Military Review

Israeli command recognizes air strikes on southern Syria

151

The information that another attack was carried out on objects in the capital region of the Syrian Arab Republic and the southern provinces is confirmed. According to the SANA news service, the provinces of Damascus and Quneitra were subjected to air strikes.


This is one of the rare occasions that the Israeli Air Force has claimed responsibility for airstrikes. Usually, the Israeli military command leaves its attacks on Syrian territory without any comment.

The press service of the Israeli military department reports that helicopters and fighters of the IDF Air Force were involved in the launching of missile strikes on Syrian territory. The targets of the attacks, as stated, were the objects of the military intelligence of Syria, the command posts of the Syrian army, as well as anti-aircraft missile systems and other anti-aircraft installations.

The press service of the Israel Defense Forces states that the decision to launch missile strikes on Syria was made "in response to the sabotage that was committed the day before on the Syrian-Israeli border."

An interesting fact is noteworthy: on the night of August 3, Israeli soldiers eliminated the militants who, intending to stage a provocation, set explosive devices near the Israeli border. Militants installed, and bombed aviation Israeli facilities of the Syrian government army. According to the logic of the Israeli authorities, Damascus, the government of Bashar al-Assad, bears responsibility in any case. By the same logic, if an Arab terrorist attacks the police in one of the Israeli cities, then it is necessary to "bomb Jerusalem immediately", because it is the Israeli authorities who bear full responsibility for what is happening in the country? ..

The Syrian military command reports that it will cause serious damage to infrastructure after the bombing. It is added that there were no casualties.
Photos used:
Facebook / Israeli Air Force
151 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Victor_B
    Victor_B 4 August 2020 06: 07 New
    +4
    When will their horns be broken off? ..
    1. Professor
      Professor 4 August 2020 06: 10 New
      -13 qualifying.
      Duc Tsakhal and breaks off.
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 4 August 2020 06: 18 New
        +3
        Quote: Professor
        Duc Tsakhal and breaks off.

        Well then, then - you!
        1. Shurik70
          Shurik70 4 August 2020 07: 35 New
          -11 qualifying.
          No one died?
          Amazing.
          Yet, despite all the orders of their command, it seems that Israel's pilots are trying to inflict as few casualties as possible.
          1. Victor_B
            Victor_B 4 August 2020 07: 37 New
            +2
            Quote: Shurik70
            Israel's pilots try to inflict as few casualties as possible.

            For pilots, this is generally parallel!
            This is the policy of the STATE.
            We are forced to reckon with the "world community" (for now) ...
            And as they see fit, they send this "public" into the erotic on foot.
            The main thing is that there are no elections on the nose.
            1. Shurik70
              Shurik70 4 August 2020 19: 38 New
              +1
              Quote: Victor_B

              We are forced to reckon with the "world community" (for now) ...
              And as they see fit, they send this "public" into the erotic on foot.

              Israel has NEVER reckoned with the "world community".
              But he always "sent".
              And the targets of attacks are always the same. Either air defense systems, or the most successful (from the commercial or industrial side) facility. Factories, trading terminals. Sometimes they justify with hindsight "there were terrorists," and more often without justification.
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Thrifty
        Thrifty 4 August 2020 07: 18 New
        +7
        Professor, "site luminary" is it easy to fight a country destroyed by civil war? You would have fought like this with your brainchild-ishil! And then they got into the habit of bombing, regional bombers. ..
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 4 August 2020 08: 57 New
          -2
          Quote: Thrifty
          You would have fought like this with your brainchild-ishil!

          This is where "misunderstandings" come in.
        2. Vladimir_6
          Vladimir_6 4 August 2020 09: 42 New
          +3
          Quote: Thrifty
          Professor, "site luminary" is it easy to fight a country destroyed by civil war? You would have fought like this with your brainchild-ishil! And then they got into the habit of bombing, regional bombers. ..

          So they fought together with their brainchild ISIS against Assad. ISIS was defeated, now Israel has to fight on its own against Assad.
      3. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 4 August 2020 08: 59 New
        +1
        Quote: Professor
        Duc Tsakhal and breaks off.

        When the case breaks "approvals", when the foolishness "condemns" !.
        1. Vladimir_6
          Vladimir_6 4 August 2020 09: 47 New
          +3
          Quote: tihonmarine
          Quote: Professor
          Duc Tsakhal and breaks off.

          When the case breaks "approvals", when the foolishness "condemns" !.

          The Tsakhal is violet with both approval and condemnation. The main thing for them is that there is no answer.
          1. borberd
            borberd 4 August 2020 13: 06 New
            +2
            Quote: Vladimir_6
            The main thing for them is that there is no answer.

            When did this Tsakhal stop? Something you come up with ... a storyteller. laughing
            1. Vladimir_6
              Vladimir_6 4 August 2020 14: 09 New
              -2
              Quote: borberd
              Quote: Vladimir_6
              The main thing for them is that there is no answer.

              When did this Tsakhal stop? Something you come up with ... a storyteller. laughing

              Where did I say that Tsakhal was stopping it?
              In Russian it is written:
              The Tsakhal is violet with both approval and condemnation. The main thing for them is that there is no answer.

              For example like this

              Something you come up with ... a dreamer. laughing
              1. borberd
                borberd 4 August 2020 15: 00 New
                +2
                You said that it is important for the IDF that there is no answer. To which I replied that Tsakhal never stopped it. For this plane, the Syrians paid much more than it cost. So what storytellers, such are fairy tales lol
                1. Vladimir_6
                  Vladimir_6 4 August 2020 18: 27 New
                  -1
                  Quote: borberd
                  You said that it is important for the IDF that there is no answer

                  Do you think it's not important? Or are the pilots of the Tsakhal consumable?
                  To which I replied that it never stopped the Tsakhal

                  And where did I say the opposite? You blurted out stupidity and are now looking for an excuse for yourself.
                  But you have a good support group. Keep writing fairy tales. lol
    2. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 4 August 2020 06: 20 New
      -3
      Quote: Victor_B
      When will their horns be broken off? ..

      Ignore this?

      The region is completely under the control of Damascus.
      1. Victor_B
        Victor_B 4 August 2020 06: 22 New
        +8
        Isn't it sabotage / terrorism to bomb it?
        1. borberd
          borberd 4 August 2020 13: 09 New
          0
          Since when has the defense of their borders become a diversion?
      2. Thrifty
        Thrifty 4 August 2020 07: 21 New
        +3
        Aaron, and what was there - the shepherds on a land mine of militants were blown up, maybe? Although it is useless to argue with your brother, you are "always right" even when you are completely wrong!
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 4 August 2020 08: 49 New
          +3
          Quote: Thrifty
          Although it is useless to argue with your brother, you are "always right" even when you are completely wrong!

          And if they turn out to be wrong, then such a high will be raised all over the world that you don't want to argue.
        2. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 4 August 2020 09: 10 New
          +7
          "Aron, what was there - the shepherds on a land mine of militants were blown up, maybe?" ///

          Not. First, they were mowed down by bullets. A group of special forces approached them.
          Did you see how they doubled over a split second before the missile strike?
          Then they fired rockets from a drone. Already over the corpses, for reliability.
          ----
          There is a neutral military zone. There are no peasants in it.
          I served in the area in the early 90s
          1. Nosgoth
            Nosgoth 10 August 2020 17: 28 New
            0
            neutral military zone
            laughing laughing laughing
      3. Hydrography Bay Golden Horn
        Hydrography Bay Golden Horn 4 August 2020 07: 54 New
        +2
        Beautifully eliminated terrorists
        1. Nosgoth
          Nosgoth 10 August 2020 17: 30 New
          -1
          The pendocs were also "nicely" liquidated, until detailed videos became public knowledge (thanks to Snowden, etc.), where civilians were ironed just in case (out of cowardice).
      4. Olgovich
        Olgovich 4 August 2020 08: 01 New
        +4
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        The region is completely under the control of Damascus.

        Are there no criminals in Israel? Is there anyway?

        Why not bomb Israel responsible for this?
      5. Vladimir_6
        Vladimir_6 4 August 2020 10: 13 New
        0
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Ignore this?

        Of course not. But why then is this
        The press service of the Israeli military department reports that helicopters and fighters of the IDF Air Force were involved in the launching of missile strikes on Syrian territory. The targets of the attacks, as stated, were the objects of the military intelligence of Syria, the command posts of the Syrian army, as well as anti-aircraft missile systems and other anti-aircraft installations.

        It seems to me that the killed militants were sent there to strike at the command posts of the Syrian army and anti-aircraft missile systems.
      6. Gavrohs
        Gavrohs 4 August 2020 16: 33 New
        +3
        Quite precisely worked out (the projectile lay down heap)!
    3. Danila46
      Danila46 4 August 2020 08: 08 New
      -4
      no-h-yes ...
    4. Looking for
      Looking for 4 August 2020 14: 48 New
      -1
      but how can a lackey break off the horns of his master?
    5. bulava
      bulava 5 August 2020 12: 56 New
      +1
      What do you mean, my friend, if there is no Israel, then there the Arabs among themselves will all just fight at once. And so it is for them, as a kind of unifying factor. Yes, and it is beneficial to us. The IDF is bombing - the Syrians are buying new weapons from us.
  2. zoland
    zoland 4 August 2020 06: 19 New
    -8
    And that Jerusalem is the capital of Arab terrorists?
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 4 August 2020 08: 40 New
      +3
      Quote: zoland
      And that Jerusalem is the capital of Arab terrorists?

      I do not know about the Arab, but I have no doubts about the terrorists. So far, Jerusalem is considered the capital of another state.
  3. Roman1970_1
    Roman1970_1 4 August 2020 06: 22 New
    -8
    So the militants were the Shiite militiamen financed by Iran. Who called Iran? That's right, Assad called. So who is responsible?
    That's right Assad.
    So he gets it. Everything is logical. This is the author's problem with logic
    1. Pereira
      Pereira 4 August 2020 08: 35 New
      +3
      If Israel did not shit from morning to evening, no one would have called Iran. And Russia would not be called.
      1. Normal ok
        Normal ok 4 August 2020 17: 56 New
        0
        Quote: Pereira
        If Israel did not shit from morning to evening, no one would have called Iran.

        Before the Islamic Revolution, Iran had a generally sane relationship with Israel. After the coup and the coming of radical Islamists to power in Iran, the Iranian leaders were the first to declare that Israel must be destroyed. It's useless to talk to fanatics.
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 4 August 2020 08: 37 New
      0
      Quote: Roman1970_1
      Who called Iran? That's right, Assad called.

      And who called Russia? That's right, Assad called. So it turns out, according to your logic, you have to bomb both of them.
      1. Pereira
        Pereira 4 August 2020 09: 01 New
        -1
        Perhaps they will. At first they were afraid, but as it turned out, the S-400 should not be taken into account. They are there for show-off, or even just dummies. Nobody saw in the case.
        So they can at any time.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 4 August 2020 09: 39 New
          +3
          Quote: Pereira
          Perhaps they will. At first they were afraid, but as it turned out, the S-400 should not be taken into account.

          I also have vague doubts, but they exist.
      2. Roman1970_1
        Roman1970_1 4 August 2020 09: 21 New
        +4
        Not. Russia does not fund Shiite militants and does not call for the destruction of Israel.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 4 August 2020 09: 38 New
          +1
          Quote: Roman1970_1
          Not. Russia does not fund Shiite militants and does not call for the destruction of Israel.

          Well, you can easily lead to this.
          1. borberd
            borberd 4 August 2020 13: 12 New
            -1
            Then you will be on a par with the Ayatollahs ...
    3. Vladimir_6
      Vladimir_6 4 August 2020 10: 18 New
      0
      Quote: Roman1970_1
      So the militants were Shiite militiamen

      You must have checked their IDs.
  4. raki-uzo
    raki-uzo 4 August 2020 06: 25 New
    -7
    They know very well when there is tea at the Syrian air defense. And there are no other options, because there are formidable Russian-made air defense systems and ALL OF THEM are under the control of tea lovers.
    1. Vitaly gusin
      Vitaly gusin 4 August 2020 07: 38 New
      -3
      Quote: raki-uzo
      They know very well when there is tea at the Syrian air defense.

      And then, according to a special program, they calculate when they go to the toilet. And they strike a second blow.
  5. parusnik
    parusnik 4 August 2020 06: 30 New
    10
    Hezbollah is over, switched to the Syrian army ... laughing
    1. Victor_B
      Victor_B 4 August 2020 06: 38 New
      +2
      Quote: parusnik
      Hezbollah is over, switched to the Syrian army ... laughing
      It never ended!
      On the contrary, it is getting stronger!
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 4 August 2020 08: 30 New
      +1
      Quote: parusnik
      Hezbollah is over, switched to the Syrian army

      The Jews don't care what a machine gun or vodka, as long as they knock them off their feet.
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 4 August 2020 06: 42 New
    +9
    The targets of the attacks, as stated, were the objects of the military intelligence of Syria, the command posts of the Syrian army, as well as anti-aircraft missile systems and other anti-aircraft installations.
    Previously, at least they referred to the fact that they were striking pro-Iranian formations, but now they openly declare that they are at war with Assad.
    1. Zeev zeev
      Zeev zeev 4 August 2020 07: 21 New
      -5
      Every time Israel was attacked from Syrian territory, a response came over the positions of the Syrian army. When a patrol jeep was fired upon, a machine-gun point was demolished, when they reached the village of Alonei Ha-Bashan with mortars, they destroyed the entire battery (and the tank that turned up at the same time), when Uragan rockets fired at a ski resort on Kherson, destroyed not only the installation itself (not the Syrian army, which is interesting), but also the Syrian air defense systems that covered it ... And only when ISIS terrorists (prohibited in Russia) put a land mine on the fence from the Syrian side, the response flew directly to the headquarters of the local ISIS, and not to the Assad army.
  7. Zeev zeev
    Zeev zeev 4 August 2020 06: 51 New
    -14 qualifying.

    By the same logic, if an Arab terrorist attacks the police in one of the Israeli cities, then it is necessary to "bomb Jerusalem immediately"? ..

    Maybe I missed something, but what does it have to do with it? Jerusalem is not the capital of one of the Arab states, Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. And Arab terrorists are acting against Israel and Jews.
    1. Thrifty
      Thrifty 4 August 2020 07: 24 New
      0
      Zeevzeev -Jerusalem is the capital of the Palestinian state, which your land was not allowed to create, by occupying and annexing, that is, simply by squeezing someone else's land! And you can rewrite history as much as you like, you have no equal in the world!
      1. Vitaly gusin
        Vitaly gusin 4 August 2020 07: 34 New
        +3
        Quote: Thrifty
        Jerusalem is the capital of the Palestinian state, which your land was not allowed to create, by occupying and annexing, that is, simply by squeezing someone else's land!

        I understand you have been taught for a very long time LIES
        The recently established United Nations Organization, at the Second Session of its General Assembly on November 29, 1947, adopted Resolution No. 181 on the plan for the partition of Palestine into an Arab and a Jewish state with granting a special status to the Jerusalem area (including Bethlehem) under the UN administration. Unlike the leadership of the Jewish Yishuv, which adopted the resolution, the Supreme Arab Committee of Palestine and the League of Arab States (LAS) it was generally rejected.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 4 August 2020 08: 22 New
          0
          Quote: Vitaly Gusin
          with the granting of a special status to the Jerusalem area (including Bethlehem) under the UN administration.

          Unambiguously, the centers of world religion should be under the control of the UN, so as not to be the precursor stone, which it is now.
          1. Vitaly gusin
            Vitaly gusin 4 August 2020 08: 52 New
            +2
            Quote: tihonmarine
            Unambiguously, the centers of world religion should be under the control of the UN, so as not to be the precursor stone, which it is now.

            You know perfectly well that Israel did not start the war and as a result of the war Jerusalem was divided and the Israelites could not approach their holy places. And only in 1967 they were able to do it. According to the peace treaty between Israel and Jordan, Jordan recognized as the keeper of the holy places of Islam in Jerusalem. The Jerusalem Waqf, the Council for the Holy Places, is directly subordinate to her. But security rests with Israel.
            Likewise with Christian shrines, each place belongs to the one to whom it belongs.
            I have not read anywhere that there are problems.
            1. tihonmarine
              tihonmarine 4 August 2020 09: 35 New
              0
              Quote: Vitaly Gusin
              You know perfectly well that Israel did not start the war and as a result of the war Jerusalem was divided and the Israelites could not approach their holy places.

              I know the history very well, and who fought for what. And there is no excuse for what you have done now. None. You can say whatever comes into your head, but Jerusalem should be a shrine, not a capital. I know that you personally are against it, but I'm sorry.
              1. Vitaly gusin
                Vitaly gusin 4 August 2020 10: 14 New
                0
                Quote: tihonmarine
                Jerusalem should be a shrine, not a capital. I know that you personally are against it, but I'm sorry.

                No need to apologize, this is your point of view.
                But I want to disappoint you, the millennium Easter prayer ends with words
                בשנה הבאה בירושלים next year in Jerusalem
                How do you understand it FOR CENTURIES
                The attitude of some towards Israel in Russia is somewhat strange.
                Although the Head of Government openly says:
                "The monument is very good. It will stay for a long time, hope for centuries. (and the monument is in Jerusalem) And you can open it in different ways. But the way you did it today ... Thank you, "the Russian leader did not hold back his emotions.
                1. tihonmarine
                  tihonmarine 4 August 2020 14: 50 New
                  -1
                  Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                  "The monument is very good. It will remain for a long time, I hope, for centuries. (And the monument is in Jerusalem) And you can open it in different ways. But the way you did it today ... Thank you," the Russian leader could not restrain his emotions.

                  I am not arguing about Jerusalem, it is and should be part of Israel, but it should not be the capital. All major plague religions are intertwined there, it is a shrine for all of us.
                  1. Vitaly gusin
                    Vitaly gusin 4 August 2020 15: 19 New
                    +1
                    Quote: tihonmarine
                    it shouldn't be a capital

                    How is the capital different?
                    There is the government of the state, there is the residence of the head of government and the president and some institutions. And all this is de facto since 1967. Everything else is political games.
                    Quote: tihonmarine
                    All major plague religions are intertwined there, it is a shrine for all of us.

                    I repeat
                    According to the peace treaty concluded between Israel and Jordan, Jordan is recognized as the keeper of the holy places of Islam in Jerusalem. The Jerusalem Waqf, the Council for the Holy Places, is directly subordinate to her. But security rests with Israel.
                    Likewise with Christian shrines, each place belongs to the one to whom it belongs.
                    I have not read anywhere that there are problems.
                    1. tihonmarine
                      tihonmarine 4 August 2020 15: 22 New
                      0
                      Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                      But security rests with Israel.
                      Likewise with Christian shrines, each place belongs to the one to whom it belongs.

                      And Israel provides security properly, there can be no doubt about it.
                    2. Zeev zeev
                      Zeev zeev 6 August 2020 08: 56 New
                      0

                      There is the government of the state, there is the residence of the head of government and the president and some institutions. And all this is de facto since 1967.

                      All this de jure and de facto since 1949.
                      1. Vitaly gusin
                        Vitaly gusin 6 August 2020 11: 35 New
                        -1
                        Quote: ZeevZeev
                        All this de jure and de facto since 1949.

                        Accepted
              2. A. Privalov
                A. Privalov 4 August 2020 10: 23 New
                +1
                Quote: tihonmarine
                Jerusalem should be a shrine, not a capital. I know that you personally are against it, but I'm sorry.

                I AM FOR".
                However, back in 1959, the UN gave up its control of Jerusalem.
                Now, it is a millionaire city. A shrine or not a shrine, but it needs to be cleaned, illuminated and cared for. Someone has to do it. The Jerusalem mayor's office is coping, but you won't be full of wishes alone.
              3. Zeev zeev
                Zeev zeev 4 August 2020 10: 58 New
                +2
                By the way, I am against it. Why should my city with a population of 900 thousand people (without suburbs) be a shrine, but the capital of my Country cannot be?
          2. andreykolesov123
            andreykolesov123 4 August 2020 13: 05 New
            +5
            Quote: tihonmarine
            Definitely, the centers of world religion

            Offer Saudi Arabia to transfer Mecca and Medina under the jurisdiction of the UN.
        2. Wolf
          Wolf 4 August 2020 13: 15 New
          0
          Gusin I gave you a plus, historically it is, in fact, quite a bit. But here is one "small" moral question: On what basis did the UN divide Palestine into an Arab and a Jewish state and on what basis did the UN give Jerusalem a special status? In Jerusalem, there are a bunch of Orthodox churches created by different states, among other things, the Serbian Kingdom and Ruski, etc.
          Rhetorically, the question is, if the UN proposed a special status for Yerusalem where the authorities were DIVIDED Palestine, Serbia, Russia, Bulgaria, Greece and Israel, would you consider it normal?
          Or in Sveta Gora in Greece, the same thing, there are a bunch of Orthodox churches and the Serbian Kingdom and the Russian and Bulgarian but Sveta Gora has a special status in Greece, there is no power there either for Rus, Serbia or Bulgaria.
          Just a thesis and topic for meditation?
          UN od 45g. just non-functional, it turned into an instrument of global power in the Anglo-Saxon world, and big business, honestly violated the foundations of international law. That is why the world today is on the verge of cataclysm, but a simple blind force represents international law, who has a bigger fist.
          The Holocaust over the Yebrians is no excuse for such behavior! And in World War 2, the great Holocaust itself was over the Slavs and then the Orthodox Slavs. The ratio of the killed Orthodox Slavs and Yevreis (I will not quote), or somewhere 75% to 25%, it means that for every 3 Orthodox Slovenes, 1 Jew is killed, if the Slovene is taken into account by the Catholic and Protestants, then for every 4-5 Slovenes there is 1 Jew!
          And today these Kotor killed the people of the Slavs and the Yevreis and Tsigan give themselves for the right to determine what the right is what is crooked in international society?
          Stray the world, and the AX is a new God, let us all be gone as the new God will divide the TRUTH?
          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 4 August 2020 14: 53 New
            0
            Quote: Wolf
            And today these Kotor killed the people of the Slavs and the Yevreis and Tsigan give themselves for the right to determine what the right is what is crooked in international society?

            I agree with you. Great comment.
          2. A. Privalov
            A. Privalov 4 August 2020 16: 45 New
            +1
            Dear Wolf, after the end of the First World War and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire (which ruled the BV for the last 600 years), Britain and France earlier - in the 20s, 30s and 40s already cut a bunch of Arab states here - Transjordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, etc. Yes, these are all "remakes". (There are no "ancient" states on the BV, perhaps excluding Egypt, but it also has its own historical problems.) And only from the little that remained from this redistribution, the UN decision was made to cut off another piece and give it to the Arabs to create another one Arab state. The remainder was offered to Jews.

            I am here on VO, probably for the 1947th time I am writing that in XNUMX the UN issued a ticket to the History Train to Arabs and Jews. The Jews accepted him with gratitude, and the Arabs began to dog and, right on the day of the proclamation of Independence, they attacked the newborn Jewish state in a crowd. And not at all in order to defend the rights of the "Palestinians" (Jews were then called Palestinians!), But in order to pilfer the lands that, in their opinion, were left unattended. But it was not there. They got hard on the horns and crawled away to lick their wounds.

            Now, about the UN. From the moment of its creation until the beginning of the 90s, the USSR voted there immediately three hands: actually the USSR, Ukraine and Belarus, which had their own representatives there. Add to this the hands of all socialist countries (Bulgaria, Poland, Czechoslovakia, etc.), the hands of the kindly Arab countries of "socialist orientation", the lured countries of Africa and Latin America, plus Cuba. Such an alignment made it possible to carry out any resolutions they needed. If the resolution that the earth is flat was put to the vote, and it was the Zionists who flattened it, then such a resolution would have passed by a majority of votes. Today the situation has changed. The Russian Federation finds itself in the UN much more difficult, and UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 is an example of this.

            As for the Holocaust, I have seen such figures and calculations more than once. If you do this out of ignorance, then take an interest in historical events. The 1935 Nuremberg racial laws and their tightening at the Wannsee Conference in 1942 were the ways and means of "the final solution of the Jewish question" - the program of genocide of the Jewish population of Europe, and not the destruction of the Slavs.
            If you do it maliciously, then know that the topic of Holocaust denial, the revision of the atrocities of Nazism, as well as the whitewashing of the Nazis, are closed once and for all and are no longer subject to discussion. hi
            1. A. Privalov
              A. Privalov 4 August 2020 17: 02 New
              +1
              I will only add that in 1948 half of Jerusalem remained in the hands of the Jordanians. Access to all Christian and Jewish shrines was closed for almost 20 years. Monasteries and synagogues were destroyed and plundered, a city dump was created at the Wailing Wall, the ancient cemetery on the Mount of Olives was almost completely destroyed. After the Six Day War, when the Jordanians were expelled, Israel fully opened up free access to the holy places of all faiths. Russians in thousands visit the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, the place of the baptism of Jesus Christ on the Jordan River, the Holy Trinity Cathedral, the Russian Spiritual Mission, etc.
              Back in 1959, the UN gave up control of Jerusalem and there will no longer be a return to “special status”.
              1. Wolf
                Wolf 4 August 2020 22: 59 New
                0
                We will answer then there is no time now.
            2. Wolf
              Wolf 4 August 2020 22: 57 New
              0
              We will answer then there is no time now.
            3. Wolf
              Wolf 5 August 2020 12: 39 New
              -1
              Let's start with it.
              Your quote:
              The First World War and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire (which ruled the BV for the last 600 years), Britain and France earlier - in the 20s, 30s and 40s already cut a bunch of Arab states here - Transjordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, etc. Yes, these are all "remakes". (there are no "ancient" states on the BV

              I completely agree.
              Then :
              And only from the little that remained from this redistribution, the UN decision was proposed to cut off another piece and transfer it to the Arabs to create another Arab state. The remainder was offered to Jews.

              Did they define the border between the English and the Franks and then draw them or not?

              Now:
              The Nuremberg racial laws of 1935 and their tightening at the Wannsee Conference in 1942 were the ways and means of the "final solution of the Jewish question" - a program of genocide of the Jewish population of Europe, not the destruction of the Slavs.


              I know the racial laws of Nazi Germany and I do well. I do not understand, I said that this was not and that the Jews were not destroyed in the most terrible ways?
              But all of you are silent about the FINAL DECISION OF THE SLAVIC VAPOROS, Hitler's Germany! How did Hitler solve the Slavic question from the Second World War? In addition to what destined the fate of the slaves by the Slavs? So, for example, 30% of the population of Belarus has decreased, etc. Hitler intended the loss of all the Yevreis, and there are not all Slavs, but they will remain slaves. If you take into account the number of Slavs in Europe, you can understand the size of the slavs over the Slavs.
              And now you want to say that the evil over the Yevrei is more terrible than the evil over the Slavs ???
              Zlochin est zlochin, does not define it any laws or declarations, but the deeds of evil, and the deeds of evil of the Nazis in the Second World War were over the Slavs and over the Yevrei and over the Tsiganov!
              In fact, the Nazis killed all 3 people in full and in the end. Lageri!
              Where have you seen EVIL FOR ME I HOLOCAUST DENY ???

              I denied somewhere evil against the Yevrei?
              1. A. Privalov
                A. Privalov 5 August 2020 16: 20 New
                +1
                What's wrong with the borders?

                I have never seen the expression "final solution of the Slavic question" anywhere in serious sources.
                Have you heard about "Kristallnacht" when the Nazis hunted Slavs in a big city?
                Have you met the Slavic ghettos?
                Did the deliberate actions of the fascists and their assistants from the local population lead to the destruction of 60% of the Slavic population of Europe or to the death of a third of all Slavs living in the world?
                And the point is not in absolute numbers. Jews are a small people, they were destroyed purposefully and systematically with German accuracy and pedantry. This is called genocide. This is his difference in the bloody massacre from 1933 until the end of the Second World War.
                6 million of his sons and daughters went to execution ditches, in the ovens of camp crematoria, died of hunger and hardship in the ghetto. Bless the memory of them. Amen ...
                1. Wolf
                  Wolf 5 August 2020 16: 23 New
                  +1
                  Amin!
                  Privalov and who is denying ???
                  1. A. Privalov
                    A. Privalov 5 August 2020 16: 25 New
                    -1
                    Quote: Wolf
                    Amin!
                    Privalov and who is denying ???

                    Конечно.
                    Who are the "Holocaust deniers"? Against whom in the Criminal Code of a number of countries is there criminal punishment?
                    1. Wolf
                      Wolf 5 August 2020 16: 27 New
                      +1
                      I don’t understand who you think?
                      1. A. Privalov
                        A. Privalov 5 August 2020 16: 31 New
                        +1
                        Who cares? Absolute evil is impersonal. The destruction of any people is evil. One evil is neither more nor less than another. This is a tragedy.
                  2. Wolf
                    Wolf 5 August 2020 16: 36 New
                    +1
                    As for the hunt for the Slavs, od the Nazis were one and a lot of them, the Nazis killed everything in a row and the children and the age of the ludi could be heard for Kragujevac, when they took the schoolchild and shot 3.000 in 1 day? There were many such examples in all Slavic countries. So the Nazis did not hunt for Yevreiam. The fact that you do not know it does not mean that it was not! And they systematically destroyed them pedantly!
                    1. Wolf
                      Wolf 5 August 2020 16: 41 New
                      +1
                      Themselves large Conc. The camps were occupied by the Slavic power of the Nazis. The atrocities of the Nazis were incomprehensible to the Luda mind.
          3. Vitaly gusin
            Vitaly gusin 4 August 2020 17: 12 New
            +1
            Quote: Wolf
            On what basis did the UN divide Palestine into an Arab and a Jewish state and on what basis did the UN give Jerusalem a special status?

            November 2 1917 of the year a document was issued by the Foreign Secretary of the British Empire Lord Arthur James Balfour (the text can be found on the Internet)
            You should know that at the time of the publication of the Balfour Declaration, the term "Palestine" referred only and exclusively to geographic region which includes the historical Land of Israel (in Hebrew "Eretz Yisrael"), and not to political education, since no independent or sovereign entity called "Palestine" has ever existed.
            July 24 1922 year by the decision of the League of Nations (the predecessor of the UN), it was adopted to create a mandate in Palestine / Eretz Yisrael. By this decision, adopted as an act of international law, the League entrusted British Empire responsibility for the implementation of the Balfour Declaration with a view to "creating a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine." The League of Nations mandate, now legally binding, recognized the "historical connection of the Jewish people" [/ b] to the region known in history as the Land of Israel, Judea and the Holy Land.
            In 1947, on the basis of the Balfour Declaration and the Mandate of the League of Nations, the UN General Assembly decided to divide the mandated territory into a Jewish and an Arab state. This decision was supported by 33 states that included the USSR.
            Israel has repeatedly reaffirmed its commitment to the principle "two states for two peoples", But the Arabs have proven many times that they strive NOT to the creation of their own state next to Israel, and instead of and in place of Israel
            THEY MAY WANT LONG LONGER.
            Quote: Wolf
            Rhetorically, the question is, if the UN proposed a special status for Yerusalem where the authorities were DIVIDED Palestine, Serbia, Russia, Bulgaria, Greece and Israel, would you consider it normal?
            Or in Sveta Gora in Greece, the same thing, there are a bunch of Orthodox churches and the Serbian Kingdom and the Russian and Bulgarian but Sveta Gora has a special status in Greece, there is no power there either for Rus, Serbia or Bulgaria.
            Just a thesis and topic for meditation?

            Ring in, I am not, like many here, an expert on everything that is happening in the world.
            I answered you about the official history of the formation of the State of Israel, documented and hidden from the Soviet people.
            1. Wolf
              Wolf 4 August 2020 23: 02 New
              0
              We will answer later.
            2. Wolf
              Wolf 5 August 2020 12: 56 New
              0
              So Respect Gusin,
              The UN cannot recognize 1 principle of resolving controversial issues in one case, and in the other they also deny the principle itself, no matter who agreed.
              There is no evil intentions here, but if there is no truth then the germ of war eats.
              Israel, as the power of the Israeli people, has all the rights of existence, like the rest of the power, and no one has the right to threaten destruction, but what would Israel have to have and internationally recognize the border, but they are not here?
              1. Vitaly gusin
                Vitaly gusin 5 August 2020 13: 45 New
                0
                Quote: Wolf
                The UN cannot recognize 1 principle of resolving controversial issues in one case, and in the other they also deny the principle itself, no matter who agreed.

                With this, you can contact the UN and explain to them what they can and what they can NOT.
                Quote: Wolf
                but Israel, so that the state should have and internationally recognize the border, but they are not here

                BY WHOM?
                Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas? You can convey greetings to them from the State of Israel, which supports these countries, having its embassies in Israel:
                Albania Angola Argentina Australia Austria Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Canada Chile China Colombia Republic of the Congo Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Finland France Georgia
                Germany Ghana Greece Vatican Honduras Hungary India Ireland Italy Japan Jordan
                Kazakhstan Kenya Republic of Korea Latvia Liberia Lithuania North Macedonia Malta Mexico Moldavia Myanmar Nepal Netherlands Nigeria Norway Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Rwanda Serbia Slovakia Slovenia South Africa
                South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sweden Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom Uruguay Uzbekistan Vietnam Zambi
                If you are a citizen of one of these countries, contact your government with a claim and I cannot help you.
                And next time THINK what write!
                1. Wolf
                  Wolf 5 August 2020 13: 55 New
                  +1
                  And I said that Israel is not recognized by the UN and the powers ??? Do you really not understand what I am writing or do you intend to do this? I wrote for sure What would Israel be a power should have a BORDER, but they are not here !!!
                  Without borders Israel will open on both sides the expansion and the decrease, and everything will be correct and according to the law if you do not violate other people's borders. But most importantly, other powers can legally expand their borders at the expense of Israel because Israel has no borders. And this is just an invitation to war.
                  1. Vitaly gusin
                    Vitaly gusin 5 August 2020 14: 21 New
                    0
                    Quote: Wolf
                    You really don't understand what I am writing

                    You are right.
                    It is somewhat difficult to read and understand what is written. But your train of thought is clear.
                    Quote: Wolf
                    Israel was supposed to have a BORDER, but they are not here

                    And where did you read it?
                    This is the theory of Iran, there is no state of Israel, so there are no borders, but there is a Zionist entity. Do not see yourself for propaganda!
                    The Israeli-Jordanian Peace Treaty was signed on October 26, 1994. Contract solved territorial and border issuesthat have continued since the war.
                    The armistice agreement between Israel and Egypt was ratified on February 24, 1949. Armistice line between these countries is an international border
                    The armistice agreement between Lebanon and Israel was signed on March 23, 1949. Highlights:
                    Leah of truce (ie "green line") is an international border, which corresponds to the 1923 border between the French Mandate in Lebanon and the British Mandate in Palestine.
                    During the 1990s, there were ongoing negotiations between Israel and Syria on mediation in the conflict and the withdrawal of Israeli troops from the Golan Heights, but peace negotiations were not successful. The main stumbling block is the 25 km² of territory in the Jordan Valley, west of the international Israeli-Syrian border, but which was captured from Syria in 1948 during the Arab-Israeli war, and remained under the armistice agreement of 1949 for Israel. Arab countries backed Syria's position in the formula that calls on Israel "Back to 1967 borders" those. leave the Golan Heights.
                    And Japan dreams of the Kuril Islands, both CAN DREAM
                    1. Wolf
                      Wolf 5 August 2020 14: 28 New
                      +1
                      Yes, but it remains to formalize it in the UN, as the USSR did with the Kuriles, then everything will be different.
                      1. Vitaly gusin
                        Vitaly gusin 5 August 2020 15: 09 New
                        0
                        Quote: Wolf
                        Yes, but it remains to formalize this in the UN,

                        But you wrote
                        UN cannot recognize 1 principle resolving disputable questions in one case, and in the other, the principle itself is also denied , it doesn't matter who agreed.
                        RELAX, ISRAEL WAS, IS AND WILL BE!
                        Go about your business, you have plenty of them.
                      2. Wolf
                        Wolf 5 August 2020 15: 58 New
                        +1
                        No comment. This is what you wrote is not a question of thought and logic and laws, but something that I do not understand. Who threatened Israel to write this line? , who said that he was not there? Who Said Israel Is Not? Who Said Israel Will Not Be? Am I in a miracle, or do you see something that I do not see, or someone added something to my comment, what is it for you, and less not? Calm down it's bad for your health.
                        And Heindrich (one of the creators of the solution of the Jewish question) departed Czechoslovakia, more precisely 1 Czech and 1 Slovak in Prague.
                        Neither the Americans, nor the British, nor the Franks, nor the Yevreya killed him.
                        Why do you think that all of you are enemies, even the SLAVES?
                        You country.
                      3. Vitaly gusin
                        Vitaly gusin 5 August 2020 16: 07 New
                        0
                        Quote: Wolf
                        No comments
                      4. Wolf
                        Wolf 5 August 2020 16: 08 New
                        +1
                        And the fact that we have a lot of problems, but eats them and there are a lot of them and there are no problems have created a GENERAL HARMFUL NATO, AND THE CRIMINALTS ON THE PEOPLE OF THESE POWERS BEGINNING ODE CLINTON PA THROUGH SHIRAK, THE QUEEN AND THE TACHERK IN ENGLAND GENSCHERA, ITALIAN. There are a lot of them, but this problem can be solved, just like 1945! wink
  8. zlinn
    zlinn 4 August 2020 08: 18 New
    +3
    can you find out? why should Jerusalem in general or could it be the capital of an Arab state?
    why didn't you become her in 1948?
    1. A. Privalov
      A. Privalov 4 August 2020 08: 32 New
      +4
      Quote: zlinn
      can you find out? why should Jerusalem in general or could it be the capital of an Arab state?
      why didn't you become her in 1948?

      Should not and could not.
      a) in the absence of UN status
      b) in the absence of an Arab state as such.
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 4 August 2020 09: 37 New
      -2
      Quote: zlinn
      why didn't you become her in 1948?

      The massacre would have been more brutal then.
      1. Zeev zeev
        Zeev zeev 4 August 2020 12: 53 New
        +1
        Half of Jerusalem, including the vast majority of the holy places, was under Arab rule from 1948 to 1967. They did not create any "Plasticine" there, and Jerusalem did not become the capital of the Arabs. Moreover, even electricity was supplied to East Jerusalem only in the 1960s (I don’t remember exactly, in 1965 or 1966).
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 4 August 2020 14: 59 New
          -1
          Quote: ZeevZeev
          Half of Jerusalem, including the vast majority of the holy sites, was under Arab rule from 1948 to 1967. They did not create any "Plasticine" there

          For Jerusalem, it is better that it is now under Israel. I have been several times, and the order is appropriate there, and people of different confessions can freely visit holy places. But the city is one thing, the capital is another.
  9. Zeev zeev
    Zeev zeev 4 August 2020 08: 25 New
    0
    Which state?
  10. A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 4 August 2020 08: 53 New
    +1
    Quote: Thrifty
    Zeevzeev -Jerusalem is the capital of the Palestinian state, which your land was not allowed to create, by occupying and annexing, that is, simply by squeezing someone else's land! And you can rewrite history as much as you like, you have no equal in the world!

  • tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 4 August 2020 08: 26 New
    -3
    Quote: ZeevZeev
    Maybe I missed something, but what does it have to do with it? Jerusalem is not the capital of one of the Arab states, Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.

    Well, having made Jerusalem the capital, you got Arab terrorists, but not the state of Syria as such, and this is now for life. Jerusalem, as the shrine of world religions, should be under the control of the UN.
    1. Zeev zeev
      Zeev zeev 4 August 2020 09: 31 New
      +3
      Jerusalem became the capital of Israel in 1949. Arab terrorists by that time had already attacked Jews for about 20 years. Learn materiel.
      1. kind
        kind 4 August 2020 11: 21 New
        -2
        They attacked badly. So we got a pain in the ass.
        1. Zeev zeev
          Zeev zeev 4 August 2020 12: 53 New
          +3
          It was not they who attacked badly, it was ours who fought back well
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 4 August 2020 15: 14 New
        -2
        Quote: ZeevZeev
        Jerusalem became the capital of Israel in 1949. Arab terrorists by that time had already attacked Jews for about 20 years. Learn materiel.

        I read the manual, but it sounds a little different. In the early to mid-1947th century, Jerusalem was the capital of Palestine, which was under British influence. In 1949, the UN passed a resolution on the division of Palestine. The Jews liked this idea, but the Arabs did not really like it, and a year later the Arab-Israeli war broke out. In April 1967, Israel and Transjordan signed a ceasefire, but the Jordanians did not fulfill its terms. In 1980, during the Six Day War, Israel drove Jordanian troops out of eastern Jerusalem. In XNUMX, the Israeli Knesset declared Jerusalem as the single and indivisible capital of Israel by new law in response to Arab attempts to claim the Holy Land. The Arab-Israeli conflict has not yet been resolved.
        1. Zeev zeev
          Zeev zeev 4 August 2020 16: 55 New
          +1
          You are very bad at reading the manual wassat
          In 1917-18, the territory of the Ottoman Empire was captured by the British and French. In 1922, two mandate territories were created on the former lands of the Ottoman Empire - Palestine under British rule (the text of the mandate says that (quote) "the mandate is given to create a JEWISH NATIONAL FOCUS", and Syria under French rule. The French mandate was divided into Lebanon and Syria (the administration remained French), and the British mandated territory was divided into a Jewish Palestine and a puppet, but Arab, Kingdom of Transjordan.In 1948 Israel proclaimed independence and Tel Aviv was declared the TEMPORARY capital (Jerusalem was in an Arab blockade and the functioning of the government was impossible During the Israeli War of Independence of 1947-49, Transjordan captured East Jerusalem (including the Jewish quarter of the Old City, from where all Jews under the age of 15 and over 60 years old were expelled, and all conditionally combat-ready men and women were captured and deported to a camp near Amman), but already in March 1949 and (before the signing of the armistice) Jerusalem was declared the official capital of the State of Israel (although Jordanians were sitting in the eastern part of the city, who in 1950 annexed all of Judea and Samaria along with East Jerusalem). And when in 1967 the Jordanians began shelling and air attacks on Israel (including the Jewish part of Jerusalem), military units were urgently transferred to the capital from Sinai, which they recaptured East Jerusalem from the Jordanians. In 1980 (in response to attempts by Israeli leftists to give the eastern quarters to the rule of the Arabs), a law on Jerusalem was passed, according to which a parliamentary majority of 61 votes was required to partition the city.
          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 4 August 2020 17: 48 New
            +1
            Quote: ZeevZeev
            In 1980 (in response to attempts by Israeli leftists to give the eastern quarters to Arab rule), a law on Jerusalem was passed, according to which a parliamentary majority of 61 votes was required to divide the city.

            Israel occupied East Jerusalem following the 1967 Six Day War. However, the UN does not recognize Israeli sovereignty over this territory. For me, let Jerusalem be the capital of Israel rather than the Palestinian state.
            1. Zeev zeev
              Zeev zeev 4 August 2020 19: 46 New
              -1
              You can occupy someone who owns it by law.
              1. tihonmarine
                tihonmarine 4 August 2020 20: 40 New
                0
                Quote: ZeevZeev
                You can occupy someone who owns it by law.

                It's hard to say, this was before the birth of Christ.
                1. Zeev zeev
                  Zeev zeev 6 August 2020 08: 47 New
                  -1
                  And before, and after, and during. From the point of view of the laws of God, from the point of view of international laws, even from the point of view of the laws of logic, Jerusalem can be either Jewish or deserted.
                  1. tihonmarine
                    tihonmarine 6 August 2020 09: 29 New
                    0
                    Quote: ZeevZeev
                    even from the point of view of the laws of logic, Jerusalem can be either Jewish or deserted.

                    However, you are evil dear, why deserted. Let it be and remain Jewish, there is more order.
  • 1536
    1536 4 August 2020 07: 13 New
    0
    Then one of them remembered what they had done with pirates in the past.
  • A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 4 August 2020 07: 15 New
    -4
    The IDF press service said that IDF military fighters and helicopters attacked targets of the Syrian army in the south of the country in response to the sabotage committed the night before on the Syrian-Israeli border.

    The targets of the Air Force attack were observation posts, military intelligence facilities, anti-aircraft guns, command posts of the Syrian army.


    The IDF press service stated that official Damascus is responsible for any hostile actions from Syrian territory.
    1. Thrifty
      Thrifty 4 August 2020 07: 25 New
      -2
      Privalov - "the strong is always to blame" - according to this commandment your Israel acts!
      1. A. Privalov
        A. Privalov 4 August 2020 07: 51 New
        -1
        Quote: Thrifty
        Privalov - "the strong is always to blame" - according to this commandment your Israel acts!
        "Hit on the right - substitute the left" - not ours.
        "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" - this is the commandment according to which Israel acts. hi
        1. Alt 22
          Alt 22 4 August 2020 09: 38 New
          -2
          Just imagine that you are the head of the housing office, I was attacked by a criminal hooligan from the next doorway of your house, which you yourself hate, and I went up to you in response and hit you in the face, knocked out the windows in your apartment and said that "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth," and that "your ZhEK is responsible for any hostile actions from the territory under your jurisdiction" - and you will begin to treat Israel's actions in a completely different way.
          1. A. Privalov
            A. Privalov 4 August 2020 10: 09 New
            +2
            Quote: Alt22
            Just imagine that you are the head of the housing office, I was attacked by a criminal hooligan

            But further primitivizing, I would declare a criminal and a person who took an antihelminthic drug, thereby violating the inalienable right to life of all things, and the doctor who prescribed this drug, an accomplice of the killer.
            1. Alt 22
              Alt 22 8 August 2020 18: 42 New
              -1
              Demagogy. You can declare anything you want, but you have no rights to impose treatment.
              And, "the defender of all that exists" - start first with the meat-packing plants - which in fact are the United States, well, Israel itself, an occupying country, an aggressor country.
        2. Vladimir_6
          Vladimir_6 4 August 2020 11: 56 New
          -1
          Quote: A. Privalov
          "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" - this is the commandment according to which Israel acts.

          You have trampled on this commandment long ago. For a missile blown up in the air, "Israel's military aircraft chose the plant as the main target in the Palestinian territory."
          For the groups of unknown people killed in Syria, "Syrian military intelligence facilities, Syrian army command posts, as well as anti-aircraft missile systems and other anti-aircraft installations" were attacked. This is already a jaw for a tooth and a head for an eye.
          1. A. Privalov
            A. Privalov 4 August 2020 12: 05 New
            +2
            Quote: Vladimir_6
            Quote: A. Privalov
            "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" - this is the commandment according to which Israel acts.

            You have trampled on this commandment long ago. For a missile blown up in the air, "Israel's military aircraft chose the plant as the main target in the Palestinian territory."
            For the groups of unknown people killed in Syria, "Syrian military intelligence facilities, Syrian army command posts, as well as anti-aircraft missile systems and other anti-aircraft installations" were attacked. This is already a jaw for a tooth and a head for an eye.

            Understand. It's hard for you to accept.
            You heard what is said: an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. But I tell you: do not resist evil. But whoever hits you on your right cheek, turn to him another

            - Matthew 5: 38-39
            Christian commentators, for example, St. John Chrysostom, drew attention to the fact that the seeming cruelty of the Old Testament commandment is actually love of mankind.
            The legislator prescribed - an eye for an eye, not so that we would tear out each other's eyes, but to keep our hands from insults; after all, the threat, which makes one fear punishment, curbs the desire for criminal deeds.

            - John Chrysostom, St. Conversations on the Gospel of Matthew, XVIII.1
            =======================================

            How to explain to a person who, sticking to you and beating himself with a heel in the chest, is trying to prove the "disproportionate" Israeli retaliatory strikes on missile
            shelling by terrorists.

            1. During the discussion, ask your opponent if he agrees with Israel's response to rocket attacks from terrorists?
            2. When he answers “no”, ask “Why?”
            3. Wait until he starts talking nonsense, something like: "This will lead to even more violence and casualties from civilians ... which is terrible ...".
            4. In the middle of the next sentence, give him a good nose.
            5. When he tries to answer you, stop him and explain that this is contrary to his views on the world, and will lead to more violence.
            6. Wait until the opponent agrees and promises not to respond to your attacks.
            7. Give your opponent a kick in the ear.
            8. Repeat paragraphs five through seven until he reconsiders his point of view on the matter.

            (The Young Zionist Handbook. 75th edition revised and enlarged. Jerusalem 2020.)
            lol
            1. Vladimir_6
              Vladimir_6 4 August 2020 13: 39 New
              -1
              Quote: A. Privalov
              Understand. It's hard for you to accept.

              Not at all. Of course, I am an Orthodox Christian, but I have not learned the commandment "do not resist the evil".
              I have the "USSR Mountaineer" badge on my avatar, but it was a sport for the soul. And for the body, I devoted many years to martial arts, and in my younger years I had to participate in fights not only on the tatami, but also in the "environment". Therefore, I used a different call: "Hit first, Fredy."
              I fully approve of your commandment "tooth for tooth" and "eye for eye". But the actions of the Israeli army go beyond this commandment and are more suited to the concepts of Article 114 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - exceeding the limits of necessary defense.
              An excerpt from The Young Zionist's Handbook is certainly funny, but utopian.
              The commandment "do not resist evil" is followed only by the Christian Baptist brotherhood. But they have neither homeland nor flag.
              And Orthodox Russia is the kingdom about which the prophet Daniel said:
              And in the days of those kingdoms, the God of heaven will raise up a kingdom that will never be destroyed, and this kingdom will not be transferred to another people; it will crush and destroy all kingdoms, and itself will stand forever
              hi
              1. A. Privalov
                A. Privalov 4 August 2020 14: 38 New
                +3
                Pragmatic opponents who understand humor cannot but rejoice ...
                So, the articles of the Criminal Code of a separate state and the military doctrine of another state, which was developed many years ago and has proven its worth, are completely different things. One of her points sounds something like this (I quote from memory):
                "The reaction to hostile actions against Israel must be instant, inevitable and asymmetric in order to discourage the enemy from repeating the aggression for a long time. Otherwise, the lack of reaction is regarded by the enemy as weakness, which leads to attempts to further escalate the conflict."
                On my own behalf, I will only note that during my 30 years of living in the Promised Land, more than once, in my own skin, I was convinced of the correctness of this maxim. Moreover, if in response to aggression in the form of rocket attacks, the Jews only threw stones in response, they would also be accused of exceeding the size of the defense. Because even Jews throw stones better than their enemies. Have you heard of David and Goliath? That is great. hi
                1. Vladimir_6
                  Vladimir_6 4 August 2020 21: 37 New
                  -1
                  Quote: A. Privalov
                  Pragmatic opponents who understand humor cannot but rejoice ...

                  Thank you for your kind words hi
                  Pragmatic and humorous opponents from the Promised Land also cannot but rejoice. good
                  "The reaction to hostile actions against Israel must be instant, inevitable and asymmetric in order to discourage the enemy from repeating the aggression for a long time. Otherwise, the lack of reaction is regarded by the enemy as weakness, which leads to attempts to further escalate the conflict."

                  I have no complaints about the doctrine. But it no longer rests on the commandment you mentioned, with which our dialogue began.
                  Many of the Russian members of the forum expected the implementation of such a doctrine after the tragedy with the IL-18. But alas, this is probably not our method.
                  Have you heard of David and Goliath?

                  I am not personally familiar, but during 20 years of studying the Bible I read it many times.
                  1. A. Privalov
                    A. Privalov 5 August 2020 05: 02 New
                    0
                    Military doctrines and commandments are quite distant from each other and meet each other much less often than we would like, alas ... hi
                    1. Vladimir_6
                      Vladimir_6 5 August 2020 12: 36 New
                      0
                      Quote: A. Privalov
                      Military doctrines and commandments are quite distant from each other and meet each other much less often than we would like, alas ... hi

                      Quite right. Moreover, the commandment - do not kill does not fit into the military doctrine at all.
                      "PS" Unfortunately, all articles concerning Israel have only two topics
                      1. Israel attacked the Gaza Strip ...
                      2. Israel attacked Syria ..
                      As if you have no achievements in science, medicine, agriculture, etc.
                      Therefore, the discussion of articles is of the same type, causing mutual hostility. Alas....
                      You have experience in publishing articles, try to work hard in this field. hi
                      1. A. Privalov
                        A. Privalov 5 August 2020 13: 02 New
                        0
                        Quote: Vladimir_6
                        Unfortunately, all articles concerning Israel have only two topics.
                        1. Israel attacked the Gaza Strip ...
                        2. Israel attacked Syria ..

                        Sorry this is editorials... Claims are not for me.
                        I have publishing experience. There are more than forty of my articles on the site. Some of them are quite amusing. If you had read at least some of them, perhaps I would not have been doing an educational program here.
                        hi
                      2. Vladimir_6
                        Vladimir_6 5 August 2020 18: 00 New
                        0
                        Quote: A. Privalov
                        Sorry, these are editorials. Claims are not for me.

                        These are not claims, but regrets. And not at all to you, but to the editorial board.
                        I have publishing experience.

                        I reviewed your profile.
                        If you had read at least some of them, perhaps I would not have been doing an educational program here.

                        I have read your articles, but I go through the educational program not on your articles and posts, but on the video materials of Igor Nikolaevich Panarin. https://www.youtube.com/c/MPolitika/videos
                        The history of the emergence and development of the Russian state, as well as the analysis of current events, is much closer and more interesting to me than the nuances of events on the topics "Second Lebanese War", "Six Day War", "Sinai Campaign", "Doomsday", etc.
                        hi
                      3. A. Privalov
                        A. Privalov 6 August 2020 11: 34 New
                        -2
                        Well, Mr. Panarin and I sometimes look.

                        True, after a number of his funny projects with the European king, fantasies and cheerful chatter about the collapse of the United States, I began to treat him as a common popularizer, a kind of lecturer of the Knowledge Society. It was like that in the second half of the last century. By the way, he often mentions Israel in his lectures. To the place and out of place, with many factual errors, which clearly reduces the level of presentation of materials. However, in fairness, it should be noted that he is a much more sane person than a number of Russian lecturers and gurus. hi
            2. Alt 22
              Alt 22 8 August 2020 21: 05 New
              -1
              Well, how are you Jews threatened by Syria? No way. And there is no need to present yourself as poor and offended, telling tales that Syria attacked you, when Syrian terrorists, protected by YOUR ALLIES by the Americans, provoke you to open fire in response. And in response, you, as a rule, shoot NOT at those who opened the fire - but at the Syrian army, which in general did not fire a single shot in your direction!
              And you cynically justify your actions with nonsense, "The Syrian government is responsible for everything in Syria."
              Although it is clear to anyone that you, Jews, are acting NOWALLY with terrorists against whom you are allegedly fighting. You simply use them as an excuse to ATTACK SYRIA FIRST, and it is clear that they are shooting in your direction, at your command - or perhaps the Americans, these are already details.
  • Rakovor
    Rakovor 4 August 2020 07: 17 New
    +1
    I don’t understand at all that everyone here was so excited. The countries are in a state of war, so they can rightfully hammer each other. And if Syria does not have such opportunities, then these are its problems. Let then make peace, but as I understand it, it is Syria that does not want this.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • A. Privalov
    A. Privalov 4 August 2020 07: 22 New
    -3
    The reaction to hostile actions against Israel must be instant, inevitable and asymmetrical in order to discourage the enemy from repeating the aggression for a long time. Otherwise, the lack of reaction is regarded by the enemy as weakness, which leads to attempts to further escalate the conflict.
  • Livonetc
    Livonetc 4 August 2020 07: 22 New
    0
    The infrastructure suffered serious damage and there were no casualties.
    Command posts and anti-aircraft complexes in the plural are named as targets for strikes in two provinces.
    In the absence of casualties, they were probably mock-ups or simply left unattended.
    Tell me, what task did the helicopters perform in delivering missile strikes?
    Or did they themselves launch missile strikes on the border area?
  • Vitaly gusin
    Vitaly gusin 4 August 2020 07: 24 New
    +1
    Dear author!
    In the article that you want to publish, try to state FACTS, and leave your comments and thoughts as all users and then you will look more professional.
    By the same logic, if an Arab terrorist attacks the police in one of the Israeli cities, then it is necessary to "bomb Jerusalem immediately"? ..  
    Our mind is boiling indignant. And when he boils, he does not analyze the actions of his master. That means when an Arab terrorist rushes at the police in one of the cities, and this may be Washington, London, Paris, Moscow, they need to be bombed. Or does this only refer to Jerusalem? And it doesn't matter that this is the center of three religions or when the mind is outraged, it does not understand it?
     Militants installed, and Israeli aircraft bombed the facilities of the Syrian government army. 
    For any aggressive actions from the territory of the state, the state from whose territory these actions were carried out is responsible. Israel took responsibility. 
    The information that another attack was carried out on objects in the capital region of the Syrian Arab Republic and the southern provinces is confirmed.  
    Israel confirmed the attack on the southern provinces, and the area, Damascus, as always, was attacked by the Air Force of Liechtenstein or Monaco. When there is evidence (and the statements of the Syrian news agency SANA are not so) then write about it.
    EG
    Today 4/08/20 unidentified aircraft attacked bases pro-Iranian militia in eastern Syria, about 15 killed.
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 4 August 2020 08: 12 New
      0
      Quote: Vitaly Gusin
      This means that when an Arab terrorist attacks the police in one of the cities, and this may be Washington, London, Paris, Moscow, they must be bombed.

      Well, while in Washington, homegrown terrorists, not Arabs, rush to the police and bring them to their knees.
      1. Vitaly gusin
        Vitaly gusin 4 August 2020 08: 24 New
        +2
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Well, while in Washington, homegrown terrorists

        Don't cling to the name of the city. Do I need to start listing all terrorist attacks in all cities of the world?
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 4 August 2020 09: 31 New
          0
          Quote: Vitaly Gusin
          Don't cling to the name of the city.

          So then it was not necessary to write the name of this city.
          1. Vitaly gusin
            Vitaly gusin 4 August 2020 13: 17 New
            0
            Quote: tihonmarine
            So then it was not necessary to write the name of this city.
            I'm not critical
            If this is so important to you, I don't mind, you can cross it out. But you somehow kept silent about the rest, should they be bombed too?
            1. tihonmarine
              tihonmarine 4 August 2020 15: 18 New
              0
              Quote: Vitaly Gusin
              But you somehow kept silent about the rest, should they be bombed too?

              Try to live peacefully without bombing.
              1. Vitaly gusin
                Vitaly gusin 4 August 2020 18: 45 New
                0
                Quote: tihonmarine
                Try to live peacefully without bombing.

                In 2000, Israel withdrew from the security zone in southern Lebanon in the hope of peace, but Hizbalah took this as weakness and in 2006 unleashed a war.
                In 2005, Israel unilaterally withdrew from the Gaza Strip and now the possibility of launching missiles has become even closer from this place.
                Many are outraged by the actions of Israel in Syria that do not allow Iran to arrange neither Lebanon nor Gaza there. BUT pay attention if at the beginning the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Government and the Ministry of Defense of Russia made statements on this matter, today they saw and understood the goals of Iran in Syria.
                1. tihonmarine
                  tihonmarine 4 August 2020 18: 52 New
                  0
                  Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                  In 2005, Israel unilaterally withdrew from the Gaza Strip and now the possibility of launching missiles has become even closer from this place.

                  What can I say, defend yourself as best you can, you are alone in BV, and few people will help you.
  • nobody111body
    nobody111body 4 August 2020 07: 36 New
    -10 qualifying.
    Israeli bandits on airplanes can bomb current schools and schoolchildren, and all the planes of these Jews can be shot down even by the outdated Soviet air defense; but apparently Assad (?) is afraid of these flying bandits or is afraid of Ayattol (?) and we can "our Vladimir" (?)
  • bar
    bar 4 August 2020 07: 46 New
    0
    the decision to launch missile strikes on Syria was made "in response to the sabotage that was committed the day before on the Syrian-Israeli border."

    Is that what they call the territories squeezed from Syria? Do they even have a "border"?
  • tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 4 August 2020 08: 08 New
    -5
    Turkey, Israel, terrorists, how they differ from each other. The methods are the same, but the names are different.
  • Conell f
    Conell f 4 August 2020 08: 10 New
    -1
    "Etiquette to nothing, if there is a gun !!!
  • Moskovit
    Moskovit 4 August 2020 08: 41 New
    -4
    Israel is only powerless to watch the strengthening of Iran in the region. In order to portray the activity in front of the voters, unhappy Syria is periodically hammered, which, of course, cannot give any answer. All these destroyed sheds, destroyed objects of the 70s cannot stop the expansion of Iran.
    1. bulava
      bulava 5 August 2020 13: 38 New
      0
      the main thing for us to benefit from this
  • Alt 22
    Alt 22 4 August 2020 09: 34 New
    -6
    Just fascists.
    1. Danila46
      Danila46 4 August 2020 09: 52 New
      +6
      you're right. Assad and Iran clearly want to end what the Third Reich began. only their Fauberge will never grow up to that ...
  • vetta
    vetta 4 August 2020 12: 36 New
    -8
    I would never have thought that Jews were such fascists. But the facts are there.
    1. andreykolesov123
      andreykolesov123 4 August 2020 13: 13 New
      +1
      I am a shield, you need to protest and write a letter to Putin.
      1. Vitaly gusin
        Vitaly gusin 4 August 2020 18: 55 New
        0
        Quote: andreykolesov123
        I am a shield, you need to protest and write a letter to Putin.

        If it doesn't help you
        Contact SPORT LOTO!
        1. andreykolesov123
          andreykolesov123 4 August 2020 20: 00 New
          +1
          Quote: Vitaly Gusin
          Quote: andreykolesov123
          I am a shield, you need to protest and write a letter to Putin.

          If it doesn't help you
          Contact SPORT LOTO!

          Can write a tluna in TOTO?
          1. Vitaly gusin
            Vitaly gusin 4 August 2020 20: 40 New
            0
            Quote: andreykolesov123
            Can write a tluna in TOTO?

            There they will not understand what they want to think of money.
    2. Danila46
      Danila46 4 August 2020 17: 47 New
      0
      mods! it is bad for you to think! the fact is obvious. talking nonsense ...
  • borberd
    borberd 4 August 2020 13: 03 New
    +5
    The Aftyr's logic is strange. Israel is fired upon from the territory of Syria, which controls the border with Israel, then, apparently, according to the broken "logic" of the author, the Syrian authorities are not to blame for this? And then who is the power in Syria? Or again - "Raufik is not to blame" (c)? The speech about Jerusalem is generally non-commentary nonsense. fool