Military Review

In Kronstadt, dock repair of the Boyky corvette of the Baltic Fleet completed

25
In Kronstadt, dock repair of the Boyky corvette of the Baltic Fleet completed

At the Kronstadt Marine Plant, dock repair of the project 20380 Boyky corvette was completed. This was reported by the press service of the enterprise.


According to the report, the corvette arrived for service in mid-May of this year. In the course of the work carried out on the ship, the underwater hull was painted, inspection and repair of bottom-side valves, as well as other mechanisms and assemblies were carried out.

Currently, the corvette is preparing to move to St. Petersburg, where it will take part in the Main Naval Parade in honor of the Russian Navy.

The Boyky Corvette is the third in a series of Project 20380 ships built at the Severnaya Verf shipyard for the Russian Navy. Laid down on July 27, 2005, launched on April 15, 2011. On May 16, 2013, the Russian Navy flag was hoisted on the ship; the corvette became part of the Baltic fleet.

Displacement standard 1800 tons, total 2220 tons. The length is the largest 104,5 meters, width 13 meters, maximum draft 7,95 meters. Maximum speed 27 knots, economic 14 knots. Cruising range from 3500 to 4000 miles at 14 knots. The autonomy of navigation in terms of provisions 15 days. The crew is 99 people.

Engines: 4 16D49 diesel engines, 2 shafts, 2 five-blade propellers. Power: 23320 l. from. or 17140 kW.

Armament: 2x4 URK rocket launcher with the Monument-A SU, 3x4 Redut air defense missile systems (12 9M96 SAMs), one 100-mm Universal gun mount A190-01 with Puma artillery system, two 30-mm gun mounts AK-630M, two 14,5-mm machine-gun mounts MTTPU, 2x4 330-mm PU PTZ "Pack-NK", 2 grenade launchers DP-64, 1 Ka-27 helicopter.
Photos used:
Press Service of the Kronstadt Marine Plant
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Eldorado
    Eldorado 15 July 2020 10: 34 New
    +5
    Seven feet under the keel! soldier
  2. Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 15 July 2020 10: 38 New
    -8
    there are a lot of ships in the Baltic, but on the Northern Fleet and Kamchatka, on the contrary, there are not enough ships, why a frigate and 4 corvettes on the Baltic Fleet? Baltic Buyanov and Karakurt
    1. Eldorado
      Eldorado 15 July 2020 10: 50 New
      +1
      Quote: vladimir1155
      there are a lot of ships in the Baltic, but on the Northern Fleet and Kamchatka, on the contrary, there are not enough ships, why a frigate and 4 corvettes on the Baltic Fleet? Baltic Buyanov and Karakurt

      Weird question. Some Germans have the Navy stronger than our DCBF. Plus Sweden, Denmark, Poland. UK with the USA will also add boats. A couple of corvettes in the Baltic can not do without ...
      1. Vladimir1155
        Vladimir1155 15 July 2020 11: 31 New
        -5
        Quote: El Dorado
        Weird question

        and what are you going to play in boats, who has more to measure? My opinion is that other European countries do not need a fleet in the Baltic, except for a couple of corvettes, For example, Finland has only minesweepers, Finns are smart. In any case, the countries you have listed have free access to the sea, and not a narrow strait blocked not only by mines, but also by nets, plus the Kaliningrad enclave ... the experience of two world wars showed the fleet’s total inefficiency in the Baltic due to the narrowness and smallness of this reservoir .. ., and the submarine base in Kamchatka is not covered at all.
        1. 1976AG
          1976AG 15 July 2020 12: 08 New
          +3
          Well, when other countries remove their fleet from the Baltic, then we will think whether we need ships there or not.
        2. Shadow041
          Shadow041 15 July 2020 14: 44 New
          +1
          And what are you going to defend Kaliningrad without a fleet with promises of a two-faced Luke ?!
      2. AclfgKt8
        AclfgKt8 15 July 2020 12: 28 New
        +1
        Just when something big appears near our territorial waters and we have to push it forward. So accepted.
        NATO countries have many ships, and if they begin massive provocative actions and our ship can find work to counter ... Not all the time, our ships will be at sea ..
        1. ydjin
          ydjin 15 July 2020 13: 11 New
          +1
          “It's just when something big appears near our territorial waters and we have to put forward something to meet it.
          NATO countries have many ships, and if they start massive provocative actions and our ship will find work to counter ... Our ships will not be at sea all the time .. "
          I think there will be enough ships like SKR, because the entire Baltic water area can be controlled by coastal complexes of RCC and Aviation.
          1. Shadow041
            Shadow041 15 July 2020 14: 46 New
            +3
            TFR is the Soviet name for a ship of the frigate type, and the largest in the Baltic States, the RF and the frigate, have nothing in combat. The largest combat ship of the Baltic Fleet of the Russian Federation is the frigate (TFR) Yaroslav the Wise.
            1. Alex777
              Alex777 24 July 2020 18: 51 New
              -1
              Have you forgotten about the destroyer Persistent? wink
              https://flotprom.ru/2019/33%D0%A1%D1%80%D0%B71/
          2. Vladimir1155
            Vladimir1155 15 July 2020 21: 16 New
            +1
            Quote: ydjin
            the entire Baltic water area can be controlled by coastal complexes of RCC and Aviation.
            that's exactly what it is, and Kaliningrad needs to be covered with coastal means and RTOs
        2. Vladimir1155
          Vladimir1155 15 July 2020 21: 14 New
          +1
          Quote: AclfgKt8
          Just when something big appears near our territorial waters and we have to push it forward. So accepted.
          I don’t know what is accepted, .... by whom? what is it accepted for? well, you can send a Buyan-M or Karakurt or BDK into the sea ... maybe someone in the Baltic needs to move forward when a NATO warship approaches .... but the nuclear submarine base in Kamchatka is defenseless, just because "it is customary to move towards "in the Baltic ... and so in wartime it is customary to destroy unprotected bases of nuclear submarines and sink the nuclear submarines right when leaving them ... what is more important to" advance "in the Baltic or provide strategic submarines with cover?
    2. Galleon
      Galleon 15 July 2020 11: 51 New
      +5
      Baltic corvettes go to Mediterranean to Syria.
      1. Tahtvjd2868
        Tahtvjd2868 15 July 2020 12: 01 New
        +2
        So therefore, they have a direct road to the Black Sea Fleet. Why burn excess fuel?
        1. Galleon
          Galleon 15 July 2020 13: 38 New
          +1
          If the interests of the state are now strongly tied to Syria, this is not a reason for the hypertrophied development of the Black Sea Fleet. The operational naval unit, which may include the pennant of any Russian fleet, is engaged in interaction with the Syrian land group, which is what is happening. In addition, the Baltic Fleet is still close to the center of NATO, and we need missile-carrying ships in the Baltic at least for the presence and display of the flag, in peacetime. And to the Black Sea Fleet, if necessary, quickly transfer the "Karakurt" from the Caspian Sea. They pass Volgo-Don, very close.
          1. Vladimir1155
            Vladimir1155 15 July 2020 21: 22 New
            0
            Quote: Galleon
            If the state’s interests are now strongly tied to Syria, this is not a reason for the hypertrophic development of the Black Sea Fleet
            it’s smarter to develop the Black Sea Fleet than to drive corvettes around Europe that are completely unnecessary in the Baltic. Moreover, unlike the Baltic, the Black Sea Fleet has quite real tasks for the fleet, Syria, the Bosphorus and the operational space for the submarines ... although I think the Black Sea Fleet has a fully developed fleet corresponding to its tasks and it is not necessary to strengthen it (it can only be taken from there by the cruiser to the ocean). But it’s high time to pick up corvettes and frigates unnecessary in the Caspian, Baltic and Sea of ​​Japan.
            1. 1976AG
              1976AG 16 July 2020 06: 03 New
              +2
              Vladimir, in the Baltic, there are also quite real tasks for the fleet. I understand that you consider yourself smarter than many in the General Staff and Moscow Region, but you are very mistaken. There are no stupider people there.
              1. Galleon
                Galleon 16 July 2020 08: 54 New
                0
                Thanks for the answer to Vladimir, dear Alexey. You expressed including and my opinion.
                1. Vladimir1155
                  Vladimir1155 18 July 2020 09: 11 New
                  0
                  Quote: Galleon
                  Thanks for the answer to Vladimir, dear Alexey. You expressed including and my opinion.

                  that's when I have questions 1 why the General Staff of the Navy does not seek the development of naval aviation PLO, PMO? not a single aircraft was made in the Russian Federation, and now they have released a be200 in a mocking version of the Ministry of Emergency Situations. 2 why did the General Staff of the Navy not attend to cover the base of the nuclear submarine in Kamchatka with surface ships? 3 why does the General Staff of the Navy neglect the mine danger by releasing only one minesweeper per year?
  3. ydjin
    ydjin 15 July 2020 12: 25 New
    +1
    "Currently, the corvette is preparing to sail to St. Petersburg"
    Editors in the studio! Well, in general, the routine that would serve the technique should be looked after. How many vehicles were destroyed in the aircraft by improper care? Would you like to know these layouts?
  4. ydjin
    ydjin 15 July 2020 12: 25 New
    0
    "Currently, the corvette is preparing to sail to St. Petersburg"
    Editors in the studio! Well, in general, the routine that would serve the technique should be looked after. How many vehicles were destroyed in the aircraft by improper care? Would you like to know these layouts?
    1. ydjin
      ydjin 15 July 2020 13: 03 New
      0
      If only thanks, the author said for the detected bloop, thanks to which he could edit it. I am only for a clear presentation of information.
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 15 July 2020 13: 57 New
        0
        Quote: ydjin
        I am only for a clear presentation of information.

        Under each article there is a simple instruction for error messages. Already sent. yes
  5. xomaNN
    xomaNN 15 July 2020 13: 01 New
    +3
    KMOLZ was my first business trip to repair the Kronstadt BPK in 1979. The plant is working!
  6. Vlad Malkin
    Vlad Malkin 15 July 2020 15: 42 New
    0
    Cleaned, tinted and back on the road!