their
      life's whims. It would seem that centuries have passed, civilization will progress, and the life of homosapiens on planet Earth will only get better. But alas! She is constantly spoiled - psychologically sick people, maniacally striving for power. They were, are and will be. hi
    3. Tank hard
      Tank hard 16 September 2020 20: 38 New
      -4
      Quote: Livonetc
      How tough and shrewd.

      The story with "33 Bogatyrs" and PMC "Wagner" is too fresh .. Yes, and Yanik "reigned" in Ukraine for a long time .. repeat
    4. _Ugene_
      _Ugene_ 16 September 2020 22: 57 New
      -4
      The state that was built is distinguished by the concentration of serious industries in the hands of the state.
      It is not a flexible system and not the most cost effective one.
      and they are going to change something in their inefficient economy? no, i.e. we will continue to pay for their losses, motivating it by saying that it is a brotherly state, is that correct in your opinion? it definitely needs to change something
      1. Incvizitor
        Incvizitor 17 September 2020 00: 36 New
        +3
        Save the main state and then restore order.
        1. _Ugene_
          _Ugene_ 17 September 2020 12: 08 New
          +1
          Let Lukashenka not restore any order in the economy, he does not know how to do it any other way, he only lives on subsidies from Russia, as they cover a little faucet, he immediately begins to engage in extortion, it is indicative to meet with all sorts of Biden and so on, i.e. so we will pay for the alliance, about $ 100 billion has already been invested, while he does not even allow us to place a military base there
    5. Ryazan87
      Ryazan87 16 September 2020 23: 01 New
      -3
      if a coup d'état takes place, we will never get them.

      Russia will receive them no earlier than 3 billion from Ukraine.
      And yes, $ 8.5 billion is just straight debt. Over the past 20 years, about $ 100 billion of Russian money has been injected into Belarus and this "chairman" either directly or indirectly (in the form of all benefits and customs concessions). So they decided to donate another 1.5 billion.
    6. Rubi0
      Rubi0 17 September 2020 08: 11 New
      0
      Yes, they just have to give goods for 8 lard, and better infrastructure and factories for management, the same potash fertilizers are in state ownership and are quite suitable for themselves, in 49 years of concession they will repulse the debt.
    7. smart ass
      smart ass 17 September 2020 10: 31 New
      -1
      Do you remember how Ukraine was given 15 cartoons?
    8. Alex Justice
      Alex Justice 17 September 2020 17: 36 New
      0
      And we will also get a second ruin nearby.
      Do we need it badly?

      It is not right to feed your neighbor for beautiful eyes when you yourself are not enough. The neighbor must move to a Russian apartment, then everything is equally divided.
  6. Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 16 September 2020 19: 07 New
    0
    That means NATO tried to bring in a contingent to supposedly protect "peaceful protests". It didn't work out, now they are imposing sanctions ...
    1. venik
      venik 16 September 2020 20: 22 New
      +2
      Quote: Tank jacket
      That means NATO tried to bring in a contingent to supposedly protect "peaceful protests".

      =======
      Would try !!! angry
      --------
      Quote: Tank jacket
      It didn't work out, now they are imposing sanctions ...

      =======
      And this is as usual! ... On the "beaten track"! am What else to expect from them?
  7. rocket757
    rocket757 16 September 2020 19: 08 New
    +4
    I don’t want to hear anything!
    In his opinion, it is necessary to see what and where to strengthen in the interests of the Union State.

    The LAG interprets its DUTIES very frivolously as an ally, without doing anything real in fulfilling its obligations. Besides, he brought Belarus almost to the state of neighbors !!! Unless there are still no jumps and pots on the streets !!! BUT, if you don’t take urgent measures, you don’t fix a lot, a lot, of his own stocks, the situation will still slide down to a jump !!!
    I don't want to believe that OURS do not understand this!?!?!?
  8. parusnik
    parusnik 16 September 2020 19: 23 New
    +3
    Oh how! I remembered about the Union State and its interests. laughing And as I said, first of all, first of all, the planes, well, and the girls then, in the sense that from the beginning of the settlement of economic issues between Russia and Belarus, and then the union state. smile But do figle, interests are not personal, geopolitical. Maybe while the Union State is in power, it will rise again. As in a fairy tale, the prince kissed the dead princess ... laughing Or another story, Ivan Tsarevich kissed the frog and it turned into Vasilisa the Beautiful .. laughing
    1. Tank hard
      Tank hard 16 September 2020 20: 39 New
      +1
      Quote: parusnik
      Oh how! I remembered about the Union State and its interests.

      So far (as always) only words. And the money is already real. request
  9. Observer2014
    Observer2014 16 September 2020 19: 33 New
    -2
    During the talks between the leaders of Russia and Belarus in Sochi, Alexander Lukashenko asked Putin to supply him with certain types of weapons
    The list of names will be this "certain types of weapons"? Then we will discuss: why, why. And whether or not Lukashenka should be supplied with him. The name is specific from the beginning. Then a discussion.
    1. Proxodnoi
      Proxodnoi 16 September 2020 19: 42 New
      -14 qualifying.
      Quote: Observer2014
      During the talks between the leaders of Russia and Belarus in Sochi, Alexander Lukashenko asked Putin to supply him with certain types of weapons
      The list of names will be this "certain types of weapons"? Then we will discuss: why, why. And whether or not Lukashenka should be supplied with him. The name is specific from the beginning. Then a discussion.

      It smells like a referendum .. What kind of weapons to supply and the meaning? Everything goes to this ..
      So get ready, like Cr ... Oh, not yet))))) Quiet .. lol
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 16 September 2020 20: 03 New
        -2
        Quote: Proxodnoi
        Quote: Observer2014
        During the talks between the leaders of Russia and Belarus in Sochi, Alexander Lukashenko asked Putin to supply him with certain types of weapons
        The list of names will be this "certain types of weapons"? Then we will discuss: why, why. And whether or not Lukashenka should be supplied with him. The name is specific from the beginning. Then a discussion.

        It smells like a referendum .. What kind of weapons to supply and the meaning? Everything goes to this ..
        So get ready, like Cr ... Oh, not yet))))) Quiet .. lol

        We don’t care what smells there. Lukashenka needs a weapon. He (Lukashenka) said enough in an interview with Gordon. So that his "Wishlist" in terms of weapons is now paid very close attention. True, we must pay tribute to our specialists, and then they showed the lapel a turn in offensive missile weapons. Over there, "Polonaise" with the Chinese naughty. And that's enough for him.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Observer2014
            Observer2014 16 September 2020 20: 34 New
            -1
            Quote: Proxodnoi
            Quote: Observer2014
            We don’t care what smells there. Lukashenka needs a weapon. He (Lukashenka) said enough in an interview with Gordon.

            Why are you clung to this Gordon? It doesn't matter who said what and when
            Now there is a stage that has been planned for a long time .. This is the main goal !!!

            Yeah, and who will remember the old ....? laughing Can I not list a bunch of why Lukashenka for a long time, I do not trust and I am not interested in his personal wishlist, wishlist, and his other garbage? Because this is a bundle of cunning energy "give me a penny, I'm your brother" So he always says when he needs money And that's all. Where is his fraternal relations in Russia and with Russia? In addition to give money, I will support you in Belarus and cover wassat laughingHis relationship with Russia is that the chairman of the collective farm went to the regional committee and muddled out what for his collective farm. Shakhnazarov came up with. Not me. Better not to describe what is happening. I'm not a fan of this Shakhnazarov, but mln. What is. That is. hi
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Observer2014
                Observer2014 16 September 2020 21: 03 New
                0
                Well, they took Lukashenka "gentlemen"? Figs to you, not Belarus .. We will soon be one state and then you will already Zanoete everything!
                Good luck, you won’t talk to everyone .. hi There are still we have strong .. he he
                The most important thing will be determined. With whom they will unite. With Lukashenko or Belarus.
  10. iouris
    iouris 16 September 2020 19: 53 New
    -1
    There is something in the air ... Everyone understands what it is. The test of a thermonuclear bomb on Novaya Zemlya can still defuse the situation. Of course, CNN, BBC, DW operators should be invited.
  11. maiman61
    maiman61 16 September 2020 20: 03 New
    +5
    Chatter and deeds are different things. Better to say about Crimea, South Ossetia and Abkhazia! Tongue around on this subject!
    1. Dmitry10SPb
      Dmitry10SPb 17 September 2020 01: 17 New
      +1
      Will he say for free? Cooking for another yard and a half. Then he will say about the common Fatherland from Brest to Yalta. And recognizes our Crimea. Delov something. I say exactly. After all, he threw the old man into sickly grandmothers again!
  12. Mishanya 74
    Mishanya 74 16 September 2020 20: 15 New
    -1
    This disgusting person of course turned out to be this Lukashenka ..
    Extremely long
  13. askort154
    askort154 16 September 2020 20: 19 New
    +4
    And even earlier, Pompeo said the third to his friend: "Maintaining friendly and mutually beneficial relations with the United States is one of the priorities of the foreign policy of the Republic of Belarus ..."

    I remember, after the war, there was an assessment - "man".
    "I would go on reconnaissance with him"! ... or - "I would take him into reconnaissance"!
    I am now looking at the former political officer of a tank company - Lukashenko, and I am sure that the former warriors of the Great Patriotic War - "would not have gone to reconnaissance with him!" Or rather, they didn't take it! Blackmailer is an asshole! Russia is forced to endure him, and he brazenly plays on this. Before the last elections he bargained for 3 billion, now he begged for 1,5.negative
    1. Tank hard
      Tank hard 16 September 2020 20: 41 New
      +1
      Quote: askort154
      I remember, after the war, there was an assessment - "man".
      "I would go on reconnaissance with him"! ... or - "I would take him into reconnaissance"!
      I am now looking at the former political officer of a tank company - Lukashenko, and I am sure that the former warriors of the Great Patriotic War - "would not have gone to reconnaissance with him!" Or rather, they didn't take it! Blackmailer is an asshole! Russia is forced to endure him, and he brazenly plays on this. Before the last elections he bargained for 3 billion, now he begged for 1,5

      Plus
    2. maiman61
      maiman61 17 September 2020 08: 01 New
      +1
      With him, not only in reconnaissance, to sit down on the same field!
  14. mihail_mihail0620
    mihail_mihail0620 16 September 2020 20: 35 New
    0
    During the talks between the leaders of Russia and Belarus in Sochi, Alexander Lukashenko asked Putin to supply him with certain types of weapons.

    Maybe better than good pills in the autumn aggravation?
  15. Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 16 September 2020 20: 50 New
    -3
    "The President of Belarus told Shoigu that he turned to Putin for weapons"
    No way, for atomic! ..
    Soviet installations / mines have long been asking for upgrades. Presumably.
  16. Ovsigovets
    Ovsigovets 16 September 2020 21: 21 New
    0
    Quote: SRC P-15
    The Belarusian president considers erroneous assumptions that Belarus has weakened, and Russia will stay on the sidelines and will not help. He calls them "reasoning for fools."

    And when he arrested the "Wagner group," he said completely different words.
    Of course Russia will help, it has always done it!

    and this should not be forgotten ... we must remember ... remember and remind Luka - poke his nose like a kutenka into a kaku
  17. Vladimir61
    Vladimir61 16 September 2020 22: 08 New
    +6
    Before asking for something and swearing in Lukashenka's eternal friendship, it is necessary to answer the following questions: Whose Crimea? Who unleashed the civil war in Ukraine and who are the defenders of Donbass? Will Belarus continue to supply Ukraine with weapons, technologies and fuel for the Armed Forces of Ukraine? Will Belarus recognize the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia?
    1. Alexey Z
      Alexey Z 17 September 2020 19: 31 New
      -1
      And Russia does not supply fuel for the Ukrainian Armed Forces to Ukraine? Significantly larger than Belarus.
  18. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 16 September 2020 22: 11 New
    -1
    Chet Trump pissed off on protesters, according to Sergei Naryshkin, only $ 20 million. Maybe Trump's good analysts figured out, a waste of money. Now they press on the European Union to organize a dialogue between Lukashenka AG and the council of protesters. And the father bends his line. presented 43 criminal cases on threats to police officers and members of their families, the articles are very serious. The Constitution will be written under his control. From Europe only miserable bleating and only to Putin V.V. Yes, Father will not shoot without trial. There will be the most humane Belarusian court in the world. We will only answer that we do not interfere in the affairs of a sovereign state and cannot indicate what to do to the legally elected president. If the protesters do not understand that they swung at the state without measuring their strength, then this is their problem. They sit in burrows, remember how they dug up their dachas and like the sewage system was turned off. It won't rust to repeat it. Lukashenka didn’t talk a lot today. I read the news and I understand why journalists are so often invited to talk to law enforcement agencies. How should we be more serious about our work. There is a report about the procession in support of Lukashenka, and a photo with protestors and Polish flags. Whoever likes it. Batka seems to have played enough of a lot of vectors. I apologize a lot of letters. Mongrels bark but our caravan is going in the right direction. hi lol
    1. Vladimir_6
      Vladimir_6 17 September 2020 06: 31 New
      +1
      Quote: tralflot1832
      The ambassadors are sitting in burrows, they remember how their dachas were dug up and the sewerage system seemed to be turned off.

      Dad did not touch the dacha He deprived the ambassadors of their diplomatic rank.
      President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko stripped a number of diplomats, including those who supported the protests in the country.
      Thus, by decree of the head of state, Pavel Latushko, who had previously worked as ambassador to France and Poland, and Igor Leshchenya, who headed the diplomatic mission in Slovakia, lost the rank of ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary.
      The decision is related to the commission of acts defaming the diplomatic service.
      By another decree, Lukashenka dismissed and stripped the diplomatic rank of Belarusian Ambassador to Latvia Vasily Markovich "for improper performance of official duties."

      hi
  19. Ulysses
    Ulysses 16 September 2020 22: 19 New
    +1
    While Lukashenka suffers from a multi-vector nature, he is not a horse.
    The comrades above correctly noted.
    Let him decide on his position on a number of issues.
  20. Whisper
    Whisper 16 September 2020 23: 31 New
    -3
    Cool kid, and so on in a circle! And our immortal, there is no hurry, took, and again believed the mustachioed cockroach.
  21. Boris Afinogenov
    Boris Afinogenov 17 September 2020 00: 15 New
    -3
    I don't know, people. I don't like something Grygorich. I really don't like it. Even his surname is hoh ... krainsky.

    Well, a typical local prince from the Russian world:

    - I am friends with the Russian Federation, but when it is beneficial to me.
    - Give money, but I want to be independent.
    - Russia has problems - decide for yourself, we are not Russia.
    - we have problems - Russia, help!

    Yanukovych, no?

    It is a pity that all this elite of Ukraine, Belarus and Russia does not allow all Russians to live in one country.
  22. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 17 September 2020 00: 35 New
    0
    Lukashenka has no doubts that no one will be able to drive a wedge between our two countries.
    so far he has done the best with it.
  23. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 17 September 2020 01: 06 New
    0
    As for the ambassadors, I take my words back. Lukashenka doesn’t work hard. Ambassadors run around the apartments of the protestant committee members, like they become “human shields” so that their charges are not arrested, but they themselves probably bring in the money. wasn’t there? am
  24. Alien From
    Alien From 17 September 2020 03: 40 New
    +1
    Stirlitz tensed ...
  25. Alien From
    Alien From 17 September 2020 03: 45 New
    0
    Will Putin give?
  26. Asad
    Asad 17 September 2020 04: 01 New
    0
    And Shoigu was not aware of weapons? Did the Defense Minister not know about the talks in Sochi?
  27. alexey alexeyev_2
    alexey alexeyev_2 18 September 2020 16: 02 New
    -1
    Potential Judas. Do not give him anything. Put five divisions into Belarus. We will sleep more calmly. And our multi-vector will be under supervision