Spanish Civil War: cavalry and tanks

46

The first Spanish tank was actually French. The combat value of these vehicles was approaching zero, but the large vertical surfaces of the side armor were very convenient for writing all kinds of slogans! This tank belonged to the POUM soldiers!

The Nazis did not think to stop here. They considered the resistance to be a temporary delay. Carried away by the maneuver, they threw another tanks, more infantry, more aviation... And they suffered great losses on this. Aviation was met by "snub-noses", they drive, shoot down, set fire to "Junkers", frighten and confuse them, forcing them to flee without dropping bombs or dropping them at random, without aiming. Republican cannon tanks were against the German machine-gun tanks. In addition, armored cars work, and they work well. Miguel Martinez is intoxicated in an armored car, he never thought that this car could act so dashingly.
M. Koltsov. Spanish diary


Behind the pages of the civil wars. The rugged terrain characteristic of Spain was convenient for cavalry, since both tanks and aircraft were still not powerful enough to radically change the course of battles.




This one is for the united trade unions!

Until 1936, the Spanish army had one cavalry division, consisting of three brigades. The brigade consisted of two regiments, supported by a battalion of motorcyclists, a company of armored vehicles and a battalion of horse artillery from three batteries of 75-mm guns. The division additionally consisted of four more separate cavalry regiments and another machine-gun squadron. But the particularly exotic units of the Spanish army were the five tabors, units of the Moroccan cavalry, somewhat smaller in number than the battalion. The camp usually consisted of three squadrons of Moroccan cavalry and another Spanish machine-gun squadron.


The third was again the French Renault tank

True, to say that the Spanish horseman was a good representative of his military profession, in general, can only be a stretch. It was an infantryman with a horse and a saber, somehow trained in fencing. The Spanish cavalry squadron was considered the equivalent of an infantry company, but in terms of its firepower it reached only an infantry platoon, and all because the cavalry were armed only with rifles and three pitiful light machine guns. That is why the regiment also included a purely machine-gun squadron and, in addition, a squadron equipped with 40- and 60-mm mortars. Well, then anti-tank and even anti-aircraft guns were added there.


The Germans supplied PzIB light machine-gun tanks to Spain

With the beginning of the mutiny, a significant part of the seven cavalry regiments in the army went over to Franco's side, then one Civil Guard squadron and, of course, all the Moroccan cavalry and several squadrons of the volunteer “Phalanx of Spain” initially devoted to the rebels. The Republicans were supported by three cavalry regiments, then eight squadrons of the Civil Guard, two squadrons of the Guard de Asalto and all the personnel of the training camps, where the cavalrymen were trained.


And also command tanks of this type

Cavalry tactics consisted of supporting infantry brigades in difficult terrain and raiding enemy territory. The cavalry, together with armored vehicles, was also used for reconnaissance and guarding transport convoys. The front line between the Republicans and the Nationalists was stretched over 2,5 miles, so it was also very easy for the cavalry to penetrate through it into the rear of the enemy and commit various "outrages" there.


And this is an Italian gun transporter: Fiat OCI 01 ...


... and Fiat OCI 02

However, in the field, the Spanish cavalry, both from one side and the other, most often acted, being dismounted. They usually acted in platoon or in groups, and the group usually consisted of three or four horsemen. Two groups made up a squad on flat and open open terrain, the squad along the front could be stretched to a distance of 45 meters, that is, about five meters between individual riders. Fire support was provided by squadrons armed with Browning light machine guns. "Light armor" (tankettes with machine guns and flamethrowers) were used to suppress enemy firing points.


And this is how they transported the guns

And here is how one of the internationalists Raymond Sender from the 5th Infantry Regiment, operating in 1937 near Madrid, described the attack of the Moroccan camp.

The Moroccans approached slowly, advancing menacingly in an immense cloud of dust. Looking at this exciting picture, I involuntarily compared them to the army of some Roman emperor arriving for battle. Approaching the range of our artillery shot and rebuilding themselves into battle formation, they launched an attack. Wild screams, volleys of guns, bursts of shrapnel in the air, the screams of the wounded and the neigh of distraught horses - everything was mixed in this hellish cacophony of sounds. After the first volleys, a third of the riders were literally mowed down, others advanced in disarray. When they got closer, among them we saw two tanks armed with machine guns.



In rough terrain and to accompany the cavalry, armored vehicles were often used. For example, our Soviet FAI

The cavalry of the nationalists also acted quite effectively in other places. So, on February 6, 1938, near the town of Alfambra, two brigades of nationalist horsemen from the division of General Monasterio in two ranks and a total of 2000 sabers attacked the positions of the Republican division. The third brigade, along with the Italian CV 3/35 tankettes as support forces, moved behind them in reserve. As a result, the attacked Republican division was completely defeated, lost all artillery, all machine guns and even its field kitchens.


It is clear that different inscriptions immediately appeared on them!

But the usual attack pattern was different from this one. The cavalry moved along with the tanks, very often parallel to the road along which they were walking, so as not to spoil the tracks on the stony Spanish soil. When the forward detachment entered into battle with the enemy, the remaining horsemen immediately dismounted and created a front, behind which batteries of 65-mm guns were deployed. Tanks left the road on the ground and struck from the front, while several cavalry detachments attacked the enemy from the flanks, trying to go to his rear. Having thus blocked the enemy's position, the cavalrymen allowed the rest of the infantry to complete the operation, while they themselves moved on.


Painted them on the ground and usually in the color of the area!

It is worth noting that it was the nationalists who fought in this way. The Republicans, although they were brought up on the best traditions of our own civil war and saw Chapaev's dashing cavalry attacks in the cinema, acted in this way so rarely that none of the sources recorded it! And this happened in conditions when there was no talk of refusing the priority of cavalry as the main striking force of the ground forces, it was not disputed by anyone, since traditional stereotypes were very strong. In the same United States, tank units were called armored cavalry until the very beginning of World War II. In the Red Army, tankers were constantly preparing for action together with the cavalry, which was not even hidden, but on the contrary, was demonstrated in maneuvers! And yet, in Spain, only the Francoists used all this positive experience. Did our military advisers keep their combat experience a secret? No, this is simply impossible. Perhaps something else: nobody listened to them there! For example, here is a telegram received from the Aragonese front to the Minister of War of Spain regarding our military specialists: "A large number of Russian officers in Aragon puts Spanish soldiers in the position of colonized aborigines." That's it, word for word!


But the same nationalists had to paint the captured tanks brightly so that they did not become victims of "friendly fire": the T-26 tank in the nationalist paint job


Although at first the identification "flag" was quite small!

But what about the tanks of Spain itself? Didn't they exist at all? After all, Spain built battleships, even small ones, and a tank is much simpler than any battleship! Well, armored vehicles appeared in Spain back in 1914 (and some samples of armored vehicles were tested back in 1909), when 24 Schneider-Creusot armored cars were purchased in France, large-sized vehicles on the chassis of Paris buses with armor thickness of only 5 mm. 40 hp engine was frankly weak, rear-wheel drive only. Tires are traditionally made of molded rubber. In short, nothing outstanding. True, here the roof was with an A-shaped slope of the armor plates, so that enemy grenades would roll off it.


As a result, both for tanks and armored vehicles BA-3, BA-6 established a single pattern for applying the identification marks of nationalists. Now such vehicles were difficult to confuse with enemy tanks!

A car on a good road could move at speeds up to 35 km / h. Its speed, as well as the cruising range of 75 km, were low. For some reason, there was no permanent armament, but it had six large embrasure hatches on each side, which served for ventilation of the vehicle, and machine guns and arrows could fire through them. The last were 10 people. During the hostilities on the territory of Spanish Morocco, these machines showed themselves well, and they were also used in the civil war!


At first, the "national" armored cars "Bilbao" were painted dark gray, for which they received the nickname "Negrilos". The picture shows the car of the Carabinieri unit

The first Spanish tanks were the CAI Schneider, which arrived in Spain after the end of the First World War from France, and then the famous Renault FT-17, both with machine-gun and cannon armament, in cast and riveted turrets. Control tanks FT-17TSF, with radio stations in the wheelhouse, were also supplied. In a word, it was all French technology, and quite modern, except for the poor "Schneider". However, they also found a place for themselves in the civil war ...


In the course of the war, their coloring became more whimsical. For example, such ...


And so ...

Interestingly, in the 20s, again in France, the Spaniards bought the experimental wheeled-tracked tanks "Saint-Chamon", which they liked, and then wheeled-tracked armored vehicles with rubber-metal tracks "Citroen-Kerpecc-Schneider" R-16 mod. 1929, experienced British Carden-Loyd tankettes, and Italian Fiat 3000 tanks.

But it was only in 1928 that Spain managed to build its own so, work on which had been started two years earlier at the state-owned Trubia plant. The work was supervised by Captain Ruiz de Toledo, and the name of the tank was given the following: "high-speed infantry tank", or "Model Trubia", series "A".


Tank "Trubia"

We decided to release it, like Renault, in machine-gun and cannon versions, and even put our own 40-mm cannon with a firing range of 2060 m and an initial projectile velocity of 294 m / s.

But for some reason, the Spaniards did not succeed in the cannon version, and the tank was armed with three French Hotchkiss infantry machine guns at once with a 7-mm Mauser cartridge. Outwardly, this tank was a bit like Renault, but it also had many "national" differences. For example, it is not clear why a two-tier tower was put on it. Moreover, each tier rotated independently of the other, and in each tier a machine gun was installed - each in a ball mount, which made it possible to change the firing sector of each of them without turning the tower itself. Another machine gun was placed next to the driver in a ledge on the front armor plate. On the roof of the tower, in addition to all its innovations, a stroboscope was also installed. Recall that this device consisted of two cylinders, one inside the other, while the inner cylinder was stationary, but the outer one, driven by an electric motor, rotated at high speed. The outer cylinder had a lot of vertical slots on the surface, so narrow that rifle-caliber bullets could not penetrate through them, but on the surface of the inner cylinder there were viewing windows, covered with bullet-proof glass. When the outer cylinder rotated rapidly, the stroboscopic effect began to operate, the armor of the cylinders seemed to "melt", which made it possible, having thrust the head into a motionless cylinder, to conduct observation from it. At the same time, a 360 ° view was provided, but the stroboscope required a special drive, it often failed, needed good illumination and, as a result, did not take root on the tanks. Above the stroboscope was covered by an armored cap, which also served as a fan. In addition to the third machine gun, in the hull on the sides of the tank there were two ball mounts for firing from a personal weapons.


Artillery tractor "Landes", turned into a tank, and again with a stroboscope!

It is interesting that the designers made the bow of the hull protruding beyond the rim of the caterpillar, and so that it does not rest against anything, they put a narrow roller on it to overcome vertical obstacles. A traditional "tail" was also envisaged, as it was supposed to help to cross the trenches. Unlike Renault, Trubia had the entire chassis reserved. Moreover, it is also closed from above by fenders with bevels. The caterpillar was designed in a very original way. The tracks with their inner surfaces slid along the guide runners inside the reserved track contour, while every second track had a special protrusion covering the same armor outside!

This design of the tracks allowed them to be reliably sheltered from bullets and shell fragments, from dirt and stones, but due to the lack of suspension, it was not very reliable. And the absence of lugs on the tracks greatly reduced the permeability.

In battles, for example, during the defense of Oviedo and at Extremadura, the use of these tanks showed that their machine-gun armament was quite sufficient, although it was inconvenient to use them. But there were very few of them *
On the basis of the Landes artillery tractor, which had a similar chassis with the Trubia, they tried to make an infantry battle tank - Trubia mod. 1936, or (by the name of the funding organization) Trubia-Naval, but the Republicans called it the Euskadi machine.


Tank "Euskadi" or "Trubia-Naval" Republicans

The tank came out just tiny and very light, but, nevertheless, with a crew of three, and for its size and weight it had solid armament, armed with two 7,7 mm Lewis infantry machine guns - one in the tower and one in the hull , both in ball installations. At first there was an idea to equip it with a 47-mm gun in the turret and a machine gun in the hull, but nothing came of it. The tank was used in battles and quite widely. It also fell into the hands of the rebels, but, as in the case of the Trubia, it was released in a minimal amount.


Tank "Euskadi" nationalists

The "Tank Designers Group" in the city of Bardastro in the province of Huesca designed and built the "Bardastro tank". The caterpillars on it were reserved, on the hull there was a cylindrical machine-gun tower. No other information could be found about him.

When in 1937 the command of the nationalists instructed the specialists of the Trubia plant to create an infantry tank superior to both Soviet and Italian-German tanks, those such a tank called CCI "Type 1937" - "infantry battle tank", were able to make and received an order for 30 cars. However, what did they do in the end?


Tank S.S. 1

The chassis was borrowed from the Italian CV 3/35 wedge. Armament, coaxial machine guns "Hotchkiss", were to the right of the driver, and the 20-mm automatic cannon "Brad" mod. 35-20 / 65 - in the tower. The tank had a speed of 36 km / h and a diesel engine. To support the infantry, this was better than the ersatz tanks of the Pz.IA and B, but still, the Spanish engineers did not succeed in surpassing the Soviet T-26s.


Tank "Verdekha"

The next tank, which existed, however, only at the prototype level, was named the "Verdekha infantry tank". Moreover, it was named so in honor of its designer, artillery captain of the nationalist army Felix Verdeh. The development of the machine began in October 1938, and in the spring of 1939 its tests began. This time, the chassis was borrowed from the T-26 tank, but the engine and transmission were installed in the front. The armament consisted of a Soviet 45-mm cannon and a German machine gun "Dreise" MG-13 and was located in the turret located in the rear of the hull. Moreover, the tower was similar to the Pz.I tower, but with a larger armored mask, in which the gun trunnions were fixed. There is a photo where this tank has a cylindrical tower with double doors on both sides. The tank came out about a quarter lower than the Soviet T-26. The turret armor was 16 mm thick, and the frontal hull armor plate was 30 mm thick. There is a photograph in which machine guns are on both sides of the gun barrel, that is, different options for installing weapons were tested on the tank.

The tank "Verdekha" was shown to General Franco, but since the war had already ended, there was no point in releasing it, as well as the SPG at its base.

Tanks "Vickers-6t" in Spain also fought. They were sold to the Republicans in 1937 by the President of Paraguay. These were three tanks of type "A" (machine-gun) and one type "B" - cannon, captured during the war between Paraguay and Bolivia.

The Spaniards also had their own armored car "Bilbao", named after the city in the north of the country where it was produced. He entered service with the carabinieri corps in 1932 and fought in the armies of both republicans and nationalists. 48 of these armored cars were manufactured on the chassis of a Ford 8 mod. 1930, the production of which was established in Barcelona. Armament: one machine gun "Hotchkiss" caliber 8 mm and personal weapons of the shooters, which were located in it quite a lot. By the way, one "Bilbao" "survived" to this day.


UNL-35 in Republican livery

But the armored car UNL-35 or "Union Naval de Levante T-35", named after the plant where it was produced since January 1937, owed its appearance to Soviet engineers Nikolai Alimov and Alexander Vorobyov. They took the chassis of commercial trucks "Chevrolet-1937" and the domestic ZIS-5 and booked them, and also installed weapons: two 7,62-mm machine guns. The nationalists, who also got them as trophies, installed two MG-13s. These vehicles fought on all fronts, earned high marks and ... were in service with the Spanish army even until 1956.


UNL-35 in nationalist livery

On some of these armored vehicles, instead of a machine gun, 37-mm Puteaux cannons were placed in the turret, which were removed from the damaged Renault FT-17 tanks. These BAs fought in Catalonia, but after the defeat of the Republic they fell into the hands of the nationalists. And they put towers on them ... from the destroyed Soviet armored vehicles BA-6 and tanks T-26 and BT-5! So these BAs began to look very much like the Soviet BA-6s, and only close they could be distinguished visually. Two ACC-1937 from Catalonia ended up on the territory of France along with the Republicans who had gone there. In 1940 they were captured by the Germans, named "Jaguar" and "Leopard" and sent to fight on the Eastern Front! The Leopard had a 37mm cannon in its turret, but then it was removed and replaced with a machine gun behind its shield. Both of these armored vehicles were used to fight the partisans, and there is information that they were even captured by the Red Army!

* For example, the Spanish historian Christian Abada Tretera reports that in July 1936 there were only 17 FT-10 tanks - five in a tank regiment in Madrid (Regimiento de Carros de Combate No. 1) and five in Zaragoza (Regimiento de Carros de Combate # 2). There were also four old Schneider tanks in Madrid. Three prototypes of the Trubia tank had the Milan infantry regiment in Oviedo. Two Landes cars - at the Trubia plant in Asturias. There were only 48 armored cars "Bilbao", however, the Republicans had 41 cars.

Note: all drawings of armored vehicles were made by artist A. Sheps.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    20 September 2020 06: 26
    Thank you, Vyacheslav Olegovich. As usual, Shpakovsky on weekends)))
    Wonderful illustrations.
    1. +8
      20 September 2020 07: 29
      This is all Sheps is great! When I saw his "pomovskiy" Schneider, I simply "ran up and down the ceiling with delight," so he copied all the inscriptions!
  2. +6
    20 September 2020 06: 32
    and there is information that they were even captured by units of the Red Army!
    ,,,it was so Yes

    1. +5
      20 September 2020 09: 05
      Here in this photo the inscription "Leopard" is clearly visible:
      1. +4
        20 September 2020 09: 09
        ... and here is the jaguar:

        [Center]

  3. +9
    20 September 2020 06: 48
    ,,, and how history repeats itself?

    The Germans sent four battalions of French volunteers into the decisive attack. Before the battle, they were built on the Borodino field and Field Marshal von Kluge made a speech about how in the days of Napoleon the French and Germans fought here side by side against a common enemy - Russia.

    “The French boldly went into battle, but, unfortunately, could not withstand either a powerful enemy attack, or a severe frost and snowstorm. They have never had to endure such tests before. The French legion was defeated, suffering heavy losses from enemy fire. In a few days he was withdrawn to the rear and sent to the West. "
    General Blumentritt, Chief of Staff of the 4th German Army
    1. +6
      20 September 2020 07: 30
      The last photo, Sergey, together with the above words, is simply brilliant. Thank!
      1. +8
        20 September 2020 08: 52
        Tank Verdeja (Verdeja). On the pedestal at the building of the infantry academy in Toledo.

        and here is another


        Verdeja and t-26

        1. +4
          20 September 2020 09: 11
          I don’t understand something, or did the "Verdeh" have practically an "anti-aircraft" gun elevation angle (fourth photo)?
          1. +4
            20 September 2020 11: 42
            Greetings Anton hi
            The Spanish 45mm cannon was not ready in time for the first prototype, so a 45 46 / 1932mm model of the year with sights from the T-26B was used instead, and the two parallel machine guns were German Dreyse MG-13 from Panzer I. The gun provided 72 ° vertical aiming, which made it possible to use against aircraft, although this has never been tested and without adequate sights it is unlikely that this would be very effective.

            Captain Felix Verdeja, General Luis Orgas Yoldi and Generalisimo Franco
            1. +2
              20 September 2020 12: 01
              Thank you, Sergey! But it could have turned out to be a good anti-aircraft escort vehicle. An idea ahead of its time.
              1. +1
                20 September 2020 15: 32
                Quote: 3x3zsave
                But it could have turned out to be a good anti-aircraft escort vehicle

                yah. This is not serious.

                Quote: 3x3zsave
                An idea ahead of its time.

                what idea exactly?
                1. +1
                  20 September 2020 16: 07
                  I'll start from the back. The idea of ​​escorting military columns on the march, protection from attacking aircraft. This device has two "delusions" in the tower, and quite a "quarter of Shilka".
                  1. +1
                    20 September 2020 16: 31
                    Well, what is the novelty? Is that on a caterpillar track? This is how the idea of ​​the ZSU was born back in WWII .. All there are "pierless", "pier-errow" and others with pure anti-aircraft functionality.
                    1. 0
                      20 September 2020 16: 40
                      The idea is to saturate the troops with mobile armored memory.
        2. +1
          20 September 2020 12: 48
          and here is another


          it's not "yet", Dmitry. These are different verdekhs - in Toledo, the academy has verdekha-2.

  4. +2
    20 September 2020 09: 23
    Republican Trophies
    Republicans inspect a German tank with a machine gun PZ-1.

    more trophies

    1. +3
      20 September 2020 10: 49
      Rich, middle photo - BTska captured by nationalists in Teruel, Emnip. This is "another trophy" of the Francoists, not the Republicans.
      1. +3
        20 September 2020 11: 12
        Thanks for the amendment. As I overlooked, I myself am surprised - because the photo is quite famous. request
        By the way, what's your name? Otherwise it is not convenient to contact you by such a nickname
        1. +4
          20 September 2020 11: 45
          By the way, what's your name?

          Alexander hi
          1. +3
            20 September 2020 12: 05
            Very nice. And me Dmitry hi
    2. +3
      20 September 2020 11: 00
      Rich, I wouldn't call Renault FT-17 "trophies". The parties simply divided eleven FTshek in half - 5 Madrid (+1 from the car school) went to respawns, 5 tanks in Zaragoza - to the Nazis.
      By the way, the Spaniards in 2018 restored one of the FT-17 (republican, purchased in Poland) to a running condition
  5. +1
    20 September 2020 09: 42
    "True, to say that the Spanish horseman was a good representative of his military profession, in general, it is possible only with a stretch. It was an infantryman with a horse and saber, somehow trained in fencing."
    = = = the phrase hurts the eye: correctly "somehow trained to cut." The task of the cavalryman is not to fence, but to cut, they do not fence with a saber.

    "In rough terrain and to escort the cavalry, armored vehicles were often used. For example, our Soviet FAI"
    = = = = FAI could not be used on rough terrain due to its low cross-country ability

    "But the armored car UNL-35 or Union Naval de Levante T-35, named after the plant where it was produced since January 1937, owed its appearance to Soviet engineers Nikolai Alimov and Alexander Vorobyov. They took the chassis of commercial trucks." Chevrolet-1937 "and the domestic ZIS-5 and booked them"
    = = == So on what chassis was the car built: ZIS-5 or Chevrolet-1937?
    1. Alf
      +3
      20 September 2020 10: 03
      Quote: Lewww
      so on what chassis was the car built: ZIS-5 or "Chevrolet-1937

      Most likely on both chassis.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +3
      20 September 2020 11: 35
      So on what chassis was the car built: ZIS-5 or Chevrolet-1937?

      Initially, the ZiS frame was cut. In September 1938, when production had to be moved from Valencia to Elda due to bombing, the chassis of the Ford B8, Chevrolet and some British truck models began to be adapted.
  6. +3
    20 September 2020 10: 22
    For a long time I looked at how the Italian Fiat OCI 01 gun transporter differs from the Fiat OCI 02. I concluded that it all depends on the paint color ...
  7. +3
    20 September 2020 10: 24
    In 1940 they were captured by the Germans, named "Jaguar" and "Leopard" and sent to fight on the Eastern Front!

    The ACC evacuated from Spain were sent for conservation, and when the "strange" war became a "blitzkrieg", they were sent to fight. Seven ACCs (more precisely, AM Chevrolet according to the French classification), as part of two platoons of the 8th squadron, together with the Panars, on June 18-19, covered the withdrawal of troops and refugees across the bridge over the Loire, simultaneously drowning Kleist's Zoldat, who were trying to force the river higher on rubber boats and below the bridge. The surviving wheeled tanks later fought in the rearguard of the 3rd Division, where they were caught by a truce.
    1. +3
      20 September 2020 10: 47
      Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
      Seven ACC

      Sorry, AAC, of ​​course (Autoametralladora-cañón (AAC))
  8. +3
    20 September 2020 11: 31
    owed its appearance to the Soviet engineers Nikolai Alimov and Alexander Vorobyov. They took the chassis of commercial trucks "Chevrolet-1937" and the domestic ZIS-5 and booked them, as well as installed weapons

    well, yes, just like that - they took and booked. Not so simple. The frame of the ZiSa was cut, a central fragment was cut out to reduce the wheelbase - the base of the UNL-35 is 3150 mm, and the ZiS-5 is 3810 mm. The UNL was by no means a product of improvisation such as freak armored products of the Republicans, but a thoughtful machine.
  9. 0
    20 September 2020 11: 59
    that in July 1936 there were only 17 FT-10 tanks - five in a tank regiment in Madrid (Regimiento de Carros de Combate No. 1) and five in Zaragoza (Regimiento de Carros de Combate No. 2).


    +1 at the Central Automotive School in Madrid. Eleven)
    The nationalists had lost theirs by the end of the year, which they did not regret in the least - FT-17 was considered rubbish, the finest hour of which struck in 1925 when landing in the Gulf of Alhusemas during the Reef War. But respawns, on the contrary, used their Polish FTshki on the Northern Front.
  10. +2
    20 September 2020 12: 09
    But the armored car UNL-35 or "Union Naval de Levante T-35", named after the plant where it was produced since January 1937, owed its appearance to Soviet engineers Nikolai Alimov and Alexander Vorobyov. They took the chassis of commercial trucks "Chevrolet-1937" and the domestic ZIS-5 and reserved them, as well as installed weapons: two 7,62-mm machine guns. ..
    On some of these armored vehicles, instead of a machine gun, 37-mm Puteaux cannons were placed in the turret, which were removed from the damaged Renault FT-17 tanks. These BAs fought in Catalonia, but after the defeat of the Republic they fell into the hands of the nationalists. And they put towers on them ... from the damaged Soviet armored vehicles BA-6 and T-26 and BT-5 tanks! So these BAs began to look very much like the Soviet BA-6, and only close they could be distinguished visually.


    It would be necessary to be careful - to an inexperienced reader it may seem that tank turrets were molded on UNLs, although, as I understand, the speech is about AAS. In addition, it is impossible in principle to confuse the two-axle UNL with the BA-6.
  11. +4
    20 September 2020 12: 16
    Thank you, Vyacheslav Olegovich. Very interesting and informative.

    By the way, Mikhail Koltsov, whose words from the book "Spanish Diary" are given in the epigraph, was at that time in Spain as a correspondent for the newspaper "Pravda", which did not prevent him from acting as an unofficial political representative of the USSR leadership under the republican government. Naturally, he took an active part in the events as an organizer of resistance to the rebels, in his reports and publications in the newspaper he branded the "Trotskyists", accusing them of being in the service of the Phalanx and fascism.
    This, however, did not help him very much: in September 1938, the People's Commissar of Internal Affairs of the USSR Yezhov and the head of the GUGB UGB NKVD of the USSR Beria simultaneously "ran into" him.
    Arrested on December 13, 1938, right in the office of the Pravda newspaper.
    Charged with anti-Soviet Trotskyist activities and participation in a counter-revolutionary terrorist organization.
    Included in the firing list No. 137, January 16, 1940. In the list there are 346 names subject to trial as exposed "participants in the conspiracy against the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks and Soviet power."
    Interestingly, the same list contains the names of the entire top leadership of the NKVD of the Yezhov set, removed from their posts and arrested after the "disclosure" in October 1938 of the "fascist conspiracy in the NKVD": Mikhail Frinovsky (with his wife and minor son), Vladimir Tsesarsky Nikolay Fedorov and others, including Nikolai Yezhov himself. Sentenced to be shot on February 1, 1940.
    Executed on February 2.
    1. +2
      20 September 2020 13: 23
      By the way, the main Spanish communist Jose Antonio Martinez wrote a denunciation against him to Stalin - he was also a viper there. And on Pavlov ... But on his return from Spain, Stalin for some reason did not touch him, and even ... elevated him. They slapped him later, remembering Spanish affairs!
      1. +1
        20 September 2020 14: 48
        Quote: kalibr
        By the way, the main Spanish communist Jose Antonio Martinez wrote a denunciation against him to Stalin - he was also a viper there. And on Pavlov ... But on his return from Spain, Stalin for some reason did not touch him, and even ... elevated him. They slapped him later, remembering Spanish affairs!

        Absolutely.

        In general, many "Spaniards" were put up against the wall. Basically, according to standard articles - espionage, Trotskyism, conspiracies. They were afraid of them. Potential conspirators. From sin further.
        Immediately after the outbreak of the Civil War, foreign "aid" poured into Spain to the opposing sides. Italy, Germany and Portugal openly supported the regime of General Franco and introduced their military units to Spain, organizing the supply of weapons and military equipment.
        The republican government turned to the governments of European countries and the League of Nations for military assistance.
        In response to this, on the initiative of England, a "Non-intervention Committee" was created, which included 27 countries, including France, Germany, Italy, the Soviet Union and other countries.
        And although in fact neither the USSR nor other countries stopped military assistance to Spain, they all signed the Non-Interference Act, one of the clauses of which obliged them to consider all foreign “volunteers” who participated in the Spanish Civil War as criminals... Including our own citizens.
        And although officially, of course, such accusations were never made against their own internationalists in the USSR, many of them, upon their return to Russia, were subjected to repression and shot.
      2. +2
        20 September 2020 19: 20
        They slapped him later, remembering Spanish affairs!

        They slapped him for the fact that the Germans made a deep breakthrough in our defense precisely in his area of ​​responsibility - in Belarus. For some reason, this did not happen either to the north or to the south, but here the whole division was blocked in the Brest fortress, instead of being in summer camps.
  12. +2
    20 September 2020 13: 09
    Very interesting article, well illustrated! Thanks to the author! hi
    I learned a lot of new things! I was especially surprised by the "Verdech" Tank! Probably a very successful design would have turned out if it was finalized to the end.
  13. +3
    20 September 2020 13: 47
    Well, since the author has such a hodgepodge of armor, then I should also mention Сarro IGC Sadurni.In essence, it was an armored vehicle based on the Benah tractor (a favorite machine of republican tank builders for improvisation). But the Spaniards themselves, of course, proudly called it "tank").
    There was an option with an armored jacket and a hotchkiss in a ball mount:

    as well as an artillery conveyor with a six-seater open body:

    It seems that this masterpiece coped with towing a 155mm howitzer, but considering the 46-horsepower gasoline engine, I think he did it to the limit of his strength)
    1. Alf
      +3
      20 September 2020 21: 20
      Quote: Paragraph Epitafievich Y.
      It seems that this masterpiece coped with towing a 155mm howitzer, but considering the 46-horsepower gasoline engine, I think he did it to the limit of his strength)

      Probably, the calculation also pushed. laughing
  14. +2
    20 September 2020 14: 08
    In this whole cabinet of curiosities, the most mysterious specimen remains Carro Barbastro)
    Even such an authority on Spanish armor as Javier Mazarras has very little information about this unique one. It is only known that the only completed copy even managed to get to the Aragon front and there, it seems, to fight) There are no drawings, no information, or any clear photos of this car.

  15. +2
    20 September 2020 14: 26
    And this is an Italian gun transporter: Fiat OCI 01 ...


    More precisely, this is the Fiat OCI 708CM.


    The Italians delivered fifty tractors to Spain, and, of course, one copy already in the summer of 1937 was tested at the NIIABT test site)


  16. +3
    20 September 2020 14: 53
    Cavalry tactics was to support infantry brigades in hard-to-reach terrain and raids on enemy territory.
    These are not tactics, but combat missions.
    I want to note that the author does not describe the tactics of cavalry in that war clearly enough, apparently he did not understand it well
    The rugged terrain characteristic of Spain was perfect for equestrian fighters,
    let me disagree with the author: flat terrain is the most favorable for cavalry actions, which was clearly demonstrated by the events of the Civil War in Russia
  17. +4
    20 September 2020 16: 24
    Well, armored vehicles appeared in Spain back in 1914 (and some samples of armored vehicles were tested back in 1909), when 24 Schneider-Creusot armored cars were purchased in France, large-sized vehicles on the chassis of Paris buses with armor thickness of only 5 mm.


    Vyacheslav, hello hi You meant this "miracle of technology"?

    Thanks for the article - as always interesting. good
    1. +1
      20 September 2020 17: 56
      Well, yes, only I did not find his drawing, unlike you!
  18. 0
    21 September 2020 00: 24
    The Internet broadcasts about 2 dozen ACC-1937 that came to France. But it is probably no longer possible to find out the exact number of such machines.
  19. 0
    21 September 2020 12: 20
    I wonder what inscriptions were on the other side of Saint-Chamon.
  20. 0
    4 November 2020 11: 47
    The technical drawings of the armored vehicles are excellent! And the stories are interesting.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"