Military Review

The Ministry of Finance proposed to reduce funding for the Russian nuclear industry

163
The Ministry of Finance proposed to reduce funding for the Russian nuclear industry

The Ministry of Finance of Russia came out with a proposal to reduce funding for the development of the nuclear industry for the period 2021-2023. According to the Ministry of Finance, it is necessary to cut funding for this industry by 67,5 billion rubles.


The Ministry of Finance issued a document "Methodology for calculating the maximum base budget allocations of the federal budget for state programs of the Russian Federation and non-program areas of activity", which proposes cuts in various industries.

According to this document, it is proposed to reduce the costs of the state program "Development of the nuclear energy complex": in 2021 by 2,3 billion, to 102 billion rubles, in 2022 - by 13,5 billion, to 122,5 billion rubles, in 2023 - by 51,7 billion, to 84,2 billion rubles.

The state program "Development of the nuclear energy and industrial complex", designed for 2012-2027, is aimed at maintaining Russia's status as a nuclear power and ensuring its geopolitical interests, as well as using nuclear technologies in all spheres. A total of $ 1,65 trillion has been allocated for the program. rubles.

It is noted that the proposal to cut funding coincided with preparations for the celebration of the 75th anniversary of the Russian nuclear industry, which will be celebrated at the end of August.

In addition, the Ministry of Finance proposed to reduce the costs of maintaining the State Duma and the Federation Council in 2021-2023 by a total of 1,9 billion rubles. It is also proposed to reduce the amount of funding for the state program "Ensuring the country's defense" for the next three years by about 323 billion rubles.
163 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 5 August 2020 10: 04 New
    18
    The Ministry of Finance proposed to reduce funding for the Russian nuclear industry
    fool request
    1. St Petrov
      St Petrov 5 August 2020 10: 14 New
      -18
      I rejected this offer. do not panic

      it is proposed to reduce the amount of funding for the state program "Ensuring the country's defense"

      And Shoigu against

      The Ministry of Finance proposed to reduce the costs of maintaining the State Duma and the Federation Council in 2021-2023 by a total of 1,9 billion rubles.

      agreed
      1. Simon schempp
        Simon schempp 5 August 2020 10: 19 New
        15
        I rejected this offer. do not panic

        And Shoigu against

        agreed


        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 5 August 2020 12: 15 New
          +2
          it is proposed to reduce the costs of the state program "Development of the nuclear energy-industrial complex", which is aimed at maintaining Russia's status as a nuclear power and ensuring its geopolitical interests, as well as using nuclear technologies in all spheres. A total of $ 1,65 trillion has been allocated for the program. rubles.
          it is proposed to reduce the amount of funding for the state program "Ensuring the country's defense" for the next three years by about 323 billion rubles.

          At one time, Kudrin and the "kudrinyats" also spoke about the reduction of state programs to ensure the country's defense capability, in particular, Siluanov - the same finance minister, but already in the Mishustin government.
          In addition, the Ministry of Finance proposed to reduce the costs of maintaining the State Duma and the Federation Council in 2021-2023 by a total of 1,9 billion rubles.
          We can agree with this, because they still assent to the decisions that the government makes.

          But who exactly writes laws and decisions for the Russian government? This is the most interesting!
          Alas, the laws for the Russian Federation - since the times of "Gorbachevism" and "Yeltsinism" - all have been written by the Americans - foreign special services in the interests of their countries.
          Hence the natural "bends" in the proposals of the Russian finance ministers in the other direction from the real provision of the national interests and national security of Russia.

          Deputy Fedorov: Russia LIVES UNDER AMERICAN LAWS • Dec 14. 2017 year
          1. Vladimir B.
            Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 07 New
            20
            Quote: Tatiana
            Kudrin with "curls", in particular Siluanov

            Not only they, but also the activities of Kiriyenko as General Director of the State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom (2005-2016) led to a crisis in the nuclear industry. According to some experts, today the future of Rosatom is almost entirely dependent on state support in the form of budgetary injections.
        2. Overlock
          Overlock 5 August 2020 14: 19 New
          +2

          is it like you St Petrov chelmanuli! And he didn't answer! Looks like I recognized myself
    2. vadimtt
      vadimtt 5 August 2020 10: 17 New
      28
      Well, yes, let's now reduce RosAtom to the level of RosKosmos wassat
      And then we will certainly become a cheap Euro-American gas station, especially considering the army's budget proposals.
      Ministry of Finance is clearly not Russia's ally laughing
      1. DenZ
        DenZ 5 August 2020 10: 35 New
        12
        Quote: vadimtt
        Ministry of Finance is clearly not Russia's ally

        Together with the Central Bank, by the way. This is not news and not at all funny. am
      2. Svarog
        Svarog 5 August 2020 10: 36 New
        +8
        Ministry of Finance is clearly not Russia's ally laughing

        There are no Russian allies there.
      3. military_cat
        military_cat 5 August 2020 11: 50 New
        +2
        Quote: vadimtt
        Well, yes, let's now reduce RosAtom to the level of RosKosmos wassat
        Roscosmos, by the way, was also asked to cut funding. I wonder to whom he will be reduced in this way.
        1. Alf
          Alf 5 August 2020 13: 17 New
          +4
          Quote: military_cat
          Quote: vadimtt
          Well, yes, let's now reduce RosAtom to the level of RosKosmos wassat
          Roscosmos, by the way, was also asked to cut funding. I wonder to whom he will be reduced in this way.

          Up to trampoline
      4. d4rkmesa
        d4rkmesa 5 August 2020 12: 52 New
        0
        The Ministry of Finance is a stingy "accountant", his job is such, if the cash flow is insufficient, then the owner must be warned. Most likely, current tax payments are not enough for current expenses, which is why such messages appear in the news.
        1. Alf
          Alf 5 August 2020 13: 18 New
          +2
          Quote: d4rkmesa
          The Ministry of Finance is a stingy "accountant", his job is such, if the cash flow is insufficient, then the owner must be warned.

          But at the same time he proposed to increase the content of the president ...
          1. Overlock
            Overlock 5 August 2020 14: 16 New
            +6
            Quote: Alf
            But at the same time he proposed to increase the content of the president ...

            with age, you want something tasty, toys laughing
          2. Vladimir B.
            Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 10 New
            21
            Quote: Alf
            But at the same time he proposed to increase the content of the president ...

            This is sacred for them ...
            1. Alf
              Alf 5 August 2020 17: 26 New
              +2
              Quote: Vladimir B.
              Quote: Alf
              But at the same time he proposed to increase the content of the president ...

              This is sacred for them ...

              As long as He is in power, they can live in peace. Dear father, what can I say, hope and support.
    3. Svarog
      Svarog 5 August 2020 10: 22 New
      22
      In addition, the Ministry of Finance proposed to reduce the costs of maintaining the State Duma and the Federation Council in 2021-2023 by a total of 1,9 billion rubles.

      Here it is not necessary to cut costs, although this is good, but in general to disperse these Duma members and the Federation Council. I don't see any benefit from them at all.
      And also it is necessary to reduce the costs of the president, the budget of an entire city of a million is spent per person. 24 billion a year, this is good for it .. Let him treat with understanding in this matter ..
      1. Lipchanin
        Lipchanin 5 August 2020 10: 26 New
        +8
        Quote: Svarog
        Here it is not necessary to cut costs, although this is good, but in general to disperse these Duma members and the Federation Council.

        And the bureaucratic apparatus should be cut by at least half
        1. Svarog
          Svarog 5 August 2020 10: 28 New
          +8
          Quote: Lipchanin
          Quote: Svarog
          Here it is not necessary to cut costs, although this is good, but in general to disperse these Duma members and the Federation Council.

          And the bureaucratic apparatus should be cut by at least half

          Absolutely agree. Officials, as in the USSR, when the population is 2,5 times less, and technology has stepped far forward.
          1. Lipchanin
            Lipchanin 5 August 2020 10: 31 New
            +9
            Quote: Svarog
            Officials, as in the USSR, when the population is 2,5 times less

            Even then, I was not delighted with the officials, but the current ones surpassed in terms of arrogance, incompetence, bribery
            1. Pereira
              Pereira 5 August 2020 10: 47 New
              +8
              On the one hand it is correct. On the other hand, what to do with it?
              I don't want to go to extremes. What remains? To factories? So there are few factories. And the machine operators are so-so.
              In a small business would kick out. Sewing panties, for example.
              1. Alf
                Alf 5 August 2020 14: 10 New
                +3
                Quote: Pereira
                In a small business would kick out. Sewing panties, for example.

                And the panties will have three legs ...
                1. mole
                  mole 5 August 2020 15: 48 New
                  +4
                  Quote: Alf
                  Quote: Pereira
                  In a small business would kick out. Sewing panties, for example.

                  And the panties will have three legs ...

                  Nope, three will definitely not be. Only one! Optimize production.
                  1. Alf
                    Alf 5 August 2020 16: 05 New
                    +2
                    Quote: Mole
                    Quote: Alf
                    Quote: Pereira
                    In a small business would kick out. Sewing panties, for example.

                    And the panties will have three legs ...

                    Nope, three will definitely not be. Only one! Optimize production.

                    good And they will sew that crookedly, due to crooked hands.
              2. Vladimir B.
                Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 12 New
                22
                Quote: Pereira
                On the other hand, what to do with it?

                Janitors, they won't be able to spoil anything there, probably ...
                1. Alf
                  Alf 5 August 2020 19: 02 New
                  0
                  Quote: Vladimir B.
                  Quote: Pereira
                  On the other hand, what to do with it?

                  Janitors, they won't be able to spoil anything there, probably ...

                  Shovels and brooms will either break or love or become crooked revenge ... Or they say, the asphalt is not the same.
          2. DymOk_v_dYmke
            DymOk_v_dYmke 5 August 2020 11: 22 New
            +3
            Quote: Svarog
            Officials, as in the USSR, when the population is 2,5 times less, and technology has stepped far forward.

            The expenditures for the use of these technologies by officials have stepped forward even more.
          3. Sacrifus
            Sacrifus 5 August 2020 12: 05 New
            +1
            Amendment is 2 times less population)
          4. Lannan Shi
            Lannan Shi 5 August 2020 12: 21 New
            +8
            Quote: Svarog
            Absolutely agree. Officials, as in the USSR,

            Nope. More. According to RBC estimates, in 2018, officials of all levels, from our guarantor to the municipal ones, and their direct servants, secretaries of various kinds and drivers, in the area of ​​2,3-2,4 million people. Plus their security, which goes to different departments. In total, the figure will easily exceed 2.5 million.
            Even if all these gentlemen receive the average salary in the country, then already the figure for 1.4 trillion is over. But they still love expensive furniture, show-off equipment, prestigious cars in state garages, etc. And also their abodes must be illuminated and heated. To cut the lawns around, and to plant flowers. And this also costs money. Considerable.
            In general, I will not be surprised at all if this brotherhood is more expensive for the country than the army, navy and military forces. More precisely, not even so. I would be very surprised if more is spent on defense than on these parasites.
        2. Alf
          Alf 5 August 2020 13: 19 New
          +3
          Quote: Lipchanin
          Quote: Svarog
          Here it is not necessary to cut costs, although this is good, but in general to disperse these Duma members and the Federation Council.

          And the bureaucratic apparatus should be cut by at least half

          With the help of 7,62x54.
      2. Kote Pan Kokhanka
        Kote Pan Kokhanka 5 August 2020 11: 16 New
        10
        There is a constructive proposal - to reduce the Ministry of Finance !!!
      3. basmach
        basmach 5 August 2020 12: 17 New
        +4
        On him, darling, just offered to increase by 89 million .. Trifle, but nice.
      4. Alf
        Alf 5 August 2020 17: 27 New
        +2
        Quote: Svarog
        Let him treat this issue with understanding ..

        "I do not understand you".
  2. Region68
    Region68 5 August 2020 10: 04 New
    10
    Well, right ... and then the presidential administration has nothing to support
    1. Deniska999
      Deniska999 5 August 2020 10: 11 New
      +6
      That's right, there is always money for this.
      1. St Petrov
        St Petrov 5 August 2020 10: 18 New
        -14
        Denisk, does Zelensky, the clown of all Ukraine, have money to maintain the AP?
        And if there is even a barn, why shouldn't Russia find the required amount?
        1. Deniska999
          Deniska999 5 August 2020 10: 38 New
          +8
          In conditions when half of the regions are on the verge of a budget deficit, we are increasing expenses for the presidential retinue, is this normal?
          And what makes you so crazy in Ukraine, we are now talking about Russia. How is it, I do not care.
          1. St Petrov
            St Petrov 5 August 2020 11: 33 New
            -3
            And what makes you so crazy in Ukraine

            I gave an example of a dung Papuan so that you would guess - that even the poor Papuans have money on the AP. This is normal. So everywhere.
            The cost of maintaining the president exceeds the cost of maintaining an ordinary employee.

            That's right, there is always money for this.

            Was that a complaint? Or what? Does that surprise you? Wonders?
            1. Deniska999
              Deniska999 5 August 2020 11: 42 New
              -2
              I did not suggest giving up financing for the AP, but refraining from increasing costs in the current situation.
              1. St Petrov
                St Petrov 5 August 2020 11: 42 New
                -7
                and refrain from increasing costs in the current situation.

                Do you know which item is the increase in the AP budget? what are the reasons?
                Are there any arguments to be against what you have no idea about?

                For me, this is just an abstraction (increasing the budget of a department). Nothing specific was reported in order to draw conclusions and think about it for an ordinary citizen. No details. Common phrases.

                And then - only proposals, which are not the fact that they will come true without adjustment. Therefore, here only with humor can one refer to some of the comments of the burning
                .
        2. Overlock
          Overlock 5 August 2020 14: 24 New
          -1
          Quote: c-Petrov
          Does Zelensky, the clown of all Ukraine, have money to maintain the AP?

          what a hangover is this? Have you mastered the title of the article?
          The Ministry of Finance proposed to reduce funding for the Russian nuclear industry
          a fortiori
          Quote: c-Petrov
          And if there is even a barn, why shouldn't Russia find the required amount?

          Can't live without Ukraine, is it already driving your teeth? Then chop wood
          1. St Petrov
            St Petrov 5 August 2020 14: 42 New
            +1
            Can't live without Ukraine, is it already driving your teeth? Then chop wood

            of course I can't. these are my brothers.

            Have you mastered the title of the article?

            in addition to the title, I also mastered it wassat there about AP as well. Try to read further than the title, and not jump straight into the comments to defend Ukraine - it is not the locals who defend it - well, if only in the comments on the Internet, like you.

            And if you call this tribe in the chat roulette, then even Banderlog spits from Ukraine laughing although it would seem that now their paradise and their time has come in Ukraine

            PS I am looking for Ukrainians in chat roulette and here - who can clearly explain to me what is the glory of Ukraine? Overlock, do you?

  3. Pharao7766
    Pharao7766 5 August 2020 10: 05 New
    26
    It would be better if the Ministry of Finance reduced the financing of the Ministry of Finance.
    1. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 5 August 2020 10: 20 New
      +5
      That would be the smartest idea. Undoubtedly.
    2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 5 August 2020 10: 28 New
      +2
      They took it off the tongue, Maxim :)
    3. halpat
      halpat 5 August 2020 10: 38 New
      13
      Quote: Pharao7766
      It would be better if the Ministry of Finance reduced the financing of the Ministry of Finance.

      It is also necessary to reduce the financing of the Ministry of Economic Development, even HSE can be abolished by entire departments and faculties, otherwise there are "huseynovy" philological sciences ... like maggots on a dead mouse.
      And such ridiculous spending as financing the "echo of Moscow", God himself ordered to stop.
    4. Vladimir B.
      Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 16 New
      21
      Quote: Pharao7766
      It would be better if the Ministry of Finance reduced the financing of the Ministry of Finance.

      Who will cut funding for the Ministry of Finance? The Ministry of Finance is the basis for the existence of oligarchism.
  4. igorra
    igorra 5 August 2020 10: 08 New
    +3
    And who will talk about Putin's omnipotence?
    1. Region68
      Region68 5 August 2020 10: 10 New
      -2
      What's wrong? Do you think Putin and the Ministry of Finance are not the same thing?
      1. fruit_cake
        fruit_cake 5 August 2020 10: 14 New
        0
        does this Putin even exist? maybe it's just a project with a bunch of doubles
        1. St Petrov
          St Petrov 5 August 2020 10: 17 New
          +1
          does this Putin even exist? maybe it's just a project with a bunch of doubles


          molded from plasticine in the same place where the Bridge was blinded
        2. Pereira
          Pereira 5 August 2020 10: 49 New
          +1
          Therefore, Putin will always be.
          1. Alf
            Alf 5 August 2020 14: 13 New
            +2
            Quote: Pereira
            Therefore, Putin will always be.

      2. Kart
        Kart 5 August 2020 10: 14 New
        +4
        No.
        This is, of course, an opening for oppos, but Putin is a man, and the Ministry of Finance is an organization.
      3. igorra
        igorra 5 August 2020 10: 14 New
        +4
        There is no absolute power. Why didn't Putin change Siluyanov, and Nabiullin in addition, when changing the government? What documents did Putin sign when taking office? And what kind of drunkard Yeltsin? Germany signed the Chancellery for 70 years.
        1. Region68
          Region68 5 August 2020 10: 16 New
          0
          Maybe because Putin is a liberal?
          1. igorra
            igorra 5 August 2020 10: 23 New
            +3
            And that too. I do not know which is better for us, Stalin's or Putin's methods of crawling out of the place that he so loves to save the West in the first place. If you remember what kind of contingent surrounds us ... There are a lot of brutes and any irreconcilable libyras, but they will not rass, like Putin, right to the wall or to the mines. History remembers everything, however.
            1. Region68
              Region68 5 August 2020 10: 29 New
              -1
              Uuuuu .. everything is clear with you, do not continue)))
              I will tell you only one thing ... First, we must learn to live according to the law ... and not reshape it for each * Father of the People *, yeah ...
              1. igorra
                igorra 5 August 2020 10: 34 New
                +1
                Never lived in Russia according to the law, but fairness. And you still have to grow and gain knowledge, and I'm not afraid of this word - wisdom. Be good luck.
                1. akropin
                  akropin 5 August 2020 10: 38 New
                  +2
                  If it's not hard, please clarify - when did they live in Russia fairly? Without Google, from your point of view.
                  1. St Petrov
                    St Petrov 5 August 2020 11: 38 New
                    -7
                    If it's not hard, please clarify the list of countries where they live fairly? Where is there no injustice?

                    when in Russia did they live fairly?

                    when did they live fairly in Ukraine?
                    when in the United States did they live fairly?
                    when did they live fairly in England?
                    When did you justly live in China?
                    When did you justly live in Japan?

                    from your point of view, are there such places? country? Or is Russia in a vacuum of injustice while the rest of the world does not live on lies?)
                    1. akropin
                      akropin 5 August 2020 15: 40 New
                      0
                      It was about Russia. For the rest I can only fantasize:
                      Ukraine - the time of the Zaporizhzhya Sich
                      USA - pre-Columbian era
                      England - never
                      China - I don't know
                      Japan - there is always justice, they have such a mentality.

                      In principle, justice is impossible if there is a managerial class, Japan does not count. In my personal opinion, justice is possible only if there is no state as a phenomenon.
                      1. Vladimir B.
                        Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 25 New
                        20
                        Quote: akropin
                        Japan - there is always justice, they have such a mentality.

                        It is generally accepted that Japanese society is a society of social equality. However, in Japan, until 1872, when Fukuzawa introduced the idea of ​​freedom and equality in his Call to Knowledge, there was no concept of justice.
                      2. akropin
                        akropin 5 August 2020 17: 29 New
                        +1
                        I can’t argue, I’m saying - I can only fantasize about the topic, without objectively substantiated facts up my sleeve. It is possible to compare Japan and Russia during this period in big matters. Serfdom was also abolished in Russia in 1861, but this did not add justice to a person.
      4. DymOk_v_dYmke
        DymOk_v_dYmke 5 August 2020 11: 36 New
        +1
        Quote: igorra
        What documents did Putin sign when taking office? And what kind of drunkard Yeltsin? Germany signed the Chancellery for 70 years.

        Good parallels. hi
  • BAI
    BAI 5 August 2020 10: 10 New
    +7
    it is proposed to reduce the costs of the state program "Development of the nuclear power industry complex"

    Against the background of proposals from the same Ministry of Finance to increase funding for the presidential administration, it sounds very relevant.
    1. Varyag71
      Varyag71 5 August 2020 10: 18 New
      +2
      14,28 billion rubles for 21 years. And according to Rosstat, every fifth child in the country lives below the poverty line.
    2. parusnik
      parusnik 5 August 2020 10: 55 New
      +5
      Wait, the Federal Law on the State Council has not yet been adopted ...
      1. Vladimir B.
        Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 34 New
        20
        But then there is such an enviable position as: "President's entourage." laughing
  • Karaul73
    Karaul73 5 August 2020 10: 10 New
    12
    Quote: igorra
    And who will talk about Putin's omnipotence?

    The tsar is good again, and the boyars are bad? Do you still believe in this tale? Grow up already. It's time.
    1. Region68
      Region68 5 August 2020 10: 12 New
      +2
      And how much life has not taught us and the heart believes in miracles))
      1. Vladimir B.
        Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 37 New
        20
        Quote: Region68
        And how much life has not taught us and the heart believes in miracles))

        Life persistently proves that miracles do not happen ... But sometimes it wants to believe in a miracle ...
    2. Kart
      Kart 5 August 2020 10: 16 New
      -3
      "Boyars" are different. How in general people are all different.
      Enough to tell the tale about the unknown power, indivisible as a monolith.
      Grow up already.
      It is time.
      1. Region68
        Region68 5 August 2020 10: 21 New
        +5
        * Boyars are different *
        Well, what kind of people he has gained in 20 years are they ..
      2. Vladimir B.
        Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 41 New
        20
        Quote: Carte
        "Boyars" are different.

        Of course they are different. Boyars are well-born, sovereigns, confidants, rich, local
        https://kartaslov.ru/какими-бывают/бояре
        But boyars always dislike commoners
  • Wedmak
    Wedmak 5 August 2020 10: 12 New
    +5
    It seems that the Ministry of Finance is working to the detriment of us and only to maintain the status gives useful proposals.
    1. Region68
      Region68 5 August 2020 10: 14 New
      +9
      The Ministry of Finance works based on how much money it has.
      And the money is getting smaller ..
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 5 August 2020 10: 32 New
        +9
        And the money is getting smaller ..

        Yeah, and makes proposals to reduce the lucrative nuclear sector and the military sector that protects the country. Super direct offer. Why not cut the army of officials and their assistants? Many of them can be replaced with a 12-line script and a calculator. What not to curb the appetites of state purchases of expensive cars and other super expensive things? Maybe you shouldn't give a pension to the same officials in 6-digit numbers, it's not clear for what merits?
    2. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 5 August 2020 10: 22 New
      +8
      The Ministry of Finance of modern Russia is in my reliable association with the terms sabotage and sabotage
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 5 August 2020 10: 29 New
        +7
        I would also add "incompetence"
        1. Vladimir B.
          Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 44 New
          20
          Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
          incompetence

          Incompetence is the scourge of our officials
    3. Vladimir B.
      Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 43 New
      17
      Quote: Wedmak
      and only to maintain the status gives useful suggestions.

      what What are these useful suggestions? Something I don’t remember any usefulness from them ...
  • Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 5 August 2020 10: 16 New
    +6
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    In addition, the Ministry of Finance proposed to reduce the costs of maintaining the State Duma and the Federation Council in 2021-2023 by a total of 1,9 billion rubles. It is also proposed to reduce the amount of funding for the state program "Ensuring the country's defense" for the next three years by about 323 billion rubles.

    But the Ministry of Finance proposed to increase spending on the activities of the president and his administration in 2021. good
    According to the document, financing can grow by 88,8 million rubles, up to 14,28 billion. In 2022, expenses are proposed to be reduced by 191 million rubles, to 14,4 billion, and in 2023 to increase again - by 219 million, to 14,8 billion rubles.
    In addition, it is planned to increase the costs of ensuring the activities of the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia and civil servants. So, in 2021, it is planned to increase by 1,13 billion, to 25,9 billion, in 2022 and 2023 - by 1,16 billion, to 26,4 billion.
  • Simon schempp
    Simon schempp 5 August 2020 10: 16 New
    +1
    Sanctions are good for us, they said.
    Sanctions will make us stronger, they argued.
    1. Region68
      Region68 5 August 2020 10: 19 New
      -1
      It's probably not about sanctions, but about oil prices, gas, and a virus ... the economy collapses
    2. parusnik
      parusnik 5 August 2020 10: 57 New
      +6
      Sanctions are good for us, they said.
      Sanctions will make us stronger, they argued.
      .... And us? laughing
      1. Vladimir B.
        Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 47 New
        19
        Quote: parusnik
        Sanctions are good for us, they said.
        Sanctions will make us stronger, they argued.
        .... And us? laughing

        And we are already strong. Pechenegs defeated bully
    3. St Petrov
      St Petrov 5 August 2020 11: 52 New
      -5
      Sanctions will make us stronger, they argued.


      in the production of engines for helicopters, ships - did the sanctions make us stronger?
      from the agro-industrial complex have sanctions made us stronger? Are the oil and gas industry and oil machine building carrying out import substitution?

      The sanctions made us stronger, says Petrov. Russia hit on the sanctions - import substitution. Of course, not everything is smooth, but the vector is correct. Stronger than steel - definitely.
  • Pattor
    Pattor 5 August 2020 10: 18 New
    +5
    Of course, there is less money, but there should be enough for critical things. Atom how can you cut and defense? Here is a Duma with the Federation Council a normal proposal to reduce finance
  • Alexander X
    Alexander X 5 August 2020 10: 20 New
    +3
    For reducing the funding of the State Duma, I am for, for reducing everything else, I am against ... but my opinion will not be taken into account ...
    1. halpat
      halpat 5 August 2020 10: 46 New
      -3
      Quote: Alexander X
      For reducing the funding of the State Duma, I am for, for reducing everything else, I am against ... but my opinion will not be taken into account ...

      do you work for the Ministry of Finance? watchman?
      smile
  • 1536
    1536 5 August 2020 10: 26 New
    +7
    It is surprising that as soon as progress is outlined somewhere, there are achievements and people, in particular young people, are not eager to leave these industries to go abroad, they immediately talk about "starvation rations" for such an industry. This is already some kind of looking glass.
    1. Alf
      Alf 5 August 2020 14: 23 New
      +2
      Quote: 1536
      This is already some kind of looking glass.

      No, this is just a course correction.
  • Sergey Retunsky
    Sergey Retunsky 5 August 2020 10: 27 New
    +1
    It seems that new appointments are coming in the Ministry of Finance: they dared to aim at the sacred!
    1. Nastia makarova
      Nastia makarova 5 August 2020 10: 52 New
      +1
      so nabibulin seems to be removed
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 5 August 2020 12: 18 New
        0
        Quote: Nastia Makarova
        nabibulin

        This is Siluanov's domain.
        1. Nastia makarova
          Nastia makarova 5 August 2020 13: 01 New
          0
          yes patrimony, but they remove nabibulin, which is also good
          1. Alf
            Alf 5 August 2020 16: 08 New
            +2
            Quote: Nastia Makarova
            yes patrimony, but they remove nabibulin, which is also good

            Why is it good? This one will be kicked out, the other one will be installed.
            Remember the landmark statement of the One Whom You Can't Name - there will be no change of course? Has changed ministers this year, has the course changed?
            1. Nastia makarova
              Nastia makarova 6 August 2020 07: 45 New
              +1
              what about hope?)))) we hope that the course may change
              1. Alf
                Alf 6 August 2020 19: 10 New
                +1
                Quote: Nastia Makarova
                we hope that maybe the course will change

                It has been changing for 20 years. Are there still such naive?
                1. Nastia makarova
                  Nastia makarova 7 August 2020 07: 28 New
                  -1
                  and now what to live without hope? spit on everything and leave?
                  her. we always hope for the best
      2. Vladimir B.
        Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 54 New
        18
        It seems that they are even going to send him as a representative of Russia to the IMF and the World Bank. But so far these are only rumors.
    2. Vladimir B.
      Vladimir B. 5 August 2020 17: 57 New
      21
      Quote: Sergey Retunsky
      It looks like new appointments are coming in the Ministry of Finance

      Nothing will change with new appointments
  • parusnik
    parusnik 5 August 2020 10: 33 New
    +4
    "There is no money, but you are holding on" (c) touched upon the state program "Development of the nuclear energy and industrial complex", the state program "Ensuring the country's defense", the maintenance of the State Duma and the Federation Council ... smile
  • Comrade Michael
    Comrade Michael 5 August 2020 10: 35 New
    -4
    I think the Ministry of Finance will achieve its goal ...
    1. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 5 August 2020 11: 16 New
      0
      Yes, of course, the Ministry of Finance will simply be liquidated and that's it ...
      1. Comrade Michael
        Comrade Michael 5 August 2020 13: 38 New
        -4
        Not. All budgets and expenses must be cut. And they will do it.
        1. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 5 August 2020 13: 40 New
          0
          Not. They won't ..
          1. Comrade Michael
            Comrade Michael 5 August 2020 13: 41 New
            -5
            And state employees will be cut. First cut, then salaries. It's unavoidable.
            1. Cyril G ...
              Cyril G ... 5 August 2020 14: 58 New
              0
              They will cut. Your advice will undoubtedly be applied to the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Economic Development, the Higher School of Economics and other guardians of killing the economy ...
    2. Alf
      Alf 5 August 2020 16: 09 New
      +1
      Quote: Comrade Michael
      I think the Ministry of Finance will achieve its goal ...

      Who can argue? In general, I have the opinion that the country is governed by the Ministry of Finance, while the Duma and, scary to think and even worse to say, the President only put their signatures under their "recommendations", giving them the status of laws.
  • Crabong
    Crabong 5 August 2020 10: 35 New
    +4
    And this with a budget surplus ... For whom does the Ministry of Finance work?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 5 August 2020 11: 02 New
      +1
      This year there will be a budget deficit of a trillion by 1,5 - 2. So the Ministry of Finance begins to go on all items of expenditure, but the final decisions on these cuts have not been made - the government may reject all these cuts, but everyone understands that the NWF is not rubber and it is not known what happened to the world economy will be tomorrow.
      1. Alf
        Alf 5 August 2020 16: 11 New
        +1
        Quote: Vadim237
        may the government reject all these cuts

        I wonder when this government rejected the recommendations of the Ministry of Finance?
      2. Crabong
        Crabong 5 August 2020 16: 46 New
        0
        MOSCOW, September 30. / Corr. TASS Daria Karamysheva /. The government submitted to the State Duma the draft federal budget of the Russian Federation for 2020 and the planning period 2021-2022. The budget for the upcoming three-year period will be in surplus throughout the entire period.
        1. Alf
          Alf 5 August 2020 19: 11 New
          0
          Quote: Krabong
          MOSCOW, September 30. / Corr. TASS Daria Karamysheva /. The government submitted to the State Duma the draft federal budget of the Russian Federation for 2020 and the planning period 2021-2022. The budget for the upcoming three-year period will be in surplus throughout the entire period.

          At whose expense will it be surplus? What else will they cut?
  • TAMBU
    TAMBU 5 August 2020 10: 37 New
    +1
    obviously "... Pan Ataman has no gold reserves ..." ... and according to the figures, the Russian Federation does not depend on gas and oil ...
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 5 August 2020 11: 04 New
      +1
      Nobody will spend the gold reserve and gold reserves as strategic funds for the worst years for the economy.
      1. TAMBU
        TAMBU 5 August 2020 11: 08 New
        -2
        this is a phrase from the movie. and my commentary, if translated into bureaucracy, means that with low prices for gas and oil, the Russian Federation is forced to cut costs even for such important industries. and according to statistics, the share of budget revenues from the sale of hydrocarbons is less than half (40%). This means that most likely the statistics are lying, otherwise funding for much less significant projects was cut. and this is a bad signal.

        PS zvr spend as they want. and we will not be asked.
  • Prisoner
    Prisoner 5 August 2020 10: 49 New
    +2
    Let the expenses for the maintenance of the State Duma and the Federation Council be reduced in 2021-2023 by 67,5 + 1,9 + 323 = 392,4 billion rubles, and the defense industry and nuclear scientists should not be touched. laughing
  • Xenofont
    Xenofont 5 August 2020 10: 53 New
    +2
    Meanwhile, the Finance Ministry proposes to increase funding for the Presidential Administration. Famously! The news passed yesterday.
  • jeka424
    jeka424 5 August 2020 10: 54 New
    +1
    it would be better to propose to cut the Ministry of Finance
  • Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 5 August 2020 11: 07 New
    0
    I would suggest cutting the salary of the Ministry of Finance in half, and the nuclear industry will not need to be touched. True, these are crumbs for Rosatom's turnover. We are talking about support from the state development programs. Not the entire corporation in general.
  • Tests
    Tests 5 August 2020 11: 18 New
    0
    Well, how not to recall the catch phrase of our Minister of Foreign Affairs: "... Sit down" "... five!" ... The country's budget planners for 3 years ...
    In Belarus, the nuclear power plant, after launch, must meet the needs for electricity not only for its own, but also for Russia and Latvia. Lithuania is vyzhivayetsya, but it also has a current in the outlet "will not be enough, not enough", but russophobia ... And could get more money from the Russian Federation for the flow of electricity from nuclear power plants in the Kaliningrad region network. There is also Russophobic Poland, which has “not enough, not enough” current in the outlet, and then Germany and the Czech Republic, there is a similar picture, but Russophobia ... close in email energy, plus there is a difference in time, it is beneficial to everyone, but politics rules the economy ... And it looks like the specialists of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation will deal with the Leningrad NPP-2 ... The Kola NPP remains to live for 9-9,5 years, the plans were to modernize it like the Leningrad NPP-2. We will push these plans, of course, but the reactors cannot explain this, they have their own lifespan ... The world's first purely civilian floating nuclear power plant "Akademik Lomonosov" is just starting to reach the planned capacity in Chukotka. But the period before recharging its reactors is 10 years and it was planned to recharge them in Murmansk. This means that "Lomonosov" should leave for Murmansk, and another "parakhod" should have taken its place. And it is not, and according to the plans of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation will not be? And how will Kazakhs enrich gold in Chukotka? And what and how will the Russian Federation be able to extract from the depths of Chukotkti without electricity? ... The Ministry of Finance experts, interestingly, know that unit No. 1 of the Kalinin NPP should die quietly in 4,5-5 years? There were plans to close it down and upgrade the station. If something goes wrong with him, it is only 350 km to Moscow and the Ministry of Finance ... And it is not far to the 1st unit of the Smolensk NPP, he was measured 6-7 years old this year ... And who is the unit No. 1 of the Kursk NPP? will he persuade to work for a couple of more years, also specialists from the Ministry of Finance? ... Will the Kursk NPP-2 be built in a year, if anything, or will the Ministry of Finance be able to do it even faster? ... Well, experts ...
  • Karaul73
    Karaul73 5 August 2020 11: 18 New
    +2
    Quote: Wedmak
    And the money is getting smaller ..

    Yeah, and makes proposals to reduce the lucrative nuclear sector and the military sector that protects the country. Super direct offer. Why not cut the army of officials and their assistants? Many of them can be replaced with a 12-line script and a calculator. What not to curb the appetites of state purchases of expensive cars and other super expensive things? Maybe you shouldn't give a pension to the same officials in 6-digit numbers, it's not clear for what merits?

    Are you, my friend, not an extremist for an hour? To offer this.
  • Rriv
    Rriv 5 August 2020 11: 36 New
    -2
    I respect the nuclear industry. But somewhere you can agree with the Ministry of Finance. This is how you could start building a nuclear power plant in the Kaliningrad region, and then just throw it up. How much money was spent? And is it still being spent?
    1. Nastia makarova
      Nastia makarova 5 August 2020 12: 06 New
      +1
      why did you leave? probably built to sell electricity, but now they won't buy it
      1. Rriv
        Rriv 5 August 2020 12: 08 New
        -1
        I had to think!
  • Dimy4
    Dimy4 5 August 2020 11: 45 New
    -1
    We turn to aspen, which does not burn without kerosene good
  • ZVS
    ZVS 5 August 2020 11: 54 New
    +3
    Amazing things are happening under Putin! The Ministry of Finance proposed adding 218 million to the presidential budget, and reducing investments in the nuclear industry! And this despite the fact that Russia lags behind other countries in the development of nuclear energy. This means that Siluanov wants to curtail developments in the field of inexhaustible energy.
    How many agents of influence that Putin has placed in the country's leadership?
    1. Alf
      Alf 5 August 2020 19: 14 New
      0
      Quote: SU
      How many agents of influence that Putin has placed in the country's leadership?

      This is not him, these are enemies ... In Russia, all the troubles are from all kinds of enemies, and all the achievements are from the Great Putin.
      1. ZVS
        ZVS 11 August 2020 16: 58 New
        0
        Here ... uk, Pechenegs again ?!
  • Engineer Schukin
    Engineer Schukin 5 August 2020 12: 17 New
    +1
    Quote: Tatiana
    it is proposed to reduce the costs of the state program "Development of the nuclear energy-industrial complex", which is aimed at maintaining Russia's status as a nuclear power and ensuring its geopolitical interests, as well as using nuclear technologies in all spheres. A total of $ 1,65 trillion has been allocated for the program. rubles.
    it is proposed to reduce the amount of funding for the state program "Ensuring the country's defense" for the next three years by about 323 billion rubles.

    At one time, Kudrin and the "kudrinyats" also spoke about the reduction of state programs to ensure the country's defense capability, in particular, Siluanov - the same finance minister, but already in the Mishustin government.
    In addition, the Ministry of Finance proposed to reduce the costs of maintaining the State Duma and the Federation Council in 2021-2023 by a total of 1,9 billion rubles.
    We can agree with this, because they still assent to the decisions that the government makes.

    But who exactly writes laws and decisions for the Russian government?
    This is the most interesting!
    Alas, Americans write laws for the Russian Federation.

    Deputy Fedorov: Russia LIVES UNDER AMERICAN LAWS • Dec 14. 2017 year

    Fedorov, NOD?))

    However, why am I surprised ..
  • Slavs
    Slavs 5 August 2020 12: 56 New
    +1
    The Ministry of Finance proposed to reduce the costs of maintaining the State Duma and the Federation Council in 2021-2023 by a total of 1,9 billion rubles

    Is your conscience awake? )))
    it is proposed to reduce the amount of funding for the state program "Ensuring the country's defense"

    Yat them at the root ... No comment ...
    1. Alf
      Alf 5 August 2020 19: 16 New
      0
      Quote: Slavs
      Is your conscience awake? )))

      What's a strange concept?
      Quote: Slavs
      it is proposed to reduce the amount of funding for the state program "Ensuring the country's defense"
      Yat them at the root ... No comment ...

      What's the problem ? All around there are partners.
  • rocket757
    rocket757 5 August 2020 13: 16 New
    0
    This is strange !!! To ignore the industry, which is one of the most, most in our country ??? fool
    Probably we don’t know much, don’t say ???
  • alien308
    alien308 5 August 2020 13: 26 New
    -1
    Destroy what works is government policy. Investment is needed to ensure technological leadership. They provide high-tech exports. Trump promised political support to American nuclear scientists. He said and did. Through agents of influence.
    1. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 5 August 2020 15: 01 New
      0
      Destroy what works is government policy.

      The conductor of which is the Ministry of Finance ..... "What is this stupidity or treason?" (P.)
      1. Alf
        Alf 5 August 2020 19: 19 New
        0
        Quote: Cyril G ...
        "What is this stupidity or treason?" (

        Dubak and the traitor usually complement each other perfectly.
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 5 August 2020 16: 31 New
      0
      In Russia this year, the budget deficit may reach 2 trillion rubles - they are not just going for cuts, but because there will not be enough money and the NWF is not rubber, only 7 trillion remains in it - in 6 months they spent 6 trillion on anti-crisis measures and the fight against pandemic and continue to spend. And the Rosatom office is not anyhow - even if it attracts more and more private investors, it issues shares on the stock exchange, it will be enough to exist and develop at the expense of one budget.
      1. Alf
        Alf 5 August 2020 19: 20 New
        0
        Quote: Vadim237
        let more and more private investors are attracted by issuing shares on the stock exchange, enough to exist and develop at the expense of one budget.

        And then they came to wave a pen.
  • spectr
    spectr 5 August 2020 16: 43 New
    0
    Probably the last industry to dominate the world. And they want to ditch her. I wonder who in the Ministry of Finance whispered such ideas. Too much coincides with the requirements and aspirations of the United States to ban nuclear torpedoes and missiles. And also an additional blow to Roskosmos in terms of developing a nuclear engine for a rocket.
  • alien308
    alien308 5 August 2020 19: 35 New
    0
    Rosatom holds a nuclear shield. Let it attract investors?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 5 August 2020 23: 18 New
      +1
      The nuclear shield is generally held by the military-industrial complex - you do not mix a civilian atom with a military one - a civilian letting in investors attracts.