Military Review

In Russia, completed state tests of an improved early warning system

70
In Russia, completed state tests of an improved early warning system

Russia has completed state tests of an advanced missile attack warning system (EWS), and its transfer is scheduled for September. Sergei Boev, the general designer of the early warning system, the head of the Vympel IAC concern, announced this within the framework of the Army-2020 forum.


According to Boev, the state tests of the improved early warning system were successful, the existing comments from the military will be corrected by September this year, after which the system will be finally transferred to the Ministry of Defense.

State tests of the advanced missile attack warning system have been completed successfully. By the end of September, we will eliminate the received comments and transfer them to the customer for operation

- he added.

As previously reported, the advanced early warning system includes a network of ground-based over-the-horizon radars "Voronezh" and a unified space system (EKS) "Kupol", which includes the "Tundra" tracking satellites.

Today the Voronezh station controls all directions of probable launches of ballistic and cruise missiles. The stations are located in the Leningrad, Kaliningrad, Irkutsk, Orenburg regions, in the Altai, Krasnodar and Krasnoyarsk regions. Two new stations are being built near Murmansk and Vorkuta, another is planned to be built in Crimea. The Kupol CSC currently includes four Tundra satellites, but by 2024 it should be brought to 10 spacecraft.
70 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pessimist22
    Pessimist22 25 August 2020 14: 17 New
    19
    You just have to say that as soon as we fix some kind of launch in our direction, no matter which missile, 10 R 36m are sent for recycling to the USA and everything stabilizes.
    1. passerby
      passerby 25 August 2020 14: 28 New
      +6
      Why say something to someone, you need to silently launch all the missiles that are available in NATO countries and that's it.
      1. Starover_Z
        Starover_Z 25 August 2020 19: 52 New
        +3
        Quote: passerby
        Why say something to someone, you need to silently launch all the missiles that are available in NATO countries and that's it.

        These are not bows and arrows! And then it will be exactly according to Stevenson - "The survivors will envy the dead!"
    2. Borik
      Borik 25 August 2020 14: 29 New
      +2
      You just have to say that as soon as we fix some kind of launch in our direction, no matter which missile, 10 R 36m are sent for recycling to the USA and everything stabilizes.


      To live in peace, the United States must be disposed of to sterility, and then stability will come to the world.
      1. antivirus
        antivirus 25 August 2020 14: 44 New
        +2
        on the contrary, everyone will climb for prize money from everyone who seems weaker
      2. Sailor
        Sailor 25 August 2020 14: 47 New
        12
        With all due respect, you forgot to mention England, only by resetting them we can live peacefully without intrigues of various types.
        1. krot
          krot 25 August 2020 15: 34 New
          +3
          With all due respect, you forgot to mention England

          I fully agree with you here! The USA is dull, but the Englishwoman knows how to shit skillfully.
        2. Ax Matt
          Ax Matt 26 August 2020 03: 48 New
          -1
          Yes, from these goats all the intrigues have been going on since the time of Peter. And Churchill tore and thrashed when such a good Stalin-Roosevelt alliance was planned ... Maybe they "killed" Roosevelt so quickly, just before the end of the war ...
      3. Jack O'Neill
        Jack O'Neill 25 August 2020 14: 47 New
        -4
        To live in peace, the United States must be disposed of to sterility, and then stability will come to the world.

        I think that if you set an example, we will definitely sterilize the USA!
        To get started, just close your browser and never open it again. Believe me, the United States will feel this and it will be very damaging to them.
        1. Senka naughty
          Senka naughty 25 August 2020 18: 42 New
          0
          Quote: Jack O'Neill
          To live in peace, the United States must be disposed of to sterility, and then stability will come to the world.

          I think that if you set an example, we will definitely sterilize the USA!
          To get started, just close your browser and never open it again. Believe me, the United States will feel this and it will be very damaging to them.

          On a thin one .. only in vain did you decide that someone invented the Internet .. and so you write plots for the crap))
          1. Jack O'Neill
            Jack O'Neill 25 August 2020 20: 00 New
            -3
            On a thin one .. only in vain did you decide that someone invented the Internet

            In your alluring little world, the Internet could and simply appear, just like a big bang.
      4. bayard
        bayard 26 August 2020 01: 10 New
        +1
        Quote: Borik
        To live in peace, the United States must be disposed of to sterility, then stability will come in the world

        But what about the Englishwoman, who is no less crap?
        More likely. yes
        And what will we do with China - with its ambitions and pressure? winked
        Are there really few different pests in this sublunary world?
        For full stability, there may not be enough cartridges. request
        But I like the way you think. yes bully
    3. Jack O'Neill
      Jack O'Neill 25 August 2020 14: 42 New
      -3
      You just have to say

      Do not. Everyone already knows and understands it. And it works not only in our direction, but also in theirs.
    4. RUnnm
      RUnnm 25 August 2020 14: 54 New
      0
      Do you remember the launch from Norway (in my opinion) under Yeltsin?
    5. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 25 August 2020 14: 58 New
      +3
      Quote: Pessimist22
      You just have to say that as soon as we fix some kind of launch in our direction, no matter which missile, 10 R 36m are sent for recycling to the USA and everything stabilizes.

      So this ... it's been almost three months now:
      19. The conditions that determine the possibility of the use of nuclear weapons by the Russian Federation are:

      a) the receipt of reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles attacking the territory of the Russian Federation and (or) its allies;

      b) the use by the enemy of nuclear weapons or other types of weapons of mass destruction in the territories of the Russian Federation and (or) its allies;

      c) the enemy's influence on critical state or military facilities of the Russian Federation, the disabling of which will lead to the disruption of the response actions of the nuclear forces;

      d) aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is jeopardized.
      © Fundamentals of the State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Field of Nuclear Deterrence. Approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of June 2, 2020 No. 355.

      It is noteworthy that in subparagraph a) there is no division into the types of warheads of the attacking missile - nuclear or non-nuclear. Any ballistic missile launched on the territory of the Russian Federation and / or its allies will be considered as a missile with nuclear warheads.
      1. Liam
        Liam 25 August 2020 15: 10 New
        -7
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Remarkable

        And how will reliably to determine that the launching rocket goes to the Russian Federation, and not to China, for example?
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 25 August 2020 15: 25 New
          +3
          Quote: Liam
          And how will they reliably determine that a launching rocket is going to the Russian Federation, and not to China, for example?

          And this is how the early warning system will determine the parameters of the trajectory. smile
          1. Liam
            Liam 25 August 2020 15: 30 New
            -13
            ))) The SPRN in its current form will not do this with the required accuracy and quickly enough. So leave the letters on paper)
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 25 August 2020 16: 08 New
              -1
              Quote: Liam
              ))) The SPRN in its current form will not do this with the required accuracy and quickly enough. So leave the letters on paper)

              This means that there is no need to launch a BR in the direction of the Russian Federation at all.

              In fact, clause 19 a) is directed against the fashionable concept of a global non-nuclear strike - which allows the use of ballistic missiles in non-nuclear weapons against targets around the world. The problem is that the non-nuclearness of an ICBM / SLBM can only be determined by the fact that the warhead has finished. And no one can guarantee that the launch of 3-4 non-nuclear ballistic missiles "against terrorists" will not result in a disarming MIRV strike. Let me remind you that in order to disable 40% of the strategic warheads of the Russian Federation, only 4-5 SBS are needed.

              In general, non-nuclear ICBMs are a very dangerous toy. The party using them has the illusion of the possibility of a successful disarming strike by replacing non-nuclear warheads with nuclear ones at the next launch. And for the remaining nuclear powers, which are forced to bring their strategic nuclear forces at least to DEFCON 2 at each launch of non-nuclear ballistic missiles, sooner or later, purely according to statistics, an early warning system will give a signal of a strike on their territory. And it's good if the service officers have time to confirm that this is a system failure. And if not?
              1. Liam
                Liam 25 August 2020 16: 20 New
                0
                All this is clear and well-known. "Global" non-nuclear strike is about the CD and not the BR.
                I mean that you should not raise this document to the rank of a bible. It is full of shortcomings, controversial and simply far-fetched points and will not serve as an unconditional guide to action. Let's just say it is declaration of intent)


                17. The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear weapons and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and (or) its allies, as well as in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when itself is threatened. existence of the state
                Does the landing of a Japanese landing on the Kuriles endanger the very existence of the state?)
                And according to the technical capabilities of the early warning system:
                https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2816278.html
                1. Alexey RA
                  Alexey RA 25 August 2020 16: 49 New
                  0
                  Quote: Liam
                  All this is clear and well-known. "Global" non-nuclear strike is about the CD and not the BR.

                  Not certainly in that way. The "Tomahawks" and the ex-SSBN "Ohio" converted for them were only the first approximation to the concept of Prompt Global Strike (Rapid Global Strike).
                  The very same PGS concept provides for three types of warhead carriers for a global strike:
                  - Non-nuclear land and sea-based ballistic missiles similar to strategic ICBMs / SLBMs.
                  - Cruise missiles launched from air carriers.
                  - Space launch platforms with kinetic warheads.
                  Quote: Liam
                  And according to the technical capabilities of the early warning system:
                  https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2816278.html

                  So this is only the cosmic part. The data from which require confirmation by the ground part - the radar. They also provide data for calculating the BR trajectories.
                  1. Liam
                    Liam 25 August 2020 16: 53 New
                    +1
                    Ground-based radars provide data only on warheads in their final phase of flight. Approximately the last 2-3 thousand km of trajectory. A little late for warning blow

                    PySy. The current space group, due to its small number, is capable of detecting, with grief in half, launches only from the territory of the United States itself, and then not 7/7 and 24/24 but in fits and starts.
            2. An64
              An64 26 August 2020 13: 40 New
              +1
              Quote: Liam
              ))) The SPRN in its current form will not do this with the required accuracy and quickly enough. So leave the letters on paper)

              Why not? Can you be more specific?
    6. venik
      venik 25 August 2020 17: 11 New
      +1
      Quote: Pessimist22
      You just have to say that as soon as we fix some kind of launch in our direction, no matter which missile, 10 R 36m are sent for recycling to the USA and everything stabilizes.

      =========
      good Moreover, the disposal takes place exclusively at the expense of the "receiving" party !!! laughing drinks
    7. NordUral
      NordUral 25 August 2020 20: 34 New
      -1
      I totally agree with you!
  2. Vladimir Mashkov
    Vladimir Mashkov 25 August 2020 14: 26 New
    +2
    The missile defense system is being improved and developed. Very good news!
  3. Split
    Split 25 August 2020 14: 27 New
    0
    Si vis pacem, para bellum (s)
  4. Rostislav
    Rostislav 25 August 2020 14: 31 New
    +4
    Good news. And the right move is the emphasis on specifics, to report on what has been done.
  5. Nikolay1987
    Nikolay1987 25 August 2020 14: 53 New
    +2
    Don't you think that such a publication as "Voennoye Obozreniye" should post articles about new products and other things from such events as Army2020, etc.?
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 25 August 2020 15: 02 New
      +7
      Quote: Nikolay1987
      Don't you think that such a publication as "Voennoye Obozreniye" should post articles about new products and other things from such events as Army2020, etc.?

      So they posted about camouflage robes. smile
      1. Nikolay1987
        Nikolay1987 25 August 2020 15: 25 New
        +2
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Quote: Nikolay1987
        Don't you think that such a publication as "Voennoye Obozreniye" should post articles about new products and other things from such events as Army2020, etc.?

        So they posted about camouflage robes. smile

        We are waiting for the regiment of battle priests laughing
        1. Split
          Split 25 August 2020 15: 31 New
          0
          In vain you are so ... Faith is a powerful tool ... In the Middle Ages, the ministers of the church sometimes walked in the forefront, the same chaplains, for example
  6. Nehist
    Nehist 25 August 2020 14: 55 New
    -3
    I'm wondering !!! All these systems will still not save you from mutual destruction! And not a single country has a guaranteed missile defense system! Meaning?
    1. Jack O'Neill
      Jack O'Neill 25 August 2020 15: 12 New
      -8
      I'm wondering !!! All these systems will still not save you from mutual destruction! And not a single country has a guaranteed missile defense system! Meaning?

      Just another cut.
      Well, if they see the missiles, then what next? Nothing can be done exactly by all, only to launch rockets in response, i.e. take as many people with you as possible.
      We will still have the means to retaliate against the US even after nuclear mushrooms begin to grow in our country. Therefore, this SPRN is a cut. She gives nothing, but the money is invested.
      It would be better if they gave me the money, since I would at least spend it on business.
      1. Split
        Split 25 August 2020 15: 14 New
        +5
        Quote: Jack O'Neill
        It would be better if they gave me the money, since I would at least spend it on business.

        Well, yes ... well, yes ... I wouldn't give you a ruble
        1. Jack O'Neill
          Jack O'Neill 25 August 2020 15: 18 New
          0
          Well, yes ... well, yes ... I wouldn't give you a ruble

          Not that you have it ...
          1. Split
            Split 25 August 2020 15: 20 New
            -3
            I dare to disappoint you, not only the ruble, but also with 6 zeros behind
            1. Jack O'Neill
              Jack O'Neill 25 August 2020 15: 23 New
              -1
              I dare to disappoint you, not only the ruble, but also with 6 zeros behind

              Pfft, I have seven zeros.
              1. Split
                Split 25 August 2020 15: 25 New
                0
                Apparently there is no ruble in front ... give your zeroes to the poor and needy, for example laughing
                1. Jack O'Neill
                  Jack O'Neill 25 August 2020 15: 39 New
                  -1
                  Apparently there is no ruble in front ... give your toes to the poor and needy, for example, laughing

                  You have six zeros, you have enough.
                  1. Split
                    Split 25 August 2020 15: 42 New
                    -2
                    You know, but not enough ... toys, strollers, diapers, a wife with a residence permit on the Arbat
                    1. Jack O'Neill
                      Jack O'Neill 25 August 2020 15: 52 New
                      -2
                      You know, but not enough ... toys, strollers, diapers, a wife with a residence permit on the Arbat

                      Well, you know, like this, if you throw back the zeroes for each, then he himself will not have it.
                      Try to save! Doshirak costs 50 rubles. cheap? Cheap, and most importantly - useful! No more harmful than other products, for sure. But the price is 50 rubles. Do you know how much a piece of beef costs? Yes, not 60 rubles. The benefits are obvious.
                      Doshirak is both great for people, women and children. 150 rubles per day for three people? Penny!
                      Diapers? .. Are you not a patriot or what? Throw out this disgrace of the State Department!
                      They took a sheet and twisted the little thing into it.
                      Toys? The Doshirak box will do.
                      Wife with a residence permit at work? Well, then, you can save 50 rubles a day on Doshik. The wife will eat at work.
                      1. Split
                        Split 25 August 2020 15: 56 New
                        0
                        Quote: Jack O'Neill
                        The wife will eat at work.

                        I wish your
                        Quote: Jack O'Neill
                        They took the sheet and twisted it

                        Eat doshiki yourself
                      2. Jack O'Neill
                        Jack O'Neill 25 August 2020 16: 02 New
                        0
                        I wish your

                        Yes, I myself happen to eat at work, which is already there. But only if it were still free ...

                        Eat doshiki yourself

                        I eat. And you know - I'm proud of it!
                        Doshirak for the body is much better than the same soup, chicken, for example.
                      3. Split
                        Split 25 August 2020 16: 09 New
                        0
                        Well, I disagree about the doshik laughing
                      4. Jack O'Neill
                        Jack O'Neill 25 August 2020 16: 31 New
                        0
                        Well, I disagree about the doshik laughing


                        Take zucchini 70 per kg, potatoes in the same way, rub on a coarse grater, onion, chank ... to taste .... a couple of eggs, flour 4-7 tablespoons of the amount, fry ... Potato pancakes were clearly superfluous (c) What they say Men

                        I don't eat zucchini. And there is so much chemistry in eggs that the entire periodic table will fit in there. Than chickens just do not prick. And antibiotics, and enhancers to grow faster and much more.
                        But if we talk about cheap zhrachan, then it can be peas, bones, potatoes, fried onions and peppers. Up to 400 rubles and everyone has enough saucepan for a day. Hearty, tasty.
                    2. Split
                      Split 25 August 2020 16: 12 New
                      0
                      Take zucchini 70 per kg, potatoes in the same way, rub on a coarse grater, onion, chank ... to taste .... a couple of eggs, flour 4-7 tablespoons of the amount, fry ... Potato pancakes were clearly superfluous (c) What they say Men
                2. Split
                  Split 25 August 2020 16: 00 New
                  0
                  "Why are you staring, all of you d ... u ... do not have the spirit to be whoever you want, you see for the last time that a bad one behaved this way" (c) Al Pacino ... Famous film
  • Krasnoyarsk
    Krasnoyarsk 25 August 2020 16: 17 New
    0
    Quote: Jack O'Neill
    Well, if they see the missiles, then what next?

    And then the command - start! And those of ours, the strategic ones, who, thanks to the early warning system, were not destroyed, flew to the foe to explain that - you shouldn't have done that, oh, you shouldn't.
  • Split
    Split 25 August 2020 15: 12 New
    +1
    The point of these systems is to prevent your missiles from being destroyed. Although our mines are protected and capable of withstanding even a direct hit. I have a friend ... I built them at one time near Yasny and Dombarovka ... Yes, even when the Dnieper flies over your head, you involuntarily believe in our strength ... though only 7 launches were found before moving to Moscow
    1. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 25 August 2020 16: 23 New
      +1
      [quote = Spli Although our mines are protected and able to withstand quite a direct hit. [/ quote]
      I'm embarrassed to ask, a direct hit of what? Really ballistic with nuclear warheads?
      1. Split
        Split 26 August 2020 16: 50 New
        0
        Yes, even a nuclear charge
        Quote: Belov
        For the destruction of mine installations, an extremely strong impact is required. Our mines were designed for overpressure up to one hundred atmospheres
        Examine the mat part. Achieve an accurate hit, even taking into account the fact that their KVOs are very good, but they will not provide 100% of hits, and taking into account the use of an early warning system ... the mines will already be empty
        I understand, tk. lived in the area of ​​the town of Yasny, where our missiles are stationed and have 1 military clearance
        1. Krasnoyarsk
          Krasnoyarsk 26 August 2020 19: 38 New
          +1
          Quote: Split
          I understand, tk. lived in the area of ​​Yasny,

          You lived in the area, and I participated in their construction. 3rd defensive belt, 3rd, 4th and 9th missile areas. So you bent cold about
          Quote: Split
          Yes, even a nuclear charge

          An early warning missile system exists in order to get rid of our missiles in time from under the attack and send them to visit the enemy.
          1. Split
            Split 26 August 2020 19: 44 New
            0
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            The early warning system exists in order to get rid of our missiles in time from under attack and send them to visit the adversary

            Then you yourself are against my post, I generally said why sprn, about the rest ... I will not comment ... and I do not want
          2. Split
            Split 26 August 2020 19: 45 New
            0
            Built ... under my direction
            1. Krasnoyarsk
              Krasnoyarsk 26 August 2020 20: 09 New
              0
              Quote: Split
              Built ... under my direction

              When I did this, you were too young for such leadership.
              1. Split
                Split 26 August 2020 20: 11 New
                0
                Well then you're already dead
                1. Krasnoyarsk
                  Krasnoyarsk 26 August 2020 20: 22 New
                  0
                  Quote: Split
                  Well then you're already dead

                  Or you. Because you are more likely to become one by age.
                  1. Split
                    Split 26 August 2020 20: 26 New
                    0
                    I'm tired already
  • Polite Moose
    Polite Moose 25 August 2020 15: 14 New
    +3
    Quote: Nehist
    Meaning?

    Dispel some hopes of the first disarming strike and buy time for us to retaliate. The main goal: so that everyone sat at the opera level and did not have to use missile defense.
    PS The minus is not mine. hi
  • Orange bigg
    Orange bigg 25 August 2020 15: 21 New
    +1
    To have time to make a retaliatory strike, so that there would be a combat draw in the end and no one would be offended. Again, knowing the result of an attempt to attack the country and what consequences it will lead to, that is, there will be no winners, not least because of the timely command to respond blow, it is unlikely that anyone in their right mind decides to start such a useless war in its end. If it were not an early warning system, then perhaps someone decided to try his luck. They say they will not have time to give an answer. But if there is an EWS, they will have time to give a otvet. And therefore, no one has the temptation to attack. The EWS as a fuse against the Apocalypse. hi
    1. Split
      Split 25 August 2020 15: 24 New
      -2
      IMHO the probability of mutual exchange is negligible. The United States had plans for bombing in the 50s ... but did not risk it, because we would have paved the whole of Europe with tanks. But this does not mean that an early warning missile system is not needed ... In addition, they watch not only the launches wassat
    2. Nehist
      Nehist 25 August 2020 15: 32 New
      -8
      This worked until the 70s of the last century !!! With the advent of mobile, mine and even more submarine carriers, the early warning system has outlived its usefulness, especially considering the number of carriers. In fact, it is meaningless. 10 minutes difference when exchanging vigorous loaves does not play! With the same success, we can blow up our entire nuclear arsenal at home, the kirdyk will still come to everyone only later
      1. ycuce234-san
        ycuce234-san 27 August 2020 01: 21 New
        0
        the early warning system has outlived its usefulness, especially given the number of carriers.


        The SPRN also has a second - economic meaning. If you do not have such systems, then in order to survive after the first sudden strike, a sufficient number of carriers of the latter, even well protected from damaging factors, are needed a lot. And they are not cheap to produce and maintain. The flip side of frugality is the risk of an accidental nuclear apocalypse due to a technical failure, because the question is always being asked - to start a mass launch or massively lose carriers.
  • Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 25 August 2020 15: 35 New
    +5
    Quote: Nehist
    I'm wondering !!! All these systems will still not save you from mutual destruction! And not a single country has a guaranteed missile defense system! Meaning?

    There is only one point - maintaining peace through guaranteed infliction of unacceptable damage to the enemy in the event of the use of nuclear weapons.
    The further and wider the early warning system looks, the greater the likelihood that, instead of a retaliatory strike weakened by the enemy SBS, the Strategic Missile Forces and Co. will have time to carry out a retaliatory strike by all means. This means that it makes no sense to strike the first blow - there will be no winners. After us - silence. © Strategic Missile Forces
  • NordUral
    NordUral 25 August 2020 20: 36 New
    -1
    Until now, they saved. Maybe these minds are not enough not to start a world war.
  • An64
    An64 26 August 2020 13: 45 New
    +1
    Quote: Nehist
    I'm wondering !!! All these systems will still not save you from mutual destruction! And not a single country has a guaranteed missile defense system! Meaning?

    It used to be called "nuclear parity". Everyone knows that he can guaranteed to destroy the enemy, but also guaranteed to be destroyed himself.
  • askort154
    askort154 25 August 2020 15: 27 New
    +1
    Today the Voronezh station controls all directions of probable launches of ballistic and cruise missiles. The stations are located in the Leningrad, Kaliningrad, Irkutsk, Orenburg regions, in the Altai, Krasnodar and Krasnoyarsk regions. Two new stations are being built near Murmansk and Vorkuta, another is planned to be built in Crimea.

    This is good news. All new radars are located only in Russia. Those who used to be behind its chapels: Lithuania, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan - have gone into oblivion.
    Only two objects still remain in Belarus - the Volga radar and the communications center of the Russian Navy.
    An intergovernmental agreement on their use was signed in 1995, for a period of 25 years - it expires in 2021. But the Voronezh radar station is already operating in Kaliningrad, covering the Volga zone.
  • tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 25 August 2020 15: 42 New
    +1
    Let's dream a little! Night. The United States is unknown why, think of the reason for yourself, they launch one, two, etc., missiles at us. Our early warning system immediately detects this launch. There is time to congratulate the Americans on the retaliatory strike and their allies too. All this is done without us, we are asleep. While the nuclear strike warning system is activated, we sleep. Then we wake up "joyfully" and do the last substitute business. In America, the same thing, but they have evening, they see the start of their ends of the world, or maybe not They come in if they shoot from under the water. There is no difference, the kerdyk is global. These gizmos will never fly until someone comes up with something futoristic and disarming within a few minutes, or better seconds. Glory to the Strategic Missile Forces and the creators of the SPRN. We live peacefully enjoy life We will die out all over time, but definitely not a nuclear bomb. drinks
  • Old26
    Old26 26 August 2020 15: 26 New
    +1
    Quote: askort154
    All new radars are located only in Russia. Those who used to be behind its chapels: Lithuania, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan - have gone into oblivion.
    Only two objects still remain in Belarus - the Volga radar and the communications center of the Russian Navy.

    Yes, gone into oblivion. earlier they were built on the territory of the "fraternal republics" by virtue of the ABM treaty, because it was written there that stations with phased array can be located only along the perimeter of the country with an outward orientation. At one time we got burned at the Krasnoyarsk radar station. She was not on the perimeter, but in the depths of the country