US intends to "contain Russia" with sea-launched cruise missiles

August 5 2020

The United States intends to put on alert sea-launched cruise missiles with nuclear warheads. The deployment of such missiles is necessary to deter Russia, the US Department of Defense said in a statement.

The US military said that the last sea-based nuclear cruise missile was removed from combat duty in 2010. At the same time, according to the Pentagon, Russia is continuing "a comprehensive program to modernize and expand the theater of operations for low-power and tactical nuclear weapons."

The development and deployment of sea-based nuclear cruise missiles is essential to contain Russia. (...) More worryingly, Russian doctrine provides for the use of these nuclear capabilities during the conflict

- said in a statement.

Thus, according to the Pentagon, the deployment of sea-launched cruise missiles with nuclear warheads will "give an answer" to US rivals with nuclear weapons.

Recall that the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF Treaty) ceased to exist on August 2, 2019 after the United States left it. At present, the START-3 treaty is also under threat of termination; Washington, under various pretexts, is delaying its signing. There is a possibility that the contract will not be extended.

We are

Military Reviewin Yandex News

Military Reviewin Google News

For example 5 August 2020 08: 56
-9

13

22
The United States is holding Russian moneybags by the eggs.
Bucks proved to be stronger than any missile.
1. stalki 5 August 2020 09: 01
  
  10
  
  17
  
  7
  
  What are you talking about the moneybags? Where are the missiles, and where are your "bags"? Where is the dollar and where is the country's security? Well, of course, we have Putin's oligarchs responsible for everything, well, how did I forget about that
  1. siberalt 5 August 2020 09: 05
    
    13
    
    14
    
    1
    
    Cyprus takes away the moneybags. Here's a screech - it will.
    1. stalki 5 August 2020 09: 06
      
      +1
      
      4
      
      3
      
      I would like to listen
      1. Tatyana 5 August 2020 09: 31
        
        +1
        
        3
        
        2
        
        The United States intends to put on alert sea-launched cruise missiles with nuclear warheads.
        
        Something tells me that the United States already has sea-based cruise missiles with nuclear warheads on alert here and there.
        After all, the Pentagon always does at first covertly, then Washington allegedly declares its "intentions" - and soon the US will unswervingly withdraw from the relevant treaties. And not vice versa!
        Nuclear warheads are not simply brandished or warned about.
  2. Lipchanin 5 August 2020 09: 20
    
    +4
    
    6
    
    2
    
    Quote: stalki
    What are you talking about the moneybags?
    
    It's called "The Hungry Kuma, One On My Mind"
    A builder, an architect and a soldier are walking. We saw a brick. Well, who thought about what looking at him
    Builder
    - You can build a house from carpichi
    Architect
    - What kind of house, palace can you build?
    Soldier
    - Woman
    And what has a woman to do with it?
    - And I think about her all the time
2. NEXUS 5 August 2020 09: 13
  
  +3
  
  6
  
  3
  
  Quote: For example
  The United States is holding Russian moneybags by the eggs.
  
  And who is holding American moneybags by the balls?
3. Adimius38 5 August 2020 11: 53
  
  0
  
  1
  
  1
  
  all right, kids and wives of these moneybags where? of course in Western countries. As well as real estate, yachts, palaces. You can wave your finger from the screen towards the west for the electorate, but in fact the west holds the Russian elite by the throat.
nPuBaTuP 5 August 2020 08: 56
11

11

0
With mattresses, any contract is no more expensive than shit paper ...
Mouse 5 August 2020 08: 58
+3

3

0
is essential to contain Russia.

Yeah ... like we're already knocking on the door ...
Mountain shooter 5 August 2020 09: 01
+9

9

0
Deploying nuclear warheads on tomahawks is a double-edged sword. Who will now figure out what kind of warhead a lone cruise missile has. How will "all at once" arrive in response?
BARKAS 5 August 2020 09: 03
+1

1

0
How is another fence going to be built from rockets now?
Mavrikiy 5 August 2020 09: 06
+2

4

2
US intends to "contain Russia" with sea-launched cruise missiles
And what's new here?
tralflot1832 5 August 2020 09: 08
+2

4

2
RUSSIA is ready to contain the US with the help of ground-based ICBMs. What is the question. We have if that delivery is faster and more in terms of "tonnage". They scared the hedgehog with a bare ass. Sarmat Sarmatich is on the way. Better let them come up with what to call him. The governor was called Satan.
1. nPuBaTuP 5 August 2020 09: 15
  
  +4
  
  4
  
  0
  
  Lucifer will get ... Or Juggernaut
  1. tralflot1832 5 August 2020 09: 25
    
    +2
    
    4
    
    2
    
    What do they eat with Juggernaut? I like the Nullifier, it is relevant at the moment.
    1. nPuBaTuP 5 August 2020 21: 42
      
      +1
      
      1
      
      0
      
      Quote: tralflot1832
      What do they eat with Juggernaut? I like the Nullifier, it is relevant at the moment.
      
      Juggernaut will eat whoever you want ... The zeroer seems to me too vulgar ... Although ... Mattresses will go ...
    2. Nikolai Korovin 6 August 2020 19: 24
      
      0
      
      0
      
      0
      
      Well, of course. Juggernaut or, which is the same thing, Jagentakht is a Hindu god, I don't remember what exactly, but very important. His heavy statue was carried along the narrow streets of Indian cities (back in the XNUMXth century), and fanatics threw themselves under the wheels of a chariot. The dead went straight to heaven. But why do we need some strange names? A good name, for example "Bulava". It's clear - to fuck in the head so that it was discouraging. "Voevoda" is also understandable. "Dagger" - no comment. "Poseidon" is the lord of the seas. "Barguzin" - as you know, moves the shaft. "Yars" - it is not clear what it is specifically. But a beautiful powerful combination of beeches, associations with "Yarilo", "Lynx" and "Bars". "Nullifier", in my opinion, sounds somewhat amorphous, inadvertently.
Campanella 5 August 2020 09: 10
+4

5

1
However, the logic. That is, the Americans are controlled crazy, but we see not?
And they, who put the whole world in a cancer pose, control others so that they, God forbid, would not put them in a pose.
And in order to make it look civilized, they came up with a legend that they are true immaculate carriers of the idea of freedom and justice! Smiled!
In vain, gentlemen overseas, you are not eternal and the ocean will not save you.
1. Nikolai Korovin 6 August 2020 19: 53
  
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  
  They bombed Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki for peaceful purposes. Nothing personal, pure business. Dresden is a business plan test experiment, whether one bomb will replace a thousand four-engined bombers. In addition, the experience of Stalingrad suggested to them that the ruins are easier to defend than the whole city, and they wanted to give the Germans a little help about the defense of Dresden. Here, on another thread, I criticized the Germans slightly for their bad behavior on our territory and compared them with the beating of Indians in the USA, but they tell me that I should not confuse the Germans with the Anglo-Saxons.
  But this is very difficult.
  There are practically no differences in behavior towards the civilian population. It is not in the tradition of neither one nor the other to deploy field kitchens to feed the starving population of the captured city. The mentality of the electorate is not the same. Write the name of your beloved mother on board the bomber - that's in our Anglo-Saxon language. All the dead are a gift to mom.
Rostislav 5 August 2020 09: 15
+3

4

1
Already got this stupid rhetoric.
Why are they going to "restrain" Russia there?
Desperado 5 August 2020 09: 20
-8

1

9
Quote: Campanella
However, the logic. That is, the Americans are controlled crazy, but we see not?
And they, who put the whole world in a cancer pose, control others so that they, God forbid, would not put them in a pose.
And in order to make it look civilized, they came up with a legend that they are true immaculate carriers of the idea of freedom and justice! Smiled!
In vain, gentlemen overseas, you are not eternal and the ocean will not save you.

Nevertheless, the United States has a lot to learn; playing the role of the world's policeman for 85 years is not so easy. Effective management, economics and prompt resolution of issues related to the national interests of the state are what we should strive for.
1. Nastia makarova 5 August 2020 09: 32
  
  +2
  
  4
  
  2
  
  they became policemen only after the collapse of the USSR
  1. Nikolai Korovin 6 August 2020 19: 55
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    Nothing like this. An important element of Soviet propaganda since the post-war period is the stigma of the world gendarme, that is, the USA
2. stalki 5 August 2020 10: 07
  
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  
  You formulate correctly, or use quotation marks. They play the role of the world bandit, or reketer. What to learn from them, to be nonhumans? Oh yes, now the trend is such, it is fashionable to be aggressive and "cool", this is a modern look through the "Overton window". New generations are beginning to confuse good with bad.
3. bar 5 August 2020 10: 16
  
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  
  Nevertheless, the United States has a lot to learn; playing the role of the world's policeman for 85 years is not so easy. Effective management, economics and prompt resolution of issues related to the national interests of the state are what we should strive for.
  
  And what can we learn from them? How to live on an island without wars on your territory? How to make money on world wars, taking mainly financial participation in them? How to use the money earned from these wars to make your currency the basis in international settlements? How to use full control over international trade to rule the world?
  I'm afraid we can't learn anything from the very first point.
4. TAMBU 5 August 2020 10: 45
  
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  
  Effective management
  
  )) Thank you, I haven't laughed like that for a long time)
sen 5 August 2020 09: 38
0

1

1
On the basis of Poseidon, it is possible to make a carrier with nuclear cruise missiles. He will lie down somewhere near the United States and will wait for the command to launch the missiles.
Pavel57 5 August 2020 09: 46
-1

0

1
Quote: stalki
What are you talking about the moneybags? Where are the missiles, and where are your "bags"? Where is the dollar and where is the country's security? Well, of course, we have Putin's oligarchs responsible for everything, well, how did I forget about that

More precisely, the pre-Putin oligarchs are Yeltsin's.
Pavel57 5 August 2020 09: 49
-1

0

1
Quote: siberalt
Cyprus takes away the moneybags. Here's a screech - it will.

The pie is getting smaller, so you need to cut it.
rudolff 5 August 2020 09: 51
+2

3

1
The Americans are systematically withdrawing from all bilateral security agreements with Russia. The return to NK and submarines of nuclear weapons, in addition to SLBMs, is an unpleasant call for Russia. The agreement has been in effect since the 90s.
1. Vadim237 5 August 2020 10: 51
  
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  
  This return will be delayed for 10 years - the old charges will not have to create new ones for cruise missiles and tens of billions of dollars for R&D serial production.
5-9 5 August 2020 09: 58
+2

2

0
Do they have new YABCh? Or will they again renovate strategic ones for a hundred or two ktn up to several ktn?
rotmistr60 5 August 2020 10: 12
+1

1

0
The deployment of such missiles is essential to contain Russia
Russia will not remain in debt with such a step either. Another surprise is that the devil knows what is going on in the country and it is not yet known what this will eventually lead to, and they are all trying to restrain Russia. When in the American political elite there are mostly old senile people, then another cannot be expected.
1. Nikolai Korovin 6 August 2020 19: 57
  
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  
  Historical experience shows that the old senile is preferable to the drunken charismatic.
Desperado 5 August 2020 10: 41
-3

0

3
Quote: bar

And what can we learn from them? How to live on an island without wars on your territory? How to make money on world wars, taking mainly financial participation in them? How to use the money earned from these wars to make your currency the basis in international settlements? How to use full control over international trade to rule the world?
I'm afraid we can't learn anything from the very first point.

Think like a child, wake up, capital and politics rule the world. National interests are above all for the United States, it is they and their observance that allows the United States to remain the number one economy in the world. There is a lot to learn, the same unification of nuclear submarines (pr. 688 - Virginia, Ohio - Columbia) and compare it with our "zoo".
Desperado 5 August 2020 10: 48
-1

1

2
Quote: stalki
You formulate correctly, or use quotation marks. They play the role of the world bandit, or reketer. What to learn from them, to be nonhumans? Oh yes, now the trend is such, it is fashionable to be aggressive and "cool", this is a modern look through the "Overton window". New generations are beginning to confuse good with bad.

There is no need for quotation marks, a police officer is never good or bad, he just fulfills his duties. Let's leave the United States, since they are such "bad people", let's take China. Does he also fit this definition? The same purposeful policy of the country's development, the expansion of foreign markets, a tough policy of protecting national interests, effective management and economy, the search for and obtaining missing technologies by any means, etc.
iouris 5 August 2020 13: 45
-1

0

1
Why, didn't they "hold back"? The USSR disappeared from the map in 1991.
Narcologist 5 August 2020 16: 20
-1

2

3
Read the story of the Lord .. Russia can be humiliated and even part of its territory can be conquered, but if you make it angry, then no Army of the World can stop it. Want to check it again? We are preparing for this too ..
Old26 5 August 2020 18: 33
+3

3

0
Quote: Tatiana
Something tells me that the United States already has sea-based cruise missiles with nuclear warheads on alert here and there.

The existing versions have never been tested with nuclear warheads, but they are already in service. MASTER. Continue on, Tatiana. You are a major expert in this field. Do not hesitate, write more

Quote: Tatiana
After all, the Pentagon always does at first covertly, then Washington allegedly declares its "intentions" - and soon the US will unswervingly withdraw from the relevant treaties. And not vice versa!
Nuclear warheads are not simply brandished or warned about.

Actually, the Pentagon first speaks and then does. It is the same with regard to new nuclear-powered missile launchers. They will be developed and they will use charges that are still stored in warehouses. Moreover, there is no need to leave the agreement. Marine contracts did not fall under any contracts. They were removed and deactivated by mutual agreement ...

Quote: tralflot1832
What is the question. We have if that delivery is faster and more for "tonnage".

Andrew! Well, nonsense then why write. I didn’t expect such a shouting from you, honestly. Is the delivery faster? Is it that Russian ICBMs have speeds several times faster than American ones? And the tonnage - well, let's count. Russia - about 908 tons. USA - 1148 tons. Who has more? We habitually count almost the entire arsenal of the Voevod, which we had and the UR-100N UUTKh. But alas ...

Quote: Nastia Makarova
they became policemen only after the collapse of the USSR

Even before. Already in the Soviet media in the 60s and later, the United States was always called the "world gendarme". Not since 1992 ...

Quote: sen
On the basis of Poseidon, it is possible to make a carrier with nuclear cruise missiles. He will lie down somewhere near the United States and will wait for the command to launch the missiles.

Can. And shove them 200-300 pieces, no less. True, the dimensions of such cruise missiles will be 50-60 centimeters long and 5 cm in diameter ...
What kind of cruise missiles, dear, are you going to shove into a case with a diameter of about 1,8 meters and a length of 6 meters (if you remove the thermonuclear charge). And how will he shoot them? From a depth of as much as 1 km ???

Quote: Vadim237
This return will be delayed for 10 years - the old charges will not have to create new ones for cruise missiles and tens of billions of dollars for R&D serial production.

There will be. It is for this that they keep those nuclear warheads that were removed from nuclear "tomahawks"
There are not very many of them, hundreds of 3-4, but they are in storage

Quote: 5-9
Do they have new YABCh? Or will they again renovate strategic ones for a hundred or two ktn up to several ktn?

Why install new ones at once? There are in warehouses from old sea-based cruise missiles. They will be installed for the first time. Moreover, they are unlikely to rivet thousands of nuclear cruise missiles
1. rudolff 5 August 2020 22: 43
  
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  
  Since they have started talking about CD with nuclear warheads, I do not think that they will limit themselves to this. Torpedoes and bombs on aircraft carriers will also return. Although, we always suspected that the Americans were a little cunning about air bombs and did not completely remove them from the AB arsenals. As it all becomes sour from all this.
  1. timokhin-aa 7 August 2020 13: 42
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    There is one more dangerous moment. The designated storage periods for old nuclear warheads (nuclear warheads), which were installed on the "Tomahawks", have long been out, their extension is very problematic and doubtful. This means that a new warhead will be made for the new cruise missile. Taking into account the technological realities and limitations, it will apparently be made on the basis of some already existing warhead. This means that the Americans will have a whole family of unified nuclear warheads with relatively small dimensions and weight, apparently with unified interfaces (within the existing approaches to the design of weapons in the United States, this is exactly what should be expected). The question arises: where else can they (without too much publicity, by the way) install such charges? This question is very serious, and it should be addressed to the appropriate specialists.
    
    https://vz.ru/world/2020/8/6/1053602.html