Square sun of Leipzig and Nuremberg in Russia
So, we can say that the show continues. And after Ivan Golunov and Ivan Safronov went Nikolai Platoshkin. On approximately the same conditions and with the same degree of adequacy.
We will talk a little later about the similarities and possible development of the Platoshkin case in comparison with the cases of Ivan Golunov and Ivan Safronov, but for now, let's think about and figure out what Platoshkin was arrested for.
So, the head of the Department of International Relations and Diplomacy of the Moscow University for the Humanities and the leader of the movement "For New Socialism" Nikolai Platoshkin was arrested on June 4 this year. The Investigative Committee opened a criminal case on charges of inciting riots (part 1.1 of article 212 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and spreading fakes “about circumstances posing a threat to the life and safety of citizens” (207.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).
As usual today, without any details.
And the complaints of the wife of Platoshkin that the employees who "worked" in the apartment, in addition to office equipment, "seized" all the cash they could find, are not at all surprising. Apparently, this is a bonus so modern.
And while the RF IC is conducting "investigative actions" aimed at establishing the circumstances of the crimes committed, we will look at what was canceled as a result of these actions.
And first of all, the planned protests on June 6 were disrupted. Single pickets and authorized protests were planned across the country. As Platoshkin's associates stated, absolutely all the shares were declared in accordance with the current legislation.
In general, to accuse a person like Platoshkin of inciting riots is, to put it mildly, ridiculous.
One can take whatever one likes to the ideas preached by the theorist Platoshkin, but is there anything in them that can be considered a threat to the country?
Sorry, but the main idea of restoring the USSR on the basis of the referendum held 30 years ago is, of course, utopia. During these 30 years, we have all drifted so far that it is doubtful that it would be possible to bring everyone together. Is it really necessary?
Resource nationalization? Definitely yes. Resources should bring profit to all citizens of the country, and not to a bunch of oligarchs who have laid their hands on them.
Cancellation of the pension reform? Well, here, probably, if there are any disagreements with this, then only in the Kremlin, the state apparatus of the country and the Duma. The rest of the population is against.
Free higher education? Who, tell me, will be against the way it was during the Soviet era? Not pitiful handouts in the form of a certain number of budget-funded places in universities, but, on the contrary, paid education for the "especially gifted"?
To return "burnt out" bank deposits in the 90s? It is unlikely that any of the robbed in those days would be against.
So where is the threat to the country's security here? This is the threat to the security of the oligarchs and their servants. Especially those oligarchs that we do not have.
Platoshkin also has overkill. The accusation of criminal negligence on Putin and Mishustin is just one of such excesses. Yes, our all-Russian "fight" against the coronavirus, let's say, was somewhat chaotic, but most importantly, it was completely illogical in terms of the economy. And in some places it is even humiliating. But the main thing that was really worth blaming the Mishustin government for is the sheer ill-considered actions. Which have caused such damage to the economy that it will not soon be possible to assess correctly and clearly.
However, I return to what Platoshkin said. Where you can see fakes here is hard to say. And then, for fakes we are still fined, but not imprisoned. Except for fakes about the coronavirus, but here they don't even smell. Moreover, there is not even a fake or "knowingly false information" here, but his own opinion, which Platoshkin stated as he had the right to do so.
Imprisoning for the fact that Platoshkin demanded the resignation of Putin and Mishustin is the same overkill as charging him with calls for mass riots for the sake of the resignation of the aforementioned gentlemen. Exactly the same overkill as the demand for Putin's resignation due to his vague fight against the coronavirus. There are more serious complaints, to be honest.
Most likely, they decided to neutralize Platoshkin in this way, because he called for voting against the amendments to the Constitution. Together with his party "Alternative Russia" and the movement "For New Socialism".
That is, there is real political competition, which our current government ... does not really like.
That is why he is trying, on the one hand, to remove an objectionable politician from the political scene, and on the other, to do it more or less decently. In compliance with norms and protocols.
But the fact that Platoshkin is under house arrest, and not in a pre-trial detention center, just testifies to the fact that even the investigating authorities and the court are not very sure that it will be possible to prove the voiced composition of the "crime". Indeed, if desired, any court at any time would easily satisfy the motion to tighten the preventive measure.
And now is the time to remember two Ivanov, Golunov and Safronov. In the case of the first, the process is in full swing, and already confessions have poured into the light of day. Konovalov, a former employee of the drug control department of the Department of Internal Affairs of ZAO Moscow, admitted his guilt and turned in everyone else. A very logical act, taking into account the fact that among those who are with him on the case is the former boss of Konovalov, Lyakhovets, who gave the order to plant drugs on Golunov.
As a result, the rather obscene fabricated case fell apart. All that remains is the understanding that the true customers of the Golunov case remained in the shadows. And the employees of the drug control department, albeit up to their ears in the mud, are nothing more than pawns-executors.
There is reason to believe that approximately the same will happen with the Safronov case, who categorically refuses to admit the charges against him, calling them absurd. Time will tell, but most likely, the case will fall apart in about the same way as the Golunov case collapsed.
The whole problem of our bodies today is that there, in the bodies, there is a shortage of people capable of fabricating a more or less decent case. This is no secret at all, this is the reality of today. Alas. This is a problem that one cannot but rejoice in.
Hence, the attempt to put Platoshkin in prison also does not look serious. Against the background of the Far Eastern protests, against the background of a general attitude towards the very peculiar results of the vote on the vote of confidence in Putin, against the background of the arrests for violating the regime “do not understand what”, now the arrests of the participants of single pickets began.
The authorities simply do not understand how they should react to what is happening.
On the one hand, of course, I would like to see shouts of universal approval from all sides, on the other, what is being done for this?
In the case of Khabarovsk - the appointment, to put it mildly, not quite ready for this role, but seemingly loyal in all respects, Degtyarev, who first began to implement "plan number 1". That is, flooding the region with money.
Old and proven method in some regions.
But if it doesn't work ... Then “plan number 2” will be used, when all the dissatisfied will simply begin to be taken off the stage. Usually in handcuffs, since there would be a person, and an article or a package of drugs can always be picked up and planted.
And if the people begin to express their negative attitude, as in the Golunov case, then the people can be used with clubs. With ice water. They say it helps in terms of enlightenment and understanding that rallies are possible only when you need to express your "approval".
In general, the system is so-so. There are only two plans, and both do not evoke either respect or understanding of their effectiveness.
But back to Platoshkin. And now I strongly recommend listening to the phonogram (video filming in courts is now a rarity in our country, it’s impossible, all of a sudden too much will be on tape) of his speech in court. This is a very educational performance. The speech of a very intelligent person.
It's nice to listen to an intelligent person. And useful. Beautiful comparisons, beautiful turns.
Thank you so much for not blaming me for using nuclear weapons, is that I did not make a neutron bomb in the garage with a rasp and a file. When the investigator Abdurakhmanov, present here, who confiscated from my wife, unlawfully, in her absence, the last savings, conducted a search in my apartment, he had yet another thought. He says: "You have a lot of books in German." Well, what, espionage in favor of Germany. I was in Germany. I know German. He worked great there for his country, defended our monuments there.
By the way, I honestly admit that there are also books in Spanish, in English, in Czech. Imagine how much more scope for the investigation opens. After all, such countries as Antigua and Barbuda, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Grenada, Ghana speak English. Just imagine, I can work for all of them. Now, before your arrival, Abdurakhmanov threatened me that everyone who contacts me, in the presence of witnesses, will sit down for a long time. Is this an investigator? Further, I want, once again, to honestly admit, in addition to all this, that I tilted the Leaning Tower of Pisa. Just taking pictures, leaning, she bent over. But, as a mitigating circumstance, I would like to say that I tilted it towards the Russian Federation.
That is, the absurdity of these accusations that are being brought against me. Some kind of arson, what kind of weapon? He was looking for a weapon from me, in all seriousness. True, for some reason I did not find it. But you see, I am such a person, as if experienced, hid where I would not put it. So, Mr. Abdurakhmanov, about Germany ... Yes, back, my accusation reminds me, Leipzig is 33 years old, when the Nazis accused the Bulgarian communist Dimitrov of setting fire to the Reichstag. By the way, the case has not been investigated. And at the Reichstag, I have been repeatedly. I, I will tell you so, if this shameful, bestial, I stress once again, a far-fetched criminal case will not be immediately terminated, I will not be apologized, if it comes to court, you will end as well. I will blame you at the trial. For the fact that you are persecuting an absolutely innocent person who dared to say his point of view.
And more about Germany, since you are interested in it. Remember also the city of Nuremberg, just in case. Of course, when they sit in the dock under Article 299, and are responsible for initiating a case, on charges of an innocent person of committing a serious crime, he will say that his comrade colonel ordered him that he loves Nikolai Nikolaevich in general. And Comrade Colonel will claim that the General ordered him. Look at them, they are sure that you will not examine the evidence that this is all a formality, that he will sit, as he just told me, before your arrival, for a long time. I want everyone to hear and see this. This is the meaning of their consequence. Indeed, I was detained without a court order. Attention, the video they are sewing for me, April 15, my video, I shot it. I showed it during interrogation.
I am proud of every word that I said there. So, they studied it, allegedly for a month and a half, and then urgently, they decided to detain me on June 4, without a court order. What is the urgency? Did it make it, or what? Then why didn't they seize it, in fact? Well, since he is so all terrible, I do not know what is called there, although there are certainly no calls, a no brainer. When they arrested me, generally here on June 4, they also lied that they had the expertise of this video. As we understand, it is not there now. That is, I was detained on June 4 for a video for which there was not even an examination. It turns out that they can detain any person, in general, for any reason or what?
So, of course, they can do whatever they want now, unfortunately they are confident that you will make the decision they want. Here they will write that the sun is square. They are confident that the courts will confirm this. And this Platoshkin will sit. But it remains for you to mock innocent people not for years, not months, but weeks, and you will also be prosecuted for bringing an innocent person to commit what he did not do. And then, no matter what, it won't help you to avoid criminal liability.
And no matter how you judge me, the people will support and story will acquit me. I support the defense's motion to postpone the hearing, because they really got insolent to the point that the case materials refer to a document that is missing at all. By the way, I think that it is absent altogether, that is, not that they forgot to put it, well, that it does not exist at all. Well, what do you want if they now give us an examination order, do you know which one they presented to us? About Leningradsky Avenue instead of Leninsky. You can imagine what they are doing in general. It turns out that they intend to conduct a search on Leningradsky Prospect 93, which, probably, has something to do with me.
And what is only in Leningrad? By the way, it is also important that I support the petition and want to emphasize that I live on Moldagulova Street. Moldagulova was a sniper, which of course underlines my predisposition to violent actions. "
Yes, the accusations that Platoshkin addressed to the investigators are very, very serious. In principle, no one in Russia today will be surprised by the lawlessness that employees of various departments often demonstrate. This is, how to put it mildly, a symbol of the era.
If Putin himself admitted that sheer lawlessness was committed against Golunov, what to say ...
(V. V. Putin.)
Arbitrariness is becoming completely commonplace. Lies of the investigation, falsification of facts, all other attributes of "work" ...
Exactly the same arbitrariness, obviously, is happening in relation to Safronov and Platoshkin. We just do not know how otherwise in the organs. How many cases we don't know about? Or do we find out only after people die?
No, it is not in vain that Platoshkin draws analogies with Leipzig and Nuremberg. Indeed, those who today fabricate cases and manipulate facts or even allow themselves outright lies, they will then whine and moan about the fact that "they were following orders."
Eichmann, let me remind you, also said so. And he wondered how it happened ...
But you want to live in the country. In proud and free Where there is not only the right to vote from time to time to ensure that the state rulers live better and better. And give them that opportunity. And to really live more beautiful every year.
But it doesn't work out for some reason.
But it turns out that we all, according to Nikolai Nikolaevich, really live under a square sun. Because they are trying to prove it to us. And to prove that the evil spies from Georgia, who so outraged the Khabarovsk residents, are to blame for the popular demonstrations in the Far East. But not outright arbitrariness in relation to Governor Furgal. Chosen by the people, who went to the protests after being sent from Moscow to replace ... Degtyarev.
And I would like to live in a beautiful and strong country. No evidence. Just live. Knowing that tomorrow there will be no threat in your life from an investigator who writes with errors, who will threaten that he will jail you and all your relatives and friends. And a Russian Guard, wringing his hands with impunity. And the same police officer. And the judge, who, without going into details, will wave the decision about which he will be told.
But the latest practice suggests otherwise. Too many (and we do not know about all, do you agree?), Something has recently become such clearly strange things. Against those who disagree and who want to prove their disagreement.
Perhaps someone will say that everything written is also overkill. I agree, anything is possible. But it has been historically proven that Berlin and Nuremberg will definitely be behind Leipzig and Munich. Each in its own time, but must be.
And living under a square sun is not something that is inconvenient for the psyche, it is simply unrealistic. Although we are constantly trying to prove the opposite.
Information