Military Review

The Irkutsk Strategic Missile Forces division is fully re-equipped with mobile complexes "Yars"

68
The Irkutsk Strategic Missile Forces division is fully re-equipped with mobile complexes "Yars"

Another missile unit of the Strategic Missile Forces has completed rearmament with new intercontinental missiles. According to the press service of the Defense Ministry, the Irkutsk missile division has been completely re-equipped with Yars complexes.


The delegation of the Public Council under the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation made a working trip to the easternmost unit of the Strategic Missile Forces - the Irkutsk Missile Division. This unit is fully re-equipped with the Yars mobile missile system

- said in a statement.

In May, the head of the combat training department of the Strategic Missile Forces, Viktor Fotyuk, announced that by the end of the year two regiments of the Barnaul division of the Strategic Missile Forces would also be rearmed with the Yars complexes.

Earlier, the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces Sergey Karakaev deciphered the name of the Yars ICBM: "Nuclear deterrent missile."

The Yars missile system replaces in the Strategic Missile Forces the Topol ICBMs that are being removed from service, which have already exhausted their guaranteed operational life. By the end of 2019, the troops received more than 150 launchers of the Yars complex in mine and mobile versions. Every year the Strategic Missile Forces receives about 20 launchers and systems supporting them.

In total, the Strategic Missile Forces, according to the Ministry of Defense, have three missile armies, 12 missile divisions, of which four are with silo launchers and eight are with mobile missile systems.

PC-24 "Yars" is a Russian strategic missile system with a solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile mobile and mine based with a multiple warhead. The defeat range is declared at 11 thousand kilometers.
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alien From
    Alien From 9 September 2020 15: 17 New
    10
    Sincere congratulations to the missilemen. One hope for strategic nuclear forces!
    1. Imperial Technocrat
      Imperial Technocrat 9 September 2020 15: 24 New
      16
      Why only at strategic nuclear forces? Our conventional army is very strong, and tactical nuclear weapons are at an outstanding level.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Nastia makarova
          Nastia makarova 9 September 2020 15: 54 New
          +5
          a few more cons and say goodbye to you)))
          1. Wwk7260
            Wwk7260 9 September 2020 15: 56 New
            -30
            The robot Nastya does not sleep!
            1. Wwk7260
              Wwk7260 9 September 2020 16: 01 New
              -29
              wow! I missed all posts, and also slapped a warning for ... the letter U! ORU! from this chick!
            2. Nastia makarova
              Nastia makarova 9 September 2020 16: 17 New
              +3
              I am watching you
              1. Wwk7260
                Wwk7260 9 September 2020 16: 20 New
                -23
                Robot! Is it mate? laughing
                everything is clear with you, perverts!
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
                    Sidor Amenpodestovich 9 September 2020 17: 18 New
                    +4
                    Why are you hanging around here?
                  2. Incvizitor
                    Incvizitor 9 September 2020 17: 59 New
                    +3
                    Then move the matzah to your ear and tell there how good fshatsk contractors shoot Afghan weddings and train igils, you seem uncomfortable with normal people ...
          2. Romka47
            Romka47 10 September 2020 16: 28 New
            0
            Do they demolish for a certain number of minuses or is it you figuratively? Purely curiosity, in my opinion, my comrades met with 50 minuses, or I'm wrong
            1. Nastia makarova
              Nastia makarova 11 September 2020 07: 56 New
              +1
              seems to be after -25k minuses are removed))))
        2. kot423
          kot423 9 September 2020 15: 54 New
          +5
          With 404 you know better. You try not to knock on the keyboard from the couch, but come to a part of the contract soldiers and say the same thing in your voice. Is it stupid?
          1. Wwk7260
            Wwk7260 9 September 2020 16: 04 New
            -26
            malignant infatuation of the brain with Ukraine is not curable
            1. Incvizitor
              Incvizitor 9 September 2020 18: 10 New
              +5
              Well, at least they started to write this education with a small letter ... already progress.
        3. Aleksandr1971
          Aleksandr1971 9 September 2020 16: 36 New
          0
          It is a pity to disagree with you, Imperial Technocrat, but having discarded emotions in the statement Wwk7260 (Wwk), we must admit that he is closer to the truth than you.

          An army is strong or weak only in comparison with the enemy. We are not opposing Costa Rica or Mongolia. Our enemy is NATO. Compared to NATO's conventional forces, our conventional forces are very weak, and can only create very short-term and very local superiority in forces.
          1. Aleksandr1971
            Aleksandr1971 9 September 2020 16: 37 New
            +2
            But the news about Yars is certainly good.
          2. Oleg123219307
            Oleg123219307 9 September 2020 17: 59 New
            +8
            Quote: Aleksandr1971
            It is a pity to disagree with you, Imperial Technocrat, but having discarded emotions in the statement Wwk7260 (Wwk), we must admit that he is closer to the truth than you.

            An army is strong or weak only in comparison with the enemy. We are not opposing Costa Rica or Mongolia. Our enemy is NATO. Compared to NATO's conventional forces, our conventional forces are very weak, and can only create very short-term and very local superiority in forces.

            You can argue. The whole question is in the tasks set. If we start from the postulate that the goal of the RF Armed Forces is to seize the world through a large-scale non-nuclear conflict with all NATO countries and seize their territory, then yes, from this point of view, our conventional forces will hardly be able to fulfill the task. In the end, we have a ratio of more than 10 to 1 in terms of population and 20 to 1 in terms of the military budget with the total potential of the NATO bloc. On the other hand, if we approach the tasks facing the RF Armed Forces more realistically, they boil down to 3 things. 1) Prevent even attempts to seize our territory and / or conduct hostilities on it by any external forces, without the threat of causing unacceptable damage to such forces. As we can see, our Armed Forces are coping with this task quite successfully, because despite all the screams, sanctions and other stench, there is nothing who wants to start talking seriously about the seizure of the same Crimea, except of course some Ukrainian leaders, well, the Turchinovs, Eggs, Napoleons and other inhabitants of the yellow house do not count in such things ... From a practical point of view, the entire NATO bloc will not have enough armored vehicles to carry out a successful invasion without massive airstrikes and overwhelming air supremacy, since we are significantly superior to NATO in terms of the total number of tanks, self-propelled guns, armored vehicles and other things. And with air support, they are generally not happy. We do not have significant forces that would allow us to seize air supremacy over Europe, but at the same time there is more than enough so that not a single NATO aircraft is closer than 200 km to our borders. And from such a range, only some of the most advanced cruise missiles can be operated, which is expensive, not particularly effective, and, in principle, does not attract total air domination. 2) Carrying out special measures and actions of expeditionary forces in the territories of neighboring states and / or helping the allies. As can be seen from the events in Syria and Crimea, the RF Armed Forces are more than capable of doing this. At least in the same Syria, forces that are an order of magnitude inferior to the American contingent in the Middle East have achieved more in three years than the Americans in fifteen. The ratio of losses in such operations also indicates a serious superiority over potential adversaries in such countries, both technologically and in the quality of training of fighters. 3) In the event of the start of large-scale hostilities, the RF Armed Forces will have to ensure the combat stability of the elements of the Strategic Missile Forces until the launch. I hope no one here doubts that our army will hold out against ANY attack for 15-20 minutes, even though all NATO troops will attack at the same time. Well, then, in the next world, all of us will probably already be slightly unimportant who won. We have two and a half thousand warheads, about the same they have. And to intercept that we can, that they can 20-25 percent ... The total energy output is enough to make Antarctica the most developed and populated continent in one day. Everyone understands this, so no one rocks the boat. So for what tasks is our army not enough?
            1. Romka47
              Romka47 10 September 2020 16: 32 New
              0
              Clearly, point by point, neither add nor subtract good
          3. Imperial Technocrat
            Imperial Technocrat 10 September 2020 14: 34 New
            +1
            It only seems to all scum that our Armed Forces are weak. Indeed, the US cannot defeat Russia even in a purely conventional conflict. Another thing is that even in a conventional conflict, it is desirable to use TNW for the sake of saving, first of all, human resources. You need to think about saving people
        4. Zhan
          Zhan 9 September 2020 16: 47 New
          +1
          Quote: Wwk7260
          conventional RF, complete sucks of # analogueGovnets #, every year the conscription is reduced, contract servicemen are mostly muddy lumpenized personalities, drunkenness is flourishing there, a disgusting attitude towards military equipment, and other phenomena! what ... put on contractors? contemplated on the USA? but there is a completely different story, and there are good contractors, but we have EVIL!

          Did you think well? Are you thinking of traveling on 18-19 year old boys with a service life of one year?
          But the technique is more and more complicated, more technological, requires certain qualifications. The army should serve people trained, literate, and most importantly by vocation. But just the same one-year call and allows you to identify guys suitable for military affairs. One out of a hundred will remain, already a result.
          1. mvg
            mvg 9 September 2020 17: 10 New
            +3
            The army should serve people trained, literate, and most importantly by vocation

            I have three classmates entered the military. All three canceled their contracts as soon as they received housing. I think there are more examples. There are also military friends, everyone has left, although the salary level, plus the benefits are very decent. The nephew is studying in the military, but he does not connect life with the army. The son of a friend is in Makarovka, but he also does not want to serve. What is it for.
            I heard a professional military pilots go to civilian life or to China, and their training is $ million / person ..
            PS: Although I agree, the army should be a contract, professional one. The annual appeal is laughter.
            1. Imperial Technocrat
              Imperial Technocrat 10 September 2020 14: 39 New
              +1
              We have mainly a contract, professional army. Units of constant combat readiness in general are all completely contractual, as well as operations abroad. But it is not necessary to completely cancel the call, the call is correct. Russians are a warrior nation
          2. Wwk7260
            Wwk7260 9 September 2020 17: 39 New
            -7
            and to call at 18, is there such a need? before the Second World War, they were called up in 20-22 g on average, and at this age it is a big difference! Why is the officer holding on to the 18-year-old call? for example, UA, when the war in Donbass began, and real fighters were required, they immediately raised the draft age to 20. Most of the officers in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, and any other army in the world, consider it as a feeding trough, and the structure of their life, and when fried the rooster bites, only then are they seriously engaged in its effectiveness
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 9 September 2020 18: 50 New
              +3
              Quote: Wwk7260
              and to call at 18, is there such a need? before the Second World War, they were called up in 20-22 g on average, and at this age it is a big difference!

              You can call at 20. Just what should a school graduate do these two years? Which of the normal firms will hire a person who needs to be fired 100% in two years?
          3. aleksejkabanets
            aleksejkabanets 9 September 2020 17: 58 New
            17
            Quote: Zhan
            The army should serve people trained, literate, and most importantly by vocation.

            If this is the people's army, then the soldiers must serve on conscription, and not a year. And school (vocational school, technical school) education must meet modern challenges. CWP should be games like "Zarnitsa" the same. But since the Russian Federation is a capitalist state, only a mercenary army is available to it. Mercenary armies always fight worse than popular ones, Vietnam is a vivid example of this. God forbid, there is now a war like the Second World War. We will have many Vlasov generals and few Aleksandrov Matrosov and Molodogvardeytsev.
            1. Lara Croft
              Lara Croft 9 September 2020 21: 32 New
              0
              Quote: aleksejkabanets
              Mercenary armies always fight worse than popular ones, Vietnam is a prime example of this.

              What nonsense ... if only I knew from what year the US Armed Forces began to recruit for hire, ... and not by conscription ...
              1. aleksejkabanets
                aleksejkabanets 9 September 2020 21: 56 New
                10
                Quote: Lara Croft
                What nonsense ... if only I knew from what year the US Armed Forces began to recruit for hire, ... and not by conscription ...

                Since the late sixties of the last century, the United States began a gradual transition to a contract army. By that time they had not had a general military appeal for a long time. Read about the draft lottery.
                1. Lara Croft
                  Lara Croft 9 September 2020 22: 12 New
                  0
                  Quote: aleksejkabanets
                  By that time they had not had a general military appeal for a long time.

                  What are you saying?
                  In 1957-1965, during the break between the Korean War and the Vietnam War, The Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps fully satisfied their needs at the expense of contract soldiers and only ground forces resorted to the call... Even at the height of the Vietnam War, in 1970-1971, as can be seen from Table 4, more than two-thirds of the American armed forces were replenished by contract soldiers.
                  there was a constantly growing number of conscripts in the United States for demographic reasons that the army simply could not absorb... To the President Nixon had to introduce a lottery draft system in December 1969 and only among potential conscripts of 19 years of age.

                  http://www.snowforum.ru/forums/?board=politics&action=view&id=558462&ts=20060127082848
                  Mercenary armies always fight worse than popular ones,

                  The example of the war "At World's End" suggests otherwise ...
                  1. aleksejkabanets
                    aleksejkabanets 9 September 2020 22: 31 New
                    11
                    Quote: Lara Croft
                    http://www.snowforum.ru/forums/?board=politics&action=view&id=558462&ts=20060127082848

                    You at least read your quote carefully, but it is clear from it that the bulk of the US Army was made up of contract soldiers. Where did you see that they had compulsory military service?
                    Quote: Lara Croft
                    The example of the war "At World's End" suggests otherwise ...

                    Please explain your idea. As for me, this is an extremely unfortunate example.
                    1. Lara Croft
                      Lara Croft 10 September 2020 07: 10 New
                      0
                      Quote: aleksejkabanets
                      You at least read your quote carefully, but it is clear from it that the bulk of the US Army was made up of contract soldiers. Where did you see that they had compulsory military service?

                      The quote refutes your speculation that
                      By that time they had not had a general military appeal for a long time.
                      and in my links it is indicated and underlined in black (specially) for you
                      In 1957-1965, during the break between the Korean War and the Vietnam War, The Air Force, the Navy and the Marine Corps fully satisfied their needs at the expense of contract soldiers, and only ground forces resorted to conscription.

                      Please explain your idea. As for me, this is an extremely unfortunate example.

                      Again, not clear? Why are you so dull .... and why a bad example?
                      In the war for the Falkland Islands against the Armed Forces of Argentina (where there was a general conscription), Great Britain fought (where the Armed Forces have been recruited since the 16th century, with the exception of two periods of world wars), the British Expeditionary Force was three times inferior to the forces of Argentina defending the archipelago ... ., in addition, the British had to operate from their shores for 12 nautical miles, which put the latter in a more disadvantageous position ...

                      I am not an adherent of a mercenary army, the example of the IDF and two Chechen companies, as well as the 08.08.08 war, showed that conscripts can fight no worse than contract soldiers, it all depends on the mentality of the nation ..... Russia is a constantly belligerent state and whoever is staffed RF Armed Forces, they will defeat the Empireists ...

                      I am for mixed manning of the RF Armed Forces, to return to what it was before 1939 (selective conscription), with an increase in the service life to 2 years ...
            2. Imperial Technocrat
              Imperial Technocrat 10 September 2020 14: 41 New
              +1
              You don't know anything about Russia at all, let alone its army. About love, devotion, reverence and duty to the Motherland, in the PM and in the contract army. This is confirmed by many modern examples. Fortunately, people like you are dying out, and you are getting smaller and smaller. Society is becoming healthier
              1. aleksejkabanets
                aleksejkabanets 10 September 2020 15: 19 New
                14
                Quote: Imperial Technocrat
                You don't know anything about Russia at all, let alone its army. About love, devotion, reverence and duty to the Motherland, in the PM and in the contract army. This is confirmed by many modern examples. Fortunately, people like you are dying out, and you are getting smaller and smaller. Society is becoming healthier

                What is this stream of consciousness? How are you with your health? Are you sure the society is getting healthier? How do you know what I know or don't know?
          4. Imperial Technocrat
            Imperial Technocrat 10 September 2020 14: 37 New
            +1
            Wwk is a loxol from ycpa. Genetic losers with 404s once again in history are in the spotlight, and all that remains for a rabbit is to try to crow at an elephant
        5. NEXUS
          NEXUS 9 September 2020 17: 28 New
          +3
          Quote: Wwk7260
          conventional RF, it sucks # analogGovnets #, every year it reduces the call,

          It is stupid and wasteful to call in millions of young men in peacetime, thereby maintaining a two-three millionth army in peacetime. And you know that. However, sit here and bend your fingers.
          What about your vixen
          Quote: Wwk7260
          Most of the contract soldiers are muddy lumpenized personalities, drunkenness, a disgusting attitude towards military equipment, and other phenomena flourish there!

          You traveled in parts and documented everything? And for me you are just throwing at the fan, Schaub it was not idle.
          The RF Armed Forces have 20 contract soldiers for 405 years, plus reservists. Moreover, in the event of a conventional war (hypothetical), most of the country's population, including women and children, will go under arms. It has always been so. And what is the mobilization potential of the European wing of NATO. tell me?
          1. Imperial Technocrat
            Imperial Technocrat 10 September 2020 14: 43 New
            0
            In the event of a major war, even a non-nuclear one, Russia will use tactical nuclear weapons not because it cannot win in a conventional one (as long as it can), but to save resources and, most importantly, human capital
      2. Aag
        Aag 9 September 2020 20: 01 New
        +1
        Quote: Imperial Technocrat
        Why only at strategic nuclear forces? Our conventional army is very strong, and tactical nuclear weapons are at an outstanding level.

        I understand that my opinion is subjective (RVSNovets), but nevertheless ...
        Remember, when ma'am appeared, "Lower (Upper) Volta with missiles, a lot of corresponding jokes? That's right, in EBNovskie times. I do not beg the work of colleagues from other types and genera of the Armed Forces, in some moments it was much harder for them. But, in fact, the only argument, despite all-combat-ready (a separate topic of the price of this very combat readiness) ICBMs of the Strategic Missile Forces! May naval and air strategists not be offended! It is not their fault that some were chained to the walls, others to the airfields ...
        So much for the stability of the strategic nuclear forces! hi drinks
        1. Imperial Technocrat
          Imperial Technocrat 10 September 2020 14: 46 New
          0
          SNF is not the only argument, other species and genus are also extremely strong and combat-ready. But as for the strategic nuclear forces, the point is that if we did not have strategic nuclear forces, but the United States did, the Americans would immediately launch a massive nuclear strike on Russia. Moreover, not only in military installations, but also in peaceful cities. Their leadership is under the complete control of Satanists, and they will not just not feel sorry for millions of peaceful people, but to kill a huge number will even be an extremely desirable, preferable option.

          But if the USA / NATO did not have strategic nuclear forces, the importance of our strategic nuclear forces would plummet.
  2. Vladislav Demchenko
    Vladislav Demchenko 9 September 2020 15: 17 New
    -1
    That is, all four regiments with Yars?
    Is there Yars-S in the division?
    1. KVU-NSVD
      KVU-NSVD 9 September 2020 15: 44 New
      0
      Quote: Vladislav Demchenko
      That is, all four regiments with Yars?
      Is there Yars-S in the division?

      And you go to the checkpoint and ask. Surely they will answer, the only question is - in a rude form or politely.
      1. Aag
        Aag 9 September 2020 16: 32 New
        +5
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        Quote: Vladislav Demchenko
        That is, all four regiments with Yars?
        Is there Yars-S in the division?

        And you go to the checkpoint and ask. Surely they will answer, the only question is - in a rude form or politely.

        Why? Search for 345 (home) missile regiment.
        On the weekend I went to pick mushrooms, birches grow on the parade ground, something has already pinched ...
        But there was some movement at the checkpoint today, the speakers were set up, the drones were launched ...
        I congratulate all those involved on the occasion! drinks
        1. KVU-NSVD
          KVU-NSVD 9 September 2020 16: 38 New
          -1
          Quote: AAG
          Why? Search for 345 (native) missile regiment

          or like this laughing the Internet is definitely more polite than the person on duty at the checkpoint. I myself had to stand repeatedly .. What potential patients I didn’t see ... I didn’t always have enough nerves .. True, the bars saved them from massacre, and me from a showdown with the authorities and the military prosecutor’s office .. One even tried from the trauma, but after the turn from the AKSU cool into the air .. and dumped ..
          1. Aag
            Aag 9 September 2020 20: 12 New
            0
            Quote: KVU-NSVD
            Quote: AAG
            Why? Search for 345 (native) missile regiment

            or like this laughing the Internet is definitely more polite than the person on duty at the checkpoint. I myself had to stand repeatedly .. What potential patients I didn’t see ... I didn’t always have enough nerves .. True, the bars saved them from massacre, and me from a showdown with the authorities and the military prosecutor’s office .. One even tried from the trauma, but after the turn from the AKSU cool into the air .. and dumped ..

            This happened quite often, especially when the status of the town was not determined: military, closed, not closed. And the gangster years, 90s ... There was a period when the watch at the checkpoint of the town from our regiment (wild, Chita) rarely ended without shooting .Sometimes, on both sides ...
    2. Imperial Technocrat
      Imperial Technocrat 10 September 2020 14: 48 New
      +1
      Of course there are, YARS is complete. There are almost no ordinary Topoloi left, and soon everything will be replaced with YARS, Sarmatians, Vanguards, Bulava and Kh-102
  3. Trapp1st
    Trapp1st 9 September 2020 15: 29 New
    +7
    Good news, you give big and good Yars!
  4. g1v2
    g1v2 9 September 2020 15: 36 New
    +6
    So Poplars are being changed to Yars. If this year they began to change Barnaul, then next year they will probably start Vypolzovo. Old Poplars are only there. I wonder if Poplar will be replaced after that or not? In principle, they are not yet old.
    1. Aag
      Aag 9 September 2020 21: 29 New
      +1
      Quote: g1v2
      So Poplars are being changed to Yars. If this year they began to change Barnaul, then next year they will probably start Vypolzovo. Old Poplars are only there. I wonder if Poplar will be replaced after that or not? In principle, they are not yet old.

      In stock since the end of 99th. Neither the "point" nor the "M" was felt on myself. I took your commentary-question with a delay. (?). I think what news, "Poplar" yes, I don't watch.
      What, good luck guys, smaller NBG, and emergency situations !!!
  5. Lelik76
    Lelik76 9 September 2020 15: 42 New
    +2
    Now my city can sleep peacefully. Although when they start all sorts of redeployment create a pancake terrible traffic jams on one of the entrances to the city. But for the sake of such good, I think you can suffer inconvenience.
    1. seregin-s1
      seregin-s1 9 September 2020 15: 59 New
      +5
      Your city will sleep well when the S-500 is deployed there. Until then, your city is a potential target.)
    2. Aag
      Aag 9 September 2020 20: 27 New
      0
      Quote: Lelik76
      Now my city can sleep peacefully. Although when they start all sorts of redeployment create a pancake terrible traffic jams on one of the entrances to the city. But for the sake of such good, I think you can suffer inconvenience.

      Thank you for your understanding, fellow countryman! Go around the Aleksandrovsky tract, although they are based there too ...
      Our city can sleep peacefully. In blind ignorance. You have already been answered, I commented afterwards, I don’t see where it went ...
      1. Aag
        Aag 9 September 2020 20: 58 New
        0
        I repeat ... Nowhere, I have never found an answer who, by what forces and means, is covering the area of ​​the 29th Rd for air defense, missile defense. I hope that something has changed. But on my working card there was a blue arrow ... in short, about an air raid I had to find out from the operational duty officer of the division, the one from the operational (no longer funny) duty officer at the Belaya airfield (this is a little later than the times when the chief of staff there was p-k Dudaev) via long-distance telephony (!) (TA- 57) ... Expand non-standard air defense crews with "Arrows" (where these "Arrows" were kept, I can only guess. During the entire service I held them twice in my hands, once I watched the launch of the simulator. (And I have, according to the plan, two calculations Air defense! From conscripts) Somehow it was ... repeat
  6. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 9 September 2020 16: 02 New
    +2
    There are 120 Yars.
    They are placed on 3 warheads. This means 360 CU.
    And you need to reach 450 warheads, approximately.
    Because, the Americans have 450 Minutemans, 1 warhead each. Approximately 100 warheads, that is, 30-40 Yars are still needed.
    And production for 20 per year.
    This means that the transition to Yarsy will be completed in a couple of years.
    If I am not mistaken in the approximate calculations.
    Nice rocket. This is the actual nuclear shield of Russia good
    1. Observer2014
      Observer2014 9 September 2020 16: 19 New
      -2
      Quote: voyaka uh
      There are 120 Yars.
      They are placed on 3 warheads. This means 360 CU.
      And you need to reach 450 warheads, approximately.
      Because, the Americans have 450 Minutemans, 1 warhead each. Approximately 100 warheads, that is, 30-40 Yars are still needed.
      And production for 20 per year.
      This means that the transition to Yarsy will be completed in a couple of years.
      If I am not mistaken in the approximate calculations.
      Nice rocket. This is the actual nuclear shield of Russia good

      Indeed, the rocket is awesome. It’s very eager to find out “Yars” as “Topol” will be able to lay down its three warheads at an average distance. “Topol” one can. From Kapustin Yar, two times were demonstratively fired at a training ground in Kazakhstan in 2014.
    2. Aag
      Aag 9 September 2020 16: 38 New
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      There are 120 Yars.
      They are placed on 3 warheads. This means 360 CU.
      And you need to reach 450 warheads, approximately.
      Because, the Americans have 450 Minutemans, 1 warhead each. Approximately 100 warheads, that is, 30-40 Yars are still needed.
      And production for 20 per year.
      This means that the transition to Yarsy will be completed in a couple of years.
      If I am not mistaken in the approximate calculations.
      Nice rocket. This is the actual nuclear shield of Russia good

      I remembered the cartoon "Thumbelina" ... "365 days, half a grain" ... lol
    3. mvg
      mvg 9 September 2020 17: 17 New
      +2
      And you need to reach 450 warheads, approximately

      We do not consider Satan to the governor? 30 Governors of 10 heads, as if there are already 300. And Satan will be changed 1 to 1. Although they cheat, which costs 6 BG each.
      Where is the confidence about one head on the Minutemans? They have another 400 in warehouses. And the total figure was drawn at 7-8 thousand, together with Trident.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 9 September 2020 17: 32 New
        -3
        There is an agreement on the number of deployed warheads on ICBMs. The Minutemans once had three, then they were reduced so as not to go beyond the scope of the agreement.
        Warheads have long been dismantled on Voivods. If the Sarmatians are put into service, but there will be fewer Yars. Or there will be fewer warheads on Yars.
        1. mvg
          mvg 9 September 2020 17: 47 New
          +3
          Warheads have long been dismantled on Voivods

          Status - on alert. At least on Wiki. And it makes sense to remove it if the service life was extended first to 30 years, then by another 10. Moreover, the extremely high level of successful launches. 0,93. The point is to change to a less powerful rocket. And the most powerful silos.
          Dnipro, after all, is like a conversion.
      2. Crash
        Crash 9 September 2020 18: 15 New
        +1
        We do not consider Satan to the governor?

        It is the same
        According to the western designation system, the rocket has the following names:
        - complex 15P018M "Voevoda" with missile R-36M2 / 15A18M / RS-20V with monoblock warhead 15F175 - SS-18 mod.5 SATAN
        - complex 15P018M "Voevoda" with missile R-36M2 / 15A18M / RS-20V with multiple warhead 15F173 - SS-18 mod.6 SATAN

        30 Governor of 10 heads, as if there are already 300

        Since the late 1990s, the Voevoda ICBMs in the number of 58 launchers have been based in the following areas:

        - 13th missile division of the 31st missile army of the Strategic Missile Forces (Dombarovskiy, UAH "Yasny") - 30 ICBMs

        - 62nd missile division of the 33rd guards missile army of the Strategic Missile Forces (Uzhur-4, Solar UAH) - 28 ICBMs

        The R-36M2 "Voyevoda" ICBM is scheduled to be removed from service in 2022. https://dfnc.ru/katalog-vooruzhenij/mezhkontinentalnye-ballisticheskie-rakety/r-36m2-voevoda/
        1. mvg
          mvg 9 September 2020 18: 31 New
          +2
          We do not consider Satan to the governor?

          It is the same

          Sarmat.
          Somewhere infa ran about 30 ICBMs in the ranks. I read about 58, but this is a very old article. Since 1998, like, according to Vicki. And in total, about 100 R-36M2s were produced, where 40-70 pieces were written off. Less trials.
    4. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 9 September 2020 18: 09 New
      +4
      There are poplars and maces and x101, the Sarmatians are preparing, plus each missile has a lot of false targets, turning 120 yars into more than 1200 on radars, so FShe and her puppet pseudo-states will have enough, but of course you cannot stop there ...
  7. viktor.
    viktor. 9 September 2020 16: 07 New
    +3
    Quote: Wwk7260
    conventional RF, complete sucks of # analogueGovnets #, every year the conscription is reduced, contract servicemen are mostly muddy lumpenized personalities, drunkenness is flourishing there, a disgusting attitude towards military equipment, and other phenomena! what ... put on contractors? contemplated on the USA? but there is a completely different story, and there are good contractors, but we have EVIL!

    What did you eat? belay fool
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 9 September 2020 16: 33 New
      +1
      Quote: viktor.
      What did you eat?

      Salo to Ukraine.
  8. rocket757
    rocket757 9 September 2020 17: 43 New
    +1
    You can call rakita "Rage", Schaub was clear at once what, why and why!
    And so, it is clear that the replacement is underway, this is a natural process.
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 9 September 2020 18: 20 New
      0
      Quote: rocket757
      You can call rakita "Rage"

      RakIta is also called IVA wink
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 9 September 2020 18: 31 New
        0
        Willow is not intErsno, and strange birds live on it, they are called Naivnyak.
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon 9 September 2020 20: 17 New
          0
          Quote: rocket757
          Iva is not intErEsno

          You yourself asked about "rakita". A question the answer. request
  9. Lara Croft
    Lara Croft 9 September 2020 21: 23 New
    0
    This unit is fully re-equipped with the Yars mobile missile system
    и
    In May, the head of the combat training department of the Strategic Missile Forces, Viktor Fotyuk, said that by the end of the year, two regiments of the Barnaul division of the Strategic Missile Forces would also be rearmed with the Yars complexes.

    As part of the Barnaul compound of the 2nd ICBM regiment? And apparently 10 PU in each ...
  10. Zomanus
    Zomanus 10 September 2020 00: 07 New
    0
    Norm. In general, thanks to the strategic nuclear forces, we do not know war.
    Otherwise, there would still be world wars one after another ...
  11. wow
    wow 10 September 2020 19: 41 New
    0
    Congratulations to the missilemen on the commissioning of the latest technology!