Military Review

Trump catches up with Biden. Is it time for the US to prepare for the "Maidan"?

83

The last days have brought unexpected news regarding the election campaign in the United States. The current owner of the White House, whom some hastened to write off from the account, a priori having declared a loser in the upcoming electoral battle, began to close the gap with his opponent. So the result of the vote is becoming more and more unpredictable. However, there is even more intrigue in the answer to the question: will the American society accept this result?


Recently, such an authoritative publication as USA Today published the data of a sociological survey, according to which, over the past three months, the gap between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, estimated at 12 percentage points, has decreased to 7 percentage points. carried out by SSRS at the request of CNN. If you believe them, today 50% of US citizens surveyed are ready to vote for Biden, while 46% of respondents are for Trump. That is, the gap here is only 4 pp!

It is worth remembering that during the previous elections, during which Hillary Clinton was a rival of Donald Trump, sociologists “painted” him a 7 percentage point loss, and he won. In the current situation, the position of the head of the White House is even, perhaps, better, if we consider the alignment of the states, among which even Michigan, which had hesitated earlier, began to lean on his side. Let's not forget: in the United States, the head of state is not elected by citizens by direct vote, but by the so-called electoral colleges. This brought Trump victory in 2016, and it seems to be playing into the hands now.

Local political experts, trying to find out the reasons for such a sharp change in electoral sympathies, are inclined to conclude that the feverish country for several months now, mass protests that have unfolded initially under anti-racist slogans and are so hotly supported, can most likely become a ticket to a second term opponents of Donald Trump - the US Democratic Party. The movement, which began as a vibrant street show, has gone too far in the opinion of many Americans, resulting in massive outbreaks of violence, pogroms, looting and acts of vandalism. People want order and peace, and they associate these concepts with the conservative Trump, and not with the liberal Biden.

The problem is that the extremely aggravated pre-election struggle, accompanied by the most acute mutual attacks of competitors, split the country. The data from the sociological polls mentioned above bear extremely disturbing tendencies: according to the authors of USA Today, about 20% of Trump's supporters and 28% of Biden's supporters are absolutely not ready to recognize the victory of an "alien" candidate as legitimate and honest. It must be said that the level of confidence in the results of the upcoming elections, perhaps, has never been so low in the United States as it is now.

What would be the result of this skepticism? This largely depends on whether the presidential contenders themselves agree with the announced voting results. And something suggests that both candidates are capable of presenting a hefty surprise here: their rhetoric has been too belligerent lately. Do not forget about the "street factor": the same fans of Biden and the Democrats, who took part in the protests, may well declare their rejection of the election result. And then the ex-vice-president will have a great temptation to ride this new protest wave, to lead and ride on its crest into the White House.

However, Trump's electorate, the very average white Americans, who already have the ugliness on the streets of their cities in their livers, have recently shown a hefty ability and desire to consolidate. They, too, are able to say their weighty word in the event that they are firmly convinced that the victory was stolen from them. The most dangerous thing for the United States in all this is the explosive stratum of both professional activists and fighters against them, formed in society during the racial protests. For both, any mess in the country will only play into the hands.

Many political experts believe that the upcoming debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden may put the final point in the election campaign. Perhaps, if only they will help those percentage points, which, according to sociologists, still fluctuate, to determine their electoral sympathies.

But one cannot discount the other option, in which both candidates, finding themselves face to face, will further escalate the tension of confrontation and urge their supporters to go to the barricades in case of their own defeat. Then the United States will not escape the "Maidan".
Author:
Photos used:
Wikipedia / Donald Trump
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. rocket757
    rocket757 7 September 2020 12: 11 New
    +2
    Entertaining events go black!
    In short, it will not be bored, ANYONE!
    It won't be easier for us, no matter who wins ... but if they get into a fight, specifically, there won't be much time, it's calmer than it was before.
    1. Temples
      Temples 7 September 2020 12: 21 New
      +1
      The black man invented the light bulb! tongue
      Hurray America! wassat

      Long live democracy! wassat
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 7 September 2020 12: 25 New
        +6
        Ha, ha, my dearest half is apolitical from the definition AT ALL !!!
        I noticed and calculated how many blacks are shown in imported ads, and how many are whites ... at least 10: 1 !!! complete imbalance!
        Politics, politics, but we must MEASURE TO KNOW !!!
        1. Vladimir61
          Vladimir61 7 September 2020 13: 14 New
          +1
          Quote: rocket757
          I noticed and calculated how many blacks are shown in import advertising, and how many are whites ... at least 1: 10 !!! complete imbalance!
          The ampers themselves have developed the technology of "color revolutions", so what color happens to them? African Americans, black, brown and other color tones, cannot be called. Whites too, it is offensive to call them white. They even want to cancel the rainbow. Here is an ambush!
          1. antivirus
            antivirus 7 September 2020 13: 37 New
            +2
            it will be worse - during the unrest, foreign trade will fall and China + the EU will be offended by a partner. where should the suppliers go now? + also in debt (bonds) are not quoted. bias in the world in favor of Africa and India
            1. Temples
              Temples 7 September 2020 16: 45 New
              +3
              Quote: Temples
              The black man invented the light bulb!

              Biden said that.
              Not me.
              The senile wants to become president.
              Or they want to make him president.

              It's only the beginning.

              The old man will soon discover the truth that Columbus was also a Negro. good
              1. U-Gin78
                U-Gin78 10 September 2020 09: 11 New
                0
                Well, the fact that the Lord God was a Negro, they have shown in the movies for a long time!
          2. Dizel200
            Dizel200 7 September 2020 19: 26 New
            +1
            I dare to suggest the color is brown with different shades laughing
        2. Mountain shooter
          Mountain shooter 7 September 2020 15: 49 New
          +3
          Quote: rocket757
          Politics, politics, but you need to know MEASURE !!!

          There is no measure there. 11% of the population (blacks) put the whole country on the ears. The election results will not be recognized as a loser on either side. But if the Democrats lose, the outrage on the streets will intensify! And if they win, the humiliated white MOST with weapons in their hands will begin to defend their rights. Not everyone agrees to kiss black shoes!
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 7 September 2020 16: 33 New
            0
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            There is no measure there

            That is, the mess has already been paid for !!! It remains to issue him to the mountain?
      2. Nikolay Ivanov_5
        Nikolay Ivanov_5 7 September 2020 12: 59 New
        0
        If Gene Sharp, the ideologue of the “color revolutions,” had been alive, he would have been very happy with what was happening on the streets in the United States.
    2. figwam
      figwam 7 September 2020 12: 40 New
      +1
      They will increase the intensity of confrontation even more and call on their supporters to go to the barricades in case of their own loss. Then the United States will not escape the "Maidan".

      Burn burn clearly that would not go out.
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather 7 September 2020 12: 57 New
        +4
        Trump catches up with Biden. Is it time for the US to prepare for the "Maidan"?
        hell ... radish ... mustard ... biden ... trump ... don't care, it's the same, we are enemies by definition. all.
        1. Nikolay Ivanov_5
          Nikolay Ivanov_5 7 September 2020 15: 54 New
          0
          But Biden is an obvious enemy who is also sick with senile insanity.
    3. AllBiBek
      AllBiBek 7 September 2020 19: 25 New
      +1
      Well, it really doesn't matter?
      Biden is a teetotal Yeltsin, and it would be nice for them to ALSO learn the whole nation what a worthless senile at the helm of the Empire is.
      Although, of course, Trump is more appealing to me purely in terms of human qualities, like most of the people in the Russian Federation. Under him, at least, the States did not start a single new war, for them this is already progress.
      If 4 more years do not start a single one, they will break their record of the second half of the last century.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Daniil Konovalenko
    Daniil Konovalenko 7 September 2020 12: 18 New
    +1
    Many political experts believe that the upcoming debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden may put the final point in the election campaign.
    .... Yes, what a debate laughing VVP with hackers will intervene once again ... and that's it. laughing
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 7 September 2020 12: 29 New
      +2
      Quote: Daniil Konovalenko
      What a debate

      If the debate starts PERFECT !!! then it won't even look like beating a baby! for objective reasons, by the way.
      1. Daniil Konovalenko
        Daniil Konovalenko 7 September 2020 12: 36 New
        +2
        They will definitely have a debate ... And so who wins in their race, somehow on a drum ... As time has shown, Trump, Biden is not sweeter ... Trump wins, the relationship will not get better. Biden wins, relations get worse ...
    2. Prisoner
      Prisoner 7 September 2020 12: 36 New
      +5
      Biden would have seen this debate. I think it will be an extravaganza. laughing
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 7 September 2020 13: 07 New
        +2
        As far as I understand, they insist from Trump that there should be a medical check-up (they didn’t have any stimulants), then, eye to eye, there were NO prompters !!! it's not even an extravaganza, I don't know how to describe it.
      2. figwam
        figwam 7 September 2020 13: 07 New
        +2
        Quote: Captive
        Biden would have seen this debate. I think this will be an extravaganza

        Parkinson's knocking there.
      3. Lontus
        Lontus 8 September 2020 10: 45 New
        +3
        Quote: Captive
        Biden would have seen this debate. I think it will be an extravaganza. laughing

        Unfortunately, we will be deprived of this joy.
        The Democrats are firmly determined to prevent the demonstration of the degree of Biden's insanity - which will be obvious in the debate ..
  4. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 7 September 2020 12: 19 New
    0
    It is far from the thought that people who have looked at the pogroms caused by the murder of black police officers, and having felt the consequences of the riots on their own skin, will rush to the barricades at the call.
    It seems to me that Kharaluzhny is simply trying to voice his dreams.
  5. leks
    leks 7 September 2020 12: 19 New
    +8
    It should be borne in mind that the electoral system in the United States is different from ours. What the poll shows in the United States does not mean anything, an example of the past elections, everything will be decided by the electoral college from each state.
    As for the candidates, it is better to let the Republican Trump be than the old senile Biden from the Democrats.
    1. Ragnar Lodbrok
      Ragnar Lodbrok 7 September 2020 12: 39 New
      +9
      Although it is said that horseradish radish is not sweeter, but there is one more adage, of two evils choose the lesser. I agree, let there be Trump, otherwise the Democrats, starting with Hillary, are all inadequate to the government, we eat more with them than with the Republicans ...
  6. fn34440
    fn34440 7 September 2020 12: 21 New
    +6
    And why are we "Novichok" CONSTANTLY under-poisoning every liberal prank in Russia? It's time to under-poison someone in the enemy's lair. And to blame "sleeping Joe", Pelossi's grandmother, chocolate Michelle ibn Hussein Obama, horned Hillary for this ...
  7. Doccor18
    Doccor18 7 September 2020 12: 22 New
    +4
    ... which someone has already rushed to write off from the account, a priori declaring him a loser ..

    Well, well ... And Biden is straight "a mighty knight in golden armor" ... It looks like the electorate is tired of the elders. And Trump is still full of strength and charisma. The air will still shake ...
    1. Daniil Konovalenko
      Daniil Konovalenko 7 September 2020 12: 43 New
      -3
      Well, well ... And Biden is straight "a mighty knight in golden armor" ... It looks like the electorate is tired of the elders.
      .... And this, by the way, is also a minus for Democrats ... Covid, as you know, is especially dangerous for the elderly ...
      1. AllBiBek
        AllBiBek 7 September 2020 19: 30 New
        +4
        Biden is a ticket to power for a young and aggressive shobla, openly supportive of six-color ideology, which has long been more than a crowd of people prone to sexual deviations. Here you have gender quotas, militant feminism 4 waves, and other horsemen of the apocalypse.
        And this crap is still gaining strength. This is posthumanism, which they will call a term such as "progressivism", and - alas - this is the second time - after hippies - when the States set fashion with a young planet-scale engine.
        We'll pay more.
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 7 September 2020 13: 09 New
      +3
      Quote: Doccor18
      And Trump is still full of strength and charisma.

      Unlike almost all US presidents, Trump has not yet unleashed a war anywhere, but on the contrary, he is even folding bases.
      1. Kamarada
        Kamarada 7 September 2020 13: 30 New
        +3
        The forces are gone ..!
      2. AllBiBek
        AllBiBek 7 September 2020 19: 32 New
        +1
        Uh-huh, and somehow became frequent with military exercises near our borders, even a nuclear strike of hundreds of tags on the Crimea worked out. Although it wasn't him, he had no choice. The military have their own engines there.
  8. Pavel57
    Pavel57 7 September 2020 12: 36 New
    +2
    Quote: leks
    everything will be decided by an electoral college from each state.

    And if the collegiums do not agree?
    1. leks
      leks 7 September 2020 12: 43 New
      +1
      Are there precedents?
    2. Rokambol
      Rokambol 7 September 2020 12: 49 New
      +6
      Quote: Pavel57
      And if the collegiums do not agree?

      They have not yet had this ... Although everything can be for the first time ... If they do not agree, it will be enchanting)))
      1. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 9 September 2020 21: 25 New
        0
        Why wasn't there? In 1800 and 1824. failed to elect the President of the United States to the electoral college, so Thomas Jefferson and John Quincy Adams were elected presidents by a vote in the House of Representatives. Moreover, Adams was in second place during the voting in the college and was inferior to Jackson. But the lower house chose Adams.
    3. Avior
      Avior 8 September 2020 19: 05 New
      0
      There's nothing to negotiate about
      Traditionally, all electoral votes from the state go to the candidate with the majority of the popular vote.
      Formally, this is not necessary, and there were very rare cases when a particular elector voted differently for certain reasons, but there was never a case that this changed the result as a whole.
      1. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 9 September 2020 21: 21 New
        0
        In two or three states, I don't remember exactly, the division of seats in the House of Electors between representatives of different parties is allowed. But these states don't make the weather.
        1. Avior
          Avior 9 September 2020 22: 20 New
          0
          In 2 states. Maine and Nebraska, there is a special system of electoral selection and limited different voting is possible. 4 electors in one and 5 in the other. There 2 and 3 electors are elected in the constituencies.
          In other states, 2 electoral lists are prepared from parties and the governor approves the list from the party, whose representative won the majority in the state.
    4. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 9 September 2020 21: 13 New
      0
      The votes of all collegiums are summed up. Moreover, in the vast majority of states, all members of the collegium represent one party. Relatively speaking, there are 12 people in the collegium of some staff. This is if the state is of medium size, 2 senators are elected from it (their number is the same from all states) and 10 members of the House of Representatives (their number depends on the population of the state). If in this state 51, 1% are Republicans, and 49,9 are Democrats, then all 12 members of the college will be from the Republicans. That is, the votes of almost half of those who voted will disappear. That is, the American system of presidential elections is very peculiar. Therefore, they have repeatedly won one candidate in terms of the number of votes, and another won in the collegium and became president. Thus, more voters voted for Hillary Clinton than for Trump. If no candidate wins the majority of the votes of the members of the electoral college, then the elections are postponed to Congress. The President will be elected by the House of Representatives and the Vice President by the Senate from among the candidates with the most votes in the electoral college. This happened once in the history of the United States, in the 19th century. By the way, they have a precedent when a person who did not participate in the presidential elections became president. During the second presidency of Nixon, Vice President Spiro Agnew (by the way, with Greek roots) resigned, suspected of various machinations. Ford was confirmed as vice-president at the suggestion of President Nixon. Soon, Nixon himself, without waiting for impeachment, voluntarily resigned. And Ford automatically became president.
      1. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 9 September 2020 21: 27 New
        0
        More precisely, twice, in 1800 and 1824. See my comment above.
  9. Kuroneko
    Kuroneko 7 September 2020 13: 00 New
    0
    But one cannot discount the other option, in which both candidates, finding themselves face to face, will further escalate the tension of confrontation and urge their supporters to go to the barricades in case of their own defeat. Then the United States will not escape the "Maidan".

    Well, let them themselves try to swallow for the sake of diversity what they feed others.
  10. Pavel57
    Pavel57 7 September 2020 13: 16 New
    +1
    Quote: leks
    Are there precedents?

    Once we were on the brink, but we agreed. And now a much bigger jackpot is at stake. Therefore, anything is possible.
    1. leks
      leks 7 September 2020 14: 09 New
      +1
      Well, what is there, maybe "kush" except as the main chair in the White House. Or do you think after these elections the future president will have powers like the tsar?
      They have there, every election, so it is.
      Nothing in the United States with the electoral system and the presidency will change from November 2020.
    2. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 9 September 2020 21: 30 New
      0
      See my comment above. Twice in US history, in 1800 and 1824, after unsuccessful elections to the electoral college, the President was elected by the House of Representatives
  11. Sergey Obraztsov
    Sergey Obraztsov 7 September 2020 13: 23 New
    0
    Wait and see. But Mom told me many times - Don't do evil to people, it will definitely come back to you ...
  12. Pavel57
    Pavel57 7 September 2020 13: 51 New
    +1
    Quote: Sergey Obraztsov
    Do not do evil to people, it will definitely come back to you ...


    Good conquers evil, whoever conquers is good.
  13. frizzy
    frizzy 7 September 2020 14: 15 New
    +2
    As the WFP decides so it will be. I am for Trump-I like him, he is a "real colonel"
  14. BAI
    BAI 7 September 2020 14: 30 New
    +2
    So the voting result is becoming more and more unpredictable.

    And here the result is known several years before the vote.
  15. Wwk7260
    Wwk7260 7 September 2020 14: 42 New
    0
    The author repulsed the topic #vsemirmaidansoon # from Viktor Kamenev along the way, something has not been seen on VO for a long time.
  16. prior
    prior 7 September 2020 17: 14 New
    0
    "Is it time for the US to prepare for the "Maidan"?"

    Give me a black maidan!
    1. AllBiBek
      AllBiBek 7 September 2020 19: 35 New
      0
      It will be six-color, and - yes, they are already preparing for it. According to the classics.
      They urge, for example, not to knowingly recognize the results if Trump wins. And through the media - and most of the Democrats - pour into the ears of the Yankees the idea that "Trump must go" without explaining why. Hinting that this will make everyone feel better at once. Doesn't it look like anything?
      The states have robbed the whole world, it is now easier for them to rob inside themselves on the usual scale than abroad. At least it's safer that way.
      1. Kushka
        Kushka 7 September 2020 22: 16 New
        +1
        It seems to me that with the "Maidan" you went too far a priori. it
        from a completely different category of "sports", such as:
        putsch, coup, junta. And in the USA, France, Germany
        the same elections (see. People are able to live).
        1. AllBiBek
          AllBiBek 7 September 2020 22: 46 New
          +1
          Their election is a competition, who will push through, and ours - who will push through. Do you understand the difference?
          1. Kushka
            Kushka 7 September 2020 23: 04 New
            -1
            You are right, who will drag his own. Those. the candidate must
            understand - without a party, he is an empty place. Moreover, at
            BOTH parties are initially two or three candidates, i.e. already
            competition, for the fun of the voter. Further remain
            one at a time and - in the main battle (main entertainment).
            For 100 years now, in the first part, everything is the same - without a party
            even seven inches in the forehead - you are nobody. But in the second part:
            (in stages): from the bloc of communists and non-party names
            and here is the secretary general for you (for life).
            From the EBN party, here's your GDP and here's your president.
            From the VVP party, here's Dimon for you and here's the president for you
            From Dimona's party, here's the GDP and here's the president for you.
            From the president of the GDP, here is the GDP for you and here is the president for you
            (for life?)
            Do you understand the difference?
            1. AllBiBek
              AllBiBek 8 September 2020 00: 03 New
              +3
              Naturally.
              Our model is closer to the Chinese one, and it has been formed and refined for millennia. And with much more human material.
              Take the presidents of the United States for the entire past century, which of them are mere mortals? The offspring of the ruling elite as they are, hereditary billionaires.
              All our rulers over the past century are from the bottom. Not the most, but by the standards of the United States - lucky upstarts. With them, this is not realistic in principle, the elite from childhood learns among the elite, often in a barracks position, in conditions of harsh hazing, and there everyone is tied to everyone long before this or that party pushes them out of the leadership. And they represent there not the electorate, but their clans and groups. And their main concern is the interests of clans and groups, current ones, from elections and by-elections.
              With us - as luck would have it, but in general - they take care of the people to the best of their ability and talents.
              They do not forget themselves, of course, but - what would you have forgotten in their place?
              Russia did not succeed in copying the Western model, even in the accelerated mode of the 90s. Doesn't fit at all.
              It is logical that they undertook to plant a semblance of the Chinese, and the result is much better.
              We are a separate civilization, a Russian-speaking ecumene. With its own specifics, history, cultural paradigms, and more.
              West - they are different.
              The Germans kindled two World Wars, in which tens of millions of people were burned - and they are their own in it.
              The Russians liberated the West from their own tyrants twice - from Napoleon and Hitler, both times they were surprised that we were not the barbarians they were drawn to, and, moreover, in many moments it was much more cultured and more generous than they - but we are ours to them we did not and we will not become.
              And if so, then why should I blindly follow them?

              By the way, a question to fill in: they always have a fight between two political parties, but name the key moments for any couple, where they are radically different? Not in words, but in deeds.
              1. Revolver
                Revolver 8 September 2020 01: 49 New
                +1
                Quote: AllBiBek
                Take the presidents of the United States for the entire past century, which of them are mere mortals? The offspring of the ruling elite as they are, hereditary billionaires.

                Truman was born in Missouri, in the South, ravaged by the Civil War, in a small town. He did not receive a higher education. He made a career from the very bottom. When he retired from the post of president, all he had was an incomplete military pension (participant of the 1st World) $ 112.56 per month. He refused to work on the boards of directors of companies, because he did not want private companies to use his name and authority; considered it corruption. I fell into poverty and debt. It is because of this that Congress passed the Pension Act for retired presidents.
                Eisenhower - was born in Kansas (by the standards of the United States - a rural hinterland) in a large family, not poor, but by no means rich. Graduated from military school. He began his service as a lieutenant.
                Johnson - from a poor family, began his career as a school teacher, then as an assistant to the Congressman.
                Nixon was born into a poor family.
                Ford is kind of like a banker's paternal grandson, but his father left his mother shortly after his birth. The father did not pay child support. The grandfather paid regularly until he died. He had nothing to do with the automobile plant.
                Carter - yes, the hereditary owner of peanut plantations, far from poor, but up to the level of banking and industrial tycoons like you to China in a well-known position.
                Reagan is from a poor family.
                Bush - yes, he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, a hereditary multimillionaire, from almost the very top.
                Clinton is also from a very poor family, his father died early, grew up with his stepfather.
                1. Revival
                  Revival 8 September 2020 14: 43 New
                  0
                  Nicely wiped, I applaud.
                  I would also add that the apponent modestly cited our rulers "from the very bottom" as an example only for the 20th century (and why would it be))) and at the same time passed it off as our millennial feature, cleverly, of course, but too thick ..
              2. Kushka
                Kushka 8 September 2020 13: 21 New
                0
                Well, that's what I'm talking about! They always have a happy end in the movies,
                the elections are arranged in the same way - in any case "happy end".
                And the "key" moments they have only on TV debates - there
                stupid fights without rules - "I'll plant hillary", old, etc.
                Show....
                Is it the case with us - if the elections - "Get up, a huge country!"
                Get up on ... further yourself.
                I didn't quite understand you twice - "Russia didn't succeed
                copy (see above), "do not understand why we refused"
                (see below) - it seems to me that we have never tried such
                was not, not why, somehow.
  17. Kushka
    Kushka 7 September 2020 18: 23 New
    0
    People know how to live! Start two parties
    (Democrats / Republicans, Labor / Conservatives,
    CDU / SPD) and four years have the pleasure of watching
    how they sweep each other (while drinking almost half of the country,
    walk and do not bother with politics at all).
    In the end, whoever wins, neither for the first nor for the second,
    nothing changes, it is even better to become (both under Reagan and
    economic growth took place under Obama).
    Those. their voters are guaranteed well-being in any
    case. I suspect that in the case without a president, the same.
    Well, you understand what I mean.
    1. AllBiBek
      AllBiBek 7 September 2020 19: 41 New
      +1
      This is the Anglo-Saxon model, the hereditary elites do not give a damn about the common man in the street from the high tower, the attitude towards the lower classes there is not even bestial, it is worse. They have a significant percentage of the population - they live in cars, most of the rest - in a mortgage for half a century for cardboard houses with a beautiful facade, and a third of the nation is in fact on drugs prescribed "for medical reasons."
      Nothing personal, just business. "
      Every 12th is also imprisoned, and at the same time, prisons are also a profitable business.
      Well, a bunch of other moments of their model. And at the same time - food checks, humanitarian events (and for them tax breaks), and a bunch of other dubious goodies of the model. The type of freedom of religion (in fact, most of the country consists of Christian sects, plus a bunch of Catholics among the Latinos).
      This is normal for them, and they sincerely do not understand why we abandoned their path under their leadership in their direction.
      Self-conceit, cho.
      1. Kushka
        Kushka 7 September 2020 22: 05 New
        0
        I will not even argue - 20 years further from the suburbs of my settlement.
        have not been. I meant exactly the elections. After all, we always have this-
        apocalypse (see Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Armenia
        etc.) And there - "democratic process" (about "without a president"
        I bent - the cherry on the cake - when both the first and the second get tired of hitting
        each other, they at once begin to beat the president with everything that is at hand
        will get the most buzz for the voter) But the "fate of the country" voters
        they do not decide, you are right. Show...
  18. Old partisan
    Old partisan 7 September 2020 19: 29 New
    -1
    We Russians, in principle, don't give a damn about who will win there. This is their country and their president.
  19. Imperial Technocrat
    Imperial Technocrat 7 September 2020 20: 35 New
    0
    In the United States of America (for now), civil war and disintegration will begin in November. It is now approximately March 1945. After the collapse of the United States and the victory in the 4th world / hybrid / war, Putin will finally climb one step with Stalin
  20. Revolver
    Revolver 7 September 2020 23: 48 New
    -1
    Maidan? recourse No. fool negative After all, we don't have a US embassy here. wassat good
    1. AllBiBek
      AllBiBek 8 September 2020 00: 59 New
      -2
      You have the US Democratic Party. It's enough.
      1. Revolver
        Revolver 8 September 2020 02: 08 New
        -2
        Quote: AllBiBek
        You have the US Democratic Party. It's enough.

        But there is also a Republican one.
        1. AllBiBek
          AllBiBek 8 September 2020 11: 49 New
          0
          But this is no longer enough.
          WASP is already less than half of the population, and in another 10-15 years will be in an outright minority.
          You will be devoured by emigrants, and posterity marginalized with college education at partly government expense, where they will be brainwashed in the faculties of feminism, gender sciences, and social anthropology.
          It is already the driving force behind your riots in the streets, and it is still just targeting. Riding street infantry.
          And to shoot - alas - is impossible, but-ta-ta in the pope from local bureaucrats from among the democrats.
  21. nikvic46
    nikvic46 8 September 2020 07: 17 New
    0
    Confidence in elections in the capital world will soon drop to zero, but I have never been there, and probably never will. One thing I know, with whom you will lead, that you will pick up. Maidan is so Maidan.
  22. Revival
    Revival 8 September 2020 09: 27 New
    0
    "So the outcome of the vote is becoming more unpredictable."

    It is strange how it is with them, undemocratic, does it happen that the current president is not sure of the result of the vote, usually the current president has a stable popular support of 80%, over and over again, the rest is from the evil one. Strange ...

    "However, there is even more intrigue in the answer to the question: will the American society accept this result?"

    Here again is an abnormal country, what kind of posing a question !?
    Society also can not accept something?
    Really, for cookies, out of stupidity, marginal people can also start to unconsciously rage, challenging the unapplicable fact that the overwhelming majority of the population is always for the current president, at least seven times in a row !?
    And let them think carefully, because if not Trump, then who?
  23. evgen1221
    evgen1221 8 September 2020 10: 05 New
    0
    How dependent we are on the will of the states. How important it is in our country since the 90s who will win the puddle and with what details. And there was a time when we didn’t care about their elections, well, maybe 100 people followed this at work.
    1. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 9 September 2020 21: 40 New
      0
      I don’t know, in the 70-80s. the pre-election race in the United States was covered in some detail by Soviet newspapers and television. And many Soviet citizens followed them with interest.
      1. evgen1221
        evgen1221 10 September 2020 06: 06 New
        0
        It is possible that they followed, but more for interest than with the consciousness that their specific life will radically depend on the choice of their leader.
  24. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 8 September 2020 12: 16 New
    +1
    The scenario of a civil war in the United States is quite possible. This scenario will leave us alone with China ... On the other hand, the winner will be the one who openly and with considerable force rolls over the former USA to plunder. This is one option. And the second - China, taking advantage of the paralysis of one of the two competitors, is falling down on us with all its might. This is the most likely option. We have no chances without nuclear weapons. Not with this power and not with this arrangement of the economic mechanism. With nuclear weapons ...
    In general, nothing good will happen.
    1. AllBiBek
      AllBiBek 8 September 2020 12: 49 New
      +1
      We were alone with China for a century, so since the 16th century, then there was no trace of the United States. To the word, that in terms of economy and population, China surpassed Russia at the end of the 16th century by about the same number of times as it is now.
      And?
      1. Mikhail3
        Mikhail3 8 September 2020 13: 02 New
        +1
        We were "alone" with many. For example, the Swedes were our implacable enemies and threatened the very existence of the Russian state. Are we now very much afraid of Sweden? As for the fact that China was "superior", it is "known" exclusively from Chinese sources. What sources the Chinese diligently destroyed, and then wrote anew at the accession to the throne of each new emperor. The Chinese both "invented gunpowder" and "went on voyages around the world", and wrote a lot of other things about themselves. In fact, the uniquely weak agrarian country never fought the conquerors, as they could not make the Chinese life worse. As a rule, there was nowhere ...
        But all this has nothing to do with the current moment. None at all. The belly does not remember yesterday's breakfast, no matter how rich and refined it was. Today we need new food, which must be obtained right now. And we are urgently needed food for China. Moreover, at the moment our government has completely and completely torn away from the people, does not enjoy any support, and is basically unable to manage the economy (unlike the Chinese). A unique moment to attack! But the Chinese have perked up incredibly to plan and look for favorable moments ...
        1. AllBiBek
          AllBiBek 8 September 2020 18: 00 New
          +1
          And when did the Swedes threaten us as a state?
          The northern borders - yes, but with a population 10 times smaller and 90% peasant - they had no chance even if they controlled more than 50% of the European iron market.
          1. Mikhail3
            Mikhail3 9 September 2020 09: 05 New
            0
            And you read about Peter's and pre-Peter's times. Precious reading in general)
  25. bzbo
    bzbo 8 September 2020 20: 20 New
    0
    America is preparing for "BAIDAN")))
  26. Pavel57
    Pavel57 8 September 2020 21: 15 New
    0
    Quote: leks
    what there may be "kush" except as the main chair in the white house.

    The president is a protege of certain circles. There is a fight between two large circles of the American
    business. Therefore, this is a struggle not only for power, but also for very large money.
    Or are you talking about democracy?)))
  27. Pavel57
    Pavel57 9 September 2020 10: 25 New
    0
    Quote: AllBiBek
    Their election is a competition, who will push through, and ours - who will push through. Do you understand the difference?

    And not vice versa?))))
  28. Sergey K
    Sergey K 10 September 2020 09: 22 New
    0
    Interesting. Apparently the boomerang is returning to the USA.
  29. Pavel57
    Pavel57 10 September 2020 12: 32 New
    0
    Quote: AllBiBek
    WASP is already less than half of the population, and in another 10-15 years will be in an outright minority.

    We'll have to close the USA project, the question is now, or it will be delayed.