At "Army-2020" presented the mobile complex "Rat" to combat UAVs

The latest mobile laser complex to combat drones called "Rat" was presented as part of the military-technical forum "Army-2020".

The Rat complex exhibited at the forum is designed to detect, suppress and destroy various drones. The complex is able to detect a drone with an effective reflection surface of 0,01 sq.m and a speed of up to 200 km/h at a distance of 3,5 km. To suppress the electronic equipment of the UAV, microwave radiation is used, which is effective within a radius of up to 2,5 km from the complex. For physical destruction drones laser equipment is used, starting to operate at a distance of up to 1 km.

The complex includes: an armored car SBA-70K2, created on the basis of "KamAZ", a detection radar, a system of directional electronic suppression, a complex of automatic recognition and suppression of telecommunication control channels of drones, a system of directed laser destruction, an optical-electronic surveillance and search system, a single intelligent onboard combat control system that provides integration, processing and display of information

- says the description of the "Rat" complex.

The SBA-70K armored vehicle protects the crew from small arms bullets weapons caliber 7,62 mm, mine protection is installed, withstand the detonation of an explosive device up to 4 kg in TNT equivalent under the wheel. Wheel formula 6X6, full drive, speed - 90 km / h, power reserve - 1000 km.

Comments

[evgen1221]

It was necessary to add US forward! - it would have looked both menacing and cool.

[Temples]

The complex is capable of detecting a drone with an effective reflection surface of 0,01 square meters and a speed of up to 200 km / h at a distance of 3,5 km.

This is a very small area.
How many similar machines do you need to create more or less protection?
A dozen to each shelf?

I understand the manufacturer's interest in riveting tens of thousands of them.

Do you need it?

[svp67]

Quote: Temples

Do you need it?

Judging by the way now massively began to use any flying "little thing", then YES, NECESSARY. Do not forget that in addition to reconnaissance quadcopters, now more and more all kinds of kamikaze drones are being produced, and all kinds of "explosive surprises" are being attached to scouts.

Israeli drone kamikaze

[Temples]

Laser affected area 1 km.

If there is fog, the Jewish kamikaze will oppose this miracle of technology.
Or speaking in Russian, it will disable it.

the included "microwave" on this machine will be an excellent target for a rocket.
The speed of the UAV that the machine can land is no more than 200 km.
Taking into account the radius of action, only 3 km. this unit will be destroyed before it can do anything.

It turns out this is a unit for combating civilian drones.

Then why an armored car?

Put everything on the UAZ.
Or are they afraid that they will not be able to shoot down the UAV?
Then why all this?

[Grazdanin]

Very necessary. The number of Converted civilian drones will increase. The armor against them is redundant.

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Temples

This is a very small area.
How many similar machines do you need to create more or less protection?
A dozen to each shelf?

Well, in general, it is intended for the battlefield, but there are not many drones flying

[Lopatov]

Quote: Lipchanin

Well, actually it is intended for the battlefield

Controversial.
Base chassis from "Protection"
That is, it looks like it is for the National Guard.
Well, foreign customers.

[Polite Moose]

Quote: Temples

This is a very small area.
How many similar machines do you need to create more or less protection?
A dozen to each shelf?

Personally, I see sl. positive moment: the appearance of a combat module sharpened on small fleas with a very low cost of a "shot". The fact that he was bolted to an armored car is not a dogma. And the fact that he is single - too. Such BM can be delivered to objects even on a tripod, even on a horse-drawn carriage, even on a scow full of mullet. The main thing is to provide food. With the provision of the necessary density of placement of such BM, about all sorts of swarms of micro-UAVs, UAVs-kamikaze, as well as about all sorts of partisan crafts can be forgotten. I believe that over time, the channel channel of the complex, the range of detection and destruction will be increased.

[Grits]

Quote: Polite Elk

Personally, I see sl. positive moment: the appearance of a combat module sharpened on small fleas with a very low cost of a "shot". T

If I am not mistaken, the triaxial one is not "Shot", but "Bulat". But the name is not the point. It is pleasantly surprising that this database is still in demand. I thought they had already given up on them. Unlike other fancy ones, it is really relatively simple and cheap.

[seregin-s1]

The radar is capable of detecting a drone with an effective reflection surface of 0,01 square meters and a speed of up to 200 km / h at a distance of 3,5 km. Microwave radiation can begin to effectively suppress drone electronics in a sphere with a radius of 2,5 km.
It also carries out round-the-clock scanning of the airspace in automatic mode without human intervention. The complex is capable of recognizing and suppressing telecommunication channels in the range of 2 ... 6 GHz in a sphere with a radius of up to 1 km. If an enemy drone does break through, then at a distance of 1 km it will be guaranteed to be destroyed by a laser strike. This not only blinds the drone's optics, but also physical destruction of the aircraft.

[seregin-s1]

Apparently for the protection of significant objects.

[Klingon]

from barrage drones-bombs it is the most, but what do you need to beat for 10 km on such trifles from a laser? so for this there are Wasps and Shells to work on larger and more distant targets. Moreover, both microwave and lasers in such a compact design do not work at long ranges yet.

[svp67]

A machine to combat small-sized UAVs, with its own radar ... 3,5 km radius of action, roughly speaking for a battalion, and how many such "trifles" can be used by the enemy, and how many can this complex fight at the same time or how much within 10 minutes is able to destroy?
According to the mind, such a complex should be in every battalion, plus several vehicles to cover artillery, the headquarters of the regiment (brigade) and rear services ... Somewhere from 10 it turns out, that is, a company ...

[Pereira]

What if the drone doesn't fly that close? Chasing him?
In Syria, would you protect against Turkish drones? Oh, I doubt it.
Such a machine is only good for guarding the palaces of the nouveau riche from annoying journalists with quadcopters.

[svp67]

Quote: Pereira

In Syria, would you protect against Turkish drones?

It's not against such big ones, but against every little thing ...

[Pereira]

It's too expensive a catch against such a trifle.
For Syria, the Jihad mobile will fit. And if the troops are supplied in droves, then on the BTR-80 block on the roof or in the body of Shishige with unloading, assembly and camouflage at the position of the battalion.

[Kart]

It was the complex that was shown. In this case, on such a chassis.
You can definitely bet on something else.

[rags]

Not cheaper to buy Rex-2 from Kalashnikov, the suppression radius is the same (according to the manufacturer's statement)

[seregin-s1]

Of course cheaper, but it has one suppression method, not three.

[Vasyan1971]

When to Syria for trials in a real combat situation? In the same Khmeimim?

[bald]

This machine will have to be very much protected, it is just necessary, the developers understand the level of tolerance. I'm talking about the fight against serious electronics. Oh, the thing is necessary and promising.

[yfast]

And if microphones are installed in tank-hazardous areas, won't it be cheaper? This little thing flies low, engine parameters are known, environmentally friendly, undetectable. You can check it every day with a test drone. And then they mold whole tanks to fight flies.

[aszzz888]

For the physical destruction of drones, laser equipment is used, starting to operate at a distance of up to 1 km.

Of course not much, within sight, but still. I believe that at this distance the destruction of the UAV will be 100%.

[sen]

Israel uses a similar installation to protect facilities.

[Eug]

Another type of armored car?