"We plan to transmit in December": the corvette "Thundering" continues testing

The head corvette of project 20385 "Thundering" is planned to be transferred to the Naval fleet RF in December this year, and not at the end of August as previously reported. This was announced by the general director of Severnaya Verf, which built the ship, Igor Orlov.

Answering the relevant question, Orlov explained that the "Gremyashchiy" corvette is currently being tested at sea, and according to the enterprise's plans, the ship's transfer to the customer is scheduled for the end of the year. The corvette is intended for the Pacific Fleet.

He is currently on trial at sea. We plan to transfer in December

- he said.

Earlier, Severnaya Verf announced plans to transfer the corvette to the fleet at the end of August, immediately after passing the state tests. This was stated by the former general director of the enterprise Igor Ponomarev. The duration of the tests, which had already been 9 months in mid-June, Ponomarev explained by the desire of the Ministry of Defense "to check the lead ship more thoroughly."

The 20385 Project “Thundering” is the lead ship of the series. Laid down in February 2012, launched in June 2017. Construction was delayed due to the non-delivery of German MTU power plants. The corvette was completed with Russian diesel engines 1DDA-12000 of the Kolomensky plant. The unit consists of two 16D49 engines with 6000 horsepower.

The ship is a further development of project 20380. Designed to detect and destroy surface enemy ships or submarines, organize landing, guard the coastal zone, escort other ships.

Displacement - 2200 tons, length - 104 m, width - 13 m, speed - up to 27 knots, cruising range - 3500 miles, autonomy - 15 days crew - 99 people.

The armament includes the universal naval rifle complex (UKSK) for the Caliber, Onyx and possibly Zircon, Redut air defense systems, the 100-mm A-190-01 artillery system, two AK-30-mm anti-aircraft artillery systems 630M, as well as anti-submarine complex "Package".

Comments

[Doccor18]

The latest version of the super corvette.
The fleet is waiting for him.
And we are waiting for the fleet to start replenishing with full-fledged ships of the far sea zone, the construction of which did not exceed 48 months ...

[Grandfather]

three ! years, on the water ... tin. it looks like there will be four. and this is not a destroyer, but a patrol type, 8 launchers ... a boat damn it. Doesn't the Chief Commander bother?

[Kart]

Well, it seems everything is written in the article ...
No to read.

[Temples]

Quote: Doccor18

The latest version of the super corvette.

Not the last one.
There are already plans to increase the cells.
Rest only in our dreams.

[bayard]

What cells? The 20385 series will be limited to two cases for now. When new YES with a capacity of 10 l / s appear, it is possible to continue the series with a new power plant and better driving characteristics. But it looks like a long way off.
Or are you about misunderstanding 20386?
Well, everything seems to be hanging with him. And this is good . For both in displacement it is quite a frigate, and at a price like "Gorshkov", and it does not have a power plant.
But as a frigate, it is worse than the Gorshkov in everything.
Yes, and raw - not even a project. Even the sketches were constantly changing.
And as a corvette, it is TOO expensive for the BMZ corvette, which should be massive.
Without normal engines, we will have neither corvettes nor frigates ...
... And with engines - they will.

[Serg65]

Quote: Dead Day

Doesn't the commander in chief worry?

The commander-in-chief is worried that the ship would be operational, and not run for years on the seas, on the waves with a bunch of "science" on board!

[Grandfather]

Quote: Serg65

Quote: Dead Day

Doesn't the commander in chief worry?

The commander-in-chief is worried that the ship would be operational, and not run for years on the seas, on the waves with a bunch of "science" on board!

8 launchers-combat-ready? And then what kind of "Arlie Burke" with a hundred missiles?

[Serg65]

Do you have a car at home?

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: Dead Day

8 launchers-combat-ready? And then what kind of "Arlie Burke" with a hundred missiles?

You are comparing a corvette with a displacement of 2200 tons (lead) and a destroyer, the first series of which was a displacement of 8448 tons, and the IIA series - 9648 tons (Wikipedia data).
I am amazed at your talent and give a standing ovation!

[Stas157]

Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich

You are comparing a corvette ... and a destroyer
I am amazed at your talent and applaud while standing!

And he is in the presence of something, smart guy, to compare? I'm talking about a destroyer. This is how Russia will produce destroyers, so no one will think of comparing them with corvettes. And now they are comparing exactly what they have.

[Serg65]

Quote: Stas157

And he is in the presence of something

Smart guy, and Old Dedka with what destroyer does this corvette compare? Smart ass!!!

[novel66]

but not even with a destroyer. hello petrel!

[Serg65]

So the corvette has never been a destroyer, the young eagle is healthy!

[novel66]

what the hell am I young? hazing ???

[Serg65]

Statement of fact!

[Stas157]

Quote: Serg65

Smart guy, and Old Dedka with what destroyer does this corvette compare? Smart ass!!!

I understand your irritation. But your thought is not. What did you want to give birth to there? ... Although, as practice shows, to enter into conversations with you is only time to waste.

[Serg65]

Quote: Stas157

I understand your irritation. But your thought is not.

Well, in the absence of thought and logical thinking in your head, I was convinced for a long time!
Give birth? But what is there to suffer if the deficiency of your gray matter still does not master it!

[novel66]

more than a hundred is a "ticonderoga", the Berks have less

[Volder]

Quote: Dead Day

8 launchers-combat-ready? And then what kind of "Arlie Burke" with a hundred missiles?

The American destroyers also carry 8 Harpoon anti-ship missiles.

[Fizik M]

Quote: Serg65

The commander-in-chief is worried that the ship would be operational, and not run for years on the seas, on the waves with a bunch of "science" on board!

I am now bursting into tears with emotion
https://topwar.ru/156337-kuda-bezhit-admiral-evmenov.html
https://topwar.ru/157559-apkr-severodvinsk-proekt-885-jasen-sdan-vmf-s-kriticheskimi-dlja-ego-boesposobnosti-nedodelkami-protivotorpednoj-zaschity-podlodok-vmf-rf-net.html
there clearly how he "cares" (in quotes)
with FACTS and DOCUMENTS

[Serg65]

Quote: Fizik M

I am now bursting into tears with emotion

Cry, it will become easier! And don't close the hole in your head with your finger, otherwise the lack of ventilation will ignite the brain!

Quote: Fizik M

there clearly how he "cares"

Maxim Alexandrovich, both of your references are about the unavailability of weapons, and not about the state of readiness for operation of ship mechanisms, means of combat control of the ship and means of control of weapons! Have you ever accepted a ship from industry !!!

Fizik M (Maxim)
And now "a very good question" - with what was the industry commissioned Yuri Dolgoruky

Here's how to answer this question, you need to understand why the head Boreas received such a name! Can you answer that?

[novel66]

eh, damn it! I had to name Ivan the Terrible

[Serg65]

Why not Ivan the Terrible, let Klimov tell me better!

[timokhin-aa]

And you have to run from the factory to the landfill and back with a bunch of science on board.
And to all 20380 starting from Tsydenzhapov too.

[Serg65]

Quote: timokhin-aa

And you have to run from the factory to the landfill and back with a bunch of science on board.
And to all 20380 starting from Tsydenzhapov too.

You, Alexander and your friend, the hydromayor, should have asked how the ships surrendered to the fleet in the Soviet Union and in the 90s, this is in the first place!
Secondly ... which plant? On the one that does anti-torpedoes? So the Thundering One will not reach him so amicably
And thirdly ... Gorshkov's round-the-world trip spoiled the blood of many "experts"!

[timokhin-aa]

You, Alexander and your friend, the hydromayor, should have asked how the ships surrendered to the fleet in the Soviet Union and in the 90s, this is in the first place!

This is not an excuse.

Secondly ... which plant?

But on which he has been standing for two months without a break.

And thirdly ... Gorshkov's round-the-world trip spoiled the blood of many "experts"!

Is this a hint of what? Sergei, a person who considers it necessary to conceal from the public the facts of the delivery of non-combat capable ships to the Navy, is called not by the word "patriot", as you may think, but by the word "traitor." Is this clear?
"Gorshkov" at the time of the trip around the world was brought. The fact that the ship was driven on such a campaign is very good.

But this is not relevant to the issue under discussion.

[Serg65]

Quote: timokhin-aa

This is not an excuse

This is not an excuse - this is advice!

Quote: timokhin-aa

on which he has been standing for two months without a break

For what is it worth? Because of the torpedoes?

The duration of the tests, which in mid-June were already 9 months, Ponomarev explained by the desire of the Ministry of Defense "check the lead ship more closely".

On March 11, 2020, the corvette sailed into the Barents Sea from Severomorsk and headed for the Baltic. Being in the Northern Fleet, "Thundering" from November 2019 passed state tests, a new stage in the verification of systems and units will be held at the training grounds of the Baltic Fleet.
It is trite ... the head of the team will declare that he does not like the noise of the bilge pump, on the basis of this the groupman will refuse to accept the bilge equipment !!!

Quote: timokhin-aa

on which he has been standing for two months without a break.

This is Alexander, he only says that the industry cannot put pressure on the ship's commander and about "Evmenov's powerlessness to cut the budget together with Rakhmanov"

Quote: timokhin-aa

a person who considers it necessary to conceal from the public the facts of the surrender of incapacitated ships to the Navy is called not by the word "patriot", as you may think, but by the word "traitor." Is this clear?

And a person lobbying by any means one of the manufacturers of weapons for the Navy, what do you call it?

Quote: timokhin-aa

a person who considers it necessary to conceal from the public the facts of the surrender of non-combatant ships to the Navy is not called "patriot"

With regard to the Thundering One, what is hidden from the public? Specifically?

Quote: timokhin-aa

"Gorshkov" at the time of the round the world was brought

As it does not fit with your theory with Klimov about the complete collapse of the Russian Navy!
Although in my memory this is the first circumnavigation of the ship that has just been accepted into the fleet!

Quote: timokhin-aa

this is not relevant to the issue under discussion.

And what is the question then?

[timokhin-aa]

With regard to the Thundering One, what is hidden from the public? Specifically?

The inability of the radar to confirm their performance characteristics.

As it does not fit with your theory with Klimov about the complete collapse of the Russian Navy!

Do not attribute to other people what they have never claimed.

[Serg65]

Quote: timokhin-aa

The inability of the radar to confirm their performance characteristics.

The whole Internet knows about this, but the public does not know! ???

Quote: timokhin-aa

they never claimed.

Why not that in your articles there is only one leitmotif - "Everything is lost, we will perish, admirals on the yard !!!"?

[timokhin-aa]

The entire Internet knows, and you pretend that this is the way it should be.

Regarding the leitmotif, I make very specific claims about how our state "develops" the Navy. And I also have good articles about the fleet, and there are a lot of them. So don't juggle.

[Serg65]

Quote: timokhin-aa

The whole Internet knows, and you pretend that this is how it should be

By no means Alexander! On the contrary, I am very outraged by the fact that the FSB, represented by the counterintelligence of the Navy, does not catch mice at all, constantly merging highly classified information into the worldwide network !!! Moreover, some zealous citizens, including you, are indignant that the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy himself does not share secret information with the "public"! Let me ask you, Alexander, but why should the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy inform the "public" about the problems of radio-technical armament of the newest ship ???

Quote: timokhin-aa

I make quite specific claims about how our state "develops" the Navy

Claims are good ... but what are the real reasons for this "development" of the Russian Navy, can you tell me?

[timokhin-aa]

By no means Alexander! On the contrary, I am very outraged by the fact that the FSB, represented by the counterintelligence of the Navy, does not at all catch mice, constantly merging highly classified information into the worldwide network !!!

The fact that our sailors will have to repel air strikes with non-working air defense systems does not bother you? Okay, you're at least honest. Just remove the Russian flag from the avatar, otherwise some kind of dissonance comes out. You need American or Japanese there. Maybe British. But not ours for sure.

Let me ask you, Alexander, but why should the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy inform the "public" about the problems of radio-technical armament of the newest ship ???

The Commander-in-Chief absolutely does not need to share anything, because everything is already known, and it was known even before this Commander-in-Chief became Commander-in-Chief. This is one of the advantages of a democratic society - the authorities cannot fool people even if they try. But here they are not trying, by the way. Until.

Claims are good ... but what are the real reasons for this "development" of the Russian Navy, can you tell me?

Upstairs there are corrupt officials who are ready to supply idle trash to the troops for the sake of filling their pockets, downstairs there are uryakalka like you, who actively applaud these crimes. And they try to shut their mouths to those who do not want to agree with them.

[Serg65]

Quote: timokhin-aa

Only remove the Russian flag from the avatar

Sasha, how much anger is that! This pride gnaws at you, it's not good!

Quote: timokhin-aa

our sailors will have to repel air strikes with non-working air defense systems

Sasha, unfortunately I am not a beardless youth and, moreover, I am not a keen expert on everything that is done in the world, and your eruptions do not affect me! Temporary malfunctions in the new equipment, this is a centuries-old problem, and most of this problem was solved, not immediately but solved! How many RRC "Slava" passed with her problem "boob"? Or do you want to say that the Lumberjack was not a breakthrough technology for the Soviet Navy? How much "Nikolaev" suffered with his Fort? Yes, the same Polyment-Redoubt, how many feces were poured on it? And the new radar will be brought to mind .... the head ship, he has a lot of sores!

Quote: timokhin-aa

Upstairs there are corrupt officials ready to supply the troops with idle trash for the sake of filling their pockets

You, instead of posing as a naval Navalny, would sue the corrupt officials!

Quote: timokhin-aa

below - uryakalka like you

How cute!!! So the opponent's opinion based on his experience and more in-depth knowledge is definitely a gag, hindering you in the fight against the Great Morder? Sasha, do you know how the destruction of the Soviet Union began? Not from the economy! The destruction began with the army, yes yes, it was with the army. Attacks, insults, humiliation, accusations of the devil have turned the army into an amorphous structure ... now the same is happening and you, willingly or not consciously, are participating in this! I have already passed these copper pipes, so .. if you have evidence of corruption, sue, write to the FSB .. and the imitation of the fight against windmills only repels people from you.

[antivirus]

it's so good that we are not yet building an aircraft carrier - that's the dough and bile that would take in both A \ n and USC

[Fizik M]

Quote: Doccor18

The latest version of the super corvette.
The fleet is waiting for him.

the cost of its radar is close to the cost of the TOTAL head corvette
and radio correction on it was not even provided! - that is, "managers" who saw loot on it
https://neva.versia.ru/glava-peterburgskogo-oboronnogo-predpriyatiya-zaslon-okazalsya-krupnym-korrupcionerom
absolutely did not care about his real combat capability
the Navy was treated stupidly as a "cow that is milked"

at the moment, despite the failure of all the promised terms, ANY AIR TARGET could not shoot down this radar (to ensure the shooting down)
at the same time, from 20385, they "threw out" what became the salvation for "Reduta" on the previous corvettes - "Puma"

[WingCat]

There was a discussion about what the fleet needs. As a result, the army ordered 8 pieces. 20380, 2pcs. 20385, a couple more frigates, Varshavyanka and Lada. It is not clear how many minesweepers and finally allocated money for the modernization of pike 971. Taking into account 2x UDC, 2 landing, 2026 frigates and ash trees with boreas, laid down this year, for the first time it looks like the truth. Yes, and for modernization, they began to give up steamboats. So in 48, an update is coming, the main thing is that next year they do not forget to lay the frigates, because 2028 PU before XNUMX is unlikely to be included in the composition.

[Boris Chernikov]

the main thing is that as a result, IPCs were born on the basis of karakurt .. or the Cheetahs would start to buy again .. there is a suspicion that the MO is thinking about this

[Serg65]

Quote: Boris Chernikov

there is a suspicion that MO is thinking about this

Sumptuously!!!!

[Cyril G ...]

Though the air target was shot down by a corvette with a Zaslon radar? We are waiting, sir ..

[Senka naughty]

They will say that they shot down. Or they will say that they did not shoot down. Rather, they will roll an article on behalf of the Ministry of Defense. What will this change? The only one who can provide quality information is the test command. All this "news", about the head corvettes, the latest developments, like fortune telling on the coffee grounds. Loves - does not love, shot down - not shot down. There is a ship in service, what other questions can there be? I remember quite recently that they adopted an amendment to the law on not disclosing any information at all.

[Cyril G ...]

Quote: Senka Mad

I remember quite recently that they adopted an amendment to the law on not disclosing any information at all.

They did not accept, but the desire is there

[musorg]

However, it is unlikely to be handed over this year. So far they have passed what they should have passed in 2019.