"Roskomnadzor": YouTube censored the film "Beslan" by Alexander Rogatkin

Roskomnadzor sent a request to the American company Google LLC to remove the restriction on the YouTube channel showing the documentary Beslan in the Russian Federation. The department draws attention to the fact that Russian legislation prohibits censorship, therefore they urge the company not to violate the laws of our country.

The agency reports RIA News.

When you open a video on the Internet, a warning appears on the screen that YouTube users consider the submitted content to be inappropriate. The channel also does not recommend watching the film for people with an unstable psyche and children. In this case, the viewer can still turn on the video by clicking the "confirm and want to continue" button before that.

The investigation film "Beslan" was created by the TV channel "Russia 1". Its director is Alexander Rogatkin. He said that the restrictions affected only the Russia 1 YouTube channel. On Rogatkin's personal channel, where he also posted the film, there are no warnings or restrictions.

The premiere screening of the documentary "Beslan" took place on September 3 on the TV channel "Russia 1". The filming was attended by witnesses of the tragic events of September 1, 2004 and those people who were then held hostage by the militants.

Comments

[Fedor Sokolov]

A brutal war with the west and a humiliating peace with the east (Alexander Nevsky).

[Temples]

Have you personally been humiliated?
On the parade ground, in front of the line?

I think you have never been to those places at all.

Maybe you humiliated yourself?

[Aaron Zawi]

I saw this film on Russia-24. Compared to the horror that there was in real life a completely vegetarian film.

[Nosgoth]

Did they teach you to "poke" in the barn? If you don't like your opponent, then this is not a reason to turn into a boor yourself.

[Mountain shooter]

Is it time to make your "You Tube"? How else? They censor them, without any ...

[Sibguest]

Totally agree with you.
Its own, Russian analogue to which to prevent advertising from the West, liberals and other trash.

[orionvitt]

Quote: Sibguest

Is it time to make your "You Tube"?

Not technically difficult. Need stupidly finances and support of the notorious "world government". Which is not known to be. And the American fairy tale, about how two unfinished students founded an Internet company that controls a huge segment of the consumer Internet market.

[Sergey M. Karasev]

Yes, RuTube has been around for a long time, but there is nothing special to watch.

[Nosgoth]

RuTube is still a dump, he with such an approach will never become a competitor ... to anyone.

[Jack O'Neill]

Is it time to make your "You Tube"? How else? They censor them, without any ...

We tried already, Rutub was born, now it's just a trash heap. We will not be able to create the same media platform, even close.

[gorecc]

have already made their own search engine "satellite" .. laundered two lard rubles and recently closed, they say it did not take off

[Pereira]

Do not remember Rogozin in vain.

[Motorist]

Quote: Gorecc

have already made their own search engine "satellite" .. laundered two lard rubles and recently closed, they say it did not take off

I don’t know what about the search engine, but the Sputnik browser works perfectly - I’m using it right now.

[KCA]

Meaning? I'm really sure to type in Beslan Rogatkin in a search engine, then thousands of links will come out, the light has not converged on YouTube

[Piramidon]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

Is it time to make your "You Tube"? How else? They censor them, without any ...

Isn't this the Russian analogue of "You Tube"?
https://rutube.ru/
Only it is not promoted like You Tube. It takes time and popular content.

[Nosgoth]

RuTube is not only not promoted, it is even worse in terms of censorship than its foreign progenitor. In a word - a dump. YandexEther is the same cesspool, even our patriotic channels are not welcome there ... Commercial garbage can - analogue of "Dom2".

[evgen1221]

And where did they find censorship there ???

[Sentinel-vs]

I don’t know what the alarmist article is. There is a warning in YouTube that many users have complained about inadmissibility. This is usually done with all videos where there are scenes of cruelty and violence. In A. Rogatkin's film there are very frank footage of a dismembered woman, corpses, blood, etc. Incl. it is quite reasonable to warn before watching what particularly impressionable viewers can expect. It is possible that the format of the warning is not entirely correct, I agree here.

[Alexey from Perm]

They have their own censorship, we have our own, nobody pleases the truth and everyone has their own. the West doesn't like our point of view on events. Our "leaders" do not like the truth that shows them without embellishment, for example, the protests in Khabarovsk are not covered by any state media.

[ermak124.0]

Who is interested in your protests in Khabarovsk? For example, I don't care about them at all.

[Alexey from Perm]

they are kremlebots, they have no homeland, they only have an owner ..

[neri73-r]

Quote: Alexey from Perm

They have their own censorship, we have our own, nobody pleases the truth and everyone has their own. the West doesn't like our point of view on events. Our "leaders" do not like the truth that shows them without embellishment, for example, the protests in Khabarovsk are not covered by any state media.

You are lying, you have shown it on all channels.

[Alexey from Perm]

for what all?

[neri73-r]

On all central, moreover, not only on the news, but also discussed on the talk show!

[Alex Justice]

You are lying, you have shown it on all channels.

We were not shown. And the protests in Belarus were not covered either, but Putin's five minutes in every news.

[Pereira]

Whoever doesn't like Russian and Western censorship can always choose Chinese.

[ioan-e]

Quote: Alexey from Perm

They have their own censorship, we have our own, nobody pleases the truth and everyone has their own. the West doesn't like our point of view on events. Our "leaders" do not like the truth that shows them without embellishment, for example, the protests in Khabarovsk are not covered by any state media.

Get lost, paid!

[Alexey from Perm]

I wanted to tell you this

[PalBor]

What censorship we have. Vaughn Guzel Yakhina for "Zuleikha" will be awarded the government prize tomorrow. And from an artistic and historical point of view - a complete disgusting. However ... Soon, probably, Navalny will receive some order or state prize.

[Alexey from Perm]

YOU don’t understand, these films are needed only for one thing, to tarnish the memory of the USSR and the communists, to lie about what was not, and to multiply what was. This is so that no one thinks to change something in Russia. Our rulers have a very sweet life and they don’t want to change anything, THAT is the only purpose of such movie pomoys, They are created for this, the state turns a blind eye to their unprofitableness, all for the sake of one goal, socialism should not be repeated.

[PalBor]

Why don't I understand. Anti-Sovietism, moreover, ardent is present in many of our "works", from "Confrontations" to "Upward Movement," and only the policy of opposing pre-revolutionary and post-revolutionary Russia - state. politics. This is at a time when, on the contrary, it is necessary to promote the continuity and continuity of the country's history. The belittling of great statesmen, like Grozny or Stalin, is all to the mill of the "singers of savagery and backwardness" of Russia. Alas, the policy of the state or part of its representatives is aimed at weakening the state.

[Sergey M. Karasev]

Such warnings come out before most videos with shocking scenes. This is bullshit. Just an extra click.
Is the movie locked or cut? If not, then this is no censorship.

[Astra wild]

"People with an unstable psyche and children" in YouTube, there are many films that children should watch least of all. Does YouTube always warn about?

[Pechkin]

There is no censorship on the part of YouTube in this case, I calmly opened the film. And the warning that some users marked the video as inappropriate, this means that some users have filed a complaint. I can file such a complaint about the video about Pinocchio and daddy Carlo, for example. this will be done by a certain number of users, then such a warning will continue until YouTube understands this warning is made by an automatic bot.

[codetalker]

And so it affects that we have not worked in this direction properly for years. But you have to start sometime. And now to present something to YouTube - well, it's even somehow ridiculous. By the way, talk about the fact that: “We will never create such a platform” is complete nonsense. Take a look at RT.

[Elephant]

Yes, write out a fine for YouTube for violating Russian law, there is a similar practice! Or, in retaliation, block content that is hostile to us.

[Fibrizio]

And then what will the prohibitionists look at, killing time at meetings of the State Duma? You can close the entire site and not individual content.

And where did you see the censorship there? When YouTube videos contain all kinds of "meat" and "tin", YouTube warns you about this, and to watch or not is a master's business. Just poke the "show, show" button and that's it.

[Hog]

Quote: Elephant

Yes, write out a fine for YouTube for violating Russian law, there is a similar practice! Or, in retaliation, block content that is hostile to us.

Where is the violation?

[Fibrizio]

that Russian legislation prohibits censorship, therefore they urge the company not to violate the laws of our country.

But this is something new

[Piramidon]

The premiere screening of the documentary "Beslan" took place on September 3 on the TV channel "Russia 1".

Not a fig did not understand. Can it be shown on Central TV, but not on You Tube?

[Hog]

He said that the restrictions affected only the Russia 1 YouTube channel. On Rogatkin's personal channel, where he also posted the film, there are no warnings or restrictions.

Of course, he compared the Russia 1 channel with 3,82 million subscribers and the Alexander Rogatkin Studio channel with 9,51 thousand subscribers, of course they follow the major channels so that all their content would comply with the rules of the site (and there should be a warning and this is not censorship, but Rogatkin's desire to hyip), and Rogatkin's YouTube channel is not interesting.

[Pacifist]

Roskomnadzor should pay attention to the fact that Youtube has become obsolete and is engaged in direct political censorship. For example, it bans channels or removes videos with analysis of Nazi, liberal and other lies of pro-Western media and politicians, and at the same time does nothing about this lie itself, and with a video promoting Nazi ideology.