Detonation or shot from a grenade launcher: footage of an incident on the route of a joint patrol of the Turkish and Russian armed forces in Syria is shown

37
Detonation or shot from a grenade launcher: footage of an incident on the route of a joint patrol of the Turkish and Russian armed forces in Syria is shown

In Syria, another explosion occurred on the way of a military patrol. According to some reports, an explosive device set by unknown persons detonated on the road along which a joint Russian-Turkish patrol was carrying out.

At the moment, it is noted that an unidentified explosive device detonated on the section of the Ain al-Habr - Trumba highway in the Idlib province. This is a road that connects the largest city in the Syrian Arab Republic of Aleppo with the Mediterranean coast and ports of Latakia.



It is known that the crews of three BTR-82A were involved in patrolling from the Russian side. Patrol control was carried out using a helicopter. No activity of the militants immediately before the passage of the column was noticed. This suggests that the militants knew very well the parameters of the route, including the time of passage of the convoy of the joint patrol.

There is also another version. About her below.

The Russian command says that there are no casualties or injuries among the servicemen of the Russian contingent.

The explosion took place under a Turkish armored vehicle. At the moment, no data has been received on the state of the Turkish military who were in the armored car.

The footage from the scene is shown. It is noteworthy that considerations are expressed on the network (the same is a different version) that it was not an explosion, but a shot from a grenade launcher with a direct hit on Turkish armored vehicles.


37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    17 August 2020 14: 07
    It can be seen that undermining.
    1. +5
      17 August 2020 15: 00
      Quote: figvam
      It can be seen that undermining.

      The purest undermining with landmarks on the power poles and preliminary video recording.
      Yes, and there are few suicides, one-time fire from a grenade launcher at an armed convoy.
    2. +4
      17 August 2020 15: 06
      Quote: figvam
      It can be seen that undermining.

      Do not go to a fortuneteller ...
      I don’t understand, they don’t use the "Shroud" or the "barmaley" have learned to bypass it?
      1. +1
        18 August 2020 01: 53
        Do not go to a fortuneteller

        Too little information. It is difficult to give an exact answer from such a shooting angle. Only one thing can be said unequivocally from this video - the blast wave went sideways. It looks like a monk with a stretch
        I don’t understand, they don’t use the "Shroud" or the "barmaley" have learned to bypass it?
        .
        Maybe the VU was not radio-controlled, or maybe the 7M4 was simply turned off so that it would not interfere with the sotika, or the Internet. Or maybe it’s just that the video was shot from a Turkish car, and ours with 7M4 were 50 meters apart from them. kept. Here the "Veil" did not extinguish the signal.
  2. +3
    17 August 2020 14: 07
    An RPG would have scattered a Turkish armored car, they have versions. Despite the fact that the car drove on after the explosion. And the Janissaries have concussions with a guarantee.
    1. -1
      17 August 2020 14: 15
      K-612-0 - depending on what they beat! Maybe a Chinese craft, or an old one, perhaps from the middle of the 20th century. I was guided by the second video, it looks like it's not a ground explosion!
      1. +1
        17 August 2020 14: 18
        They have quite new grenades there, mostly Bulgarian, American and Belarusian. So the car would definitely come
        1. +1
          17 August 2020 14: 28
          Ours are lucky that they are going strictly along the route.
      2. +1
        17 August 2020 14: 34
        In my opinion, it is terrestrial. hi
      3. +1
        17 August 2020 15: 31
        1. For an RPG - too much undermining. Too much fire and smoke. 2. An RPG or ATGM would most likely pierce through the car with ignition inside.
      4. 0
        17 August 2020 23: 10
        Quote: Thrifty
        I was guided by the second video, it looks like it's not a ground explosion!

        ======
        It just looks like it's still a mine! RPG tears a little differently.
      5. 0
        17 August 2020 23: 21
        Quote: Thrifty
        what old version, possibly mid-20th century

        Yeah, Hitler Youth with Faustpatron. laughing
  3. -4
    17 August 2020 14: 08
    It is quite possible that they fired from the grenade launcher, because the explosion was not at ground level, but as when the rocket was sent to the side.
  4. +6
    17 August 2020 14: 08
    Probably cynical, but the main thing is that not according to our ...
  5. +3
    17 August 2020 14: 08
    Interestingly, the Turks accidentally fell under the distribution, or was it intended? All the same, about Turkish proxies, they mainly wield the gadyushnik.
    1. +1
      17 August 2020 14: 12
      Since the Chechens took responsibility, I suspect the Ottomans accidentally flew in. The armored personnel carriers were driving on the other side.
      Yes, and whoever is not there, the same nusryat and a bunch of all sorts of unintelligible bum "opposition".
      1. +2
        17 August 2020 14: 36
        Quote: K-612-O
        the Chechens took responsibility,

        Otkel firewood? Share?
        1. +4
          17 August 2020 15: 22
          The Kataib-Khattab-ash-Shishani grouping (Khattab battalion from Chechnya, translation).
          They officially admitted that it was them. The Turks ironed out the surroundings.
          From Rybar
          1. 0
            17 August 2020 15: 36
            С
            Quote: K-612-O
            The Kataib-Khattab-ash-Shishani grouping (Khattab battalion from Chechnya, translation).
            They officially admitted that it was them. The Turks ironed out the surroundings.
            From Rybar

            Thanks, I will look. hi
    2. 0
      18 August 2020 02: 36
      There are 2 armed groups in Idlib, for Russia both are terrorists; for the Turks, one is terrorists, the other is simply an "opposition". Now the Turks support the second, and everyone is at war with the first, as she is with everyone. Therefore, it does not matter for whom the launch was ...
  6. +4
    17 August 2020 14: 11
    What RPG? the video shows the explosion of a land mine, and on the side of the road, the armored car should not have any special damage, the maximum of the tires was cut.
  7. 0
    17 August 2020 14: 31
    Where did you find the video? In any case, it's bad - today for the Turks, and tomorrow for us.
  8. -4
    17 August 2020 14: 47
    I fully admit that this is a provocation of the Janissaries themselves
  9. +1
    17 August 2020 15: 01
    Landmine definitely!
  10. +1
    17 August 2020 15: 09
    It was not correctly laid down for the campaign, the blast wave went sideways, although it is not known why and who laid
  11. +1
    17 August 2020 15: 12
    And what about engineering reconnaissance of the route? Not? And what about the signal jammer? Not? And drones for monitoring instead of side and head outposts? Also not?
    1. 0
      17 August 2020 18: 23
      Quote: Stas1973
      And what about engineering reconnaissance of the route? Not? And what about the signal jammer? Not? And drones for monitoring instead of side and head outposts? Also not?

      Well, they are not assigned to the GPZ patrol. And engineering intelligence, like other types of intelligence, must be conducted constantly. But something shitty with her the last 30 years.
      1. 0
        17 August 2020 18: 55
        Here is the result. And about the patrol - read the section / paragraph / article "Movement in the composition ..."
        1. 0
          17 August 2020 19: 03
          Quote: Stas1973
          Here is the result. And about the patrol - read the section / paragraph / article "Movement in the composition ..."

          Section / paragraph / article of what?
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. +2
    17 August 2020 16: 58
    And the operator filmed for the report, right?
  14. 0
    17 August 2020 20: 28
    I guess who fired the grenade launcher.
    It's so "hard" to guess who has "sympathy" for the Turks
  15. 0
    18 August 2020 05: 44
    If a mine, then it was on the sidelines. It is not clear from the video whether it is controlled or not.
    1. 0
      18 August 2020 05: 47
      Not an RPG, definitely.
  16. 0
    18 August 2020 08: 42
    You have noticed that this is already the second time on this section of the road and shooting from the same angle ...
    Interestingly, our military intelligence officers have drawn conclusions, or still not?


    [media = https: //www.youtube.com/watch? v = S9rujqQh0WA]
  17. 0
    18 August 2020 09: 04
    It is very clear that an explosion on the side of the road has occurred. Therefore, the car was not damaged. In my opinion, a land mine, but not a lot of power
    1. 0
      18 August 2020 09: 32
      The Turks reported that there was a low-power mine, the car was damaged, but everyone was intact.
    2. 0
      19 August 2020 08: 36
      Yes. It can be seen that the driver of this armored car has little experience or is poorly instructed: every now and then it clings to the side of the road, which is unacceptable in such situations!