Minsk, as a response to Lithuania's intervention, may refuse to use the port of Klaipeda

86

A measure was outlined that could be applied by Minsk in case of continued active interference by Vilnius in the internal affairs of Belarus.

Today the Lithuanian Seim (Parliament) adopted a resolution according to which Alexander Lukashenko is not recognized as the elected President of the Republic of Belarus. Former candidate Svetlana Tikhanovskaya is on the territory of Lithuania, which Vilnius is promoting to the presidency of Belarus. Moreover, both the President of Lithuania and the head of the Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs have already spoken out, stating that they are demanding either a recount of votes or re-elections. Also, the Ministry of Energy of Lithuania states that they expect from the "new leadership of Belarus to resolve the issue of the Belarusian nuclear power plant."



Minsk is still collecting data and claims from the Lithuanian authorities in a "special folder". And the reaction in case of special persistence of Vilnius from Minsk may follow different - including economic.

One of the potentially effective methods for sobering up the Lithuanian authorities is the possible refusal to use the Lithuanian Klaipeda as a transshipment port. Today it is Belarusian export and Belarusian import that is an important component of the economic activity of the port of Klaipeda. At one time, "Belaruskali" acquired a 30% stake in a Lithuanian company serving the bulk cargo terminal of the port of Klaipeda.

Now (and this is being said in Lithuania itself) Minsk can take certain economic steps towards Lithuania, refusing to transship cargo through the port of Klaipeda in favor of Russian ports.

At the same time, the Lithuanian prime minister Saulius Skvernelis believes that “it will not be economically beneficial for Belarus”.
  • Facebook / Klaipeda port
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

86 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +31
    18 August 2020 17: 23
    Lithuania would not get involved in the affairs of Belarus ...
    1. +38
      18 August 2020 17: 28
      I hope more for similar actions in relation to Ukraine, for example, a ban on the supply of fuels and lubricants. So that the APU equipment would simply stand up. Although, it's too good to be true ... money ...
      1. +14
        18 August 2020 17: 37
        First, you need to sell the block of shares, for example, to the Poles or some Estonians, and then refuse the services of the port.
        Subsequently, you can buy back the shares of the port that have become securities. And Belarus will have its own access to the sea wink Shrimp will be completely official !!
        1. -3
          18 August 2020 17: 49
          And what kind of package does Belarus have? The oil terminal there is Norwegian, the port itself, to be honest, I don’t know whose.
          1. +10
            18 August 2020 17: 53
            The text of the news indicates. "At one time, Belaruskali acquired a 30% stake in a Lithuanian company servicing the bulk cargo terminal of the port of Klaipeda"
            1. 0
              18 August 2020 17: 55
              Ah, I just thought that you are not talking about the terminal, but about the entire port. Got it.
              1. +24
                18 August 2020 18: 07
                In return, Minsk must recognize Abkhazia, Ossetia, LPR, DPR. Recognize Crimea as Russian.
                And to confirm the State with Russia by a complete merger.

                And finally, the AHL will personally send comrades from the State Department and the entire EU, including the Turks.

                And you will remain, Grygorich, for centuries the man who united the torn Russian people.

                And all this must be done in Belovezhskaya Pushcha.
                1. -22
                  18 August 2020 18: 17
                  Uh-huh.
                  Again, "Minsk needs ..."
                  About the same news - "Now Minsk can take certain economic steps towards Lithuania, refusing to transship cargo through the port of Klaipeda in favor of Russian ports."
                  Only for some reason the authors of such articles do not come up with a simple thought: Minsk today is already a little different from Lukashenka.
                  To be more precise, it is not at all what Lukashenka is. These are no longer synonyms.
                  And this other Minsk will somehow deal with its problems on its own, without instructions from the outside, what it supposedly should do.
                  1. 0
                    19 August 2020 13: 44
                    Quote: snucerist
                    And this other Minsk will somehow deal with its problems on its own

                    It can be seen. He understands himself, though under the direct leadership of some "well-deserved democracies" from the near and far abroad (which, well, do not interfere laughing ), and of course, myself. laughing
                  2. +1
                    19 August 2020 21: 43
                    Quote: snucerist
                    without pointers from the outside, what he supposedly should do.

                    ABOUT ! Land! Would you like a myst ... W Kryzhopelya, why is Berdychiva? Ha!? Sho, sho, and well, a former compatriot of the independent ukraYny!
                2. +2
                  18 August 2020 18: 33
                  Quote: Temples
                  And to confirm the State with Russia by a complete merger.

                  And finally, the AHL will personally send comrades from the State Department and the entire EU, including the Turks.

                  And you will remain, Grygorich, for centuries the man who united the torn Russian people.

                  In my opinion, yesterday, on the radio "Moscow speaking", there was an interview with Sergei Stankevich. He claimed that the "Union Treaty" had been ratified between Russia and Belarus. Moreover, both parliaments. It remains only to gather four representatives, including presidents and prime ministers, from the spirit of the parties and discuss the details of the reunification.
                  1. +3
                    18 August 2020 18: 40
                    With Stankevich, basically everything is approximately / true.
                    After it, you need to double-check what is there and how.
                    1. +1
                      18 August 2020 18: 50
                      https://www.postkomsg.com/historysg/
                      On January 26, 2000, after ratification of the Treaty by the parliaments of the two countries, it entered into force.
                      1. 0
                        18 August 2020 19: 54
                        20 years are lost. It's a pity. hi
                      2. +2
                        18 August 2020 20: 42
                        Cunning (gudgeon) Lukashevich.
      2. +2
        18 August 2020 17: 38
        Quote: RUnnm
        become true ... money ..

        Truth and money are hard to match in politics. And Lukashenka is used to measuring friendship with money, so he got a problem out of the blue. An attempt to sit on several chairs, and even fuck with it, must sooner or later end in disaster.
      3. 0
        18 August 2020 20: 38
        The bottom line is that then it is not the military man who will suffer, but ordinary carriers and people because they will raise the prices for travel!
    2. 0
      18 August 2020 17: 54
      In the affairs of Belarus, except for the Belarusians themselves, in general, no one needs to poke around! Let the people of the republic solve their problems, preferably peacefully, without outside "experts" and "consultants with advisers"!
    3. 0
      18 August 2020 17: 58
      Well, yes, the Russian ports are a little further, and if Kaliningrad comes to an agreement with Poland, then it is possible to bypass the Balts. If the curators allow Poland. Well, if they do not allow, then our discount will be given to Belarus)
      1. +3
        18 August 2020 18: 27
        They already gave it to Luka a couple of years ago by agreement with Russian Railways, but the scum spat in the face. The same applied to oil products going to the West.
    4. 0
      19 August 2020 09: 59
      It is not up to Lithuania to decide.
  2. +19
    18 August 2020 17: 23
    Minsk, as a response to Lithuania's intervention, may refuse to use the port of Klaipeda
    Why can it? Obliged ... The capacities of the Russian Ust-Luga are awaiting ...
    1. +11
      18 August 2020 17: 30
      I'm more interested in who will use it then? Our transit has been there for a long time, but in Europe there are enough ports
      I looked at the statistics: bulk cargo from Lithuania and Belarus, agricultural products from the same place
      1. +10
        18 August 2020 17: 34
        Quote: K-612-O
        I'm more interested in who will use it then? Our transit has been there for a long time, but in Europe there are enough ports

        Ukrainians ... as a sign of support ...
      2. +5
        18 August 2020 17: 46
        Quote: K-612-O
        I'm more interested in who will use it then?

        What's the difference, the Russian Federation has no reason to worry about the fate of someone else's port. I think this is how it should be - you are hostile: then we will let someone else earn money. And the Russian Federation will find an opportunity to make another route attractive.
        By that newly made it is necessary at least to read newspapers or something: several years ago, when neighboring Latvia reproached the Russian Federation, that it redirects railway cargo to its ports and does not allow the development of the Latvian railway; the ambassador of the Russian Federation clearly answered: we do not set as our goal the development of your railway ... uuups, since then they have been smoothly 'winding up'
      3. +2
        18 August 2020 17: 50
        There the Chinese have been approaching him for a long time
      4. 0
        18 August 2020 17: 53
        It seems that about 10-12% of this port is still loaded by Russia.
      5. +4
        18 August 2020 17: 59
        Quote: K-612-O
        Our transit has been there for a long time

        There is no Russian "transit" route through Klaipeda for a long time. Transshipment, and of cargo to Belarus and Kazakhstan. Although the port is not freezing, it withers from year to year. Shipbuilding and ship repair on the verge of sludge. Everything is the same as it was in 1940.
        1. -5
          18 August 2020 18: 11
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Quote: K-612-O
          Our transit has been there for a long time

          There is no Russian "transit" route through Klaipeda for a long time. Transshipment, and of cargo to Belarus and Kazakhstan. Although the port is not freezing, it withers from year to year. Shipbuilding and ship repair on the verge of sludge. Everything is the same as it was in 1940.

          Klaipeda port has set a record for cargo turnover

          07: 15 13.04.2020
          (updated 07:58 13.04.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX)

          The new figures exceeded the port's achievements in March last year. In addition, the best result in the history of the port was beaten.

          VILNIUS, 13 Apr - Sputnik. Klaipeda port has broken the last year's record for cargo turnover, the port's press service reports.
          1. +4
            18 August 2020 18: 48
            Quote: Liam
            The new figures exceeded the port's achievements in March last year. In addition, the best result in the history of the port was beaten.
            Klaipeda has always been the least dependent on Russian transit in contrast to its neighbors. Its main flows are local and Belarusian mineral fertilizers, oil products from the home refinery Orlen Lietuva, containers. The decrease in the cargo turnover of the Klaipeda seaport in 2019 is due to the expiration in the second half of the year of contracts on the export of Belarusian fertilizers to Asia and a reduction in the loading of oil products.
            1. +1
              18 August 2020 19: 35
              Quote: tihonmarine
              Klaipeda has always been the least dependent on Russian transit in contrast to its neighbors

              There, it seems, the states helped by imposing sanctions on the Latvian Ventspils port last year, there, in the first half of 2020, a fall of 40,9%, the flows could go to Klaipeda. Although there, in 1 half a year, a fall -
              During the first six months of this year, Klaipeda port handled 22,1 million tons of cargo, which is 6,6 percent less than in the same period last year. This was reported by the press service of the sea harbor.
              https://lt.sputniknews.ru/economy/20200801/12760835/Klaypedskiy-port-postradal-ot-krizisa-iz-zaCOVID-19-menshe-chem-sosedi.html
              1. +1
                18 August 2020 22: 29
                Thank you for the link.
          2. +2
            18 August 2020 19: 13
            Quote: Liam
            Klaipeda port has broken the last year's record for cargo turnover, the port's press service reports.

            Last year 1 steamer arrived, and this year 2. + 100% of cargo turnover. Record!
            1. +1
              18 August 2020 20: 27
              Quote: Piramidon
              Last year 1 steamer arrived, and this year 2. + 100% of cargo turnover. Record!

              Well, in principle, cargo turnover for Lithuania is not bad 46 million tons. The same figures for two ports of Latvia and 5 ports of Estonia. And at the same time, the new port of Ust Luga for 100 million tons. Primorsk and Peter 60 million tons each. Ust Luga and Primorsk have taken away almost all Russian cargo turnover in the Baltic. Plus, Russia is working through Finland.
  3. -20
    18 August 2020 17: 24
    To evil enemies,
    Selling a goat!
    Let the children not drink milk ...
    fool
    1. +8
      18 August 2020 17: 27
      What's the problem? Do you think that Klaipeda is the only suitable port?
    2. +3
      18 August 2020 17: 54
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      To evil enemies,
      Selling a goat!

      I'll buy a rooster.
    3. -1
      18 August 2020 17: 56
      this crazy, crazy world of ............ freebie desires.
      China and Western giants will buy (30% bulk!) For a long wait.
      they will also ask the GDP to develop cooperation "along the shortest route"
  4. +11
    18 August 2020 17: 25
    Eh, still they would stop driving diesel fuel to Ukraine for the Ukrainian Armed Forces ...
  5. +9
    18 August 2020 17: 28
    Welcome to the Russian port of Ust-Luga.
  6. +3
    18 August 2020 17: 29
    Be that as it may, the answer is good and is aimed precisely at the vulnerable point of the current politicians closely connected with business - the Lithuanian pocket. Of course, not the main customers of what is happening are sitting in Lithuania, but this will have to think about. The lost industry of Belarus, if the coup succeeds, will surely hit the European Union, and even more so in a pandemic.
  7. +10
    18 August 2020 17: 29
    The Lithuanians are only now beginning to realize that the Klaipeda port will be broken off again. Don't worry, they are monsters in geopolitics, only Everest is cooler. wassat
    1. +4
      18 August 2020 17: 44
      Quote: tralflot1832
      The Lithuanians have just begun to realize that the Klaipeda port will be broken off again.

      Nothing breaks off there, was under repair for a class there two years ago, and saw how new berths were being built, it does not seem that they would be in poverty
      1. +6
        18 August 2020 18: 00
        Quote: Humpbacked Horse
        Quote: tralflot1832
        The Lithuanians have just begun to realize that the Klaipeda port will be broken off again.

        Nothing breaks off there, was under repair for a class there two years ago, and saw how new berths were being built, it does not seem that they would be in poverty

        I remember Klaipeda at the beginning of the XNUMXs, when the cunning Lithuanians literally squeezed the traditional transit of Belaruskali products from Latvians through Ventspils. In Ventspils, the dockers themselves said that the port could not survive in such conditions.
        And in Klaipeda, the stevedore brigadier then received 1 thousand litas a month, which at the rate was equal to 2 thousand evergreens.
        With the beginning of the construction of Ust-Luga, and the withdrawal of Russian transit from the Baltic states, things in Klaipeda went slack. But they were proudly planning to build a terminal for handling supercontainer carriers from Maersk. They even started one, for an experiment ...
        Today the port of Klaipeda is famous for its Independence storage tanker. Which, when floats up, during the emptying of tanks from liquefied Norwegian gas, demonstrates the tricolor. Not Latvian. lol
        And so - yes, the port is functioning, the Mukran-Klaipeda line is operating as the shortest route for goods from Germany through the Baltic states.
        1. +2
          18 August 2020 18: 15
          And in Klaipeda, the stevedore brigade leader then received 1 thousand litas a month, which at the rate was equal to 2 thousand evergreens

          Chiivvoo !? Maximum 450! At the lowest rate ...
          1. +3
            18 August 2020 18: 17
            Quote: Theodore
            Chiivvoo !? Maximum 450! At the lowest rate.

            Maybe I confused it with Latvian lats?
            It was in 2000.
      2. +2
        18 August 2020 18: 01
        We need to pick out who the owners are. I was also in Klapeida, but long ago, when there were a lot of retirees of the Navy, no one wanted to leave. The impression was that Russian-speaking people are engaged in business in Klaipeda, locals for a Lugei share in Europe. The Ukrainians did repairs to the class. At the beginning of 2000, the trawl fleet in Klaipeda made "vacuum cleaners" from Modzund, the miracle yard was mostly Ukrainians. Look at the cargo turnover, dad gave them a second wind, and now we need to load Ust Luga, ours are shooting something grandiose there. hi
  8. -12
    18 August 2020 17: 31
    That's it, the Belarusian shrimps and kiwi are over ...
    1. +3
      18 August 2020 17: 54
      Quote: A. Privalov
      That's it, the Belarusian shrimps and kiwi are over ...

      You should only be sneering in Israel .. fool
    2. 0
      18 August 2020 18: 06
      Shrimp, salmon, all sea fish (not having a fishing fleet) do not touch, this is sacred! crying
    3. -1
      22 August 2020 11: 18
      Quote: A. Privalov
      That's it, the Belarusian shrimps and kiwi are over ...

      They still did not reach you, shrimp and kiwi are only for the elite ...
  9. +2
    18 August 2020 17: 35
    The main thing that
    potentially effective methods for sobering up
    did not affect the citizens of Belarus.
    1. +3
      18 August 2020 17: 38
      There is Kaliningrad next to the FEZ, I don't think it's more expensive there
  10. +5
    18 August 2020 17: 35
    Lukashenko. You should have expelled the Lithuanian ambassador from Belarus home for consultations.
    I'm tired of this non-intervention.
  11. +1
    18 August 2020 17: 35
    Of course, it is necessary and necessary to influence the Balts. Yes, it will only wipe out because it is the EU and, in general, money to someone.
  12. -8
    18 August 2020 17: 36
    There, on the border with Lithuania, Bat'ka pulled together the sickly troops of the MLRS Polonaise, Hurricane, Smerch, OTR Iskander ... Lithuania's campaign must subside
    1. +1
      18 August 2020 17: 53
      I don't know how reliable the information is, but the material is interesting
      Kiev is preparing to transfer Nazi militant groups to Belarus.
      https://tsargrad.tv/news/zhjostkij-otbor-i-strogie-kriterii-kiev-gotovit-k-perebroske-v-belorussiju-nacistskie-gruppirovki_274533
      1. -1
        18 August 2020 18: 00
        Not with Batka, this will not work, he has no billion, there is nowhere to run, he will roll everyone into the asphalt
  13. -1
    18 August 2020 17: 45
    And what if all ports possible for Minsk refuse to cooperate with it? after all, this may well be so, even in spite of the fear of the Collective West about the transition of Belarus under Russia !!!
    1. +7
      18 August 2020 17: 52
      Russian ports, the same Ust Luga is ... Velkom))
  14. +2
    18 August 2020 17: 49
    smile Good quotes by Mitrokh:
    First, you need to sell the block of shares, and only then refuse the port's services.
    Subsequently, you can buy back the shares of the port that have become securities. And Belarus will have its own access to the sea. Shrimps will become completely official !!

    It is a good idea to sell, the round-trip transport will be stopped, and in half a year, when the share price falls below the baseboard, to buy a port. smile
    Come on Old Man, I support you to make money with normal ice!
  15. +3
    18 August 2020 17: 52
    Also, the Ministry of Energy of Lithuania states that they expect from the "new leadership of Belarus to resolve the issue of the Belarusian nuclear power plant."
    Lithuania has become completely insolent, it already considers the territory of Belarus to be its fiefdom, and even removes one Belarusian president and puts another. But most of all, Lithuania needs to prevent the launch of the Bel NPP. And if Lithuania gave refuge to Tikhanovskaya, and promotes her to this post in the EU, then in gratitude they can close the Bel NPP. But what about the Russian loan for the construction of a nuclear power plant, who will give 10 billion. Or how Ukraine is still barking at Russia, but has not given away 3 billion.
    1. +1
      18 August 2020 21: 44
      So, in addition to the unfinished court of 3 billion, there was in 2016 a positive decision on Rosatom in a dispute with Bulgarians in the Geneva arbitration ...
  16. -3
    18 August 2020 17: 52
    At the same time, the Lithuanian prime minister Saulius Skvernelis believes that “it will not be economically beneficial for Belarus”.

    Frightened .. There is no time for the economy, such interference in the internal affairs of the state, in general, it smacks of war! In my opinion, everything goes to the fact that Belarus will become part of Russia, without any special conditions ..
    1. -2
      18 August 2020 18: 05
      Belarus will become part of Russia
      Lukashenka will “defend sovereignty” (his power, status and income) to the last Belarusian.
  17. +1
    18 August 2020 17: 55
    In Klaipeda, there is the Bellarusian plant for the packaging of callium salt BKT, the salary is about 3000 euros, plus about 40% of the cargo is transshipped by the port itself, the rest of Russia, if the Belarusians are closed, then only the container business will remain.
  18. +1
    18 August 2020 17: 55
    Lithuanians and Poles itch, itch in one place ... They remembered their imperial past.
  19. +1
    18 August 2020 17: 57
    Quote: RUnnm
    And what kind of package does Belarus have? The oil terminal there is Norwegian, the port itself, to be honest, I don’t know whose.

    The port is divided and the Belarusians have their own berth
    1. 0
      19 August 2020 08: 31
      Quote: tarakan
      The port is divided and the Belarusians have their own berth

      Rented by a private owner. Common world practice.
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. +1
    18 August 2020 18: 22
    Felis, you say? The case when not a person paints a surname, but a surname "paints" a person. In general, the analogy with mice and cactus will act in the interests of gay European solidarity; and this is wonderful, gentlemen!
  22. 0
    18 August 2020 18: 32
    Quote: parusnik
    Lithuania would not get involved in the affairs of Belarus ...

    All their lives they go where they don't need to
    1. 0
      19 August 2020 08: 40
      Quote: Codexgigas
      All their lives they go where they don't need to

      Well, how not to go when the territory of modern Belarus was the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and then the Commonwealth. There is even a witness to the Nesvizh castle. In the XVI-XX centuries. - the residence of the Radziwill princes.
  23. +2
    18 August 2020 18: 36
    Not a bad idea.
  24. 0
    18 August 2020 19: 41
    Now (and this is being spoken about in Lithuania itself) Minsk can take certain economic steps towards Lithuania, refusing to transship cargo through the port of Klaipeda in favor of Russian ports

    Aha, but before it was impossible? Then Luka played the anti-Russian card in every possible way. And now he was offended by the litvins' molded syabrov. Luca, such a Luca. wink
  25. 0
    18 August 2020 20: 08
    Lukash, like that bird, is stuck with a claw .. well, then you know ... the terrible thing is that behind his loot the country is being pushed into the abyss .. for example Ukraine ..
  26. +2
    18 August 2020 20: 14
    Saulius Skvernalis
    what a suitable name. Maybe there is also a stink?
  27. +3
    18 August 2020 20: 21
    Well, we built our ports bypassing the Balts .. the question is why our union state still handles with these little things?
  28. 0
    18 August 2020 20: 32
    And recently I read here in VO that Belarus wanted to use the port in Klaipeda. That oil purchased from Norway should go through this port. This was supposed to be an element of pressure to reduce the price of Russian oil.

    https://topwar.ru/166960-belorussija-zakupila-partiju-norvezhskoj-nefti.html
    (According to the agreement, the oil will be delivered on January 22 through the Lithuanian port of Klaipeda, rather by rail ...

    Earlier it was reported that Minsk could not agree with Russian oil companies on oil supplies from January 1, 2020, after which the Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko ordered to look for alternative supplies of oil products.

    First Deputy Prime Minister of Belarus Dmitry Krutoy said that the government had sent commercial offers to buy oil to Ukraine, Poland, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and the Baltic countries.
  29. +5
    18 August 2020 21: 41
    just don’t say that if Belarus refuses to transit its export-import
    cargo through Klaipel port, it will not be profitable for Belarus. No matter how it is. Distance from
    the Belarusian border at the entrance to the territory of Lithuania, in fact, the same as before the Lithuanian
    Klaipeda port, which is to the Russian ports in Kalininrad and Pionersk through Lithuania. And in fact, the same distance by rail from the Belarusian border to the Russian port in Ust-Luga, in a straight line through the territory of Russia. In Pionersk, Kaliningrad region, Russia has built a new powerful port, a new powerful port in Ust-Luga, ports in Kaliningrad and St. Petersburg, and Lukoshenko drives export-import through the Lithuanian Klaipeda. For the money that Belarus pays to Lithuania, Lithuania builds nests and dens of Russophobia and hatred of Russia, pay NATO out of this money, and supports all kinds of Gozmans, Kasparovs, Kasyanovs, Svanidz, Khodorkovskys, etc. Because the gatherings of these enemies of Russia have been going on in Vilnius for a couple of years. It discusses plans on how to harm Russia, and Lukashenka, through the transit of goods to the port of Klaipeda, feeds Lithuania, which clearly wants the demise of Russia, and the enemies of Russia. So you have not read the comments on the Lithuanian websites when the Turks shot down a Russian plane, when ISIS shot down a Russian plane and a Russian pilot died when the plane with the ensemble fell. Alexandrova. Thousands of comments in Lithuanian with delight, like a holiday for them, that Russian pilots and artists were killed, They were even happy that Dr. Lisa died. And today, in Syria, a Russian major general died, so how many joyful comments on
    Lithuanian sites. Read who knows the Lithuanian language. And no one there deletes such comments. Such an order was given at the state level to editors and moderators. But in the Belarusian Foreign Ministry, there are analysts and translators who report to Lukashenka about what is happening in Lithuania. As, by the way, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs should also report to the Russian leadership what is being done in that Lithuania. And the Belarusian transit goes to the Klaipeda port, and not to the ports of Russia ... just as, by the way, tanks with Russian oil from Russia are also very frequent guests in the Klaipeda port ...
  30. +4
    18 August 2020 21: 50
    It has been talked about for a long time. On Lithuanian railways, freight trains are only from Belarus. There is nothing of our own. Lithuanians, as usual, thanked Lukashenko for his multi-vector nature.
  31. +2
    19 August 2020 00: 23
    Another plus is loading for our ports, and another minus to the economy for sprats.
  32. +1
    19 August 2020 20: 47
    It is sad to look at all these games around objects in which the USSR invested such tremendous forces! That only is the Klaipeda Shipyard, the International Sea Ferry Service in the GDR. How many similar objects have they built in their "nezalezhnosti" ... and they pour mud on us?
    1. 0
      19 August 2020 22: 19
      The whole country invested in infrastructure (ports, factories, design bureaus, research institutes, etc.). From agrarian Ukraine, where most of the population was swineherds, woodcutters, etc. and they lived in dungs, created the most powerful industrial complex in Europe (shipbuilding, aircraft construction, metallurgy, the world's largest shipping company - the Black Sea Shipping Company) and now they write that they were left with only Chernobyl ... led.
  33. 0
    19 August 2020 21: 42
    Quote: RUnnm
    I hope more for similar actions in relation to Ukraine, for example, a ban on the supply of fuels and lubricants. So that the APU equipment would simply stand up. Although, it's too good to be true ... money ...

    Russia will still have to help, these are the political conditions for help.
  34. 0
    19 August 2020 22: 11
    Should affect the cargo turnover of our port of Ust-Luga! The Baltic states must pay for their games at the stronghold of European democracy.
  35. -1
    20 August 2020 16: 58
    Saulius Skvernyalis just won't be called ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"