New issue of Besogon discusses protests in Belarus and the story of Navalny

39
New issue of Besogon discusses protests in Belarus and the story of Navalny

The next release of the program of the famous director Nikita Mikhalkov "Besogon TV" was released on the network. The author of the program decided to call this issue "Anthology of Falsehood." The material is devoted to current events, including the protests in Belarus and the situation related to the state of health and the alleged poisoning of Alexei Navalny by Novichok.

Nikita Mikhalkov, talking about the Belarusian political agenda, says that he cannot support Alexander Lukashenko and largely agrees with the protesters.



Program author:

True, I have a different starting point in this regard: he is the wrong partner. He says one thing today, another tomorrow. That is, the Union State, then no.

Mikhalkov notes that by the time of the elections, Lukashenka had a power euphoria, when he lost touch with reality and stopped feeling reality, began to lose his shores.

At the same time, Besogon also considers the issue of crowd aggression during protests - with attacks on police officers, the appearance of people with Molotov cocktails.

The program shows fragments of interviews with modern youth at the Yeltsin Center. Also in the issue of "Besogon" is shown a screen of one of News on "Voennoye Obozreniye", when one of the issues was either removed from the air of VGTRK, then postponed to another time.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    39 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +5
      13 September 2020 08: 42
      Another patrician, sitting in a laurel wreath, and admiring his reflection in the mirror, about an ungrateful people ...
      1. +10
        13 September 2020 08: 50
        I especially liked the Yeltsin Center - didn't he himself poured buckets of slop on WWII with his films? Isn't it his studio Trite filming handshake fakes for history? Wasn't he himself sucking on Goskino? What kind of habit is to see the reason in a stupid, stupid people, and not in the power, to which he himself partly belongs? Why do they not see the mistakes of the authorities in education, in teaching history, in the distribution of public goods? Why are you showing interviews of ordinary people At the Yeltsin Center. Show interviews with those who created it, who pour more money into it every year than into the Tretyakov Gallery. No, there will not be such interviews in his transmission. After all, this ignorant people misunderstands everything, and it is not the government who clogs its head with slops in 24/7 mode.
        1. -2
          13 September 2020 08: 56
          And this is the one who, like a gentleman, through all the solid under the flashing lights, turns around, spitting on the slaves, who refused to teach the people next door? And then he'll spit from above - it's not your servile business to condemn me for it. This is the one who will teach the real estate of the Union of Cinematographers everything for their commercial activities?
          Correctly one white general issued an order that coachmen, prostitutes and artists should not be shot, for they will serve as weather vane of any power! This one of them is. And he's not a coachman, that's for sure.
        2. +1
          13 September 2020 08: 57
          Dear, who are you?
          The situation is simple, don't like it, don't look, what's the problem? He leads his point of view, you lead yours, start a channel, make content. Tongue wagging - do not roll bags.
          1. -6
            13 September 2020 09: 00
            Oh, yes, I forgot ... only he can have his own point of view. You have a strange logic, you can speak to someone, but not to someone. As it will be there by your analogy - do not like it - do not read. I humbly apologize (no)
          2. +1
            13 September 2020 10: 26
            What is the simplicity of the situation? Mikhalkov, having the initial data, argues like a director. He has a pretty good storyline! First, the plot is about your beloved. Mikhalkov is not guilty of anything! But Lukashenka has a sin! Does he know all the details of Lukashenka and Putin? Lukashenka is two-faced !? And Mikhalkov himself? Forgot the cuttings attack? But the plot about an unhappy and beaten girl coolly shows the essence of the opposition! The same can be said about our common opposition from the 90s! I liked the photos of the opposition. An interesting interview with Steinmeier and the young. Correctly said about the future of the AUE members. The current bandits are raising their own replacements. Those who do not want to be a member of the AUE can become the right citizens after visiting the EBN Center (well, or after studying modern history). Well, or oppositionists like Navalny! Only Navalny is a rather strange opposition leader! How much does he owe?
            Yevgeny Prigozhin bought out the debt of opposition leader Alexei Navalny, his associate Lyubov Sobol and the Anti-Corruption Fund from the Moscow School Food Factory. Now they will have to pay 88 million rubles personally to the businessman.
            Is Prigogine the Roof for Navalny?
            Speaking about the goals of the deal, Prigozhin stressed that he wants to "undress and shoe the members of this group of unscrupulous people." The businessman said that he would stop the persecution only if the defendant dies. "Of course, if Comrade Navalny gives his soul to God, then personally I do not intend to persecute him in this world," - Concorde reports his words.
            Operation ** Cover **? Does Navalny have any debts? Traveling abroad allowed? Here the Germans fork out and take them to Germany! So Navalny is also a German agent? They bring him to the ** Sharite ** clinic where doctors rummage around in toxic substances! The Germans also have Operation ** Cover **? And what about Mikhalkov? Cooperation with the owner of the channel ** Tsargrad ** - Malofeev? Is this the correct opposition? After the collapse of the Union, was Mikhalkov's position erroneous? The reason for Mikhalkov's opposition to power? So there is still opposition to the Kremlin today ?! And she is not one of the poor people! What does this opposition want? The same as in Ukraine? Or is it really for the interests of Russia? So the situation is far from simple! And we? And here we are expressing our point of view and do not move the bags at all.
    2. +5
      13 September 2020 08: 43
      No matter how you say it, no matter how you scold Mikhalkov, he is partly right.
      1. -4
        13 September 2020 09: 31
        Quote: Don Karleone
        No matter how you say it, no matter how you scold Mikhalkov, he is partly right.

        This is called mind manipulation or neurolinguistic programming or brainwashing.
        1. +5
          13 September 2020 09: 40
          Quote: Sergey39
          Quote: Don Karleone
          No matter how you say it, no matter how you scold Mikhalkov, he is partly right.

          This is called mind manipulation or neurolinguistic programming or brainwashing.

          Well, Sergey, after your simple and clear explanation winked , I really wanted to watch this episode (although there, my mother is dear, as much as 54 minutes what )
          1. -4
            13 September 2020 12: 51
            Quote: Clear
            Well, Sergey, after your simple and understandable explanation, I really wanted to watch this episode (although there, my mother is dear, as much as 54 minutes

            I do not advise. All videos from YouTube on near-political topics are pure NLP.
            1. +4
              13 September 2020 15: 38
              Quote: Sergey39
              Quote: Clear
              Well, Sergey, after your simple and understandable explanation, I really wanted to watch this episode (although there, my mother is dear, as much as 54 minutes

              I do not advise. All videos from YouTube on near-political topics are pure NLP.

              Yes, he says everything in Besogon correctly! Yes Well, who is he, by way of life, a gentleman, a patrician or an uncle Styopa a policeman, this is secondary and does not matter. It seems indecent to pry.
      2. -2
        13 September 2020 09: 57
        Quote: Don Karleone
        No matter how you say it, no matter how you scold Mikhalkov, he is partly right.

        His correctness, as it always "strange" way, coincides with the opinion of the authorities, and anyone, be it the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Yeltsin or Putin.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 0
      13 September 2020 09: 01
      The master will deign to talk about politics ...
      How can this bearer be listened to, let alone trust ...
      1. +7
        13 September 2020 14: 52
        How can this bearer be listened to, let alone trust ...

        Oleg, welcome! hi This "master" is the "devil" engaged in "self-expulsion" in the format of an endless "soap opera". Of course, no success.
    5. -1
      13 September 2020 09: 11
      Grandfather, go to the dacha to rest already, he is sitting
    6. Cat
      +6
      13 September 2020 09: 23
      When I see Mikhalkov, for some reason I always remember Gaft's epigram on their family:

      Russia, do you hear a strange itch?
      Three Mikhalkov are crawling over you
    7. +2
      13 September 2020 09: 52
      it is of course-BARIN, but correctly gutarite bastard! -type imperial!
    8. +3
      13 September 2020 09: 57
      Yesterday I watched Besogon on the SpasTV channel. There was an acute feeling of disgust for Mikhalkov.
      It was not for nothing that Kolchak put artists and prostitutes on a par.
    9. +11
      13 September 2020 10: 46
      Mikhalkov not like it? Me too. But what he conveyed in this issue of Besogon is 100% true, I like it. And this is the main point.
      1. 0
        13 September 2020 10: 58
        Yes, it's not about WHAT he says, but about WHO saying it. It's like a rapist will condemn a rapist, and a corrupt official will fight corruption. Again, just ask yourself a question - why does he criticize people at the EBN Center, and not those who built it, finances, supervises (look, by the way, who is on the board of trustees of the center). Why is a respected director afraid to be puzzled by this question?
        1. +5
          13 September 2020 11: 06
          And what has the personality? When a candidate for membership in the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee Yeltsin B.N. struggled with "guiding and directing" his personality and his whole life canceled out his struggle? Or the example of Yakovlev, editor-in-chief of the Kommunist magazine? Or an example of a pony Grybauskaite?
          1. -3
            13 September 2020 11: 11
            Hypocrisy. Duplicity. This is the point. In fact, these people do not fight for anyone other than themselves. Your power, your money. These people wrote odes to Lenin yesterday, then they tore up their membership cards in front of the crowd, urgently learned to play tennis, then urgently in judo and night hockey, just not to come off the trough.
            But in fact, they do not care about Belarus, Navalny, EBN Centers and so on. If you remove their beautiful, correct words, what will remain in the bottom line?
            1. +2
              13 September 2020 11: 16
              Again. I don't give a damn about the personality, the views change. I'm talking about the fact that "something has rotted in the Danish kingdom," and you mean that he does not greet the old women at the entrance.
              1. +2
                13 September 2020 11: 24
                No, I mean that one of the leaders of the oxidation process talks about the problems of a rotten kingdom, and certainly not about greeting old women.
                And about the change of views .... I remembered an anecdote from Soviet times, where in the answer to the questionnaire about whether he changed his political views, it is written - "hesitated, but only together with the Party's line"
                1. +2
                  13 September 2020 18: 01
                  As hesitated as he was, in this episode he told the truth. This is the whole point, and you mean that it was said "unworthy" - does it change something in the described situation?
                  1. -1
                    13 September 2020 18: 37
                    Sorry, but:
                    1. Where did you see me such an epithet as "unworthy", since you are already quoting this word?
                    2. I think I will repeat the answer to a similar question not two or three times, but twenty more times, you will not hear. But let's try, for the last time and in more detail: who is there talking about the indignation of the Belarusians - the one who takes pictures of how the always drunk Soviet nkvdshniki shoot everyone in the back? The one who takes pictures of how the Red Army men crush each other with cars for the sake of the crossing, the one who simply led the veterans in the mud with the face of the veterans, broadcasting about how they handled with the Ssov ?! The one who, splitting with a flashing light in continuous, in the end, was also offended by those who made remarks to his regal person? Didn't he get the euphoria of the crown for an hour? I repeat - well, this master does not ask himself the question of who and why authorized the construction of the Yeltsin Center. Which does not ask the question of why this center is financed better than the Tretyakov Gallery. Why doesn't she criticize the deputy prime ministers who are on the board of trustees of the center !? Why won't he talk about how, foaming at the mouth, supported Yeltsin in the 96 elections?
                    And here this gentleman sits, who threw out millions of budget dollars through the TriTe on the topic of our history and speaks the right words ... and let him say other right words that were beneficial at that moment to the same Yeltsin, let him years later says the next correct words, beneficial to the next power ... but after all, they are so correct and it does not matter that this correctness for him is no more than a convenient weather vane, it is important that you like his words, which means you can afford to forget about him past correct words, and even more so about his deeds, actions. But my memory is a little better, apparently.
                    1. +1
                      14 September 2020 00: 09
                      It was wet on the stake. My first words - I do not like Mikhalkov. Whether you love him does not matter. Good night.
            2. +4
              13 September 2020 16: 13
              Quote: RUnnm
              Hypocrisy. Duplicity. This is the point

              Gathered everything in a heap. Some kind of new concept that hypocrisy and duplicity are the essence belay
              The fact that you do not like Mikhalkov was clear from the first post.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. +4
                  13 September 2020 16: 32
                  Quote: RUnnm
                  .... just like any other hypocrite.

                  One way or another, but each of us is to some extent a hypocrite.

        2. +5
          13 September 2020 16: 04
          Quote: RUnnm
          It's not about WHAT he says

          Why are you twisting? A new release of the Besogon TV show is also being discussed. Namely, his theme. And here
          Quote: RUnnm
          about who is it talking about?
    10. 0
      13 September 2020 11: 03
      He should first expel the demon from himself.
    11. +3
      13 September 2020 13: 34
      thanks)) good transfer!
    12. +2
      13 September 2020 17: 46
      Also in the issue of "Besogon" is shown a screen of one of the news on the "Military Review"

      Nikita Sergeevich, if you are here on the forum, I would like to take this opportunity to say hello! hi good
    13. +1
      13 September 2020 19: 16
      I respect Mikhalkov, I look at Besogon - I wish the opposition health and long life.
    14. 0
      14 September 2020 09: 35
      Yes. The girls selflessly sing "Oh, yes, the steppe is wide." I love listening to Mikhalkov. In order to think. There are no questions about Navalny. In Belarus, too. Along with fakes, there are privatizers drooling for state property. Directors indirectly participate in strikes. Probably there were promises. If you were a director, you will become the owner. Around the world there are forest fires. Beatings by parents of almost infants. Such fires are blazing in the minds of ordinary citizens. It would seem that Operation Mockingbird has something to do with it. I am sure. Has.
    15. 0
      14 September 2020 09: 40
      This issue contains history polls among students. A miracle in feathers. But they all got it not anywhere else, but in Russian schools, in movies, in books, in videos.
    16. +2
      14 September 2020 11: 43
      Looked ... And I watch it regularly. I am ambiguous about Nikita Sergeevich, but I have to admit that he asks the right questions, and the most important thing is his indifference.
      1. 0
        14 September 2020 18: 13
        Listen to Navalny, well, after all, it is, he says correctly. Listen to Mikhalkov, he also speaks correctly. Horror.
        1. +1
          15 September 2020 08: 47
          I don't know about you, but I have a completely unambiguous attitude to Navalny. And everything that is happening to him now, only confirms it.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"