Military Review

Trump does not rule out the closure of Chinese diplomatic missions in the United States

88
Trump does not rule out the closure of Chinese diplomatic missions in the United States

The American authorities do not exclude that they may demand from China to close some other diplomatic institutions in the US after the Consulate General in Houston. This was stated by American President Donald Trump.


Speaking at a press conference, Trump told reporters that he does not rule out the closure of any more Chinese diplomatic missions in the United States, this issue is being considered.

Can we close more Chinese diplomatic missions? Of course, it is quite possible (...) You see what is happening. We believe that there was fire in the (consulate general - approx.) That we closed. Everyone said that. I believe they burned documents, papers. I wonder what that would mean

- he said.

Recall that earlier the United States demanded that China close the Consulate General in Houston, Texas within three days. As the official representative of the US State Department Morgan Ortagus said on this occasion, Washington ordered the closure of the PRC Consulate General in Houston in order to "ensure the protection of the intellectual property and personal information of Americans."

The decision made a negative reaction from the official Beijing, which demanded to cancel the closure of the diplomatic mission, threatening to retaliate if the United States fulfills its threat.

According to the American media, the most likely retaliatory step by China will be the closure of the American consulate in Wuhan, China.
88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mitroha
    Mitroha 23 July 2020 07: 11 New
    +4
    According to Lavrov ...
    "-When there are no reasonable arguments, you can probably do so ..." - any American president
    1. Insurgent
      Insurgent 23 July 2020 07: 22 New
      +9
      Trump does not rule out the closure of Chinese diplomatic missions in the United States.

      Are they going the beaten path, repeating the practice of closing Russian diplomatic missions?
      1. Shurik70
        Shurik70 23 July 2020 07: 30 New
        +2
        In one phrase
        1. NDR-791
          NDR-791 23 July 2020 07: 46 New
          0
          ... that China's most likely retaliatory move will be the closure of the American consulate in Wuhan, China.
          wassat China, as always, contrary to forecasts, will do it its own way. Everywhere consulates will close and transfer them to Wuhan, closer to the epicenter, so to speak. tongue
          1. Olezhek
            Olezhek 23 July 2020 08: 23 New
            +2
            China, as always, contrary to forecasts, will do it its own way. Everywhere consulates will close and transfer them to Wuhan, closer to the epicenter, so to speak


            And when and what did China do "contrary to forecasts"?
            In relations with the United States?
            1. orionvitt
              orionvitt 23 July 2020 13: 00 New
              +1
              Quote: Olezhek
              And when and what did China do "contrary to forecasts"?

              I do not know about the "forecasts", but the fact that China did everything, contrary to the recommendations of the IMF, is for sure. This allowed them, to a certain extent, to become a leading economic power.
          2. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 23 July 2020 08: 56 New
            0
            Quote: NDR-791
            Everywhere consulates will close and transfer them to Wuhan, closer to the epicenter, so to speak

            Laughter, but the states have already begun to attack Russian journalists, and not black panthers, but policemen, "defenders of freedom" and kneeling. There was an attack yesterday and two days ago too. So it is not just that the Chinese consulates are being closed.
            1. NDR-791
              NDR-791 23 July 2020 09: 13 New
              +1
              Unfortunately, it was not the police who attacked our journalists. If there were police officers, it would be possible to show them seriously. They have a paramilitary organization (albeit fully armed and equipped) that operates under the auspices of a committee created following the results of 11.09/XNUMX. These are the very ones who can do EVERYTHING and for this they will not get ANYTHING if they believe that there is a threat to their national security. And this is especially sad because this "guard" turns into an analogue of the Maidan banderlog. And on which side they will be before the elections is not yet clear.
            2. Rusticolus
              Rusticolus 23 July 2020 09: 56 New
              -1
              So it is necessary ... to recruit blacks, well, or Tajiks, some of them are quite good. Let them crawl on their knees to close.
        2. Olezhek
          Olezhek 23 July 2020 08: 28 New
          -32
          Well stupid ...


          Remind me who won two world wars? belay

          Obviously not Zadornov.
          And since when did cheap pshut become a political expert?
          1. Ka-52
            Ka-52 23 July 2020 08: 36 New
            12
            Remind me who won two world wars?

            Well, tell me WHO won two world wars. Did the Americans do it in your alternate universe?
            1. Olezhek
              Olezhek 23 July 2020 08: 39 New
              -16
              Well, tell me WHO won two world wars.


              The USA got PROFIT
              The biggest losses in the two world losses are Russia.

              Dumb ... yes, they are dumb.
              But they have their own margin.
              1. Ka-52
                Ka-52 23 July 2020 09: 04 New
                +9
                The USA got PROFIT
                The biggest losses in the two world losses are Russia.

                did you win wars or gain benefits? Something you quite briskly jump from one to another.
                1. Olezhek
                  Olezhek 23 July 2020 09: 44 New
                  -5
                  did you win wars or gain benefits? Something you jump quite briskly from one to another


                  Do not substitute for the victory in the war with profit in the war. This is blasphemy.


                  Don't you confuse politics with demagoguery
                  According to the results of the two worlds, the United States reshaped the planet for itself.
                  It's clear?
                  And does it stupidity?
                  1. Ka-52
                    Ka-52 23 July 2020 10: 06 New
                    +8
                    Don't you confuse politics with demagoguery

                    Well, if I have demagoguery, then you have a lie bordering on stupidity. Because victory in a war is the infliction of a catastrophic military defeat by one state on another, the overthrow of its military-political power and forcing it to surrender on its own terms.
                    The Americans in the NVD participated in the war as part of the ANTANTA coalition, and the brunt of the hostilities fell on France and Great Britain. During WWII, the Americans also participated in the war as part of the allied coalition, in which the USSR bore the brunt of the fighting. It was on the eastern front that Germany's main human and technical resources were ground to dust. You can certainly say about the defeat of the Japanese forces by the Americans in the Pacific islands. But even there, the victory of the Americans was only in the local theater of operations and 700 thousand without the defeat. It is not yet known how much the Americans would flounder with Japan during the Manchurian operation of the land Kwantung grouping.
                    The USA practically did not suffer losses during 1 and 2 MV (unlike France, Germany, Great Britain, Republic of Ingushetia / USSR) - insignificant human and no economic losses. What to wonder at their subsequent world status. Until the mid-50s, the USSR was still finishing liquidating the consequences of the war.
                    1. Olezhek
                      Olezhek 23 July 2020 10: 15 New
                      -12
                      Well, if I have demagoguery, then you have a lie bordering on stupidity.


                      And you, dear, have already finished two Sorbonnes?
                      First the Bolshoi. then Malaya?

                      Sometimes lies border on stupidity, sometimes on betrayal ... laughing
                      1. aszzz888
                        aszzz888 23 July 2020 11: 21 New
                        0
                        Olezhek Today, 10:15 AM NEW ... Sometimes lies border on stupidity, sometimes on treason ... laughing
                        Uuuuuuu, how everything is running! laughing
                2. Rusticolus
                  Rusticolus 23 July 2020 09: 59 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Ka-52
                  The USA got PROFIT
                  The biggest losses in the two world losses are Russia.

                  did you win wars or gain benefits? Something you quite briskly jump from one to another.

                  Apparently this is a Jew. You can see the sky through the dupa, but on the other hand, with fat, it means you won. laughing
                3. Alex Justice
                  Alex Justice 23 July 2020 19: 09 New
                  0
                  did you win wars or gain benefits?

                  And they won the war and got the benefit. Only the blind cannot see it.
            2. orionvitt
              orionvitt 23 July 2020 13: 10 New
              0
              Quote: Ka-52
              well tell WHO won two world wars

              Everything is correct here. I will not go for the first, but at the end of the Second World War, of course we won, but we won, yes, the Americans. Victory and winning (that is, they got all the "goodies") are somewhat different things, especially in economic terms. After the war, a third of the USSR lay in ruins, while the United States not only jumped off the "Great Depression", but also became so fat. And in general, in the opinion of many, the main result of the Second World War, from which it all began, is the Bretton Woods agreements. For such a profit, the Americans could unleash more than one world war. The main thing is to sit out overseas and come to the section of the pie in time.
              1. Ka-52
                Ka-52 24 July 2020 05: 07 New
                0
                Victory and winning (that is, they got all the "goodies") are somewhat different things, especially in economic terms.

                I’ll do a little bit of fun, but the concepts of "winning the war" and "winning the war" have the same meaning. But “to gain from participating in the war” is another thing. Just what you are talking about. It's like chess. It is one thing to win a chess tournament as a grandmaster, and another thing to profit from the sale of chessboards to the tournament participants as a manufacturer.
          2. Kurare
            Kurare 23 July 2020 09: 24 New
            0
            Quote: Olezhek
            Remind me who won two world wars?

            Do not substitute for the victory in the war with profit in the war. This is blasphemy.
            1. orionvitt
              orionvitt 23 July 2020 13: 13 New
              +2
              Quote: Kurare
              Do not substitute for the victory in the war with profit in the war. This is blasphemy.

              No one replaces Victory with anything. You are confusing Winning with winning. And the conversation was initially about winning, that is, who and what got the result, in terms of economic benefits.
              1. Kurare
                Kurare 23 July 2020 13: 58 New
                +1
                Quote: orionvitt
                No one replaces Victory with anything. You are confusing Winning with winning.

                No, I don't! At Olezhek it was written: who won two world wars?
                If it was: who won (won) from two world wars, you would be right.

                Those. either to express thoughts correctly, or it is blasphemy.
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 23 July 2020 08: 45 New
        +1
        Quote: Insurgent
        Are they going the beaten path, repeating the practice of closing Russian diplomatic missions?

        B happens on the same "checklist". Only the heading from above is not "Russia" but "China", Trump put the marks on the necessary points, signed and "Beetle face".
    2. halpat
      halpat 23 July 2020 09: 39 New
      +1
      What a politically incorrect mummer is in Trump's background!
      1. White.
      2. Dressed in the uniform of the times of the oppression of blacks.

      The Americans decided to overtake the Chinese, who, as it turned out, have ample choice to mirror the response to the closure of their consulate in the United States. Wuhan, Guangzhou and Hong Kong. It cannot even be called stupidity. Inadequacy is an appropriate term.
  2. Thrifty
    Thrifty 23 July 2020 07: 16 New
    +5
    Yeah, there in the USA there is a state within a state, the so-called Chinatown, so its liquidation is worse than the closure of some useless consulates, because Chinotown has its own "consulate and diplomats"! That's what Trump will not be able to cope with! For the Chinese triads will not look at how some Yankees prevent them from rebuilding the United States to suit their interests.
    1. Olezhek
      Olezhek 23 July 2020 08: 24 New
      -7
      Yeah, there in the USA there is a state within a state, the so-called Chinatown, so its liquidation is worse than the closure of some useless consulates, because Chinotown has its own "consulate and diplomats"! That's what Trump will not be able to cope with! For the Chinese triads


      Watch less TV
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 23 July 2020 08: 48 New
        +1
        Quote: Olezhek
        Watch less TV

        And what is wrong with them, with this "Chinatown", I'm not in the know.
      2. aszzz888
        aszzz888 23 July 2020 11: 20 New
        0
        Olezhek Today, 08:24 NEW Watch less TV
        well, nothing new with this audience. If there is no reason, they blame it on TV. Poor, poor TV! What has he got to do with it ?! laughing
        1. Olezhek
          Olezhek 23 July 2020 12: 42 New
          -2
          If there is no reason, they blame it on TV.


          Yeah, there in the USA there is a state within a state, the so-called Chinatown, so its liquidation is worse than the closure of some useless consulates, because Chinotown has its own "consulate and diplomats"! That's what Trump will not be able to cope with! For the Chinese triads


          laughing crying lol

          Chinese triads will kill Uncle Trump ... good
    2. Alex Justice
      Alex Justice 23 July 2020 19: 14 New
      0
      And we have Chinatown, a typical shopping area in the center.
      1. Olezhek
        Olezhek 23 July 2020 20: 24 New
        -2
        And we have Chinatown, a typical shopping area in the center.


        But in fact - a "secret center of power" ... bully
        Worse than Denver ...
  3. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 23 July 2020 07: 19 New
    -2
    Previously, this gesture could be a "bell".
    Now you need to closely monitor what Facebook will write ...
    1. Insurgent
      Insurgent 23 July 2020 07: 25 New
      +3
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Previously, this gesture could be a "bell".
      Now you need to closely monitor what Facebook will write ...

      It only seems that real politics (Real policy), through the efforts of some, say, not very far-sighted politicians (heads of states), moved to Facebook ...

      In reality, there are only its echoes, though not the most defining ...
  4. Ros 56
    Ros 56 23 July 2020 07: 21 New
    +1
    And it is not easier to break off diplomatic relations with the responses of the ambassadors. Just starting in the states, very interesting.
    1. Olezhek
      Olezhek 23 July 2020 08: 26 New
      -11
      And it is not easier to break off diplomatic relations with the responses of the ambassadors.


      Do not worry.
      The State Department will sort out diplomacy.
      But what is interesting is that the United States has clearly put the Chinese in their place.
      1. Ros 56
        Ros 56 23 July 2020 08: 30 New
        +3
        Let the striped ones worry, and the State Department in diplomacy is zero without a wand, due to its arrogance mixed with stupidity.
        Cowboy mentality with two convolutions and those straight.
        1. Olezhek
          Olezhek 23 July 2020 08: 31 New
          -7
          Let the striped ones worry, and the State Department in diplomacy is zero without a wand due to its arrogance


          Very convincing.
          Now google it: a map of American military bases.
          Be shocked.
          1. Ros 56
            Ros 56 23 July 2020 08: 43 New
            +3
            In the course, especially about their performance. Someone is already concerned about them, and at the same time about the decision-making centers on the American continent. The devil is not so terrible as he is painted, especially the American one with two straight convolutions.
          2. Tank hard
            Tank hard 23 July 2020 09: 23 New
            0
            Quote: Olezhek
            Now google it: a map of American military bases.
            Be shocked

            This is yes. How much money down the drain! good
            1. Olezhek
              Olezhek 23 July 2020 09: 42 New
              0
              This is yes. How much money down the drain!


              Do you know that the Japanese, for example, are also paid for it?
              Or a complete pattern break?

              Are you aware of the political and economic consequences of so many US bases on the planet?
              Are you aware that they do not suffer from excessive generosity and just do nothing?
          3. aszzz888
            aszzz888 23 July 2020 11: 18 New
            -2
            Olezhek Today, 08:31 AM NEW Now google: a map of American military bases.
            Be shocked.
            And who, besides the Chinese themselves, knows how many missiles they have, including you idle? bully Even among the northerners, the Merikatos cannot calculate, only approximately. wondering.
      2. Tank hard
        Tank hard 23 July 2020 09: 22 New
        0
        Quote: Olezhek
        But what is interesting is that the United States has clearly put the Chinese in their place.

        Well, what is "clarity"?
      3. aszzz888
        aszzz888 23 July 2020 11: 15 New
        +1
        Olezhek Today, 08:26 NEW ... But what is interesting - the United States has clearly put the Chinese in their place.
        I wonder where, when and what? request laughing
      4. Revolver
        Revolver 23 July 2020 19: 41 New
        0
        Quote: Olezhek
        The State Department will sort out diplomacy.
        As an American by passport, I dare to assure you that the State Department understands about international politics like pigs in citrus fruits.
        Quote: Olezhek
        The United States has clearly put the Chinese in their place
        And the fact that the Chinese were put in their place is, unfortunately, not quite yet, but this is a step in the right direction. Maybe in the second term, Trump will succeed, put the Chinese in place in the proper position. He is not Obama or Biden, and he puts the country's interests above political correctness. And by the way, the people in America rather support the idea of ​​putting the Chinese in place in the proper posture.
    2. Olezhek
      Olezhek 23 July 2020 17: 54 New
      -1
      And it is not easier to break off diplomatic relations with the responses of the ambassadors


      Let the striped ones worry, and the State Department in diplomacy is zero without a stick.


      Will you be from Ukraine?

  5. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 23 July 2020 07: 24 New
    +4
    Earlier it was "Casus Belli", and now elementary showdowns for the presidential seat in the United States ... wassat
  6. 7,62h54
    7,62h54 23 July 2020 07: 44 New
    +3
    As far as intellectual property is concerned, the Chinese have developed technologies with a margin. Now, of course, they will make adjustments to the budgets, but nothing, it's worth it.
  7. mikh-korsakov
    mikh-korsakov 23 July 2020 07: 49 New
    +7
    I don't understand the experts who roll their eyes and begin to explain to us why a catastrophe will happen if China presents its American bonds for sale. Most often they broadcast - a world catastrophe will happen - and that's all. Some explain to us that Russia will suffer because our main export commodity is oil and gas. My question is, what if the dollar collapses, then oil and gas are not needed by humanity. Obviously not. Oil exchanges will collapse, yes. But there are many opportunities to sell oil - at least for the national currency, at least for barter, as by the way gas is sold, the spot market there is weak. Yes, you will have to negotiate separately with each state or private company. Therefore, our speculators on the oil stock exchanges will go bankrupt - but they will be more than enough to survive until retirement. So why put the US in place of this disaster?
    1. Olezhek
      Olezhek 23 July 2020 08: 27 New
      -4
      I don't understand the experts who roll their eyes and begin to explain to us why a catastrophe will happen if China presents its American bonds for sale.


      Earlier (at the early stage of the conflict) China was afraid to do this, but now it is too late. ...
      1. Revolver
        Revolver 23 July 2020 20: 09 New
        +1
        Quote: Olezhek
        Earlier (at the early stage of the conflict) China was afraid to do this, but now it is too late. ...

        The Wuhan virus has affected the entire world, but China is perhaps the most. They stopped unloading ships with supplies from China in American ports, and probably in European ports too. And this means that China, if not now, then very soon will have to either stop all factories working for export, or urgently build warehouses for illiquid assets in the hope of someday selling the thread at least half the price. And this is the collapse of the economy.
        I found out from my own experience. My washing machine again (for the second time in the last 5 years) has covered bearings. We decided to buy a new one, especially since the stores offer huge discounts. It turned out that yes, you can buy, but delivery is good if in November, as the seller said, this is an optimistic estimate when imports from China will recover. And the bearings are on sale, so on Sunday I have to communicate with the washing machine in an unnatural way in a perverted form.
        America will not fall apart from the fact that it is impossible to buy new rags or electronics, people will somehow manage with what they have. But the Chinese economy will be sour.
    2. Svarog
      Svarog 23 July 2020 08: 38 New
      -1
      So why put the US in place of this disaster?

      The US is unlikely to just look at it. If they see that it is decided to destroy them economically, they will unleash a war. I think this is the reason. I also do not see any other reasons.
    3. APASUS
      APASUS 23 July 2020 08: 48 New
      +2
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      So why put the US in place of this disaster?

      Because it means a collapse of the system and a global crisis. China, with all its economic power, is not trying to kill the United States, but simply to replace it. Remember the history of the British pound and where is the "ruler of the seas" Great Britain now?
      1. Olezhek
        Olezhek 23 July 2020 10: 12 New
        -4
        Because this means a collapse of the system and a global crisis. China with all its economic power is not trying to kill the United States, but simply to replace


        China is fundamentally incapable of this.
        Purely politically and ideologically.
        Life is not about economics.
    4. Revolver
      Revolver 23 July 2020 19: 44 New
      0
      Quote: mikh-korsakov
      I don't understand the experts who roll their eyes and begin to explain to us why a catastrophe will happen if China presents its American bonds for sale.

      In this case, China will run into the formula "to whom I owe, I forgive." And China understands this.
  8. Tugarin
    Tugarin 23 July 2020 08: 04 New
    +7
    It is naive to expect that due to the closure of diplomatic missions, China will raise its paws. As tyril, so be it.
    1. Olezhek
      Olezhek 23 July 2020 08: 25 New
      -7
      It is naive to expect that due to the closure of diplomatic missions, China will raise its paws


      China is being "carefully" put in place. And it is right.
      1. Tugarin
        Tugarin 23 July 2020 08: 28 New
        +9
        No one is against punishing China for copying. But in this case, China will simply respond in a mirror image. And he can come up with something new with Hong Kong.
        1. Olezhek
          Olezhek 23 July 2020 08: 37 New
          -7
          No one is against punishing China for copying.


          Everything is much more serious comrad: Trump bulldozes China
          what "copying"?
          Trump (and those behind him) does not need China in any form.

          Frightened, China caved in and limited oil purchases in Venezuela and Iran, imposed sanctions against Russia for Crimea ... but this did not save him from reprisals
          At one time comrade. Stalin said on a similar occasion that it was impossible to come to an agreement with the bandits, they had to be beaten.

          China wanted to "negotiate" - this is the result. request
          1. Aleksandr21
            Aleksandr21 23 July 2020 16: 25 New
            0
            Quote: Olezhek
            Everything is much more serious comrad: Trump bulldozes China
            what "copying"?
            Trump (and those behind him) does not need China in any form.

            Frightened, China caved in and limited oil purchases in Venezuela and Iran, imposed sanctions against Russia for Crimea ... but this did not save him from reprisals
            At one time comrade. Stalin said on a similar occasion that it was impossible to come to an agreement with the bandits, they had to be beaten.

            China wanted to "negotiate" - this is the result.


            You greatly overestimate the capabilities of the United States, in 2000-2010, the Americans could seriously affect the whole world, and in 2020, pay attention to how the world has changed, many still do not realize this, but the consequences of the coronavirus hit the US economy very seriously, and accelerated the processes that already underway, the rise of China and the decline of the West. Moreover, the US economy in 2020 will fall much more than originally expected, and the Chinese economy has begun to recover and by the end of the year there will be about 2% growth (according to forecasts), investments in China, by the way, have increased and the outflow is also coming from the United States. Few now believe in the American economy ... therefore, all these Trump movements are a game for the public and for his rating on the eve of the US elections, but in fact he can do nothing with these processes, and China cannot be bulldozed.
            1. Olezhek
              Olezhek 23 July 2020 17: 51 New
              0
              You greatly overestimate the capabilities of the United States, in 2000-2010, the Americans could seriously influence the whole world, and in 2020, pay attention to how the world has changed,


              I would like to draw you: back in 2010, the Onolitegs were sure that China is an independent magnitude, and the United States does not order it.
              And in 2019, the United States ordered - and the brave Chinese quickly imposed banking sanctions on Russia "for Crimea."
              request

              Great and Mighty China turned out to be a pitiful dummy. crying
              1. Aleksandr21
                Aleksandr21 23 July 2020 18: 25 New
                0
                Quote: Olezhek
                Great and Mighty China turned out to be a pitiful dummy.


                Not really, the Chinese just have a different mindset, they made concessions in the trade war and signed a not very profitable contract, but nevertheless, China did not abandon the New Silk Road, a strategy by which they would oust the United States from their throne, and the Americans are very much concerned With this project, even in Israel, the Americans had to not easily convince their ally to refuse to let investments and companies from China. And about other countries (where the influence of the United States is less) and say nothing, there is an economic / trade war for domination in the world. Again, with Hong Kong, China went into aggravation, and they could have surrendered back because of the pressure from the United States, but did not surrender. And there are many such situations ... China acts out of interests - is it profitable or not, and bends its line, somewhere gently, sometimes even retreating, somewhere it rigidly defends its position.
                1. Olezhek
                  Olezhek 23 July 2020 19: 04 New
                  0
                  Not really, the Chinese just have a different mindset, they made concessions in the trade war and signed a not the most profitable contract, but nevertheless, China did not abandon the New Silk Road, a strategy by which they would oust the United States from their throne, and


                  And here it is not so simple ...

                  Russia is taking less and less part in the implementation of the Chinese project "One Belt, One Road", writes the American edition of Foreign Policy. As one of the most significant signals, the authors of the publication perceived the fact that Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov did not participate in a videoconference dedicated to this initiative, which took place in June.


                  https://www.gazeta.ru/business/2020/07/21/13161061.shtml
      2. mikh-korsakov
        mikh-korsakov 23 July 2020 08: 31 New
        +1
        The time has come neatly to put the USA in its place - they behave like a mad cucumber. And the fact that China has already raised the required number of specialists and is at the pinnacle of progress is a fact. They can borrow something from the Americans - but in little things. The G5 is Chinese, not American. In technology, China is power, the US sucks
        1. Olezhek
          Olezhek 23 July 2020 08: 33 New
          -8
          The time has come neatly to put the USA in its place - they behave like a mad cucumber.



          You and the flag in hand! lol

          And the fact that China has already raised the required number of specialists and is at the pinnacle of progress


          But China has not matured to an independent foreign policy.
          1. aszzz888
            aszzz888 23 July 2020 11: 11 New
            0
            Olezhek Today, 08:33 NEW
            -5 .... But China has not matured to an independent foreign policy
            Sometimes keeping quiet is better than blurting out the unintelligible. PS Yes, my fat minus is drawn.
            1. Olezhek
              Olezhek 23 July 2020 11: 22 New
              -2
              Sometimes keeping quiet is better than blurting out the unintelligible.


              I can not disagree with you

              PS Yes, my fat minus is drawn.


              Yes nivapros
  9. Graz
    Graz 23 July 2020 08: 16 New
    +1
    the Yankees are leading to a big war it was long understood
  10. To be or not to be
    To be or not to be 23 July 2020 08: 29 New
    +1
    Agony or closer to coma America?
  11. Olezhek
    Olezhek 23 July 2020 08: 30 New
    -8
    Speaking at a press conference, Trump told reporters that he does not rule out the closure of any more Chinese diplomatic missions in the United States, this issue is being considered.


    Clearly, firmly, concretely.
    1. Tank hard
      Tank hard 23 July 2020 10: 24 New
      +1
      Quote: Olezhek
      Clearly, firmly, concretely.

      Like always on Twitter? Trump is a famous "intellectual". laughing
  12. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 23 July 2020 09: 02 New
    -1
    China, too, does not rule out which diplomatic mission of the United States to give a magic kick. 6 in China and 1 in Hong Kong. And in general, let Old Man be called as consultants. they simply cannot, or they will simply have to keep silent.
  13. Kurare
    Kurare 23 July 2020 09: 21 New
    0
    You see what's going on.

    Nope, I don't see.
    We believe that there was fire in the (consulate general - approx.) That we closed.

    Yeah nuuuuu ?! belay A fire that did not threaten anyone in a building on the territory of a sovereign state? Was he in general or a highley like?
    Everyone said that.

    Well, since everyone said, then it must be true. fool
    I believe they burned documents, papers. I wonder what that would mean

    Interesting - ask. The brains must be turned on.

    And in general, someone just 4 years ago said that Obama was doing something wrong when he closed the Russian consulates in the United States. And what we see, what we see ...
  14. thinker
    thinker 23 July 2020 10: 02 New
    +1
    According to the American media, the most likely retaliatory step by China will be the closure of the American consulate in Wuhan, China.
    It's like in a fairy tale - "just don't throw me into the bush." The consulate in Wuhan was evacuated at the very beginning of the pandemic. Chinese media have a different opinion -
    U.S. Consulate in Chengdu opened in 1985 and is of strategic importance ...

    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3094336/us-consulate-chengdu-prime-target-china-retaliation-over
  15. rocket757
    rocket757 23 July 2020 10: 20 New
    0
    Another act of the "Marlezon ballet"!
    What's next? Ban China altogether?
    1. Olezhek
      Olezhek 23 July 2020 17: 56 New
      +1
      What's next? Ban China altogether?


      Before the Opium Wars, the largest economy on the planet ... was not Britain.
      China. recourse
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 23 July 2020 22: 07 New
        0
        China has been a lot in its long history.
        Now a new phenomenon of China as a great economy of the world, all of which will undoubtedly be followed by other acts of Chinese ballet !!!
  16. alma
    alma 23 July 2020 11: 07 New
    11
    The dive between the States and China will continue.
    1. Olezhek
      Olezhek 23 July 2020 11: 27 New
      -2
      The dive between the States and China will continue.


      And we need to take into account only our interests.
      Not American and not chinese.
      1. Olezhek
        Olezhek 23 July 2020 17: 46 New
        0
        (-2)
        And we need to take into account only our interests
        Not American and not chinese.


        It is good news that the interests of China are more important for members of the forum than the interests of Russia.
        Amazing result! drinks

        Or are the people drowning for America !?
  17. aszzz888
    aszzz888 23 July 2020 11: 09 New
    0
    The American authorities do not exclude that they may demand from China to close some other diplomatic institutions in the US after the Consulate General in Houston. This was stated by American President Donald Trump.
    What do the elections do with the Merikatos. And then the box opens a little! laughing
    1. Vestnik
      Vestnik 23 July 2020 18: 17 New
      -1
      Quote: aszzz888
      What do the elections do with the Merikatos. And then the box opens a little!

      The Merkos usually bombard someone hard before the elections .. Trump is the only president who has refrained from this so far, but now he’s going to do it along the way, but he still cannot choose a victim .. Russia is in the way!
      Quote: Olezhek
      It is good news that the majority of members of the forum consider the Crimea Ukrainian and support the sanctions against Russia. am

      Info war is in full swing here on the internet .. While the power of the language is on their side, but it's not over yet.
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 24 July 2020 08: 31 New
        0

        Quote: aszzz888
        What do the elections do with the Merikatos. And then the box opens a little!

        Merkos usually heavily bomb someone before elections .. Trump is the only president who has refrained from this so far, but now, along the way, will go for it, but just can't choose a victim yet .. Russia is in the way!
        But Syria was bombed all the same.
        1. Vestnik
          Vestnik 24 July 2020 16: 35 New
          -3
          Quote: aszzz888
          But Syria was bombed all the same.

          So yes, only a strange bombing was more than half of the lionfish in milk, and the rest hit insignificant objects ..
  18. Olezhek
    Olezhek 23 July 2020 11: 26 New
    -4
    (-6)
    China scared, he caved in and limited oil purchases in Venezuela and Iran, imposed sanctions against Russia for Crimea... but this did not save him from reprisal


    It is good news that the majority of members of the forum consider the Crimea Ukrainian and support the sanctions against Russia. am
    SUGS! wink

    Sala to the heroes!
  19. Vestnik
    Vestnik 23 July 2020 18: 13 New
    -1
    The United States has taken China seriously, wants to write off its debts .. Well, well.
    Let them butt, but Russia has more important things to do, the country needs to be revived!
    They offered China a military and economic alliance, everyone kept silent with a smile .. Well, they smiled before
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 24 July 2020 08: 33 New
      +1
      Vestnik Yesterday, 18:13 NEW
      -1
      The United States has taken China seriously, wants to write off its debts .. Well, well.
      Let them butt, but Russia has more important things to do, the country needs to be revived!
      They offered China a military and economic alliance, everyone kept silent with a smile .. Well, they smiled before
      So yes, the cut is still ahead of the campaign.