Military Review

The head of the USC named the construction time of the laid-down submarines of the Yasen-M project

96
The head of the USC named the construction time of the laid-down submarines of the Yasen-M project

The two multipurpose nuclear submarines Voronezh and Vladivostok, laid down at Sevmash on July 20 on the same day of laying the ships, will become part of the Russian Navy in 2027-2028. This was announced by the head of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) Alexei Rakhmanov.


According to the head of the USC, the construction of both submarines at Sevmash will take about 6,5 years, after which the submarines will be handed over to the customer.

We plan to build boats within 6,5 years, that is, the fleet will receive them at the turn of 2027-2028

- said Rakhmanov.

On July 20, 2020, at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk, the ceremony of laying down two submarines of the Yasen-M project, Voronezh and Vladivostok, took place. The contract for the construction of two Project 885M Yasen-M nuclear submarines was signed in the summer of 2019 during the Army-2019 International Military-Technical Forum. According to the general director of "Sevmash", the ships will receive a hypersonic weapon.

Currently, the Russian Navy has one Project 885 nuclear submarine "Severodvinsk" fleet in 2014. The lead submarine of the modernized project 885M "Kazan" should enter the fleet by the end of this year. In addition, there are five more submarines of project 885M at different stages of construction at Sevmash, one of them (Novosibirsk) was launched.

The Yasen-M submarines have a displacement of 13800 tons, a diving depth of 520 meters, a crew of 64 people, an autonomy of 100 days, and an underwater speed of 31 knots. In service are mines, torpedoes 533 mm, cruise missiles "Caliber" and "Onyx".
96 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. St Petrov
    St Petrov 21 July 2020 14: 58
    +5
    How does the opposition explain to itself the construction of new submarines? Aircraft? Helicopters? Ships?

    a red herring to sell the Motherland?
    a red herring to calm the patriots?

    dig into your head with some kind of digger stick. Maybe I would have realized your logic.
    Now a dissatisfied body will appear here, put a minus and begin to sprinkle ashes on its head and appeal to the class struggle


    1. Finches
      Finches 21 July 2020 15: 02
      +1
      Yes, you will not see anything interesting there, they have like in a joke about a blonde -

      The doctors decided to examine the blonde's brain. They opened the skull, and there completely
      empty, just some kind of rope stretched. Take a chance, cut the rope
      - the ears fell off.
      laughing

      They are State Department puppets - they don't need a brain at all!
      1. St Petrov
        St Petrov 21 July 2020 15: 04
        -4
        They are State Department puppets - they don't need a brain at all!


        the puppet will sit on allowance and run errands. But what about the local actors who do it for free?

        They are waging, so to speak, a battle with the Kremlin from a trench with the Baltic states and a twinned ukroariy. Vlasov waffle would have a platoon of our whining oppositionists. He would have worked on the material. Maybe even waffles would have gotten into battle outside of online



        1. Finches
          Finches 21 July 2020 15: 05
          -10 qualifying.
          Foolish and just sick people!
          1. St Petrov
            St Petrov 21 July 2020 15: 08
            -2
            Foolish and just sick people!

            I have no other opposition for you (c)
            1. cniza
              cniza 21 July 2020 15: 27
              -2
              Quote: c-Petrov

              Now a dissatisfied body will appear here, put a minus and begin to sprinkle ashes on its head and appeal to the class struggle


              We have already run, though everything is anonymous, they really do not like it when Russia does something not to please their owner ...
              1. St Petrov
                St Petrov 21 July 2020 15: 29
                -13 qualifying.
                Have already run

                in sad and nullified offenders and viina is just as sad)
                Well, nothing, they will be patient. This tribe - mastered the skill of patience - excellent
                1. AUL
                  AUL 21 July 2020 15: 52
                  +8
                  Quote: s-t Petrov
                  Well, nothing, they will be patient. This tribe - mastered the skill of patience - excellent

                  False start, guys! All return to the starting position. No one has yet had time to say anything, and the klaker brigade has already begun to "severely denounce and angrily stigmatize" the agents of the State Department, the Banderaites and the offended! Looks like the nerves let down. It happens... laughing
                  1. St Petrov
                    St Petrov 21 July 2020 15: 55
                    -10 qualifying.
                    Nobody had time to say anything yet

                    here. one is. At least one not silently put a minus sign in his bell. So he has something to say.
                    Do I know the answer to my question?

                    How does the opposition explain to itself the construction of new submarines? Aircraft? Helicopters? Ships?

                    How does such news coexist with the logic of your sad battle?

                    1. Krasnoyarsk
                      Krasnoyarsk 21 July 2020 19: 50
                      +6
                      Quote: s-t Petrov
                      ... At least one not silently put a minus sign in his bell. ...

                      In your attempt to demonstrate knowledge of the Ukrainian language, you look like (prohibited by the site rules). Do not disgrace yourself.
                2. snake
                  snake 21 July 2020 19: 35
                  -1
                  Quote: s-t Petrov
                  in sad and nullified offenders

                  Anyone like, but at the word "zeroed" I associate with our beloved president.
        2. sevryuk
          sevryuk 21 July 2020 17: 25
          -6
          "Maybe even waffles would have gotten into the battle outside of online"
          - fight!
    2. Courier
      Courier 21 July 2020 15: 28
      -15 qualifying.
      The USSR built aircraft carriers and orbital stations, it did not help him in any way.
      1. St Petrov
        St Petrov 21 July 2020 15: 30
        -7
        so the guys from the Soviet Communist Party sold the USSR. Nothing will help here. The effectiveness of these managers will be the envy of any tops of our time.

        They mastered the skill for several decades (first, they dragged nails from factories with a glance, then chairs with a proudly raised gaze, then machines). We finished it in 5 years.

        1. Andylw
          Andylw 21 July 2020 15: 35
          +3
          Putin is a member of the Communist Party
          1. St Petrov
            St Petrov 21 July 2020 15: 43
            -7
            Putin is a member of the Communist Party

            wrong what. Didn't sell the country. Probably they would have been expelled from the party - they would have known 30 years in advance how it would be.

            Here is Chubais - a member as a member. Elite of the CPSU. but they didn’t take United Russia, you guys
            1. Andylw
              Andylw 21 July 2020 15: 51
              -1
              I agree.
              Putin handed over the Amur Islands to China, 175 thousand sq km of shelf in the Barents Sea - to the Norwegians
              but this is, of course, a trifle
              not count
              as well as the bases abandoned by Putin in Cuba and Vietnam
              1. St Petrov
                St Petrov 21 July 2020 15: 59
                -5
                Putin handed over the Amur Islands to China, 175 thousand sq m of shelf in the Barents Sea - to the Norwegians


                means Russia has become smaller in area, during the reign of GDP? wassat
                How many square kilometers from what he took?

                After all, I almost gave everything laughing Googling? Will I read the numbers?

                PS to convey something to the Norwegians, you have to have something. But logic is not your strong point.

                as well as the bases abandoned by Putin in Cuba and Vietnam

                laughing

                Only two?

                1. Andylw
                  Andylw 21 July 2020 16: 35
                  -2
                  Well, I say - a trifle. does not count.
                  "in order to convey something to the Norwegians, one must possess something"
                  everything that Putin gave to China and the Norwegians has been our territory since Soviet times.
                  count
                  Crimea area - 27 thousand sq km
                  well, the shelf presented to the Norwegians, we will not count ... this is a mere trifle
                  islands on the Amur - 400 sq km
                  it means that Putin can still distribute 26600 sq km of our territory and still, Russia will be larger in area than before
                  and then this is it:
                  "does it mean that Russia has become smaller in area, during the reign of the GDP? wassat
                  How many square kilometers from what he took? "
                  will still be true
                  1. St Petrov
                    St Petrov 21 July 2020 16: 53
                    -1
                    In 2014, Russia received the right to 52 sq. km. seabed in the Okhotsk Sea

                    count what you missed lol do you think that's all?

                    In August 2015, Russia sent an application to the UN Commission to expand the boundaries of the continental shelf in the Arctic for 1,2 million sq. km.

                    laughing do you think that's all? Russia is just beginning. Since 2008, it has been on a straight course.

                    1. Andylw
                      Andylw 21 July 2020 16: 54
                      -5
                      wow ... who was that bottom?
                      which country?
                      1. St Petrov
                        St Petrov 21 July 2020 16: 57
                        -8
                        wow ... who was that bottom?

                        laughing under the law of the sea, the sea can only belong to any country within 12 miles

                        wow to myself.

                      2. Andylw
                        Andylw 21 July 2020 17: 01
                        -2
                        so, what is next? what has changed then?
                        here the shelf in the Barents Sea was ours, Russian, and the sun-faced gave it to the Norwegians.
                        the islands on the cupid were ours, the Russian ones - he gave them to China
                        what happened to the bottom in the Okhotsk Sea?
                        did we conquer it? bought? Did they give it to us? what is the merit of the sun?
                      3. St Petrov
                        St Petrov 21 July 2020 17: 18
                        -7
                        here the shelf in the Barents Sea was ours, Russian, and the sun-faced gave it to the Norwegians.


                        why are you a liar? You rush further with words than a woman with low social responsibility. Although what I mean - you're an oppositionist. This is the norm)

                        Our shelf was not. There was a disputed territory. Russia cannot give up what does not belong to her.

                        what happened to the bottom in the Okhotsk Sea?
                        did we conquer it? bought? Did they give it to us? what is the merit of the sun?


                        Yes, as with the Crimea - no merit. It all happens by itself.
                        By magic. It's actually easy.

                        It turns out that all countries, under any presidents, grow in land, except for Zelensky and Ukraine

                        PS Well, the numbers will be? You thought, since you show Volodya by square kilometers

                        More, less?
                      4. Andylw
                        Andylw 21 July 2020 17: 28
                        0
                        "The shelf was not ours. It was a disputed territory. Russia cannot give up what does not belong to it."
                        it's a lie!
                        we moved our maritime border because of this!
                        And the Sea of ​​Okhotsk is the internal sea of ​​Russia. there you can announce and declare anything. Our borders in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk have not changed!
                        alas, but you are confusing the exclusive economic zone and the borders of states (including sea ones). Read more on this topic and do not disgrace yourself
                        And yes, the territory (taking into account maritime boundaries) has become smaller by 147600 km
                      5. St Petrov
                        St Petrov 21 July 2020 17: 32
                        -4
                        under the law of the sea, the sea can be owned by any country only within 12 miles of the coast. This strip of sea is considered the territory of the country. The same as land.

                        Everything further than this strip is no longer the territory of the state, but within 370 kilometers from the coast (200 miles), the state has exclusive rights to fish, minerals, etc. It is an exclusive economic zone (EEZ).

                        in 2014, Russia took advantage of another clause of the maritime law, which reads approximately the following:

                        If the state proves that the seabed is an extension of the land of the state, then this seabed also belongs to the state.
                        And Russia was able to prove that the entire bottom of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk is an underwater continuation of our land. This was proved by geological scientists who made special measurements and samples of the seabed, and then provided all the data to the UN.


                        it's about magic
                      6. Andylw
                        Andylw 21 July 2020 17: 40
                        +4
                        yeah, so you don’t argue that you lied that the shelf in the Barents Sea did not belong to Russia. well. because this is stupid, because we have changed the state border with Norway.
                        In the case of the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, the state borders have not been changed. Russia in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk now has rights only to exploit and extract resources on this seabed.
                        And yes, the territory (taking into account maritime boundaries) has become smaller by 147600 km
                    2. St Petrov
                      St Petrov 21 July 2020 17: 37
                      -8
                      it's a lie!

                      when did the sovereignty of the Russian Federation extend to this shelf?

                      Want to know everything. When was this "primordially Russian land"?

                      yeah, so you don’t argue that you lied that the shelf in the Barents Sea did not belong to Russia


                      no laughing I argue.

                      And yes, the territory (taking into account maritime boundaries) has become smaller by 147600 km


                      laughing also the NATO base in Ulyanovsk (c)

                    3. Andylw
                      Andylw 21 July 2020 17: 47
                      +3
                      "when did the sovereignty of the Russian Federation extend to this shelf?"
                      since the collapse of the USSR
                      "I want to know everything. When was this 'primordially Russian land'?"
                      open a map of the ussr with state borders
                      and remember, lying is not good
                      and being illiterate is also a shame
                      do not disgrace yourself anymore and do not lie
                    4. St Petrov
                      St Petrov 21 July 2020 18: 03
                      -7
                      did the USSR have any disputes with the Norwegians? belay
                      Could the USSR do whatever it wanted in this zone? wassat
                    5. Andylw
                      Andylw 21 July 2020 18: 06
                      +3
                      see map of the ussr with state borders.
                      there is our shelf in the Barents Sea and ...
                      and on the claims of other countries, a strong power lays down with the device.
                      with the shelf before the Norwegians caved in ... who is next? Japanese?
                    6. St Petrov
                      St Petrov 21 July 2020 18: 07
                      -8
                      I asked a specific question about sovereignty over a specific territory.
                      What did the USSR have to do to fish there?
                      Do you deny there is a disputed territory between the Norwegians and the Soviets?

                      on the claims of other countries a strong power puts the device.

                      ) not everything is so simple, right?
                    7. Andylw
                      Andylw 21 July 2020 18: 16
                      +4
                      everything is clear.
                      on the claims of other countries, a strong power lays down with the device, and does not distribute its territories.
                      even Yeltsin did not do it, but Putin gave
                      that's all
                    8. St Petrov
                      St Petrov 21 July 2020 18: 18
                      -7
                      how boring you are. and you don't even write about lies anymore. About sovereignty over this territory from the USSR no longer need to ask you? No answer yet?

                      even Yeltsin did not do it, but Putin gave

                      laughing put flowers at the monument to Yeltsin

                    9. Andylw
                      Andylw 21 July 2020 18: 30
                      +3
                      you don't even write about lies anymore

                      what is the point of writing to a person who is not able to compare maps with the state borders of the ussr and russia?
                      this is a clinic
                      waiting for excuses to transfer smoked to the Japanese ... is this also a disputed territory? Yes?
                    10. Paranoid50
                      Paranoid50 21 July 2020 21: 29
                      0
                      Quote: s-t Petrov
                      how boring you are.

                      In vain they caught on - this is a seasonal influx of fresh regs with old hats.
                      Apparently, Oppa Hogwarts has another issue. True, judging by the "delay" that the object is trying to push, the teaching aids have not been updated there for a long time. Again, there is a classic cycloid - one maxim in a circle, from comment to comment. yes So, again, we wasted our time. hi
                  2. mehan
                    mehan 21 July 2020 19: 41
                    +5
                    Why are you arguing?
                    Tash s-t confuses the water area with the territory, and sovereignty with the right to use.
                    And in general, this is dew ...
    3. Krasnoyarsk
      Krasnoyarsk 21 July 2020 19: 55
      -2
      Quote: s-t Petrov

      Our shelf was not. There was a disputed territory. Russia cannot give up what does not belong to her.

      So let it remain a disputed territory. And now he is undeniably Norwegian. You, as I understand it, are happy.
    4. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 21 July 2020 21: 23
      +3
      Quote: Krasnoyarsk
      And now he is undeniably Norwegian.

      laughing laughing laughing Uh-huh, so Norwegian that there is nowhere more Norwegian. fellow Even the fish migrated from the water area, so as not to disturb the Norgs by chance. wassat
      And the norgi do not worry, they quietly gnaw their elbows. And the one who was then their supreme king, we curse our fellow citizens to this day. Becoming NATO secretary general, the uncle is trying to recoup, but the train left. And somewhere in Russia, the oppa bourgeoisie keep whining about the shelf being sold ... recourse
  2. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa 21 July 2020 19: 04
    0
    Quote: s-t Petrov
    only within 12 miles

    12 nautical miles are tervody adjacent to the coast of the state. Economic zone - 200 nautical miles. If you prove, like Chilingarov, that the shelf continues beyond 200 miles, you can submit the docks to the UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf.
    And you will be happy! laughing
  • Sergej1972
    Sergej1972 21 July 2020 22: 25
    +1
    The exclusive economic zone and the shelf zone are not part of the country's territory.
  • g1v2
    g1v2 22 July 2020 00: 20
    +5
    In fact, you are deliberately lying and sketching. The agreement with China initially provided for the border along the Amur forvater. The same Damansky, on which there were battles and the border post was given back under the USSR. The Soviet-Chinese border treaty of May 16, 1991 clarified and marked the line of the Russian-Chinese border practically along the entire length of its eastern part (east of Mongolia). Only one site remained undefined. The ownership of the islands that appeared on border rivers after the demarcation of the border line and appeared directly on the demarcated border line was to be determined in the future through consultations between the contracting parties. THAT IS THESE ISLANDS DIDN'T BELONG TO US - WERE DISPUTED AND THEIR SECTION ACCORDING TO THE SOVIET-CHINESE AGREEMENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN OCCURRED LATER. And in 2004 they were divided so that no one was offended. As a result, we are practically China's only neighbor. with whom he has no territorial disputes.
    It's funny about the Barents Sea - why did anyone think that we had given something of our own? There was a controversial area - it was divided in half. With the same aplomb it can be argued that it was Norway who gave us a part of their territory. THEY COUNTED IT AS THEIR. And they also have those who are dissatisfied with this treaty, who claim that their king has given up part of his territory. request
  • Dart2027
    Dart2027 21 July 2020 19: 25
    0
    Quote: AndyLW
    but this is, of course, a trifle

    Here is a detailed breakdown
    https://ruxpert.ru/%D0%98%D0%B7%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86_%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8
  • Narak-zempo
    Narak-zempo 22 July 2020 08: 56
    0
    You do not understand this other
  • Krasnoyarsk
    Krasnoyarsk 21 July 2020 19: 39
    0
    Quote: s-t Petrov
    Didn't sell the country.

    Yes? And how many lards of greenery were taken out of the country during his reign?
    On the one hand, it creates conditions under which "investments will flow into the country," and on the other hand, it does not interfere with the export of capital over the hill. And how is this to be understood?
    The country was torn apart, and he - "There will be no revision of the results of privatization"
  • snucerist
    snucerist 21 July 2020 16: 08
    +3
    Are you hinting at an analogy between the USSR and Russia?
    And on the imminent collapse of the latter following the example of the first?
    Now the guys are not pulling nails with machine tools, millions are pumped to offshores. Green American rubles.
    1. St Petrov
      St Petrov 21 July 2020 16: 09
      -8
      Now the guys are not pulling nails with machine tools, millions are pumped to offshores.


      The Party of Crimea transferred (with practically all military bases) the rest of the republics to offshore - having pumped the country. And you all about the millions - of which - half of the loans are repaid, for which machines and enterprises are bought

      The EP, unlike the CPSU, does not trade in the homeland and does not lower flags. Irony of Fate or Enjoy Your Bath.

      PS when the communists were the majority in the Duma in 1995 - Crimea was not returned either. If they were the majority now, Crimea would have remained Ukrainian as well.

      Straight 100%
      Grudinin would not need him either, like other miracle of the communists of our time (light red emo commies)
      1. Andylw
        Andylw 21 July 2020 16: 41
        -1
        United Russia voted for the transfer of the Amur Islands to China as a gift ... next in line to smoke?
        1. St Petrov
          St Petrov 21 July 2020 16: 44
          -5
          smoked next?



          are you still waiting? You can go home laughing expectations were reset

          PS Well, are we going to teach math? Add and subtract? How much was the area of ​​the Russian Federation at the time of Putin's coming to power and what is it now?

          I don't really follow. But I see you are savvy. Let's get the calculator

          EP voted for the transfer of the Amur Islands to China as a gift

          but about the Crimea as voted?
          Getting the calculator out again? We will measure the area wassat
          1. Andylw
            Andylw 21 July 2020 16: 52
            +2
            let's count.
            Crimea (27 thousand sq km) -amur islands (400 sq km) -shelf (175000 sq km) = -147600 sq km ...
            well, that's a trifle, right?
      2. snucerist
        snucerist 21 July 2020 16: 41
        +5
        Those. CPSU Traded Homeland?
        Strongly said!
        Is it okay that all the current leadership of Russia is a native of the CPSU? Every single person? From the party that, according to you, traded in the Motherland?
        The President of Russia is a former member of the CPSU.
        Prime Minister - originally from the Communist Party
        The Chairman of the State Duma is from the CPSU.
        The chairman of the SovFed is from the CPSU.
        The Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation is from the CPSU.
        The Minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs is from the CPSU.
        The FSB director is from the CPSU.
        The Chairman of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is from the CPSU.
        1. St Petrov
          St Petrov 21 July 2020 16: 44
          -8
          .e. CPSU Traded Homeland?
          Strongly said!
          Is it okay that all the current leadership of Russia is a native of the CPSU?

          laughing only Motherland is no longer traded. Maybe it was in the know?

          PS Chubais from the Communist Party too. I say - an elite place
          1. snucerist
            snucerist 21 July 2020 17: 00
            11
            Clear.
            Those. after the members of the CPSU renamed their party to United Russia, they no longer trade in their homeland?
            You have calmed me down.
            1. St Petrov
              St Petrov 21 July 2020 17: 25
              -8
              Those. after the members of the CPSU renamed their party to United Russia, they no longer trade in their homeland?


              it looks like it happened laughing Under the EP - it has grown - the area of ​​Russia has increased. And under the Communist Party of the Soviet Union - collapsed - decreased
            2. strelokmira
              strelokmira 21 July 2020 17: 57
              +3
              do they no longer sell their homeland?
              You have calmed me down.

              Well, as they do not trade, in 2005, 337 km² were sold to China, so well, they trade a little winked
        2. mehan
          mehan 21 July 2020 19: 44
          +1
          All of them are from the "fighting unit of the party".
          So rather.
        3. Narak-zempo
          Narak-zempo 22 July 2020 08: 59
          0
          They said about such "Member, but not a party member"
      3. Krasnoyarsk
        Krasnoyarsk 21 July 2020 19: 44
        +2
        Quote: s-t Petrov
        returned. If they were the majority now, Crimea would have remained Ukrainian as well.

        Are you a clairvoyant? Can I make an appointment? wassat
  • Krasnoyarsk
    Krasnoyarsk 21 July 2020 21: 11
    +1
    Quote: s-t Petrov

    They mastered the skill for several decades (first, they dragged nails from factories with a glance, then chairs with a proudly raised gaze, then machines). We finished it in 5 years.

    And you look at the current https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhX4dJCtEBk
    You will love it very much. Just have the courage to watch it to the end.
  • strelokmira
    strelokmira 21 July 2020 17: 37
    +1
    How does the opposition explain to itself the construction of new submarines? Aircraft? Helicopters? Ships?

    Urasha is hysterical lol You better knight guarantor in rusty armor, explain where are the 8 promised ash trees by 2020?
  • Sergey V.
    Sergey V. 21 July 2020 23: 25
    -1
    Business. Just business. The metal is supplied by private metallurgical companies. Many units are also produced in private enterprises. Moreover, they are not always of decent quality.
    Private subcontractors are involved in many of the work. At the same time, during the construction process, the cost of materials and work is constantly being reviewed.
    So dig deeper into yours ...
  • Peter Tverdokhlebov
    Peter Tverdokhlebov 22 July 2020 09: 42
    0
    6,5 years to build a submarine is ridiculous, in the US, Virginias are built for 2-3 years, and what is most interesting by 2027-2028 in Putin's Russia there will be ~ 10 Ash trees and in the USA ~ 30 Virginias, and all this thanks to the Western agent Putin.
  • CSKA
    CSKA 22 July 2020 09: 54
    +1
    Quote: s-t Petrov
    a red herring to sell the Motherland?
    a red herring to calm the patriots?

    You just don't understand. This is such an insidious plan of the West. In order to seize Russia, they raise its economy, the standard of living of the people, increase its gold and foreign exchange reserves, make it not borrow much from the West, rearm the army, force it to defeat the terrorists in the Caucasus, ISIS and their vassal Georgia. What do you not understand?
  • tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 21 July 2020 15: 17
    +7
    The first time I see a submarine propeller in the photo. Then the photo is not Ash M., rather Ash tree stump.
    1. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 21 July 2020 15: 36
      +4
      In the photo there is a twin-screw boat, Ash - single-screw ...
      1. Eldorado
        Eldorado 21 July 2020 15: 54
        +3
        This is "Severodvinsk" of the "Ash" project. He and "Ash-M" really have one propeller. And the photo shows one screw, not two.
        1. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 21 July 2020 15: 59
          +3
          Look carefully .... Either we build asymmetric boats, or it is still twin-screw. So the photo doesn't match.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. Cyril G ...
              Cyril G ... 21 July 2020 16: 04
              +1
              Once again you see the boat from the starboard side, the propeller is not located along the center plane of the ship. The second screw will not be visible from this angle
              1. Eldorado
                Eldorado 21 July 2020 16: 08
                +2
                Kirill, unfortunately, I can't attach normal photos of the launching of Severodvinsk and Novosibirsk. But there you can clearly see that there is only one screw. And there is only one screw on the models. You can google it.
                1. Cyril G ...
                  Cyril G ... 21 July 2020 16: 18
                  0
                  All thanks - figured it out. An unusual angle let me down. Attached below is a photo from a different angle.
          2. mdsr
            mdsr 21 July 2020 16: 04
            +4
            Quote: Cyril G ...
            Look carefully .... Either we build asymmetric boats, or it is still twin-screw. So the photo doesn't match.

            Cyril, this is really Severodvinsk. Take a closer look, at the back of the body it tapers in diameter.
            1. Cyril G ...
              Cyril G ... 21 July 2020 16: 08
              0


              Yes you are right. The unusual angle deceived. Could be mistaken for a twin screw.
              1. mdsr
                mdsr 21 July 2020 16: 13
                +2
                Here is an uncropped photo.
              2. Eldorado
                Eldorado 21 July 2020 16: 28
                0
                There, two screws are simply not needed, this is not an SSBN. One is enough. Pike, Kondor, Barrarud also have one propeller. By the way, the photo shows the withdrawal from the Novosibirsk workshop, 2019.
                1. Cyril G ...
                  Cyril G ... 21 July 2020 16: 29
                  0
                  Well, the 949 project is a twin-screw. And according to rumors, it was provided with very low noise. The noise level of pr.949 was only slightly higher than that of pr.971.
    2. Eldorado
      Eldorado 21 July 2020 15: 52
      0
      Where do you see the screw? It is covered! This is, if I'm not mistaken, "Severodvinsk".
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 21 July 2020 15: 57
        -1
        And these are not blades inside the cover, and there are many of them. repeat
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 21 July 2020 19: 14
          0
          Quote: tralflot1832
          And these are not blades inside the cover, and there are many of them.

          And "a lot" is a lope in your opinion?
          More than 10, or 12-15 pieces !? How do you kaeeetsya?
          1. tralflot1832
            tralflot1832 21 July 2020 19: 28
            0
            Now I looked with an armed glance as if nothing seemed to be the case. request
  • kapitan281271
    kapitan281271 21 July 2020 15: 19
    0
    two boats in 6,5 years, why not 16
    1. St Petrov
      St Petrov 21 July 2020 15: 23
      -9
      two boats in 6,5 years, why not 16


      with such posts, you must immediately sew it in advance under the avatar. While the captain is about time. Then you won't have time, you wake up as a marshal, and it feels like you're still a captain

    2. Voyager
      Voyager 21 July 2020 15: 36
      0
      Besides Ash and others are under construction.
    3. Hermit21
      Hermit21 21 July 2020 16: 32
      0
      Because several more are being built in parallel
  • codetalker
    codetalker 21 July 2020 15: 26
    -1
    So, if everything goes according to plan, by 2027 our fleet will have 9 Ash / Ash submarines?
    In your opinion, taking into account the extension of the terms of submarines of previous generations and other projects, is this the minimum sufficient number, is it extremely insufficient, or even very good?
    1. mdsr
      mdsr 21 July 2020 15: 50
      +5
      Britain by this time will have 7 multipurpose nuclear submarines Estiude, France has 6 Barracudas, the United States has more than 30 Virginias and 3 Seewulfs.
      Quote: codetalker
      taking into account the extension of the terms of submarines of previous generations

      They will then be 40 years old.
    2. 2 Level Advisor
      2 Level Advisor 21 July 2020 19: 37
      +2
      there will be no, unfortunately .. there are not so many construction docks to provide it all .. unfortunately by 2027 - not physically ..
      1. codetalker
        codetalker 21 July 2020 20: 17
        0
        Yesterday 8 and 9 were laid down.
        1. 2 Level Advisor
          2 Level Advisor 21 July 2020 21: 37
          +4
          You probably do not understand the difference between laid and started construction in the dock .. the laid section may not be in the dock, at least stand forever .. and when construction begins, they put it in the dock and occupy it for several years ..
  • parusnik
    parusnik 21 July 2020 15: 35
    +2
    Class! Two more submarines equipped with modern hypersonic weapons will be operational in 2028!
  • Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 21 July 2020 16: 03
    +1
    Strengthening our submarine fleet, good luck to the shipbuilders !!!
  • Piramidon
    Piramidon 21 July 2020 17: 43
    +3
    The two multipurpose nuclear submarines Voronezh and Vladivostok, laid down at Sevmash on July 20 on the same day of laying the ships, will become part of the Russian Navy in 2027-2028. This was announced by the head of the United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) Alexei Rakhmanov.

    Interestingly, if the terms, as is customary in our country, will move to the right, Rakhmanov will answer for the "bazaar", or, as always - "if only to crow, and then at least don't dawn." It seems that the management of USC is just guessing at ...
  • Alexey from Perm
    Alexey from Perm 21 July 2020 17: 46
    +5
    It takes 6.5 years to build a ship
  • tarakan
    tarakan 21 July 2020 18: 40
    0
    Explain, 6.5 years is not too long to build a submarine? I hope you already have a project? (No sarcasm, just interesting)
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 21 July 2020 19: 30
      -5
      Maybe 2,5 years are added to the reinsurance.
  • Imperial Technocrat
    Imperial Technocrat 21 July 2020 19: 55
    -3
    By the way, in 2022-2024, several multifunctional nuclear submarines of the 3rd generation will be modernized and returned to service.
  • megadeth
    megadeth 22 July 2020 10: 08
    0
    It takes a long time to build ... In seven years, submarines from the depths of the sea will fly into space ...