Military Review

Japanese military first showed Type 10 tank inside

85
Japanese military first showed Type 10 tank inside

A Japanese video appeared on the web tank Type 10, for the first time since being adopted by the Japanese military, journalists were allowed to look inside the tank.


The fourth generation tank began to be developed in the 1990s. In Japan, Type 10 was first demonstrated in the city of Sagamihara on February 13, 2008 at the research center of the Ministry of Defense of Japan (TRDI). During development work, this tank was known under the indices MVT-X and TK-X. The tank entered the arsenal of the Japanese army in January 2012.


The main parameters of Type 10: length (with gun forward) - 9420 mm; height - 2300 mm; width - 3240 mm; weight - 44 tons, crew - 3 people. The main armament is a Japanese-made 120 mm smoothbore gun with a 44-caliber barrel length. Caliber anti-aircraft machine gun - 12,7 mm, coaxial - 7,62 mm. The automatic loader is located in the rear of the tower. The maximum speed of the car when driving on paved roads is 70 kilometers per hour. Hydropneumatic suspension makes it possible to change the clearance of the car, tilt it to the sides. The car uses modular ceramic composite armor, and an engine with a capacity of 1200 hp. accelerates it to 70 km / h.

The main emphasis in the development of the tank was made on C4I systems and on increasing mobility, protection and firepower. To provide a higher level of protection, additional mounted modules can be used, while the mass of the machine increases to 48 tons.
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. svp67
    svp67 15 July 2020 15: 48
    +9
    Hmm, but the most interesting, for example, the work of the Ministry of Health, was not shown ...
    1. credo
      credo 15 July 2020 16: 35
      14
      Quote: svp67
      Hmm, but the most interesting, for example, the work of the Ministry of Health, was not shown ...

      Is this the most interesting? In my opinion, the most interesting thing is that this product is clearly not defensive, but offensive in nature and it is created to strengthen the local army, and after all, according to the results of the WWII of Japan, it is forbidden to have armed forces.
      Therefore, the lack of reaction and notes of protest from the Southeast Asian countries, the most affected by Japanese fascism, as well as Russia as the successor to the USSR and the winner in WWII, is interesting.
      The annual August reminders in Russia of the atomic bombing of two Japanese cities in 1945 in some part of the Russian population develop a false sense of compassion for Japan and the Japanese, while meanwhile Japan shares the first place with the number of Southeast Asian citizens killed and the cruelty shown to the civilian population fascist Germany.
      1. svp67
        svp67 15 July 2020 16: 50
        19
        Quote: credo
        In my opinion, the most interesting thing is that this product is clearly not defensive, but offensive

        There is no purely "offensive" or "defensive" weapon, it all depends on the tactics of their use
        1. credo
          credo 15 July 2020 17: 15
          +2
          Quote: svp67
          Quote: credo
          In my opinion, the most interesting thing is that this product is clearly not defensive, but offensive

          There is no purely "offensive" or "defensive" weapon, it all depends on the tactics of their use

          I did not engage in lawyers in Japan, but as a representative of a country that has repeatedly experienced the aggressive desires of the Japanese, I doubt that this product is created to deter a hypothetical invader of Japan on the territory of Japan itself, therefore, the thesis on defense is completely not applicable to Japan fits though it is a favorite horror story in the lips of Japanese politicians.
          1. svp67
            svp67 15 July 2020 17: 18
            +6
            Quote: credo
            I didn’t hire lawyers in Japan,

            And where does the knowledge of the basics of military affairs?
            Quote: credo
            which more than once experienced the predatory aspirations of the Japanese

            You know, there are many states and peoples from which we experienced MUCH MUCH more ...
            Quote: credo
            therefore, with respect to Japan, the defense thesis is completely inappropriate

            This is purely your opinion ...
            1. credo
              credo 15 July 2020 17: 37
              +2
              Quote: svp67
              Quote: credo
              I didn’t hire lawyers in Japan,

              And where does the knowledge of the basics of military affairs?

              Despite the fact that knowledge of the fundamentals of military affairs, in addition to everything else, involves knowledge of the theater of operations. Of course, you can reassure yourself that Japanese tanks are needed for defensive operations on the territory of Japan itself, but it looks quite unconvincing.

              Quote: svp67
              Quote: credo
              which more than once experienced the predatory aspirations of the Japanese

              You know, there are many states and peoples from which we experienced MUCH MUCH more ...

              We are talking about a specific state, and not many others, so there is no point in taking the discussion aside.

              Quote: svp67
              Quote: credo
              therefore, with respect to Japan, the defense thesis is completely inappropriate

              This is purely your opinion ...

              Of course, this is purely my opinion, which is based on historical facts, so if you have information about how certain countries of the world or just the troops of a mainland conqueror fought in Japan, trying to capture it, you can tell about it .
              1. svp67
                svp67 15 July 2020 18: 09
                +6
                Quote: credo
                Of course, you can reassure yourself that Japanese tanks are needed for defensive operations on the territory of Japan itself, but it looks rather unconvincing.

                I just said that weapons do not determine what kind of war you will wage. "Offensive" or "defensive", the rest is just your speculation
                Quote: credo
                We are talking about a specific state, and not many others, so there is no point in taking the discussion aside.

                Well, then tell us how much we have suffered from them, and most importantly in what period and so, for fun, compare with a number of other states, with the Crimean Khanate, Poland, France, England, Germany, in the end
                Quote: credo
                therefore, if you have information about how certain countries of the world or simply the troops of a certain mainland conqueror fought in Japan, trying to capture it, you can tell about it.

                Yes, what problems then, read the History from what the invasion was saved by the wind in Japan - "Kamikaze", about the "black ships" of Admiral Perry ...
                1. Kuroneko
                  Kuroneko 16 July 2020 13: 46
                  0
                  I would also add to your opponent that, oddly enough, the maximum number of wars and conflicts Russia had not even with Turkey, but with the Swedes!

                  As for Type 10, it is specifically designed for the Japanese transport network and the load of about 80% of Japanese bridges. It was made precisely by weight for primarily Japanese communications by weight.

                  I had a similar conversation with one dude, who also booted something on the "ten".
      2. 5-9
        5-9 15 July 2020 17: 42
        +5
        It’s just defensive, it has a hydraulic suspension with variable clearance and a ridiculous weight and protection for its size ... And all for protecting native Nippon mountains ... Semi-mountain tank
        1. credo
          credo 15 July 2020 18: 09
          -6
          Quote: 5-9
          It’s just defensive, it has a hydraulic suspension with variable clearance and a ridiculous weight and protection for its size ... And all for protecting native Nippon mountains ... Semi-mountain tank

          I see the regiment of defenders of Japan has arrived. If, in your classification of "semi-mountainous" tanks, this product is intended to protect the Japanese mountainous spaces, then with the same success they can be used in the vast expanses of Southeast Asia, which is a mountainous area. And since, despite the prohibition following the WWII results, Japan has a rather impressive navy, it will not be difficult for it to transfer its tanks to the mainland theater of operations, despite the fact that there will be where to deploy, unlike the territory of Japan itself.
          Yes, by the way, for all the defenders of Japan, I want to remind you that many American military bases are located on its territory. Question - If a new product is defensive, then who is this daredevil who will climb to the Japanese islands to capture them along with American military bases? The question is not idle. Who needs such hemorrhoids.
          1. 5-9
            5-9 15 July 2020 18: 13
            +1
            What are the defenders? A scribe to this country, if the Americans leave .. And the post-samurai knows this ... The only thing that can unite 2 China and 2 Korea is let's conquer Nippon ...
            1. Boris ⁣ Shaver
              Boris ⁣ Shaver 15 July 2020 18: 28
              +2
              Quote: 5-9
              2 of China and 2 of Korea so this is Let's conquer Nippon

              Hindus to the heap. Then all of them in conquered Japan will even have to sleep standing up.
              1. 5-9
                5-9 15 July 2020 19: 12
                +5
                These are, with India, small graters in uninhabited mountains .. And the Nippons, the Chinese (peaceful), were chopped off their heads for the time being for hype and milenders, the Koreans also ... And there was no revenge with a shot in the court of the Ampirator and 200 mulennas of raped nippons ... There fierce hatred shirnarmass ...
                1. Boris ⁣ Shaver
                  Boris ⁣ Shaver 15 July 2020 19: 28
                  0
                  Quote: 5-9
                  There is fierce hatred

                  It is understandable request
            2. Boris ⁣ Shaver
              Boris ⁣ Shaver 15 July 2020 19: 31
              -1
              Quote: 5-9
              This country is a scribe, if the Americans leave ..

              The Americans are not there to protect the Japanese. Otherwise, they would not be offered them a target on themselves to draw in the form of a pro. The Japanese, well, not the Poles - they refused
          2. Avior
            Avior 15 July 2020 18: 36
            +2
            Only recently quoted. There is no such lock, and unfortunately
            The Japanese had a self-ban on any war in the context, but they understand it very flexibly.
            Prior to this, their self-defense of their territory is not a war, but now, they flexibly rethought and realized that if they help the Allies defend themselves, even abroad, this is not a war either.
            So the tanks fit into their new vision.
          3. Free wind
            Free wind 15 July 2020 20: 22
            +1
            There was no ban on the army, following the results of the Second World War. The Japanese themselves wrote down on the defensive doctrine in the constitution, and they call the army self-defense forces. Suppose the Yapis did not have marines and airborne assault forces. But now the military is insistently asking for a little amendment to the constitution.
      3. kutuz
        kutuz 15 July 2020 19: 20
        0
        "This product is clearly not defensive, but offensive" - ​​where have you seen defensive tanks?
      4. Allex
        Allex 16 July 2020 07: 38
        +1
        You still forgot to indicate that the Second World War began precisely with the Japanese aggression against China.
    2. Invoce
      Invoce 15 July 2020 16: 37
      -16 qualifying.
      The loading mechanism is 100% at height, like everything else made in Japan. In World War II, there were excellent Japanese planes on the theater of operations, but all this did not help the Kwantung Army to provide any resistance whatsoever to either the Amers or the Soviet Army.
      So this is a great potential trophy ... (Engine good, Management systems, etc.)
      More good trophies!
      1. svp67
        svp67 15 July 2020 16: 44
        11
        Quote: Invoce
        The loading mechanism is 100% at height, like everything else made in Japan.

        Quote: Invoce
        So this is a great potential trophy ...

        Well, so-so....
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 15 July 2020 18: 19
          0
          I will say the seditious thing that the tank crew should not engage in heavy repair work, such as replacing the rollers or pulling the track.
          You do not require the pilots to repair their planes?
          A modern tank is full of electronics and screens. And it is important that the tankers are familiar with this technique.
          So that you can work for hours in virtual space without protruding from the tank
          Then they will be able to effectively shoot and maneuver.
          And the tank should be repaired by technicians on special tracked armored personnel carriers - "technical". With special equipment, not crowbars.
          1. svp67
            svp67 15 July 2020 18: 22
            12
            Quote: voyaka uh
            I will say the seditious thing that the tank crew should not engage in heavy repair work, such as replacing the rollers or pulling the track.

            Well, practice shows that they should ... since this affects the mobility of the armored vehicle, and you simply won't chase each tank with a bunch of repairmen.
            Quote: voyaka uh
            You do not require the pilots to repair their planes?

            And is he able to do this in flight?
            1. RMT
              RMT 15 July 2020 23: 13
              +2
              pilots and on the ground are not doing repairs
              1. svp67
                svp67 16 July 2020 03: 43
                0
                Quote: RMT
                pilots and on the ground are not doing repairs

                So the crew is not always attracted to the repair ...
          2. badandrew
            badandrew 15 July 2020 20: 08
            +4
            Well, then the BREM is standing in front of the tank, and 2 crews are raping the caterpillar
          3. carstorm 11
            carstorm 11 16 July 2020 04: 07
            +4
            for sure) and the soldiers should not be able to clean weapons - let the hired cleaners go after them. On the battlefield, troubleshooting is quick; sometimes it’s the end of the battle you drag technicals in a raid? you are apparently disturbed by the fact that you are calculating everything based on your theater of operations. on ours, such tricks will end in just a massive loss of technology.
          4. Sanichsan
            Sanichsan 16 July 2020 11: 34
            +2
            Quote: voyaka uh
            I will say the seditious thing that the tank crew should not engage in heavy repair work, such as replacing the rollers or pulling the track.

            how to say ... this is a little cropped video. On the full version you can see how it was taken off. During the exercises of this miracle tank, the truck flew out of the blue on a maneuver. you yourself have inflated yourself shoes request there is also a video where this tank takes off its shoes on the autobahn. yes
          5. Selevc
            Selevc 17 July 2020 13: 37
            0
            I will say the seditious thing that the tank crew should not engage in heavy repair work, such as replacing the rollers or pulling the track.
            It’s all cool on an Israeli scale, but on a Japanese scale, let alone on a Russian scale, the crew must repair everything they can, and carrying an entire escort of servants through the vast expanses is stupid ...
            And the tank should be repaired by technicians on special tracked armored personnel carriers - "technical". With special equipment, not crowbars.
            The fact is that in Russian realities - the same thing always happens - the technicals are not clear where, the parts are missing, the equipment does not work as they should ... Therefore, it is in the Russian realities that repair with scrap and such a mother of all that is possible is most effective repair by tank crew ...
        2. Free wind
          Free wind 15 July 2020 20: 05
          +4
          Video norms. It is difficult to throw off a goose in a crease. A repair team arrived. A fly came up, why they didn’t use the crane, maybe they taught spirits to use crowbars. So it was possible to throw a goose on the spot, bandages on the rinks are worn out very much, probably they will change the rollers. Otherwise, you can throw a goose on the spot. An interesting helm on the tank. If this is the steering wheel of a mechanical drive, then it is very cool.
      2. Boris ⁣ Shaver
        Boris ⁣ Shaver 15 July 2020 18: 30
        +1
        Quote: Invoce
        like everything else made in Japan

        Subaru Legacy of the 20th year is a complete ram.
        1. Boris ⁣ Shaver
          Boris ⁣ Shaver 15 July 2020 19: 19
          +1
          Quote: Boris ⁣Razor
          Subaru Legacy of the 20th year is a complete ram.

          Yes, yes, boys - it’s complete. And you can’t help the minuses here.
          1. Free wind
            Free wind 15 July 2020 21: 02
            -5
            Having a typewriter for 2,5 lyama, you yourself somehow help yourself. Buy viburnum, yellow, and preferably two and a tow truck. And there will be happiness to you.
            1. Albert1988
              Albert1988 15 July 2020 23: 49
              +1
              Quote: Free Wind
              Buy viburnum

              Little remark - viburnum was discontinued ...
            2. ZAV69
              ZAV69 16 July 2020 09: 10
              +2
              Quote: Free Wind
              Buy viburnum

              And this is generally how lucky. A colleague bought one of the first. And hell wrapped on it knows how much. Nothing serious broke.
    3. Private-K
      Private-K 16 July 2020 08: 11
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      Hmm, but the most interesting, for example, the work of the Ministry of Health, was not shown ...

      The most interesting thing is to find out whether the Japanese were able to fit normal armor protection into 44 tons, or was there a T-54 with hinged additional screens.
      1. Albert1988
        Albert1988 16 July 2020 18: 23
        0
        Quote: Private-K
        The most interesting thing is to find out whether the Japanese were able to fit normal armor protection into 44 tons, or was there a T-54 with hinged additional screens.

        Pocheiu only with mounted additional screens? there is also a good electronic filling. And so yes - it’s not worth much to compare the armor protection of this machine with any abrashes)))
  2. Evil 55
    Evil 55 15 July 2020 15: 57
    0
    In the carriage, judging by their appearance, they are Japanese "partisans" .. In general, let them be glad that their equipment appears only in parades.
    1. Senka naughty
      Senka naughty 15 July 2020 16: 03
      -1
      Judging by the points, Japanese tankers have vision problems, but let's hope they all have spare ones for unforeseen sutuations.
      1. Private-K
        Private-K 16 July 2020 08: 17
        0
        Points do not interfere with the fight.
    2. Private-K
      Private-K 16 July 2020 08: 15
      +2
      Quote: Evil 55
      In the carriage, judging by their appearance, they are Japanese "partisans" .. In general, let them be glad that their equipment appears only in parades.

      I have no Japanese "partisans" - a mercenary army.
      Moreover, soldiers often serve very long periods and you can easily see age-related (over 30, or even under 40) privates. I once saw a Japanese storyline movie, just about the only Japanese tank division, so marveled at this.
  3. Ded_Mazay
    Ded_Mazay 15 July 2020 16: 04
    0
    Not only is there nothing particularly interesting in the form, but also the quality is lame ...
    1. Charik
      Charik 15 July 2020 18: 03
      -2
      Well, well, like all Japanese auto-ugly and substandard-from that half of the world they ride on them, even abreks with machine guns laughing
    2. Charik
      Charik 15 July 2020 22: 03
      -3
      no offense, a good joke from a comedy club- "HAHAHA I'm laughing in your face" -for your minus for the Japanese car industry
  4. Alexey from Perm
    Alexey from Perm 15 July 2020 16: 05
    0
    Looks good
    1. neri73-r
      neri73-r 15 July 2020 16: 28
      +2
      Quote: Alexey from Perm
      Looks good

      And rides cheerfully! Affected by low weight, in comparison with other Western tanks.
      1. Alexey from Perm
        Alexey from Perm 15 July 2020 18: 15
        +2
        I agree, and the engine is 1200 hp
    2. Albert1988
      Albert1988 15 July 2020 17: 33
      12
      Quote: Alexey from Perm
      Looks good

      You know what the most interesting thing? When they showed our long-suffering T-14 fittings from the inside, where the interior of the capsule looked little different (displays, controls), some state police officers began to find fault - they say this is all an outdated primitive, but for the Japanese it "looks good"
      1. Alexey from Perm
        Alexey from Perm 15 July 2020 18: 16
        -3
        Well, Armata should not be criticized for having displays. but for the size and power of the engine. And also KAZ on Armata will protect from Toe, but not from Javelin and ammunition from UAVs.
        1. Prahlad
          Prahlad 15 July 2020 22: 58
          +5
          He has protection from javelin, on the roof there are special aerosols that hide or erode the silhouette of the tank.
          1. Alexey from Perm
            Alexey from Perm 15 July 2020 23: 18
            -3
            well then you can sleep peacefully if aerosols save)
        2. Albert1988
          Albert1988 15 July 2020 23: 46
          +1
          Quote: Alexey from Perm
          Well, Armata should not be criticized for having displays. but for the size and power of the engine. And also KAZ on Armata will protect from Toe, but not from Javelin and ammunition from UAVs.

          But it was just for the displays))) And the dimensions, taking into account the very small tower itself, are not so outstanding there, Western tanks are not far behind, the engine is not such a problem, it eats too much fuel and it is difficult to repair, yes - flaws, but over time a new dviglo will appear, do you say KAZ does not protect against javelins? So this is not his task - he protects from BOPS, this is the main thing, he protects from Javs, as they wrote in the comment below - the "umbrella" system is a softkill, but effective))) The difference is that the javelin is shot down or flew away into the hemp distance, because the goal lost?
          1. Alexey from Perm
            Alexey from Perm 16 July 2020 00: 11
            -2
            I would not be so sure if the javelin lost the target on the ascending line of the trajectory. then that would be true, I don’t know in which section of the trajectory the radar detects launch, if it approaches it hardly it will fail .. Even western tanks look smaller than Armata. And the tower at Armata is not at all small.
            1. Albert1988
              Albert1988 16 July 2020 18: 21
              +1
              Quote: Alexey from Perm
              I would not be so sure if the javelin lost the target on the ascending line of the trajectory. then this would be true, I don’t know in which section of the trajectory the radar detects launch, if it is unlikely to be lost when it approaches the target

              The infrared head, when it loses its target (lights up, etc.), is inclined to lead the missile along completely unpredictable trajectories. moreover, a machine spraying an aerosol cloud above itself can quickly change its location.
              Quote: Alexey from Perm
              Even western tanks look smaller than Armata.

              Yah? and where? You estimate - how it looks in the field - when you see from a few kilometers not the whole tank, but only its part - namely the tower ... The body of the T-14 is 20 centimeters higher than that of other cars, and the tower is not inhabited , and very small, its defeat does not strongly guarantee the death or complete failure of the machine. Western cars will have a huge shed sticking out - break it and the tank is guaranteed to be dead.
              Quote: Alexey from Perm
              And the tower at Armata is not at all small.

              Well, yes, not small - the width of a meter, a height of 90 cm, a length of 2 meters)))) I suggest - everything else that is hung on it does not matter much)))
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. Alexey from Perm
                Alexey from Perm 16 July 2020 23: 10
                0
                there were pictures on the VO, look there are given dimensions
                1. Albert1988
                  Albert1988 17 July 2020 13: 42
                  0
                  Quote: Alexey from Perm
                  there were pictures on the VO, look there are given dimensions

                  Og, where did these little pictures come from? Someone drew something according to their assumptions and a mustache, in fact ...
  5. Livonetc
    Livonetc 15 July 2020 16: 14
    0
    Quote: Senka Naughty
    Judging by the points, Japanese tankers have vision problems, but let's hope they all have spare ones for unforeseen sutuations.

    Apparently, the C4i system copes well.
  6. KCA
    KCA 15 July 2020 16: 26
    -6
    Hospidi, well, yapps don’t know how to make tanks, as well as any military equipment and weapons, they wouldn’t have snuffed, they, like their friend in overlord, have RK for them, but they see tanks, and this, everyone sees
    1. KCA
      KCA 15 July 2020 17: 02
      -3
      Cons, as I understand it, from Japaneseophiles? I haven’t seen it, but I can imagine how the tank gives a stop to both goslings, and the team in Ovos will break its portfolio, well, it’s so, trifles, in comparison with combat capabilities, can’t cut the goslings if only the cross-eyed disabled person with SVD, rubber and plastic are good at parade, and in battle it’s like a rag on a whore, it only excites, but does not interfere
      1. psiho117
        psiho117 15 July 2020 18: 37
        +3
        Quote: KCA
        rubber and plastic are good at the parade

        Funny.
        Do you want the tank to drive and turn the asphalt at the exhibition, in front of the audience, with metal lugs?
    2. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 15 July 2020 17: 48
      +1
      I strongly doubt that Koreans who hate the Japanese at the genetic level will begin to arm them ...
      1. KCA
        KCA 15 July 2020 18: 30
        0
        Here, yes, a complex system, on the one hand the United States’s dad, on the other hand, Koreans’ love for Japan, good Koreans will never forgive the genzid for Yap, that's why the United States is against any progress between the Republic of Kazakhstan and the DPRK
  7. Krasnodar
    Krasnodar 15 July 2020 16: 34
    -2
    Toyota Aventis
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 15 July 2020 17: 01
      +1
      And "carts" filled the entire Middle East. We do not know how they got there.
  8. Undecim
    Undecim 15 July 2020 17: 24
    +9
    The main armament is a Japanese-made 120 mm smoothbore gun with a 44-caliber barrel length.
    Really even TTX can not be rewritten without mistakes.
    The main armament of the Type 10 tank is a Japanese-made 120-mm smoothbore gun with a barrel length of 50 or 55 calibers.
    1. Ryaruav
      Ryaruav 15 July 2020 20: 19
      +2
      120/44 so this is the rhine metal visible license
  9. 5-9
    5-9 15 July 2020 17: 40
    +1
    Of the Asian variations on the theme of Leo2 only with AZ (for Negro beater Nemae), for me, K2 is better ... And this is a cardboard tank for 10 lyam bucks in 2008 prices, when it was still amazing, produced 10-20 pieces a year ...
  10. Observer2014
    Observer2014 15 July 2020 18: 23
    -1
    An interesting car. Design for four. Why not five? For you can feel the traditional German school. And imitation is not a standard. The Japanese are very, very friendly with Germany in military matters. This is their tradition from the last century connected. A tank agree is very similar to the products of Rheinmetall
    I can not judge the other features of the tank. Reliability and security in battle. For obvious reasons. Japanese cars do not participate in real clashes. This is good. Let it remain so. yes
    1. Shuttle
      Shuttle 16 July 2020 06: 41
      0
      Quote: Observer2014
      An interesting car. Design for four. Why not five? For you can feel the traditional German school. And imitation is not a standard. The Japanese are very, very friendly with Germany in military matters. This is their tradition from the last century connected. A tank agree is very similar to the products of Rheinmetall
      I can not judge the other features of the tank. Reliability and security in battle. For obvious reasons. Japanese cars do not participate in real clashes. This is good. Let it remain so. yes


      You look at the insides. Lighter than a German, automatic loader, three people. Rather, he looks like our tanks.
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 17 July 2020 18: 38
        -3
        Quote: Shuttle
        Quote: Observer2014
        An interesting car. Design for four. Why not five? For you can feel the traditional German school. And imitation is not a standard. The Japanese are very, very friendly with Germany in military matters. This is their tradition from the last century connected. A tank agree is very similar to the products of Rheinmetall
        I can not judge the other features of the tank. Reliability and security in battle. For obvious reasons. Japanese cars do not participate in real clashes. This is good. Let it remain so. yes


        You look at the insides. Lighter than a German, automatic loader, three people. Rather, he looks like our tanks.

        No. No, you can argue a lot with me for a long time. But the Germans and the Japanese, I understand very well. There is a German basis. With the traditional Japanese component. By the way, as we say, there are fraternal people. It’s like Cubans and Russians, for example. It’s there too. Well, only with their mentality and economic capabilities.
  11. Ryaruav
    Ryaruav 15 July 2020 20: 15
    +1
    everything is very beautiful and modern, but the question is when you have a gap of 25 kg 122mm of-462 (old) on your armor, then I suppose (what kind of penetration of armor God forbid) all the outdoor sensors cease to function, here at the biathlon in the buffet table after serving , and in Europe the percentage will not be very much on both sides
  12. alma
    alma 15 July 2020 20: 46
    +6
    For me - so an ordinary tank, nothing outstanding. For Japan, probably a minimum of imports is important.
  13. Hydrography Bay Golden Horn
    Hydrography Bay Golden Horn 15 July 2020 21: 13
    +1
    A good tank, it’s strange that others don’t buy it, Australia for example
    1. cat Rusich
      cat Rusich 15 July 2020 22: 26
      0
      Australian Defense Forces - 59 M1A1 AIM Abrams (each $ 1,18 million, direct from the US Army), plans a $ 10 billion upgrade. Japan's Tour XNUMX has to rely only on the Japan Self-Defense Forces.
  14. Izotovp
    Izotovp 15 July 2020 22: 24
    0
    Somehow the ultra-modern Japanese tank was not impressed. Not better than the 80s or the 90th. Very not better.
    1. strelokmira
      strelokmira 15 July 2020 23: 23
      -1
      Somehow the ultra-modern Japanese tank was not impressed. Not better than the 80s or the 90th. Very not better.

      And what's worse - a review system, maybe the AZ and the layout of the ammunition are not all over the hull or the dimensions of the shells failed, probably the engines are 80/90 more powerful, or maybe the electronics is a level higher?
  15. Victorio
    Victorio 15 July 2020 22: 53
    +1
    and inside with a place not very
  16. Gloomy skeptic
    Gloomy skeptic 16 July 2020 01: 25
    0
    From the video, I understood the MAIN idea: garbage that all the paint was peeling off inside the tank and all the bespectacles were tankers, the most important part of the defense is the bushes trimmed to the tank, because it’s them, made of native Japanese grass, that will help tankers defeat all opponents!
    At least all the dung flies, these bushes are clearly scared !!!
    And how to "advertise" their "power": [media = http: // https: //www.youtube.com/watch? V = HiREQboYozY]
  17. Graz
    Graz 16 July 2020 06: 17
    +2
    with such dimensions it weighs little, I don’t know what kind of ceramics there is on it, but security is in question, personally for me
  18. Shuttle
    Shuttle 16 July 2020 06: 37
    +2
    An interesting car made. In appearance, the authors were inspired by the idea of ​​Leopard and Abrams. But in fact the tank is more similar to Soviet / Russian vehicles. AZ, machine gun weapons, mass, mobility. I wonder how failed hydropneumatic suspension? In the video, the piece of iron does not stick anywhere. And the shooting was conducted at all on a polygon smooth as a billiard table. It’s clear that for beginners to study, that’s it. But there will be no such training ground in the war.
    It is very likely that the Japanese designers took into account the experience of both the Kwantung Army and Khalkhin Gola.
  19. egsp
    egsp 16 July 2020 08: 45
    0
    "120mm", maybe "millimeter"?
  20. Wolf
    Wolf 16 July 2020 11: 34
    0
    You shouldn't have criticized the Japanese tank. The basis of good armored vehicles est is heavy civilian vehicles. There, the Yaps have "KOMATSU", probably seen in Russia? Excellent technology, and heavy engines and grip and driver comfort, and works in Yakutia at -40. In addition, there is no better SUV in this world than TOYOTA, it works in Yakutia and the Sahara equally and in the Himalayas.
    Most importantly 44t and 1200hp. What’s the matter with the reservation? What gun and charge? But they say that it is possible to add KAZ 4 tons and then there will be 48 tons. at 1200ls. The main problem is that Japanese technicians are expensive, but they doubt that it is worth not worth it!
    1. Wolf
      Wolf 16 July 2020 11: 46
      +2
      In WWII, the main problem for the example of the Japanese army were airplanes. Weak engine for this Zero is a bad quarterback. Oopsie air sieles were below the level of American. The fact that tankers with glasses pa is normal for them, the yellow race of the ice creatures is weak genetically it’s hard to get good pilots.
      Today, the level of Yapov’s technology is at the Western level and somewhere is better, but they are generally superior in quality to the Western level by 1 level. Reliability of technology is one of the very head attributes of Japanese technology.
      1. Wolf
        Wolf 16 July 2020 11: 49
        0
        Vopros tank odbranitelni or to attack? Odes of the 10th century, heavy armor was used to defeat the enemy’s defense, but it can also be chosen. .
  21. Forest
    Forest 17 July 2020 13: 33
    +1
    Let him come to the tank biathlon, see how he will stall and lose tracks)