Military Review

The Ministry of Defense named the conditions for the use of nuclear weapons

85
The Ministry of Defense named the conditions for the use of nuclear weapons

Russian nuclear potential will be used in the event of any missile attack on Russian territory. This is stated in the article "On the Foundations of the State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Field of Nuclear Deterrence", which was prepared by the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces. The article was published in the Krasnaya Zvezda newspaper.


It follows from the article that any missile fired at Russian territory will be positioned as carrying a nuclear warhead, since there is no way to establish whether it is a nuclear missile or not. At the same time, the General Staff emphasizes that the task of destroying Russia will be considered as the enemy's goal. In this case, the military will determine the scale of the response.

It is explained that Russia has marked "red lines" through which one must not cross, therefore the use of Russian nuclear weapons against the enemy in the event of a nuclear strike, no one should raise questions.

If a potential adversary decides to do this, the answer will be devastating.

- declared in the Ministry of Defense.

Recall that on June 2 this year, Russian President Vladimir Putin approved the "Fundamentals of State Policy in the Field of Nuclear Deterrence." According to the document, Russia considers nuclear weapons exclusively as a deterrent, but will use them in case of aggression.

A potential adversary should be aware of the inevitability of retribution for aggression

- emphasized in the document.
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Victor_B
    Victor_B 7 August 2020 08: 56 New
    15
    A potential adversary should be aware of the inevitability of retribution for aggression

    For fucking!
    And the Americans really don't like the "dead hand" ...
    1. KAV
      KAV 7 August 2020 09: 16 New
      25
      This article is not casual. Apparently, a message to someone who is already really considering an attack on the Russian Federation.
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 7 August 2020 09: 46 New
        +7
        Quote: KAV
        who are already really considering an attack on the Russian Federation.

        The Yankes have long been hatching plans for a massive strike of the CD with ordinary BG on vital objects of Russia, in the hope that they will also be answered with ordinary ones. Now maybe they will think 100/500 times.
        1. military_cat
          military_cat 7 August 2020 10: 10 New
          -1
          Such articles appear once a quarter, no one even remembers them. The last time was in early June:

          https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2020/06/02/831728-putin-utverdil-spisok-opasnostei
          1. HUNTERDON
            HUNTERDON 7 August 2020 10: 33 New
            +8
            it is better to remind once again that the memory is not short
            1. military_cat
              military_cat 7 August 2020 10: 57 New
              -4
              This usually works the other way around. The first time the effect is there, but the second and further - not very much.
            2. mvg
              mvg 7 August 2020 19: 33 New
              0
              remind once again

              There is such a story about a shepherd and wolves ...
          2. Interlocutor
            Interlocutor 7 August 2020 11: 32 New
            +3
            Such articles appear once a quarter, no one even remembers them. The last time was in early June:


            This is a good frequency for articles.
            We remember and appreciate this decision.
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 7 August 2020 11: 00 New
        +4
        Quote: KAV
        This article is not casual. Apparently, a message to someone who is already really considering an attack on the Russian Federation.

        The answer to the video of mattresses, about the impact of a hyperspeed missile on a ground target.
        The red line should not pass at the "strike on the territory of the Russian Federation" stage, but the construction of bases and the deployment of strike complexes near our borders.
        1. stalki
          stalki 7 August 2020 11: 32 New
          +1
          The red line should not pass at the "strike on the territory of the Russian Federation" stage, but the construction of bases and the deployment of strike complexes near our borders.
          And it may also happen that a provocation will be organized, not even in a nuclear version, and even from the territory of any neighbor. And there they will hang on us all the sins that do not exist. So it would be better to register immediately about the response on the territory of the FSA, no matter where it comes from. Moreover, immediately and in full. Then they will stop scratching turnips and immediately understand everything. Fight fire with fire. Want to play dirty? This is a very straightforward option. And then ours walk along the bush.
          1. orionvitt
            orionvitt 7 August 2020 12: 59 New
            +6
            Quote: stalki
            So it would be better to register immediately about the response on the territory of the FSA, no matter where it comes from.

            Read carefully the military doctrine of Russia. There it is written in black and white that in the event of a strike on the territory of Russia, the response will come immediately, including to the "places of decision-making". Where in our time in the West decisions are made in the military field, I think there is no need to explain.
            1. stalki
              stalki 7 August 2020 13: 18 New
              0
              I read in the course. I'm just tired of the blurry wording. The country must be sure that it will be the FSH who will get it, everyone in the world knows who is the instigator of all troubles. The adversary does not hesitate to accuse us of all sins and threaten and apply sanctions, etc., etc. and we chew snot again. Or do you want to say that we are not chewing? I am not saying that we are weak, or we are not doing anything, I am saying that everyone is tired of soft answers.
              1. orionvitt
                orionvitt 7 August 2020 13: 34 New
                0
                Quote: stalki
                The adversary does not hesitate to accuse us of all sins and threaten and apply sanctions, etc., etc. and we chew snot again

                Yes, but the conversation was about missiles, there is something to answer. The fact that the states are dumping tons of lies on Russia is clear here. The truth is clear, the US blames everyone for what they do themselves in the first place. Only who needs this truth in the world. As for the economy, everything is also very clear here. Try to confront someone if under them all world economy. Frankly speaking, it is problematic. Well, nothing, we will still fight, especially since the enemy is already mortally ill. The world "hegemon" got sick, and obesity gave complications to the entire structure of the Western world. There is either weight loss or death. Or maybe all at once.
                1. stalki
                  stalki 7 August 2020 13: 49 New
                  0
                  Oncology is difficult to treat, we have one planet and the tumor is on it and not on the moon. Moreover, in a state of disrepair. There are two options, either we stop it and annihilate it, or the whole world in Tartarus. This requires iron faberge.
            2. Alf
              Alf 7 August 2020 15: 49 New
              +2
              Quote: orionvitt
              There it is written in black and white that in the event of a strike on the territory of Russia, the response will come immediately, including to the "places of decision-making".

              I don't want to draw parallels, but in Syria they also officially announced that in the event of a strike on Khmeimim, we would hit the launch sites. Then this formulation disappeared imperceptibly.
        2. Alf
          Alf 7 August 2020 15: 47 New
          +1
          Quote: NEXUS
          The red line should not pass at the "strike on the territory of the Russian Federation" stage, but the construction of bases and the deployment of strike complexes near our borders.

        3. Aag
          Aag 7 August 2020 17: 38 New
          +1
          Quote: NEXUS
          Quote: KAV
          This article is not casual. Apparently, a message to someone who is already really considering an attack on the Russian Federation.

          The answer to the video of mattresses, about the impact of a hyperspeed missile on a ground target.
          The red line should not pass at the "strike on the territory of the Russian Federation" stage, but the construction of bases and the deployment of strike complexes near our borders.

          I agree. Only, apparently, we do not have (do not have) opportunities.
      3. VIP
        VIP 7 August 2020 13: 50 New
        +1
        The Pentagon is reading our site ?!
        1. Aag
          Aag 7 August 2020 17: 51 New
          +1
          Quote: VIP
          The Pentagon is reading our site ?!

          Yes, we read.
          Did you want to hear it (read it)?
          ... And now let's look at the minus. Let us evaluate the composition of the audience. People with a sense of humor are people filled with a sense of responsibility for the fate of the planet (but do not open the sirloin part of the body from sleeping accessories) ... Shalyu. I mock (first, over myself. ..)
          1. VIP
            VIP 7 August 2020 18: 29 New
            +2
            How Cool
            "It was I who entered successfully" tobis registered: site of the international level
            1. Aag
              Aag 7 August 2020 19: 55 New
              0
              Oh, too! Led a com! Let me taste it!)))
    2. For example
      For example 7 August 2020 09: 16 New
      +3
      Apparently the Americans are completely distraught once they are again reminded of the use of nuclear weapons.

      And the reminder is not easy. Reminder through all the world's media.

      Apparently they don't want to hear it on special channels.

      Now let them get out of the next contract.

      As one not stupid guy said: "Why do we need a world in which there will be no Russia?"
      1. Vita vko
        Vita vko 7 August 2020 09: 45 New
        +9
        Quote: For example
        Apparently the Americans are completely distraught once they are again reminded of the use of nuclear weapons

        The principle of total mutual destruction will not allow the United States to justify in Congress the costs of developing missiles and nuclear weapons. Therefore, American generals have developed and are pushing strategies for a nuclear-free war with nuclear powers or a limited nuclear war involving 3 countries. This is the origin of the development of an "instant strike" strategy - not a nuclear one, against strategic targets or a nuclear strike of limited warhead power. After all, at the heart of any war is always primitive banditry in order to seize resources. And in the case of radioactive contamination of vast territories, the whole point is lost.
        In this case, the military will determine the scale of the response.

        In fact, the human factor in the formation of response actions is 100% excluded. 10 years ago NIIIAA them. V.S.Semenikhin developed a program for the automated control system of the Strategic Missile Forces, which immediately after the launch of enemy ballistic missiles automatically calculated the areas of possible defeat, as well as the size of military and economic damage. Immediately after that, the program also automatically generated 2-3 variants of a symmetrical retaliatory strike. Naturally, all this is done in seconds and no one will check which type of warhead in a rocket flying in the direction of the Russian Federation. There are official performance characteristics from them the car and makes the calculation.
        In any case, the hair stands on end when you clearly see the imitation of a real missile and retaliatory strikes and with instantly appearing tables, damage and loss of life. I think the demonstration of this program online for the United States would immediately cool 90% of hot heads.
        1. For example
          For example 7 August 2020 09: 50 New
          +2
          Quote: Vita VKO
          I think the demonstration of this program online for the United States would immediately cool 90% of hot heads.

          I do not think so.

          They detonated TWO ATOMIC BOMBS.
          DESTROYED TWO CITIES.
          With two blows KILLED SEVERAL HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF LIVES.
          They deliberately killed the PEACEFUL residents.

          Well, remember Dresden.

          And then Korea, Vietnam, Yugoslavia.
          Other people's lives do not matter to them.

          They don't give a shit about the programs.

          If you are in doubt, then ask how they destroy their own population in the event of a threat to their own power.

          They don't care about other people's lives.
          1. Vita vko
            Vita vko 7 August 2020 10: 12 New
            +4
            Quote: For example
            They don't care about other people's lives

            Only as long as their voters do not clearly see it.
          2. Simargl
            Simargl 7 August 2020 12: 14 New
            +1
            Quote: For example
            Other people's lives do not matter to them.
            This has long been understood. Including on the lives of its citizens.

            Quote: For example
            They don't give a shit about the programs.
            And this is debatable: depending on what actions the program does.
          3. Dkuznecov
            Dkuznecov 7 August 2020 13: 23 New
            0
            As Stalin said - any problem has a very specific name.
            Regarding Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the order was given by the Chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff George Marshall, Commander of the Order of Suvorov, First Class, by the way. This is who the Japanese should judge.
            So, by the way.
      2. Alf
        Alf 7 August 2020 15: 56 New
        0
        Quote: For example
        As one not stupid guy said: "Why do we need a world in which there will be no Russia?"

        And yet this not stupid uncle's daughter lives in Western Europe .. Whether he decides to "press the button" is a big question for me personally, especially if you know about p18 of the Doctrine.

        To use nuclear weapons, you need orders from THREE people - the Minister of Defense, the Chief of the General Staff and the President. If at least one channel is missing, there will be no order.
    3. Observer2014
      Observer2014 7 August 2020 09: 57 New
      -8
      Quote: Victor_B
      A potential adversary should be aware of the inevitability of retribution for aggression

      For fucking!
      And the Americans really don't like the "dead hand" ...

      Yeah. I don’t like it. But Americans like from our elites "Dead leg" wassat This is where our elites have their "FSE"? In the West? The speeches are of course very formidable, and no one argues. And he doesn't even argue with:
      If a potential adversary decides to do this, the answer will be devastating.
      Only you probably need to take it out from under the blow at the beginning. The military has clear signs of the preparation of a potential enemy for war. So here. The speeches are formidable. There will be no war yet. Judging by the number of real estate and movable property of our elites in the West. laughing
      1. Alex Nevs
        Alex Nevs 7 August 2020 10: 56 New
        0
        The owners of the elite were prominos. If their Faberge is behind the hill, naturally they are held by the Faberge ... they are held tightly. laughing
  2. parusnik
    parusnik 7 August 2020 08: 58 New
    20
    Serious statement. Perhaps it will cool the heads of those who hope for a small nuclear-free conflict with Russia. Unfortunately, there are enough of them, and not only in the United States.
  3. Senka naughty
    Senka naughty 7 August 2020 08: 58 New
    +7
    This is all good, of course, the only bad thing is that a probable enemy today is capable of making attacks "by someone else's hands", how to prioritize "response" in such cases? If the missile mattress, will fly from the territory of Ukraine, for example.
    1. Fedorov
      Fedorov 7 August 2020 09: 06 New
      16
      Before that, there was also a document, which said that the answer would be not only on the launch base, but also on the "owner" of the weapon. In this case, in the USA. So it doesn't matter where it comes from.
      1. Senka naughty
        Senka naughty 7 August 2020 09: 18 New
        +3
        I'm not sure if it makes sense to answer on the launch base. I want to understand for myself .. If a missile is fired from a non-NATO member country (purely theoretically from Ukraine) but the launch is made by the United States, then in the long term, this means a declaration of war on all NATO members. And not only Ukraine and the United States will have to answer. And to beat preemptively throughout Europe. I understand that such information will not be disseminated in the media.
        1. tralflot1832
          tralflot1832 7 August 2020 09: 39 New
          +4
          The star has the full text, everything is chewed up. About the base on foreign territory it says and the supply of weapons is easily read between the lines. A good statement for the weekend. Let them think, if they have brains left, it reminds me of the situation before the Cuban Missile Crisis.
          1. Senka naughty
            Senka naughty 7 August 2020 09: 56 New
            +3
            The star has a full text, everything is chewed up there.

            good hi
        2. Fedorov
          Fedorov 7 August 2020 09: 41 New
          +3
          If a missile is fired from a non-NATO country (purely theoretically from Ukraine) but the launch is made by the United States, then in the long term, this means a declaration of war on all NATO members. And not only Ukraine and the United States will have to answer. And preemptively beat all over Europe

          If the next US prezik is inadequate (purely theoretically) and dares to take such a step, then I don't think that Germany and Turkey will sign this up. Do they need it?
          1. Senka naughty
            Senka naughty 7 August 2020 10: 02 New
            +2
            I don’t think that Germany and Turkey will subscribe to this. Do they need it?

            Here, now, you have completed my words. Will the United States coordinate its actions if that .. Or confront a fact .. Europe, in the last century, was already put as a bargaining chip.
          2. Alf
            Alf 7 August 2020 16: 03 New
            +2
            Quote: Fedorov
            I don’t think that Germany and Turkey will subscribe to this. Do they need it?

            According to the Chancellor's Office, NATO troops (read US) are not under the control of the state authorities of the host country. To put it simply, no one will ask the Merkelikha.
        3. sir.jonn
          sir.jonn 7 August 2020 09: 43 New
          0
          Quote: Senka Mad
          purely theoretically from Ukraine

          And for this there is an earlier statement from the President of Russia about a strike in the event of an attack on decision-making centers.
      2. churka
        churka 7 August 2020 09: 27 New
        0
        Quote: Fedorov
        So it doesn't matter where it comes from.

        It is important who will return.
    2. KCA
      KCA 7 August 2020 09: 10 New
      +3
      But now let them sit and think, otherwise they rush with their "Neptune" like a chicken and an egg, threatening to blow up the bridge, then sink all the ships, then something else
    3. kventinasd
      kventinasd 7 August 2020 09: 29 New
      0
      Quote: Senka Mad
      This is all good, of course, the only bad thing is that the probable enemy for today is capable of making attacks by "wrong hands"

      It's simple. It's just that these same other people's hands must be cut to the root, then the initiators will have a lesson.
      Let them squeal further there overseas.
    4. Kart
      Kart 7 August 2020 09: 39 New
      -1
      Quote: Senka Mad
      If the missile mattress, will fly from the territory of Ukraine, for example.

      According to this scheme, it does not matter whose rocket it is.
      It matters where it comes from.
    5. Inorus
      Inorus 7 August 2020 10: 23 New
      +1
      On decision-making centers, it seemed like it was promised ... And not only on launch sites
    6. halpat
      halpat 7 August 2020 10: 53 New
      +1
      Quote: Senka Naughty
      This is all good, of course, the only bad thing is that a probable enemy today is capable of making attacks "by someone else's hands", how to prioritize "response" in such cases? If the missile mattress, will fly from the territory of Ukraine, for example.

      So the answer has already been. I will not vouch for the accuracy of the quote: "Retaliatory strikes will be delivered to the decision-making centers."
      It is on the topic of all sorts of local ... low power ... and so on, so on.
      And even more was said: "We will go to heaven, but they will simply die."
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 7 August 2020 09: 02 New
    20
    Someone doubted the determination of the Supreme? That is why amers need to change it ... at any cost. Ideally - on Gorbachev-like, in order to safely "defuse" nuclear arsenals ... threatening the EXISTENCE of the US ...
    1. Alien From
      Alien From 7 August 2020 09: 17 New
      +4
      I agree with you! At the mention of a marked one and the like, fists begin to itch !!!
  5. akunin
    akunin 7 August 2020 09: 03 New
    +8
    Neither subtract nor add. I completely agree with the General Staff and the President (Supreme).
  6. Cruorvult
    Cruorvult 7 August 2020 09: 05 New
    +4
    Roman Skomorokhov did not like :-D
  7. LeftPers
    LeftPers 7 August 2020 09: 07 New
    +1
    This is the right thing to not even dare to think, and no "concerns".
  8. Poetry
    Poetry 7 August 2020 09: 09 New
    +3
    No help, no shelters with concrete,
    Not these generals from the General Staff.
    There will be no them, Moscow and Washington.
    A global leader.
  9. Vikxnumx
    Vikxnumx 7 August 2020 09: 25 New
    +2
    I want to understand for myself .. If a missile is fired from a non-NATO member country (purely theoretically from Ukraine) but the launch is made by the United States, then in the long term, this means a declaration of war on all NATO members.

    "I will hit in the face! In the impudent red face !!!" (from)
  10. Ros 56
    Ros 56 7 August 2020 09: 26 New
    +3
    Greetings to the striped and their lackeys, such as Poles, Tribals and other hominy.
  11. paul3390
    paul3390 7 August 2020 09: 27 New
    +4
    The position on goals is not very clear. For example, in the event of a conflict with the United States, what will happen to their bases in foreign territories, from which no aggressive actions have yet been committed? IMHO - here it is necessary to clearly and clearly say, ANY US base will be vitrified, and at the same time - the goals in the host country, as a priori hostile. That is, what will happen to the States - we'll see, but let's say all the shelling like the Baltic states, Poland, Romania, etc., with such joy providing bases to the Americans - will turn into one big flat parking lot. Maybe we can fix their brains like that? Otherwise it looks like they sincerely hope to get away with something if something happens.
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 7 August 2020 09: 42 New
      +1
      Re-read in the star, there is a huge article. All who will have a US base on hectares of their territory will be raked up.
      1. paul3390
        paul3390 7 August 2020 09: 44 New
        +1
        Yes - but it must be necessary and intelligible to explain to all our former brothers in mind .. Otherwise, they seem to have some kind of illusion in this regard ..
    2. Andrey Grad
      Andrey Grad 7 August 2020 10: 29 New
      -2
      about the nearest territories, which are actually Russian lands, which to return, bombing nuclear weapons is stupid. They should be processed not by nuclear weapons proactively and constantly preventing the emergence of threatening systems there.
      1. paul3390
        paul3390 7 August 2020 10: 33 New
        +2
        Well, it’s not worth it for the Baltics, but let's say Romania and Poland — very much. Taking into account NATO's superiority in numbers, creating a continuous, impenetrable radioactive security belt there may also be useful.
        1. tralflot1832
          tralflot1832 7 August 2020 10: 44 New
          0
          Poland especially, when driving a car from Germany to Warsaw, the police shook me $ 200 (racketeering us at the state level). I'm not vindictive, but the sediment remained! repeat
          1. Alex Nevs
            Alex Nevs 7 August 2020 10: 59 New
            +2
            laughing and they will be responsible for the car. One hundred pounds. Sooner or later.
  12. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 7 August 2020 09: 29 New
    +1
    I will support everyone who thinks this statement is not casual. Our General Staff has accurate information before making such a statement. The authorities in the United States now have mentally ill people, they live in a parallel world. It’s getting scary. But I don’t piss with Trezor on border, Trezor does not piss and I do not piss.
  13. Cyril G ...
    Cyril G ... 7 August 2020 09: 33 New
    0
    It follows from the article that any missile fired at the territory of Russia will be positioned as carrying a nuclear warhead, since there is no way to establish whether it is a nuclear missile or not. At the same time, the General Staff emphasizes that the task of destroying Russia will be considered as the enemy's goal.


    Everything is right!
  14. Andrey the Magnificent
    Andrey the Magnificent 7 August 2020 09: 38 New
    0
    And the most important thing is that the response will be not only at the place of launch, BUT also at the CENTERS of decision making !!! am
  15. Moore
    Moore 7 August 2020 09: 51 New
    +3
    The main thing is that the person in whose hands the Cheget will be at this time also has Steel Balls ...
  16. Pravodel
    Pravodel 7 August 2020 09: 55 New
    +1
    Yes, we are moving in the wrong direction. The decline of the Anglo-Saxon empire seems to be promising a big war. So it was already 2 times: 1st, 2nd world, now the 3rd world is brewing. The Anglo-Saxons cannot come to terms with the loss and loss of influence in the world, they cannot. Hence the main question: how to destroy the Anglo-Saxon empire without the 3rd World War ??? !!! Whoever finds the answer to it will be worthy not only of the Nobel, but in general of all world prizes. If only ...
    1. Wolf
      Wolf 7 August 2020 10: 32 New
      0
      You can find a way! wink
  17. Lumpen
    Lumpen 7 August 2020 10: 03 New
    +5
    One can see everything is sad in international politics if they start brandishing a "nuclear club"
  18. rusboris
    rusboris 7 August 2020 10: 39 New
    -1
    Such information should be widely disseminated by the media. In the flesh before specifying specific goals. For example the naval base of Poland. 30 kt. Air explosion. US missile base in the Czech Republic. 100 kt ground explosion. Let NATO scratch its turnips on how to calm the population of neighboring cities and towns. The states will never go to war with Russia. And let Germany and France control the little bastards from Europe. Then the goals can be reset to zero. The Czech Republic will conclude a non-attack treaty with Russia, the targets have been nullified. We signed an agreement on military cooperation with Italy, the goals were reset. To lure with a carrot, you first need to show the whip.
  19. Wolf
    Wolf 7 August 2020 10: 41 New
    +1
    If the AX is the new God in International Relations, then such a statement is normal. And the AX of the Anglo-Saxons on the forehead with Tony Blair and the Clintonoids were announced by the god of 1999 to the Clintonoids of Chirac and Cola.
    Only this article of Zvezdi must reach their population, so that they understand where they were brought, their criminal "elite" of scum.
  20. evgen1221
    evgen1221 7 August 2020 11: 10 New
    +3
    In other words, the statement of the Foreign Ministry is our country and we milk it, even if the cows rebel, we will still milk it.
  21. iouris
    iouris 7 August 2020 11: 17 New
    0
    And what will be the reaction to an attempt to establish a pro-American regime in a union state or to destroy the union?
  22. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 7 August 2020 12: 02 New
    +3
    Here every week we say this, in fact. Already probably kids in kindergarten and those in the know.
    Why waste paper if it's a no brainer - if some kind of acute situation begins - all these rules, at best, will wipe the ass in some kind of bunker or twirl a roll. On day X, a very narrow circle of people will decide how they will act on the spot and without regard to any rules.
  23. ccsr
    ccsr 7 August 2020 12: 26 New
    -4
    Russian nuclear potential will be used in the event of any missile attack on Russian territory. This is stated in the article "On the Foundations of the State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Field of Nuclear Deterrence", which was prepared by the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces. The article was published in the Krasnaya Zvezda newspaper.

    The question immediately arises whether the territory of our embassies and warships plying in the world ocean belongs to the territory of Russia - which will be spelled out in our job descriptions to those who are obliged to respond to such an attack. And how can one qualify a missile attack by some terrorists from some civilian ship that has entered our port or our waters under a false flag, if OTR missiles fly in our direction from cargo containers - then who will be destroyed with nuclear weapons?
    In general, I urge all sofa experts to discuss this delicate issue, because it is interesting to understand how our aircraft will actually react in such non-standard situations.
  24. Olfred
    Olfred 7 August 2020 13: 04 New
    +1
    If a potential adversary decides to do this, the answer will be devastating.

    "Kuzkina mother 2.0" laughing hi
  25. Shahno
    Shahno 7 August 2020 14: 14 New
    0
    "A potential adversary should be aware of the inevitability of retribution for aggression"
    And if the enemy doesn't fit your standards ..
    Russia clearly does not dictate standards if the enemy underestimates the state of affairs?
    1. Iris
      Iris 8 August 2020 00: 08 New
      0
      Your comment is not entirely clear, unfortunately ..
  26. Sergo go
    Sergo go 7 August 2020 14: 40 New
    +4
    Which of our officials will dare to throw nuclear weapons at their homes and families in Europe and the states? These statements are exclusively for internal use, against the backdrop of the rapidly collapsing rating of the authorities, to throw a shovel of old noodles to the electorate for patriotism
    1. Crane
      Crane 7 August 2020 21: 40 New
      -3
      Which of our officials will dare to throw nuclear weapons at their homes and families in Europe and the states?
      ========
      The question of using nuclear weapons is not decided by some officials.
      1. Shilka
        Shilka 7 August 2020 21: 53 New
        -2
        Quote: Crane
        Which of our officials will dare to throw nuclear weapons at their homes and families in Europe and the states?
        ========
        The question of using nuclear weapons is not decided by some officials.

        And ensigns and officers ... by a command from the center soldier !
        If there is no command, then EVERYTHING will start at the command of the "Dead Hand" rocket!

        It's better that way, but we won't get up on our knees ..
  27. Old26
    Old26 7 August 2020 15: 46 New
    +5
    Quote: tralflot1832
    Re-read in the star, there is a huge article. All who will have a US base on hectares of their territory will be raked up.

    it is better to read not journalism, but the law, which was published on June 2. Everything you need is written there, but "without water" and political nods. The original source is still better than a media article

    Quote: Halpat
    And even more was said: "We will go to heaven, but they will simply die."

    Let's leave such a statement on the politician's conscience. "Let us all die"

    Quote: rusboris
    Such information should be widely disseminated by the media. In the flesh before specifying specific goals. For example the naval base of Poland. 30 kt. Air explosion. US missile base in the Czech Republic. 100 kt ground explosion. Let NATO scratch its turnips on how to calm the population of neighboring cities and towns. The states will never go to war with Russia. And let Germany and France control the little bastards from Europe. Then the goals can be reset to zero. The Czech Republic will conclude a non-attack treaty with Russia, the targets have been nullified. We signed an agreement on military cooperation with Italy, the goals were reset. To lure with a carrot, you first need to show the whip.

    Kindergarten. Who publishes such data? Or do you want the enemy to take means of disinformation for all this, so that we hit empty places. What a mania to propose plans with the highest level of secrecy to publish in the media. For such proposals, in general, it is necessary to put up against the wall without trial and investigation

    Quote: The Truth
    Read on there.

    I don't recommend it either. Better on the official legal information portal, where the 355th presidential decree "On the foundations of the state policy of the Russian Federation in the field of nuclear deterrence" has been published. More reliable. There is a decree, and not the opinion of two, albeit respected people.
  28. 2 Level Advisor
    2 Level Advisor 7 August 2020 18: 34 New
    0
    probably the fifth article as a carbon copy on this topic over the past six months ..
  29. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 7 August 2020 18: 55 New
    -1
    Well. This is a concrete, not snotty doctrine. Greetings! And "elite" kids, families and officials themselves need to remember that the West will not save them.