Military Review

Ukraine modernized the Shturm-S self-propelled anti-tank missile system

58
Ukraine modernized the Shturm-S self-propelled anti-tank missile system

In Ukraine, the next modernization of the 9P149 combat vehicle of the Soviet self-propelled anti-tank missile system 9K114 "Shturm-S" has been carried out. The prototype was shown during a visit by the new Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister - Minister for Strategic Industries of Ukraine Oleg Urusky to the state enterprise Kiev Design Bureau "Luch".


As reported, a prototype of the 9P149 combat vehicle of the 9K114 Shturm-S self-propelled anti-tank missile system was created by specialists from the Luch Design Bureau. According to available information, testing of a prototype of the modernized complex is planned to begin in the near future.

According to the developers of the upgraded complex, the Shturm-S combat vehicle is equipped instead of the standard 9M114 ATGM with the RK-2V Barrier-V guided missiles developed at the Luch Design Bureau with a laser beam guidance system. The declared firing range of Ukrainian missiles is 6 kilometers. Another change is the use of a round-the-clock optoelectronic OPSN-I system developed by the Izium Instrument-Making Plant for target detection and missile guidance. The ball of the OPSN-I system is installed in the front of the vehicle and in the stowed position is closed by an armored flap, which leans back before firing.


The OPSN-I product, as stated, provides a target detection range of up to 14,5 kilometers, and from 6 kilometers it allows you to accurately identify the target. With a high probability, we can say that this product is still intended for aviation, but not for land vehicles.

Also, on the modernized version of the Shturm-S complex, laser radiation indicators and a system for setting up an aerosol curtain are installed.

58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. APASUS
    APASUS 28 July 2020 14: 44 New
    +5
    The OPSN-I product is expensive and requires serious knowledge, and even a moment:
    A modern sight for military equipment was developed in the Kharkov region. The universal optical sighting station was created by specialists from the Izyum Instrument-Making Plant. Small in size, can be mounted on helicopters and drones. The device has laser guidance, which provides ultra-precise hitting the target. Serial production can start in 2020.

    The optical sighting station (OPSN-I) was developed by the State Enterprise "Izium Instrument-Making Plant", which is part of the State Corporation "Ukroboronprom", the first and only one in Ukraine of this class.

    Or it may not start ..................
    1. vkl.47
      vkl.47 28 July 2020 14: 58 New
      +2
      This is a copy of the "chrysanthemum" only the optics resembles a helicopter.
      1. Lexus
        Lexus 28 July 2020 15: 21 New
        -1
        This is a copy of the "chrysanthemum" only the optics resembles a helicopter.

        So is Urusky, as unlicensed, just the eyes are darker, a copy of our Borisov. winked

        1. venik
          venik 28 July 2020 20: 53 New
          -1
          Quote: lexus
          So is Urusky, as unlicensed, just the eyes are darker, a copy of our Borisov. winked

          ======
          Pancake! Still did not understand - and in the photo, then WHO of them? request
          "Urusky" is HOW to understand - "U- (Ukrainian) Russian ???? belay
          1. Lexus
            Lexus 28 July 2020 21: 38 New
            +2
            The prototype was shown during a visit by the new Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister - Minister for Strategic Industries of Ukraine Oleg Urusky state enterprise Kiev design bureau "Luch".
      2. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 28 July 2020 15: 53 New
        -3
        How not to "modernize" - all the same .... it turns out .... Ho hlyandiya, damn it ......
        1. Annihilator
          Annihilator 28 July 2020 16: 38 New
          -1
          But what about "decommunization"? They refuse Russian holidays, they don't want weapons? One word -..... (deleted by the moderator).
          1. Zoldat_A
            Zoldat_A 28 July 2020 16: 43 New
            -2
            Quote: Annihilator
            One word -..... (deleted by the moderator).

            That's just THIS and remains (what is deleted by the moderator) .....
        2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Lopatov
        Lopatov 28 July 2020 18: 26 New
        +3
        Quote: vkl.47
        This is a copy of "chrysanthemum"

        No.
        "Chrysanthemum" is a beast of a completely different level.
        1. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 28 July 2020 21: 11 New
          0
          We have such systems of our own ... so we must compare with them.
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 28 July 2020 21: 43 New
            +1
            "Shturm-SM", "Shturm-SME"

            The first for their own. Apparently, with the expectation of using the old 114 missiles, only radio control.

            The second is for foreign customers. In addition to the radio, it is possible to install equipment for a laser-beam.
            1. Maz
              Maz 28 July 2020 22: 22 New
              0
              two years ago "Chrysanthemum VM" is still a secret. 10 km
        2. venik
          venik 28 July 2020 21: 51 New
          0
          Quote: Spade
          No.
          "Chrysanthemum" is a beast of a completely different level.

          =====
          It is rather a "modernized" 9M114 complex "Attack" / "Shturm".
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 29 July 2020 08: 53 New
            +2
            Quote: venik
            It is rather a "modernized" 9M114 complex "Attack" / "Shturm".

            Come on, a completely different car.
            It is rather a kind of development of the MT-12R "Ruta" with its radar sight
      4. uav80
        uav80 29 July 2020 08: 09 New
        0
        OPSN-I is also helicopter optics and they use UAVs ...

        "Shturm-S" and "Chrysanthemum" are completely different machines. More precisely "Chrysanthemum" is a further development of "Sturm". The difference is that the "Chrysanthemum" has both a radar and an OPS, the caliber is 152, not 130, and it can shoot with a "doublet" at two targets simultaneously ...
        Yes, there are also different chassis "Shturm" on a motorcycle, "Chrysanthemum" on the basis of BMP-3.
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 29 July 2020 08: 50 New
          +2
          Quote: uav80
          More precisely "Chrysanthemum" is a further development of "Sturm".

          No, this is a completely different machine, with radar target detection and automatic guidance of the missile by radio beam.

          Well, optics with laser-beam missile control is a backup option. Among other things, it allows you to fire at two targets at the same time.

          Initially, thermal imagers were not even installed on them, it was believed that the radar was enough for the eyes. But then they decided to slightly optimize the SPTRK for local wars, when the laser beam comes to the fore.
    2. Orange
      Orange bigg 28 July 2020 14: 58 New
      -3
      Cool, they have landed a universal optical-sighting station for helicopters and drones.
      "Kulibins" unfinished.
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 28 July 2020 18: 25 New
        +4
        Quote: OrangeBigg
        Cool, they have landed a universal optical-sighting station for helicopters and drones.

        But the minimum development costs.
        They still have nowhere to go, they obviously have no serviceable 114 missiles. They are not produced in Eastern Europe.
  2. Gloomy skeptic
    Gloomy skeptic 28 July 2020 14: 55 New
    -5
    And there is still no statistics on how many maintenance personnel suffered from the tests of this "masterpiece" of the Ukrainian defense industry? I will modestly keep silent about the operation.
    For example, about the mortar "Hammer" they say that it is very effective against their own calculations, much more than against the enemies of this "wunderwafele".
    1. Andrey the Magnificent
      Andrey the Magnificent 28 July 2020 16: 03 New
      -6
      "For example, about the Hammer mortar they say that it is very effective against their own calculations."
      I also remembered about the "Hammer", the calculation of two soih laid down !?
      1. Gloomy skeptic
        Gloomy skeptic 28 July 2020 16: 10 New
        -3
        More, during the tests, a couple of calculations were ruined completely up to the 200s, and in the ATO-OOS there were also not isolated cases, although the iris already knew the "capricious" nature of this instrument and hovered in the cracks, and therefore in all cases the calculations were not defeated by 100%. But about the defeat of the enemy with this "hammer", while rumors did not reach because the mine is also flying mysteriously and unpredictably, so it is not a fact that in the direction in which the mortar was aimed.
    2. venik
      venik 28 July 2020 21: 57 New
      0
      Quote: Gloomy Skeptic
      For example, about the mortar "Hammer" they say that it is very effective against their own calculations, much more than against the enemies of this "wunderwafele".

      ========
      Lord! Even an ordinary PIPE cannot "roll out" normally ..... And this - country, where ships (including aircraft carriers), aircraft, launch vehicles were once built ........ crying
    3. Gloomy skeptic
      Gloomy skeptic 29 July 2020 13: 06 New
      0
      They minus me - so the Ukrainians are massively jackals here ???
  3. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 28 July 2020 15: 03 New
    -1
    Riveting single copies does not mean to launch a series. Besides, what else will the tests show? It is clear that they need to modernize the legacy of Soviet technology, but the resources for this are as necessary as the technological base.
    1. Tavi
      Tavi 28 July 2020 16: 35 New
      -1
      yes, NATO will not praise ...
  4. Romanenko
    Romanenko 28 July 2020 15: 13 New
    -4
    A certain collective farm tank, with the world on a string - a naked shirt, is impressive
  5. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 28 July 2020 15: 21 New
    -1
    Here is one of 250 OCDs that were talked about in the morning and ended ... There are still 249 ...
  6. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 28 July 2020 15: 42 New
    0
    All the same, MTLB is a good thing, and I wish the Ukrainians that their OPSN-I remain in a single copy.
  7. Aaron Zawi
    Aaron Zawi 28 July 2020 15: 48 New
    +7
    In general, it looks quite serious.
    1. English tarantas
      English tarantas 29 July 2020 01: 55 New
      +1
      In general, an ordinary Assault, but this canoe from a helicopter is like a saddle on a cow, looks like a child of two Lego constructors blinded one thing.
  8. svp67
    svp67 28 July 2020 16: 00 New
    +2
    Strange, but Ukraine produced a very good sighting system for the "Chrysanthemum" ATGM system, what was the letter "X" marked with?
  9. agoran
    agoran 28 July 2020 16: 18 New
    -1
    I doubt very much that in the country of the descendants of the ancient Sumerians they can produce anything efficient.
    Designers from the times of the USSR are already retired, modern engineers have left for work either in the Russian Federation or in the EU.
    Example:
    - mortars of their own production kill their own.
    - undertook the repair of s-tov - not "shmogla".
    - took up the supply of armored personnel carriers - welded seams parted.
    For what the forelock will not undertake, it still turns out shit.
  10. lopvlad
    lopvlad 28 July 2020 16: 31 New
    -1
    Ukraine modernized


    after the "revolution of gidnosti" in Ukraine, if they undertake the modernization of military equipment, then it turns out a shahid-mobile, and if for the modernization of a weapon, it instantly turns into a weapon of a shahid.
  11. Zeev
    Zeev zeev 28 July 2020 16: 50 New
    +2
    An interesting idea, but it would be better to make the sighting system retractable on the bar so that you can shoot from cover. He pushed the guidance station out of the hillock (of course, painted in a normal color), identified the target, put a marker on it, and sniffed the missile without sticking out.
    1. MP
      MP 28 July 2020 17: 29 New
      0
      You shouldn't have given them such an idea
    2. Lopatov
      Lopatov 28 July 2020 18: 32 New
      +3
      Quote: ZeevZeev
      An interesting idea, but it would be better to make the sighting system retractable on the bar so that you can shoot from cover. He pushed the guidance station out of the hillock (of course, painted in a normal color), identified the target, put a marker on it, and sniffed the missile without sticking out.

      Too complicated.
      It is necessary to bring the missile to the line of sight immediately after the launch. Which will be located in space each time in a different way.
      And "difficult" means "unreliable"
      1. Zeev
        Zeev zeev 28 July 2020 20: 36 New
        -1
        What's so difficult? Guided aerial bombs and helicopter missiles have been in use since the 1970s.
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 28 July 2020 21: 40 New
          +1
          Quote: ZeevZeev
          Guided aerial bombs and helicopter missiles have been in use since the 1970s.

          This is completely different.
          This is not a target illumination for a semi-active laser seeker.
          This is laser beam control. The receiver is in the stern of the rocket. Tula residents call this "laser trail" in their advertising brochures for dummies.
          Analogue of "Cornet"
          1. Zeev
            Zeev zeev 28 July 2020 23: 15 New
            0
            I think that it is not so difficult to correct the movement of the rocket at the initial stage of the flight from the exit from the container to this "laser path".
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 29 July 2020 08: 40 New
              +1
              Quote: ZeevZeev
              I think that it is not so difficult to correct the movement of the rocket at the initial stage of the flight from the exit from the container to this "laser path".

              Nobody has done this yet.
              Moreover, even with a known position of the line of sight relative to the launcher, it is quite difficult, it is not for nothing that a wind sensor was installed on the "Shturm"
              1. Zeev
                Zeev zeev 29 July 2020 10: 32 New
                +1
                As far as I remember, the "Shturm" was originally a radio command guidance system. And writing three commands to bring the missile into the line of sight is hardly a problem.
                1. Lopatov
                  Lopatov 29 July 2020 10: 38 New
                  +1
                  Quote: ZeevZeev
                  the "Shturm" was originally a radio command guidance system.

                  Yes.
                  And while the PU and the optical coordinator are separated. Which requires a more complex launch of the missile into the line of sight. So much so that even a wind sensor was installed
    3. Thorvlobnor IV
      Thorvlobnor IV 28 July 2020 23: 41 New
      0
      For shooting from a forest belt along the field, which is a typical landscape for Ukraine, a barbell is optional. For a one-storey city building or a dug-in position - approx. But considering the enemy's reconnaissance drones, the position "in the bushes" is preferable to the "dug" one.
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 29 July 2020 08: 45 New
        +1
        Quote: Torvlobnor IV
        the position "in the bushes" is preferable to the "dug" one.

        Yeah ....
        laughing
        The rocket is more likely to collide with bushes when launched.
        See where the launcher is and where the aiming device is. The absence of anything in the field of view does not mean that there are no branches in front of the launcher and that they will not stumble upon it when launching the rocket.
        1. Zeev
          Zeev zeev 29 July 2020 10: 38 New
          +1
          Firstly, if the technique operates from an ambush, it will take half a minute to clear the branches. Secondly, what should be the branches so that they prevent the rocket from flying? The fuse will still not react to them, it is too early for cocking, the branch is unlikely to be able to destroy the rocket.
          1. Lopatov
            Lopatov 29 July 2020 10: 41 New
            +2
            Quote: ZeevZeev
            it will take half a minute to clear the branches

            Where?
            That is, aim, raise the launcher, get out of the car to visually see which branches to remove, and then clear the sector. Then start up.

            Quote: ZeevZeev
            what should be the branches so that they prevent the rocket from flying?

            Quite thin.
            The rocket clings to the plumage and begins to somersault.

            Quote: ZeevZeev
            The fuse will still not react to them, too early to cocking

            And the engine is running ...
            1. Zeev
              Zeev zeev 29 July 2020 16: 32 New
              +1
              With me, they managed to shoot through the bush (not very thick, though) with an RPG-7 grenade. The grenade flew further and successfully hit the target, the bush did not even catch fire.
        2. garri-lin
          garri-lin 29 July 2020 13: 05 New
          -1
          So swap PU and Sharik. At the same time, teach guidance / observation devices to see the rocket from the moment of launch and automatically bring it to the Trail. This is for the Ball on the mast.
  12. PalladaTomsk
    PalladaTomsk 28 July 2020 20: 38 New
    -1
    I wonder how the Ukrainian brothers made Urusky the minister if Russian is read in his surname)
    1. Ilya Nikitich
      Ilya Nikitich 29 July 2020 07: 20 New
      0
      Everything is possible there. Even Moskal was a minister there ...
  13. Prost Stas
    Prost Stas 29 July 2020 11: 40 New
    +1
    The modernization seems to use the RK-2P, and not the RK-2V, with a range of 7 km. And 6 km was a requirement of the Ministry of Defense for development (which Luch surpassed).