Trump announced the victory of the United States in two "wonderful" world wars

78

The network is discussing a statement made today by the US president. The owner of the White House spoke about American participation in the world wars. According to Donald Trump, the United States has won two world wars. However, his other remark on this subject is being discussed.
Trump called the two world wars "beautiful."

President of the U.S.A:



We won two world wars. In two world wars. In two beautiful world wars.

After this statement, users in the US itself ironically stated that Donald Trump was not all right with epithets. A few comments from American users on the net:

Listen, somebody in the White House! Teach the president the correct use of the word "beautiful."

Not for the first time I pay attention. Trump had a "wonderful" conversation with Korean Kim, a "wonderful" conversation with Chinese Xi, and now his wars are also "wonderful." We may not know, but Trump's word means something else ...

This statement was made by the US president for FoxNews, arguing that the United States today is returning to its former level after a protracted crisis that no one could have thought of before. According to Donald Trump, the United States will overcome these difficulties and "win, as it did before, as it has always done."

According to Trump, the US "won the Fort Bragg wars, and now they (the protesters) are opposed to this name." The US President said he was against it.
78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    19 July 2020 20: 52
    Trump is more and more talking "wonderful" nonsense! fool As if something "beautiful in its weight" fell on his head, and obviously repeatedly fool fool fool !!!
    1. +12
      19 July 2020 20: 56
      And even the Americans themselves understand what nonsense this is.
    2. +7
      19 July 2020 21: 04
      I thought that after George W. Bush, Americans will not be admitted to the presidency delusional... I made a mistake.
      1. +2
        19 July 2020 23: 41
        Chief of the Redskins (Nazarius)
        I thought that after George W. Bush, the Americans would not admit delusions to the presidency ... I was wrong.
        With what fright? After Reagan, one continuous degradation, and they are not even ashamed of it. It got to the point that the secretary of state under Obamka the monkey publicly declared that being stupid is quite a trend ...
    3. +26
      19 July 2020 21: 34
      From what!? For the United States, they were truly beautiful. They didn’t have to throw millions into machine guns in waves, slow down the best army machine of the 20th century, tank groups of 3 Reichs with desperate counterattacks of the Red Army, US citizens did not have to endure daily air strikes on civilian infrastructure that reached the atomic level by the end of the war, etc. . etc.
      1. +8
        20 July 2020 01: 06
        Quote: Cyril G ...
        For the United States, they were truly beautiful.

        So, they perfectly untied them, while remaining perfectly on the outskirts. Later, they pulled themselves together perfectly to the distribution of hats. It is so beautiful to be among the winners, while having a maximum of beautiful nishtyaks. I didn't lie.
      2. +6
        20 July 2020 06: 14
        Quote: Cyril G ...
        They didn't have to throw millions in waves at machine guns

        In addition, after the first, the United States reduced its national debt, after the second, it gained myrrh economic dominance. Therefore, for the United States, the wars were really wonderful, and Trump just cynically admitted this. Tellingly, he doesn't care how other subjects relate to this.
    4. +2
      19 July 2020 22: 03
      The main nonsense here
      The United States won two world wars.
      1. +1
        19 July 2020 23: 29
        What, in fact, confuses you? The war is won by the one who received the most benefits from the victory, not the one who made the most effort. And this, as it is not regrettable, is the USA .. And the USSR lost it, having lost a colossal amount of property and population, in general - without any decent compensation. Do not count as such freeloaders and loafers from the socialist camp? And most importantly, we lost millions of convinced and savvy communists, and this turned out to be fatal for the Union. For those who died were those who definitely would not have allowed the development of events in the country after the death of Comrade Stalin, and led to the collapse of the Soviet Union ..
        1. +8
          20 July 2020 00: 02
          with all the sacrifices, don't you dare say that the USSR lost. we are celebrating victory, and by speaking of defeat you are playing into the hands of our enemy. The victims are enormous, but nevertheless, in the fire of this horror, the very people who built a superpower, went into space ... and so on were forged. I will not paint, we are in the know. the price of victory was enormous.
          and the states won too. since it was after the Second World War that they became super-deous, along with the USSR.
          1. 0
            20 July 2020 10: 55
            Will you still tell me what to dare? Don't take on a lot? Once again, for the alternatively gifted, as a result of the war, the USSR did not receive compensation for its losses and costs. And this is a loss. Of the participants, only staffers won. Point.
            1. +1
              20 July 2020 20: 22
              ..by the results of the war, the USSR did not receive compensation for its losses and costs. And this is a loss.
              No, this is not a loss. Losing the war is the loss of state sovereignty, the loss of the Army and other state. institutions, and, finally, external management. Germany has completely sucked all of this after May 1945, since it was she who lost the war. Point .
            2. 0
              22 July 2020 11: 03
              yes I will, because I think you take on a lot, drawing conclusions of this kind. and you throw too unfounded words: how do you assess what the USSR received as scientific developments of the Third Reich? how can this be assessed in the category of the scientific impetus that the USSR received after the VICTORY in the Second World War? I'm not even talking about the thousands of trains that exported everything of value from Germany. Of course, human losses are invaluable.
              But nevertheless: the whole country will celebrate VICTORY on May 9, but do I understand correctly that you are sitting and grieving over defeat?
          2. 0
            20 July 2020 11: 11
            we are celebrating victory
            If they were more literate, they would know that the Victory Parade under the USSR was held THREE times - in the 45th, on the 20th and 40th years .. That's it. And from the 47th to the 65th, May 9th was a working day. And I think - the USSR and Comrade Stalin knew better whether we had something to celebrate or not. Remember - forever, but celebrate ..
        2. +4
          20 July 2020 07: 13
          Dear Pavel, you are confusing the win / lose in the war and the financial results of the war. The USSR won the war, Germany lost the war. The result of the war for the USSR: destroyed farms, many millions of victims of our citizens, sorrow and lamentation throughout the country. The result of the war for the United States: the dollar is the world currency, the United States is the world financial power, robbing the rest of the world. The United States achieved this throughout the 20th century, and was able to achieve this after the 2nd World War, which they themselves inflated, relying on the financial resources of the Anglo-Saxons and other Western "democracies".
          But the financial result is a temporary victory. The end of the Anglo-Saxon financial empire is near. The collapse of the dollar-based financial system immediately turns the United States into something like England, which still cannot recover from the collapse of the British empire: there are many teeth, but you cannot bite anyone, so you have to bark loudly, attracting everyone's attention.
          So, henceforth, do not confuse winning / losing a war with the financial results of a war. Such confusion is a sign of poor knowledge and understanding of history, if it is not an outright lie. But in the latter case, other authorities must deal with this.
          1. 0
            20 July 2020 10: 58
            Well, you will teach me more here .. What does the financial results have to do with it? From losses in the war, including human losses, the Union was never able to recover. And once again, the worst loss is 4 million conscious communists. It was their absence that made possible the slide of socialism to death under Khrushchev and Brezhnev.
            1. +1
              20 July 2020 20: 33
              Quote: paul3390
              Well, you will teach me more here ...

              You need to learn at school, not here. Here you and your nonsense look absolutely wretched.
            2. 0
              22 July 2020 11: 06
              you have everything mixed together: people, horses, communism ... you are good at drawing conclusions about the foresight or short-sightedness of people, and so you are extremely short-sighted in the reasons for the collapse of the USSR. It did not start because of the death of the communists, as you put it. The processes were much more complicated and began in the heads of the top. I see no reason to even think about this topic, tk. it is huge and complex and, moreover, has nothing to do with the essence of our conversation.
              Quote: paul3390
              tons of losses in the war, including human, the Union was never able to recover

              The USSR FULLY recovered from its losses. The population of the USSR after the Second World War was in the end more than before the Second World War. I am already silent about GDP and other macroeconomic indicators, industrial growth. agriculture and others.
              Purely intuitively, I understand what you mean. Yes, it is difficult to name a victory in the war, which claimed the lives of 27 million people, I used to be more ... harsh, I also thought when I was young, but now I understand that this is a very big mistake and stupidity. To affirm this is to nullify all achievements and sacrifices. Again, I will miss everything that the USSR received after the Second World War. and this ALL covers all losses.
              I am also sure that if you told some veteran or his grandson that we lost the Second World War, he would have spat in your face, or even not only spat. Think about what you are saying. Put emotions aside.
        3. -2
          20 July 2020 09: 06
          Quote: paul3390
          And the USSR lost it, having lost a colossal amount of property and population, in general - without any decent compensation.

          That is, the appearance of the socialist countries, the ATS and the CMEA, a joint vote at the UN, and the creation of the UN itself — are unworthy compensation?
          Oh yes you say
          Quote: paul3390
          Not to consider as such parasites and loafers from the social camp?

          Figures in the studio!
          By the way, the Chinese freeloaders from the socialist camp still supply us with almost all the goods of everyday demand.
          1. -1
            20 July 2020 11: 00
            And what - did your UN help you a lot? Figures - look for yourself, if you haven't banned it in Yandex, you have no servants here, the data is well known. About China - generally crazy nonsense.
          2. +1
            20 July 2020 11: 03
            What are you explaining to him ... It's useless. He says: "Well, you will teach me more here .. "
            Trolls, regardless of your opinion, will generate fakes.
            1. +1
              20 July 2020 15: 57
              Yes, I understand.
              1. 0
                22 July 2020 11: 14
                no, he's not a troll. the person simply does not understand the consequences of such a position. Not in terms of personal consequences, but in general ... for the population, for the state. And this suggests that somewhere for some reason and somehow this person was hammered into the head that we lost. This is already important. questions to counterintelligence))))
                1. 0
                  22 July 2020 17: 47
                  Quote: silver_roman
                  no, he's not a troll. the person simply does not understand the consequences of such a position.

                  It doesn't matter if he is a troll or a hybrid of a woodpecker and a rabbit.
                  Quote: silver_roman
                  And this suggests that somewhere for some reason and somehow this person was hammered into the head that we lost. This is already important. questions to counterintelligence))))

                  If something was hammered into his head, then it is to the doctor, and not to the counterintelligence what
                  Quote: silver_roman
                  the person simply does not understand the consequences of such a position. Not in terms of personal consequences, but in general ... for the population, for the state.

                  Yes, the usual position of ignorant and young victims of exam. What are the consequences for the population?
                  1. 0
                    23 July 2020 10: 23
                    Quote: bot.su
                    What are the consequences for the population?

                    then such a million on the red square gathers under the cameras of CNN and NYTimes and a revolution occurs, tk. do you see human rights being violated. I do not want to offend anyone, but you will not scold the sheep for running away from the camp. The shepherd is to blame for this. So, first of all, the questions are to the authorities and their levers of struggle against such a disa.
                    1. 0
                      24 July 2020 12: 45
                      Quote: silver_roman
                      going under the cameras of CNN and NYTimes and a revolution occurs

                      Now this is for counterintelligence.

                      Quote: silver_roman
                      but you will not scold the sheep for running away from the camp.

                      You have an original opinion about Russia and its people ... I wonder if you consider yourself a sheep voluntarily left in the camp or a shepherd? Or are you a wolf from a nearby forest?
                      1. 0
                        26 July 2020 22: 56
                        There are no wolves here as well as shepherds. we are all "sheep" here. and this is not an opinion about Russia and its people, of which I am a part. this is an opinion about society as a whole. further I see no ground for discussion hi
    5. +1
      20 July 2020 11: 29
      It is difficult to answer, on the one hand, the United States really planned and won all world wars, which is great for them, and on the other hand, this is not the United States, but part of it - the elite of that time. Now the elite has grown and unleashes many wars all the way up to the genetic ones. Everything is fine with this elite. But the largest and independent country cannot do this, and only the kutso fights off with a decrease in territory, if you count from the Etruscans, the founders of Rome, and the Slavs who lived up to the Atlantic. Time to wake up
    6. 0
      20 July 2020 11: 35
      There is no need to teach Trump what and how he should say: he knows his target audience better. Let him win the elections in November and then declare his personal "two wonderful" victories in world wars.
    7. 0
      21 July 2020 15: 46
      Trump is more and more talking "wonderful" nonsense!

      What makes you think that this is nonsense ?! For America, these wars were really great, they destroyed their competitors and enriched America itself fantastically. So no nonsense, just blabbed.
  2. +7
    19 July 2020 20: 54
    We won two world wars. In two world wars. In two beautiful world wars.


    The time will come when they will understand that they did not win any wars, but only engaged and are engaged in racket ...
    1. +4
      19 July 2020 21: 15
      Normal is this method, the praise of their country.
      So then they really participated in one world war, slightly ... in another they took part more seriously.
      In general, historically confirmed facts .... No one will go into details, their voters certainly. What is the most important thing for a candidate for a central post.
    2. +2
      20 July 2020 15: 00
      It is high time to understand that for the United States, "winning" does not mean winning the war, but winning from the war. Wars are not fought on the territory of the United States and have never been fought. We can only hope that they themselves have a mustache.
  3. +15
    19 July 2020 20: 57
    From a global perspective, yes, we won. Not weapons, no ... money. "The Great Gatsby" - this is the same description of the "golden age" of America after the 1st World War, when it literally "burst" from money and orders, until it flew at full gallop into the "Great Depression" ... after which another world fire, provoked Japan and roused Hitler. Then they turned up for a nodding analysis, having managed to grab a decent part of Europe (and at the same time the colonies of almost all allies wassat
  4. +1
    19 July 2020 20: 59
    Trump named two world wars "Wonderful".

    A masterpiece phrase! Speaks about the "developed" intelligence of the US president. laughing fool
  5. +5
    19 July 2020 21: 01
    Jane Psaki promised to send the fleet to the shores of Belarus. What is there to be surprised at? By the way, the Yankees called World War II "Good woo", a good war.
    1. +9
      19 July 2020 22: 12
      Let's not talk about Psaki in a negative context!
      He was the coolest, at the same time cute representative, the herald in that bastard chicken coop.
  6. +4
    19 July 2020 21: 01
    Joe and Donald, although candidates from two conflicting US parties, but judging by their separate statements, it is time for them to lie down in neighboring bunks in ward No. 6.
    For rehabilitation. Their neurons are tired. Age.
  7. 0
    19 July 2020 21: 16
    What is Trump using? Let’s say I like beer. But it really crushes! I envy ...
  8. +3
    19 July 2020 21: 19
    Trump has been pressed for 4 years in a row, absolutely all the major US media and the American elite. No other president has been bullied, neither in the United States, nor even in Russia.

    Given everything that has piled on him, he still stands, and this is respected. In the newspapers, Trump is killed, on the Internet, his portraits are burned on the street, crowds of his haters rush to the White House.
    It's easy to laugh at him, but now Donald Trump, the most demonized man on the planet and in his own country, half of the citizens just hate him.
    As stupid as he may seem, Trump did not deserve such a fate. He is a patriot of the USA, he is the living spirit of that America that was once that pulled the most desperate ingenious thirsters to discover new lands, a new Country.

    Trump won the toughest presidential election in US history, when no one believed in him. Only the Americans themselves, they chose him, and they will do it again.
    1. +6
      19 July 2020 21: 22
      With the most demonized, you got excited. Trump is in second place.
      1. +3
        19 July 2020 21: 33
        He is in 1st place, in the NYT every day there is another article about bad Trump. He’s being persecuted in his own country, at the level of the US Congress. The same Nancy Pelosi, 3 people in the country.

        It's as if Volodin hated Putin. Completely different things
  9. +6
    19 July 2020 21: 24
    We won two world wars. In two world wars. In two beautiful world wars

    Well yes. For whom the war, and for whom - the mother is dear. And beautiful.
  10. +1
    19 July 2020 21: 25
    If there is Biden after Trvmp, we will not hear it yet. The degradation of presidents is on the face. The Americans, with a perseverance worthy of praise, are stepping on the same rake that, in their words, the "Kremlin elders" were advancing. Now not only we, but the Americans themselves begin to laugh at their "gen.sek". Doesn't it remind you of anything?
  11. -2
    19 July 2020 21: 26
    Moralists aside, Trump is right. Wars have shown the backwardness of the old empires.
    Wars have shown who, alone in the world, is capable of projecting themselves onto other continents.

    The United States was and is the most effective mechanism, briefly surpassing the rest of the country. You can not love America, you can hate, but this world today is American, and everything modern that is in it, the very foundations of the world, were created by the Americans.
  12. +6
    19 July 2020 21: 27
    What's wrong? The United States has become one of the main beneficiaries of both world wars. They actually established themselves as a superpower as a result of these wars.
  13. +1
    19 July 2020 21: 34
    Quote: cniza
    We won two world wars. In two world wars. In two beautiful world wars.


    The time will come when they will understand that they did not win any wars, but only engaged and are engaged in racket ...

    Do not understand laughing In their history books all Americans won wars fool
  14. +2
    19 July 2020 22: 02
    The reservation is simple, I remembered how his FSA was always enriched at the expense of these wars, for them they were just wonderful.
  15. +1
    19 July 2020 22: 10
    It seems to me that from president to president in the United States there is a clear destruction of personality.
  16. 0
    19 July 2020 22: 12
    A clown he is a clown! It feels like they are starting to rule the world! Clownery, in a word.
  17. +8
    19 July 2020 22: 17
    What was said in the original? Not a supporter of conspiracy theories, but the phrase could sound like this - "We won two world wars, two great world war ..". In fact - "We won two world wars, two great world wars."
    Although the adjective "great", in the fight unleashed by the Democrats against Trump, can be interpreted as such - excellent, wonderful, wonderful, magnificent, cool, excellent, wonderful.
    Connoisseurs of American, not British (English) can watch the interview and offer us their version!
    1. +7
      19 July 2020 22: 54
      Trump Says America Won 'Beautiful' World Wars in Chris Wallace Interview
      Precisely beautiful - and said so

      https://www.google.ru/amp/s/heavy.com/news/2020/07/trump-chris-wallace-world-wars/amp/
      1. +2
        19 July 2020 23: 01
        Quote: Krasnodar
        Trump Says America Won 'Beautiful' World Wars in Chris Wallace Interview
        Precisely beautiful - and said so

        Thanks! All points above the "and" are placed. Durbetsalo, in a word.
        1. -1
          20 July 2020 12: 26
          You are wrong, Vladimir! For the States it’s beautiful.
  18. 0
    19 July 2020 22: 26
    In 90 years, there was a transmission of Mochi on MTV channel. This is when plasticine celebrities sorted out among themselves. They closed all the stories. After 30 years they could open it again, it would be at the top of hit parades. For 30 years they’ve talked so much, you won’t recite it!
  19. -1
    19 July 2020 23: 01
    Trump’s, Biden’s head isn’t all right, Obama is still there, but if you look at Bush Jr., there’s also a clinic, and if you remember Clintonsha, McCain, Pelosi, Maxine Waters, and many other US political figures of time, then the debilitation and degradation of the American elite in the face
    1. -1
      20 July 2020 12: 25
      No, Maxim!
      Trump said everything right. After two world events, the United States became the leader of the West. Excellent result with a minimum of fatalities on the fronts. This is what he called wonderful victories.
  20. 0
    19 July 2020 23: 04
    Well, of course they fought alone and not as part of a coalition. Moreover, in the United States. More precisely one fort.
  21. 0
    19 July 2020 23: 07
    Trump is a mega diplomat and a mega historian. He doesn’t want to remember our participation, at least he remembered the participation of the Britons. And in World War I and the French.
  22. 0
    19 July 2020 23: 16
    "The United States will overcome these difficulties and" win, as it did before, as it has always done. "
    Fuck the whole world and will sit out overseas
  23. 0
    20 July 2020 00: 06
    all this suggests that the president of the usa is a rather ordinary position. the true owners of the game will always be in the shadows and their names, if they are heard, are extremely rare.
  24. 0
    20 July 2020 02: 33
    Freudian slip of the tongue or ours translated it like that?
    Well, yes, they were victors in two world wars.
  25. +1
    20 July 2020 02: 50
    Trump called the two world wars "beautiful."
    Sheer nonsense. Such a statement can somehow be understood from the insane. However, such pearls of Trump more and more reliably indicate that this pretzel is a constant patient of ward No. 6, and not the president of the state. negative
  26. -2
    20 July 2020 04: 03
    Brave claim. Especially considering that their only accomplishments are nibbling on the Kriegsmarine, along with shaves, and fertilizing the beaches of Omaha Beach.
  27. 0
    20 July 2020 05: 07
    Who is strong in English, in the American version, please translate in the original!
    1. +1
      20 July 2020 12: 12
      We won two World Wars, two World Wars, beautiful World Wars that were vicious and horrible
      We won two world wars, two world wars, two wonderful world wars that were cruel and terrible.
      1. 0
        20 July 2020 12: 19
        Thank you very much!
  28. +1
    20 July 2020 05: 27
    It may seem, but Zhirinovsky is clearly more adequate than Trump. laughing
  29. 0
    20 July 2020 07: 10
    For the general development of Trump's thinking, it is necessary to unleash such a powerful and wonderful civil war in the states, with the participation of his family members, then he will say for sure whether this is wonderful or not. I am amazed at his stupidity.
  30. +1
    20 July 2020 08: 59
    Something that vaguely reminds me of ...

    Muaynkuampf? laughing
    1. -1
      20 July 2020 12: 21
      Hitler against the backdrop of the Anglo-Saxon elite is just a whipping boy.
  31. -1
    20 July 2020 09: 23
    A charming epidemic of covid, beautifully mowing down our super duper country USA. Let's make America great again. Well.
  32. +1
    20 July 2020 09: 41
    Trump called the two world wars "wonderful", apparently because of the "wonderful" profits America "earned" from these wars.
  33. 0
    20 July 2020 10: 45
    "We won two world wars. Two world wars, Karl!" - that's how it should have been.
  34. -1
    20 July 2020 12: 17
    The entire top of the Anglo-Saxon world is clearly screwed up. They will ruin our world.
    Although for them, or rather, for the States, they are really wonderful - after all, they escaped from a secondary country due to the death of many tens of millions of people to become leaders of the Western world.
  35. 0
    20 July 2020 13: 24
    Guys he is just blonde
  36. 0
    20 July 2020 14: 09
    And in 22 space wars ...
  37. 0
    22 July 2020 16: 23
    The USSR won with the suffering and blood of its people, and the USA won the Jackpot!