British Defense Secretary denies rumors that the country will completely get rid of tanks

35

Last month, sensational claims began to emerge in Britain that the Department of Defense plans to mothball Tanks... One of the newspapers where such rumors were published was The Times. At the same time, experts, commenting on these statements for the media, noted that Britain was the first country to use tanks at one time, and may become the first country to refuse their use.

Today, UK Defense Secretary Ben Wallace denies rumors that the British army is going to completely abandon the use of tanks.

In an interview with the BBC, Wallace said the media "misunderstood the idea." According to the minister, we are not talking about the complete conservation of tanks, but the idea of ​​abandoning "some of the most outdated military equipment to free up funds for investment programs in cyber and space technologies."

Ben Wallace:

We are planning to make a kind of shift towards the deployment of British armed forces around the world - to protect the interests of Great Britain and our allies. For example, our Typhoon squadron will be deployed to Qatar to ensure the safety of the 2022 FIFA World Cup.

According to Wallace, Britain "will go for some reduction in the number of Challenger tanks, but do not plan to get rid of all of them."
Wallace:

We will not dispose of all the tanks of the British army, and we will make sure that the ones that we contained are up to date, operational. Our army must correspond to the level of the XXI century.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    35 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. -1
      12 September 2020 15: 46
      But where else can they reduce that - according to our concepts, they have barely enough tanks for one division .. Same to me - a great power ..
      1. 0
        12 September 2020 15: 54
        Quote: paul3390
        then - according to our concepts, they have barely enough tanks for one division ..

        In general, why do they need them?
        Drive the giants?
        1. 0
          12 September 2020 16: 03
          At least so that at least someone would pay attention to their great-power show-off ..
          1. +2
            12 September 2020 16: 14
            And spend money on maintaining a pile of scrap metal they don't need?
          2. mvg
            +2
            12 September 2020 18: 59
            so that at least someone would pay attention to their great-power show-off

            Look at the fleet. Who will land on their islands? And colonial problems do not threaten them either.
            Their fleet is stronger than our Northern, the strongest we have. And more modern.
            Why do they need MBT? Fundamentally?
        2. +1
          12 September 2020 16: 12
          It is only we who can disperse tanks and shoot at the white house ... Black page in our history ... well, EBN did not bite
          Quote: Lipchanin
          To drive migrants?
          1. +2
            12 September 2020 16: 16
            Quote: Split
            Only we can disperse the tanks and shoot at the white house ..

            And in China people were crushed with tanks
            1. -1
              12 September 2020 16: 18
              Yes, we also ... I really don't understand these people who went to bed under the goose
              1. -1
                12 September 2020 16: 21
                Yes, or alcohol, or crap in my head
            2. mvg
              -2
              12 September 2020 19: 02
              people were crushed by tanks

              These are those "onizhedets"? People at home, after work, sit, swallow nests are cooked, and not hanging around at demonstrations
        3. +1
          12 September 2020 16: 19
          Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan - the British fought quite actively as part of multinational contingents.
          They estimate their own capabilities rather modestly, for example, in 2015, they could allocate up to 30 thousand people from the l / s BA to invade a foreign country, subject to achieving victory in 8-10 weeks.
          1. -1
            12 September 2020 16: 23
            Well, they didn't carry tanks there.
            1. +3
              12 September 2020 16: 31
              Dragged to Kosovo and Iraq (2003 - 2010).
              1. 0
                12 September 2020 16: 40
                How much did it cost
                1. -1
                  12 September 2020 16: 41
                  That's right, women are still giving birth laughing In this I fully support the aspirations of the leading circles of England.
                  1. 0
                    12 September 2020 16: 44
                    Yes, even if they start divisions, I will not pay laughing
                    1. 0
                      12 September 2020 22: 44
                      Quote: Lipchanin
                      Yes, even if they start divisions, I will not pay laughing

                      Why then write?
                      In general, why do they need them?
      2. +1
        12 September 2020 16: 29
        And why did they have to surrender the second tank division on the island? For the Scots? If they decide to separate on a new one ... Or block the tunnel under the English Channel so that the Arabs do not leak?
      3. 0
        12 September 2020 17: 25
        This is how the minister excused himself.
        In general, a great plan! All British tanks are scrapped good
      4. -1
        12 September 2020 23: 03
        Quote: paul3390
        But where else can they cut it - according to our concepts, they barely have tanks for one division ...

        Almost guessed ... but on the other hand, the permanent composition, and imagine any combined-arms armies as part of one division or several brigades ...
    2. +5
      12 September 2020 15: 47
      He apparently read the comments on VO wassat
      1. +3
        12 September 2020 16: 48
        Quote: Split
        He apparently read the comments on VO wassat

        No, he basically doesn't read them, but he knows exactly what they write on VO laughing
        1. +1
          12 September 2020 16: 49
          And I lived in Yasnoye laughing
          1. +3
            12 September 2020 16: 53
            Quote: Split
            And I lived in Yasnoye laughing

            Fine wink Hello hi
            1. +1
              12 September 2020 16: 57
              Did you live in Yasnoye? winked
              1. +2
                12 September 2020 17: 00
                Quote: Split
                Did you live in Yasnoye? winked

                Anatoly, only in image and name.
                1. +1
                  12 September 2020 17: 02
                  Sorry recourse The town is small, I knew everyone ... But I also try to be like that lol
                  1. +2
                    12 September 2020 17: 05
                    Quote: Split
                    But I try to be like that too

                    See you Yes ... You must be led!
                    1. +1
                      12 September 2020 17: 08
                      Thank you! It seems to be lucky lately ...
                      ZY True, 15 years ago, when the Dnieper was flying overhead with heptyl ... I decided to leave. Not rogozin, I don't remember who, they wanted to build a cosmodrome there with the words "everything here will turn into a desert"
                      1. +3
                        12 September 2020 17: 13
                        Quote: Split
                        Thank you! It seems to be lucky lately.

                        Keep it up! good
                        1. 0
                          12 September 2020 17: 16
                          Pasipki! It's hard to meet a positive person these days love
    3. +2
      12 September 2020 15: 52
      What a pity...
    4. -2
      12 September 2020 15: 52
      will be deployed in Qatar to ensure the safety of the 2022 FIFA World Cup.

      Oh how, a sportsman
      But how is he going to provide aviation security?
    5. -1
      12 September 2020 16: 26
      In short, everything is translated from political to public, something like this - they say we will not cut all the tanks at once, but as they complete m-mm-m catharsis. Well, there is no money in Britain for tanks ... they would have kept a semblance of a fleet with aviation on the island ..
      1. +1
        12 September 2020 22: 58
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        Well, Britain has no money for tanks ..

        Why such an opinion, they do not send the troops from storage to the troops from the storage of the "Chiefs" and "Challengers-1", passing them off as new tanks within the framework of the "update of the Armed Forces", all the tanks "Challenger-2" (i.e. one type, and not like ours) and they will soon be replaced by a new modification, incl. with a German gun ...
        on the island they would have kept a semblance of a fleet with aviation ..

        The Navy and the Air Force do not need a resemblance to them, the strongest and most importantly combat-ready in Europe, after us of course ...
        Well, their tasks are not as global as those of our Armed Forces ...
        ASW in the North Atlantic and the strengthening of the air forces of NATO countries in Europe ... they have no plans to launch any tank armadas to the Volga ...

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"