Military Review

"The losses will exceed the results of the war of 1962": China warned India about the consequences of the conflict

49
"The losses will exceed the results of the war of 1962": China warned India about the consequences of the conflict

China warned India about the consequences of the armed conflict on the border between the countries. According to the Chinese newspaper The Global Times, in the event of an armed clash on the border, the losses of Indian troops will be more serious than during the 1962 border war.


Earlier, the Chinese Ministry of Defense accused the Indian military of illegally crossing the line of control in the border area. The Chinese military department demanded that New Delhi withdraw its troops to stop the further escalation of the conflict.

If India wants to compete, then it must take into account that China has more tools and opportunities than it does. If India wants a military confrontation, the People's Liberation Army of China (PLA) will inevitably cause the Indian army to suffer much more serious losses than it did in 1962.

- writes the edition.

It is argued that China will not provoke India, but it will not allow it to "invade its territory." At the same time, it is emphasized that New Delhi hopes in vain for the support of Washington, which can provide assistance only in words, but in reality, on the contrary, will strive to push China and India against each other.

On the eve of the Indian Ministry of Defense accused the PLA military of provocative actions in the border area in eastern Ladakh. According to the Indian military, the Chinese tried to change the status of the territory by capturing part of Indian land.
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 1 September 2020 10: 41
    +1
    In the photo as professional boxers before the fight. Eye to eye, stone face, but it reads that I will make a cutlet out of you.
    1. 7,62h54
      7,62h54 1 September 2020 10: 46
      +6
      The eyes are not readable, the photo is not legible. Rather, the Chinese looks at the warm hat of the Hindu and envies. It's uncomfortable in the mountains in an iron helmet.
      1. Insurgent
        Insurgent 1 September 2020 11: 11
        +2
        Quote: 7,62x54
        the Chinese looks at the warm hat of the Indian and envies. It's uncomfortable in the mountains in an iron helmet.

        How to say ...

        An ordinary, not "frost-resistant", like some kind of Gurkha, Hindu, begins to numb already at + 10, the Chinese are more hardy in this respect.
        1. 7,62h54
          7,62h54 1 September 2020 11: 20
          +3
          Gurkhas are the people inhabiting Nepal. This is a highland, and climatic hardships are not terrible for the Gurkhas.
    2. Terenin
      Terenin 1 September 2020 11: 04
      +1
      At the same time, it is emphasized that New Delhi hopes in vain for the support of Washington, which can provide assistance only in words, but in reality, on the contrary, will strive to push China and India against each other.

      Well they were in vain winked , American cowboy is a man of his word, not deed.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
    2. lucul
      lucul 1 September 2020 12: 05
      +1
      I will say such a cynical thing, but it was a blessing for the world, to halve the population of India and China, this will postpone the global ecological catastrophe of the Earth by 100 years.

      Nonsense, if you evict all people from the subtropical zone and give these lands exclusively for agriculture, then the Earth is able to feed 30 billion people.
      The only question is that for some people the soup is liquid, and for others the pearls are small. Of course, if everyone is provided with the needs of a billionaire, then there will not be enough resources for everyone, but if everyone is provided with incomes in the region of $ 500, then there will be enough for everyone.
      And so, humanity throws out resources for the development of unnecessary excesses, in the form of an iphone and other unnecessary luxury items - so they create an ecological disaster.
      1. Vasyan1971
        Vasyan1971 1 September 2020 12: 26
        +2
        Quote: lucul
        if you evict all the people from the subtropical zone

        Thanks, laughed! laughing
        Here, right, the benefactors were found!
        One for sanitary felling, the other for replanting ... wassat
      2. Klingon
        Klingon 1 September 2020 12: 30
        +1
        yes, your answer is in the style of Sharikov: "take everything and divide it in half" - if you give all the subtropics and tropics for agriculture, it will cause an ecological catastrophe of unprecedented proportions - erosion and drying of soils (HF forests retain moisture) and, as a result, depletion of the soil layer. Will you plant potatoes on concrete or will we go straight to hydroponics? all this will cause changes in the landscape and climate towards aridity, huge salt marshes will appear ... in short, as I understand it, it is not at all in the subject of the question, I recommend googleing and reading about the subtropics / tropics and slash farming and what it is fraught with ... and by the way, remember the Aral the sea, there, too, clever people like you decided to do hydro-reclamation in order to increase the yields of cotton crops and what came of this everyone knows
        1. forest1
          forest1 1 September 2020 12: 50
          0
          Just google about the fertile crescent. The cradle of agriculture. And see what is in its place now. In addition, monsieur does not know that almost all the land suitable for agriculture has already been put into circulation, and they are trying to involve land on which to plow under the settlements, even not very much.
        2. lucul
          lucul 1 September 2020 13: 58
          +2
          in short, as I understand it, you are not at all in the subject of the question, I recommend to google and read about the subtropics / tropics and slash agriculture and what it is fraught with ... and by the way, remember the Aral Sea

          Oh Gospad ..... back in the 19th century it was believed that the Earth is not able to feed 2 billion people, are you one of the same believers?
      3. 7,62h54
        7,62h54 1 September 2020 16: 39
        +3
        Raising the income of everyone to $ 500 is not a problem; it is a much bigger problem to lower it for a part of the population to $ 500.
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 1 September 2020 10: 54
    +2
    Wow, the Indians had losses there! Almost 6.5 thousand killed, wounded and captured. A weighty threat ...
  4. Sergey Obraztsov
    Sergey Obraztsov 1 September 2020 10: 56
    -2
    I suggest, as in one old bike - Give the disputed territory to a third party (Russia). The subject of disagreement will immediately disappear.
  5. newcomer
    newcomer 1 September 2020 10: 57
    -1
    India will not pull on two fronts, because Pakistan will certainly seize the moment.
  6. rocket757
    rocket757 1 September 2020 10: 57
    0
    Interesno, and who benefits from it ???
    It is clear that the conflict is old, but to inflate it to a serious scale is not just that.
    1. newcomer
      newcomer 1 September 2020 11: 00
      0
      The Britons and their Yankees have a wealth of experience in this matter.
    2. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 1 September 2020 11: 04
      0
      The population is growing very quickly .... resources are getting smaller. Hence such conflicts. But nuclear weapons are there and there and can be a lot of fun. Victory at the tactical level can provoke a nuclear strike.
      1. newcomer
        newcomer 1 September 2020 11: 14
        -4
        I disagree. No one will allow either one or the other to use nuclear weapons. This step will be fraught with global losses for the "daredevil" who used nuclear weapons, and these losses will exceed the possible "gesheft", and who will need a "gesheft" with vigorous gusto? Moreover, the Britons, who want to return India under tight control, the polluted territory is useless. The bottom line will be simple: the Indians are piled on, the brits will return them under their control under the guise of protection, support, etc., etc.
        1. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 1 September 2020 11: 16
          +5
          They will not ask anyone. This is not Europe ... and the Britons have already lost everything there. Forever and ever. The attitude to life in Asia is completely different.
          1. newcomer
            newcomer 1 September 2020 11: 22
            -2
            I repeat once again, if someone thinks that he can get tactical luck by using YAO, it will be so, but strategically, luck will be leveled dozens of times. Therefore, no one will apply. And you are wrong about the brits. But wanting and returning different things, I hope they will not succeed. After all, with the exit from the EU, Britam desperately needs space for a moneuver and free labor.
            1. Zaurbek
              Zaurbek 1 September 2020 12: 04
              +2
              The war with the use of TNW is still stirring the minds of the generals. Even a renaissance began in Europe and America. I am silent about Asia
              1. newcomer
                newcomer 1 September 2020 12: 06
                +2
                Break off.
      2. The eye of the crying
        The eye of the crying 2 September 2020 09: 27
        0
        Quote: Zaurbek
        The population is growing very quickly ...


        China's population is practically not growing.
  7. Kostadinov
    Kostadinov 1 September 2020 11: 01
    0
    At the same time, it is emphasized that New Delhi hopes in vain for the support of Washington, which can provide assistance only in words, but in reality, on the contrary, will strive to push China and India against each other.

    The fascist government of Modi in India has already led the country into an economic catastrophe and is heading for a military catastrophe of an unprecedented scale in the history of India. If the Indian revolution stops Modi before the war, so much the better, but if not, then the revolution will be after the war.
    1. Doliva63
      Doliva63 1 September 2020 19: 29
      0
      Quote: Kostadinov
      At the same time, it is emphasized that New Delhi hopes in vain for the support of Washington, which can provide assistance only in words, but in reality, on the contrary, will strive to push China and India against each other.

      The fascist government of Modi in India has already led the country into an economic catastrophe and is heading for a military catastrophe of an unprecedented scale in the history of India. If the Indian revolution stops Modi before the war, so much the better, but if not, then the revolution will be after the war.

      What kind of revolution are you talking about - "color" or socialist?
  8. APASUS
    APASUS 1 September 2020 11: 05
    +1
    Hope for Washington in this conflict can only be for help in the development of the conflict, no matter which side it is!
    The Americans are solving a bunch of geostrategic problems right after the start of military escalation
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 1 September 2020 11: 17
      0
      I agree. And they will have a convenient geographic base for their military in the Indian Ocean.
  9. Just a Traveler
    Just a Traveler 1 September 2020 11: 19
    -1
    Hindus will be oppressed ...
  10. Livonetc
    Livonetc 1 September 2020 11: 24
    0
    And what happened in 62 in terms of the scale of the confrontation?
  11. Pavel57
    Pavel57 1 September 2020 11: 36
    +1
    Quote: Wwk7260
    I will say such a cynical thing, but it was a blessing for the world, to halve the population of India and China, this will postpone the global ecological catastrophe of the Earth by 100 years.


    The United States is definitely interested in this, as well as in a war to overcome the crisis.
  12. Vladimir_6
    Vladimir_6 1 September 2020 11: 46
    +1
    At the same time, it is emphasized that New Delhi hopes in vain for the support of Washington, which can provide assistance only in words, but in reality, on the contrary, will strive to push China and India against each other.

    It will look like this:
    "If we see that India is winning, then we should help China, and if China is winning, then we should help India, and so let them kill as much as possible!"
  13. Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 1 September 2020 11: 53
    +3
    What are the Nanai boys being distracted from by the struggle this time? From what events?
    From Riots in Europe?
    In Sweden, the Koran was burned or Putin was chanted in Berlin ...
  14. tarabar
    tarabar 1 September 2020 12: 01
    +5
    Well, what do you want, here is the most promising point of tension for organizing a promising TMV. Hindus and Chinese have nothing in common: race, faith, culture, socio-political structure. There are practically no unifying points, but these states are on the rise and will soon enter the expansion phase, only their natural habitat is the same and they are forced to collide in it. For external puppeteers, both states are ideal options for the role of the main participants in TMV: the countries are not poor, which means they can sell weapons and ammunition for quite real money or assets, unlimited human resources, which means they are capable of long-term confrontation and are resistant to losses, they are removed from Western states - the beneficiaries, it means that it is not so scary, it is possible to resolve issues with refugees at distant borders and, in which case, radioactive ash will not fall on your head. For the undercover organizers, the main task is not to bring the conflict to a nuclear one, but to the usual conventional one between India and China + Pakistan, they will be happy and will tear more than one button accordion if this happens. And by the way, the idea of ​​halving the population of these countries in this context, I am sure, is also being considered and may be a priority. The idea has long been hovering that the current socio-political and economic formation of the West is not able to get out of the crisis without a global war, only it is scary to climb into it, and with the wrong hands away from home you can get solid pluses and not any significant minuses.
    1. Essex62
      Essex62 1 September 2020 12: 54
      0
      Near their habitat, not small, sparsely populated Far East and Siberia. In general, it is amazing how one and a half lard of the Chinese manage to stand on a piece of land, on one leg, shoulder to shoulder, and still have not rushed to empty lands, and even rich in all sorts of goodies.
      1. wt100
        wt100 1 September 2020 18: 05
        0
        Then already for the Chinese several fronts may open up, with the Russians, the Indians will not oversleep the territory to expand, but they need to cover their back
      2. Shraik
        Shraik 1 September 2020 21: 25
        0
        1. A piece of land? China? It is the third largest country in the world.
        2. If you look at the population density map of China, you will notice that the bulk of their population lives in the southeastern part. And the areas close to our Far East are just poorly populated. They already have a lot to expand. In addition, the farther north, the more severe the climate.
        3. And there is also such a state as Mongolia. Why not them? The territory is huge. The army is weak. Long shared border with China. I don't want to take it. But there is not even a hint of this. But there are graters with India.
        1. Essex62
          Essex62 2 September 2020 08: 36
          +1
          And Mongolia as well. This is what we are talking about. It's strange.
          If the USSR had such a population, there would have been no bourgeois and not a single gay man for a long time.
      3. Quadro
        Quadro 2 September 2020 21: 49
        0
        Quote: Essex62
        Near their habitat, not small, sparsely populated Far East and Siberia. In general, it is amazing how one and a half lard of the Chinese manage to stand on a piece of land, on one leg, shoulder to shoulder, and still have not rushed to empty lands, and even rich in all sorts of goodies.

        Again a stupid organ about dv and Siberia. These regions are what Taiwan wants, not China.
        1. Essex62
          Essex62 3 September 2020 09: 28
          +1
          It is necessary to read carefully, and I wrote that China does not want or is rather afraid of circulation. And I want and inject ...
  15. Antonio_Mariarti
    Antonio_Mariarti 1 September 2020 12: 41
    0
    I think that if a conflict happens, then it is necessary to support India and the Russian Federation, not China.
    1. iouris
      iouris 1 September 2020 12: 52
      0
      Quote: Antonio_Mariarti
      then you need to support

      "Take me to the Himalayas!"
      They are several times larger (more) than the RF. If a conflict happens, then it is needed. On the territory of the Russian Empire (in Estonia) on the border of the Russian Federation, there is a "conflict" of its own: US troops deployed high-precision MLRS, but there are no opportunities and forces to resolve it. Or no interests. Unclear.
      1. Postum
        Postum 1 September 2020 15: 59
        -2
        As long as you consider Estonia the Russian Empire, of course there will be US MLRS
        1. iouris
          iouris 1 September 2020 16: 31
          +1
          MLRS indicate that Estonia is now an American empire. It doesn't even make sense to talk to Estonia on this issue, it is a testing ground. And that's all.
          1. Postum
            Postum 1 September 2020 17: 20
            -2
            Well then, Donbass is a training ground for Russia, and in a combat situation
  16. Vladimir61
    Vladimir61 1 September 2020 13: 33
    +1
    And where is the UN, where is its concern and peacekeeping forces? This is not a conflict between two banana countries. The conflict between two nuclear powers with a population of more than 34% of the world's population and clearly fueled from the outside in order to slow down China's influence on the world economy.
  17. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 1 September 2020 14: 51
    +1
    Something our yellow-faced friends began to talk often .. isn't it time for us to slowly leave this strategic partnership .. it hurts to remind me of another partnership, before BB2 ..
  18. Husit
    Husit 1 September 2020 17: 44
    -1
    China is clearly rude! As if the dragon's wings did not burn in flight .. You can't threaten that!
  19. d4rkmesa
    d4rkmesa 1 September 2020 19: 20
    +1
    Cunning Chinese are still provocateurs. They caught the rajahs when they came to the "mahach", saved a cube with nails, and they themselves came in a huge crowd. They killed half of the squad then, and now they blather about provocations. I fully understand the rajahs, they want revenge. They would have symmetrically caught the detachment and pummeled bags of rice, the incident would have been settled.
    1. gsev
      gsev 2 September 2020 19: 10
      0
      Quote: d4rkmesa
      They would have symmetrically caught the detachment and pummeled bags of rice, the incident would have been settled.

      The Chinese were simply building a road on the territory that they honestly won from India 60 years ago. The Indians sent special forces and beat the Chinese builders several times, but after the Chinese replaced their builders with special forces, the fights stopped. At one time, India had good relations with the Himalayan states. But the last time India blocked Nepal right after the earthquake in that country, hoping to gain privileges. If the Chinese build a road to Nepal, India will begin to lose a very convenient market for itself. China will ensure its development without a war, and India is unlikely to correct its economic and trade failures by military action. Imagine if the Syrians, in response to every new construction on the lands occupied after 1947, send troops there to dismantle the design documentation?