Lukashenka named the timing of the launch of the first power unit of BelNPP

73
Lukashenka named the timing of the launch of the first power unit of BelNPP

The launch of the first power unit of the Belarusian Nuclear Power Plant (BelNPP) is scheduled for November 7 this year. This was stated by the Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko during a meeting with the "political activists" of the republic.

Our first nuclear power plant is being prepared for launch. I invite everyone. I think November 7 - a significant day for us - we will be able to visit there and say that we received the first electricity from our nuclear power plant

- said Lukashenko.



Earlier, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Lithuania made an appeal to the European Union, urging it once again to stop the launch of the BelNPP. The reason for this in Vilnius was called the unstable situation in Belarus associated with the protests. In addition, Lithuania has once again warned the EU about the threats associated with the launch of the BelNPP, drawing attention to the possibility of accidents and incidents. Later, the Lithuanian government approved a plan to block electricity imports from BelNPP.

It should be reminded that on August 7, 2020, the loading of nuclear fuel into the reactor core of the first power unit of the BelNPP began. The power start-up of the first power unit with connection to the power system is planned for the fourth quarter of this year, and the commissioning of power unit No. 1 is planned for the beginning of 2021. The second power unit is to enter commercial operation in 2022.

The BelNPP with two VVER-1200 reactors with a total capacity of 2400 MW is located in the Grodno region in Ostrovets. BelNPP was built according to the Russian project of generation 3+, which fully complies with international standards and IAEA safety recommendations.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    73 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +11
      16 September 2020 16: 41
      Our first nuclear power plant is being prepared for launch. I invite everyone.

      We will arrive Old Man, the main thing is bite your tongue)))) November 7 is a significant day for all those born in the USSR, I hope we will not stop there?
      The unbreakable union of the free republics .. It is long overdue!
      1. +16
        16 September 2020 16: 45
        The launch of the first power unit of the Belarusian nuclear power plant (BelNPP) is scheduled for November 7

        Balts like a sickle for me ...
        1. +12
          16 September 2020 16: 56
          Quote: figvam
          Balts like a sickle for me ...

          There they are preparing for a worse surprise, as well as in Poland .. Patience has run out already, from their impudence.
          It's time to roar the Russian bear all over Europe.
          The old man is now like silk after meeting in Sochi .. laughing
          Well Shoigu is directing the inspection there, along the way there will be new assignments in the air defense, especially ..
    2. +16
      16 September 2020 16: 42
      Great news!

      The NPP will increase the competitiveness of Belarusian goods due to cheap energy and increase its sustainability in everything.
      Good luck!

      And this: "The Lithuanian government approved a plan to block the import of electricity from BelNPP." -GREATEST violation of the EU rules, PROHIBITING blocking the transit of electricity to the EU.

      If you do not want it yourself, do not take it, but you MUST skip it!
      1. +5
        16 September 2020 16: 59
        Quote: Olgovich
        The NPP will increase the competitiveness of Belarusian goods due to cheap energy and increase its sustainability in everything.
        Good luck!

        Exactly ! But this time the matter will not end with this .. The main thing is not to delay the legal procedures, etc.
    3. +16
      16 September 2020 16: 44
      November 7 - a significant day for us

      And for us. Congratulations to Belarus. Let the Balts bite your elbow, Ingalinskaya NPP is not needed once.
      1. +15
        16 September 2020 17: 05
        Quote: Ragnar lodbrok
        Congratulations to Belorussiyu. Let the Balts bite your elbow, Ingalinskaya NPP is not needed once.

        I join the congratulations to Belarus! Non-Balts destroyed the Soviet. They are now waiting for subsidies from the EU.
        1. +3
          16 September 2020 21: 02
          Quote: Reptiloid
          I join the congratulations to Belarus!

          =========
          good drinks
          -------
          Quote: Reptiloid
          Non-Balts destroyed the Soviet. They are now waiting for subsidies from the EU.

          =========
          Their whole "economy" is nothing more than "export" cheap labor force (builders, scavengers, nurses, housekeepers, janitors)! HERE they are "Geyrosoyuz" wassat And "gayropean values" in addition !!!
          1. +6
            16 September 2020 21: 29
            In the USSR they were elevated. (This is a term from science fiction) In the 200-volume edition of World Literature, some of them are included. Who knows about them now request Their folk art was promoted and sold ----- ceramics, knitting, tapestries. Also mosaics. How do I know? In the library, which I inherited from my relatives, there are books on the art of various Soviet republics and peoples. I wanted to get rid of the non-Balts, my mother says --- the memory of the USSR. They had cinematography in the USSR. No one needs any of this and no one is now even thinking of raising them. But they don't seem to need it. Not according to them development. I'm not talking about factories, research institutes, universities ...
            1. +6
              16 September 2020 22: 06
              Quote: Reptiloid
              No one needs any of this and no one is now even thinking of raising them. But they don't seem to need it. Not according to them development. I'm not talking about factories, research institutes, universities ...

              ========
              Dmitry! The worst thing is in something else! Our company commander was an Estonian - called Eyvo. is he perished, covering our retreat (me then Ukrainian Oleg - "on the hump" pulled out - I myself was a "carcass").
              It is scary that in his homeland (in Tartu), his probably also a hero don't count! Like - he fought - "for okkupantov" .... But he was a HERO!
              This is SCARY !!! What are HEROES - "them" - NOT NEEDED!
              1. +3
                16 September 2020 22: 13
                You know, sometimes, thinking about something like that ((not only among them)), thoughts came - it's good that those real Soviet people do not see today. Although someone sees --- in Ukraine, there were some protests against veterans in the underbalance ((I didn't want to read)), but in our country, meanness is spreading ...
                1. +3
                  16 September 2020 23: 23
                  Quote: Reptiloid
                  but after all, meanness is spreading with us ...

                  ========
                  Alas!!! Some "litter" how much!
    4. +1
      16 September 2020 16: 46
      BelNPP with two VVER-1200 reactors with a total capacity of 2400 MW

      The station, of course, is a good thing ... But where does Belarus plan to direct the generated energy? Energy-intensive production of a round-the-clock work cycle has not been created, export is more than problematic ... And the loan must be returned. As they say, there was no trouble, we bought a pig. Or maybe Lukashenka has some kind of plan for the BelNPP, which energy analysts do not know about?
      1. 0
        16 September 2020 16: 51
        Do you need to return the loan ?? !!! What are you talking about ? ... Luke gave us back a lot? And where will he get the money from? ... it's all for free ... and we ourselves have put an extra brick in the foundation of independent Belarus. !!
        1. -1
          16 September 2020 18: 16
          don't talk nonsense
          1. +1
            16 September 2020 22: 31
            How many times have I heard this several years ago .... but a month ago I began to remind my interlocutors (about my stupidity), and they answered me: Well, who could have thought ..... imagine? This is all akin to the fact that the USSR built different industries in the republics and the republics believed in themselves ... now you would have thrown off Luka and you would say stupidity ... this territory has two paths, either Ukrainian, or to Russia, and then we will find out who is talking stupidity ..
            1. -2
              17 September 2020 07: 58
              if we do not borrow then they will give the IMF from the usa and then surely Belarus will leave
              1. -1
                17 September 2020 12: 36
                We gave Ukraine .., who went where? .. and if this is the question, then it is better to leave. How much are you going to feed them (in time)?
                1. -2
                  17 September 2020 13: 13
                  how long will it take otherwise you can say goodbye right away
                  1. 0
                    17 September 2020 13: 17
                    So it might be better to say goodbye earlier, because such cases end anyway ... like that even, to be honest, you are writing some kind of stupidity .. as long as it takes, well, this is generally a kindergarten ..
                    1. -2
                      17 September 2020 13: 27
                      say goodbye to everyone and then they will get to Russia
                      1. 0
                        17 September 2020 13: 38
                        Well, if we cannot defend our own in another way, then we will have to and we are already saying goodbye ...
          2. +1
            16 September 2020 22: 36
            And by the way, yes, did Luke return a lot to us? If I say nonsense ...
            1. -3
              17 September 2020 07: 59
              yes it does and now he has to give about 700 lam in September or October
              1. 0
                17 September 2020 12: 38
                Give at least one link or document where it is written that Belarus has paid off the debt. Please .. only debt from 100 million dollars (at least) ..
                And about the stupidity of the word do not want to take back yet?
                1. -2
                  17 September 2020 13: 12
                  In particular, in 2020 Belarus should give the Russian Federation 2,8 billion rubles, China - 1,3 billion, the Eurasian Fund for Stabilization and Development (which is actually managed by the Russian Ministry of Finance) - 1,08 billion. Also, 0,7 billion rubles must be paid to the World Bank and investors for Belarusian bonds placed on financial markets.
                  In total, Belarus owes Russia $ 7,9 billion, China - 3,3 billion, EFSD - 2,7 billion, loans from Western investors - 3 billion.
                  The Belarusian government plans that at the end of next year the national debt will amount to 54,4 billion rubles, that is, 37,8% of GDP. This growth is due to the loan for the construction of nuclear power plants.
                  1. 0
                    17 September 2020 13: 15
                    Have you read my comment carefully? I asked about Luke's plans to find out, but what he did, i.e. loans given ..
                    1. -2
                      17 September 2020 13: 20
                      The repayment of the external public debt in January 2020 amounted to USD 259,9 million:

                      - 167,7 million US dollars - Chinese banks;
                      - 92,2 million US dollars - the Government of the Russian Federation.
                      open google, there are a lot of tables by years how much and to whom Belarus paid
                      1. 0
                        17 September 2020 13: 23
                        Yes, you can pay the amount, if you do not take another, instead of this one! He takes even more now ... is the meaning clear?
                        1. -1
                          17 September 2020 13: 29
                          no, not clear, borrows, and not only from Russia, pays almost always regularly
                        2. 0
                          17 September 2020 13: 56
                          He takes more than he pays .. he now owes about 7 billion dollars (recently there was an article here), and gave a hundred dollars ... you know the difference? And if you don't understand, then it's okay, let's wait for the next Maidan, then they will explain to you more popularly ...
                        3. -2
                          17 September 2020 14: 56
                          and what is the Maidan? do not need to give? just don’t cite Ukraine as an example, it paid completely with the Crimea and everything that is there, the Gomel region is also good for 7 lard
                        4. 0
                          17 September 2020 15: 04
                          Well, Ukraine's example here is absolutely correct, because We took the Crimea only because we decided on our own, it doesn't regulate the problem of debt! What have we already done mutual offset? Did I miss something ? We bought the Crimea? Or when they gave money, such an agreement was .. we give you money, and then you give us the Crimea?
                          And about the Gomel region ... please enlighten ... here I don't understand you either, we are given the region in exchange for 7 billion. Dollars? As far as I remember for the Belarusians, independence is in the first place! Not ?
                        5. -2
                          17 September 2020 15: 14
                          it turned out that so 3 lard to the Crimea))) but maybe over time and 3 will be returned, but there is no faith in the court, but what about Belarus, if the Ukrainian follows the scenario, not only the Gomel region expresses a desire to join))) but this is hardly, Belarusians are not against Russia
                        6. 0
                          17 September 2020 15: 26
                          - IF - if, but if only what are you like in kindergarten? Not serious. Word if, I do not want to comment, this is stupidity, maybe you enjoy living in dreams .. it's your business. Reality is different ..
                        7. -2
                          17 September 2020 15: 42
                          let's see what happens, whether they give it back or not give it back, it's not up to you
                        8. 0
                          17 September 2020 16: 39
                          And what was the hint that I can solve this issue?
                        9. 0
                          17 September 2020 14: 20
                          Now I read about the external debt of Belarus .. every year I donate the amount, but it always takes more than the amounts that it gives every year .. so what's not clear? So you can give ..
                        10. -2
                          17 September 2020 14: 54
                          and with this no one argues that he again takes
                        11. 0
                          17 September 2020 14: 59
                          So the point is that it takes more than it gives! And why do you even say that he gives? Are you making such a joke? Give me a loan, I will always give you back, on condition that you give me more next time? Good ?. now the meaning of your comments starts to slip away ...
                          What is the fact? It always takes more than it gives .. right? It turns out that he always borrows and does not give back .. right?
                        12. -2
                          17 September 2020 15: 16
                          you said that he does not pay, but he pays regularly (he paid off the first loans with interest) and therefore they still give him, including China
                        13. 0
                          17 September 2020 15: 31
                          If you read my comment, it turns out that you are kidding ... so I bow ...
                        14. -2
                          17 September 2020 15: 43
                          live in your own reality, Russia is doing the right thing that lending, it's good that you are not in the government
        2. -1
          16 September 2020 20: 42
          Quote: vitvit123
          it's all for free

          Don't choke on greed. Not everything is measured in money.
          1. +2
            16 September 2020 22: 35
            And I want to agree .. but after watching the scenario of our fraternal republics I will refrain .. what would you say a month ago if you threw off Luka? Judging by history, the more we invested in the republics, the more they felt independent .. what gesheft of Russia from this station, at our expense, built for Luka?
          2. +2
            16 September 2020 22: 37
            You try to draw your commentary on Luke ..., I think he would answer you, but how can I do without them ...
            Judging by the history of our relations with the republics, this is exactly what happened. Russia developed industry, etc. , and the republics began to believe in themselves and became independent. What's wrong ? What is the benefit of Russia from the station built at our expense Luka? Luka will earn money, develop his economy and say that the Belarusians are such supermen who are good at everything, but in Russia everything is bad (oligarchs, etc.), well, everything that was a month ago ... it seems like you just woke up, and a month ago did not hear this villain ..
            1. -2
              17 September 2020 08: 01
              and those who invested the money will receive it, but it will take 20 years for it to pay off
              1. 0
                17 September 2020 12: 39
                Blessed is he who believes ... I won't add anything else ...
                1. -2
                  17 September 2020 13: 15
                  the same with Turkey
                  1. 0
                    17 September 2020 13: 20
                    What does Turkey have to do with it? ! We speak for Belarus !!! Hello? Are you here or what? This is a stupid method of certain people to jump off the topic ... once again we speak for Belarus ... you are not the first to do this ... (jumps to others)
                    1. -2
                      17 September 2020 13: 28
                      Turkey has to do with it because the anthological situation with the nuclear power plant
                      1. 0
                        17 September 2020 13: 42
                        Once again ... speech for Belarus ... examples can be cited different .. talk about Belarus .. who are we where, what we give is another question ...
          3. 0
            17 September 2020 07: 56
            Everything is measured by them, I do not understand this soviet thinking we will live in shit but help the whole world, but then groan and gasp that Putin is to blame that the pension is 65, but how else if you are ready to work for a ball. Give up all social payments and pensions inclusive and work for yourself until you lose your pulse
            1. -2
              17 September 2020 08: 44
              Quote: Rubi0
              Everything is measured by them

              Do you have friends? Are you friends with them for money? The more money they gave you, the stronger the friendship?
              1. -1
                17 September 2020 10: 51
                I have no friends who ask for a loan
              2. 0
                17 September 2020 12: 40
                Well, so it turns out that Luka is friends with us for money .. we give friends, we don’t give enemies, invaders .. no?
      2. -2
        16 September 2020 22: 25
        But where does Belarus plan to direct the generated energy?


        Into a single power system. Electric ring of Belarus, Russia, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. The Balts will buy from Russia. This product does not deteriorate and is quite world class. Or maybe NPPs are unprofitable all over the world? laughing We do not take into account the Germans, they have not sober up yet.
      3. +3
        16 September 2020 23: 26
        Quote: Hagen
        The station, of course, is a good thing ... But where does Belarus plan to direct the generated energy? Energy-intensive production of a round-the-clock work cycle has not been created, export is more than problematic.

        Export is actually problematic. We have the Smolensk NPP in the west, on the outskirts of Rivne, but there are problems with the rest of our neighbors. Lithuania on the woof .. went, Latvia. Its officials say they have no plans to support the Lithuanian boycott of the BelNPP yet. The problem here is that there are simply no large lines capable of transmitting electricity from Belarus to Latvia.
        Almost half of the Belarusian electricity today is generated by two large GRES - Lukoml and Berezovskaya. The rest is mainly produced at thermal power plants, which, in addition to electricity, supply Belarusians with heat.
        They will be transferred to the "hot reserve" of the Lukoml state district power station. "Hot", in case of problems with the rectors. The capacity of the existing stations will be reduced.
        The station was built for the sake of energy security of the Republic of Belarus and reducing the share of natural gas in the fuel balance of power plants (25-30% less gas will be purchased in Russia), reducing the electricity tariff for enterprises by one and a half times by 2021 (from 12 to 8 cents per kWh ). This will affect the cost of production and its competitiveness.
        1. +2
          17 September 2020 00: 05
          Export is actually problematic.

          In any case, Belarus is part of the unified energy system inherited from the USSR. Together with the Baltics and Kaliningrad. So it's a good thing on either side. Electricity will always be needed (even when the dollar is not needed laughing ). At least for the Belarusians themselves, at least for sale. And getting it in the right amount is not easy. Or burn a fuel or an atom. Wind turbines and solar batteries can power an office or a brothel, and even then without heating. But not production.
          In short, an excellent investment. Even your grandchildren will remain. And the Balts povyyzhivayutsya, count the money and buy.
    5. +4
      16 September 2020 16: 48
      Lithuania nervously began to convulse, or rather the government of Lithuania. Father sent the Lithuanian and European greens in the forest on an erotic journey. Father, do not pour the tables, cover them, I will not correct them, Let's go! drinks
      1. +1
        17 September 2020 02: 57
        The most interesting thing is that if the nuclear power plant was built by the Americans, the Balts would not have opened their mouths! And here, you know, Russia is building.
    6. +5
      16 September 2020 16: 48
      Here I read it, I thought.
      Came across here on the forum of the topic "hydrogen strategy" (if the title is correct).
      The electricity produced by the Belarusian nuclear power plant is considered ecologically dangerous in Europe.
      Will hydrogen fuel be considered environmentally friendly?
      And as for its production, a lot of electricity is required.
      Thus, Belarus will start producing hydrogen, having cheap energy resources.
      And if Geyropa refuses, it will redirect this hydrogen to the hydrogen transport system of Russia.
      It does not exist yet, but it will be, since a similar hydrogen strategy has been adopted in Russia.
      And there Russia will consolidate the produced hydrogen and arrange export supplies of this gas as well.
      In general, let the Europeans turn green.
      nuclear energy will help them in this.
      Even if they refuse it, as such.
      1. -1
        16 September 2020 17: 05
        Quote: Livonetc
        The electricity produced by the Belarusian nuclear power plant is considered ecologically dangerous in Europe.
        Will hydrogen fuel be considered environmentally friendly?
        And as for its production, a lot of electricity is required.
        Thus, Belarus will start producing hydrogen, having cheap energy resources.

        The question is: how will RB pump this hydrogen to Europe if the pipe is ours, and the contract with the Poles for gas transit through this pipe is coming to an end and there are no plans to prolong it? To do this, it was necessary to install a nuclear power plant somewhere in the Leningrad or Pskov regions ... Anyway, this station will add worries to both us and Belarusians.
        1. +2
          16 September 2020 17: 08
          I'm not talking about existing gas pipelines for hydrocarbons.
          About a new energy strategy in the world, which is planned for implementation on hydrogen.
          Transporting this product will require different piping and pumping systems.
          1. -1
            16 September 2020 17: 14
            Quote: Livonetc
            Transporting this product will require different piping and pumping systems.

            What is the fundamental difference? For more than six months now, analysts have been discussing the topic of converting SP-2 from gas to hydrogen. Moreover, the Republic of Belarus does not have its own gas, as well as opportunities in the future to arrange the supply of the produced product anywhere. It is easier to establish chemical production from our oil and gas ... But this is not even in the plans (in any case, something tangible has not been voiced), and EE will begin to come from the station this year.
            1. 0
              16 September 2020 17: 17
              I'm not a specialist.
              It seems to me that hydrogen is sick with a dangerous substance for pumping.
              It may be necessary to develop new equipment for compressor stations.
              1. +1
                16 September 2020 17: 23
                Quote: Livonetc
                It may be necessary to develop new equipment for compressor stations.

                I am not a chemist either, but I think that the COP will definitely need others. And according to the degree of danger, both of them, both GHG and hydrogen, are dangerous when combined with an air mixture or oxygen. But I think that this idea has the advantage that it is much more difficult to liquefy hydrogen than NG, and therefore no "shale" from a barge because of a puddle is not a competitor to it. Having cheap raw materials and energy efficiency, few people in Europe and in us can make it up.
              2. +1
                16 September 2020 18: 42
                Quote: Livonetc
                It seems to me that hydrogen is sick with a dangerous substance for pumping.

                True!

                Dangerous to convulsions!
          2. -3
            16 September 2020 17: 43
            We are planning the construction of a processing plant in Energodar
            Frau Merkel named Ukraine as one of the components of Europe's hydrogen strategy
      2. The comment was deleted.
    7. 0
      17 September 2020 07: 11
      The Lithuanian Foreign Ministry made an appeal to the European Union, urging it once again to stop the launch of the BelNPP.

      Obscurantists of the XXI century.
    8. 0
      17 September 2020 10: 30
      Quote: Hagen
      The station, of course, is a good thing ... But where does Belarus plan to direct the generated energy?

      Everyone needs cheap power for everything. It can be replaced by both more expensive electricity and almost all other energy resources.
    9. 0
      17 September 2020 10: 35
      Quote: Hagen
      The question is: how will RB pump this hydrogen to Europe if the pipe is ours, and the contract with the Poles for gas transit through this pipe is coming to an end and there are no plans to prolong it?

      Cheap electricity means cheap hydrogen, and it can be used to make cheap ammonia, methanol, liquid fuels, and so on.
      Cheap hydrogen can also be used in metallurgy to replace coke.
    10. 0
      17 September 2020 10: 54
      The Grodno region. And the Poles have recently openly declared that Grodno should be in their composition. In the order of delirium: do they want to grab a nuclear power plant for free?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"