Military Review

"New signal for the Kremlin": nuclear submarine Seawolf was placed on the routes of submarines of the Russian Navy

118

The US Navy has released a series of photographs of the Seawolf nuclear powered submarine in the waters near the Russian waters.


The Defense Department is reluctant to post images of the Seawolf-class submarines, as they specialize in reconnaissance operations. Therefore, according to the American edition of The War Zone, the published photographs are a new signal for the Kremlin, which was shown the capabilities of the US submarine forces in the region.

The Seawolf nuclear submarine was captured in Norwegian waters near the city of Tromsø.

The arrival of the Seawolf complements our already powerful submarine combat capabilities

- said Rear Admiral of the Navy Anthony Carullo, commander of the 8th submarine group.

Initially, Seawolf-class submarines were conceived as front-end strike submarines. 29 units were expected to be built. However, the end of the Cold War and the reduction in the number of the US Armed Forces led to the fact that only three ships left the stocks, which were entrusted with carrying out special operations. Moreover, they are perfectly adapted for work under ice, for example, in the Arctic.

Therefore, it is not surprising that Seawolf operates off the coast of northern Norway [...] close to the place where the Norwegian Sea borders the Barents Sea. This area [...] is known as the "bear gap" and is the usual route for Russian submarines heading to and from their bases in northwestern Russia.

- writes The War Zone.

According to the publication, the Kremlin is made clear that the routes of movement of the submarines of the Russian Navy are under close scrutiny by the American warships stationed in the north.
Photos used:
US Navy
118 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Victor_B
    Victor_B 26 August 2020 10: 13
    28
    That's news!
    Yes, their boats always grazed at the exits from our bases.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 26 August 2020 10: 19
      +2
      Seawolf complements our already powerful submarine combat capabilities
      Scares! Partner....
      1. Orange bigg
        Orange bigg 26 August 2020 10: 26
        -4
        "New signal for the Kremlin": nuclear submarine Seawolf was placed on the routes of submarines of the Russian Navy

        Yes, it scares. All 3 Seawolf nuclear submarines are on the way, and they cannot be on duty forever. They still need to be changed.
        1. Uncle lee
          Uncle lee 26 August 2020 10: 33
          15
          In addition to the Wolf, there are other nuclear submarines ... And the arrival of this strengthened the group ...
          1. Temples
            Temples 26 August 2020 21: 28
            -3
            It looks (American submarine) some kind of dumb.
        2. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 26 August 2020 10: 35
          -2
          "New signal for the Kremlin": nuclear submarine Seawolf was placed on the routes of submarines of the Russian Navy

          Is it like girls "with reduced social responsibility" in Leningradka? belay And our nuclear submarines proudly walk past them: it doesn't hurt, and we need it! yes
    2. Maz
      Maz 26 August 2020 11: 01
      0
      Cheap and angry, our answer to siafulwas and other wickedness ... Recently, Russia has made significant progress in creating unmanned ships for submarine warfare, writes Military Watch.
      The miniature robotic submarine "Cephalopod" developed in Russia is an effective means of protecting and destroying enemy ships. It combines stealth and maneuverability with profitability: an inexpensive drone can destroy ships whose cost is several orders of magnitude higher. Armed with "Cephalopod" light 324-mm torpedoes MTT - this caliber is usually used to combat submarines, from which we can conclude about the purpose of the drone. One of the possible tasks may be the escort of strategic submarines with nuclear missiles on alert. Attack submarines are now used for this purpose, but they have other tasks as well.

      Also, the robot will be very useful for the protection of naval bases and drilling rigs - including in inland seas such as the Baltic and Black. "Cephalopod" has a multi-blade propeller and several thrusters, giving it excellent maneuverability.
      1. paco.soto
        paco.soto 26 August 2020 13: 12
        +1
        Messages about the new development of the domestic military-industrial complex first appeared in 2015. From the information on government procurement it became known that the Rubin Central Design Bureau, one of the leading Russian developers of submarines, is creating an underwater robotic complex Cephalopod. The project cost is estimated at 7,9 billion rubles, other creators of underwater weapons are involved in the work on it: ©
        This is a project and unfortunately does not exist yet "in metal"
      2. Dikson
        Dikson 26 August 2020 15: 52
        +1
        It's good that they didn't call it "Hydrocephalus" ...
      3. Charik
        Charik 27 August 2020 20: 40
        0
        And this Cephalopod with all the tasks entrusted to him - one copes?
  2. Asad
    Asad 26 August 2020 10: 13
    +2
    And the command of the Russian fleet has no direct idea! Well, naive Chukchi boys, our command!
    1. rudolff
      rudolff 26 August 2020 10: 53
      12
      Judging by the shipbuilding program being implemented, it is the "naive Chukchi boys". Only this year have some reasonable thoughts appeared.
    2. iouris
      iouris 26 August 2020 11: 10
      +1
      Quote: ASAD
      And the command of the Russian fleet has no direct idea!

      You're right. The tragedy with the Kursk seems to indicate that one should "guess".
  3. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 26 August 2020 10: 13
    -5
    "New signal for the Kremlin": nuclear submarine Seawolf was placed on the routes of submarines of the Russian Navy
    You still heap a bunch of us under the fence and dream about what signal you sent. fool
    1. Pereira
      Pereira 26 August 2020 10: 48
      0
      So that's it. Just one submarine and immediately a radical turning point in the war.
      1. Vol4ara
        Vol4ara 26 August 2020 11: 14
        +6
        Quote: Pereira
        So that's it. Just one submarine and immediately a radical turning point in the war.

        During the cold wave, one submarine put eavesdropping equipment on the cable, first in the Okhotsk Sea, and then in the Barents Sea. And the Americans listened to all the negotiations of our admirals. Yes, one pl can make a turning point in a possible war
        1. Pereira
          Pereira 26 August 2020 11: 29
          -4
          Now I was scared.
      2. antivirus
        antivirus 26 August 2020 12: 33
        -2
        Have you not noticed the emerging tilt towards the next defeat of Russia in the next Cold War?
        here are those on ... it is clearly said - the signal was sent
        1. Pereira
          Pereira 26 August 2020 15: 04
          +6
          I noticed the lurch when they gave up the strategic initiative, stopping Novorosiya's attack on Mariupol. So the signal is more, the signal is less, it doesn't matter anymore.
          1. antivirus
            antivirus 26 August 2020 15: 35
            0
            I'm more interested in extraterritorial passage to Kaliningrad, not even Mariupol. Our art of persuading in our friendship with NATO and the EU is limp.
            but you can still jump ...
            1. Pereira
              Pereira 26 August 2020 16: 14
              +1
              Extraterritorial passage to Kaliningrad? It is unrealistic without war.
              1. antivirus
                antivirus 26 August 2020 16: 29
                -1
                the goodwill of the MSG can do a lot ... and did - we see the results of 30 years of the country's life. do Merkel and Duda have the same?
            2. boris epstein
              boris epstein 26 August 2020 17: 49
              +1
              It is impossible to convince someone of your friendship who was not and is not going to be friends from the beginning.
  4. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 26 August 2020 10: 14
    -3
    this is not a signal ... this is practically a challenge ... but a bolt will be found for every tricky nut ... Russia has low-noise submarines and anti-submarine weapons ... which is time to train at a real facility ... and Seawolf is right here in theme
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 26 August 2020 10: 28
      +8
      Quote: silberwolf88
      Russia has low-noise submarines and anti-submarine weapons ... which is time to practice at a real facility ...

      The only ship that could try to "compete" with the Seawulf is the Kazan, but it has not yet entered the fleet. Purely theoretically, one could try to use the diesel-electric submarine "St. Petersburg", but she EMNIP is still in limited operation. And other anti-submarine weapons are ... well, such a thing.
      1. Volder
        Volder 26 August 2020 19: 38
        -4
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        The only ship that could try to "compete" with the Seawulf is the Kazan,
        ANY Russian submarine can resist American submarines, because any of them has hydroacoustic equipment and anti-submarine torpedoes.
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        And other anti-submarine weapons are ... well, such a thing.
        Biased underestimation of Russian anti-submarine weapons will play a cruel joke on the enemy. In addition, the Russian air defense knows how to shoot down Harpoons and Tomahawks perfectly, so this is not a threat. But Seawulf or a similar nuclear submarine will reveal itself after the start of the missile launch. Will not go away safe and sound ...
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 27 August 2020 07: 15
          +6
          Quote: Volder
          ANY Russian submarine can resist American submarines, because any of them has hydroacoustic equipment and anti-submarine torpedoes.

          Yes Yes. Any first-rate athlete can oppose the world boxing champion - he also has hands and a head! wassat
          Quote: Volder
          Biased underestimation of Russian anti-submarine weapons will play a cruel joke on the enemy.

          They do not underestimate our PLO and work very seriously - that is why we are losing to them now with a devastating score.
          From February 11 to August 13, 2014, the New Hampshire submarine unhindered the entire strategic containment of the Northern Fleet in the Barents Sea.
          For reasons of confidentiality, I don’t have the right to reveal the seriousness of the issue of covering the situation at least near the points of deployment of our missile submarines, but I consider it necessary to do so, as my reports to the military-industrial complex and the General Staff are not accepted.
          Sergei Zhandarov, Rear Admiral

          Quote: Volder
          In addition, the Russian air defense knows how to shoot down Harpoons and Tomahawks perfectly, so this is a so-so threat

          You just don't understand what you are writing about. Shooting down a group of subsonic low-flying missiles is an extremely difficult aerobatics exercise.
          Quote: Volder
          But Seawulf or a similar nuclear submarine will reveal itself after the start of the missile launch. Will not go away safe and sound ...

          Firstly, the main target of the American submarines is our SSBNs. They are not fired at with rockets. Secondly, American submariners, in any case, prefer torpedoes to missiles - they have an advantage in detection range and excellent long-range torpedoes. Thirdly, even having found the missile launch area, it is very difficult to destroy the MAPL with our means.
          1. Volder
            Volder 27 August 2020 10: 20
            -5
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            Any first-rate athlete can oppose the world boxing champion - he also has hands and a head!
            Who made American submarines the world champions in anti-submarine defense, capable of repelling the attack of enemy torpedoes without any problems? Only Russian submarines have recently begun to equip anti-torpedoes. There are no foreign analogues.
            They do not underestimate our PLO and work very seriously - that is why we are losing to them now with a devastating score.
            Who is the judge here again ?? This is your opinion. I have a different opinion ...
            From February 11 to August 13, 2014, the New Hampshire submarine unimpeded unimpeded on all activities for the strategic containment of the Northern Fleet in the Barents Sea. ... My reports in the military-industrial complex and the General Staff were not accepted.
            Sergei Zhandarov, Rear Admiral
            The retired retired pensioner, who has long been out of business and clearly does not have classified information, begins to unfoundedly frighten the public and the General Staff. Apparently, the American naval generals personally report to him about the situation at sea. Unsurprisingly, the crazy pensioner was ignored.
            Shooting down a group of subsonic low-flying missiles is an extremely difficult aerobatics exercise.
            On land, Russia has the most efficient, layered air defense system. Shooting down subsonic anti-ship missiles is NOT aerobatics. Moreover, when it comes to Tomahawks.
            Thirdly, even having found the missile launch area, it is very difficult to destroy the MAPL with our means.
            It is not easy for the Americans to find our submarines either.
            1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
              Andrei from Chelyabinsk 27 August 2020 10: 48
              +5
              Quote: Volder
              Who made American submarines the world champions in anti-submarine defense, capable of repelling the attack of enemy torpedoes without any problems?

              You have now completely in vain combined two concepts of "anti-submarine defense" and "to repel the attack of enemy torpedoes without any problems."
              First. The Americans are building their defenses to NOT ALLOW a torpedo attack. It's turning out pretty well - the combination of their GAC capabilities and stealth results in their Sivulfs and Virginias detecting our submarines before ours detecting them. An exception (possibly) is the newest submarines such as Borey A and Ash M. New Warsaw women 636.3 - unknown, but more likely not than yes.
              That is, all other things being equal, our submariners will be attacked before they spot the enemy.
              Second. In terms of countering torpedo weapons, the Americans are betting on simulator traps, and this is a very effective solution from the bulk of the torpedoes with which our submarines are armed. An exception (possibly!) Is our newest torpedoes, but they, again, are not even on all Borei.
              Quote: Volder
              Only Russian submarines have recently begun to equip anti-torpedoes.

              They have not yet become, and what there is is focused on intercepting old modifications. That is, the effectiveness of the same Fins against modern torpedoes has not been tested in practice.
              Quote: Volder
              Who is the judge here again ?? This is your opinion. I have a different opinion ...

              The question is, what is it based on you?
              Quote: Volder
              The retired retired pensioner, who has long been out of business and clearly does not have classified information, begins to unfoundedly frighten the public and the General Staff. Apparently, the American naval generals personally report to him about the situation at sea. Unsurprisingly, the crazy pensioner was ignored.

              Well what can I say? On the one hand - the replicas of our own submariners, whose articles on torpedoes no one can refute so much, the work of the same A. Semenov (non-tradition) - a former anti-submarine, finally - official information that on the latest modifications of Pike -B "we are just CLOSING to some of the capabilities of the 4th generation nuclear submarine ... And much more.
              What do you have?
              Quote: Volder
              On land, Russia has the most efficient, layered air defense system.

              This is so.
              Quote: Volder
              Shooting down subsonic anti-ship missiles is NOT aerobatics. Moreover, when it comes to Tomahawks.

              Exactly what is the highest, and any air defense officer will explain this to you.
              You just have a shift in concepts. It seems to you that if our air defense systems are able to do this, then this is "lightness." In fact, yes, our ground-based air defense is really the best, but even for him, the destruction of cruise missiles is a very difficult task on the verge of a foul. That is why the USSR, which also had the world's best ground-based air defense system, did not rely on it, but relied on the construction of a Navy capable of destroying CD carriers before launch.
              If this will console you, our friends from abroad with ground air defense are much worse.
            2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
              Andrei from Chelyabinsk 27 August 2020 10: 50
              +3
              Quote: Volder
              It is not easy for the Americans to find our submarines either.

              Nevertheless, very often the crews of our SSBNs, imitating an exit to the prelaunch position, hear the opening covers of the torpedo tubes atomarin "sworn friends"
              1. Volder
                Volder 27 August 2020 12: 04
                -2
                Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                Nevertheless, very often the crews of our SSBNs, imitating an exit to the prelaunch position, hear the opening covers of the torpedo tubes atomarin "sworn friends"
                What are the openable covers ?? The covers are opened exclusively for attack, or during tests, or during exercises, in other cases, the launch of torpedoes is simulated electronically without opening the covers. Who told you this anecdote? :)
                1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                  Andrei from Chelyabinsk 27 August 2020 12: 17
                  +3
                  Quote: Volder
                  The covers are opened exclusively for attack, or for tests, or exercises,

                  In this case, these are teachings and are
                  Quote: Volder
                  Who told you this anecdote? :)

                  Dim, where did we drink with you for brooder?
                2. SovAr238A
                  SovAr238A 27 August 2020 20: 04
                  +2
                  Quote: Volder
                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  Nevertheless, very often the crews of our SSBNs, imitating an exit to the prelaunch position, hear the opening covers of the torpedo tubes atomarin "sworn friends"
                  What are the openable covers ?? The covers are opened exclusively for attack, or during tests, or during exercises, in other cases, the launch of torpedoes is simulated electronically without opening the covers. Who told you this anecdote? :)

                  Opening hatches is one way to show presence ..
                  Do not simulate the launch of torpedoes, not with electronic death rays ...
                  And provided that the difference in low-noise travel is two or even four times (and for the same Seawulf it is low-noise up to 20 knots), then there is no danger for the American hunter in opening the hatches ... He has time to change position at any moment
                3. Fizik M
                  Fizik M 29 August 2020 12: 44
                  +2
                  Quote: Volder
                  What are the openable covers ?? The covers are opened exclusively for attack, or during tests, or during exercises, in other cases, the launch of torpedoes is simulated electronically without opening the covers. Who told you this anecdote? :)

                  monsieur, keep YOUR wet fantasies to yourself
                  they have nothing to do with reality
                  ABSOLUTELY
            3. Charik
              Charik 27 August 2020 20: 49
              +1
              And then the land-Siful hunter on the submarine with a bk of 40 sausages - if you do not take the missiles, then it's just horror that he can do with his MK-48? Mod.
            4. stels_07
              stels_07 28 August 2020 08: 16
              0
              Anyone will understand the state of our economy, and therefore the fleet
            5. Fizik M
              Fizik M 29 August 2020 12: 41
              +3
              Quote: Volder
              Who made American submarines the world champions in anti-submarine defense, capable of repelling the attack of enemy torpedoes without any problems? Only Russian submarines have recently begun to equip anti-torpedoes. There are no foreign analogues.

              they have enough SGPD
              against torpedoes of their opponents, they are quite effective
              but we are against 48-7, and we only have to hope for AT
              WHICH IS NOT ON PL
              and the Americans will bring ATT in the very near future (they have already changed the contractors) and they will be in BC BEFORE than our "FINS"
            6. Fizik M
              Fizik M 29 August 2020 12: 43
              +2
              Quote: Volder
              Sergei Zhandarov, Rear Admiral
              The retired retired pensioner, who has long been out of business and clearly does not have classified information, begins to unfoundedly frighten the public and the General Staff. Apparently, the American naval generals personally report to him about the situation at sea. Unsurprisingly, the crazy pensioner was ignored.

              4 years ago (when he wrote this), this personage opened the doors to the General Staff and the Main Command of the Navy
          2. oldbuddy
            oldbuddy 28 August 2020 03: 49
            0
            Sergey Zhandarov, Rear Admiral of the Reserve, the source is extremely unreliable
            - in stock since 2009.
            - served in Kamchatka
            - Since 2009, the representative of JSC "Concern" Morskoe
            underwater weapon "Gidropribor" in Moscow - ie lobbyist of Gidropribor products
            1. Fizik M
              Fizik M 29 August 2020 12: 47
              +3
              Quote: oldbuddy
              Sergey Zhandarov, Rear Admiral of the Reserve, the source is extremely unreliable
              - in stock since 2009.
              - served in Kamchatka
              - Since 2009, the representative of JSC "Concern" Morskoe
              underwater weapon "Gidropribor" in Moscow - ie lobbyist of Gidropribor products

              until the end of 2015 he was "in the subject" (and the doors to the General Staff and the Main Command of the Navy "opened with his feet")
              but specifically for this episode, he LIES
              why did we know about "N-X" - because her "BROOKED" wink
              the Navy has a real priest with PLO, but in the specific case with the "N-X" everything was "not so bad"
        2. Charik
          Charik 27 August 2020 20: 45
          +1
          You have Siful against diesel-electric submarines uses Axes and Harpoons- wassat
        3. Fizik M
          Fizik M 29 August 2020 12: 39
          +3
          Quote: Volder
          ANY Russian submarine can resist American submarines, because any of them has hydroacoustic equipment and anti-submarine torpedoes.

          fool
          Quote: Volder
          Biased underestimation of Russian anti-submarine weapons

          Monsieur (from "Murzilka"), I will upset YOU - THEY ARE NOT HERE
          in the sense of really combat-capable
      2. Fizik M
        Fizik M 29 August 2020 12: 38
        +3
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        The only ship that could try to "compete" with "Seawulf" is "Kazan"

        THAN?
        "Physicists" and "Modul"?
        it's not funny, but very sad ...
        "Physicist-1" WOULD look worthy (if it were not for an asshole with remote control) against the background of Mk48mod6, but since DECEMBER 2006 (!) The USS PLA was received in the BC Mk48mod7, against the background of which "Physicist-1" looks very pale.
        The only plus - "went" "Answer", but there "there are nuances"
  5. rocket757
    rocket757 26 August 2020 10: 14
    +5
    The US Navy has released a series of photographs of the Seawolf nuclear powered submarine in the waters near the Russian waters.

    That is why we need an ocean-going fleet, ships, Schaub to cover, to cut off such "concerned partners" !!!
    If / when the fleet is harmoniously assembled, everything will become clearer, and the word PARTNERS will get real content, and not the fu u igna that it has now!
  6. BAI
    BAI 26 August 2020 10: 18
    +1
    the published photographs are a new signal for the Kremlin

    How many signaling devices are available. USA, Sweden, etc. And everyone signals without remembering themselves.
  7. Sidor Amenpodestovich
    Sidor Amenpodestovich 26 August 2020 10: 19
    +9
    Today is International Signal Day or what? The Swedes, over there, have signaled, now these ... I wonder who will pick up the baton.
  8. Runoway
    Runoway 26 August 2020 10: 28
    +3
    What you boast about, without that you will remain

    That would have sunk, for "technical reasons"
  9. Andrea
    Andrea 26 August 2020 10: 29
    -2
    And we, of course, neither sleep nor spirit that the Yankees are watching us.
    You might think they have no buoys there, well, there will be another one ... with a motor.
    Every cloud has a silver lining, he will train on someone in real conditions.
    1. SovAr238A
      SovAr238A 27 August 2020 20: 06
      +1
      Quote: Andrea
      And we, of course, neither sleep nor spirit that the Yankees are watching us.
      You might think they have no buoys there, well, there will be another one ... with a motor.
      Every cloud has a silver lining, he will train on someone in real conditions.

      In the overwhelming majority, it was neither sleep nor spirit ...
      Only now, in 99% of cases, collisions are always near our bases or BS areas, and almost always they catch up with us ...

      Which means they are always on our tail ...
    2. Charik
      Charik 27 August 2020 20: 54
      0
      who should train? the only Ash, so his eyes are 100%
  10. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 26 August 2020 10: 33
    -1
    The arrival of the Seawolf complements our already powerful submarine combat capabilities
    They would not burst from the excess of pumped up forces.
    the published photos are a new signal for the Kremlin
    The State Department is about to introduce a new position - a signalman who will semaphore the Kremlin about the received signals of containment. Continuous signals for Russia from all sides and from all NATO countries, including those who need to look for on the map with a magnifying glass.
    1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
      Sidor Amenpodestovich 26 August 2020 10: 41
      -1
      Yes, they can already form signal troops.
      Continuous signals for Russia from all sides and from all NATO countries, including those who need to look for on the map with a magnifying glass.

      And also in front of and behind the magnifying glass.
    2. stels_07
      stels_07 28 August 2020 08: 19
      -1
      This is not a verbal signal
  11. Cyril G ...
    Cyril G ... 26 August 2020 10: 41
    0
    According to the publication, the Kremlin is made clear that the routes of movement of the submarines of the Russian Navy are under close scrutiny by the American warships stationed in the north.


    Affiget, This is news! This has never happened, and now again, again !!!
  12. Victorio
    Victorio 26 August 2020 10: 41
    -1
    What is it about the Anglo-Saxons: a kind of manic syndrome for domination, a phobia, or just a business?
  13. KOLORADO73
    KOLORADO73 26 August 2020 10: 42
    -14 qualifying.
    The United States has a large fleet of Virginia nuclear submarines, plus there are still British Astyutes! And now the mighty Seawulf has been added to them! So the Ryusans fear and tremble! NATO is attacking!
    1. bar
      bar 26 August 2020 11: 11
      0
      Katz again offers to give up?
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 26 August 2020 11: 32
        +1
        Quote: bar
        Katz again offers to give up?

        No, it is Rabinovich who says that he has returned. yes fellow
      2. Charik
        Charik 28 August 2020 08: 36
        0
        Rather, Mykola matured with the appearance of the us apl in norway
    2. Volder
      Volder 26 August 2020 19: 52
      -2
      Quote: KOLORADO73
      The US has a large fleet of Virginia nuclear submarines,
      Yeah, with peeling rubber outer skin, which eliminates stealth. You probably think that the United States will direct its entire submarine fleet against Russia, exposing other directions in different parts of the world ...
      Quote: KOLORADO73
      So the Ryusans fear and tremble! NATO is attacking!
      Yeah, the Russians cannot attack, and NATO members need not be afraid at all. Of course, you have never heard of such a concept as "unacceptable damage" for a superior enemy ...
      1. SovAr238A
        SovAr238A 27 August 2020 20: 20
        +2
        Quote: Volder
        Quote: KOLORADO73
        The US has a large fleet of Virginia nuclear submarines,
        Yeah, with peeling rubber outer skin, which eliminates stealth. You probably think that the United States will direct its entire submarine fleet against Russia, exposing other directions in different parts of the world ...
        Quote: KOLORADO73
        So the Ryusans fear and tremble! NATO is attacking!
        Yeah, the Russians cannot attack, and NATO members need not be afraid at all. Of course, you have never heard of such a concept as "unacceptable damage" for a superior enemy ...

        That is, you have never seen our boats with peeled rubber? I understand correctly?

        Peeling of rubber is the result of tests at the maximum immersion depth or at the maximum speed ...
        Get the materiel first ...


        Will send easily and naturally about 50 nuclear submarines ...
        In the event of a clash with the Russian Federation in the European theater of operations, there is no need to guard Australia or the Strait of Malacca, and even more so to patrol the coast of Panama, guarding the channel.
        Knowing that ours are not there in principle, and if they are, then figs with them ... Let them be there ...
        And do not forget about a dozen nuclear submarines of France and England, which will get involved in the war anyway.
        And almost 40 excellent fuel oils, together with the VNEU of NATO countries, Sweden and Finland, which will perfectly block all exits and entrances to the Atlantic.

        Our attacking fleet with 5 living nuclear submarines, against 60 enemy submarines, is a force ... But for a moron ..
        For even if we turn on the mode of non-scientific fiction ... our Kazan surpasses any enemy nuclear submarine by 20 times, then the complete quantitative and qualitative superiority of PLO, RTR, AWACS aviation, fighter aircraft among NATO countries in the world ocean, incl. and in the North Atlantic, does not give a chance even for unscientific fiction not one ...
        Just zero ...

        It hurts to write and talk about it.
        But this is a fact.

        They are superior to us in everything.
        Both quantity and quality.
        1. Fizik M
          Fizik M 29 August 2020 12: 48
          +4
          Quote: SovAr238A
          Peeling of rubber is the result of tests at the maximum immersion depth or at the maximum speed ...

          I strongly suspect that if our submarines will walk at the transitions like the Americans (long 20-30 knots), then they will "climb" no less
  14. Thrifty
    Thrifty 26 August 2020 10: 46
    -5
    And the option that we, too, under the nose of the United States will additionally place a couple of our submarines, does not suit anyone from the pantygon in the United States and the head? ??
  15. Egoza
    Egoza 26 August 2020 10: 52
    0
    Ohameli to the edge! But there is a trap for every wolf!
  16. HAM
    HAM 26 August 2020 10: 53
    0
    Mlyn, everyone who is not lazy sends SIGNALS, we do not have time to receive ..... where can we get so many radio operators, for all the "signals"? .....
  17. KOLORADO73
    KOLORADO73 26 August 2020 10: 55
    -14 qualifying.
    The Seawulf nuclear submarine in its attack version can carry up to 50 Tomahawk cruise missiles, the flight range of which is 2500 km! Sea wolves can destroy the entire Russei Sefer fleet in one go!
    Is the Russian Defense Ministry still functioning or is it all already?
    1. Fmax
      Fmax 26 August 2020 11: 42
      +2
      tomahawks on land work ...
    2. Volder
      Volder 26 August 2020 20: 00
      0
      Quote: KOLORADO73
      The Seawulf nuclear submarine in its attack version can carry up to 50 Tomahawk cruise missiles, the flight range of which is 2500 km! Sea wolves can destroy the entire Russei Sefer fleet in one go!
      To an illiterate comrade who does not know how the word "Russia" is spelled, I would like to inform you that the Northern Fleet of the Russian Federation is NOT based on land. In a threatened war period, our fleet will be put out to sea, so the Tomahawks will be useless.
      1. Alex 2020
        Alex 2020 27 August 2020 10: 02
        -1
        Are there enough tugs for withdrawal?
        1. Volder
          Volder 27 August 2020 11: 56
          0
          Quote: Alex 2020
          Are there enough tugs for withdrawal?
          Enough.
          1. val43
            val43 27 August 2020 13: 35
            0
            Blatant illiteracy and equally blatant aplomb. Tell me, have you ever been to the naval base?
          2. SovAr238A
            SovAr238A 27 August 2020 20: 23
            -1
            Quote: Volder
            Quote: Alex 2020
            Are there enough tugs for withdrawal?
            Enough.

            Come on?
            Either we build tugs with terrible force, because there is not enough even for peacetime ...
      2. val43
        val43 27 August 2020 11: 06
        -1
        And where will he return?
        1. Volder
          Volder 27 August 2020 11: 59
          0
          Quote: val43
          And where will he return?
          The same place where he left. NATO members will not waste rockets on empty piers, piers and bays, for they are not fools.
          1. val43
            val43 27 August 2020 13: 05
            -1
            Precisely because they will not be fools! The coastal infrastructure is not limited to piers, marinas and bays. This is a very bold target. In addition, covering the base would mean a one-way trip for the boats. Even for survivors.
          2. SovAr238A
            SovAr238A 27 August 2020 20: 32
            +3
            Quote: Volder
            Quote: val43
            And where will he return?
            The same place where he left. NATO members will not waste rockets on empty piers, piers and bays, for they are not fools.

            Those are just fools who think that missiles are only for hitting "dangerous targets" ...
            Modern war tendencies are in the destruction of the supporting infrastructure ...
            Why destroy 10 tanks when you can destroy 2 fuel tankers with the same result ...
            Why destroy 50 aircraft when you can destroy fuel terminals both at the airbase itself and all the surrounding commercial terminals ..
            Moreover, there are a dozen power system substations around ...
            And reserves, even military ones, are not stored in a duck, but at terminals accessible for missiles ...

            The destruction of the infrastructure of naval bases gives a 100% guarantee that the conflict will not continue ...
            Even without nuclear strikes.


            I'll tell you even more, the destruction of only 12 distribution centers of food chains such as Magnet, Pyaterochka will lead to total hunger among a population of 10 million people in 5 days ...
            And if we add to this the destruction of the power system and bridges in the area, then we will raise our legs very quickly ...

            For no one is involved in food security in our country ...
    3. Charik
      Charik 27 August 2020 20: 59
      0
      or 50 missiles or 50 torpedoes - who will go on a campaign on a submarine without torpedoes? -only a cardboard fool like you
  18. APASUS
    APASUS 26 August 2020 10: 56
    +2
    There is not even anything to catch, now they will begin to catch our submarines in the Norwegian fjords. They will not catch it, but the sediment will remain ..................
  19. KOLORADO73
    KOLORADO73 26 August 2020 10: 56
    -15 qualifying.
    Sea wolves represent the incredible power of the North Atlantic Alliance!
    1. bar
      bar 26 August 2020 11: 12
      +3
      Hamster, breathe out already laughing
    2. Crash
      Crash 26 August 2020 14: 48
      0
      Sea wolves represent the incredible power of the North Atlantic Alliance!

      Hydrographer, is that you? lol
  20. rusich
    rusich 26 August 2020 11: 00
    0
    This is the second signalman for today. How many more will there be during the day laughing
  21. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 26 August 2020 11: 01
    0
    Ours need to designate themselves in California and Florida. Or take a photo against the backdrop of the Statue of Liberty from the back of it. drinks
    1. rudolff
      rudolff 26 August 2020 11: 14
      +7
      Quite a sensible thought, excluding the Statue of Liberty. Previously, they did it. The appearance of one SSNS in the immediate vicinity of the American coast makes the Americans withdraw a significant part of the ASW forces from other regions. Now there are practically no such disturbing campaigns, the Americans relaxed, they got the opportunity to build up a grouping directly off our coast.
      1. Fizik M
        Fizik M 29 August 2020 12: 51
        +2
        Quote: rudolff
        Quite a sensible thought, excluding the Statue of Liberty. Previously, they did it. The appearance of one SSNS in the immediate vicinity of the American coast makes the Americans withdraw a significant part of the ASW forces from other regions. Now there are practically no such disturbing campaigns, the Americans relaxed, they got the opportunity to build up a grouping directly off our coast.

        see history
        Dudko's actions at Bangor "had consequences"
        including legally (Reagan's increase in the US Terrorism) and operational ("Kamchatka Pearl Harbor" 1982)
        after which there was a "response" by Butakov (not as successful as that of Dudko, but "beyond the bounds")
        and then the exchange of very tough "shares" from our side and the United States to the Pacific Fleet in the 80s (in the north there was no such severity of confrontation)
    2. val43
      val43 27 August 2020 11: 07
      0
      What, let me ask?
      1. Fizik M
        Fizik M 29 August 2020 12: 52
        +2
        Quote: val43
        What, let me ask?

        wrong question
        for correct - WHY?!?!
  22. bar
    bar 26 August 2020 11: 09
    +1
    Now they carry signals to the nuclear submarine? Are there not enough aircraft carriers?
  23. Olddetractor
    Olddetractor 26 August 2020 11: 22
    -1
    For some reason, the banks of the Raseya are not visible ... The foe are lying. All to lie to them, but to brag. Now the Swedish minister from the islands signals, then these wolves. Know their deeds are bad
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. Prisoner
    Prisoner 26 August 2020 11: 27
    -2
    laughing The signal is not fresh. Sniffy.
  26. Angelo Provolone
    Angelo Provolone 26 August 2020 11: 46
    -3
    and that the ass was not shown in the photo? Send, send signals like that ...
  27. Tektor
    Tektor 26 August 2020 12: 02
    -4
    Actually, the probability of getting one submarine into another on the high seas is close to zero. Only knowing in advance or from fresh intelligence data, the location of the opponent can be tailored. Therefore, we need a lighting system for the underwater environment in order to promptly inform their submarines. Well, for the Sivulfs, we have an unmanned Cephalopod: it can be aimed at a target remotely.
    1. val43
      val43 27 August 2020 11: 09
      -1
      And how many of these wunderwatches have been adopted?
      1. Tektor
        Tektor 27 August 2020 11: 21
        0
        There is at least one Cephalopod that completes trials.

        The Cephalopod program became known back in 2015. In fact, it is an unmanned nuclear submarine armed with light compact thermal torpedoes (MTTs) of 324 mm caliber. "Cephalopod" will search and destroy enemy submarines equipped with nuclear power plants.
        1. val43
          val43 27 August 2020 11: 33
          +1
          What: factory, running, government? And there, improvements based on the test results are possible improvements ... And they were needed not even yesterday, but the day before yesterday, and not in a single copy. And Seawulf is here.
    2. SovAr238A
      SovAr238A 27 August 2020 20: 39
      0
      [quote = Tektor] Actually, there is a near zero chance of getting one submarine into another on the high seas. / quote]
      Tell that to hundreds of clashes between submarines ...
      From the latter, almost touching the sides between the French and British SSBNs ...
      A few years ago...
    3. Fizik M
      Fizik M 29 August 2020 12: 53
      +3
      Quote: Tektor
      Well, for the Sivulfs, we have an unmanned Cephalopod: it can be aimed at a target remotely.

      lol
      don't bullshit hurt her
      in fact, we only have temple
  28. Bez 310
    Bez 310 26 August 2020 12: 21
    -1
    The number of cheerful patriotic
    comments indicating a huge supply of
    special underwater hats for throwing the enemy.
    1. Charik
      Charik 27 August 2020 21: 03
      0
      Rubber caps-to pull on Siful's nose-so as not to shoot
    2. Fizik M
      Fizik M 29 August 2020 12: 55
      +3
      Quote: Bez 310
      The number of cheerful patriotic
      comments indicating a huge supply of
      special underwater hats for throwing the enemy.

      Yesterday's communication at the "Army" at the stand of the Navy in one of the former VIPs from MA (and it happened in the presence of TASS journalists), people (already a functionary in the defense industry in a "fat" position) optimized "bloomed and groin" wassat
      when his "optimism" was "slightly undermined" with facts, he rushed to call and inquire about me
      1. Bez 310
        Bez 310 29 August 2020 18: 55
        +1
        But I am not amazed for a long time by the "optimism" of our
        leaders of all ranks. These are the general rules
        behavior in their areas - to express confidence in our
        bright tomorrow, not forgetting about all the good today.
        And we have nothing bad ...
  29. Pavel57
    Pavel57 26 August 2020 12: 42
    0
    Quote: antivirus
    clearly said - the signal was sent

    We must send them something too.
    1. SovAr238A
      SovAr238A 27 August 2020 20: 40
      0
      Hat ... Send ...
      By telegraph.
      Internet.
      This is especially fashionable on Topvar now ...
  30. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 26 August 2020 13: 12
    +2
    Why go far. Maryata appeared at the "fence" there is a chance to see our nuclear submarine on the surface. It often happened on fishermen. And it also happened, the nuclear submarine left the base to pass close to us for some time, and then dive and only saw her. Ours will still find a hole in their vaunted defense. The question is how to find this hole. Everything that we can walk on can be counted on our fingers.
    1. NordUral
      NordUral 27 August 2020 22: 13
      -1
      Everything that walks unas can be counted on the fingers.
      Right! I watched the parade on the day of the Navy, I wanted to cry
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 27 August 2020 22: 22
        0
        Oh, I remember 86, when the Americans bombed Syria. For half a day, the Northern Fleet went out to sea in reserve positions, which was not there, we had everything. 12 hours watched and was tortured to count, since it was a polar day. The last ship was dragged out into the sea. And only then they let us into the Kola Bay. Maybe everything will work out. hi
  31. vgdsgj
    vgdsgj 26 August 2020 15: 35
    +1
    Quote: Maz
    Cheap and angry, our answer to siafulwas and other wickedness ... Recently, Russia has made significant progress in creating unmanned ships for submarine warfare, writes Military Watch.
    The miniature robotic submarine "Cephalopod" developed in Russia is an effective means of protecting and destroying enemy ships. It combines stealth and maneuverability with profitability: an inexpensive drone can destroy ships whose cost is several orders of magnitude higher. Armed with "Cephalopod" light 324-mm torpedoes MTT - this caliber is usually used to combat submarines, from which we can conclude about the purpose of the drone. One of the possible tasks may be the escort of strategic submarines with nuclear missiles on alert. Attack submarines are now used for this purpose, but they have other tasks as well.

    Also, the robot will be very useful for the protection of naval bases and drilling rigs - including in inland seas such as the Baltic and Black. "Cephalopod" has a multi-blade propeller and several thrusters, giving it excellent maneuverability.

    And this is their answer
    1. MMX
      MMX 26 August 2020 16: 09
      +2
      Rather the opposite.
  32. Tneburashka
    Tneburashka 26 August 2020 15: 52
    0
    Right now, the whole fleet will probably be happy with him, because it’s definitely him and you need to remove all the parameters from him
  33. Vladimir SHajkin
    Vladimir SHajkin 26 August 2020 16: 20
    0
    Well my magnanimity will be merciless
  34. Turist1996
    Turist1996 27 August 2020 07: 34
    +1
    This is news, so news! As if they hadn't been there before ?!
    And this stupid little phrase: "signal for the Kremlin" .. Signalers, e-mine!
  35. Alex 2020
    Alex 2020 27 August 2020 09: 55
    +1
    There is nothing new and surprising in this. In our fleet there are no longer ships and vessels capable of providing OVR bases and the area of ​​submarine exit from bases. After all, the main thing for us is to make more boats for the caliber. And this is not counting the absence of PMO ships in the bases. And those that are, .... in general, just are. For the report.
  36. sailor roman
    sailor roman 27 August 2020 10: 57
    +5
    I remember that in 1979 I participated in the search for American submarines in the Norwegian Sea as a trainee officer. During the search operations, our ships found two American submarines in our territorial waters, "chased" them for several hours, they left the waters, accompanied them behind the waters for several hours, until the NSh SF forced the ships to return to base. According to senior officers, at that time, American submarines were constantly in our waters and conducted reconnaissance.
  37. BOB044
    BOB044 27 August 2020 11: 51
    -1
    And Russia doesn’t care how we went to their shores and we will. Do not count how many they passed and they knew.
    1. SovAr238A
      SovAr238A 27 August 2020 20: 45
      0
      Quote: BOB044
      And Russia doesn’t care how we went to their shores and we will. Do not count how many they passed and they knew.

      And there were many incidents off their shores?
      One two?
      Are there thousands in our waters?

      Incidents are an indicator of work stress.
      Where there is work, there will certainly be incidents.
      The simplest example.
      If the machines break down, it means they work and the components wear out, and breakdowns occur ...
      And if they do not break at all, then there is no work and no wear.
      Is the analogy clear?
  38. EVDmitri
    EVDmitri 27 August 2020 13: 10
    0
    "Katz offers to surrender"? belay
  39. Saint
    Saint 27 August 2020 16: 21
    -1
    Quote: Pereira
    So that's it. Just one submarine and immediately a radical turning point in the war.

    Well, this is not just a boat, this is a mega-super-super-super-fucking mother-boat, one is able to erase and powder all the robe to hell. wassat
  40. NordUral
    NordUral 27 August 2020 22: 09
    -1
    Therefore, according to the American edition of The War Zone, the published photographs are a new signal for the Kremlin, which was shown the capabilities of the US submarine forces in the region.


    And what new have they demonstrated?