Russian author for the US press: "Russia needs a new Gorbachev"

The American edition of The Nation publishes material in which the author discusses the protests in the Russian Far East. At the same time, Nadezhda Azhgikhina acts as the author, who called her article “Russia needs a new Gorbachev”. Nadezhda Azhgikhina previously worked for the Ogonyok magazine, as well as for the Komsomolskaya Pravda, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, and others.

According to the author, who prepared material for the American press, protests continue in Khabarovsk, which are unprecedented for Russia over the past twenty years. Apparently, in recent years, Mrs. Azhgikhina has something with memory, because the protests in Khabarovsk for Russia of the last 20 years are definitely not "unprecedented". There were also much larger protest rallies and processions. One example is the famous events on Bolotnaya Square in Moscow.

Further, in the material for the Western reader, the author reports on the reasons for the Khabarovsk protests, who Sergey Furgal is, why he was under investigation and who was replaced as the head of the region.

After that, Nadezhda Azhgikhina, who is currently the executive director of the PEN-Moscow organization, switches in her material to topics related to Vladimir Putin. In particular, with reference to the data of the Levada Center, it is stated that the popularity rating of Vladimir Putin "dropped to the lowest level - 23%." The author of the material in The Nation claims that the protests in Khabarovsk "caught the Kremlin by surprise" and, summing up, writes:

Propaganda cannot resist the influence of the Internet.

At the same time, in her article, Ms. Azhgikhina does not explain why Russia “needs a new Gorbachev”. If it is about glasnost, then there is more than enough of this glasnost and freedom of speech in Russia and about Russia - an example is the article by Azhgikhina herself for the American media. Or is it a transparent hint that Russia needs a "leader" under whose leadership the state will again find itself on the brink of extinction? Then let the "new Gorbachev" be better recommended for the USA itself ...

Comments

[RUnnm]

Not quite so ... Russia needs a new SMERSH!

[V1er]

Quote: RUnnm

.Russia needs a new

Russia needs a new Stalin, Peter I, it needs reformers who know what they are doing, do the right thing, get a positive result, are not afraid of the opinions of other countries and the inner rich.

[Svarog]

Quote: V1er

Quote: RUnnm

.Russia needs a new

Russia needs a new Stalin, Peter I, it needs reformers who know what they are doing, do the right thing, get a positive result, are not afraid of the opinions of other countries and the inner rich.

Russia needs statesmen at the helm, people who put state interests above personal ones. And naturally socially oriented statists, not in words, but in deeds. We need an ideology that will unite society .. This will be enough to move forward.

[Civil]

This Gorbachev also didn’t answer for his “deeds”, but they are wooing us yet ...

[cost]

"Russia needs a new Gorbachev"

Humpbacks went to spawn?

[Captain Pushkin]

Quote: Civil

This Gorbachev also didn’t answer for his “deeds”, but they are wooing us yet ...

We are not greedy, we have enough of one for our eyes.
We will concede the second Gorbachev (with the new Yeltsin in the collection) to the United States - let them enjoy the belly and do not deny themselves anything.

[4ekist]

... At the same time, in her article, Ms. Azhgikhina does not explain why Russia “needs a new Gorbachev”.

She mumbles what they want to hear from her. It is necessary to take a closer look at this organization "PEN-Moscow".

[Elephant]

or even better, send this madam to places not so distant for subversion ...

[Alexga]

people with public interests

First, it is necessary to clearly define what "state interests" are. Moving in a direction not knowing where is a dangerous path. Let us recall the history of 1981991.

[Svarog]

Quote: AlexGa

Moving in a direction without knowing where is a dangerous path.

So we go there and move .. not knowing where .. Can you answer where we are going? Definitely not into a bright future ..

[Simon]

For that, Gorbachev and Yeltsin definitely brought us to the "bright future"! We are still reaping the fruits of their perestroika.

[4ekist]

Show us, my dear, where the "bright future" is.

[BARKAS]

Russia needs statesmen at the helm, people who put state interests above personal ones.

Yes, only those who are now at the helm of the interests of the people, society are set apart from the interests of the state, guided by the principle "the state is me"!

[paul3390]

Quote: Svarog

We need an ideology that will unite society

This is impossible in principle. Well, what can you have in common with Chubais or Sechin there? And others like them are smaller. But the majority of the people can be united. Soviet power and the restoration of socialism.

[depressant]

Yes, Svarog, we need someone else. No, I am not calling for the ouster of Putin, I am not averse to him changing, becoming something like Peter the Great or Stalin.
But how can a person who owes everyone around him change? And he owes friends, and enemies, and overseas partners, and neighbors, and the people get confused under their feet, demand something there, and ... As such an anxious person, bound hand and foot by countless obligations to an endless series of different groups of the population, can do something that would satisfy everyone at once?
For example, in order for friends to continue to perceive their positions as a sinecure for gigantic salaries from the budget, the oligarchs could take that budget away with impunity as help in pumping out mineral resources, science and their own industry on its basis would suddenly bloom by themselves, the people would get high-paying jobs in the amount of at least one for each worker, small and medium-sized businesses would swell and grow like leaps and bounds, and demonstrations with chants would go through the streets one after another, "Long live Putin, our dear father! And whoever disagrees, it sucks!" "
I would like to...
But Peter had only one priority - a mighty Russia, and Stalin had a mighty USSR.
When there are too many commitments, nothing comes of it. Or, more precisely, developmental lag.

[georggy]

Peter 1 has one priority of kissing the back of the West and the introduction of serfdom in Russia, and nothing more.

[NEXUS]

At the same time, Nadezhda Azhgikhina acts as the author, who called her article “Russia needs a new Gorbachev”. Nadezhda Azhgikhina previously worked for the Ogonyok magazine, as well as for the Komsomolskaya Pravda, Nezavisimaya Gazeta and others.

That is, this individual first published articles for the glory of communism in Ogonyok and Komsomolskaya Pravda, and now she changed her shoes and let's hait and teach life.
Neither Tagged nor the new EBN of Russia resisted for nothing. They were not reformers, but were provocateurs, traitors to their country and people and puppets of Western forces. Point.
That is, this journalist advises again to destroy the country in essence and bring it to its knees. It seems to me alone that this lady, as a girl with reduced social responsibility for fifty dollars, sold out?

Quote: V1er

Russia needs a new Stalin, Peter I, needs reformers

Russia does not need a reformer. The reformers were bullied, "we will build our new world, and so on ... maybe we just need an adequate sincerely loving Russia and not a leavened patriot at the helm? And then with these reformers, the people either starve, or spiritually and educationally become poor ...
Reforms, revolutions, perestroika ... so with the reformers and we will sit and wait for a bright future to the grave and hell it will be. Just instead of breaking it, can it try to preserve, build something new and increase what is? Not? We messed up in the 90s ... did it help us much later?

[oldzek]

Andrey! They say that there is no more atheist than a former priest, so it is not surprising that this madame treats Russia this way.

[Kaw]

Russia needs a new Stalin, Peter I,

I partially agree. That's just, there would be such a strong leader who used all his charisma not to expand his power and satisfy personal pride (as it was with Stalin and Peter), but to create a strong, comfortable and stable country in which I would like to live to any foreigner and who would not start to crumble immediately after this strong leader leaves.

[Blacksmith 55]

God forbid. One more Russia cannot bear.
And among the people Gorbach enjoys such great "popularity".
Russia needs a strong government, which will have to toughly, but fairly, govern all sectors of society, while developing industry, creating jobs, and much more. It cannot be explained in three words.

[demo]

Each historical figure - Peter I, Stalin, not only ruled the situation "for themselves", but also sagged under the situation themselves.
Peter 1 built ships by hand, being an apprentice in Dutch shipyards.
He personally studied nautical science.
And he formed a personal opinion on many issues and began to drive the rest of Russia with a whip and an ax in the direction that seemed right to him.
The point of view of the "rabble" - i.e. common people, he was absolutely not interested.
Yes, he would never have thought of asking the opinion of a simple plowman.
Stalin is a party functionary who, as a result of a certain set of circumstances, became the head of the party and the leader.
First, we are the leader of a certain group of persons - the same party functionaries.
And only then, after removing from the path of various groups and persons hindering him, he began to implement exactly the policy that was optimal for this historical moment.
I think that Dzhugashvili, who robbed banks, and Dzhugashvili, who determines the fate of the world in Potsdam, are completely different personalities, although one and the same person.

This passage above is necessary for understanding what I will say next.
Finding in the history of Russia a person who would correspond to the current moment in time is not difficult.
But, first of all, we will not get full compliance.
Second.
As a person, she not only professes service to the country and people.
Often a personality makes the country and people start changing their traditions, customs, habits and much more.
And I don’t think you or I would like that.

The main problem of Russia is that having destroyed some of the bonds - the construction of a classless society that excludes the exploitation of one person by another, we did not give new spiritual bonds accepted by the majority of the people.
Not shackles, but spiritual bonds, I emphasize.
Those. in order to unite, albeit essentially different people, into a single community - the people.
And here we can say that the lack of state ideology is the main evil that harms us today like nothing else.
But neither United Russia, nor Putin, nor Zyuganov, nor the pygmies - Zhirinovsky and Mironov, will be able to form a coherent national idea.
Some of their statements should not be taken seriously.
And such uncertainty leads to very serious excesses.

The example of Ukraine, and now Belarus, is a very formidable warning.
But I think that those in power, these lessons will not be understood.

The presence of a national idea is a guiding star.
But the achievement of this goal, determined by the national idea, can happen in different ways.
The result is important, not the method.
This means that the power in the country can and must change. New faces, new heads, new thoughts must come.
But the goal remains the same.
It is determined by ideology.

[Vladimir61]

Quote: RUnnm

Russia needs a new SMERSH!

Russia needs peace, tranquility and movement forward! She will overcome everything else, as she has overcome more than once.

[Sotskiy]

Quote: Vladimir61

Russia needs peace, tranquility and movement forward!

How much has the ruble collapsed in relation to the Baksik over 20 years of "calm" situation? And the prices? Wangyu that in a couple of years we will catch up with the Yeltsin defaults in inflation if there is such a "calm situation"

[Elephant]

Quote: Vladimir61

Russia needs peace, tranquility and movement forward!

And you also need someone who will kick to accelerate ...

[BARKAS]

Then Stalin is needed, and then SMERSH may not be needed.

[vkl.47]

The Internet is a zombie 2.0. Propaganda

[PSih2097]

Quote: RUnnm

Not quite so ... Russia needs a new SMERSH!

And what does the old one do not suit you?

Quote: tovarich-andrey.62goncharov

SMERSH - for the duration of hostilities.

Well, the military counterintelligence and in peacetime found work and not only for the military and spies, but also for the party ...

[Terenin]

"Russia needs a new Gorbachev"

So, so, interesting, although it seems not Friday. Mother Azhgikhina, but you can, so to speak ... see everyone at once, and ... prices. Oh, then oats are expensive today

[Vend]

For such authors, money does not smell.

[V1er]

The country will not survive another Gorbach.

[Aleksandr1971]

Better to let the new Gorby appear in the States.

[Pavel57]

Gorbachev on their head in an era of change.

[Reserve buildbat]

We don't need a new Gorbachev. Return the old one - at least we will hang it humanly. For the edification of all other similar Judas and this azhgikhina, or whatever her mother is ...

[dauria]

Return the old one - at least we will hang it humanly

Do not compare Gorbachev with Judas. Not worthy. Judas finally threw down 30 pieces of silver and strangled himself. Himself.

[Beby]

Well, in this regard, everything is not lost with Humpback yet - he is still not dead, so he has the opportunity to strangle himself. Although, of course, it is doubtful.

[Crimean partisan 1974]

Return the old one - at least we will hang it humanly. ....... transcripts, but I propose, as it was already in Russia with False Dmitry, ashes to the cannon and in the direction of the speech of the polite shmalnu, and with the marked one. can be hung by human. then clone and shoot. send the ashes from a cannon to his beloved Germany

[depressant]

"Let's hang like a human" - she laughed for a long time)))))
Great and mighty Russian language!

[Poetry]

I wonder where the survey was conducted about Putin's rating. Not otherwise than at the entrance to the HSE.

[RUnnm]

Yes Levada Center - the most unwelcoming and handshake sociologists))) nothing new.

[Vladimir61]

How deep I dug! And why did the "holy trinity" from Belovezhskaya Pushcha not suit the Western elites?

[Pavel57]

Few people remember, but when Gorbachev threw Yeltsin into disgrace, he went to the States for a bride, apparently liked him.

[23424636]

Journalists are slowly becoming the 5th column of the State Department. Here in Minsk, Semen Pegov was screwed up and all the brothers howled, screamed - they were beating ours. Magazine Ogonyok under the notorious Russophobe Korotich, who, together with the editor of Moscow News Yakovlev, worked for the State Department, humiliating the honor and dignity of many generations of Soviet people, praising Gorbachev and his policy of destruction ... This lady did not go far from them. And for such an article you have to ask - what kind of Gorbachev do you need, who is Kortavi or who has Israeli citizenship or, at worst, Spanish citizenship. This is the purpose of these pseudo scribblers fed by foreign influence funds.

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: 23424636

the purpose of these pseudo hacks is to feed the funds of foreign influence.

The previous goal - the collapse of the USSR - has been achieved. Gorbachev was awarded the medal "For Victory in the Cold War".
It is a pity that he has not yet been buried with her. Somewhere in Arlington. Away from Russia.

The next goal is the collapse of Russia. Under it, the bastards began to bring the base and feed the performers.

[depressant]

But an amendment to the Constitution was included on the impossibility of alienating territories. And already in accordance with it, the law on extremism 114-FZ was changed. Anyone who opens his mouth will be recognized ... The main thing is that the FSB should work, and the first person would not ask you to treat the demand for autonomy with understanding. In general, as you think, we are loosely arranged, loosely.

[Igor Polovodov]

Russia needs not demonized Stallin! But with such material, this "lady" would not have been allowed into any Russophobic edition))

[Prisoner]

How much is a "Russian author" when this is clearly anti-Russian scum?

[tralflot1832]

Judging by the jobs of the journalist, there is a clear degradation. The readers are fewer and fewer. Setaki how much has grown from those born in the 90s who are ready to go to America for cookies. They hope that they will get to the trough with American dead presidents. Wait, at best, I smoke in the forehead. you will get it from the occupier. But it will not come to that. Our friends, the Army and Navy, will not let Russia fall apart. We’re too late. The armed forces will be against their reduction .

[svp67]

Russian author for the US press: "Russia needs a new Gorbachev"

To the Russian author for the US press: "Yes, what would you live on one salary, the minimum ..."

Nadezhda Azhgikhina previously worked for the Ogonyok magazine, as well as for the Komsomolskaya Pravda, Nezavisimaya Gazeta and others.

Better performance is not necessary ...

[parusnik]

The government already has enough "Gorbachevs" ... where else ..

[agoran]

Hmm, that's such a crap on TV channels, under Stalin, they would have spoken about the execution article.
Perhaps it’s time to clean up the liberals to "nail".
The "new Gorbachev" has not yet been hanged by the balls in the Kremlin square.

[Alexga]

I catch myself thinking that Gorbachev’s personality is not at all interesting to me, somehow disappears from my memory. So trifle unworthy of memory.

[Morglenn]

What's the news? Someone out there somewhere blurted out something. Do not clog the news feed.

[rocket757]

Shaw here to discuss? How to discuss here?
We would not have here such a "caring, well-bred mommy", now the phrases are volatile and very understandable, as in the direction of their media, this nenor p p balanced lady, and the one marked with a wave would be covered, again!
However, she would go out into the street with her opinion / proposal .... she would not go far from the starting point, not very far, as it seems to me!

[MakStVik]

It is the United States that needs a new Gorbachev for Russia. And we don't need it. Have ate in due time.

[taiga2018]

"The protests in Khabarovsk took the Kremlin by surprise." Yes, just for the first time in the Kremlin they acted wisely - if they walk the streets peacefully, do not make riots, then let them walk until they get bored, since in any state that considers itself civilized ...

[agoran]

The USA needs a local "Gorbachev".
Stripes, suggest nigga, our hackers will help you.
No Fuli?
Trump was elected, all of London is new.
Any whim for your dengi.

[tovarich-andrey.62goncharov]

The identification number on the back of this lady is "enemy of the people." With all that it implies. SMERSH - for the duration of hostilities. And so - the Office of Deep Drilling ... And, it seems, no options.

[Well done]

New ?! The old one was enough for me. Tenacious ... In short, no words.

[agoran]

And he will not die, even in hell they do not want to accept the bastard with a "consensus".

[Newven]

We will bury the second Gorbachev alive.

[agoran]

I’m waiting for ok "Gorby" to die, I’ll come and go to his grave.

[Dimy4]

It is necessary to give the Americans their ex, let them carry out perestroika.

[cheburator]

With great pleasure we will present this hunchback-marked one to you! So that it was so "good" for you, as with this nit it was for us! Russia needs V.V. Putin is our president, my pride! We are Russians, God is with us!

[APASUS]

Ms. Azhgikhina never explains why Russia “needs a new Gorbachev”. If it is about glasnost, then there is more than enough of this glasnost and freedom of speech in Russia and about Russia today.

Freedom of speech - as the main part of a rich and prosperous state, as I understand it, Mrs. Azhgikhina? But the paradox is that some of the states where there is no freedom of speech in principle, the population lives richer than in Russia (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, etc.)

[Knell wardenheart]

God bless her with freedom of speech, we have a low economic culture of the population and a wide state-controlled sector, including the media - in this situation, you can at least get around freely, it will take forever to cover and comprehend any of the most insignificant problems in the inspired ocean of lies and disinfections.
What we really need is the transparency of public spending at all levels, at the end of each presidential term, public hearings "opposition against the president" before the new term, and finally - a culture of responsibility of the highest officials of the state, which implies that every high-ranking official should not go away from acute issues concerning his property or activities - and this should be done in the State Duma and also publicly. What we usually call "freedom of speech" is simply a pluralism of opinions for the most part. And we need exactly the Right.

[APASUS]

Quote: Knell Wardenheart

What we really need is transparency of public spending at all levels, at the end of each presidential term, public hearings "opposition against the president" before the new term, and finally - a culture of responsibility of the highest officials of the state, which implies that every high-ranking official should not avoid acute his property or activities - and this should be done in the State Duma and also publicly.

I read the first sensible comment (as I understand it from Belarus)
In fact, you will not be able to break anything with such methods, you need to elect your representatives to power, only in this way, having a legislative initiative, you can change the rules.
In the meantime, I see an attempt at another "revolution", do you understand that yourself?

[Knell wardenheart]

God bless her with Belarus, I am not worried about the problems of the now sovereign fragments. That's what sovereignty is for them to decide for themselves. I am from Russia and I am worried about Russian problems - why do we live in 2020 (like "strategy 2020", etc.), where are the results of that verbiage that has been pouring from every crack of the year since 2008 - and who will be responsible for it. Usually, in any activity, success is determined by a very specific set of parameters - they also show the scale of success - small, medium, large, grandiose. Discussing problems in society is certainly great and cool, but now we are at the point where the state denies the existence of problems and indulges society with them - and society eats and does not delve into. There is nothing to discuss if there is no adequate statistics, one solid linden and lured institutions for compiling this linden, which spend taxes. For "linden" should be tried and imprisoned, the opposition should criticize, success should be determined by the volume of milk and meat and not by the roar of fanfare - this is what we can come to without revolutions.

[businessv]

Quote: Knell Wardenheart

What we really need is transparency in government spending at all levels

So they are transparent today. Duma members receive 400K rubas, they do not drip over them, and they are ready to vote for this amount for any law that the current government offers them. So please think about what is more important to us than transparency, colleague!

[Knell wardenheart]

How much tax money has been spent on a senseless heap of constitutional amendments? What amounts of funds have been allocated for the Russian Lunar Program, who made the plans, why did the deadlines "go so far" and were such "gliders" punished? What amount of funds is allocated for benefits of all types for deputies of the state? duma, members of the Federation Council in excess of their official salaries? What funds are allocated to the official parliamentary parties for political activities - who determines the allocation of these funds and by what criteria and from what funds? And there are many more similar questions on the sidelines - they will not find an articulate answer. There are a lot of noodles, but the numbers generally don't agree. When the numbers do not agree - in a normal society this is a reason to start a good, big business with a showcase auto-da-fe - and in our country it is in the order of things. It shouldn't be ..

[businessv]

Quote: Knell Wardenheart

How much tax money has been spent on a senseless heap of constitutional amendments?

You're looking too far, colleague! First, see who pays our parliamentarians and you will immediately have fewer questions! You can see the amount of funds for the Duma here http://duma.gov.ru/finances/costs/ almost all the questions you are interested in are in the public domain, but why these costs are so huge and uncontrolled by anyone, it is much more interesting and important!

[Knell wardenheart]

That is why I point out that public institutions should have the right to form such questions. The existing political system has a sufficient number of people for this, sufficient funds and a completely saturated structure - however, it does not provide for such a function. Why is understandable. Good questions are followed by "who is to blame?" followed by the famous "What to do?" ... However, questions tend to accumulate until the moment when you no longer want to ask any questions, and then disintegration or revolutions begin. We went through this, now (for the umpteenth time, oh, history does not teach anything ..) at the top there is a temptation to hold the situation in hybrid ways - through information control, dissipation of protest sentiments, generation of shock content and distraction, high-target and branched power apparatus with good funding - but this is an illusion akin to building the Tower of Babel to the sky. Unable to turn into a constructive or destructive form, the protest will simply take on new forms, sooner or later leading to a natural result - revolution or disintegration. This can go along the path of the withdrawal of capital and minds, the ramification of kleptocratic and clan tendencies, the expansion of the tools for the production of a statistical "linden" at the local level - there are a lot of options. The bottom line - we have already passed to 1991. This is not a question of satisfying the liberal itch in the loins - it is a question of the viability of our state now, it seems to me.

[businessv]

Quote: Knell Wardenheart

This is not a question of satisfying the liberal itch in the loins - it is a question of the viability of our state now, it seems to me.

You are right, this is certainly true, but GRU Colonel V.V. Kvachkov, in his book "The Russian Revolution is Inevitable", which he wrote in prison. Briefly, you can find it here https://knigago.com/books/nonf-all/nonf-publicism/255243-vladimir-vasilevich-kvachkov-russkaya-revolyutsiya-neizbezhna/ Unfortunately, he is right on almost all points. Unfortunately, because we would like a peaceful, evolutionary transition of Russia to prosperity, but the existing government has destroyed peaceful ways to implement this - there are no independent courts and there is no independent electoral system.

[Knell wardenheart]

No, Gorbachev would be out of topic. A person who talked a lot and launched a lot of some epic and high-profile cases, but in the end everything faded to 0 and after that he walks like a gogol - we don't need such a person.

[businessv]

At the same time, in her article, Ms. Azhgikhina does not explain why Russia “needs a new Gorbachev”.

Most likely, this personality stuck in the late 90s cannot explain it herself. Only this can explain such a love for the stars and stripes enemy of Russia.

[akarfoxhound]

Dear editors of VO, why do you regularly advertise an unknown liberal peasant with their fabrications, eh?

[PSih2097]

Quote: akarfoxhound

Dear editors of VO, why do you regularly advertise an unknown liberal peasant with their fabrications, eh?

And so that there was "the semblance of versatility of views (like the" elephant "and the" donkey ")" - that is, liberalism - as I understand it ...

[Vladimir Mashkov]

This allegedly Russian Azhgikhina is lying: Russia does not need either a new or an old Gorbachev. The traitors "Gorbachevs" are urgently needed by the Americans and the West!

[maiman61]

No really! The USA needs a new Gorbachev! To make this cesspool die!

[PSih2097]

Russian author for the US press: "Russia needs a new Gorbachev"

Russia needs old I.V. Stalin and the NKVD (with all the people's commissariats) under the leadership of L.P. Beria.

[Escobar]

But Russia certainly does not need "effective" managers who miss deadlines, squander budgets, fill up scientific developments just to fill their pockets. With such employees, no enemies are needed, they will ruin everything themselves.

[tank64rus]

Russia needs a new Stalin, but Lavrenty Palych will not be superfluous.

[iouris]

So after all, Georgia is gone. You can only count on some Saakashvlili. He is also a successful master in his own way.

[petrol cutter]

I personally strongly agree with the last paragraph of the article.

[opuonmed]

yeah, what would the Russian Federation collapse into small states but figs they do not need such a person!

[Dikson]

Who needs a new Gorbachev? Let them first find a new Margaret .. And then, you know, it didn’t work out nicely - Michal Sergeevich didn’t have time to sell everything for cheap .. He promised, but failed .. EBN, as that also promised more, but fell on a glass and dashingly left the answer , and the next one, in general, put his Munich speech on all the contracts .. it turned out ugly .. I need a new Juda .. like Chubais .. he is ready to sell everything - if only the gesheft was normal ..

[The Siberian barber]

I'm afraid the country will not stand the second marked

[iouris]

Those. she calls for the beginning of the disintegration of the RF. Knows something.

[Indifferent]

Feminism of the brain of Mrs. Azhgikhina is not treated. This is already a pathology !!!

[Ryaruav]

we didn't have time to hang one more, why do we need another traitor at the highest level there we have a room full of exactly the same

[pafegosoff]

Gorbacheff?
Underdeveloped Russia?
And New Yeltsin and New Chubais?
23%? Well, maybe the incomplete intelligentsia has it ... But the country does not consist of an incomplete intelligentsia. I mean, not everyone is the "brain of the nation", and the men are still left ...

[viktor_ui]

Back in the 90s? Ms. Azhgikhina ... where the fuck are you getting on (Professor Preobrazhensky)? Sharikov's litter.

[Nikolaevich I]

"Russia needs a new Gorbachev" ??? Rather ... the United States needs a new betrayal of Russia!

[Romanenko]

We do not need new traitors, they are already enough. Guardians are needed, that's who the problem is.

[Ivan Tixiy]

Russia needs Gorbachev only in a noose with a sentence in its teeth

[Zaurbek]

RF is not the USSR ...... what will propaganda do? Capitalist system, speak and write what they want, go wherever they want.

[1536]

One got away with it and the other can get away with it, since there is such a precedent. Hence such conversations of various kinds of "journalists". In truth, "The sleep of reason gives rise to monsters."

[akunin]

Chekist may be
only a person with
cold head
warm heart and
clean hands.

F.E. Dzerzhinsky

we remove the "Chekist" - we put the "leader of the country" and remember Lenin's about the role of personality in history. Gorbachev into the furnace

[Sarcasm]

Quote: V1er

Quote: RUnnm

.Russia needs a new

Russia needs a new Stalin, Peter I, it needs reformers who know what they are doing, do the right thing, get a positive result, are not afraid of the opinions of other countries and the inner rich.

To put it simply, Russia needs a statist who relies on people like him in society. But this is not just a matter of the personality of the first person, there were many of them, there are and there will be. It is necessary that we, for the most part, vomit our brains and get rid of the infection, sorry, vomit, with which they have been contaminated with us. We are in blinders and we are shown only two paths - either behind the feeble-minded princeling who stole with the boyars, or behind the corrupt and alien liberal curly-haired “shtetl intelligentsia”, which could not show its nose in the Empire and turned around with its fall, penetrating everywhere and taking root well .
All these wretched people and their puppeteers are afraid of their nightmare, that suddenly, having taken off the blinders, we will return to our path, which we have walked for many centuries, but past which they want to lead us by the bridle, and then send us into the abyss.

Give them a second Gorbachev - they sleep and see how, having collapsed according to the USSR scenario, we will shrink to the size of the Moscow Kingdom, and they will send embassies to new small principalities and appoint princes there.

We must always remember that no matter who came from the West, even if they were enemies there, one against the other, on our lands they always wanted only one thing: the FRACTURE of Russia into many small fragments. We didn’t believe in this, we considered it propaganda in the USSR, which arose from the ruins and practically within the borders of the Russian Empire, but now here is the proof, in our yesterday’s provinces, volosts and districts the descendants of the Teutons and Crusaders are rolling out on tanks and infantry fighting vehicles.
Stalin was more likely not even a communist, but an imperial, he quickly realized and transferred the country to the rails of the empire, refusing expansion, where Russia would become a tool and consumable material for external forces, this is precisely the reason for the hatred and fear even of his shadow, the dirt that local agents of influence have been pouring in for decades. It’s not about the ideology of the communists, that’s aside, although it was impossible to so easily abandon all those achievements of our fathers and grandfathers, exchanging everything for chewing gum and AdidOs pants, it’s about transmitting the spirit of justice, and about example. The biggest fear is the emergence and coming to power in our country of a new generation of statists, regardless of what ideology they will broadcast - left or right.

The very idea that such forces can come to power in our country, and even by bringing forward an extraordinary personality, eats them up like an ulcer and gives them no rest. Take a closer look, as soon as you give them a hint or remind them of the past, they begin to rage and go into hysterics, be it our locals, or their owners and their mongrels abroad.

[Antonio_Mariarti]

Russia needs a unified society, because when some want to return Stalin so that he will shoot others, others want to build a democratic society like the Western way of life - this will not lead to good things if there is no confusion. After all, how can you build a country when people inside are ready to rip each other’s throats out?

[Valerikk]

Russia needs a new Gorbachev

We don't need it! We haven't run out of the old one yet

[tralmaster]

It’s the stars and stripes who need Gorbachev. And Putin will do for us. And in Khabarovsk, apart from the liberals gathered from almost the entire country, no one else goes to the demonstrations.

[synodontis]

Everything seems clear to me: The scheme has already been worked out. Russia needs a think tank (in the 90s there was one in the USA and Britain) and the “Reds” Chubais and Gaidar (who know what needs to be done and how to achieve it). Nothing will work without a think tank, just as nothing will work without active, self-confident performers.

[NF68]

The author tries for 30 pieces of silver.

[ZVS]

I read that this correspondent worked for Novaya Gazeta and immediately realized that this was a lady from the fifth column of Russia.

[bzbo]

One more Georgian in the leadership of Russia and the entire opposition will be killed...