Manturov called the terms of adoption of the T-14 "Armata" tank

64
Manturov called the terms of adoption of the T-14 "Armata" tank

The newest T-14 tank on the Armata platform will be adopted by the Russian armed forces late this - early next year. The head of the Ministry of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov said this in an interview with the Zvezda TV channel.

According to Manturov, the adoption tank T-14 for service depends on state tests. At the present time, he said, there are many export applications for the tank and customers are monitoring the progress of the tank's tests.



We expect that upon completion of the state tests, in the near future the Ministry of Defense will adopt it. Everything, of course, depends on state tests. It seems to me that this will happen before the end of this year - at the beginning of next year.

- he added.

At the same time, the general director of Rosoboronexport, Alexander Mikheev, said that there are no export orders for the T-14 Armata tank yet, and technical consultations are underway with potential customers.

We provide technical advice. Applications - this is when the partner has already formed a budget, formed, one or another platform is built into the program for supporting the armed forces

- he said.

Let us remind you that in April this year Denis Manturov said in an interview with the Rossiya 1 TV company that the T-14 Armata tank would be exported and that its export appearance was being determined. However, the supply of the tank to potential buyers will begin only after all obligations for the supply of "Armata" to the Russian army are fulfilled.

In June, Interfax, citing its own source, said that Armata had already received an export passport.

Recall that the Ministry of Defense until the end of 2021 should receive 132 T-14 tanks and BMP T-15 on the Armata platform.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    64 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +18
      23 August 2020 15: 08
      Manturov called the terms of adoption of the T-14 "Armata" tank
      How many times? Is it the last .....
      1. +14
        23 August 2020 15: 11
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Manturov called the terms of adoption of the T-14 "Armata" tank
        How many times? Is it the last .....

        Articles with similar headings appear on VO with enviable regularity (about once a month). I wonder if anyone else believes them?
        1. +8
          23 August 2020 15: 16
          I do not understand at all how Manturov's attitude to the "Armata" is, and even more so to its adoption?
          1. -4
            23 August 2020 15: 40
            Quote: Varyag_0711
            I do not understand at all how Manturov's attitude to the "Armata" is, and even more so to its adoption?
            How what? While we are marching under the mercantile tricolor, the head of the Ministry of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov will be the main one in state affairs. request Alas for us.
          2. +5
            23 August 2020 15: 45
            The federal executive body of Russia, performing the functions of developing state policy and legal regulation in the field of the industrial and military-industrial complex, as well as in the development of aviation technology, technical regulation and ensuring the uniformity of measurements, as well as the functions of the authorized federal executive body, carrying out state regulation of foreign trade. Created May 12, 2008; in April - September 1998 there was an agency with the same name and similar powers.
        2. -8
          23 August 2020 15: 56
          I believe!
          And also in aliens, the Loch Ness monster, Bigfoot and the fact that gnomes live in the closet!
      2. -21
        23 August 2020 15: 13
        Here, some still believe that the military-industrial complex exists and do not agree that it does not exist. There is something for sure: PVC.
      3. -5
        23 August 2020 15: 24
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Manturov called the terms of adoption of the T-14 "Armata" tank
        How many times? Is it the last .....

        And earlier, someone said, wrote that in 2020 there will be 2 of them in the army.
        We all know the saying - "They wait for the promised 3 years."
        1. +7
          23 August 2020 15: 55
          It's one thing when the OBS (One Grandma Said), the other is when the responsible persons declare this! I would apply the article of the Criminal Code - "For nonsense" to these "responsible persons" who love to rub their tongues! Up to 5 years (for example) with the deprivation of the right to hold positions in State structures! negative
          1. 0
            23 August 2020 16: 16
            Quote: senima56
            loving to flutter his tongue, I would apply the article of the Criminal Code - "For nonsense"! Up to 5 years (for example)

            Usually they like to rub their tongues before elections, and when they are eventually won, they get those same 5 years lol Yes
          2. 0
            23 August 2020 17: 09
            Quote: senima56
            I would apply the article of the Criminal Code - "For nonsense" to these "responsible persons" who love to rub their tongues! Up to 5 years (for example) with the deprivation of the right to hold positions in State structures!

            Oh, I'm worried about you, no matter what happens recourse , some people argued that they would not change the retirement age and the Constitution, you, this, take care of yourself, times are troubled sad
          3. Alf
            +1
            23 August 2020 21: 51
            Quote: senima56
            Up to 5 years (for example) with the deprivation of the right to hold positions in State structures!

            Then now the State structures would be empty ...
        2. 0
          30 August 2020 19: 45
          Quote: Starover_Z
          And earlier, someone said, wrote that in 2020 there will be 2 of them in the army.
          The funds intended for the large-scale production of the T-14 were distributed in other priority areas. Tank is not a priority, because we have a lot of combat-ready tanks in our troops. Obviously, the funds were spent on finishing ... no, not the budget. For finishing hypersonic missiles, the Poseidon submarine and other new products. In addition, if one of the officials or general directors of factories voices wishes that are unofficially hovering on the sidelines of departments, at exhibitions and forums, this does NOT mean that the planned decision of the Ministry of Defense has already been made and is included in the state defense order program. This must be clearly understood. Perhaps no plans for 2500. "Armata" was not originally.
      4. -3
        23 August 2020 15: 46
        into a regular one. everything was always said more than concretely about the course of tests.
      5. +3
        23 August 2020 15: 48
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        How many times? Is it the last .....

        ========
        As it will be "brought to mind" - So it will go straight to the troops!
        Too much expensive machine to throw into the troops "not brought to mind" !!! Wrong situation!
        PS I would like to see quickly! But not due to the "loss in QUALITY" !!!
        soldier
      6. +1
        23 August 2020 16: 10
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Is the last

        The variant of "dizziness from success" is also possible:
        Как it seems to me, this will happen before the end of this year - at the beginning of next year
      7. +6
        23 August 2020 16: 21
        The road to Hell is actually not one, there are two. The first is paved with good intentions, while the other is paved with government promises. (c)
      8. +1
        23 August 2020 20: 20
        However, the supply of the tank to potential buyers will begin only after all obligations for the supply of "Armata" to the Russian army are fulfilled.

        And what kind of obligations? 2300 pieces, I hope?
    2. +5
      23 August 2020 15: 09
      Still not accepted? So the next promise was announced ... Once in the 4th, in my memory ...
      1. -7
        23 August 2020 15: 47
        a lot of technology in its lifetime through tests carried out to declare with such fanfare? laurels 64 I see here do not give rest to many right?
        1. -1
          23 August 2020 16: 36
          Why are you interested? Who do you work for? Do they pay a lot?))))

          Only here there have already been 3 times similar news.
          + 2 times that supplies to the troops have already begun.

          Someone, it turns out, is purposefully lying ...
          1. -2
            23 August 2020 16: 41
            they would generally be different in essence. you just have to read carefully.
            1. 0
              23 August 2020 19: 45
              Yeah. And also to take notes ....)))

              Here Manturov, there is someone else ... you have to sit with a magnifying glass and compare ..)))
          2. 0
            24 August 2020 03: 56
            Quote: Alex2000
            Only here there have already been 3 times similar news.
            + 2 times that supplies to the troops have already begun.
            Deliveries to the troops for trial operation have begun. Can you read? Or was something else written?
            2300 tanks wanted to order TOTAL (with a possible subsequent increase in quantity), and not until 2020. Are there other versions of the official statements? So you provide a reference.
            1. +1
              24 August 2020 06: 30
              https://www.vpk-news.ru/news/32237
              The whole director of UVK in 2016 reported that he had begun deliveries to the troops. By 2025, it will deliver 2300 units. There are 4 years left, you need to collect 575 pieces a year, or it turns out that you screwed up ...
              1. 0
                24 August 2020 19: 11
                Quote: Victor67
                There are 4 years left, you need to collect 575 pieces a year, or it turns out that you screwed up ...
                It is easy for him to shake off: how much they paid, they did so much.
                When the military tried to use the atomic boNbu, they resisted for some time, because could not fit into tactics and strategy.
                I think that the military now does not understand where and how to build this tank - it is too different. It seems like an ordinary tank, but it seems not a tank, or not an ordinary one.
            2. 0
              24 August 2020 23: 17
              Can you read?
              "Deliveries to the troops for trial operation have begun" - this is not the case in this article.
              But in some others, I remember, there were.
              2300 is some kind of old promise. It seems that at first they promised 2000 by the 20th year, then sometimes 200, then "14 first." Surely there was still something, I am not making notes on the promises.
    3. +5
      23 August 2020 15: 15
      Adoption does not mean entering the troops.
      1. +1
        23 August 2020 15: 44
        Quote: Alex_You
        Adoption does not mean entering the troops.

        Quite right. The question of mass production should be, and not about the supply of another battalion of tanks every 2 years. By the way, "132 T-14 tanks and T-15 infantry fighting vehicles", I really want to ask my mother: where is your shred, and where is mine. request
        1. -6
          23 August 2020 16: 27
          Quote: Mavrikiy
          where is your shred, and where is mine

          In 2015, Vyacheslav Khalitov, deputy general director of NPK Uralvagonzavod, said that a billion rubles were spent on the development of the Armata in 2014. If we assume that the spending was stable, then 6 billion rubles were spent in 6 years, hence 6 billion / 134 tanks and we get +45 million rubles. totally agree development of each of 134 tanks excluding the cost of "hardware" and overhead costs.
          Therefore, answering your question, I would like to answer with the saying "from a black sheep, even a tuft of wool" (if only to wait for entry into the troops) Yes
          1. +1
            23 August 2020 21: 59
            If a cure for cancer is invented and spends a bunch of rubles on it and the pill will cost 1 ruble ... will you also smear the development on each pill?
        2. -3
          24 August 2020 03: 57
          Quote: Mavrikiy
          The question of mass production should be, and not about the supply of another battalion of tanks every 2 years.
          You will be then whiningthat the tanks in the series went raw and there is a cut to modernize the new machine.
    4. +3
      23 August 2020 15: 20
      In response, the T-14 said that the timing of the end of Manturov's long internship in his post was unknown.
    5. -1
      23 August 2020 15: 32
      Quote: Piramidon
      Articles with similar headings appear on VO with enviable regularity (about once a month).

      Well, there are 4 months left until the end of the year, they should not fail in terms of time.
      132 T-14 tanks and T-15 BMPs
      Tank battalion? It will not be enough for "put into service". So it remains an experiment. crying
      Although from 19.11.19/14/2019 the statement: The first batch of the latest T-2020 "Armata" tanks will enter the Russian Armed Forces in late XNUMX - early XNUMX.
      The new T-14 Armata tank will enter service with the troops of the Central Military District after 2021. This was announced by the commander of the military district, Colonel-General Alexander Lapin. By 2022, the troops should receive 100 tanks. After that, a decision will be made on the mass production of machines.
      1. -3
        23 August 2020 15: 40
        conceptually they still need to be entered. it will take a long time.
    6. -2
      23 August 2020 16: 06
      this will happen before the end of this year - at the beginning of next year
      as the elections were, so they experienced in Syria ............... It can be seen that threatens the rating, sho so everyone was startled
      1. -1
        23 August 2020 16: 09
        What the hell is the rating?
    7. -2
      23 August 2020 16: 13
      Recall that the Ministry of Defense until the end of 2021 should receive 132 T-14 tanks and BMP T-15 on the Armata platform.

      Something strange set of information. The tank has not yet been adopted for service, and the deliveries were announced for 100 units. It is also necessary to set up serial production, they will again postpone
    8. +3
      23 August 2020 16: 45
      Manturov is the same bol as Rogozin. to believe such people - not to respect yourself
    9. 0
      23 August 2020 17: 06
      The newest T-14 tank on the Armata platform will be adopted by the Russian armed forces late this - early next year. The head of the Ministry of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov said this in an interview with the Zvezda TV channel.

      And if he doesn't, will he be removed for the loss of confidence, or is no one in the government responsible for his words?
      1. Alf
        +3
        23 August 2020 21: 53
        Quote: 123456789
        in the government no one is responsible for their words?

        For 20 years they have not answered ...
    10. +1
      23 August 2020 17: 11
      Let us remind you that in April this year Denis Manturov said in an interview with the Rossiya 1 TV company that the T-14 Armata tank would be exported and that its export appearance was being determined. However, the supply of the tank to potential buyers will begin only after all obligations for the supply of "Armata" to the Russian army are fulfilled.

      In June, Interfax, citing its own source, said that Armata had already received an export passport.

      One gets the feeling that Manturov is "asleep and sees" the export of "Armat" - as an obsession!
      1. Alf
        0
        23 August 2020 21: 54
        Quote: Lesorub
        One gets the feeling that Manturov is "asleep and sees" the export of "Armat" - as an obsession!

        So at all times and in all countries, export delivery without a rollback to the Decider has never happened ...
    11. -1
      23 August 2020 17: 29
      Manturov recites a mantra ...........
    12. 0
      23 August 2020 17: 54
      In general, according to the statements of these two gentlemen, an oil painting: until a contract for the export supply of T-14 with some Kampuchea is concluded - figs you will see this Armata in the troops .. for it is expensive and there is no need .. Exactly the same picture with Su- 57 .. Modernization is our everything.
      1. Aag
        0
        23 August 2020 19: 39
        Quote: Dikson
        In general, according to the statements of these two gentlemen, an oil painting: until a contract for the export supply of T-14 with some Kampuchea is concluded - figs you will see this Armata in the troops .. for it is expensive and there is no need .. Exactly the same picture with Su- 57 .. Modernization is our everything.

        I wonder if Poseidon's "export look" has already been developed?
        What a country it has become - all for sale! am
    13. -3
      23 August 2020 18: 24
      So the engine was brought to mind. The tanks are standing, the engines are waiting. They will put them in the army right away. Well, in Syria, chasing them in the tail and mane ... Maybe it will be possible to shoot at the Leopards, Abrams and Merkavs ...
      1. +1
        24 August 2020 04: 05
        Quote: Dzafdet
        So the engine has been brought to mind.
        Which one? X-shaped, which is put on the manufactured ones - it still works normally. High-speed "Seagull" to Armata never not put
        So which one?

        Quote: Dzafdet
        The tanks are standing, the engines are waiting.
        And we were driving along Red Square - were the soldiers pedaling in it? wassat
    14. 0
      23 August 2020 19: 22
      The correct approach is to first drive an experimental batch in the army, and then consider a further order. What shouted then? Yes, we cannot rivet such imperfections as F35.
      1. +1
        24 August 2020 04: 07
        Quote: Sergey Kulikov_3
        Yes, we cannot rivet such imperfections as F35.
        We can and did even in the USSR. Sawing a budget for modernization (right after production) is delicious.
      2. 0
        27 September 2020 22: 59
        > such imperfections as F35

        Su-35 there you have already taught how to throw missiles? how many years from the beginning of the series later?
    15. -3
      23 August 2020 22: 14
      Quote: Alf
      Quote: 123456789
      in the government no one is responsible for their words?

      For 20 years they have not answered ...

      Every nation is worthy of its ruler!
      Socrates hi
    16. 0
      23 August 2020 23: 20
      As comrade Saakhov said "Uh, tarapitsa ne nada".
      Why rip your ass? There is no war. Therefore, it is better to polish the most promising tank in the world to a shine.
    17. 0
      24 August 2020 11: 35
      Give the T-14 to tank biathlon - it will compete with the T-72B3 good
    18. 0
      24 August 2020 12: 39
      However, the supply of the tank to potential buyers will begin only after all obligations for the supply of "Armata" to the Russian army are fulfilled.

      Then you don't have to worry ... by the time they put several dozen (at least a little already!) Into our army - Armata will already become outdated, customers' interest will diminish, as well as the zeros in the proposed contracts.
    19. 0
      24 August 2020 18: 54
      Quote: Simargl
      Quote: Dzafdet
      So the engine has been brought to mind.
      Which one? X-shaped, which is put on the manufactured ones - it still works normally. High-speed "Seagull" to Armata never not put
      So which one?

      Quote: Dzafdet
      The tanks are standing, the engines are waiting.
      And we were driving along Red Square - were the soldiers pedaling in it? wassat


      Himself is weak in the internet to rummage? Everything is written there ... https: //topwar.ru/167639-chto-proishodit-s-tankom-armata.html
    20. 0
      25 August 2020 09: 42
      = According to Manturov, the adoption of the T-14 tank for service depends on state tests. Currently, he said, there are many export applications for the tank and customers are monitoring the progress of the tank's tests. It seems to me that this will happen before the end of this year - at the beginning of next year =

      = At the same time, the general director of Rosoboronexport, Alexander Mikheev, said that there are no export orders for the T-14 Armata tank yet. =

      And which of them is lying? And, alone it seems to me that this is not Mikheev?
      Is Manturov actually on the topic he is talking about?

      = In June, Interfax, citing its own source, reported that Armata had already received an export passport. =

      Like this? The tests are not over yet, but do you already have an export passport?
      So maybe there is already such a passport for the "ion engine"?
    21. 0
      30 August 2020 20: 11
      As a person who previously worked at UVZ, I know one thing: the plant is capable of producing 500 tanks a year. These are T-90 and modernized T-72. Production lines in workshops are sharpened for this. To produce "Armata" on a large scale, it is necessary either to reconfigure the production line, abandoning the T-90 and T-72, or to create a new one. It will NOT work to produce T-90 and T-14 on the same line. Therefore, "Armata" is assembled in a separate workshop "on the knee", almost without mechanization. And the production of parts for it is wedged into the production process of serial tanks. The accounting department is shooting too :)

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"