Lukashenko signed a decree on the resignation of the Belarusian Ambassador to Slovakia, he promised to return to Belarus

175

On the eve of the President of Belarus, whose appearance with a gun was discussed in the media of various countries, dismissed the Ambassador of the Republic of Belarus in Slovakia. We are talking about the Belarusian diplomat Igor Leshchen, who allowed himself to declare his support for the protests in Belarus and his actual disagreement with the policy of the official authorities. Leshchenya recorded a video message, where he stated that he supported the protesters in the Republic of Belarus. After a while, he wrote a letter of resignation.

According to the laws of the Republic of Belarus, the final decision on whether to leave the ambassador in office or remove him is made by the president. Earlier, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Belarus reminded of this legal norm.



Now it became known that Alexander Lukashenko had signed a corresponding decree - a decree on the resignation of Igor Leshchenya from the post of Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Belarus to the Republic of Slovakia.

Leshchenya himself previously stated that after his resignation he intends to return from Bratislava to Minsk. So far there is no information that Leshchenya returned to Belarus.

Meanwhile, another telephone conversation took place between Alexander Lukashenko and Vladimir Putin. The press services of both presidents report that the topic of negotiations was testing a vaccine against coronavirus. It was noted that Belarus will voluntarily take part in the 3rd stage of testing the Russian vaccine.

The message from the press services of the heads of state does not say about negotiations on the political situation in Belarus.
175 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +29
    25 August 2020 05: 18
    We are talking about the Belarusian diplomat Igor Leshchen, who allowed himself to declare his support for the protests in Belarus and his actual disagreement with the policy of the official authorities. Leshchenya recorded a video message, where he stated that he supported the protesters in the Republic of Belarus.

    Bet on the wrong horse ...
    And he went, scorched by the sun and driven by the wind ...
    1. -59
      25 August 2020 05: 24
      Quite to that. He bet on the Belarusian people. Lukashenkos come and go, but the Belarusian people remain.
      1. +53
        25 August 2020 05: 44
        The Belarusian people are the same Russian people. The protesters under the flags of Nazi collaborators and with the slogan "live Belarus" came out to the square to destroy themselves. wassat
        I understood the slogan “Down with Lukashenka”, but then what? It was Lukashenka who created the present country, to live like under Lukashenka, but without him it is impossible. It means that something needs to be changed. And here, to the question "what and how"? There is still no answer ... Pronouncing the mantras "freedom" and democracy "cannot be considered an answer. For all the good ... Where is the economic program?
        1. -39
          25 August 2020 06: 44
          Quote: Tank jacket
          went to the square to destroy themselves.
          Did they tell you this themselves or do you know better from Russia? laughing
          Quote: Tank jacket
          It was Lukashenka who created the present country, to live like under Lukashenka, but without him it is impossible.
          Okay, your suggestions? Leave Lukashenka until they carry them forward? We will not change anything for another decade, we will live under the rule of the king, who spends the lion's share of the budget?
          Quote: Tank jacket
          It means that something needs to be changed. And here, to the question "what and how"? There is still no answer ... Pronouncing the mantras "freedom" and democracy "cannot be considered an answer. For all the good ... Where is the economic program?
          Opposition candidates had programs, whom Lukashenka cowardly imprisoned right before the elections. And naturally, given the artificially created lack of competition, one can say that there is no alternative, the opposition cannot do anything, the whole of Belarus rests on one Lukashenka. Well, it's funny.
          1. +13
            25 August 2020 07: 06
            Perhaps everyone understands that Lukashenka did a lot of good for Belarus, but did not take into account that he was simply tired of the citizens (however, like our "guarantor" in Russia). Remember how before the program "Time" - "Benifis of Leonid Ilyich and a little about the weather." And the further, the worse!
            The problem is in the continuity of the state course ... In social policy ... In the irreplaceable leader ...
            Are you sure that the programs of the opposition candidates were not written in the State Department? And will the good intentions of the candidates become reality after the selection of one of these presidential candidates?
            1. -18
              25 August 2020 07: 22
              Quote: Yngvar
              Lukashenka did a lot of good for Belarus, but did not take into account that he was simply tired of citizens
              This was expected. Therefore, the turnover of power is also important.
              Quote: Yngvar
              The problem is in the continuity of the state's course ...
              If the state's course is flawed, then there is no point in continuity. The course must be completely changed. As for example, the Bolsheviks did in their time.
              Quote: Yngvar
              Are you sure that the programs of the opposition candidates were not written in the State Department? And will the good intentions of the candidates become reality after the selection of one of these presidential candidates?
              If you see only the hand of the State Department everywhere and are afraid of everything and everyone, then you can reach paranoia. And while sitting in a swamp, afraid to change something in life.
              1. +6
                25 August 2020 07: 33
                It is difficult to disagree with you, and YES - the "swamp" is already fed up!
                The “activity” of nationalists and the drift (and outright flight) of candidates towards the West are alarming in current events. And also the speeches in the media of these candidates in company with the "real democrats" ...
                1. -15
                  25 August 2020 08: 20
                  The drift was in the direction of Russia. And after the election results are recognized, what good can we expect?
                  1. +4
                    25 August 2020 17: 39
                    Come on, you forest boy. Those clowns who run with pagonyas and other salo-flags have never looked towards Russia. Well, perhaps with hatred.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
                2. -10
                  25 August 2020 10: 19
                  Russia supported Lukashenka, so there is nothing surprising that the opposition has changed the vector.
                  1. +5
                    25 August 2020 17: 40
                    Changed the vector from anti-Russian to anti-Russian?
                  2. +2
                    26 August 2020 03: 55
                    Don't la-la! "Shchaz, aha", changed in an hour. With what "vector" she was, she stayed with that.
                3. +5
                  25 August 2020 14: 57
                  Igor must definitely return to prove his love for Belarus and sit down on the bunks that are tired of waiting for him!
                  Only he will not return, he will "love" Belarus and Belarusians from afar from abroad !!!
                  1. 0
                    26 August 2020 05: 13
                    Do not make bunks for another - you yourself will fall on them!
                    As for my love for Belarus and Belarusians, I will say the following - I respect, I have fraternal feelings for those with whom I served and I know personally!
              2. +31
                25 August 2020 07: 42
                Sweetheart. Give pzhsta at least one example of the successful development of any state in the world, after the color coup under the strict leadership of the State Department and the CIA in particular? We won't talk about Ukraine; about the dead, either good or nothing.
              3. +24
                25 August 2020 08: 27
                Quote: Greenwood
                And while sitting in a swamp, afraid to change something in life.

                Welcome to Moldova, "got out of the swamp 11 years ago , as a result of the Maidan of quivering youth (the slogan: "Change!", CHANGE is us! ") against the" falsification "of the elections by the President who has sat down for a long time by the" dictator ".

                True, I got out of the swamp, and got straight ... into the point of the courtyard toilet: the most impudent theft and corruption of the victorious pure fighters for justice, legal chaos, murder, falsification of the same elections, poverty has grown at times, like the flight of the same youth abroad (up to a third of the population)
                1. 0
                  25 August 2020 17: 43
                  Well, but not komunyaki. Just according to your recipe. So whoever speaks, but not you. For people like you have supported and support the policy that led to such a result.
                  1. -1
                    28 August 2020 08: 46
                    And you were not taught in childhood by your parents that "poking" strangers is not good? And then they usually answer like that, so that they "poke at their woman" and in real life they still give it in the neck. I certainly understand that the Internet is full of invulnerable couch experts and kitchen fighters, but all the same, you should not be like primates (in the same poke).
                    1. 0
                      28 August 2020 09: 57
                      And you do not know that on the Internet everyone does not care about your opinion? There are no authorities here.
              4. +2
                26 August 2020 16: 28
                Catherine ruled the same Russia all her life and that! Russia only flourished with her.
                1. 0
                  28 August 2020 08: 55
                  Why no one remembers Merkel ... it’s probably inconvenient to spoil the image of demoChracia.
            2. +26
              25 August 2020 08: 06
              Yngvar (Igor) Today, 07:06 I remember on the Maidan they also shouted that Yanukovych was a thief and a corrupt official. As it turned out later, he also threw his own money into the treasury. And how Gunpowh stole, there are legends about it. Conclusion: where is Yanukovych and where Poroshenko! There are no questions, why did this happen?
              1. -10
                25 August 2020 08: 49
                As it turned out later, he was throwing his own money into the treasury.

                Who found it out?
                1. +5
                  25 August 2020 09: 09
                  In terms of the state of the treasury, budget execution, external debt, the size of tariffs for services, the price of gas and electricity, prices for products, after all.
                  1. -12
                    25 August 2020 09: 50
                    that is, you personally found it out.
                    clear.
              2. -12
                25 August 2020 10: 23
                Yanukovych is on the run, while Poroshenko seems to have been prosecuted. And now the question is - is this possible in today's Belarus in relation to Lukashenka?
                1. +12
                  25 August 2020 10: 52
                  So attracted or something? A farce called the court, which considered the "Yanukovych case", did not establish anything criminal, except for a phony treason. And about 20 cases were initiated against Petya with documentary evidence of treason, corruption, theft, and the result was a mess.
                2. +5
                  25 August 2020 17: 51
                  He was not attracted anywhere ... the fact that he is presented will not pull even a reprimand) And Zelensky in fact continues Poros' policy. And what he told before the elections went down the toilet.
                3. +2
                  25 August 2020 18: 50
                  Quote: Greenwood
                  and Poroshenko seems to have been prosecuted.


                  Clownery .... The current prezik manages only within his office. Essentially nothing ..
            3. +3
              25 August 2020 08: 44
              There seems to be an example of Armenia, but it does not suit Belarus, there is a rudimentary party system and a garter military conflict with Baku (Turkey) .. And so that "winter does not start unexpectedly" for the father, it is necessary to write "amendments to the constitution, create a party of the eastern vector and a couple opposition living on state subsidies
            4. +3
              25 August 2020 16: 00
              Lukashenka is simply tired of citizens

              It's not that I'm bored. It’s that it cannot generate a new idea. The existing system began to lag behind the needs of our time, it needs to be pushed further. "Preservation" of production is not very relevant. Well saved, that's very good. What's next? Where is the next program?
              1. 0
                25 August 2020 18: 49
                Quote: Zefr
                Lukashenka is simply tired of citizens

                It's not that I'm bored. It’s that it cannot generate a new idea. The existing system began to lag behind the needs of our time, it needs to be pushed further. "Preservation" of production is not very relevant. Well saved, that's very good. What's next? Where is the next program?

                Maybe you're right. But the current coup attempt does not solve this issue at all.
          2. +21
            25 August 2020 07: 18
            Quote: Greenwood
            Opposition candidates had programs

            What kind of programs? Recognition of modern Belarus as the heiress of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, not Rus, and, accordingly, the Belarusians are descendants of Lithuanians, not Russians. The prohibition of the Russian language in production and in educational institutions, entry into the EU and NATO, the introduction of a visa regime with the Russian Federation and visa-free travel with the EU, the abolition of duties on imports from the EU, the termination of trade with the Russian Federation. Somewhere it already happened ... Oh yes, exactly! In Ukraine in 2014, except that in Ukraine they chanted "Ukraine and Europe!", And then they chant "Belarus and Lithuania!"
            1. -20
              25 August 2020 07: 30
              Whatever it is, this is a program. Albeit completely pro-Western. And if Belarusians would vote for her, then so be it. The fact that it runs counter to Russia's opinion is a problem for Russia itself. If Belarusians want to go to Europe, let them go. Why do you decide for them ?!
              By the way, the candidate Babariko was considered a completely neutral candidate. Well, Lukashenka is so afraid to give up power that he puts everyone in prison. And his anti-Russian statements before the elections only confirm that he is most worried about his own ass sitting on the throne. And from whom to beg for money, from Russia or from the EU, he does not care.
              1. +12
                25 August 2020 08: 56
                Colleague Greenwood ...
                So you say:

                Whatever it is, this is a program. Albeit completely pro-Western. And if Belarusians would vote for her, then so be it. The fact that it runs counter to Russia's opinion is a problem for Russia itself.

                Is Belarus on an island in a distant ocean?
                A simple example for you.
                Not so long ago, some gentlemen made ... swimming pools in their apartments! Believing that they live in a distant ocean, on an island. Forgetting that they have neighbors. Overlapping houses, not designed for such loads, collapsed or leaked, followed by catastrophic bays, respectively - damage to the property of the lower neighbors.
                Border with someone, no one lives in isolation, there are neighbors who must be reckoned with. Moreover, having a common border and such a close connection with Russia, which Belarus has.
                1. -6
                  25 August 2020 10: 25
                  Quote: depressant
                  Border with someone, no one lives in isolation, there are neighbors who must be reckoned with. Moreover, having a common border and such a close connection with Russia, which Belarus has.
                  In your interpretation, it looks like "Belarus itself should not decide anything, Russia will decide everything for it." Only you have forgotten that the USSR is long gone, and all its former republics have long lived their own lives and are not obliged to reckon with the opinion of their neighbors, no matter how offensive it might be to you.
                  Quote: depressant
                  Not so long ago, some gentlemen made ... swimming pools in their apartments! Believing that they live in a distant ocean, on an island. Forgetting that they have neighbors. Overlapping houses, not designed for such loads, collapsed or leaked, followed by catastrophic bays, respectively - damage to the property of the lower neighbors.
                  What do you mean by damage to neighbors' property?
                  1. +4
                    25 August 2020 10: 58
                    Colleague, honestly: I didn't want to answer. Is it really so difficult to speculate yourself? If a pro-Western power is established in Belarus, we will lose the "Volga" radar station ("Volga" radar station), located near the town of Gantsevichi in the Brest region and in 2002 adopted by the Russian Space Forces, and in 2003 put on combat duty in the system missile attack warnings.

                    In addition, we will lose the 43rd communications center of the Russian Navy "Vileika" (radio station "Antey") in the Minsk region. The facility has been operating since 1964 and provides communication on super-long waves of the General Staff of the Russian Navy with nuclear submarines, which are on alert in the Atlantic, Indian and partly Pacific oceans, and also conducts electronic reconnaissance and electronic warfare. The radio station is equipped with a 1 MW transmitter.
                    Few?
                    The value of these objects is that they are taken out of Russia, which expands the space they control, which means the ability to deter our potential adversaries. If the objects have to be returned to Russia, then this will be "property damage", so incomprehensible to you.
                    1. -7
                      25 August 2020 11: 50
                      I'll answer you easily. All these facilities were installed during Soviet times. Then there was a different country, a different government, a different foreign policy and other tasks.
                      Quote: depressant
                      which expands the space they control means the ability to deter our potential adversaries
                      I have already written, I am writing now and will probably write many more times. We have no "opponents", we have respected partners (at least according to the president). In addition, family members of many leading Russian politicians and media personalities can be called opponents of the country in which they live, have citizenship and assets. Citizens of such countries are also members of the boards of directors of many leading Russian state corporations (such as Gazprom or Rosneft). Well, what kind of opponents are they, huh? Who are you going to control the space from? From those who, if necessary, will simply come directly to the Kremlin and resolve all issues ?! It's funny to read about these superpower games and the imaginary confrontation, which in fact does not exist.
                      We have already lost a significant part of the Soviet military infrastructure on the territory of the former republics, and in Russia itself.
                      1. +7
                        25 August 2020 12: 18
                        And they almost lost Sevastopol. The agreement with Ukraine was ending! And Sevastopol is control over the Black Sea and coastal countries. The annexation of Crimea was not only forced, but also vital. The country's security came to the fore. Now we are building state capitalism, the features of which are becoming more and more apparent. I really hope that the times when Western emissaries dictated to us what to do and how to do it will gradually become a thing of the past. We must not lose Belarus. Yes, Lukashenka stayed too late, did not understand the requirements generated by new generations of people, the economy is slowing down and needs a fundamental restructuring. The same as ours. In interaction with ours. As for the ambassador, if we turn to the topic of the article, then his behavior does not correspond to the ethical standards of his profession.
                    2. +9
                      25 August 2020 12: 13
                      Good afternoon! Colleague, to whom do you crucify, explaining the obvious? It is clearly not worth it, since in front of you is the primary troll of Western registration. When the question of the Panama Canal was harshly posed to the Americans, they just flew there and smashed everything to hell, leaving a puppet there. Someone then "sang songs" in the West about democracy and human rights? So they needed it. All normul! And now suddenly there is such concern about our neighbors, which 90% of westerners cannot show on the map.
                    3. +1
                      25 August 2020 19: 03
                      Quote: depressant
                      (Radar "Volga"),

                      The Volga is duplicated and overlaps both in range and sector. In Moscow, the layouts have been calculated long ago ...
                  2. +4
                    25 August 2020 12: 22
                    Greenwood
                    and all of its former republics have been living their own lives for a long time and are not obliged to reckon with the opinion of their neighbors, no matter how offensive it may be to you.

                    Do you think that the Baltic countries live their own lives regardless of outside control?
                    People from Lithuania began to go to Poland to shop not because of the good life, tired of the tales of red Dali about the aggression of Russia (which, for some reason, never attacked them). That is, choosing the "European path" of development and completely turning away from Russia, the demographic issue deteriorated instantly, the standard of living is very far from the Benelux countries. In general, Latvia is lagging behind the EU in terms of economy. Almost 30 years have passed, why these countries, having embarked on the western rails of development, have not been able to break out into the first places in terms of economy, prosperity, and living standards in the EU?
                  3. 0
                    25 August 2020 17: 55
                    Not. Ideally, Belarus should decide. But I will immediately say my opinion based on my own experience. The people cannot decide anything. No offense. The crowd is a very irrational organism. Not only Belarusian ... any. I took part, saw the results, people of higher rank told how and where to get bali ... and so everywhere
              2. +6
                25 August 2020 09: 49
                Why do you decide for them ?!

                How parents decide for small children. Therefore.
                Someone else's uncle, a pervert and a pedophile, beckons you with candy from around the corner and you are being fooled.
                Although they heard and even saw (on TV) how it ends. And mom and dad told you.
                But the candy / cookie is here, just reach out and go around the corner.
                1. -7
                  25 August 2020 10: 05
                  Quote: Halpat
                  How parents decide for small children. Therefore.
                  Belarus is not small children, and Russia is not parents. The comparison is completely incorrect. These are two independent states. Each of them decides which way to go.
                  As for Russia, it itself is not in the best position, it is drowning in corruption and lawlessness. So it's not Russia to teach Belarus.
                  Quote: Halpat
                  You are someone else's uncle, a pervert and a pedophile
                  Are you starting tales about the evil West again? Not tired?
                  1. +7
                    25 August 2020 11: 05
                    Quote: Greenwood
                    Quote: Halpat
                    How parents decide for small children. Therefore.
                    Belarus is not small children, and Russia is not parents. The comparison is completely incorrect. These are two independent states. Each of them decides which way to go.
                    As for Russia, it itself is not in the best position, it is drowning in corruption and lawlessness. So it's not Russia to teach Belarus.
                    Quote: Halpat
                    You are someone else's uncle, a pervert and a pedophile
                    Are you starting tales about the evil West again? Not tired?

                    Hello ... New Year.
                    Is there a union treaty? There is.
                    Does Belarus sell most of its products in Russia? Yes.
                    Is there a CSTO? Yes.
                    Living conditions in Belarus are practically hothouse.
                    It is enough to look at the numbers. Investments, energy prices and much more.
                    Do you want to go to someone else's uncle and aunt?
                    Ukraine is gone, and it is much larger than Belarus. And it WAS much richer.
                    The result is visible - Belarusians are more than 2 times wealthier than Ukrainians, now. And this change has taken place over the past 7 years. Exactly from the moment of liberation it began.
                    Fed 404 tolerasts / perverts? Not.
                    Even lace panties can't buy now :)
                    Complete external control, absolutely shameless.
                    That with the Russians it was possible to wind, cuddle, extort / beg and GET for nothing.
                    And now only Russophobia is sold for currency, well, even sunflowers, and the Carpathian forest.
                    They wanted to get an investor (China) on Motorsich, so Uncle Sam poked and that's it. And the last one will fall apart.
                    Do you want it?
                    It is impossible for small countries in today's world to remain independent / multi-vector. You need to lean against the big ones and follow their course.
                    So it goes.
                    What you have to follow and what to endure with Uncle Sam is as clear as daylight. Is not it?
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. +1
                        25 August 2020 12: 06
                        Quote: Greenwood
                        Quote: Halpat
                        Is not it?
                        No, not so.
                        Quote: Halpat
                        Is there a union treaty? There is.
                        And what's the point of it for Russia? But Lukashenka, hiding behind this agreement, demanded preferences for himself all the time.
                        Quote: Halpat
                        Does Belarus sell most of its products in Russia? Yes.
                        Does Russia really need it?
                        Quote: Halpat
                        Living conditions in Belarus are practically hothouse.
                        Such hothouse, that Belarusians, like Ukrainians, go to work in Russia, and in the country itself, penny salaries. I hope this is not news to you.
                        Quote: Halpat
                        Do you want to go to someone else's uncle and aunt?
                        I'm not from Belarus, yes. You don't have to contact me.
                        Quote: Halpat
                        Fed 404 tolerasts / perverts? Not.
                        Even lace panties can't buy now :)
                        Complete external control, absolutely shameless.
                        One might think that something has radically changed in comparison with the times of Kuchma and Yushchenko, who sold everything left and right in the same way.
                        Quote: Halpat
                        You need to lean against the big ones and follow their course.
                        And who is "big"? Russia, which itself is drowning in corruption and lawlessness? Which has been divided by a handful of clans from Putin's entourage and is taking the grandmother over the hill? Russia itself has no course. Calm down, your super power games are ridiculous. Russia is not for it and does not represent an adequate force on the world stage with the standard of living of the Latin American banana republic.

                        Well then, go ahead for the lace panties.
                  2. +1
                    25 August 2020 18: 26
                    Quote: Greenwood
                    Belarus is not small children, and Russia is not parents. The comparison is completely incorrect. These are two independent states.

                    This is one union state. Point . The West in its last leap is trying to stop the inevitable integration of Russia and Belarus .. Gritting its teeth and howling from impotence. even on the VO website .. Under different nicknames. You, one of them - whine, growl and snarl.
              3. +3
                25 August 2020 17: 49
                Quote: Greenwood
                If Belarusians want to go to Europe, let them go.

                Another would be the Belarusians lived on another planet, then they would go as they please. But since they live next to us, Russia has its own interests here. And we do not need this game of democracy if tomorrow NATO missiles will look at us directly through the window.
              4. +4
                25 August 2020 18: 59
                Quote: Greenwood
                Albeit completely pro-Western. And if Belarusians would vote for her, then so be it.


                Russia cannot allow the formation of yet another checkered Ukraine on its border. I thought that even a hedgehog should understand this. RB enjoys the advantages of a transport hub - and you have to pay for everything. I hope at least now Lukashenka has been surrounded with flags and a bridle ...
                Now about Europe, as I understand it, to wash the toilets in Warsaw and now no one to interfere with the natives of Belarus. Unless you have to compete with ukrami. How much will the visa cost there - 60 euros as I remember?
              5. +3
                26 August 2020 04: 40
                That is, if Lithuania and Poland interfere in the internal affairs of Belarus, then this is normal. And if Russia interferes, then this is no, no. You will decide, gentlemen, liberals.
            2. -3
              25 August 2020 07: 33
              You know, LAG had no program before the election.
              He just said, I won't give up the power ... that's all.
            3. -3
              25 August 2020 07: 34
              Kuzya, why do you need Belarusians?
            4. -8
              25 August 2020 08: 33
              Where do you get this nonsense? Come to Minsk on Sunday, go out to the square and listen with your ears what the people want! Fair elections, release of political prisoners and punishment of those guilty of murder, torture and torture. All!!!
              1. +12
                25 August 2020 08: 41
                The main thing is not to be mistaken by the area)
                Otherwise, people want the opposite in different squares under different flags. Some work quietly in a peaceful and calm country, others change, freedom and fresh wind. The first is more, the second is more noticeable. As in any of the previous countries that have undergone the technology of the color revolution. Belarus is the sixteenth in this list since the beginning of the century. And all the same disabled people are taken to the thorn, the same flowers, the same threats to the families of the security forces, the same hugs. The grand piano has not yet played in the smoke of tires only.
                But in my opinion the Belarusians are a wise people and will resist, they will not lead to Polish cookies.
                1. -11
                  25 August 2020 08: 54
                  You first go out to these squares, and then hang up who has the majority! Luka has an unlimited resource in his hands: radio, television, administrative resources, watchdogs .... And we only have will. And we are the majority !!!
                  1. +8
                    25 August 2020 09: 20
                    Quote: EgorMinsk
                    And we only have will. And we are the majority !!!

                    At once we are baHato, we are not podolaty! We heard, we know, it turned out to be only 0,2%. Let's jump already, otherwise it's boring girls.
                    1. -11
                      25 August 2020 09: 36
                      Better to see once ...
                  2. 0
                    25 August 2020 14: 07
                    Even if there are 250000 of you as you broadcast yourself, let me remind you that 10 million live in the country. They have no time to Maidan, they need to feed their families
                  3. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
              2. +8
                25 August 2020 09: 18
                And what do some Kovalkova and Dylevsky, detained at the MTZ entrance, want? Probably, the welfare of the factory workers and increased productivity or stopping the enterprise to please the owners. There are few options and only one of them is correct. What do you like best?
            5. 0
              25 August 2020 18: 58
              Quote: Kot_Kuzya
              Quote: Greenwood
              Opposition candidates had programs

              What kind of programs? Recognition of modern Belarus as the heiress of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, not Rus, and, accordingly, the Belarusians are descendants of Lithuanians, not Russians. The prohibition of the Russian language in production and in educational institutions, entry into the EU and NATO, the introduction of a visa regime with the Russian Federation and visa-free travel with the EU, the abolition of duties on imports from the EU, the termination of trade with the Russian Federation. Somewhere it already happened ... Oh yes, exactly! In Ukraine in 2014, except that in Ukraine they chanted "Ukraine and Europe!", And then they chant "Belarus and Lithuania!"

              And there was a time when the ON was “Lithuanian Rus”, where everyone wrote and spoke in Russian. My ancestors are from there. They were quite Russian. And there was no "Lithuania" - "Lithuania" sat in the woods and was afraid to stick out his nose. If you study history through agitation, Belarusians have to go to the forest laughing
          3. +11
            25 August 2020 07: 35
            Of course, Russia knows better. "You can't see a face face to face. Great things are seen at a distance." Are the Belarusians really so stupid not to see what happened to Russia, Ukraine (I am not talking about geographically located countries). Further - the destruction of the country and it is too late to do something. The opposition (coordinating council) provided a program, which they had already rejected, said that a mistake had come out (in fact, a copy from the ukromaydan - one to one). There is no opposition there yet. Has not grown. Calves led by the handle (and tongue) by Poland and Lithuania are not the same size.
          4. +7
            25 August 2020 08: 56
            There should be an alternative to Lukashenka. Only not like in (in) Ukraine, where the times of Yanukovych are remembered with nostalgia.
            Our path of further survival is unification. The West, with its "pragmatic" (nothing personal, just business) approach is not for us.
            1. -4
              25 August 2020 10: 08
              Quote: BerBer
              Our path of further survival is unification.
              I completely agree with that. But where does Lukashenko, Putin and other unbelievable potentates have to do with it? There will be no unification with them.
              Quote: BerBer
              its "pragmatic" (nothing personal, just business)
              This is just the current approach.
              1. +2
                25 August 2020 10: 42
                I don’t like everything about VVP, but in general he is excited about Russei. But Lukashenko wants a monarchy and prepares the youngest Kolya for rule. Everyone has their own sins, and "Batka" has a thirst for power. Moreover, it is blind and all-embracing. Otherwise, this crisis would not have happened.
                1. -3
                  25 August 2020 12: 01
                  Quote: BerBer
                  but in general he cares about Russei
                  Both Putin and Lukashenka care only about their eternal power, hence the strengthening of the police apparatus and the reform of legislation and the constitution to please themselves. It's just that Lukashenka's political strategists work worse.
                  1. 0
                    25 August 2020 17: 56
                    Quote: Greenwood
                    hence the strengthening of the police apparatus and the reform of legislation and constitution to please themselves.

                    Bugagaga. Do you really think that Putin is doing this exclusively for himself? Always and everywhere the king, leader, president is the spokesman for the interests of the ruling class. Otherwise, it usually ends very quickly.
            2. -1
              25 August 2020 19: 06
              Quote: BerBer
              There should be an alternative to Lukashenka. Only not like in (in) Ukraine, where the times of Yanukovych are remembered with nostalgia.
              Our path of further survival is unification. The West, with its "pragmatic" (nothing personal, just business) approach is not for us.

              You are strange. In the Russian Federation, is it not so - nothing personal, just business? In order not to ruin what he has saved, Lukashenka is probably pulling with the Union State. And thanks to this, we are still enjoying Belarusian products here. As soon as our oligarchs enter Belarus, this will come to an end - all that remains is to eat the poison. No, I am for Belarusian products, I am for Lukashenka! drinks
              1. +1
                26 August 2020 08: 46
                The question is, either Belarus is with the "West" and against us, or with Russia. There are no other alternatives. Look at Ukraine. The West is not the owner there and they understand this, so they try to rob and destroy as much as possible and give us the ruins. This is a war, only it is going on in a different context. And the losses we incur (economic, demographic, etc.) are the result of the work of the West, not GDP. A lot is stopped and it is not known what the consequences would be if not the power.
                I think so stop
          5. +11
            25 August 2020 09: 18
            We saw your program. This is how one must hate the country, the people, the statehood in order to stand up for the implementation of this program: withdrawal from the union treaty with Russia, breaking the agreements within the CIS, total Belarusization with criminal responsibility for doubts about the existence of Bel. language as an independent., general privatization and sale of state. property, etc., etc. That is, the complete surrender of the country to global swindlers and fraudsters.
            1. +1
              25 August 2020 17: 57
              Well, according to the zmagarobots who flooded the site, the people want it. laughing
          6. 0
            28 August 2020 08: 34
            Opposition candidates had programs

            Are you talking about the programs that they tried to hide as much as possible later? About the break with the CSTO and Russia, the country's entry into NATO, the full border with Russia, the eviction of all Russian bases and the banning of TV channels, only one Belarusian state language in the country (despite the fact that the majority speaks Russian), etc.?

            Just do not need fairy tales that this was not the case, the Internet remembers everything, especially "web archives" and "Google cache". If you don’t understand what it is (and I’m too lazy to describe it), look here where to look https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQCwmtDpcbs.
        2. -18
          25 August 2020 07: 09
          Do you even understand what you wrote? Lozeng Zhive Belarus-fascist? Since when? You already see fascists everywhere. Valerianochki would like you to drink. Calm down.
          1. -11
            25 August 2020 07: 23
            These same people are the loudest here yelling about Putin's stability and "Russia keeps on Putin." Insanity grew stronger as they say.
            1. +16
              25 August 2020 08: 10
              And what did the oppas do useful for their state?
              Well, such that one could see, touch, eat in the end.
              I am "pleased" by the speculations about the scoop of juvenile ghouls who have not lived with him for a day.
              1. -3
                25 August 2020 10: 09
                Quote: adam khomich
                And what did the oppas do useful for their state?
                And what should have been done (especially without having a budget and authority)? Share.
                1. +2
                  25 August 2020 19: 12
                  From putting things in order in the courtyard of the house where I live, from organizing a subbotnik, From planting trees ... There is a lot that can be done, but ghouls are striving for higher power ...
          2. +1
            25 August 2020 17: 59
            Fascist, of course, because you are Nazis trying to play the card of radical nationalism.
        3. +1
          25 August 2020 11: 16
          Tell me, what about under Lukashenka? With wages in villages of $ 100 or at enterprises of $ 250. In Belarus, stagnation, enterprises have developed the Soviet potential. By the nature of my activity, I visit different enterprises. A lot of Belarusians travel to neighboring countries Poland, Lithuania, Latvia. The standard of living is not comparable. In the countryside, people drink themselves out of hope. Don't look at the beautiful painted facade.
        4. +1
          25 August 2020 14: 17
          Remind me, please, under what flag the Vlasovites fought in the Second World War?
          1. -1
            25 August 2020 18: 01
            White-red-white?
          2. +1
            25 August 2020 19: 13
            Andreevsky
        5. +1
          25 August 2020 18: 53
          Regrettably, but you must agree with you.
          It is quite obvious that those who "go to power" must present to their electorate a program for either a way out of the crisis, or a change in the course of economic policy.
          And their proposals will be carefully considered not by those who in their mass do not understand anything, but by seasoned specialists.
          And the fact is that experts will scrupulously calculate everything. And in the case of the "Panama", they will immediately be brought out "to clean water."
          If no flaws are found, then they can cheat. Fifty-fifty.

          There was an unshakable rule in the USSR.
          No one could appoint a young graduate director.
          Never!
          He had to go through all stages of career growth for several years. Get acquainted with the production. To master everything more or less important and necessary.
          First the foreman, then the shift foreman, then the deputy head of the shop, then the head of the shop, then either the deputy director or the deputy chief engineer.
          Here the roads diverged.
          If a specialist is more of an engineer, this is one way.
          If the administrator is different.
          The ascent went on in the same way along the party line.
          And through the Soviet executive bodies.

          The president of the country can be, ideally, one who has gone through everything, up to the branch minister. Or the minister of the political and power bloc.
          The one who knows the "inner kitchen" from the inside.

          A person from the street, getting into a new place, will be in the loop for a long time.
          And on his shoulders lies the responsibility for the fate of the people and the country.

          Which Tikhanovskaya is the President?
          But the people demanded changes.
          He doesn't care about all these my arguments.
          And then I remembered - I'll go as a director, let them teach me.

          Although she declared that if she was elected, she would resign in three months.
          And then let those who present programs and will be understood and approved by the people come to power.

          But it did not grow together.
          There is no chance.
        6. 0
          26 August 2020 16: 08
          The entire economic program of Zmagarya is to sever all relations with Russia. What the tongue-tied Tikhanovskaya pointed out in an interview with Meduza.
      2. +22
        25 August 2020 06: 01
        Let me ask you if this Leshchenya is so correct why did he initially go to the civil service to Lukashenka? or why did he not leave the civil service when he figured out that Lukashenka turns out to be a dictator and a tyrant? This is called a political prostitute, and most likely he was paid for these statements, this is not done for free
        1. +8
          25 August 2020 06: 04
          Quote: Graz
          It's called a political prostitute

          This one just galloped ahead of the locomotive, and the locomotive crushed him!
        2. +4
          25 August 2020 06: 42
          Read Lukashenka's biography carefully, and then tell me which of the current politicians is reliable. In 1990-1993, he declared about the usurpation of power, and the establishment of the dictatorship of the then leadership, was a member of the CPSU, then tore up his party membership card, joined some kind of party, something connected with freedom, demanded the ban of the CPSU. Sometimes he has interesting sayings, he was born in 1954, as you remember, but once he said that his father died in the Great Patriotic War. Looks like cryo-experiments have been carried out for a long time.
          1. +8
            25 August 2020 07: 25
            I would also add that one of Lukashenka's slogans in 1994 was “we will remove the old people from power”. It is significant that for 25 years he slipped into the same thing with which he initially fought. A vivid example of how power spoils a person.
            1. +4
              25 August 2020 09: 23
              Quote: Greenwood
              "Let's take the old people out of power."

              This slogan should be sent to the USA, otherwise there are clinical presidential candidates with a bunch of syndromes.
              1. -2
                25 August 2020 10: 12
                Over the past 25 years, the presidents in the United States have been - Clinton, Bush Jr., Obama, Trump. None of them clung to power, altered the constitution, or imprisoned political competitors. Each served two terms and resigned to pursue other projects. During the same time, the same Lukashenko has been in power in Belarus, and the same Putin has been in Russia for a little less time. This is normal?
                1. 0
                  26 August 2020 07: 33
                  Quote: Greenwood
                  Over the past 25 years, US presidents have been

                  In the United States, it is not individuals (presidents) who rule, but clans (parties) that do not differ from each other. This is the semblance of changeability, ersatz-democracy.
                2. 0
                  26 August 2020 08: 24
                  Quote: Greenwood
                  the same Putin has been in Russia for a little less time. This is normal?


                  And the problem is what? There is no particular sense in the appearance of the change of Power in the United States. Or rather it was not. What will happen now? Very interesting.
                3. 0
                  26 August 2020 21: 17
                  Quote: Greenwood
                  Over the past 25 years, the presidents in the United States have been - Clinton, Bush Jr., Obama, Trump. None of them clung to power, altered the constitution, or imprisoned political competitors. Each served two terms and resigned to pursue other projects. During the same time, the same Lukashenko has been in power in Belarus, and the same Putin has been in Russia for a little less time. This is normal?

                  And Bush Senior? Clinton beats with a hoof, wants to preziki. And how long does Merkel rule?
          2. -1
            25 August 2020 18: 03
            Quote: Free Wind
            he was born in 1954, as you remember, but one day he said that his father had died in the Great Patriotic War.

            And what bothers you?
            1. 0
              25 August 2020 18: 42
              It's okay, for ghouls. Only for you, it confuses me. I am addressing you to you.
              1. -1
                25 August 2020 18: 44
                And more specifically? What's wrong? Or do you liberals, a person cannot have a father, but only parent number 1?
                1. 0
                  25 August 2020 18: 51
                  father conceived a child 10 years ago. It's interesting, of course.
                  1. +1
                    25 August 2020 21: 07
                    Will there be proofs or will the gentlemen take each other's word? As far as I know, he only talked about his father that he didn't know nichrome about him.
        3. -3
          25 August 2020 06: 47
          Quote: Graz
          Let me ask you if this Leshchenya is so correct why did he initially go to the civil service to Lukashenka?
          So you ask him.
          My opinion is that a person is disillusioned with Lukashenka's policy, who has gone too far and has put himself above the law and above the state. This is unacceptable for a government official.
          1. +5
            25 August 2020 07: 52
            - Have mercy, Philip Philipovich, but if this Shvonder still processes him, what will come of him? My God, I am only now beginning to understand what can come out of our Sharikov! - Aha! Do you understand now? And I realized this ten days after the operation. (FROM)
        4. 0
          25 August 2020 19: 15
          Quote: Graz
          This is called a political prostitute, and most likely he was paid for these statements, this is not done for free


          Quite right. Slegonza was in a hurry only or didn't guess ...
      3. +7
        25 August 2020 07: 44
        Quote: Greenwood
        Quite to that. He bet on the Belarusian people. Lukashenkos come and go, but the Belarusian people remain.

        Sorry, but you don't speak for the people. But that Igor Leshchenko decided on the move from one train to another, that's for sure. Only both trains flew past Leshchenko. A person moving from one camp to another is called ...... "What do you think Lavrenty Pavlovich, what are they called?"
        1. -7
          25 August 2020 08: 47
          I once voted for Lukashenka, and after the 2010 "elections" I was completely disappointed in him. Today I am fighting for a tribunal against the usurper! And what should you call me?
          What to call people who believed in Stalin ...
          1. +5
            25 August 2020 09: 20
            And what should you call me?


            The most decent thing is the "naive revolutionary". If you took even a penny or even a pie from the "support fund", directly or indirectly - a traitor to the country. But in your heart you consider yourself "an ardent fighter for the happiness of the oppressed"
            You should save the blacks in Africa. There, neither the United States nor Russia will interfere with you. Because I don't care.
            1. -6
              25 August 2020 10: 01
              ))) So Russia is already in Africa and .. in all the holes is saving someone! There are no places))) Why are you not there yet?
          2. +1
            25 August 2020 09: 24
            Quote: EgorMinsk
            Today I am fighting for a tribunal against the usurper! And what should you call me?

            A person who believed in the Arab League, who did not justify the wishes of the voters.
          3. +1
            25 August 2020 09: 25
            Quote: EgorMinsk
            What to call people who believed in Stalin ...

            And what about the people who wrote denunciations of neighbors, friends and comrades?
          4. +5
            25 August 2020 09: 46
            Quote: EgorMinsk
            I once voted for Lukashenka, and after the 2010 "elections" I was completely disappointed in him. Today I am fighting for a tribunal against the usurper! And what should you call me?
            What to call people who believed in Stalin ...

            Why don't you like Stalin?
            For example, I like Stalin completely! And I fully respected and respect Stalin's services to the Soviet people in the development and protection of our country!

            And you, apparently, are from another political and economic camp? Are you a small private owner-entrepreneur of the modern NEP? This is called in political theory a bourgeoisized class "degenerate".

            1. -5
              25 August 2020 10: 09
              Yes, he was a very good man. Humanist)))
              1. +4
                25 August 2020 10: 32
                Quote: EgorMinsk
                Yes, he was a very good man. Humanist)))

                Yes. Stalin was precisely a humanist sovereign and patriot - he stood precisely for the people, and not for an irresponsible degenerating bureaucratic power nomenclature.

                But the TROTSKYIS in the party elite of the country until 1937-1938 were not "humanists" - they were pests.
                And if it were not for the "Stalinist" purges of 1937-1938, the USSR would have lost the Second World War to the West back in 1941, and not in 1991.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +3
                    25 August 2020 11: 02
                    Quote: EgorMinsk
                    Stalin, his murderers and you like me are disgusting.
                    So you revealed yourself - as the descendants of the unfinished Belarusian SS police battalions with their war crimes during the Second World War!
                    One destroyed Khatyn by people like you, what is it worth! But Khatyn was far from the only one in Soviet Belarus! Etc.
                    So shut up about "Stalinist humanism"! You yourself and others like you have a log in your eye.

                    Your anti-Lukashenski candidates are all as one - they are Belarusian Nazis and their flag is the flag of Belarusian Nazis. Namely.
                    In 1918, the Belarusian People's Republic was proclaimed in the territories that were under German occupation. It lasted only 9 months, but it had a flag. White-red-white.
                    Later, during the Second World War, the Belarusian SS police battalions fought under this flag. It was approved for use by the Reichskommissariat Ostland on 27.07.1942/XNUMX/XNUMX. in the territory of the general district of Belarus.
                    After the collapse of the USSR, for 4 years this flag was the official flag of the Republic of Belarus. After Lukashenko came to power, Alexander Grigorievich initiated a referendum. 4 questions were brought up for general discussion:
                    - the status of the Russian language as a state language,
                    - change of state symbols,
                    - amendments to the Constitution,
                    - integration of the economy with Russia.
                    It was then that this flag ceased to be a state symbol, and Belarus acquired the state flag that we now know.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. +2
                        25 August 2020 11: 38
                        Quote: Kunashir 1976
                        You can also recall that General Vlasov fought under the tricolor.
                        He fought. But the Russian flag, under which Vlasov fought, was originally sovereign imperial and not colonial, like your white-red-white. Namely.

                        Our Russian flag was not originally created with the permission of any invaders - it is really a SOUTHERN Russian flag, which is historically several hundred years old. For the Russian Federation, this is the flag of the FREE Russian Empire.
                        And the fact that Vlasov used him, so under his lousy treacherous task of serving Germany - he would have been in his ranks of the struggle against Soviet Russia for the liberation of the Russian Empire from the Bolshevik "occupation" of all kinds of "White Guards".

                        And your Belarusian white-red-white flag was the flag of the Belarusians colonized by the Germans under the external control of Germany - the enemy of the same Belarusians - and in fact remains the same flag symbol. And you, Belarusians of Antlukoshenka, are moving under this BCHB flag to return from FREEDOM in the direction of a new OCCUPATION by the West - that is, in turning your country back into a COLONY of the West.

                        Do you feel the difference in the tasks of the Tikhanovskaya team, which is now in Lithuania, in the GEOPOLITICAL treacherous tasks for R. Belarus?
                      2. -4
                        25 August 2020 13: 25
                        Was everyone in the FREE Russian Empire FREE? Weren't the serfs there? What kind of freedom are you talking about? Yes, there was no external occupation rule. But, in excess of their occupiers were enough. A good and zealous owner cannot do this to his people. And if he did, he was completely stupid or didn't care about his aspirations.
                      3. +2
                        25 August 2020 13: 37
                        Quote: Sentry73
                        Was everyone in the FREE Russian Empire FREE? Weren't the serfs there? What kind of freedom are you talking about?

                        Do not engage in demagoguery! This is not about the estates, but about the colonization and sovereign independence of the whole country.
                        In a colonized country, in comparison with a titular national-power - a self-sufficient-free country, the workers in a colonized country with external control experience DOUBLE oppression - i.e. not only from our own internal oppressors, but from external oppressors-parasites - from foreign conquerors and oppressors.
                      4. The comment was deleted.
                      5. +1
                        25 August 2020 14: 28
                        About the President of the Russian Federation, Putin, choose the DEEPER expression! He is still the head of state.
                    2. +1
                      25 August 2020 13: 37
                      Grandfather Alexander went to the front on June 28, 41. Demobilized from injury in 1944.
                      Grandfather Peter went to the front in 1941. He was captured near Kiev and fled. He fought in a partisan detachment, was seriously wounded and was again taken prisoner. Until the end of the war he was in a camp in Austria. Liberated by British troops in 1945. Until 1947 he was in a filtration camp near Arkhangelsk.
                      My grandmother, mother and her sisters spent the entire occupation in their house on Krasivaya Street in Minsk, next to the railway station. We survived all the bombing.
                      This is whose descendant I am.
                      Both collaborators and partisans fought under the BCHB flag. The history of the flag does not begin in 1918.
                      And what flag is flying over you? Don't want to remember ???
                      1. 0
                        25 August 2020 13: 53
                        Quote: EgorMinsk
                        This is whose descendant I am.

                        President of Ukraine Zelensky is also a descendant of his heroic, either Soviet grandfather, or Soviet father, even visited their grave. However, this did not prevent him from becoming a defector to the camp of inveterate Bandera and transferring all the Ukrainian assets of Soviet Ukraine that remained after Poroshenko to the West and serve the United States.
                        Quote: EgorMinsk
                        Both collaborators and partisans fought under the BCHB flag. The history of the flag does not begin in 1918.

                        The colors of the BCHB-flag of the Belarusian National Republic in 1918 are the result of imitation of the commitment to polonize the consciousness of the population of Western Belarus since the times of the Commonwealth.
                      2. +1
                        25 August 2020 18: 13
                        Quote: EgorMinsk
                        Both collaborators and partisans fought under the BCHB flag. The history of the flag does not begin in 1918.
                        And what flag is flying over you? Don't want to remember ???

                        Again the same story. Already tired of heartburn. You are all Natsik like a blueprint. The same shit in fact, albeit in a different package.
                      3. -1
                        25 August 2020 18: 32
                        If we are Nazis, then who are you? declaring a desire to kill all the unwanted?
                      4. 0
                        25 August 2020 18: 46
                        The greatest humanist of all times and peoples. For if you are not destroyed, oceans of blood of good people will pour out. And why should I feel sorry for you fascists?
                      5. -3
                        25 August 2020 19: 03
                        You are a sick person. Mentally ill. I hope you have no children.
                      6. +1
                        25 August 2020 21: 15
                        That is, you are talking nonsense, and am I sick? You are definitely sick Nazis. This is in addition to being utterly deceitful.
              2. +1
                25 August 2020 18: 09
                Really humanist. The longer I live, the more I want to gather all of you in a crowd of Natsiks, liberals, adherents of correct capitalism, bureaucrats and other greedy, arrogant, hypocritical, stupid scum to take you on a barge deeper and drown to cheerful music.
                1. -4
                  25 August 2020 18: 20
                  Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
                  Really humanist. The longer I live, the more I want to gather all of you in a crowd of Natsiks, liberals, adherents of correct capitalism, bureaucrats and other greedy, arrogant, hypocritical, stupid scum to take you on a barge deeper and drown to cheerful music.

                  And this person calls someone a fascist))))
                  1. 0
                    25 August 2020 18: 40
                    So I'm not on a national basis. And purely based on the good of humanity. So by the zmagarchik.
                    1. -3
                      25 August 2020 19: 01
                      On natspriznakunazizm (a form of fascism), and you are a fascist. See the difference? I think the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation has an article for you!))).
                      1. -1
                        25 August 2020 21: 10
                        You, as always, plainly stupidly lie to the Nazi.
      4. +2
        25 August 2020 08: 26
        Quote: Greenwood
        Quite to that. He bet on the Belarusian people. Lukashenkos come and go, but the Belarusian people remain.

        People, this is certainly good. Here are just a people without a leader, like a flock of sheep without a shepherd. does not know where, why and at what speed to go. And if the shepherd is replaced by a ram or an intruder, then the result will not be slow to affect. Ukraine is an example for you.
        Or you do not know how to learn from other people's mistakes, which were made by the people of Ukraine?
        1. -4
          25 August 2020 10: 16
          Quote: Krasnoyarsk
          Here are just a people without a leader, like a flock of sheep without a shepherd. does not know where, why and at what speed to go.
          Nobody says that there should not be a leader. It should be. But, in order to prevent nepotism and corruption, it must be regularly changed. That's the question. And in the vastness of the former USSR, unfortunately, the situation has developed that once former members of the CPSU and other minor leaders who have taken office are turning into tsars-princes who have been in power for decades, diligently eliminating any political competitors that appear on the horizon, fighting dissent, spreading rot on the opposition, and for some reason sincerely considering their country as their personal possession with a handful of slaves.
      5. +2
        25 August 2020 09: 18
        Quote: Greenwood
        He put on the Belarusian people

        laughing laughing laughing
      6. +1
        25 August 2020 10: 07
        Quote: Greenwood
        Lukashenkos come and go, but the Belarusian people remain.

        The question is, what kind of economy remains? Before Maidan or after Maidan?
    2. -2
      25 August 2020 07: 18
      What can I say ... I knew what fate awaited people who suddenly decided to become honest and decent.
      1. +2
        25 August 2020 07: 46
        Quote: Civil
        suddenly decided to become honest and decent.

        or a traitor.
      2. 0
        25 August 2020 08: 29
        Quote: Civil
        What can I say ... I knew what fate awaited people who suddenly decided to become honest and decent.

        Honesty is not insurance against stupidity.
    3. +4
      25 August 2020 08: 25
      Bet on the wrong horse ..

      Yes. Hastened to change shoes.
      Now, apparently from Slovakia, he will wait for how everything will end
  2. +5
    25 August 2020 05: 47
    "He flew away! But he promised to return. Dear ... darling ..." (c) from m / f "Kid and Carlson"

    To return or not ... to be or not to be ... to sit or not to sit ... a difficult question winked
    1. -2
      25 August 2020 07: 47
      Quote: Coco
      to be or not to be ... to sit or not to sit ... the question is difficult

      "Try, not torture."
  3. -7
    25 August 2020 06: 10
    In general, the usurpation of power, as well as the obscenity of such a law, when it is not the Foreign Ministry, but the bow, who decides who and where to be the ambassador, is obvious. I have no doubt that for the ambassador, now formerly his decision to support the opposition, it will end very badly, perhaps he will simply "disappear without a trace"!
    1. +1
      25 August 2020 08: 00
      No need to carry nonsense in the morning.
      Have pity on yourself and members of the forum.
  4. +4
    25 August 2020 06: 16
    Leshchenya previously stated that after his resignation he intends to return from Bratislava to Minsk

    On Abrams, obviously ...
    1. -2
      25 August 2020 07: 51
      Quote: Angelo Provolone
      On Abrams, obviously ...

      I do remember. In the early 90s I had a Polish Abrams on four wheels - "Polonaise" was called. No, you can't get from Bratislava to Minsk on it, I didn't go further than the city.
  5. +7
    25 August 2020 06: 26
    there is no information that Leshchenya returned to Belarus
    And most likely it won't. Will wait for how it will end. And when he realizes that the coordinating council has failed, he will ask for political asylum in the same Slovakia for issuing diplomatic secrets and information about the possible work of Belarusian intelligence in this country. For the first time, enough for living (surviving).
    1. 0
      25 August 2020 07: 54
      Quote: rotmistr60
      For the first time, enough for living (surviving).

      Lukashenka graduated from the pedagogical institute and did not forget about the Mercador ice ax.
  6. +3
    25 August 2020 06: 32
    Of course I must return to Minsk, I think his deputy. from the KGB will control the return process, otherwise you never know.
  7. +6
    25 August 2020 07: 36
    Almost anecdote. Protestors at the residence of the President of Belarus.
    Lukashenko, come out!
    Out. "What do you want"?
    Lukashenka go away!
    Went back to his residence.
  8. -16
    25 August 2020 07: 44
    Kremlebots here on VO DO NOT RESPECT THE BELARUSIAN PEOPLE, almost all the comments against the people of Belarus, for torture in prisons and violence, the people of Belarus deserve to live at least as in Russia as they break people in concentration camps to Lukashesk https://youtu.be/SqKotztzZnU Here is type 4 million Views
    1. +3
      25 August 2020 09: 20
      Quote: boomboom
      against the people of Belarus,

      laughing
      Quote: boomboom
      for torture in prisons and violence

      laughing laughing laughing
      1. +2
        25 August 2020 10: 09
        Quote: Paranoid50
        Quote: boomboom
        against the people of Belarus,

        laughing
        Quote: boomboom
        for torture in prisons and violence

        laughing laughing laughing

        That's it Yes
    2. +2
      25 August 2020 10: 20
      Quote: boomboom
      Kremlebots here on VO DO NOT RESPECT THE BELARUSIAN PEOPLE, almost all the comments against the people of Belarus, for torture in prisons and violence, the people of Belarus deserve to live at least as in Russia as they break people in concentration camps to Lukashesk https://youtu.be/SqKotztzZnU Here is type 4 million Views

      - We, Russians, are sincerely for the Belarusian people and for the fraternal Republic of Belarus!
      - We do not want for you, for the Russian Belarusians, a Russophobic pro-Western fate of apartheid and genocide against Russians, as in Russophobic Ukraine. If you don't understand this.
      - We do not want you with the whole country - the whole Republic of Belarus - to become a shameful colony of the West, namely, a colony of the United States through the polonization of Belarusians by Poland and Lithuania.
      “If at the same time you don’t see your own destiny, you are zombified and politically blinded, then we sincerely explain to you that the fate of fascist Ukraine awaits you.
      1. -1
        25 August 2020 11: 28
        Stop watching Skobeeva and Solovyov, they are toxic, you will not earn brain cancer in the drug. The Belarusian opposition does not oppose a break with Russia. And they stand for honest, balanced, constructive and equal relations. Not so long ago, many on this resource shouted that Lukashenka changed his shoes towards the west and endlessly milked Russia, he has always been a political prostitute. And now he has become a murderer and tormentor of his own people. Belarusians will not forgive him for this.
        1. +1
          25 August 2020 11: 46
          Quote: Kunashir 1976
          The Belarusian opposition does not oppose a break with Russia. And they stand for honest, balanced, constructive and equal relations.

          Here is what hung on the official website of Tikhanovskaya until August 18, 2020: https://web.archive.org/web/20200817014257/http://reformby.com/be/2020/06/12/security/ (at Belarusian).
          She has already deleted it (and now she is lying that she has nothing against Russia), but the cache remembers everything. And by the link you can see for yourself. All this is called "Reanimation package of reforms for Belarus".

          What was published on the site http://zabelarus.com/ru/2020/06/25/security-2/ (cache). I quote only a few points:
          1. In the political sphere:
          - Withdrawal from the "Union State", the Eurasian Union, the Customs Union and other integration entities dominated by Russia;
          a ban on pro-Russian organizations whose activities are contrary to national interests, as well as Russian funds and organizations that finance such structures;
          - Introduction of criminal liability for public statements that dispute the existence of a separate Belarusian nation and / or its historical right to its own state.
          - Introduction of criminal liability for public insults of the Belarusian language;
          - Monitoring by civil society of the activities of pro-Kremlin initiatives in Belarus;
          - Implementation of border and customs control on the border with Russia
          2. In the economic sphere. Ban on the sale of Belarusian infrastructure facilities to Russian companies.
          3. In the information sphere:
          Liberation of independent media from pressure and control from the state, ensuring freedom of the media and freedom of speech in Belarus;
          Banning the broadcasting of journalistic, socio-political and news programs created by Russian TV channels in Belarus;
          Inclusion in the standard TV package of compulsory public TV channels in Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.
          4. In the military sphere:
          Withdrawal from the CSTO, the return of full control of Belarus over its anti-aircraft and anti-missile defense systems;
          Removal of Russian military facilities from the territory of Belarus - a communications center in Vileika and a radar station near Baranovichi;
          Translation of educational work in the army into Belarusian;

          Long-term goals (until 2030)
          - Creation of a cross-cutting education system in the Belarusian language from kindergartens to universities;
          - Restoration of the Belarusian Autocephalous Orthodox Church as a national alternative to the Belarusian Exarchate of the Russian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate;
          - Fulfillment by Belarus of all criteria for membership in the European Union and NATO, submission of relevant applications for membership in these structures.
          See in detail - "Why is Svetlana Tikhanovskaya an enemy of Russia and Belarus? Evidence" - https://zen.yandex.ru/media/zapisi_na_poljah/pochemu-svetlana-tihanovskaia-vrag-rossii-i-belarusi-dokazatelstva-5f3cfa466d86cb29cad37ce6
      2. -1
        25 August 2020 11: 42
        Quote: Tatiana
        We, Russians, are sincerely for the Belarusian people and for the fraternal Republic of Belarus!
        Therefore, we will support the presumptuous king, who believes that the whole country rests on him alone.
        Quote: Tatiana
        We do not want for you, for the Russian Belarusians, a Russophobic pro-Western fate of apartheid and genocide against Russians, as in Russophobic Ukraine.
        Judging by how Russia treats the Russians who remained abroad, how "willingly" it gives them citizenship, and judging by the rate of decline of the Russian population in Russia itself, we are not far away ...
        Quote: Tatiana
        became the infamous colony of the West, namely the US colony
        Russia after 1991, in fact, is what it is, no matter how propagandists from Channel 1 try to assure you of the opposite, who also have citizenship and residence permits in those same Western countries.
    3. 0
      26 August 2020 02: 20
      Quote: boomboom
      https://youtu.be/SqKotztzZnU

      The stuff is really interesting and important. But on "VO" there are only videos from YouTube.
      Here is the link you need - https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=SqKotztzZnU&feature=emb_logo

      Belarus / How people are broken in prisons / My Arrest and Prison / The People + [ENG SUBS]
      • 14 Aug 2020


      And here is another point of view of a Belarusian from the Republic of Belarus.
      Compare - analyze who is who and why everything is so, and not otherwise!

      BELARUSSIA - AUGUST 25: The failure of Sunday's protests took the last trump cards from the "opposition" • 25 Aug. 2020
    4. The comment was deleted.
  9. +5
    25 August 2020 07: 59
    Quote: Skalendarka
    You know, LAG had no program before the election.
    He just said, I won't give up the power ... that's all.

    Lies, the program was published on his website and announced in the message ...
  10. +3
    25 August 2020 08: 02
    Quote: Thrifty
    In general, the usurpation of power, as well as the obscenity of such a law, when it is not the Foreign Ministry, but the bow, who decides who and where to be the ambassador, is obvious. I have no doubt that for the ambassador, now formerly his decision to support the opposition, it will end very badly, perhaps he will simply "disappear without a trace"!

    You, who know a lot, ask what military rank corresponds to the title of ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary in Russia and the Republic of Belarus and its status. And then crow ...
    1. +2
      25 August 2020 08: 55
      In self-respecting countries, the Foreign Ministry represents the diplomat, and the head of state approves both the appointment and resignation.
  11. +3
    25 August 2020 08: 38
    Bad ambassador. Doesn't know how to correctly assess the situation. winked
  12. +1
    25 August 2020 08: 48
    Luke "bothers" for the coronavirus .. then the fools said in Russia, they are afraid of this virus, they do everything wrong. He himself, they say, had been ill, did not notice! The Belarusians, too, with the quality mark, do not notice the crown ... And Russia is quarantine, the borders were closed by a bad, stupid ... and now with the village of Vova is discussing the tests of the Russian vaccine, probably again reminded that we are a union state and one people, and once one people and one state, then why count money - to waste time on trifles .., it is not accepted by relatives .... give me the vaccine! A hypocrite and a scoundrel ...
  13. +1
    25 August 2020 09: 14
    Leshchenya probably already saw himself as the Minister of Foreign Affairs under the new government ...
  14. +4
    25 August 2020 09: 17
    Quote: Greenwood
    Quite to that. He bet on the Belarusian people. Lukashenkos come and go, but the Belarusian people remain.

    On a part of the people, many like to speak for everyone, you are not the Lord God, after all.
  15. +1
    25 August 2020 09: 22
    Quote: EgorMinsk
    Where do you get this nonsense? Come to Minsk on Sunday, go out to the square and listen with your ears what the people want! Fair elections, release of political prisoners and punishment of those guilty of murder, torture and torture. All!!!

    That is, the parts of themselves that tried to burn, maim the police?
  16. +1
    25 August 2020 09: 27
    Quote: Victor_B
    Quote: Graz
    It's called a political prostitute

    This one just galloped ahead of the locomotive, and the locomotive crushed him!

    It doesn't happen just like that, there was a cookie, a position in the new government or a grant.
  17. +1
    25 August 2020 09: 31
    Quote: EgorMinsk
    I once voted for Lukashenka, and after the 2010 "elections" I was completely disappointed in him. Today I am fighting for a tribunal against the usurper! And what should you call me?
    What to call people who believed in Stalin ...

    Not a far-sighted person. If Lukashenko leaves, he will come to the revolutionary one, much worse. The concept of a socially oriented state will cause you a bitter smile.
    The last thing about Stalin is not clear, what did you ask?
    1. 0
      25 August 2020 18: 19
      Quote: ALSur
      The last thing about Stalin is not clear, what did you ask?

      This is another shot personally by Stalin.
  18. +2
    25 August 2020 10: 21
    It was necessary to praise, return to the country and imprison for treason for 15 years ...
  19. +3
    25 August 2020 14: 29
    There was such a patriot Andrew visor. Do you remember this one? Now he lives in the USA. Draw conclusions
    1. 0
      25 August 2020 14: 32
      Strange, even literary words are being cut out, the language of Chekhov and Pushkin
    2. +1
      25 August 2020 17: 32
      Quote: notingem
      There was such a patriot Andrew visor. Do you remember this one? Now he lives in the USA. Draw conclusions

      But who does not remember him andryushka YES .. Judas lives and conscience does not torment him along with Bakatin.
  20. +1
    25 August 2020 17: 28
    The traitors got out of their guises ..! Now you can see who is worth what and who is serving ..
  21. 0
    25 August 2020 20: 03
    Quote: prative dude
    so far the British have produced evidence. which was confirmed by the photo of Petrov and Bashirov
    I advise you to re-read if your memory is short


    Since you have a very short memory, I will explain - the stay of 2 tourists of Russian origin in the same town that Skripal lived in does not mean anything at all. And since Mr. Skripal managed to serve his time, it is quite obvious that he was completely uninteresting as an object of the action. But Berezovsky and Litvinenko were really soaked by the British and to this day silence ... Skripal was not killed, but these two were killed. Conclusion - a pseudo-assault on Skripal staged. Moreover, stupid ...