Military Review

Russian Navy ships will receive target designator helmets to control AK-630 installations

76
Russian Navy ships will receive target designator helmets to control AK-630 installations

Crews of Russian Navy ships will receive special target designator helmets for controlling the AK-30 630-mm automatic artillery anti-aircraft gun. This was announced by Nikolai Borisov, deputy general director - general designer for military-technical policy of the Morinformsistema-Agat concern.


According to Borisov, the new target designation system for the AK-630 artillery mounts is currently undergoing factory tests. The target designator is designed to increase the effectiveness of hitting air targets in the near sea zone. In addition, the helmet can be used for primary target designation for surface targets.

We have developed a new version of optical-electronic guidance systems using helmet-mounted target designators. The operator, by turning his head, makes the initial guidance of the AK-630 to the target, and then the system locks the target automatically. The complex is undergoing factory tests

- TASS quotes the words of Borisov.

The deputy general director added that the development already has an export-standard passport and in the future can be exported.

AK-630 is a 30-mm six-barreled automatic shipborne artillery mount, adopted by the USSR Navy in 1976. In the name "6" means six barrels, "30" - caliber. Designed to engage air targets at a range of up to 4 km and surface targets up to 5 km. Until recently, it was installed on almost all ships of the Russian fleet.
Photos used:
https://ru.wikipedia.org
76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. aszzz888
    aszzz888 3 September 2020 09: 35 New
    +7
    Since there is such a thing in aviation, why not be in the Navy. The thing, I believe, is necessary and will be adopted.
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 3 September 2020 09: 47 New
      +8
      Quote: aszzz888
      Since there is such a thing in aviation, why not be in the Navy. The thing, I believe, is necessary and will be adopted.

      There are some doubts about this. In the plane, the crest is archival because not in all cases of air combat the radar will work, which, moreover, has significant restrictions on the sector of view. The ship has nothing of the kind, and why does he need a helmet ... somehow it is unclear
      1. Eug
        Eug 3 September 2020 09: 52 New
        +5
        As far as I know, in aviation, the helmet is interfaced with the seeker of missiles, which, after launch, are guided by themselves. And where will the "helmet bearer" control the installation from? And isn't it easier to make preliminary guidance of the AK-630 by sight?
        1. Temples
          Temples 3 September 2020 10: 37 New
          +2
          The cockpit has one significant difference from the ship.
          The pilot in the cockpit is ONE.

          The ship has specially trained people for such tasks.
          Places to place equipment like dirt.

          Apparently the helmet needs to be sold.
          1. Eug
            Eug 3 September 2020 14: 20 New
            0
            Do they not strive to combine the line of sight on the target and the line of fire? This significantly limits the placement. It seems that on anti-aircraft artillery complexes, they are trying to arrange the guidance radar and the barrels on the same base.
            1. Brylevsky
              Brylevsky 3 September 2020 16: 00 New
              +1
              Do they not strive to combine the line of sight on the target and the line of fire? This significantly limits the placement.

              A correction has already been introduced into the calculating device for the distance between the sighting column and the gun itself. A kind of "parallax correction" ...
              1. Eug
                Eug 3 September 2020 16: 33 New
                +2
                So I’m talking about the same thing when I talk about the limited location of the "helmet bearers" - it must be determined in advance, so as not to calculate the relative position and the corresponding correction when firing (calculate only the simplest option for changing the range and line of sight). As for me, any tenth of a second can be decisive.
                1. Brylevsky
                  Brylevsky 3 September 2020 16: 46 New
                  +1
                  So I'm talking about the same thing when I talk about the limited location of the "helmet bearers" - it should be determined in advance so as not to calculate the relative position and the corresponding correction when shooting

                  I understood you. And you will be able to understand that the correction "for parallax" can remain the same (it is already in the mathematics of the calculator), if the "helmet bearer" lol "tied" to the gunner's regular post - the sighting column.
                  1. Eug
                    Eug 3 September 2020 19: 32 New
                    0
                    Here! I'm talking about binding, but in a helmet it is not necessary (but it is desirable that there is only one correction) to bind to the sighting column.
                2. The comment was deleted.
        2. Cananecat
          Cananecat 3 September 2020 22: 47 New
          +2
          Operator gunner on the left, firing on the right.

          The AK-630 can be controlled both by a firing radar and in manual mode from an external post. So the appearance of such a helmet was a matter of time.
      2. pmkemcity
        pmkemcity 3 September 2020 09: 53 New
        14
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        There are some doubts about this. In the plane, the crest is archival because not in all cases of air combat the radar will work, which, moreover, has significant restrictions on the sector of view. The ship has nothing of the kind, and why does he need a helmet ... somehow it is unclear

        The ship has a turret that is paired with an AU. This helmet will be to replace, but rather to complement the turret. Very often, only one person is on the top (except for the helmsman), and there will be no time to run to the sighting column.
        Something like that:
        1. Ragnar Lodbrok
          Ragnar Lodbrok 3 September 2020 10: 03 New
          +9
          He himself stood on the sighting column on the direction-finding deck, in winter the gunner especially needs such a helmet ... I remembered thanks for the photo-youth ..
          1. Serg65
            Serg65 3 September 2020 11: 26 New
            -13
            Quote: Ragnar Lothbrok
            He himself stood on the sighting column

            what Was it right on the column? And what is this ship where you stood on the column?
            1. pmkemcity
              pmkemcity 3 September 2020 12: 06 New
              +7
              Everyone wants to shoot.
        2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 3 September 2020 10: 24 New
          -1
          Quote: pmkemcity
          Very often, only one person is on the top (except for the helmsman), and there will be no time to run to the sighting column.

          I, perhaps, do not understand something, but it seems that the helmet-mounted sight on the plane is connected to the device via a cable. That is, you still have to run - to the sighting column, to the helmet. Well, do not put the transfer of such data on wi-fi!
          1. pmkemcity
            pmkemcity 3 September 2020 10: 29 New
            +3
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            Well, do not put the transfer of such data on wi-fi!

            Why not? Yes, and lift the helmet off the back of the chair and go to the window, anyway faster ...
            1. Temples
              Temples 3 September 2020 10: 39 New
              -5
              Will there be a dozen helmets?
              Or will they transmit from head to head?
              Can everyone still hang a computer by the shoulders?

              They push the helmet to the sailors.
              Loot is higher than defense.
              1. Kart
                Kart 3 September 2020 15: 25 New
                +3
                Yes, stop singing this.
                The damned mode is completely loose, he is introducing electronics to the fleet.
                Close everything immediately, disperse the fleet, and distribute the money to pensioners.
            2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
              Andrei from Chelyabinsk 3 September 2020 10: 45 New
              +2
              Quote: pmkemcity
              And why not?

              If, again, I understand correctly, then the sighting column is a backup fire control system in case of failure of the main, that is, the radar of the OMS. And yet, the sighting column is used to destroy targets such as a surfaced mine and the like - but there is no particular rush there.
              But if we got knocked out of the LMS radar, then we are in battle, and there, among other things, there will be radio interference, so I would not hope for remote transmission - the signal, by definition, will be weak, you don't want a mini-power plant on head to wear. And no one wants to.
              Quote: pmkemcity
              Yes, and lift the helmet off the back of the chair and go to the window, anyway faster ...

              Not to everyone, but to the one where there is a corresponding connector. And one more thing - the porthole should provide an overview in the range of the AK-630. So isn't it easier to put the sighting column in such a place?
              Understand correctly, I am not claiming that I am right in everything, but from what I know, all this is somehow strange ...
              I'm not saying that these helmets cost colossal money.
              1. Cyril G ...
                Cyril G ... 3 September 2020 11: 05 New
                -2
                Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                I'm not saying that these helmets cost colossal money.


                Everything is correct. I personally don't see any sense. Now, besides the radar control system, new ships are also supplied with an optoelectronic control system.
                In any case, with the AK-630 in the extinguished light, you still cannot fight. Well this is not some kind of 2M3M. Although if it is honest - I would put a pair of ZU-23- "Naval" on our ships. just in case.
                1. pmkemcity
                  pmkemcity 3 September 2020 12: 30 New
                  +4
                  Quote: Cyril G ...
                  Although, to be honest, I would put a pair of ZU-23- "Naval" on our ships. just in case.

                  I'll tell you more - the watch officer has a PM, and the assistant also has a bayonet-knife to repel an attack!
                  1. Cyril G ...
                    Cyril G ... 3 September 2020 12: 53 New
                    0
                    Quote: pmkemcity
                    I'll tell you more - the officer of the watch has a PM


                    I will tell you even more so it does not happen in everyday service. And for firing with the ZU -23, unlike the AK-630, you do not need to open the VVD valves, you do not need to turn on the voltage converters 110/400 or 220/400 and turn on the firing chain at 27 V, well, turn on the 1K device itself, that is, the sighting column. If I remembered everything correctly wassat
                    1. pmkemcity
                      pmkemcity 3 September 2020 13: 04 New
                      +2
                      Quote: Cyril G ...
                      If I remembered everything correctly

                      And two lieutenants BCH-2 with warrant officers and sailors with them immediately overboard. Electricians are there too, don't you think you need them?
              2. Brylevsky
                Brylevsky 3 September 2020 11: 58 New
                +3
                If, again, I understand correctly, then the sighting column is a backup fire control system in case of failure of the main, that is, the radar of the OMS.

                Yes. And also if the reaction time of the LMS is not enough to generate data for firing.
                And yet, the targeting column is used to destroy targets such as a surfaced mine and similar

                Yes. For all purposes that cannot be accompanied by the standard Vympel radar. And also, in the case of the first point.
            3. vVvAD
              vVvAD 3 September 2020 11: 15 New
              +3
              Quote: Temples
              The ship has specially trained people for such tasks.
              Places to place equipment like dirt.

              You don't even need to go anywhere. It is necessary - they will mount observation turrets.
              Or, as an option - technical vision on each AK-630 (not literally): OLS (if necessary) + high-resolution focusable cameras.
            4. Brylevsky
              Brylevsky 3 September 2020 11: 49 New
              +2
              Why not? Yes, and lift the helmet off the back of the chair and go to the window, anyway faster ...

              No. Firstly, if the operator is inside the GKP, his design will create "dead sectors" for viewing - does he have panoramic glazing? Secondly, if the gunner is not on duty with a helmet on, how will he know that he has to shoot at full speed? The conclusion suggests itself: the gunner will be standing in the same place as before: at the sighting column. But instead of shooting through an archaic ring sight, his task will be to turn his head in the direction of the threat (command from the GKP: "Course ... Angle of elevation ... Fire"); put the aiming mark on the target by turning the head and press the "Fire" button on the handle of the sighting column. This is my assumption based on knowledge of the materiel of this gun and its control system.
              1. pmkemcity
                pmkemcity 3 September 2020 12: 12 New
                +1
                Quote: Brylevsky
                if the operator is inside the GKP, his design will create "dead sectors" for review - does he have panoramic glazing?

                At the GKP, the operator really has nothing to do. But on the bridge - that's it.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 3 September 2020 10: 51 New
          0
          Quote: pmkemcity
          Very often, only one person is on the top (except for the helmsman), and there will be no time to run to the sighting column.


          However..............
          1. Brylevsky
            Brylevsky 3 September 2020 12: 01 New
            +1
            However..............

            Well, like that ... Apparently, the watch at the GKP was not taken into account ... and at observation posts too.
            1. pmkemcity
              pmkemcity 3 September 2020 12: 25 New
              +1
              The CKU, for example, on the 956 project, is located below the main deck. How many people are there in the wheelhouse? What are they doing? Who's going to be on top of the ride? Everything is in business. And here is your first candidate for helmet bearers:
              "Responsibilities on the move of the ship
              826. The officer of watch is the direct assistant to the ship commander in matters of safe navigation, maneuvering, the use of weapons in sudden encounters with the enemy, evasion of attacks from submarines, aircraft, helicopters and combat boats, as well as from detected torpedoes and mines. "
              1. Brylevsky
                Brylevsky 3 September 2020 12: 39 New
                +2
                How many people are there in the wheelhouse? What are they doing?

                At a minimum, an officer of the watch, a helmsman of the watch and two lookouts. The commander of the ship can use his authority to approve any composition of the navigational watch, based on the current situation. But in addition to the wheelhouse, the ship has observation posts (visual), where the watch is also carried on.
                Listen, the officer of the watch has enough work to do, if he is still wearing this "Mambrin helmet", how will he navigate in the absence of the ship's commander on the run?
                1. pmkemcity
                  pmkemcity 3 September 2020 12: 49 New
                  +2
                  Why not lookout? If a smart kid? Although, I myself would play (in the sense of using weapons), I would not give it to anyone. Suddenly they break. Moreover, this is included in the direct duties of the officer of the watch, not as a signalman.
                  I never considered shipping as a "problem". Time to look at everything is more than enough.
                  1. Brylevsky
                    Brylevsky 3 September 2020 13: 07 New
                    +2
                    Why not lookout? If a smart kid?

                    Think for yourself. The helmet electronics can suddenly fail. Can? Yes maybe. What in this case can the lookout do, even if he is very intelligent? Nothing! And the officer of the watch cannot do anything, because they are not gunners. Yes, you can put any person behind the sighting column, show where the "Fire" button is (right grip, thumb) and show how to roughly determine the distance to the target, its angle, and what follows from this, but it is far from the fact that such a person can hit the target. Here you still need to take into account, and this is the main thing, that the gunner is on watch near the sighting column. This means that he can visually accompany the fired target even if such a helmet fails. Which no one else on the ship can do. Escort, and shoot ... This is my opinion. I think that it is quite logical.
                    1. pmkemcity
                      pmkemcity 3 September 2020 13: 11 New
                      +3
                      Quote: Brylevsky
                      The helmet electronics can suddenly fail.

                      Of course, everything can be broken ... or lost. Including the sighting column. and how many spare parts were stolen?
                      1. Brylevsky
                        Brylevsky 3 September 2020 13: 23 New
                        +1
                        Of course, everything can be broken ... or lost.

                        wink , thanks for reminding this anecdote laughing Nevertheless, if we reason from the point of view of logic, then it is better to shoot the one who has fired before. The reasons I mentioned above hi
                      2. pmkemcity
                        pmkemcity 3 September 2020 13: 24 New
                        -1
                        I will not deny the obvious.
              2. Cyril G ...
                Cyril G ... 3 September 2020 13: 01 New
                0
                officer of the watch, helmsman of the watch and two lookouts.

                Two signalmen on the wings of the bridge. Add a watchman at the navigation radar. If we have BG # 2, in our case, in theory, so they bring part of the AIA to a slow readiness to open fire ...
                1. pmkemcity
                  pmkemcity 3 September 2020 13: 17 New
                  +2
                  Quote: Cyril G ...
                  part of the AIA to not slow readiness to open fire ...

                  Yes, the right thing, what to say.
  2. Sahalinets
    Sahalinets 3 September 2020 15: 12 New
    0
    The problem with the AK-630 is not in the absence of a helmet, but in the fact that the radar and the gun itself are scattered in different places. And this dramatically reduces the aiming accuracy.
  • Kerensky
    Kerensky 3 September 2020 09: 40 New
    -1
    Should the operator turn his head outside?
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 3 September 2020 09: 40 New
    0
    We are getting closer to "computer games"! I don't see anything wrong with that. Operators can be trained right at home! I think in the sea, especially when pitching, such a helmet can have serious advantages.
  • JD1979
    JD1979 3 September 2020 09: 42 New
    0
    Idiocy ... Or hemp fields are burning somewhere.
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 3 September 2020 09: 48 New
      +3
      Quote: JD1979
      Idiocy...

      Rather, it is lobbying. Someone learned how to make helmet-mounted sights and really wants to sell them ...
      1. Ryusey
        Ryusey 3 September 2020 11: 41 New
        -1
        And this is bad?
  • tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 3 September 2020 09: 44 New
    0
    It is high time for air defense gunners to introduce such a thing into the navy, I have a question, the helmet will be a name, because everyone has different anthroparametric data on the head, and the gray matter in the head is also different. hi
    1. askort154
      askort154 3 September 2020 11: 49 New
      +1
      tralflot1832 ....the helmet will be a name, because each of the anthroparametric data of the head is different. And the gray matter in the head is also different

      The "gray matter" is the same, the number of neurons is different. wink hi
  • Brylevsky
    Brylevsky 3 September 2020 10: 01 New
    +6
    When firing from the sighting column, the distance to the target, as well as its movement parameters, was determined by the gunner "by eye" - by the comb of the "thousandths of the distance" in the reticle of the ring sight. No, well, they could, of course, tell the distance and speed from the BIP, if the target left time for this ... This is called "shooting at external target designation": heading angle, target elevation angle ... If there is no such "bonus" when shooting , then the gunner has to rely entirely on himself. So this is why I explain all this for so long and tediously: I hope that a laser rangefinder will be built into this miracle helmet, or the Vympel firing radar issues target movement parameters to the helmet so that the gunner can effectively fire, and not, in fact, at random.
  • Fibrizio
    Fibrizio 3 September 2020 10: 05 New
    -3
    For surface targets, like pirates, I can understand why he is, but you can't catch an air target with any helmet. The reaction is not enough. There will be no dive bombers. In a real war, hardly anyone will fly close to the ship. They will launch rockets at it and leave.
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 3 September 2020 10: 27 New
      +4
      Quote: Fibrizio
      and you can't catch an air target with any helmet.

      Why would you? The same subsonic anti-ship missile system flies more than a minute from the moment it leaves the radio horizon to the ship.
      1. Fibrizio
        Fibrizio 3 September 2020 10: 41 New
        +3
        And do you really think that it is worth giving target designation to a person visually on a RCC? You will be crammed full of them in this case. This should be done by the locator and automatic systems with cameras. And then you can't see much against the sun or at night, and the reaction is not the same.
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 3 September 2020 10: 58 New
          +1
          Quote: Fibrizio
          And do you really think that it is worth giving target designation to a person visually on a RCC?

          So this helmet, most likely, is a backup guidance system if the radar of the OMS is knocked out.
        2. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 3 September 2020 11: 08 New
          +1
          Quote: Fibrizio
          RCC is it worth giving target designation to a person visually? You will be crammed full of them in this case.

          RM-15 was actually cut down from the sighting column several times in fleets ...
  • evgen1221
    evgen1221 3 September 2020 10: 08 New
    -1
    And without this helmet whistle, didn't the machine itself manage?
    1. Brylevsky
      Brylevsky 3 September 2020 11: 03 New
      +1
      the machine itself could not cope?

      There is no machine gun there, except for the AO-18. In any case, a person presses the pedal in the firing post or the button on the grip of the sight ... The AK-630 is fired either according to the MR-123 Vympel radar, or from the sighting column, "by eye". In the first case, the maximum range of open fire is 4000 m, because up to this distance, the flight of the projectile is still described by equations and the central calculator, by their solution, generates full guidance angles, calculates the anticipatory point; in the second case, when shooting from the sighting column, "by eye", the maximum range increases to 5000 m, for the reason that although this problem cannot be solved mathematically, the gunner can correct his shooting by passing the tracers at the target.
      4000-5000 m, this is the maximum range, but this means that shooting at this distance will be effective. The effective firing range of this gun is 1500-2500 m, and at a distance of about 1 kbt. an experienced gunner hit the flare. Any ship commander, if circumstances permit, will deploy his ship so that the target would be fired upon by at least two AK-630 launchers, due to the peculiarities of the mode of firing from them.
      1. evgen1221
        evgen1221 3 September 2020 16: 21 New
        0
        Then another approach - what prevents the sensors from the helmet from shoving on the masts and by pressing a button everything that approaches the ship automatically for accompaniment?
        1. Brylevsky
          Brylevsky 3 September 2020 16: 40 New
          +3
          Then another approach - what prevents the sensors from the helmet from shoving on the masts and by pressing a button everything that approaches the ship automatically for accompaniment?

          Theoretically, nothing. This is the principle used by the American ZAK "Volcano - Falanx", there, too, all air targets are automatically taken for auto-tracking. We have a problem with the control system itself: you cannot jump beyond its limitations. It is high time to change it to a modern digital one, because sine-cosine rotating transformers, large-scale transformers, together with selsyn receivers and selsyn sensors are still used there, and all this telemechanical facilities in the conditions of the sea and vibrations require proper attention and care. That's, really, what designers need to think about ... and not about this "miracle helmet". If you cross the American control system from the Phalanx with the artillery unit from the AK-630, you get the world's best anti-aircraft artillery system for the near-field self-defense.
          1. D16
            D16 3 September 2020 20: 35 New
            0
            If you cross the American control system from the Phalanx with the artillery unit from the AK-630, you get the world's best anti-aircraft artillery system for the near-field self-defense.

            Americans do not like to include their R2D2. Afraid of the uprising of the machines lol ... The news says in plain text:
            "We have developed a new version of optoelectronic guidance systems using helmet-mounted target designators. The operator, by turning his head, initially guides the AK-630 to the target, and then the system locks onto the target automatically."
            IMHO this is an attempt to get away from American jambs without significantly reducing the reaction rate. The helmeted comrade is not a gunner-spotter, but a safety device in case our R2D2 is mistakenly aimed at the navigating bridge of a neighboring steamer on the order. And it's not a fact that it will stick out on the deck instead of the sighting column. Information from the ship's OLS can be displayed on the helmet. Like virtual vision, transparent steamer laughing and all that in the new traditions of aviators.
    2. Genry
      Genry 3 September 2020 11: 28 New
      0
      Quote: evgen1221
      didn't the machine do it by itself?

      Not everything is given to the automaton: it does not see everything (combination of the criteria of speed and dimension) and can identify "friend or foe" not everywhere.
  • 7,62h54
    7,62h54 3 September 2020 10: 10 New
    -3
    What happens if the helmet breaks down? How will target designation be carried out?
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 3 September 2020 10: 26 New
      +1
      Here it is rather like this - the main control center will be given through the fire control radar control system, and the helmet - in case of its failure
      1. D16
        D16 3 September 2020 21: 12 New
        0
        The control center will be given through the fire control radar control system, and the helmet - in case of its failure

        IMHO it is better to display a general virtual image from the OLS and radar station on the operator's helmet with the ability to select targets. Rather, the komputer will also recommend the order of destruction, and the operator only confirms by pointing his head at the target with a cross, thus controlling the process. This would be the most logical option.
    2. pmkemcity
      pmkemcity 3 September 2020 10: 52 New
      -1
      Quote: 7,62x54
      What will happen if the helmet fails? How will target designation be carried out?

      In this case - only with the "targeting" finger.
    3. Brylevsky
      Brylevsky 3 September 2020 11: 08 New
      0
      As before. Or the calculating device guides the gun according to the data from the radar and waits for the command "Fire", or the gunner from the sighting column fired into the sky, as if "a pretty penny". As it happens now.
  • pmkemcity
    pmkemcity 3 September 2020 10: 47 New
    -1
    Quote: Temples
    Will there be a dozen helmets?
    Or will they transmit from head to head?
    Can everyone still hang a computer by the shoulders?

    They push the helmet to the sailors.
    Loot is higher than defense.

    You look into the water ... and you see a parachute there. I think that it will not be a helmet in your understanding of a "motorcycle driver's hat", it will rather be something like virtual reality gaming glasses. One kit is enough on the bridge. On alert, all the sailors are still at their posts, and this is just "just in case."
  • pmkemcity
    pmkemcity 3 September 2020 10: 50 New
    -1
    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
    So isn't it easier to put the sighting column in such a place?

    So she stands where she should stand. Only the sailor is there, no conceived.
  • 3-e-09
    3-e-09 3 September 2020 11: 35 New
    -4
    All is well, but the sea is known to be rocky. Therefore, the operator with a helmet will need to be securely secured to the deck. There will be little joy if the operator in the helmet falls, and the gun turns perpendicularly downward and fires a burst into the ship's deck. It is necessary to take into account such situations in the development of promising weapons that have no analogues in the world.
    1. Winnie76
      Winnie76 3 September 2020 14: 03 New
      0
      Quote: 3rd-09
      There will be little joy if the operator in a helmet falls, and the gun turns perpendicularly down and fires a burst into the ship's deck

      This is yes. And if you just put the glasses down, the trunks with terrible force will bend into the letter G laughing
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 3 September 2020 18: 12 New
      +2
      Quote: 3rd-09
      All is well, but the sea is known to be rocky. Therefore, the operator with a helmet will need to be securely secured to the deck.

      Better to the mast.

      "Helmet operator Odysseus secures the ship's air defense against sirens." Canvas, oil.
      1. Petrol cutter
        Petrol cutter 3 September 2020 21: 11 New
        +1
        "Helmet operator Odysseus secures the ship's air defense against sirens." Canvas, oil."
        Air defense support apparently consists in a fiercely stern look in the eyes of the "sirens" patrolling over the ship ...
        From this look, they immediately lose all their flight performance characteristics and wonder how they got there, to such a life? ..
  • pmkemcity
    pmkemcity 3 September 2020 12: 42 New
    -1
    Quote: 3rd-09
    All is well, but the sea is known to be rocky. Therefore, the operator with a helmet will need to be securely secured to the deck. There will be little joy if the operator in the helmet falls, and the gun turns perpendicularly downward and fires a burst into the ship's deck. It is necessary to take into account such situations in the development of promising weapons that have no analogues in the world.

    Put a bold plus!
    And ribbons, one wonders. for what, in your opinion? In order to tie the signalman to the mast (it was the signalmen who had the experience, maybe they saw the demobels). Well, burnouts at signalmen with magnetized soles, so as not to tear them off the deck ...
  • iouris
    iouris 3 September 2020 15: 25 New
    0
    Will receive. And how and where will this affect the strategic balance?
  • garri-lin
    garri-lin 3 September 2020 15: 40 New
    0
    For the AK 306 version in the Vortex configuration, it may come in handy. And for a purely AK 630 I don't even know. As an addition to the column for displaying the arrow, information about the target and guidance parameters can and will come in handy.
  • Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 3 September 2020 21: 01 New
    +1
    The AK 630 is a highly respected machine. And I think its upgrades will delight the operators for a long time.
  • reader65
    reader65 3 September 2020 21: 13 New
    +1
    What kind of farsightedness should a person wearing a helmet have to see the PCR in frontal projection at a distance of 5 km?
  • DominickS
    DominickS 5 September 2020 07: 55 New
    0
    Can't the ship's BIUS perform these functions? Although, the thing is still not superfluous.
  • DominickS
    DominickS 5 September 2020 07: 58 New
    0
    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
    Well, do not put the transfer of such data on wi-fi!

    Why not? Not necessarily just wi-fi. You can simply make your own special radio channel, with a high polling frequency and encryption.