Atomic torpedo and multipurpose submarines. 671 project

23
In the United States of America 26 in May 1958, at the shipyard Electric Boat (General Dynamic company) in the city of Groton (Connecticut), laid the world's first specialized anti-submarine SSN-597 "Tallibi", optimized to combat missile submarines of the USSR. In build naval fleet It entered the United States on November 9, 1960. In the years 1962-1967, 14 more powerful and advanced "underwater hunters" "Thresher" were accepted into the US Navy. These single-hull single-shaft submarines having a displacement of 3750/4470 tons developed an underwater speed of about 30 knots, and the maximum depth of immersion was up to 250 meters. Distinctive features of the “killers” (as the American sailors called anti-submarine nuclear submarines) were super-powerful sonar equipment, relatively low noise and relatively moderate torpedo weapons (but quite sufficient to solve problems against submarines), consisting of 4 533 torpedo tubes mm placed in the middle of the vessel at an angle to the diametrical plane.

USS Tullibee (SSN-597) is a US Navy submarine, the smallest of US nuclear submarines (length 83,2 m, displacement 2300 t). Named in honor of tallibi, a freshwater fish from the salmon-like order that lives in central and northern North America. Initially, the crew of the boat was 7 officers and 60 sailors, by the time of the withdrawal from the fleet he reached 13 officers and 100 sailors.

If domestic torpedo submarines of the first generation (project 627, 627А and 645) were built to destroy enemy surface ships, then in 2 half of 1950 it became obvious that the USSR needed atomic submarines with an "anti-submarine" that can destroy missile submarine "potential enemy" in the position of probable use weapons, to ensure the deployment of its SSBNs (by countering surface and submarine forces that operate on anti-submarine lines) and to protect transports and ships from enemy submarines. Of course, the traditional for torpedo submarines did not remove the task of destroying surface ships of the enemy (mainly aircraft carriers), the implementation of mine settings, actions on communications, and the like.

Work on the study of the appearance of second-generation nuclear submarines in the USSR began in the late 1950-s. In accordance with the Government Decree 28 August 1958, the development of a unified steam generating plant began for new nuclear-powered ships. At about the same time, a second-generation submarine design competition was announced, in which leading design teams specializing in submarine shipbuilding - TsKB-18, SKB-112 Sudoproekt and SKB-143 participated. The greatest of those. Leningrad SKB-143 had a backlog, which, based on its own earlier initiative studies (1956-1958 years), carried out under the direction of Petrov, prepared those. proposal for missile (project 639) and torpedo (project 671) boats.

Distinctive features of these projects were improved hydrodynamics, which was worked out with the involvement of specialists from the TsAGI Moscow branch, the use of three-phase alternating current, single-shaft layout and increased diameter of the robust hull, providing 2's new, compact nuclear reactors that are unified for second generation nuclear ships. .

According to the results of the competition, SKB-143 was assigned the task of designing a torpedo submarine of the 671 project (the “Ruff” code) with a normal displacement of 2 thousand tons and a working depth of immersion to 300 meters. A distinctive feature of the new nuclear-powered submarine was to become high-power hydro-acoustics (for the first time, GAS parameters were specifically specified in the competition conditions).

If the first generation nuclear powered ships used the electric system of direct current (it was quite logical for diesel-electric submarines, where batteries were the main source of energy while moving submerged), then the second generation NPS decided to switch to three-phase alternating current. 3 November 1959 of the year was approved by the TTZ for a new nuclear-powered icebreaker, in March 1960 of the year they completed a preliminary design, and in December - a technical one.



The nuclear submarine of the 671 project was created under the direction of the chief designer Chernyshev (he had previously participated in the creation of boats of the 617, 627, 639 and 645 projects). Based on the fact that the main purpose of the new submarine was the destruction of American SSBNs in combat patrol areas of these vessels (that is, not under the ice of the Arctic, but on "clean water"), the customer, under pressure from the developer, refused the requirement to ensure surface flooding during any of the submarine compartments.

On the new submarine, as on nuclear-powered first generation, they decided to use a two-reactor power plant, which fully met the reliability requirements. They created a compact steam generating plant with high specific indices, which almost doubled the corresponding parameters of previous power plants.

The Commander-in-Chief of the Navy Gorshkov, "as an exception," agreed to use one propeller shaft on the 671-project submarine. This allowed to reduce noise and displacement. The transition to a single-channel scheme provided obtaining higher, underwater speeds, as compared with foreign analogues.

The use of a single-shaft scheme made it possible to place in the same compartment a turbo-gear unit, both autonomous turbo-generators and all related equipment. This ensured a reduction in the relative length of the submarine hull. The so-called Admiralty coefficient, which characterized the efficiency of using the power of the ship’s propulsion system, was approximately twice as high as that of the 627 nuclear-powered icebreaker and actually became equal to that of the American submarine Skipjack. To create a durable case, it was decided to use AK-29 steel. This allowed to increase the maximum depth of immersion.

In contrast to the first generation nuclear submarines, it was decided to equip the new ship with autonomous turbo-generators (and not hung on the main turbo-gear unit), which increased the reliability of the electric power system.

Torpedo tubes, according to the initial design studies, were planned to be shifted to the center of the vessel, as on American Trescher nuclear submarines, placing them at an angle to the center plane of the nuclear-powered ship. However, it later emerged that with this arrangement, the speed of the submarine at the time of torpedo fire should not exceed 11 nodes (this was unacceptable for tactical reasons: unlike the Thresher-type submarines of American production, the Soviet submarine was designed to destroy not only submarines, but also large surface ships of the enemy). In addition, when using the "American" layout seriously complicated work on loading torpedoes, and the replenishment of ammunition in the sea became completely impossible. As a result, torpedo tubes were installed above the GAS antenna in the fore part of the 671 submarine.

In 1960, the Leningrad Admiralteysky Plant began preparations for the construction of a series of new torpedo submarines. The act of accepting the 671 project headboard K-38 into the Soviet Navy (the submarine received the 600 serial number) was signed on November 5 by the head of the government commission Hero of the Soviet Union Schedrin. In Leningrad, 1967 nuclear powered ships of this type were produced. Three submarines (K-14, -314 and -454) completed the modified project. The main difference between these ships was to equip not only with traditional torpedoes, but also with the Vyuga rocket-torpedo complex, which the 469 of August 4 of the year adopted. Rocket-torpedo ensured the destruction of coastal, surface and submarine targets at ranges from 1969 to 10 thousand m nuclear charge. Standard 40 mm torpedo tubes from depths up to 533 meters were used for launch.

Atomic torpedo and multipurpose submarines. 671 project
Construction of PLA K-314 on LAO (order 610). Fencing felling is under the "tent". 1972


Before descending, the PLN Ave.671 is disguised as a surface ship.


The enemy should by no means know that nuclear submarines are being built in Leningrad. And therefore - the most thorough disguise!


Production of the 671 submarine of the project: K-38 was laid 12.04.63, launched 28.07.66 and entered into operation 05.11.67; K-369 was laid by 31.01.64, 22.12.67 was launched and 06.11.68 was commissioned; K-147 was laid 16.09.64, launched 17.06.68, entered into operation 25.12.68; K-53 was laid 16.12.64, launched 15.03.69, entered into operation 30.09.69; K-306 was laid 20.03.68, launched 04.06.69, entered into operation 04.12.69; K-323 "50 years of the USSR" was laid 05.07.68, launched 14.03.70, entered into operation 29.10.70; K-370 was laid 19.04.69, launched 26.06.70, entered into operation 04.12.70; K-438 was laid 13.06.69, launched 23.03.71, entered into operation 15.10.71; K-367 was laid 14.04.70, launched 02.07.71, entered into operation 05.12.71; K-314 was laid 05.09.70, launched 28.03.72, entered into operation 06.11.72; K-398 was laid 22.04.71, launched 02.08.72, entered into operation 15.12.72; K-454 was laid 16.08.72, launched 05.05.73, entered into operation 30.09.73; K-462 was laid 03.07.72, launched 01.09.73, entered into operation 30.12.73; K-469 was laid 05.09.73, launched 10.06.74, entered into operation 30.09.74; K-481 was laid 27.09.73, launched 08.09.74, entered into operation 27.12.74.

The double-hull submarine with the characteristic “limousine” fence of the withdrawable devices had a robust body made of high-strength sheet steel AK-29 35 millimeters thick. Internal flat bulkheads must withstand pressures up to 10 kgf / cm2. The hull of the submarine was divided into 7 waterproof compartments:
The first - battery, torpedo and residential;
The second - provisional and auxiliary mechanisms, the central post;
The third - reactor;
Fourth - turbine (autonomous turbine units were placed in it);
The fifth, electrical, served to house auxiliary mechanisms (the sanblock was in it);
Sixth - diesel generator, residential;
The seventh is the helmsman (the galley and the rowing motors are located here).

The design of the light body, horizontal and vertical tail, the nose of the superstructure was made of low-magnetic steel. The fencing of the sliding devices, the aft and middle parts of the superstructure were made of aluminum alloy, and the rudders and large-sized radomes of the GAK antenna were made of titanium alloys. For the submarine 671-th project (as well as further modifications of the submarine) was characterized by careful decoration of the outer hull contours.

The ballast tanks had a Kingston (and not a scupper, as on previous Soviet submarines of post-war projects) design.

The ship was equipped with air purification and air conditioning systems, fluorescent lighting, and a more comfortable (compared to the first generation nuclear submarines) layout of cockpits and cabins, modern sanitary facilities.

PLA pr.NUMX in the flooded transport dock. Leningrad, 671


PLA output pr.NUMX from TPD-671 (pr.4) in the North


Head PLA pr.671 K-38 in the sea


The main power plant of the nuclear submarine 671 of the project (nominal power was 31 thousand hp) included two steam-generating units OK-300 (thermal power of the VM-4 water reactor was 72 mW and 4 of the PG-4 steam generator), for each side autonomous . The reactor core recharge cycle is eight years.

Compared to first-generation reactors, the layout of second-generation nuclear power plants has changed significantly. The reactor has become more "dense" and compact. They implemented the “pipe in pipe” scheme and made “hanging” on the steam generators of the primary circuit pumps. The number of large-diameter pipelines that connected the main elements of the installation (volume compensators, primary circuit filter, etc.) was reduced. Almost all the pipelines of the primary circuit (large and small diameter) were placed in uninhabited premises and closed with biological protection. The instrumentation and automation systems of a nuclear power plant have changed significantly. The number of remote controlled valves (valves, valves, dampers, etc.) has increased.

The steam turbine unit consisted of the main turbo-gear unit GTZA-615 and two autonomous turbine generators OK-2 (the latter ensured the generation of alternating current 50 Hz, 380 B, included a turbine and a generator whose power was 2 thousand kW).

The reserve means of movement were two electric motors of direct current PG-137 (each with a power 275 hp). Each motor was driven into rotation a two-bladed propeller having a small diameter. There were two batteries and two diesel generators (400 V, 50 Hz, 200 kW). All main devices and mechanisms had remote and automated control.

When designing the submarine 671-th project some attention was paid to reducing the noise of the vessel. In particular, a hydroacoustic rubber coating was used for a lightweight body, the number of scuppers decreased. Acoustic visibility submarines compared with the first generation of vessels decreased by about five times.

The submarine was equipped with the Sigma all-latitude complex, the MT-70 television monitoring system for the ice and the general environment, which, under favorable conditions, was capable of providing species information at depths up to 50 meters.

But the main information tool of the vessel was the sonar complex MGK-300 "Rubin", developed by the Central Research Institute "Morphyspribor" (head - chief designer NN Sviridov). The maximum target detection range is about 50-60 thousand meters. It consisted of a nasal low-frequency sonar emitter, a high-frequency antenna of the MG-509 “Radian” sonar mine detection system, located in the front part of the fence of sliding devices, sonar alarms, underwater communication stations, and other elements. "Ruby" provided a circular view, distance measurement using the echolocation method, independent automatic determination of the course angles of the target and its tracking, as well as the detection of enemy hydroacoustic active assets.



Fragments of PLA K-38 - head pr.671


After 76, during the modernization, on most submarines of the 671GAK “Rubin” project, the more sophisticated Rubicon complex with an infrasonic radiator with a maximum detection range of more than 200 KM was replaced with some modern MG-509. -519.

Retractable devices - periscope ПЗНС-10, radio recognition system antenna MRP-10, having a transponder, the Albatross radar complex, the Veil direction finder, the Willow and Anis radio communication antennas or VAN-M, as well as the control panel. There were sockets for removable antennas, which were installed in the course of solving specific problems.

On board the submarine installed navigation system, which provided the number of paths and course guidance.

The armament of the ship - six torpedo tubes of caliber 533 mm, providing shooting at a depth of 250 meters.

The torpedo complex was located in the upper third of the first compartment. Torpedo tubes were placed horizontally in two rows. In the median plane of the submarine, above the first row of torpedo tubes, there was a torpedo loading hatch. Everything happened remotely: the torpedoes were placed in the compartment, moved along it, loaded into vehicles, lowered with the help of hydraulic drives on the racks.

The torpedo shooting control was provided by the Brest-671 ITU.

The ammunition consisted of 18 mines and torpedoes (53-65k, SET-65, PMR-1, TEST-71, P-1). Download options were chosen depending on the problem to be solved. The setting of mines could be performed at speeds up to 6 nodes.

Technical characteristics of the nuclear submarine project 671:
Maximum length - 92,5 m;
Width is greatest - 10,6 m;
Normal displacement - 4250 m3;
Full displacement - 6085 m3;
Reserve buoyancy - 32,1%
Extreme depth of immersion - 400 m;
Immersion depth - 320 m;
Maximum submerged speed - 33,5 nodes;
Surface speed - 11,5 nodes;
Autonomy - 60 days;
Crew - 76 man.





The Soviet submarine compared to the most modern US analogue - the Sturge SSN 637 nuclear submarine (3 March 1967, the lead ship of the series entered operation) had a great submarine speed (American - 29, Soviet - 33,5 node), comparable ammunition and great depth . At the same time, the American nuclear submarine had less noise and had more advanced sonar equipment that provided better search capabilities. Soviet submariners believed that "if the detection range of an American boat is 100 km, then ours is only 10." Probably, this statement was exaggerated, but the problems of stealth, as well as increasing the range of detection of enemy ships on submarines of the 671 project, were not fully resolved.

The K-38 — the lead ship of the 671 project — was incorporated into the Northern Fleet. The first commander of the submarine was the captain of the second rank Chernov. During the tests, the new submarine developed the maximum short-term submarine speed - 34,5 knots., Thus becoming the fastest submarine in the world (for that time). Before 74, the Northern Fleet also received 11 of the same type nuclear-powered ships, which were initially based in West Face Bay. From 81 to 83, they were relocated to Gremikha. In the West, these vessels received the code name Victor (later - Victor-1).

Very photogenic, elegant “Victorians” had a rather eventful biography. These submarines were found in almost all oceans and seas, where the Soviet fleet carried out combat service. At the same time nuclear submarines demonstrated rather high combat and search capabilities. For example, in the Mediterranean “autonomy” lasted not 60 days, but almost 90. There is a case when the navigator K-367 in the journal made the following entry: “they determined the place of the vessel by the return of the anchor on the aircraft carrier Nimitz, which was moored in the port of Naples. At the same time, the nuclear submarine did not enter the Italian territorial waters, however, it monitored the US Navy ship. ”

In 79, at the next aggravation of the American-Soviet relations, the nuclear submarines K-481 and K-38 carried out combat service in the Persian Gulf. At the same time, about the 50 ships of the US Navy were located. The conditions for swimming were extremely difficult (at the surface the water temperature reached 40 °). The participant of the campaign Shportko (commander of K-481) in his memoirs wrote that in the power compartments of the ships the air was heated to 70 grauses, and in the residential ones - to 50. Air conditioners had to work at full capacity, but the equipment (which was designed for use in northern latitudes) could not cope: the refrigeration units started to function normally only at a depth of 60 meters, where the water temperature was about 15 degrees.

Each boat had two interchangeable crews, which were located at the Berezina floating base, which was stationed near Socotra Island or in the Gulf of Aden. The duration of the hike was about six months and in general, it was very successful. A.N. Shortyko believed that the Soviet nuclear submarines in the Persian Gulf acted quite secretly: if the American naval forces were able to quickly detect Soviet vessels, then they could not properly classify them and organize prosecution. Subsequently, the intelligence data confirmed these findings. At the same time, tracking the US Navy ships was carried out at a range of missile-torpedo and rocket weapons: upon receipt of the appropriate order, they would be sent to the bottom with almost 100% probability.

K-38 and K-323 submarines in September-October 71 of the year made an ice-free autonomous campaign in the Arctic. In January, 74 began a unique transition from the Northern to the Pacific Fleet (lasting 107 days) of two nuclear powered ships of the 670 and 671 projects under the command of captains of the second rank Haitarov and Gontarev. The route passed through the Atlantic, Indian, Pacific Oceans. After the ships passed the Faro-Icelandic anti-submarine line, they moved in a tactical group (one ship at a depth of 150 meters, the other - 100 meters). This was actually the first experience of such a long-term pursuit of nuclear submarines as part of a tactical group.

Submarines 10-25 March made an entry into the Somali port of Berbera, where the crews of the ships received a short rest. March 29, during combat service, the submarine had short-term contact with the US anti-submarine anti-submarine ships. It was possible to break away from them, having gone to a considerable depth. After the end of combat service in a given area of ​​the Indian Ocean, on April 13, the submarines headed to the Strait of Malacca, leading by the support ship Bashkiria, on the surface.

The temperature of the outboard water during the transition reached 28 degrees. Air conditioning systems with the maintenance of the necessary microclimate could not cope: in the boat compartments, the air temperature rose to 70 degrees with a relative humidity of 90%. Behind a detachment of Soviet ships carried out almost continuous tracking of the base patrol aircraft Lockheed R-3 "Orion" of the US Navy, which were based on the atoll Diego Garcia.

The American “guardianship” in the Strait of Malacca (ships entered the 17 Strait of April) became more dense: a large number of anti-submarine helicopters joined the patrol aircraft. On board the 671 submarine of the 20 project in April, one of the Rubin GAS nodes caught fire. The reason was the increased humidity. But the fire efforts of the crew quickly eliminated. On April 25, the ships passed the pouring zone, and went into deep water, looking up from observation. On May 6, the nuclear ship Gontareva entered Avacha Bay. The second icebreaker joined her the next day.

In January, the 76 of the strategic missile cruiser K-171, and the nuclear submarine K-469, which served as a guard, made the transition from the North to the Pacific Fleet. Ships across the Atlantic went to 18 cable removal. Drake Strait was covered at various depths. Constant communication was maintained by the RFP. After crossing the equator, the vessels diverged and in March arrived in Kamchatka, each passed its own route. For 80 days, the submarines passed 21754 miles, while the K-469 for the entire transition only once rose to the periscope depth (in the Antarctic region).

PLA K-147 av.671

PLA K-147 pr.671, upgraded in 1984, with the installation of a wake wake detection system (SOX). In 1985, with this system, the boat led the American SSBN for 6 days

PLA K-306 pr.671, faced in a submerged position with the American PLA. Polar, water area of ​​SRH-10, 1975


Submarine K-147, equipped with the latest and unparalleled tracking system for nuclear submarines in the wake wake, in the period from 29 May to 1 in July 85 of the year under the command of captain second rank Nikitin participated in the exercises of the submarine of the Aport SF, during which was carried out continuous six-day tracking of the “Simon Bolivar” SSBN of the US Navy, using non-acoustic and acoustic means.

In March, the 1984 of the year with a submarine K-314 under the command of the captain of the first rank Evseenko occurred a very dramatic incident. Together with Vladivostok BOD, tracking the strike force of the US Navy as part of the aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk and 7 escort ships that maneuvered in the Sea of ​​Japan, 21 in March, a Soviet submarine, ascent to clarify the surface situation, proportional to the bottom of the aircraft carrier throughout 40 meters . As a result, the maneuvers of the US Navy were curtailed and the Kitty Hawk, losing fuel oil through the hole, went to the Japanese dock. At the same time, the Soviet nuclear-powered vessel, which had lost its propeller, proceeded in tow to Chazhma Bay. It was repaired there.

In the American press, this event caused a negative response. Journalists who specialized in naval issues noted the weakness of AUG security. It is this that allowed the “potential enemy” submarines to surface directly below the keel of an aircraft carrier. 14 March 89 th year wrote off the first boat of the project 671 - K-314, which was part of the TF. In 93-96, the rest of the submarines of this type left the fleet combat. However, the utilization of ships was delayed. To date, most courts are in sludge, waiting for their fate for years.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. patriot2
    +3
    6 August 2012 08: 40
    What a beauty! We are able to design and build nuclear submarines.
    1. 755962
      0
      7 August 2012 02: 52
      Well, if you would like one to the museum ..... dreams, dreams ... Our history of the Navy and the history of nuclear submarine shipbuilding may remain in the pictures. A pity.
  2. The Armed Forces
    +3
    6 August 2012 08: 43
    Good boat for its time
  3. +1
    6 August 2012 09: 27
    Very beautiful submarine, the power and grace of a predator is felt ...
  4. GG2012
    +11
    6 August 2012 09: 51
    "... On March 21, the Soviet submarine, when surfacing to clarify the surface situation, proportioned the bottom of the American aircraft carrier for 40 meters ..."

    Laughed heartily! It was necessary to surface and jump over the aircraft carrier to be noticed. "

    Bravo to Soviet submariners !!!
    1. borisst64
      +1
      6 August 2012 10: 43
      But the captain of the boat probably got the lyuley to the fullest! Aircraft carrier makes a lot of noise, you can navigate, why float under it?
      1. GG2012
        +5
        6 August 2012 10: 56
        Well, we don’t know all the details.
        I would like to believe that this was done on purpose! For example, before the boat was decommissioned, the wheelhouse was additionally strengthened, and a "special can opener" was welded on for opening cans from aircraft carriers !!!

        "... As a result, the maneuvers of the American Navy were curtailed and the Kitty Hawk, losing fuel oil through the hole, went to the Japanese dock ..."
        Maybe this is the point of the operation ?!

        And then, "... At the same time, the Soviet nuclear-powered ship, which had lost its propeller, proceeded in tow to the Chazhma Bay ..."

        It turns out the boat surfaced with a propeller up (??? !!!)

        If there are submariners on the site, please explain to me unreasonable! ...
        1. GG2012
          +6
          6 August 2012 11: 10
          It turns out this is not the first "amerikosovsky crap" !!!
          Here's another:
          http://www.agentura.ru/timeline/2000/oblet/
          Russian reconnaissance planes "open" Kitty Hawk
          Russian military aircraft in the Sea of ​​Japan successfully carried out an operation to overcome the air defenses of the American multipurpose aircraft carrier strike group led by the aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk (KittyHawkCV63). Information about this, published by the Izvestia newspaper, was confirmed to Interfax on Tuesday by informed sources in the Russian military department. According to them, this happened twice in the Sea of ​​Japan at a time when the US aircraft carrier group was heading for exercises in the Korea Strait (October 17) and when it was returning from maneuvers (November 9) ... (Interfax November 14, 2000)
          According to some reports, the planes were from 11 air forces (commander - Lieutenant General Anatoly Nagovnitsyn). The deck of Kitty Hawk was completely unprepared for opposition and the Americans seriously decided that they would be attacked, and began to cut off the fuel lines in a panic so that there would not be a big explosion and fire during the attack. Then they raised the Hornets and tried to accompany the "drying" to the coast.
          On the same day, Anatoly Kornukov said that "The leadership of the General Staff of the Armed Forces highly appreciated the work of the Russian pilots who opened the air defense system of the US aircraft carrier strike force led by the Kitte Hawk aircraft carrier. According to him, all pilots will be nominated for awards." It was planned reconnaissance, although in the course of it unusual tasks were solved. The results of this reconnaissance are impressive, "the commander-in-chief stressed.
          Source:
          On December 7, in Washington, US military officials Kenent Bacon and Admiral Stephen Pietropaoli held a press conference that revealed some details of a series of incidents in the Sea of ​​Japan when Russian Su-27 and Su-24 reconnaissance aircraft flew a critical distance to the base there American aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk.
          As Bacon said on Thursday, some time later an email came to the aircraft carrier containing two photos of Kitty Hawk deck taken from Russian aircraft during one of such actions of the Russian Air Force. The letter also contained a short message in Russian, the content of which Amiral Pietropaoli refused to clarify, (here I thoroughly neighing !!! it’s clear to the hedgehog what is written there !!!) reports UPI. According to him, the letter was not sent from the Russian Ministry of Defense, and the sender to his Pentagon representative is unknown.
          In addition, Kenneth Bacon said that at a press conference a week ago, when he also spoke about the actions of the Russian pilots, he made a number of inaccuracies. Firstly, there were not two cases of overflight of Russian aircraft, but three - on October 12, October 17 and November 9. Second, during the October 17 incident, the planes were not “spotted at an acceptable distance” a few hundred meters from the ship, as previously reported by the Russian Air Force, but flew directly over the aircraft carrier, which left the US military in disarray. At this point, the pictures were taken, which were subsequently sent to Kitty Hawk.
          Source:
           Lenta.ru 8.12.00
          The Russian military reinforced the president’s initiative with a weighty argument
          Evgeny Krutikov (News on 14.11.00/XNUMX/XNUMX)
          On the eve of President Vladimir Putin's visit to Mongolia, Russian pilots repeated the feat of their predecessors - in the Sea of ​​Japan a pair of Russian reconnaissance aircraft "opened" (that is, unimpeded through detection and security systems) an American aircraft carrier group and photographed the deck of the Kitty Hawk aircraft carrier.
          The special operation was carried out jointly by the reconnaissance of the Far Eastern Air Force and Air Defense Association and the Pacific Fleet. Its essence is as follows: two Russian reconnaissance aircraft found in the Sea of ​​Japan an American carrier-based multipurpose strike group led by Kitty Hawk (this is not easy in itself, the most important thing at sea is to find out the exact location of the enemy) and then were able to pass unnoticed through the air defense locators Americans and flew directly over Kitty Hawk. There is nothing more terrible - if these were combat aircraft, then the aircraft carrier would be guaranteed to be sunk. "Kitty Hawk" until November 17 will continue to participate in exercises in the Sea of ​​Japan together with 15 Japanese ships and many American ships from the 7th fleet.
          For the first and, it was believed, the last time this happened exactly 30 years ago. Then, in 1970, the Soviet Tu-16R reconnaissance aircraft also flew over an American aircraft carrier at extremely low altitude, releasing a landing gear. After that, all members of the reconnaissance crew were awarded the Order of Lenin - the military significance of this operation is so great. And all the senior officers who commanded the American aircraft carrier group were removed from their posts, and some were demoted. What will now be done with captain Allen J. Myers and wing commander Commander Douglas MasKlein is unknown.
          In Soviet times, such duels in the air were normal practice - the superpowers "tried each other for strength." Many died: the list of Soviet and American pilots who were shot down by enemy air defenses and interceptors, or who died performing super complex maneuvers in front of each other, is huge. The same applies, by the way, to submarines (how can we not recall the main official version of the sinking of the Kursk - a collision with a NATO submarine tracking it). But with the end of the Cold War, the confrontation at sea and in the air gradually began to fade. There is no practical sense in the fight against American aircraft carrier formations specially created for supremacy at sea, and this is a risky business. The reconnaissance planes could simply be shot down, the pilots would be killed, and both sides would then do everything possible to prevent information leaks.
          The General Staff of the Russian Navy categorically refuses to answer the question for what such purposes it was necessary to conduct such risky exercises right now. The headquarters in the Far East, which led the "attack" on Kitty Hawk, are also silent. Official American sources will certainly deny the incident - it is all the more not beneficial for them. It is also characteristic that in Soviet times such operations were conducted, as a rule, against the US Atlantic Fleet in the Barents and North Seas - this direction was considered the main one according to the plans of the Soviet General Staff. Now, the "show of force" was carried out precisely in the Far East against the US Pacific Fleet and the aircraft carrier group based in the Japanese port of Yokosuka. The time of the operation strangely coincided with the tour of President Putin to Mongolia and further to Brunei. Moreover, it was yesterday that the press service of the President of the Russian Federation issued a statement, which says that Vladimir Putin proposed that the US leadership lower the level of nuclear confrontation by 2008 below 1500 warheads on each side ...
          1. +7
            6 August 2012 11: 47
            Back in 1970, pilots of a Tu-16 group of bombers from the USSR Navy's Pacific Fleet were tasked with hacking the air defense of one of the American aircraft carriers in the Sea of ​​Japan at any cost. Previously, this was not possible. American fighters always took aircraft of this type under a kind of convoy long before their approach to the target. At the same time, one of the "enemy" aircraft necessarily went under the fuselage of the Tu-16, equipped with photographic equipment, making it impossible to photograph the aircraft carrier from above. And without such pictures, the task was considered unfulfilled.
            It happened that time. However, the Yankees did not expect the Russians to use military cunning. One of the Tu-16 made a maneuver, which is carried out during the approach, and went down in the direction of the take-off deck of the aircraft carrier, from which another fighter was just preparing to soar. The Soviet bomber even launched a landing gear. At the sight of this, the Americans were simply stupefied. The fighter, hanging under the belly of the Tu-16, immediately went off to the side, and panic began on the aircraft carrier.
            The fighter, already grappling with the catapult, jerked somewhere to the side and wedged tightly. The personnel serving the upper deck rushed scatteringly, looking for cover from the Russian "badger" (as classified in NATO Tu-16), ready to flop onto the aircraft carrier. Our plane slowly sailed over the giant ship, filming everything that happens below, to the fullest. The attack was successful! Although, of course, in reality, the Tu-16, having purposefully bombed it, would have been immediately destroyed by the cover aviation that was already in the air. Nevertheless, the breakthrough took place, in the same real battle, the aircraft carrier would have been damaged, making it impossible for it to perform combat missions.
            The images were examined by specialists in the Far East and in Moscow - the panic that reigned on the American aircraft carrier was clearly captured on the photo. But these pictures have not yet been made public. We still do not know the names of the pilots. It is hoped that the command of the Navy will declassify over time the information thirty years ago.
        2. +3
          6 August 2012 13: 42
          During tracking at night, the boat lost the aircraft carrier, surfaced to the periscope depth and the aircraft carrier hit the boat after it abruptly changed course. The right shaft was jammed.
          The blow was from the stern and there everything is bad with the acoustics.
          Commander A.M. Evseenko removed from command.
          1. Starcom1183
            0
            6 August 2012 17: 11
            garbage is all ... the commander carried out tracking at a periscope depth of 7 ???
          2. iegudeil
            0
            7 August 2012 03: 40
            Project 671 - single-shaft boat.
          3. 0
            23 November 2019 07: 11
            There is also such a hydrology that you hear the hell, so "2 loneliness" met, and neither the acoustics on Kitty Hawk nor on our submarine heard each other shit before the collision ...
        3. Starcom1183
          +2
          6 August 2012 17: 09
          ))) this is unlikely to be the case, most likely it is a fairy tale, but if you still assume that this was the case, then you need to take into account a couple of circumstances:
          1) a training alert is triggered before the ascent, mobilizing the staff, as it were, the surface situation is revealed, for which the ship (plane) maneuvers by looking at the aft course angles (the hook has a shadow zone in the stern), after which the boat emerges.
          2) for the commander, not just surfacing, but simply losing stealth under such circumstances is well ... ideally, not performing a combat mission, and only a state of emergency can make him do this.
          1. iegudeil
            0
            7 August 2012 03: 47
            Perhaps the boat held too close contact and did not correctly solve the problem of maneuvering. We do not know all the circumstances.
          2. +1
            8 August 2012 08: 52
            ..... It could really happen ..
            As an example, I will cite the case of the K-279 RPK CH 667b project, which in 1986 in the Norwegian Sea, when surfacing for a communication session and determining the location, rammed the RT "Kalininsk" ..... which, when viewed on noise bearing stood stupidly drowning the engines, and began to move towards the submarine when it emerged .....

            And at the ascent, the boat is blind and deaf .......
        4. iegudeil
          +1
          7 August 2012 03: 29
          For some reason, no one has ever described this event in detail anywhere. But one of the versions of the boat itself was also stuck in a hole, gave a reverse, tried to free itself, disperse, and, as a result, got caught by a screw. Nowhere is it described which part of the hull collided. Nothing is said about retractable devices either. What part of the hull can the aircraft carrier be strung at 40 meters, floating and without damaging the retractable devices.
          I think if the retractable devices were not damaged, then the boat surfaced at the intersection and hit the bottom of the aircraft carrier aft. But then the vertical steering wheel should have been damaged, and not just the screw.
          Actually, a similar case could have happened with another similar boat in the Mediterranean. AUG suspected the presence of our boat in its warrant and decided to detect it by the method of silence. The entire AUG turned off the engines and began to listen to the horizon. We listened for an hour or two. Our commander V.V. Anokhin lost patience and decided to swim under the periscope to see what was happening above. We extended the periscope and found that the boat was under the side of the aircraft carrier. Seconds were literally separated from the collision. They managed to go deep into the depths. The aircraft carrier's board was not hooked. The Amers never found the boat. If some kind of amerovsky sloven sailor stood and smoked near the side spitting, they could have detected the periscope. My classmate at the school told me about it upon arrival from the "autonomous". I don't remember the exact details of this event now. Somewhere in 1973 it was, the nuclear submarine "50 years of the USSR". I don't remember the name of the aircraft carrier.
          "Impenetrability" AUG is a myth blown up in the press.

          I would like to believe that this was done on purpose! For example, before the boat was decommissioned, the wheelhouse was additionally strengthened, and a "special can opener" was welded on for opening cans from aircraft carriers !!!


          It is you who repeat the statements of the Amerovsky command. After each incident related to the clashes, they give a message to the press that the councils specially prepare cheap disposable boats, put a crew assembled from criminals there and send their ships to amnesty for amnesty. But this is all absurd.
          In 1975, our boat (again 671 ave.) 3rd Division, when tracking the Amerov boat when they left the English base, collided under the bottom of a large tanker. Both boats tried to disguise themselves under a large vessel, but there was not enough space for two. Amerov was dragged by tugboats to the base, ours, without surfacing, returned independently with damage to the bow.
  5. patriot2
    +1
    6 August 2012 10: 20
    Some countries would like to have such an "old lady" even now (despite her performance characteristics).
  6. +5
    6 August 2012 18: 27
    "Production of nuclear submarines of Project 671: K-38 was laid down on 12.04.63/28.07.66/05.11.67, launched on 369/31.01.64/22.12.67 and commissioned on 06.11.68/147/16.09.64; K-17.06.68 was laid down on 25.12.68/53/16.12.64, launched on 15.03.69/30.09.69/306 and commissioned on 20.03.68/04.06.69. 04.12.69; K-323 was laid down on 50/05.07.68/14.03.70, launched on 29.10.70/370/19.04.69, commissioned on 26.06.70/04.12.70/438; K-13.06.69 was laid down on 23.03.71/15.10.71/367, launched on 14.04.70/02.07.71/05.12.71, entered service on 314/05.09.70/28.03.72; K- 06.11.72 was laid down on 398/22.04.71/02.08.72, launched on 15.12.72/454/16.08.72, entered service on 05.05.73/30.09.73/462; K-03.07.72 "01.09.73 years of the USSR" was laid down on 30.12.73/469/05.09.73, launched on 10.06.74/30.09.74/481, commissioned on 27.09.73/08.09.74/27.12.74; K -XNUMX was laid down on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, launched on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, entered service on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX; K-XNUMX was laid down on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, launched on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, entered service on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX; K-XNUMX was laid down XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, launched on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, commissioned on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX; K-XNUMX was laid down on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, launched on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, commissioned on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX; K-XNUMX was laid down on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, launched on XNUMX, entered service on XNUMX; K-XNUMX was laid down on XNUMX, launched into ode XNUMX, entered service on XNUMX; K-XNUMX was laid down on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, launched on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, commissioned on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX; K-XNUMX was laid down on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, launched on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, commissioned on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX; K-XNUMX was laid down on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, launched on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, commissioned on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX. "
    The number and timing of construction and commissioning is impressive. I wonder if they can do it now? They built like 34 or IL-2 in the war. Such a country is pros ... if, g-d-s!
  7. REPA1963
    0
    7 August 2012 00: 12
    I’m very interested, 40 (forty) meters of the hole and went to the dock myself !!! What hole do you need to dig to make it drown?
    1. iegudeil
      +2
      7 August 2012 03: 53
      He does not need to be drowned, it is enough to break his upper deck. Aircraft can neither rise nor land. Without aviation, it’s just an iron box.
    2. 0
      8 August 2012 08: 40
      //// Yes, and this would be enough ...... there simply exists a system of waterproof bulkheads between the compartments, which are locked either automatically or manually when there is any danger (penetration of sea water, in case of fire, etc.)
      ... And naturally a Russian scientist, Admiral S.O. Makarov, came up with such a system, who by an absurd coincidence died on the battleship "Petropavlovsk" which was blown up by a mine when leaving Port Arthur and was not yet equipped with a system of waterproof bulkheads ... ...
  8. iegudeil
    +3
    7 August 2012 07: 35
    He served on these boats in the years 72-75 under the contract, 91 crew Zaydullina D.I.
    Prior to that, he was on the 675th project - a folding bed of the 1st generation PLARK. Of course it is heaven and earth. Although the 671 project is not spacious, but still comfortable. The central post is convenient.
    Passage to the 1st compartment through the 2nd deck. In the 3rd compartment, although through the 1st deck, but on the trap behind the compartment. Passage from the hatchway to the 2nd deck one step from the hatchway. In general, the paths through the Central compartment are very conveniently untied, without interfering with the CPU. The control panel for general ship systems is a little awkward. There is almost no passage behind the operator, and sometimes you have to look at the state of the mechanisms not only to the operator.
    But the main advantage of this boat over the 1st generation is a 3-phase alternating current. Very few fires occurred on these boats.
    At direct current (1st generation), fires were a frequent occurrence.
    The boat was very responsive (quickly accelerated) and maneuvered well in underwater position (large tail unit and good streamlining of the hull). In the above-water position, in order to get a speed of 11 knots, the feed CBH was filled with water. The tail was sunk. Otherwise, the screw popped out of the water and the reactor AZ triggered.
    In the southern latitudes, the air conditioning system could not cope and the temperature in the compartments increased.
    A method of noise reduction was also used by turning off the electrochemical air regeneration and turning off the "extra" ship fans. Instead, the RDU of chemical regeneration was charged and the humidity in the compartments was increased by hanging sheets moistened with water. Thus, a satisfactory carbon dioxide content was achieved with a reduced ship noise.
    But my radar was producing a tremendous amount of ozone. The high voltage on the magnetron does not like moisture. On the other hand, the conditions of the southern latitudes make it possible to look beyond the horizon, and even at a reduced power, the Albatross station made it possible to see targets beyond its range scale almost twice.
    The Mediterranean was almost our inland sea. The boats of our Project 3 671rd Division were constantly on duty there. And 670 more "aircraft carrier killer" projects of the 11th division.

    On K-398, in the Mediterranean, we had a very unpleasant malfunction. In the turbine compartment noticed increased vaporization. For several days they searched for a steam leak, but the leak as such, the devices did not show. Incidentally, a sailor turbinist discovered the release of water in the form of an aerosol from a board outboard. At high pressure, water through a crack is very reminiscent of steam. If the boil vomited, then the hole would be the size of one square decimeter. The crack went 270 degrees along the circular weld. Fortunately, the brew has a taper and, as it were, is compressed by water pressure into the body. When immersed to great depths, the aerosol did not appear at all. We monitored the behavior of this seam, but continued to carry out their task. If the crack continued to grow, the autonomy would have to be stopped. But nothing happened, skated in full.

    It is very nice on a submarine to take a shower with seawater at great depths. Thin jets of cold water under pressure resemble jets of steam and the feeling is ambivalent. It’s impossible to understand whether it’s cold or hot. Charcot's shower is a miserable likeness. After a shower at a depth of 200-250 meters, the body becomes very active, a feeling of intoxication appears. And the appearance is like after a steam room.

    671 project has well rolled out its motor resource. There were practically no serious accidents. Enemy ships for this boat were more prey than rival. Almost without any special obstacles, all barriers were overcome and very easily avoided the chase.
    Most of these boats had a maximum speed of 34,5 knots.

    In the Mediterranean, it is difficult to get away from the aircraft of the base patrol aircraft. The water there is transparent from an airplane visually you can see the boat at depths of up to 60 meters. The sea itself is small for a nuclear submarine; there are few places to disperse. And with depths it’s not always comfortable everywhere.
    Once they ran away from "Nimrod" for almost 2 days, until, apparently, they left its patrol zone, and perhaps he himself was "skidded" in the wrong direction. The basic patrol aviation in the zones of duty maintains a continuous watch. The planes are changed once a day. There are two crews on board. On board there are both magnetometers and millimeter-wave radar that "sees" the wake of a boat going at shallow depths.

    Probably for the Mediterranean Sea the top of the boat should have been painted in some dark gray tones with meandering darker lines. To shape blurred. Surfacing under the periscope is necessary for communication. You can always run into a plane unexpectedly.

    The last four boats of the 671 series of the project were equipped with two torpedo tubes of a larger caliber - 650. This is for "thick" torpedo missiles. But since There was no space for this weapon initially, the control devices were in the aisle of the first compartment, near the wardroom and occupied, in fact, almost the only living free space for physical activities.
    For two months of autonomy without special exercises, the human musculoskeletal system became disordered. When you return to the base, the first thing at first you can’t breathe. Normal street air seems too dense. Next is the problem with the legs. It turns out that it is difficult to walk more than 50 meters. Somewhere during the week, these phenomena gradually disappear.

    They write in some publications that our autonomous boats went for 3 months. Boats 671 of the project for this period went rarely. The habitability of the compartments and the stock of products did not allow. After 3 months, many had cardiovascular problems. By the end of the two-month autonomy, they were already switching to dry potatoes, there are also problems with meat. The entire mode is scheduled for 4 hour shifts. The dream is also broken into pieces.

    For six months, crews usually went to the Indian Ocean. They went there with interchangeable crews and a floating base. Changed about 1 time per month. These were a few episodes.

    On large rocket carriers, the habitability is better, they went for long periods.

    Despite all these unfavorable factors. The sea for some reason pulls. Dreams on the marine theme for another 15-20 years dreamed after leaving. And the boats are remembered as a home.
    1. pavelk
      0
      7 August 2012 21: 16
      Dyakuyu, even tsikavo. +.
  9. Cadet787
    0
    7 August 2012 13: 38
    There was an article in the Criminal Code "for unauthorized surfacing."
  10. 0
    7 August 2012 13: 45
    This is not a boat, this is a beauty ...
  11. 0
    7 August 2012 15: 57
    Quote: GG2012
    Well, we don’t know all the details.
    I would like to believe that this was done on purpose! For example, before the boat was decommissioned, the wheelhouse was additionally strengthened, and a "special can opener" was welded on for opening cans from aircraft carriers !!!

    "... As a result, the maneuvers of the American Navy were curtailed and the Kitty Hawk, losing fuel oil through the hole, went to the Japanese dock ..."
    Maybe this is the point of the operation ?!

    If there are submariners on the site, please explain to me unreasonable! ...



    fantasy, of course, splashing over the edge. By the way, Evseenko received for the incident in full. Surfacing in the bottom of a ship of a probable adversary is unforgivable. No need for speculation
  12. iegudeil
    +2
    8 August 2012 02: 21
    An interesting incident was with the boat of our 3rd division.
    Our crew had to go to sea on course tasks. We went to Motovsky Bay, everything was fine at first, the weather was calm, the sea was calm, visibility was excellent. The commander gave the command to turn off the radar. I turned it off and sat on the radio intelligence. They walked on the surface. After about an hour, the command to turn on the radar arrives. I turn on, there is a continuous ripple on the screen. But it seems strange as a target, but an incredible amount. I report that I can’t determine the goals because too much, probably some kind of interference. Perhaps something is scattered on the surface of the sea. The commander enters the wheelhouse and tells me to go look at the periscope. I look, and there is no living place there, the entire water area is strewn with all sorts of fishing vessels, from boats to trawlers. A solid forest of ship masts. According to an average count of over 300 goals. The officer on duty on the bridge spoke to the natives in a megaphone, it turns out that the fishermen drove large schools of fish into Motovka. The entire military channel was blocked by nets. The fishermen themselves were not in a hurry to give way, the nets were already installed and nobody wants to lose them. Do not crush them? I don’t want to wind the network either. And they apologize, they did not think that another boat would pass. We understood that after the passage of one submarine, the fishermen thought it was possible to walk along the military fairway ...
    And this boat was our neighbors in the barracks - the crew of Gashkevich. They went out two hours earlier.
    We returned from coursework a few days later. "Gashkevichs" tell us.
    We reached Motovka and plunged in an hour later. After some time, the navigator reports that speed has fallen along the lag. In the central post, the shift was carried out by the old man. Gives the command to add 10 revolutions. The navigator reports, lag speed drops. Starpom - add 10 more turns. And so 3 times. After that, the start-up gave the command to surface under the periscope. I looked and saw that the hull of the ship was entangled in nets. Surfaced. There are a lot of all kinds of fishing schooners pieces under a hundred. In the stern behind the boat the trawler drags backwards. The crew of the trawler has already lowered the boats and is about to run away. But when they saw the boat they were very happy. It became clear who dragged them into the open sea. But then the commander very disappointed them when he gave the command to cut the network. Fortunately, they did not manage to reel on the screw. The trawl net is a very voluminous and powerful structure. Cut off, sent each other in the right direction and parted.
    And by the passage of our ship, the number of these fishermen has become several times greater. But we went overboard, so we were lucky.
    I can imagine the horror of the fishermen when something unknown dragged them into the open sea.
    For this incident, the fishermen are still fined. This never happened again.
  13. victor-sf
    0
    15 May 2014 14: 22
    The brightest memories are associated with the K-398 of project 671, despite all the difficult service of the submariner. I was lucky to go through the "big circle" and experience a lot: study at Kirov KUOPP, then in Obninsk, crew run-in (cap Gashkevich E.-V.B.) in the Northern Fleet (Zapadnaya Litsa), then launching our submarine in Leningrad (LAO), "delivery" by water from Leningrad to the White Sea, sea trials with factory specialists, arrival in Zapadnaya Litsa under the command of Admiral Chernov, course tasks, shooting, Severodvinsk DOK and finally "autonomous", combat service in Mediterranean, where we found ourselves at the center of the Arab-Israeli war. And so many things happened during these three years of military service! And more than once the emergency alarm threw a dose of adrenaline into the blood! But we survived! Thank God and the commander! If someone is familiar with what I have described, please respond!
    ... let's drink for a short rest, for the fact that we are all together. Let’s drink for our submarines, for our harsh sea. For meeting again, bypassing the abyss of events. For the number of dives equal the number of ascent!
  14. 0
    17 March 2015 15: 43
    Fourth - turbine (autonomous turbine units were placed in it);
    The fifth, electrical, served to house auxiliary mechanisms (the sanblock was in it); recourse belay negative
  15. -1
    3 November 2020 21: 55
    However, later it turned out that with such an arrangement, the speed of the submarine at the time of torpedo fire should not exceed 11 knots (this was unacceptable for tactical reasons: unlike the American-made Thresher-type nuclear submarine, the Soviet submarine was intended to destroy not only submarines, but also large surface ships of the enemy)

    American nuclear submarines are shooting at full speed, it seems someone is wrong here?