US-Ukrainian exercises Sea Breeze 2020 began in the Black Sea

68
US-Ukrainian exercises Sea Breeze 2020 began in the Black Sea

In the Black Sea today, July 20, the US-Ukrainian naval exercises Sea Breeze 2020 will start, the press service of the US Navy reported.

According to the report, a total of 27 warships, 19 aircraft and two thousand servicemen from nine NATO member countries and partners of the alliance will be involved in the exercises. The US, Bulgaria, France, Georgia, Norway, Romania, Spain, Turkey and Ukraine will take part in the maneuvers.



The US Navy destroyer USS Porter (DDG 78), which entered the Black Sea and the US Navy's P-8 anti-submarine patrol aircraft, will take part in the exercise from the United States. From NATO, combat ships of the Second Standing Naval Group (SNMG-2) and the Second Standing Mine Action Group will take part in the maneuvers. In the command of the 6th operational fleet The United States previously reported that Porter was sent to the Black Sea to "strengthen regional maritime stability and participate in the 20s of the joint US-Ukrainian Sea Breeze 2020 exercise."

The return of the destroyer USS Porter to the Black Sea confirms the commitment of the 6th Fleet and the US Navy to our allies and NATO partners. Our participation in multinational exercises, such as Sea Breeze, is a real demonstration of the US’s determination to defend Europe collectively

- said in a statement.

Earlier, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine stated that in connection with the pandemic of the coronavirus, it was decided to limit the Sea Breeze 2020 exercises to the marine part only, without conducting land maneuvers. At the same time, the "most ambitious exercises" were announced, involving up to 20 countries, including Japan and South Korea.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    68 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +8
      20 July 2020 10: 41
      Svidomye sailing or rowing? If sailing - already progress.
      1. 0
        20 July 2020 10: 49
        Nikolay Petrov ...Svidomye sailing or rowing? If sailing - already progress.

        On amero-boats without toilets.
        1. 0
          20 July 2020 10: 51
          Alexander, after the participation of Svidomo in these exercises, I think that Amer’s boats will remain without toilets.
      2. 0
        20 July 2020 10: 55
        There boilers are purely on coal)
        1. +2
          20 July 2020 10: 57
          Quote: Trevis
          There boilers are purely on coal)

          So after all, the coal remained in the Donbass.
          1. +5
            20 July 2020 11: 20
            I looked at the map, and there was a Su-57 over Kiev!
            What a joke? Apparently this is our troll exercise with GPS, or something has begun)))
      3. +5
        20 July 2020 11: 23
        Quote: Nikolai Petrov
        Svidomye sailing or rowing? If sailing - already progress.

        Yeah ...recourse Pechalka lol "WHITE THEIR sail, so lonely,against the background of steel ships"
      4. +1
        20 July 2020 11: 29
        On inflatable mattresses. good
      5. +6
        20 July 2020 13: 03
        Quote: Nikolai Petrov
        Svidomye sailing or rowing? If sailing - already progress.


        Why sail here:

      6. 0
        21 July 2020 08: 28
        They are in the form of targets))
    2. +5
      20 July 2020 10: 50
      US-Ukrainian naval exercises Sea Breeze 2020 start.
      One destroyer of the United States and Ukraine received a political orgasm. It is understandable with this incompleteness, but do the same Americans really not understand that they cannot cope with Russia with their American short-term care (I apologize)? They understand, but continue to mischief with those whom our leadership still considers to be their own (these snot by a single people have already reached the liver). People die in LDN every day, and Russian traders continue to trade with the country screaming that Russia is an aggressor and an enemy. What does it mean? Full of Sewarilism, Salvador Dali is resting.
    3. +9
      20 July 2020 10: 51
      Well, without Georgia and Ukraine, the main partners are nowhere;
    4. 0
      20 July 2020 10: 52
      How unreasonable to arrange such provocations near Russia in the practically inland Russian Sea to the alien ships of NATO!
      Our generals, through military attaches in Moscow, have already hinted that Russia will easily suppress the full determination of the American military in the event of the slightest provocation, especially since at least six NATO ships are already in the waters of the Black Sea, at a relatively short distance from the Crimea, some of which are escort ships, and some are combat ships.

      “The Russian Su-24s will easily“ greet ”the American missile destroyer during the NATO exercises, as it was with the Donald Cook, and probably even more than once,
      recalling how the provocations near the Russian shores end.
      And this is on the eve of the start of Kavkaz-2020.
      Did they eat Wuhu?
    5. +5
      20 July 2020 10: 54
      Well, they will again destroy the environment. wink Right now, again, the flounder with crab scare. And the bulls ?, I’ll tell you this is not some kind of sprat-eating. Here, the bulls are somehow especially sorry for me, they become smaller.
    6. 0
      20 July 2020 10: 54
      Today, the bookmark is in Kerch, according to rumors, Putin should be at the ceremony. The Crimea must have bristled. We are waiting for news from the State Department about the "wrong" actions of the Russian Navy and Air Force. And the Romanians have been equipped with rackets on their English ships? Or is it a barge with guns. In the title photo.
      1. +6
        20 July 2020 11: 32
        The bookmark will be. And Putin will be.
        And on the Romanian (former British) frigates Type 23 anti-ship missiles were never installed. laughing
        1. 0
          20 July 2020 11: 35
          For Romanians matches (rockets) are not a toy. They do not trust partners.
          1. +1
            20 July 2020 11: 36
            Well, they have anti-ship missiles. The newest P-15 of the 1960s !!! The maximum firing range is as much as 80 km! wassat
            1. -1
              20 July 2020 11: 39
              These are those who launch from the capsule with a sledgehammer. The time of Ochakov and the conquest of the Crimea?
              1. +1
                20 July 2020 12: 41
                They are from the times when the ancient Ukrainians dug the Black Sea. lol
    7. +1
      20 July 2020 11: 12
      Where is Lithuania, Estonia? Why are they not expressing concern?
      1. +3
        20 July 2020 11: 25
        They can’t come off .... they wash dishes in England and Ireland.
      2. 0
        20 July 2020 11: 28
        Just passed through Popengaen to Rotrrdam.
    8. -10
      20 July 2020 11: 12
      But this destroyer alone has more tomahawks porter than the caliber of the entire Black Sea fleet of Russia ...
      1. +3
        20 July 2020 11: 32
        Just let him try to launch something wrong. Before launching, it will give itself out to the Khan radar to the pentagon in Washington.
        1. -11
          20 July 2020 11: 37
          yeah ... the only thing left is to hope for a nuclear baton, when the missile power of only one American destroyer is greater than the missile power of the entire Russian Black Sea Fleet ...
          and there are 67 such destroyers in the ranks of the amers ... yeah ...
          1. 0
            20 July 2020 11: 47
            At the moment, he is the only one near our shores. Its salvo is not even pretentious for us and they know it. So when there are 30 of them around us at launch range, then you can rejoice. Wrap yourself in a sheet and crawl in the direction known to such "experts" ...
            1. -13
              20 July 2020 12: 00
              with a launch range of 1200 km, they can reach the Crimea even from the Mediterranean Sea, without even entering the range of our coastal missile systems. and you don't need 30 destroyers, 3-4 destroyers are enough to completely destroy the air defense of the Crimea, for example ... it is easy to check by counting the number of S-400/300 launchers on the territory of the Crimea and the Black Sea Fleet ships. a volley of 300 tomahawks is almost impossible for us to repulse
              1. 0
                20 July 2020 12: 05
                He is alone on our shores. And are our submarines all at the bases? The easiest answer from the Russian Navy to these exercises. And this is definitely not dizeluhi.
                1. -7
                  20 July 2020 12: 23
                  I do not want to disappoint you, but on the Black Sea we have just diesel people. was 6, now 5 (1-under repair).
                  the rest, with all their desire, on the Black Sea will not reach
                  1. +1
                    20 July 2020 12: 32
                    Yes, I know that there are diesel men on the Black Sea, I'm not talking about them. On the Black Sea we have enough strength to soak an adversary. I’m in other regions. It is enough for the submarine to leave the pier in the north and the Far East. Red missile launch buttons on the adversaries will block and will be produced only electronic launches, and that's nothing. And the land under your house has not yet been sold to Europe?
                    1. -4
                      20 July 2020 12: 37
                      well, yes, yes. only the nuclear baton remains.
                      without her in any way.
                      On the Black Sea, our fleet is the second most powerful after the Turkish one, even without American destroyers
      2. +7
        20 July 2020 11: 35
        This very destroyer has more tomahawk porter than the calibers of the entire Russian Black Sea fleet.
        At least I understood it myself. that dullness overcame, or the manual is still the same,
        1. -11
          20 July 2020 11: 45
          you would at least google it before you embarrass yourself ..
          I wrote the pure truth
      3. +2
        20 July 2020 11: 42
        Quote: AndyLW
        But this destroyer alone has more tomahawks porter than the caliber of the entire Black Sea fleet of Russia ...

        Those. from Onyx, Caliber and Uranus will be one hundred percent repulsed?
        1. -12
          20 July 2020 11: 47
          add up the number of missiles indicated on the ships of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, compare with 96 Arlie Burke missiles and the truth will be revealed to you ...
          1. +3
            20 July 2020 11: 49
            Quote: AndyLW
            the truth will be revealed to you

            You have already revealed the truth to me.
            Quote: AndyLW
            this very destroyer has more tomahawk porter than the calibers of the entire Russian Black Sea fleet ...

            What will it be to fight back?
            1. -9
              20 July 2020 12: 01
              with a launch range of 1200 km, they can reach the Crimea even from the Mediterranean Sea, without even entering the range of our coastal missile systems. and you don't need 30 destroyers, 3-4 destroyers are enough to completely destroy the air defense of the Crimea, for example ... it is easy to check by counting the number of S-400/300 launchers on the territory of the Crimea and the Black Sea Fleet ships. a volley of 300 tomahawks is almost impossible for us to repulse
              1. +1
                20 July 2020 12: 48
                Quote: AndyLW
                with a launch range of 1200 km, they can reach the Crimea even from the Mediterranean Sea,

                Clear
                Quote: AndyLW
                3-4 destroyers are enough to completely destroy the Crimean air defense, for example ... this is easy to verify by counting the number of S-400/300 launchers in the territory of Crimea and the Black Sea Fleet

                and we will again express concern?
                Quote: AndyLW
                a volley of 300 tomahawks is almost impossible for us to repulse

                Who told you this .... or did you decide that yourself?
                The fleet has a minimum of 72 Buks on pr. 11356, 64 S-300f in Moscow, 18th GvZRP 27 S-400, 12th ZRP 27 S-400, 1096th ZRP 216 Tor * 2M ..... and + fighter aircraft of the Black Sea Fleet and the Aerospace Forces ... and I forgot 12 more Pantsirei-1C.
                And on the destroyer Porter, you still haven't said what he will fight back? After all, 90 different anti-ship missiles will attack him in one salvo as soon as he starts pre-launch work!
                1. -5
                  20 July 2020 13: 06
                  you forgot to count another gun, arrow, needle, etc. then it turns out generally a complete openwork.
                  it remains only to multiply this number of air defense missiles by the probability of each missile being hit by a tomahawk-type target and compare it with the potential number of missiles from 4 destroyers.
                  I already wrote about fighting off - the launch range of the tomahawks is 1200 km, our PCRs are 260.
                  may be allowed out of the Mediterranean Sea
                  1. +6
                    20 July 2020 13: 22
                    Quote: AndyLW
                    the probability of hitting a tomahawk-like target with each air defense missile system and compare it with the potential number of missiles from 4 destroyers.

                    laughing We started with one destroyer in the Black Sea, then there were 3 destroyers but already in the Mediterranean, and they shot at your order throughout the Crimea, and now there are 4 destroyers and everything is in Sevastopol good
                    Young man, if 4 American destroyers shoot at Sevastopol, then a big nuclear mushroom grows over your beloved USA .... and then there are no options! This is a war, a young man, not a local conflict .. wink
                    1. -4
                      20 July 2020 13: 53
                      you probably didn't even read my comment that you replied to.
                      there I wrote about 3-4 destroyers and the Mediterranean Sea ...
                      1. +1
                        20 July 2020 13: 55
                        Quote: AndyLW
                        you probably haven't even read my comment

                        Her, I'd better go and read Murzilka! hi
                        1. -4
                          20 July 2020 13: 57
                          Her, I'd better go and read Murzilka!

                          is this your level?
                        2. +6
                          20 July 2020 14: 08
                          Quote: AndyLW
                          is this your level?

                          My dear, the fullness of the philosophy of this magazine can only be understood in adulthood ... I envy your youth Yes
                  2. +2
                    20 July 2020 13: 24
                    Quote: AndyLW
                    you forgot to count another gun, arrow, needle, etc. then it turns out generally a complete openwork.

                    Why the Torah and Buki do not suit you ... although it is understandable, they do not suit you at all, they are not very democratic recourse
            2. +4
              20 July 2020 12: 16
              Who are you asking? It doesn't understand, it's jammed.))
          2. 0
            21 July 2020 16: 15
            Quote: AndyLW
            96 rockets Arlie Burke and you will discover the truth ...


            He had never carried 96 cruise missiles before. At best, CDs occupy up to 40 percent of the cells.
            In turn, in order to penetrate Burke's missile defense system and disable it, you need to have 24-32 anti-ship missiles in a salvo
      4. +1
        20 July 2020 15: 08
        And of course you will not refuse to say how many calibers does the Black Sea Fleet have? And of course you have service docks about loading all Mark 41 cells exclusively with axes, instead of the necessary missiles and PLUR? laughing
    9. +2
      20 July 2020 11: 15
      The return of the destroyer USS Porter to the Black Sea confirms
      once again, that with the "walking" ships in the American navy is tight, despite the abundance of pennants
    10. +1
      20 July 2020 11: 16
      The return of the destroyer USS Porter to the Black Sea confirms
      , who would doubt that the United States has an entire destroyer on the move. We are looking forward to Zumbolt in the Black Sea, ah scheduled work, after Saturday. feel
      1. -1
        20 July 2020 11: 54
        Maybe they won't get it, they don't let it go far from the coast. I think it's not casual. One only worthy crossing through the Panama Canal and get on the flyover for repairs.
    11. 0
      20 July 2020 11: 17
      As if ours, by negligence, this R-8 was not shot down. All the same, the head of state will be nearby.
    12. -6
      20 July 2020 11: 19
      And they wanted to lay down on the Russian underwater surveillance system in the Black Sea.
      1. +4
        20 July 2020 11: 44
        Quote: bad3nbaden
        And they wanted to lay down on the Russian underwater surveillance system in the Black Sea.

        Ahhh, are they all submarines? And I was naive, I thought that all the surface ...
    13. +1
      20 July 2020 11: 25
      Norway in the Black Sea. The Japanese in the Baltic. ZdOrovo recourse
      1. 0
        20 July 2020 12: 45
        You can quickly fix it. Russia and Venezuela with Cuba in the Gulf of Mexico. fellow
    14. +1
      20 July 2020 11: 38
      And we will have to participate even without an invitation, and this is a plus.
    15. 0
      20 July 2020 12: 01
      Our Wait slowly slowly start the engines on their planes, slowly slowly take off with a couple of regiments and slowly slowly drive this herd into the Black Sea.
    16. +1
      20 July 2020 12: 09
      Quote: Serg65
      Quote: bad3nbaden
      And they wanted to lay down on the Russian underwater surveillance system in the Black Sea.

      Ahhh, are they all submarines? And I was naive, I thought that all the surface ...

      Actually, this system is of a wide range of applications, not only for underwater, but also for surface conditions.
      1. 0
        20 July 2020 12: 53
        Quote: rgiasg
        this system is a wide range

        I know my friend wink
    17. -3
      20 July 2020 13: 05
      Quote: Serg65

      Who told you this .... or did you decide that yourself?
      The fleet has a minimum of 72 Buks on pr. 11356, 64 S-300f in Moscow, 18th GvZRP 27 S-400, 12th ZRP 27 S-400, 1096th ZRP 216 Tor * 2M ..... and + fighter aircraft of the Black Sea Fleet and the Aerospace Forces ... and I forgot 12 more Pantsirei-1C.
      And on the destroyer Porter, you still haven't said what he will fight back? After all, 90 different anti-ship missiles will attack him in one salvo as soon as he starts pre-launch work!

      you forgot to count another gun, arrow, needle, etc. then it turns out generally a complete openwork.
      it remains only to multiply this number of air defense missiles by the probability of each missile being hit by a tomahawk-type target and compare it with the potential number of missiles from 4 destroyers.
      I already wrote about fighting off - the launch range of the tomahawks is 1200 km, our PCRs are 260.
      may be allowed out of the Mediterranean Sea
      1. 0
        20 July 2020 15: 33
        they forgot to count another gun, an arrow, a needle, and so on. then it turns out generally a complete openwork.
        it remains only to multiply this number of air defense missiles by the probability of each missile being hit by a tomahawk-type target and compare it with the potential number of missiles from 4 destroyers.
        I already wrote about fighting off - the launch range of the tomahawks is 1200 km, our PCRs are 260.
        may be allowed out of the Mediterranean Sea

        One launch of "Bastion" is enough for NATO exercises to end ahead of schedule .. All "tomogavki" still need to be sent in the right direction, in order to do this, intelligence is needed, which, with all your desire, is not possible from the middle sea ..
    18. +1
      20 July 2020 13: 06
      On the other side, only the ENEMY! There are no "partners" and there weren't any.
      So, all the attention and care for the most reliable, loyal friends of the country, for their own armed forces and for our people !!!
      And then the devil himself is not a brother to us !!!
    19. 0
      20 July 2020 13: 28
      The Sumerians, the only submarine that is welded to the pier so that it doesn’t drown, will be tied with car cameras, then cut off from the pier and sail to trash the Russian fleet. Before that, they attach a sail and oars to the boat, and then guests go to Neptune full forward to the bottom of the sea.
    20. -4
      20 July 2020 14: 23
      Quote: El Dorado
      On inflatable mattresses. good

      The Americans already flew into space on trampolines. So wait a little with boo-ha-ha.
    21. -3
      20 July 2020 16: 52
      Against whom are the teachings ..? In the days of the USSR, this would not have dreamed in a nightmare ..
      You need to end with this outskirts, make the district agrarian of it .. Damn it.
    22. 0
      20 July 2020 20: 15
      So this is in connection with them, or with the arrival of the president / or one or the other does not interfere! ... I have airplanes here fueled by jet circles ?!
    23. The comment was deleted.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"