Russian warships will receive guided artillery shells

Warships of the Russian Navy, armed with a 100-mm A-190-1 artillery mount, will receive guided artillery shells in the near future. This was announced in an interview with TASS by the director general of the Central Research Institute "Petrel" Georgy Zakamenykh.

According to Zakamennykh, the 100-mm A-190-1 artillery mount is supplied for ships of the Russian fleet since 2012 and has already proven its effectiveness compared to Soviet-style artillery systems. The development of a new artillery mount was carried out on the instructions of the main command of the Russian Navy to replace the AK-176 artillery mount, which was the most massive in the fleet. Guided missiles are being developed for the new installation.

The practice of using A-190-01 in the course of the exercises confirms its effectiveness, which will increase even more with the introduction of the new generation of created ammunition, including guided ones. This is a matter of the near future

- said the general director of Burevestnik.

According to the Zakamennykh's statement, the new A-190-1 artillery installation is significantly superior in its most important characteristics to the AK-70 developed in the late 176s of the last century, the modernization potential of which has already been exhausted.

The 100-mm naval artillery mount A-190-01 is designed to arm surface ships with a displacement of 500 tons or more in order to hit a wide range of air, sea and coastal targets.

The gun is a rifled gun with two-sided supply of ammunition (to the left and to the right of the barrel) with a pendulum mechanism similar to that used on the gun of the AK-176 installation. The mass of the shot is 15.6 kg. Sighting range: surface target - more than 20 km, air target - up to 15 km. The rate of fire is up to 80 rounds per minute, the length of the continuous burst is 80 rounds.

Comments

[Jack O'Neill]

Warships of the Russian Navy, armed with a 100-mm A-190-1 artillery mount, will receive guided artillery shells in the near future. This was announced in an interview with TASS by the director general of the Central Research Institute "Petrel" Georgy Zakamenykh.

And what is the price of guided shells then? The Americans didn’t pull, but will they shoot with a "small" (20 inches)?
Well, if we pull, then no matter what. But even to doubt.

[Maz]

Quote: Jack O'Neill

Warships of the Russian Navy, armed with a 100-mm A-190-1 artillery mount, will receive guided artillery shells in the near future. This was announced in an interview with TASS by the director general of the Central Research Institute "Petrel" Georgy Zakamenykh.

And what is the price of guided shells then? The Americans didn’t pull, but will they shoot with a "small" (20 inches)?
Well, if we pull, then no matter what. But even to doubt.

Well, for tanks there are guided shells, why not have them on naval installations?

[Jack O'Neill]

Maybe not as a TOUR, but as a type of "Excalibur"? And 20 inches for TOUR ...

[Cyril G ...]

It's one thing a guided projectile for firing at sea / land targets is different for air ...

[Jack O'Neill]

Is it you for me or Mazu?

[alexmach]

Americans did not pull

And the Italians took and pulled, and even in a smaller caliber. It's a shame, right?

[Jack O'Neill]

And the Italians took and pulled, and even in a smaller caliber. It's a shame, right?

Macaroni cheaters, nothing surprising.

[Serg65]

Quote: Jack O'Neill

"small" (20 inches)

Do not care yourself a little boy !!!! Yamato had 18 inches ...

[Jack O'Neill]

Do not care yourself a little boy !!!! Yamato had 18 inches ...

0.20 inches *

[Serg65]

Quote: Jack O'Neill

0.20 inches *

To be really accurate, it's 4 inches !!!

[Jack O'Neill]

To be really accurate, it's 4 inches !!!

Oh, and I counted 76.2mm. Ahaha.))

[Serg65]

Quote: Jack O'Neill

Oh, and I counted 76.2mm. Ahaha.))

Ahaha ... well, who pulls your tongue? 1 inch is 2,54 cm, respectively 7,62 cm is 3. THREE inches !!!!

[Sentinel-vs]

We don’t know how many millimeters an inch, but here we are reasoning for guided ammunition. :)

[Jack O'Neill]

This is all Soviet education. What can I do here.

[Sentinel-vs]

20 inches is roughly 500 mm. Chet you messed up.

[Jack O'Neill]

20 inches is roughly 500 mm. Chet you messed up.

Yes, I didn't draw a zero.

[Cyril G ...]

Shot weight - 15.6 kg.

This is the weight shell, and not a shot, the difference is clear I hope?

Artillery shot - a set of elements of artillery ammunition for the production of one shot. Main elements - shell, fuse, powder charge, charge igniter (capsule sleeve), sleeve.
The UOF-58 round includes an OF-58 projectile weighing 15,6 kg.

[senima56]

This wording "in the near future" - can mean anything! And "in a few days" and "in a few years"! You either say when specifically - or keep quiet about it!

[military_cat]

Another talk about the base on the moon in 2015.

[Pavel57]

I wonder what is invested in the concept - guided missile?

[Maz]

Quote: Pavel57

I wonder what is invested in the concept - guided missile?

Cobra (complex index - 9K112 (-1), missiles - 9М112 (M), according to the classification of the US and NATO Defense Ministry - AT-8 Songster, literally "pevun") combat tanks, armored vehicles, small targets such as DOT, DZOT and low-flying helicopters. Shooting can be carried out from the standard 125-mm smoothbore 2A46 cannon of T-64 and T-80 tanks.

[Kurare]

Quote: Pavel57

I wonder what is invested in the concept - guided missile?

Good question , and this had to start. I think that this is not about managed shell, and shell with controlled blasting.

[vVvAD]

Hardly - they would have written about controlled detonation. In such a caliber, you can do both controlled blasting and correction / flight control. So, most likely, depending on the type of projectile, both the first (if necessary) and the second.
It is possible to implement an analogue of KUVT, only to what extent is it expedient and economically justified? On ships, even small ones, there are UVP cells: in them both medium-range missiles, anti-ship missiles, and PLRK can be loaded.
The main purpose of the installation will be work on the ground and air - here it is more expedient with the so-called. cost will use just guided projectiles.

[Kurare]

Quote: vVvAD

Hardly - they would have written about controlled detonation.

Too often there are bloopers among journalists. Therefore, I assume that we are talking about a projectile with a controlled detonation. In my opinion, a guided projectile is not a topic for 100 mm. Whether it's 130 or even 152 mm

[vVvAD]

No, technologically everything will fit perfectly. And what they had in mind - it will finally be clear only in fact.
And about bloopers, even in specialized publications, I completely agree.

[Kurare]

Quote: vVvAD

... technologically, everything will fit.

Technologically - yes, but for practical reasons - I don't see the point. Too "small" projectile at 100 mm, with regard to explosives.

[Strashila]

Or the ATGM system, which are placed on tanks or corrected projectiles.

[Pavel57]

Is it an ATGM for 20 km. shoot?

[andrey-ivanov]

And what is the price of guided shells then? The Americans didn’t pull, but will they shoot with a "small" (20 inches)?

"
20 inches ???? 100mm is about 4 actually ...

[barin]

the A-190-1 artillery mount is significantly superior in its most important characteristics to the AK-70 developed in the late 176s of the last century

So they have a different caliber.

[rocket757]

Okay, time will tell what ours will do.
Many people are talking about smart ammunition. Not many can afford it in significant quantities.

[yfast]

"in the near future they will receive guided artillery shells"
Why tryndet about the prospect? Would do and report who received.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

In fact, guided missiles are produced and put into service in almost all technically advanced countries, including the USA and the USSR / RF. But there was not enough money in the USA for shells for Zamvolt, but this is as stupid as Zamvolt himself. The Americans came up with an ammunition more than 2 meters long and weighing 102 kg (for a 155-mm cannon, yeah), which is essentially a rocket launched by a cannon shot and flying 150 km. And this technobred (a conventional missile with such performance characteristics would have been cheaper) was indeed recognized as too expensive, and there are quite a few conventional guided shells in the USA ...

[Cyril G ...]

No matter how it turned out now that the projectile for firing at the NLC is more expensive than the cheap missiles with an RKTU like the Pantsyrevsky ones.

[huntsman650]

For shooting at the VTS there have been shells with a radar fuse for a long time.

[Cyril G ...]

You will not believe! I am aware that we have had a 57 mm projectile with a radar fuse since the 60s. 20th century. Then the fleet began to receive twin and quad AU ZiF-31/71/75 ...

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Did it say somewhere that they brought us guided shells for firing at the NLC? :))))) I think they will put completely ordinary shells to support the landing

[Cyril G ...]

Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk

I think they will put completely ordinary ones, to support the landing

I don’t see the point, however, and no sense either ...

[huntsman650]

Rather correctable. The target will need to be highlighted.

[Pavel57]

Quote: huntsman650

Rather correctable. The target will need to be highlighted.

Is it real to highlight the target at 20 km?

[huntsman650]

Yes, from a drone or a scout, behind enemy lines)))

[Ros 56]

An interesting machine gun with a caliber of 100 mm. and even with guided missiles. Just for the Banderlog fleet. One turn and the fleet is over.

[Pavel57]

Quote: huntsman650

Yes, from a drone or a scout, behind enemy lines)))

So the UAV must also be placed on the ship.
And where is the rear of the enemy squadron?