Russia denied the statements of the PNC on the creation of a military base in Libya

21
Russia denied the statements of the PNC on the creation of a military base in Libya

Russia will not create a military base on the territory of Libya, Moscow does not have such plans, the corresponding requests were not sent to the Libyan authorities. This was stated by the Russian ambassador to Egypt Georgy Borisenko.

Answering questions from Egyptian journalists, the Russian ambassador explained that accusations from the Government of National Accord that Russia intends to create its own military base in Libya are groundless.



Russia has no such plans. No requests from the Russian side to the Libyan authorities about the creation of any military base, sea basing point were made

- said Borisenko.

Thus, he commented on the statement of the Minister of Internal Affairs of the Government of National Accord of Libya (PNC) Fathi Bashag to Bloomberg, in which he said that Russia intends to "create military bases in Sirte and Jufra" and the need to "prevent this."

At the same time, according to the statements made earlier by the same Bashagi, the PNS "would not mind" the construction of an American military base on the territory of Libya "to contain Russia." The PNS also welcomes the creation of military bases by Turkey. In June, Turkish media reported that the Turkish military was preparing to create two military bases on Libyan territory.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    21 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. 0
      30 July 2020 08: 23
      Russia denied the statements of the PNC on the creation of a military base in Libya
      Again information noise! angry
      1. +3
        30 July 2020 08: 29
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Russia denied the statements of the PNC on the creation of a military base in Libya
        Again information noise! angry

        Yes , because if something similar to "Russian base" and exists, it is clear that this temporary phenomenon, for a certain period until the settlement of the conflict and stabilization in Libya ...

        And then, you can see if the Russian base is needed there, or not feel
    2. +1
      30 July 2020 08: 32
      No requests from the Russian side to the Libyan authorities about the creation of any military base, sea basing point were made

      A strange statement, if Russia decides to create a base there, then the PNS will hardly be asked for permission, because their legitimacy is a bit questionable. Unless, of course, the ambassador understands the PNS as authorities, and he can hardly call the LNA authorities, he is still an ambassador.
      1. 0
        30 July 2020 09: 57
        The Americans published a photo from Il76 and cargo and in Libya ... so they declare
        1. 0
          30 July 2020 10: 20
          And the photo shows that these are Il'y belonging to the Russian Federation? After all, they are also exploited by Iran, China, Syria, the DPRK, Ukraine and ... the Emirates, Haftar's sponsor. And in the photo is the cargo that only the Russian Federation could deliver?
          1. +1
            30 July 2020 10: 27
            They wrote that the Russian Federation and Wagner's cargo. The liberal media is still raging. In general, I think that their bases in the region should be published in detail in the press. They will be less clever.
    3. +1
      30 July 2020 08: 42
      In the photo, a soldier in a "forest" camouflage against the background of yellow sand and brown mountains is on guard duty ... Comrades, military logisticians, have completely forgotten the lessons of Afghanistan and the basics of camouflage ..
    4. -3
      30 July 2020 08: 46
      It is already clear that the country will be divided into west and east. We are at the mercy of the bickering there, we don't have to go there.
      1. +2
        30 July 2020 09: 08
        Quote: unhappy
        We are at the mercy of the bickering there, we don't have to go there.

        laughing fool
        Also say that overthrowing Gaddafi and destabilizing Libya were in Russia's interests ...
        1. 0
          30 July 2020 09: 13
          Quite the opposite. This is a consequence of NATO's "democratization". Blatantly for everyone with whom you do not need to be friends. What does this lead to. Now it is a competitor country.
          1. +1
            30 July 2020 09: 20
            Quote: unhappy
            Now it is a competitor country.

            Who, shattered Libya belay ? Who is the competitor to whom?
            I, "competing firms"I see only in the face of several BW states (including Israel), Turkey, some EU members, the United States and Russia ...

            Which of these participants in "sabantui" do you mean?
            1. 0
              30 July 2020 09: 26
              Oil, one way or another, oil supplies from Libya in an armed confrontation, the more war will be hampered. This is good (yes I am a cynic).
              Money is given to Haftar by the coalition of Saudis, barmaley for money will be found and Turkey is also happy.
              1. +1
                30 July 2020 09: 31
                Quote: unhappy
                Oil, one way or another, oil supplies from Libya in an armed confrontation, the more war will be hampered. This is good (yes I am a cynic).

                For the overall impact on the global oil market now, these are crumbs.

                Leading economies have long been guided by the oil market and can feel great without Libyan oil. Moreover, against the background of a decrease in its consumption for a number of reasons.
                1. 0
                  30 July 2020 09: 42
                  Do you think the people are shooting at each other and the "neighbors" are just climbing out of compassion and humanity?
                  Oil is a resource (this is for the money drawn), today oil is 20 ye, in a year 100 ye.
                  Is everyone in the world going to drive electric cars? Spit in the face of such a speaker.
    5. +14
      30 July 2020 08: 51
      There is some contradiction in Bashagi's statements. Russia is absent in Libya, and at the same time
      The PNS "would not mind" the construction of an American military base in Libya "to contain Russia."
    6. 0
      30 July 2020 08: 53
      Well, YET, really not ... because first you need to recreate Libya as an integral state (now scattered uncontrolled territories with no concept of a center of power) and what will then need to be seen ... maybe the time will come about Libya at the next round of development ... who knows ...
    7. +1
      30 July 2020 08: 54
      Russia denied the statements of the PNC on the creation of a military base in Libya

      Russia will not create a military base on the territory of Libya, Moscow does not have such plans, the corresponding requests were not sent to the Libyan authorities.

      And then the name of the famous blockbuster comes to mind:
      "NEVER SAY NEVER"
      lol
    8. 0
      30 July 2020 09: 27
      "... the statement of the Minister of Internal Affairs of the Government of National Accord of Libya (PNC) Fathi Bashag to Bloomberg, in which he said that Russia intends to" create military bases in Sirte and Jufra "and the need to" prevent this. "

      At the same time, according to earlier statements made by the same Bashagi, the PNS "would not mind" the construction of an American military base on the territory of Libya "to contain Russia."

      So these clowns from PNS have finally thrown off their masks.
    9. bar
      0
      30 July 2020 10: 27
      The PNS "would not mind" the construction of an American military base in Libya "to contain Russia."

      Let Haftar win first, and then let his lips roll out.
    10. 0
      30 July 2020 11: 03
      that Russia intends to "create military bases in Sirte and Jufra" and the need to "prevent this."
      A request for a possible increase in aid from Russia's "big friends". If Russia is "creating", then naturally it is necessary to prevent this, but this requires forces and means. When you want to achieve "pants support", then you must definitely remember about Russia, and even better complain about its aggressiveness. Proven by Ukrainians, Poles, Balts, and unfortunately it works.
    11. +14
      30 July 2020 22: 59
      Fear has big eyes.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"