"The United States will have to kneel": Chinese Sohu assessed Russian ICBMs

The United States, constantly provoking Russia and stationing its troops on its borders, is walking on the edge of a knife. Russia is systematically re-equipping its Strategic Missile Forces (Strategic Missile Forces) with new missiles and, in the event of an armed conflict, will simply destroy the United States. This statement was made by the author of an article published in the Chinese edition of Sohu.

Russia is gradually re-equipping its Strategic Missile Forces with new missiles, putting the Yars, Avangard and Sarmat complexes on alert, conducting exercises to train all components of the nuclear forces. All this is done in response to the actions of the United States, which is trying to dictate its will to the whole world.

Russia and the United States, the author writes, are the largest nuclear powers in the world, but Russia is ahead of the United States both in the number of nuclear warheads and in the degree of development of its missiles. As of 2020, the United States has 5800 nuclear warheads in service, while Russia has 6275 nuclear warheads (including mothballed). With regard to ICBMs, it can be stated that the United States has only two types of missiles - the Minuteman-3 and Trident silo-based ICBMs for nuclear submarines, while Russia owns a whole arsenal of modern ICBMs - Topol, Topol-M, " Yars "," Rubezh "," Sarmat "," Voevoda "and others.

According to Chinese experts, Russia is armed with 300 ICBMs, which terrifies the White House. At the same time, the Strategic Missile Forces continue to receive missile systems, in the near future delivery of 15 more newest ICBMs is expected.

Russian missile systems are capable of overcoming American missile defenses and striking US territory. The newest missile "Sarmat", which will soon replace the "Voevoda", according to experts, can destroy up to 10 medium-sized American cities, and 30 such ICBMs - return the United States to a primitive society. Other missile systems include the Avangard with a gliding hypersonic unit, which can easily overcome missile defense and can fly from Moscow to Washington in 15 minutes. If Russia launches its missiles at the United States, then the Americans will have to kneel down and admit they are defeated.

Russia has drawn a "red line" for the United States, warning them not to play with fire. Moscow has warned that any missile launched towards Russia or their allies would be considered a nuclear warhead, regardless of whether or not it is. In response, Russia will retaliate with a nuclear strike that will be devastating for the enemy. If the United States does cross the line, it will feel the full power of the world's strongest ICBMs.

Comments

[antivirus]

the tiger wants to look at the fight from the side - hope for your benefit only for your work

[newcomer]

The "tiger" can now suddenly open up huge problems right under his nose.

[Shurik70]

If there will be an exchange of nuclear strikes, it will not seem like little to anyone.
Whether in China or in Brazil. And to the parties to the conflict, and not involved. The planet is one. Small.

[newcomer]

I exclude the option with nuclear weapons. As it has already voiced his point of view. It will be very hard for the nuclear weapons applicator to face the rest of the world. Perhaps, a global exchange of blows between us and the Yankees, when there is no one left. And with regard to a limited strike of nuclear weapons or tactical nuclear weapons, having acquired tactical "gingerbread", it will be strategically leveled dozens of times.

[neri73-r]

The winners write history, the rest will shut their mouths in horror.

[Senka naughty]

A "smart" monkey is more likely, but there are not enough tigers left, there is already so much gunpowder in the air, enough to light a cigarette. And China will see the decline of Western civilization.

[Berber]

Chet you guys are confused. It was about a monkey on a tree watching the tigers fight.

[newcomer]

Apparently colleagues see the role of China differently

[Ross xnumx]

You can scratch with your tongues, you can shrug your hands, you can cry into your waistcoat ... BUT !!!
KEY:

Moscow warned that any missile launched towards Russia or their allies, will be considered equipped with a nuclear warhead, whether it is so or not. In response, Russia will retaliate with a nuclear strike that will be devastating for the enemy.

Better not say!

[newcomer]

That's right, colleague. But excuse me, here we are all, including you, scratching our tongues, so to speak.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: newbie

But excuse me, here we are all, including you, scratching our tongues, so to speak ...

... Virtually, not really - we fill the fingertips on the keyboard and spit on the monitor ...
I expressed myself so figuratively only because I wanted to draw a line between the affairs and concerns of site users and people with real power.
It is these statements that inspire hope that the sovereignty of my country is strong enough.

[newcomer]

I agree. But you can rest assured. In the secret papers of the CIA 70/80. it was written by analysts that the USSR could destroy the pitiful NATO without much strain.

[Eragon]

Quote: newbie

I agree. But you can rest assured. In the secret papers of the CIA 70/80. it was written by analysts that the USSR could destroy the pitiful NATO without much strain.

I don’t know about 70-80, but in 87-89, when I studied at VU, they said that both the Americans and ours more than once simulated a global nuclear war and always with the same result: in the USSR, the destruction of 90-95% of industry, 85- 90% of the population, 15-25% of the territory suitable for life remains; in the USA 97-100% destruction of industry, 85-90% of the population, habitable territory about 5%. In short, who to plow, what to plow and where to plow we had, but they had only who, but what and where - no.

[meandr51]

Moreover, no plans and calculations were ever carried out in real wars.

[Eragon]

Quote: meandr51

Moreover, no plans and calculations were ever carried out in real wars.

Lord, do not bring me to check these calculations.

[Alex777]

Better not say!

Separately, it is good that we are not frightening the States, but the Chinese.

[Nadrub]

The Chinese did not take into account something ...
Maximum shmalnuyut in Voronezh or Khabarovsk :))) all offspring and broods of those in power live in Europe and America, so only Voronezh :))))

[Husit]

Quote: ROSS 42

You can scratch with your tongues, you can shrug your hands, you can cry into your waistcoat ... BUT !!!
KEY:

Moscow warned that any missile launched towards Russia or their allies, will be considered equipped with a nuclear warhead, whether it is so or not. In response, Russia will retaliate with a nuclear strike that will be devastating for the enemy.

Better not say!

I agree Vasilyevich, this is the only way to respond to any threats, briefly and clearly ..! It is not for nothing that the United States has quieted down in its aggressive rhetoric and actions in recent years .. Only stupid sanctions, which no one is particularly afraid of ..

[halpat]

Quote: antivirus

the tiger wants to look at the fight from the side - hope for your benefit only for your work

This "performance" SOHU reminded me of the cartoon "Mowgli"
Kaa - Russia, Bagheera - China, Baloo - Belarus;)

[businessv]

Quote: antivirus

the tiger from the side wants to see the fight

Not a tiger, colleague, dragon!

[newcomer]

Moreover, there are talks about the resumption of work on the "Barguzin" _ this is a clear horror in reality for the Yankees.

[Cyril G ...]

According to rumors, we have an "open" management system for Russian Railways. In order to launch this animal on Russian Railways, it is necessary to rebuild the SU and close it tightly.

[newcomer]

I believe that if the "Beast" is launched, then they will take into account all the points.

[Cyril G ...]

I would prefer to resume Courier

[newcomer]

Good too. I just could not find information on the resumption of work.

[Cyril G ...]

Alas. Such a system, let's say, is no longer invisible

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Cyril G ...

Alas. Such a system, let's say, is no longer invisible

Yes, you speak Russian:
"Alas ... Such a system, let's say, has less secrecy ..."
... (can be added) because, ... (hereinafter - a description of factors or a link)

[Victor Chernenko]

If it were to hold back the Reptilians. The agony of the states has begun.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Viktor Chernenko

If it were to hold back the Reptilians. The agony of the states has begun.

This is not the agony of the United States. This is a chance for Russian security! This is a guarantee of opportunities to develop without threats of physical destruction.
Russia is a kind and generous soul! But spitting in this soul is strictly forbidden!

[Vladimir Mashkov]

A GOOD song was invented back in the last century: "We are peaceful people, but our armored train is on a side track !!!"

[_Ugene_]

and in the event of an armed conflict will simply destroy the United States

well, they of course will sit and wait until we destroy them, such destruction will be guaranteed mutual

All this is done in response to the actions of the United States, which is trying to dictate its will to the whole world.

so far, they use economic methods to quite effectively dictate their will to the world, and if in the nuclear sphere we are on an equal footing, then in economic terms we are just a dwarf against a giant, unfortunately we can only take all the blows and wipe ourselves off, we cannot answer here

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: _Ugene_

well, they of course will sit and wait until we destroy them, such destruction will be guaranteed mutual

Does it say somewhere that we are going to attack them? It was said that they are guaranteed to receive a crushing response if at least one missile stray from their side flies in the direction of Russia.

Quote: _Ugene_

so far, they use economic methods to quite effectively dictate their will to the world, and if in the nuclear sphere we are on an equal footing with them, then in economic terms we are just a dwarf against a giant

So what? In 1941, the German economy was also an order of magnitude higher than in the USSR, besides, almost all of Europe worked for the Germans. As a result, it is not a sin to remind that Hitler in the bunker ate poison, shot himself and ignited spontaneously.

[_Ugene_]

Does it say somewhere that we are going to attack them?

the point is that such parity makes it impossible to use nuclear weapons, it makes no sense, so in any case no one will destroy anyone

In 1941, the German economy was also an order of magnitude higher than in the USSR

and where does Germany in '41? Nobody will attack us now, because look above, now this is done by orange revolutions and economic methods

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: _Ugene_

the point is that such parity makes it impossible to use nuclear weapons, it makes no sense, so in any case no one will destroy anyone

The point is precisely that the presence of nuclear weapons deter a potential aggressor from invading the country and physically destroying the population. Under the umbrella of nuclear weapons, you can safely deal with the economy. All more or less tidbits that mattresses could take away from countries that do not possess nuclear weapons, they took away by military intervention. Now they have a kind of "shortage" of potential patients that could be conquered with impunity and their resources appropriated, since the response could cause them unacceptable damage.

Quote: _Ugene_

Nobody will attack us now, because look above, now this is done by orange revolutions and economic methods

It is what it is. The method of waging hybrid wars is being improved and, using the example of small countries, has repeatedly proved its effectiveness. At the same time, shaking a country with a nuclear potential is fraught for the whole world with the fact that it is not known into which hands this potential will go and how it will be used. It may happen that its application will be unjustifiably accelerated. So it’s in their own interest not to plunge a nuclear country into chaos, but to negotiate.

[_Ugene_]

So it’s in their own interest not to plunge a nuclear country into chaos, but to negotiate.

therefore, they simply put pressure on by economic methods so as not to allow them to develop normally, and we cannot answer this with anything, because, in principle, we have no economic levers of influence on them

[Roman070280]

Does it say somewhere that we are going to attack them?

The fact that they are going to attack us is also not said anywhere ..
And all Solovyov's programs just need to believe less ..))

[askort154]

The United States, constantly provoking Russia and stationing its troops on its borders, is walking on the edge of a knife.

Even China sees this, in contrast to the Europeans, who will become the first victims as a result of uncomplaining lying under the United States.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: askort154

Even China sees this, in contrast to the Europeans, who will become the first victims, as a result of uncomplaining lying under the United States.

In Europe, too, the era of the uncomplaining performance of the role of the American concubine ends. Believe me, it's not just that in Germany they began to go to demonstrations and rallies. If in the United States itself the force of unrest and unrest approached its apogee, then in the neighboring hemisphere they also figured out the changing unipolar world dominated by America. There are plenty of problems of their own. And they are clearly not going to deny the growing economic development of Asia and the military power of the Russian Federation, China, and the presence of weapons in India, Iran and a number of other countries ...

[NEXUS]

The real advantage will be gained by the side that will be the first to create weapons on other physical principles, orders of magnitude higher in destructiveness than nuclear weapons. And our scientists and Western scientists are working in this direction. Already now they are talking in full about plasma weapons, laser weapons, so they are generally put into service, beam, climatic, etc. ... but there is no smoke without fire. And I would not be surprised if such a weapon has already been created. Painfully many all over the planet began to occur all sorts of catastrophes, and with prohibitive power. And it is quite possible that some part of these climatic changes is already on human conscience, and I'm not talking about environmental pollution or global warming.

[newcomer]

Moreover, I will not be surprised if in the near future we are presented with something from the category of working on other physical principles.
I remember all the media and inert ones too, our eyes were flooded with the families of AK, "Almaty", all kinds of electronic warfare, etc. and so on, which already itched in our eyes. I suggested that by this, perhaps, we were distracted from something grandiose, and so it happened. I daresay the real picture of the news is identical to the one.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: NEXUS

That side will get the real advantage, which will be the first to create weapons on other physical principles, orders of magnitude higher in destructiveness than nuclear weapons.

The possession of weapons based on new physical principles does not provide any real advantage. This is just a chance of relative safety from potential aggressors.
We live in a world that should be remembered:
“I don’t know what weapon a person will use to fight the third world war, but the fourth will be with a stick and a stone”
© Albert Einstein

[kamarada]

What what, but learned to kill and destroy

[voyaka uh]

Really: there are Yars against the Minutemans.
Topol-M are written off.
Warlords stand in mines without warheads.
Vanguards 2 pieces. It's more of a psychological weapon.
Yars is an accurate and modern rocket. She alone provides strategic
containment.

[aszzz888]

voyaka uh (Alexey)
Today, 10: 11
NEW
-5
Really: there are Yars against the Minutemans.
Topol-M are written off.
Warlords stand in mines without warheads.
Vanguards 2 pieces. It's more of a psychological weapon.
Yars is an accurate and modern rocket. She alone provides strategic
containment.

REALLY - nonsense and lies !!!! Fatty -

[voyaka uh]

Don't you think Yars is a good rocket?
She is:
1) solid fuel,
2) quickly ready to start,
2) the first tens of kilometers
overcomes very quickly - cannot be intercepted on takeoff,
3) up to 6 warheads of 150 kT each,
4) high accuracy up to 150 m KVO.
Americans know this and will never decide on a serious conflict with
Russia is still using such ICBMs.

[abrakadabre]

If Russia launches its missiles at the United States, then the Americans will have to kneel down and admit they are defeated.

If Russia has its missiles across the United States, it will be too late to take any, even the most erotic and submissive position. There it will be necessary to grieve a little about something else.

[iouris]

To prevent a potential partner from launching their missiles, a correct personnel policy is needed: but raise the children of your enemy! It's been almost forty years now, you know?

[evgen1221]

All this is certainly good, but oil is again canceled for many more than everyone else? Under politics, we will exhaust our own people, but we will bring in a bunch of gasterbayters, because they can be paid less and a trailer with a first aid kit from the social network is enough, then the presence of a hundred varieties of MBR does not look good.

[16112014nk]

Russia will retaliate with a nuclear strike

But only after the children, wives are taken out, bank accounts are closed, movable and immovable property is sold? Or before that?

[Bratkov Oleg]

My cousin is retiring this year, in December. Because she is 55 years old, the pension is legal. This damned Putin did this, if he honestly paid taxes - then on a pension like in the USSR. And if you didn't pay, why the hell should the state support you?
This is the case with missiles, the launch button for those who should be judged in The Hague by their rainbow Western European values ​​... And for them the loss of some Russian liberals, along with a brood, is just a reduction in the number of Russia's enemies. By the way, the liberals know this very well.

[ccsr]

It is even surprising that the Chinese published a fairly balanced article with a completely adequate assessment of the situation. For example, they precisely set the accents in our weapons:

Russia is gradually re-equipping its Strategic Missile Forces with new missiles, putting the Yars, Avangard and Sarmat complexes on alert, conducting exercises to train all components of the nuclear forces. All this is done in response to the actions of the United States, which is trying to dictate its will to the whole world.

This conclusion refutes the opinion of our couch "military experts", who here on the forum flood how we need tanks and other weapons, which are not even close to the power of our strategic nuclear forces, but require huge costs for their development and maintenance.

With regard to ICBMs, it can be stated that the United States has only two types of missiles - the Minuteman-3 silo-based ICBM and the Trident for nuclear submarines, while Russia owns a whole arsenal of modern ICBMs - Topol, Topol-M, " Yars "," Rubezh "," Sarmat "," Voevoda "and others.

Here is a confirmation of what we recently discussed in the topic about the unification of equipment and weapons of our army - it is ruinous to contain so many different types of missiles, which means we need to start with our ICBMs and pursue this policy in relation to all weapons.

The newest missile "Sarmat", which will soon replace the "Voevoda", according to experts, can destroy up to 10 medium-sized American cities, and 30 such ICBMs - return the United States to a primitive society.

Our sofa experts argue the opposite, that we supposedly should not be afraid of nuclear war, and its consequences are embellished by scientists. It seems that Chinese analysts understand these consequences better - and this is encouraging, at least the CCP will give up the idea of ​​trying to squeeze something from us by force.

Russia has drawn a "red line" for the United States, warning them not to play with fire. Moscow has warned that any missile launched towards Russia or their allies would be considered a nuclear warhead, regardless of whether or not it is. In response, Russia will retaliate with a nuclear strike that will be devastating for the enemy. If the United States does cross the line, it will feel the full power of the world's strongest ICBMs.

I am glad that even the Chinese realized that Putin will not stop to erase the United States into nuclear dust in the event of any provocation - let the staff remember this constantly, this is the guarantee of our peaceful existence.

[iouris]

Quote: ccsr

I am glad that even the Chinese realized that Putin will not stop to erase the United States into nuclear dust with any provocation

The main thing is for the USA to understand this. They realized that as long as the Russians think that there are some kind of treaties, the United States can solve any problem. No one will win the US elections in November, so there will be no one to demand compliance with the treaties. The most reasonable thing in this situation is to conduct nuclear tests. First underground. If they do not understand, then in the atmosphere. But the main thing is to remove all this from the drones.

[CBR600]

An article on the conflict over Taiwan. Or India ... I'm already confused with these Chinese =)
They are already tired =))

[Old26]

Crazy article with a bunch of blunders. There are a lot of examples of bloopers

As of 2020, the US has 5800 nuclear warheads in service, while Russia has 6275 nuclear warheads (including mothballed).

The author's figures seem to be correct, but this is the total number, including not only mothballed, but also tactical charges that are unlikely to be directly used against the United States. Rather, more will go to their allies. In reality, the parties have 3800 strategic BGs, respectively, in the United States and 4310 in the Russian Federation.

With regard to ICBMs, it can be stated that the United States has only two types of missiles - the Minuteman-3 silo-based ICBM and the Trident for nuclear submarines, while Russia owns a whole arsenal of modern ICBMs - Topol, Topol-M, " Yars "," Rubezh "," Sarmat "," Voevoda "and others.

We have always said that bleeding from the nose should be reduced the range of systems in service. The USA has always had 2-5 types of ballistic missiles, while in our country there were dozens of them. And nothing. 2-5 types of ballistic missiles The United States has maintained parity for decades, as we have maintained it with dozens of missile types. Now we are given credit for the existence of this "rocket zoo". True, the author either does not know, or forgets that we have an extremely small number of the same "Topols" left. Two, a maximum of three dozen, and they are intensively written off
"Rubezh" is not in service at all. After 5 flight tests, it was simply abandoned "as unnecessary". Maybe now, in the light of the termination of the INF Treaty, a couple of divisions will be deployed, but so far it is completely absent from the word. "Sarmat" is still a purely virtual complex, which had a couple of BIs and has not been able to reach the LI stage for a couple of years. Which on their own will last long enough.
"Voevoda" is still in service, but is gradually being reduced. What "other" ICBMs are known only to the author of this opus.

According to Chinese experts, Russia is armed with 300 ICBMs, which terrifies the White House. At the same time, the Strategic Missile Forces continue to receive missile systems, in the near future delivery of 15 more newest ICBMs is expected.

And the fact that the adversary has only an ICBM deployed 400 units does not cause any horror? What a nonsense. Does the author of this opus know that the total number of deployed media in the United States is 170 units higher than the total number of similar media in Russia? That the number of deployed carriers in the United States is 655 as of March 1, 2020, and in Russia 485. Who is terrified of what causes ???

The newest missile "Sarmat", which will soon replace the "Voevoda", according to experts, can destroy up to 10 medium-sized American cities, and 30 such ICBMs - return the United States to a primitive society.

Data for housewives and grandmothers on the bench. Any medium-sized city, for example, 500) is an area of ​​sometimes 400-600 square kilometers, and maybe more. How one charge can destroy such a city - I would like to know. It is possible to disrupt control, destroy a possibly large transport hub located in the city, a base in its vicinity with one charge. Destroy the CITY - let it remain on the conscience of the author. In fact, 300 warheads will be able to make the country, as a single controllable whole, cease to exist, but at the same time return the country to a primitive society - you need to have a very developed imagination. The same 300 warheads in Britain, the FRG or France with their territory is one thing - this is one thing. Quite different in a territory like the USA

Other missile systems include the Avangard with a gliding hypersonic unit, which can easily overcome missile defense and can fly from Moscow to Washington in 15 minutes.

You have to understand that the Chinese author has some kind of alternative physics. Or does his ICBM fly at a second space speed?

If Russia launches its missiles at the United States, then the Americans will have to kneel down and admit they are defeated.

And what should Russia do then when more missiles fall on it? Kneel down and admit defeat?
The author of this opus should remember the dictum that has already become historical: "THERE WILL NOT BE WINNERS IN NUCLEAR WAR"

Quote: voyaka uh

Really: there are Yars against the Minutemans.
Topol-M are written off.
Warlords stand in mines without warheads.
Vanguards 2 pieces. It's more of a psychological weapon.
Yars is an accurate and modern rocket. She alone provides strategic
containment.

1. "Topol-M" has not yet been written off. A simple "Poplar" is written off.
2. "Voevods" stand with BG, but their number is much less than usually published
3. How many "Vanguards" is not yet clear. Minimum 2, maximum 4.

[Bratkov Oleg]

Is a tactical warhead strike on a base or a US aircraft carrier formation, is it a strategic question, or not?

[Roman070280]

If Russia launches its missiles at the United States, then the Americans will have to kneel down and admit they are defeated.

What nonsense ..
If Russia launches its missiles at the United States, then the Americans will no longer be able to kneel down in front of anyone ... but they will still launch their missiles in response ... and there will be no losers in this game ... even from those who are in stood on the side ..

[Bratkov Oleg]

Delirium is nonsense, but the first Minutemans were dummies, and could not harm the Soviet Union from the territory of the United States.
Flights to the moon were dummies, and into Earth's orbit, into space, that is, the United States first came only 20 (twenty) years after Gagarin's flight ...
What else is fake in the USA, can you say? Their main weapons are bribery and blackmail.

[eklmn]

"... the whole people are having fun and rejoicing!" (words from an old song) ...
But the comments look like that too.
And now the situation - the United States launched its own nuclear missiles, Russia - its own. 1,5 thousand exploded in the United States. nuclear warheads, over Russia - 1 thousand. There is no US population, the remaining population of Russia is rejoicing. In the dark. After all, there is no electricity and the sun is not visible - the clouds are thick. And clouds around the globe. The entire crop dies after 2 weeks of darkness. There is nothing for the SOHU editorial staff. rice has long ended, but there are still many bats. The surviving Russians rush to the Baltic States for sprats, tk. theirs are over. The Russian Orthodox Church asks to use candles for lighting, and not for food. Well, etc.
"... the whole people are having fun and rejoicing!" (words from an old song) ...

[Bratkov Oleg]

Some of the US missiles will be shot down by the Russian missile defense system, and all Russian missiles will reach the target. Some of the US missiles will not take off at all, will either be destroyed, or equipment will fail.

[Husit]

And the United States has lagged behind Russia in many ways already .. Although the military budget has been inflated to a record size for all the time. They need a little victorious war .. Usually, before the presidential elections, this is their custom (Trump does not yet know who to bomb) Maybe someone in Africa ..
The Houthis are a good candidate, otherwise the Saudis are stuck there ...

[Klingon]

Quote: BerBer

Chet you guys are confused. It was about a monkey on a tree watching the tigers fight.

in general, China has always been associated and represented as a dragon. not a tiger or a monkey, although all 3 characters are somehow present in Chinese folklore

[Ovsigovets]

oh, these names are pretentious)))))) entirely click-beit of some kind ...... the right word tires. Each country is engaged in ensuring its security, its well-being and prosperity ...... if at the expense of others, then these are the problems of those others ..... stop already "kneeling" and other heresy. On each side there are grown-up guys and they calculate and develop and put in operation ... We must remember one thing for everyone .... beating the plates of the Russian Federation and the United States will most likely lead to the death of the planet, regardless of whose missiles will arrive faster and no one is hide

[acetophenone]

Quote: ROSS 42

You can scratch with your tongues, you can shrug your hands, you can cry into your waistcoat ... BUT !!!
KEY:

Moscow warned that any missile launched towards Russia or their allies, will be considered equipped with a nuclear warhead, whether it is so or not. In response, Russia will retaliate with a nuclear strike that will be devastating for the enemy.

Better not say!

Eh, my dear ... It has long been noticed that getting married and promising to marry are two big differences.

[Mikhail Zakharov]

pompous verbiage to amers of some trident will be enough to send our Russia to the Stone Age forever, but they never intended and are not going to attack first, they just don't need it

[Dzafdet]

I don't need a nuclear war. The Americans make great instruments, Bovidix, with a lifetime warranty. So let them do it. And then we stopped doing it, China alone is everywhere.
Better a bad world than a bad fight ..

[Dzafdet]

The Americans are pulling up troops to our borders: Poland, the Baltic States, Ukraine. Constant overflying of borders in order to collect intelligence information and identify modes of operation of air defense systems. In the Arctic, they stir, encouraging Japan to attack. Prepare for a lightning-fast and victorious war.

[shinobi]

The Yankees are not all right with the nuclear cycle and the chain of production of nuclear warheads. All this pretentious program to create low-power charges of the order of 10-12 kt, in fact, removing plutonium fuses from standard hydrogen ammunition of 125-250 kt. It got to ridiculous, NASA for its rover Curiosity bought plutonium of the desired enrichment and purity from Russia as a source of the heat generator, since no one in the United States took it up. There is no technological base. The Yankees fussed because, despite outright deception and ignorance of their treaty obligations, they lost their advantage in nuclear and missile paritete. It is clear that all their cries about their own lag are reduced to the thesis "give more money", but the awl in the bag is not utaish. Besides, if it is made of polyethylene.