Welrod Silent Gun

27
Probably, it will not be a secret to anyone that the war, despite all the negative aspects that it brings with it, is the most powerful catalyst in the development of science and technology. Naturally, the prioritization in such a situation is quite specific and, despite the fact that, in principle, all industries are developing, the military industry, including firearms, is developing the most. weapon. In addition to the very rapid modernization of those models that already exist, new ones appear, sometimes radically different not only in their design, but also in the specifics of their application from generally accepted samples. A striking example of this is the Welrod silent pistol, which lasted in service with the British army from the middle of World War II until the end of the twentieth century.

Welrod Silent GunAt the beginning of the fortieth year, the command of the British army was forced to reconsider its views on the conduct of hostilities. Now preference began to be given to sabotage operations, which showed much greater effectiveness than a frontal attack. But it is not enough just to change the views on the conduct of war, in addition to this, there was a need for equipment and weapons that would be suitable for performing certain tasks. If there were no special problems with the equipment, then there were actually no special weapons with which small detachments should be armed to conduct operations in enemy territory. In particular, for such operations, a completely silent weapon was required, which would not betray the shooter either by the operation of automation or, of course, by the sound of the shot itself. Already existing samples were immediately discarded, since even when equipped with silent firing devices, they were not completely silent. The arrow gave out the sound of the weapon mechanisms, and most of the non-self-loading samples were simply inconvenient for transportation or were capricious in adverse operating conditions. The creation of a completely silent weapon for the British army was entrusted to a design bureau known as the "ninth department". Giving preference to small dimensions and weight, it was decided to make an absolutely silent non-self-loading pistol.

It should be noted that the Welrod silent pistol is the final result of the development, the Model-1 pistol was created before it, which, due to certain flaws in the design, never gained distribution. So the most important difference between the two models was that the end result had a detachable handle, which was a regular magazine covered in rubber for a more comfortable hold. During transportation, the magazine handle was detached, and the weapon could be easily carried without creating absolutely no inconvenience. The weapon controls have also undergone changes, so if the Model-1 had a rather unusual trigger system (the trigger lever was on the left side of the weapon), then the Welrod became closer to the classic models. To be honest, Model-1 and Welrod differ only in the redesigned trigger mechanism and bolt handle, otherwise, up to the design of the silent firing device, the pistols are identical.

By itself, the Welrod pistol is a steel cylinder that splits into two parts. One of them is a silent shooting device, but about it a little later, for now, let's take a closer look at the gun itself. A barrel of a weapon is installed in the body-steel tube, while the barrel has rows of holes that are designed to remove powder gases into the first of the chambers of the silent firing device. This made it possible to significantly reduce both the dimensions of the pistol and increase the efficiency of reducing the sound of a shot, however, it had a negative effect on the speed of the bullet. On the back of the body tube is the bolt, which is a modernized version of the Mauser, so often used in rifles. By the way, if the Model-1 pistol used a bolt handle similar to rifle ones, then it was removed in the Welrod pistol, instead of it, there is a small rotary knob with notches on the back of the pistol. This made it possible not only to reduce the dimensions of the weapon, but also to make reloading more convenient for the shooter, in addition, now it became possible to use the weapon both with the right and left hand, which could not be said about the Model-1 - the shutter handle interfered. Reloading was quite simple and fast. After the shot, without removing the holding hand from the pistol handle, it was necessary to turn the bolt handle counterclockwise, pull it back, removing the spent cartridge case and cocking the trigger mechanism, and then push the bolt forward and turn already clockwise. With a certain skill, the shooter could fire at a fairly high pace, which, combined with almost complete silence, was a big plus for the weapon.

And everything would be great in this pistol if it were not for the silent shooting device. The fact is that, for the sake of higher efficiency, the designers sacrificed its resource, so one could not even dream of a durable silent weapon. However, the Welrod pistol's silent firing device did not lose its qualities for 15 shots, and this was most often enough to complete one operation. In addition, the PBS could be updated by the shooter himself, since its wear was due to the wear of the rubber gaskets inside the silent firing device, and given a fairly simple weapon design, replacing them did not take much time or effort. The Welrod silent firing device itself can be divided into two parts. One of them is a large chamber into which powder gases enter from the holes in the barrel, it is connected to the second part of the PBS using a metal washer with holes. The second part is divided into several chambers using metal washers and rubber gaskets. The most interesting thing is that there was no standard set of gaskets, they could alternate in a wide variety of sequences, perhaps the only constant point was the presence of rubber gaskets at the muzzle of the pistol and directly at the very exit from the silent firing device. As noted above, such a design was short-lived, for this reason, along with the pistol, the fighter also had a spare set of gaskets for PBS, which were most often already assembled in a certain sequence and mounted on a steel pin for ease of replacement.

Naturally, the gun itself is far from all that is of interest in a silent weapon, the ammunition that is used is also important. In this case, the designers did not reinvent the wheel and, saving state money, made their weapons in two versions - chambered for 7,65x17 and 9x19. True, there is usually a little confusion here. The fact is that initially the Welrod pistol was created chambered for 9x19, respectively, having received the designation Mk.I, and only after that did the Mk.II chambered for 7,65x17 cartridges appear. The pistols were put into service in the reverse order, which is why they are constantly confused. Outwardly, both models differ primarily in dimensions, in addition, the version for 9x19 cartridges has a safety bracket.

The Welrod Mk.I pistol weighs 1,5 kilograms and is 360 millimeters long. Its single-row magazine holds only 6 rounds of 9x19. The length of the "leaky" pistol barrel is 95 millimeters, while the bullet speed is 305 meters per second.

The Welrod Mk.II pistol has a more modest weight and dimensions. So its weight is 1,09 kilograms, with a length of 310 millimeters, the barrel length remains the same - 95 millimeters, the bullet of the 7,65x17 cartridge has a speed of 215 meters per second when it leaves the silent firing device, but the weapon magazine already holds 8 rounds. Despite the significantly lower efficiency of the ammunition used, which has already decreased due to a decrease in the speed of movement, this sample attracted more attention from officials, which is not surprising in view of its lower weight, dimensions and larger magazine capacity. However, practice has shown that this model is effective at a very short distance and already at a distance of 10 meters cannot guarantee a confident defeat of the enemy. It was also noteworthy that there were cases when a bullet fired from this pistol could not penetrate the hard Aryan forehead. This was the main reason for the adoption of an older model. Subsequently, it was slightly modernized, the sights, the window for ejecting spent cartridges, etc., changed, that is, the gun underwent cosmetic changes, after which the letter “A” was added to its name.

But these two models of pistols are far from all the useful that the designers of the 9th department could squeeze out of their development. On the basis of the second model, a single-shot silent firing device chambered for 7,65 millimeters was created - the Sleeve Gun. This device was the same Welrod pistol, but no longer had a magazine, and fire control was carried out by means of a swinging lever in the place where the front sight was located at the pistol. As conceived by the developers, this device was supposed to be mounted in the sleeve of the shooter's clothing, which, provided that it was used silently, made it an absolutely invisible weapon. The targets of this device were to be senior military officials of Nazi Germany. Officially, this shooting object was not adopted for service, nor is there any mention of its combat use, which can be trusted in view of the individual features of such weapons. The fact is that in order to reload the device, it was necessary to unscrew the bolt of the weapon, get a spent cartridge case, install a new cartridge and screw the bolt, which took a very long time. In addition, aimed shooting was out of the question, in view of the fact that the shooter literally shot at a glance, although with a certain amount of training, such shooting could well be of use. If you dream up a little and add a laser target designator to this device, then, of course, it would be much more widespread, but, unfortunately, at that time no one thought of making a compact flashlight with a reduced beam of light.

The use of Welrod pistols was not at all limited to the Second World War, they were successfully used after, in addition, these pistols attracted the attention of the armies of other countries. So the most famous fact of the use of this weapon is its use in the 70s in Laos, Cambodia, North Vietnam. This pistol also lit up in hostilities for control of the Falkland Islands. The last of the military operations where this weapon was officially used was Operation Desert Storm. And almost everywhere, these models of pistols were noted as one of the most reliable and trouble-free images of silent weapons, which is understandable by its structure to everyone, and its maintenance takes a few minutes.

Based on all of the above, it should be noted that sometimes the key to success for a weapon is its simplicity and high reliability in a variety of conditions. On the other hand, this rule has recently been violated. Designers create more and more complex devices, manufacturers produce them, and the end user has no choice but to put up with what he was given in his hands. There are already plenty of examples that a weapon operating under ideal conditions and undergoing a reliability test, in which every grain of sand that gets into it is calculated, in reality fails after every tenth shot due to the same sand or dirt. In principle, there is nothing wrong with the fact that many samples can only be used with perfect cleanliness, after all, they can be used both in urban areas and inside buildings. But if the weapon is planned to be used in a desert or swampy area, then it would be more reasonable to sacrifice its combat characteristics for the sake of greater reliability, because a shot, even if it misses, is in many situations much better than no shot at all.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    10 August 2012 10: 19
    Many thanks to the author for the article.
  2. +4
    10 August 2012 12: 33
    interesting, thanks for the article
    1. Odious
      +3
      10 August 2012 13: 29
      The article is certainly informative, but the cuttlefish pistol is rare.
  3. +4
    10 August 2012 16: 24
    The pistol is interesting. It is not clear why the designers opted for the Parabellum cartridge? Why didn't they use 45ACP? Indeed, in the DeLisle carbine teams, the British used the 45 ACP cartridge along with the standard Colt M1911 magazine. 45 ACP in the DeLisle carbine also has a muzzle velocity slightly below the speed of sound (approx. 320-330 m/s), but it has a large mass, which increases the stopping effect of the bullet due to the greater momentum. Bullet weight 9x19 mm Pair, depending on the type and manufacturer, ranges from 5 to 9 gr., Bullet 45 ACP-11-12 gr. If initially a 9x19 bullet has a higher speed than 45 ACP, then in silent weapons the bullet speed should be less than the speed of sound (to avoid the appearance of a Mach cone). And since the speed of both bullets in a silent weapon is the same, then the heavier bullet will have a higher momentum. From the course of physics, momentum \u45d mass * speed. In addition, due to the larger caliber, the XNUMX ACP bullet gives a larger wound channel diameter.
    1. +1
      12 August 2012 18: 32
      not only the speed of the bullet plays a role, but also the volume of powder gases that must be stopped. Accordingly, the volume of the silencer should be much larger, which will affect the mass of the pistol, and it is not small anyway.
  4. +2
    10 August 2012 16: 37
    here Russian gunsmiths brutally overtook the West, not some kind of pistol with a resource of 15 shots, but they release full-fledged automatons silent and flameless shooting. Unfortunately, this technology is available only to specialists, I would like mass weapons for domestic Marxists on this platform, because stealth saves lives not only for specialists. So it’s cheaper to do it (and thereby bring the good old SP-6: 3 back to life), slightly increase the resource and slightly increase the range, at least up to 500-550 m, and that’s all in principle, then not a single the super-duper-armored US marine will not cope with the Russian soldier, unless you are lucky
    1. evgen2124
      +2
      10 August 2012 16: 55
      agree!! even the US Marine Corps periodically purchases consignments of air force and ammunition for them! there was a conversation about the thunderstorm complex, but they did not agree on the number of trunks and prices !!
      1. +1
        3 February 2013 12: 48
        did you gentlemen from the VSS shoot or was it just like that in a stalker? yes, the weapon is not bad, but for some reason after 50-60 shots it refuses to cooperate, it is necessary to clean it, but in general it was not made for shooting on the battlefield at the hordes of the advancing enemy, but for special operations and shooting a maximum of 150-200 m, but about performance characteristics, if you want to say, then we have and f-1 fragments fly at 200 meters))))) but seriously, VSS and its brother and analogue of the AC have been and will be the second and not the first barrel, because a hundred even against AK that 7,62 that 5,45 is not a barrel serious and not entirely reliable
    2. DIMS
      0
      10 August 2012 17: 00
      And why does the "Marxman" need a silent weapon? He has rather the opposite task - to draw the attention of the soldiers of his unit to the detected target
      And for snipers, a silencer is not always good. Low range, low bullet energy.
      The fact is that the cartridge for silent shooting is subsonic. The sound of a shot consists of two components - the shot itself and the passage of the sound barrier by the bullet ..
      And there is already a silencer with an increased resource and a normal range. On a machine gun. The sound of the shot is heard well, but does not stun the machine gunner and neighbors. The management of the unit is improved.
      1. evgen2124
        0
        10 August 2012 17: 14
        they need him then to get close to the main goal, quietly destroying the guards !!!
        1. DIMS
          +3
          10 August 2012 17: 25
          Scouts can do this. They are now on a new staff in each battalion in a platoon. And they are armed with a whole line of silent weapons, starting from the NRS and ending with the VSK-VSS.
          The infantry still has slightly different functions.
          1. -1
            11 August 2012 11: 50
            guarding is not necessary, it is easier to defeat any enemy when he does not hear or see you. For a night sweep of NATO fortified areas, such machine guns are a guarantee of victory. There is a mass problem, but it can be solved. Although I know what's the matter - the Russian authorities expect to fight only against civilians, following the example of NATO, and therefore rely on a cheap, noisy, outdated AK, but they are greatly mistaken if they think they will always be friends with a bloc that has concentrated its main forces near the borders of Russia
      2. +1
        10 August 2012 17: 33
        Agree. In addition to a low-noise shooting device for a machine gun, a silencer for AKM was made even during the union.
        1. DIMS
          +1
          10 August 2012 17: 50
          So PBS is in service. They say there is also a 5.45 caliber, but I have never seen it. In addition, the troops also have a PB at the Makarov base, APSB.
          1. evgen2124
            0
            10 August 2012 17: 57
            there is under 5,45!! full-time on Aksu!! there, because of the short barrel, and so the speed of the bullet is less, and they also crushed it!
            1. DIMS
              0
              10 August 2012 18: 02
              No, then the old cases, by order of the GBshnikov, seemed to be done. Moreover, the machine itself was redone. I don't even know if they bought it.
              1. evgen2124
                +1
                10 August 2012 18: 28
                nothing has been changed there! I shot it! the sound of the shutter is audible and as if they are hitting a tin can! although from 50 meters you will not hear in the conditions of urban noise !! purchases were mainly for the Ministry of Internal Affairs in the same place and passed the test but did not pass! everything was mostly written off very quickly!
                1. DIMS
                  0
                  10 August 2012 18: 30
                  Never encountered
                  1. evgen2124
                    0
                    10 August 2012 19: 02
                    there are only a few of them left and those in training centers in warehouses !! they are very rare! you can say a rarity!
    3. 0
      10 August 2012 17: 35
      Sanchez, maybe it would be nice if the VSS and the like appeared in the infantry, but now imagine how much it will cost?
      1. DIMS
        +1
        10 August 2012 17: 51
        They were in regimental reconnaissance companies 10 years ago. In addition, there is a cheaper VSK
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. vylvyn
    +3
    10 August 2012 23: 44
    The idea is correct. Everything is fine. But an effective range of 10 meters is just about nothing. Inside buildings - still go.
    Since the British calculated that the effectiveness of special operations was higher than "head-on attacks", it was necessary to develop this direction and start with the creation of special ammunition and then weapons for it. And perhaps cars of the VSK and VSS level would have appeared first, not with us, but with them. In addition, this ammunition would most likely be cheaper than rifle ammunition, and weapons for it could be unified for both the army and special forces, with the only difference being that special forces would use silencers.
    It is a pity that ours did not reach this point during the Second World War. It is quite possible that today, instead of Kalash, weapons like VSK and VSS would flourish in the troops. How to know.
  7. Mitzhel
    +2
    12 August 2012 16: 01
    Sanches,
    Quote: Sanches
    here Russian gunsmiths brutally overtook the West, not some kind of pistol with a resource of 15 shots, but they produce full-fledged automatic machines of silent and FLAME-FREE shooting. Unfortunately, this technology is available only to specialists, I would like mass weapons for domestic Marxists on this platform, because stealth saves lives not only for specialists. So it’s cheaper to do it (and thereby bring the good old SP-6: 3 back to life), slightly increase the resource and slightly increase the range, at least up to 500-550 m, and that’s all in principle, then not a single the super-duper-armored US marine will not cope with the Russian soldier, unless you are lucky


    Overtaken? laughing Well, given that this pistol was developed during the Second World War, then of course ... this is a cruel overtaking with a margin of 70 years - did you read the article in full or just looked at the photos ?? The USSR only caught up and copied. The fact remains: it was England and the United States that were the first to supply their specialists with weapons with INTEGRATED silencers.

    for example, in addition to the unsuccessful Welrod pistol, British specialists during WWII had at least two more weapons with integrated silencers - the Sten Mk IIS PP and the De Lisle carbine





    after the war, the British developed a silenced PP based on Sterling, and the Americans widely used the Ruger pistol with an integrated silencer and versions of the MP5 PP during covert operations
    1. DIMS
      +1
      12 August 2012 16: 11
      Is there an integrated muffler in the first picture?
      And about the lag, in which country is a silent cartridge produced? I don’t even ask about a silent mortar, only we have it.
      1. Mitzhel
        +2
        12 August 2012 16: 23
        It's integrated! As for the silent cartridge, the West has the championship here too. Silent revolver QSPR with a cut-off of powder gases was released in the mid-60s in the United States during the Vietnam War. They armed the so-called "tunnel rats" - special forces specializing in the fight against partisans in the tunnels-cache of fortified areas.

        Is a silent mortar in service in the Russian Federation? There is no such thing in service ... some prototypes and prototypes - the plant is looking for current customers, even there are none.
        1. DIMS
          +2
          12 August 2012 16: 40
          Integrated into 4 centimeters of the barrel?


          The silent QSPR revolver was actually a canister, in addition, a silent cigarette case from Stechkin with a full-fledged bullet appeared back in the early 50s

          Silent mortar is not yet standing, but it is.
          1. Mitzhel
            +2
            12 August 2012 19: 23
            If we climb into the wilds of the cut-off of powder gases, then the patent for this invention was received back in 1902.

            http://www.google.com/patents?id=wC9DAAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&source=gbs_overv
            iew_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

            and what the piston pushes - a bullet or a pallet with buckshot is not important.
            A silent mortar is of course good for saboteurs or terrorists. But there are no orders, they did not take it into service, and it is undoubtedly destined to repeat the fate of all the other "unparalleled samples in a single copy."

            The photo shows one of the variants of the ordinary STEN Mk II.
            In the early integrally muffled models, the wall simply lengthened the barrel casing; in the later ones, the barrel was partially perforated in order to reduce the pressure and, consequently, the speed of the bullet to subsonic. The non-perforated barrel shroud served as a silencer.
            Pay attention to the actual barrel length of the same Vintorez

            1. DIMS
              +2
              12 August 2012 20: 54
              A patent is cool, but only the first sample was still made by Stechkin

              Silent mortar is good for mortars. When your firing position is discovered, this causes some inconvenience. And a silent mortar can only be detected with the help of a special radar that detects mines in flight

              The photo shows the only version of the second Stan, in your photo you can see that the muffler is "integrated" by about two centimeters. Take a look yourself. And look at your first photo
    2. +2
      13 August 2012 06: 57
      dear, but you remember BRAMIT, and he is still a pre-war development. and the question is - why a pistol, because a revolver would be simpler, more reliable and faster
    3. 0
      13 August 2012 08: 13
      Mitzhel Yesterday, 16: 01
      Russian VSS began to be actively used back in the 80s, this difference is not 70, but about 40 years, but it can also be discarded, given that Velrod was used until the end of the 60th century - after all, it means that more advanced models in the West could not supplant it about XNUMX years old, which means they were inferior to this pistol in some way
  8. Mitzhel
    +2
    12 August 2012 16: 11
    Sanches,
    [quote=sanches]

    this is in the Russian Federation, where the state loves and trusts its citizens very much, weapons with silencers are not available to anyone except specialists, but from "stupid Americans" in most states, ordinary citizens can safely buy silencers, including those integrated with weapons. Here are some for example...




    1. +1
      13 August 2012 08: 19
      good a very interesting addition to the article, perhaps even more significant than the article itself
  9. 0
    30 November 2017 10: 25
    In the games of the Sniper Elite series, this pistol is well shown.