US Declares China's Claims for Disputed Territories in South China Sea Unlawful

27
US Declares China's Claims for Disputed Territories in South China Sea Unlawful

The United States has officially declared a number of territorial claims of China in the South China Sea illegal. This was stated by the head of the US State Department Mike Pompeo.

In a statement, Pompeo pointed out that the United States is strengthening its policy "regarding a vital part of the region - the South China Sea." In addition, according to the US Secretary of State, Washington considers it illegal "China's efforts to" bring the resources of the region under control through threats. "



According to the United States, China did not provide legal grounds for its policy regarding the disputed islands and territories. Washington emphasizes that in 2016, the arbitral tribunal rejected all claims of Beijing, and the United States will officially adhere to the position of arbitration in its policy.

Washington officially declared unlawful "any actions by China," "threatening the fishing and development of hydrocarbons by other countries" in the South China Sea region.

The world will not allow China to dispose of the South China Sea as its maritime empire

- declared Pompeo.

Official Beijing responded to Mike Pompeo's remarks by criticizing them.

China's position on the South China Sea is consistent and clear. Firmly defending its territorial sovereignty and rights and interests at sea, China adheres to a policy of settling disputes through negotiations and conferences with directly related states <...>. The United States is not a country directly involved in these disputes, but continues to intervene in this matter.

- The report says the Foreign Ministry of China.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    27 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. 0
      14 July 2020 10: 16
      This is already interesting. But what about the "Monroe Doctrine"?
      1. +4
        14 July 2020 10: 20
        Quote: iouris
        This is already interesting. But what about the "Monroe Doctrine"?

        She is in the other hemisphere ... stop
        1. +4
          14 July 2020 10: 49
          Quote: Hunter 2
          She is in the other hemisphere ...

          More "gunboat strategy" ...
          Here, at least they are not dissembling, saying that the dispute is over "hydrocarbons"
          1. +1
            14 July 2020 12: 18
            Quote: svp67
            Quote: Hunter 2
            She is in the other hemisphere ...

            More "gunboat strategy" ...
            Here, at least they are not dissembling, saying that the dispute is over "hydrocarbons"

            Pull your tentacles in all directions, the whole world. As they say --- their interests.
            1. +1
              14 July 2020 15: 09
              US Declares China's Claims for Disputed Territories in South China Sea Unlawful

              And China declared it illegal for the United States to interfere in other people's territorial disputes.
              Perhaps he really should raise this issue at the UN level. Russia will definitely support him.
    2. +1
      14 July 2020 10: 20
      Here s again, like here!
      "There is a plug in every barrel."
      When will they rip their navel?
      1. +1
        14 July 2020 11: 00
        Quote: Retvizan 8
        When will they rip their navel?

        Probably they are non-umbilical.
    3. +4
      14 July 2020 10: 21
      Blacks can’t be tamed at home, but yapping at China
      1. +3
        14 July 2020 10: 50
        Quote: maximNNX
        Blacks can’t be tamed at home, but yapping at China

        To solve any internal problems, any victorious external conflict has always been useful.
      2. -1
        14 July 2020 11: 09
        I quote Maxim. blacks can’t restrain themselvesThe truth is that. I propose organizing a worldwide boycott of US dollars with indicative burning of banknotes of $ 1 and $ 20, which depict portraits of the slave owners of Washington and Jackson. Executions in front of the buildings of the US embassies. But in Moscow, this will not happen directly. There are people, even though he is liberal, even though he is a patriot, but he loves dollars. It is possible for NGOs to oblige foreign agents to make their contribution to the fire material under threat of closure. But not only them, the Echo of Moscow, too - these contribute three times. They will know how to slander.
    4. +2
      14 July 2020 10: 24
      The first time I hear that the decision of the arbitration court has military support.
    5. +1
      14 July 2020 10: 24
      And everywhere they need to stick their nose, these islands are in the South China Sea, and not the Gulf of Mexico.
    6. +2
      14 July 2020 10: 33
      The world will not allow China to dispose of the South China Sea as its maritime empire

      The world or Washington is trying not to allow?
      I am often struck by the thought that all kinds of courts judge either innocent or petty bipods (abstract pocket thieves), but these criminals who are not just in camera, the gallows crying, do not notice point-blank. The feeling that he lives in an alternative reality, where everything is turned upside down.
      1. +1
        14 July 2020 16: 41
        In the capitalist world, the judicial system is also capitalist. It's one thing to catch and imprison some small punks in an exemplary manner, while writing several volumes of the "case" - it seems like the Law works. But when Capital has "democratic" interests, international law is cowardly silent, thereby justifying the most horrible crimes.
        "Thousands of invisible threads are entwined by the law. Cut one - a criminal, ten - a suicide bomber, all - God." (c) Perumov.
    7. +3
      14 July 2020 10: 35
      smile
      development of hydrocarbons by other countries "in the South China Sea region.
      ... So they would directly say, China, impedes the development of US hydrocarbons in the South China Sea, which does not wash the US coast at all ..
      1. 0
        14 July 2020 12: 25
        Quote: parusnik
        smile ..That would be directly said, China, prevents the development of US hydrocarbons in the South China Sea, which does not wash the US coast at all ..
        They used to say something like this about intervention if their interests are affected. Then it was about BV. Where is the USA and where is BV. However, their interests approached our borders
      2. 0
        14 July 2020 12: 25
        Quote: parusnik
        smile ..That would be directly said, China, prevents the development of US hydrocarbons in the South China Sea, which does not wash the US coast at all ..
        They used to say something like this about intervention if their interests are affected. Then it was about BV. Where is the USA and where is BV. However, their interests approached our borders
    8. +3
      14 July 2020 10: 39
      Well, firstly, the South China Sea has long been a disputed zone, many islands and resources! Plus, there are former US vassals who are asking for protection from China. And you can understand them. The Philippines, for example, are unlikely to be able to defend the rights to their territory against China. China behaves in this region brazenly and without ceremony, I know this firsthand! And most importantly, this is the beginning of a real cold war between the United States and China! And whoever passes whom, that will become the world hegemon! But the commentary of the Chinese side shows how they are afraid of confrontation with the United States! The Soviet Union at one time responded to such challenges more decisively and menacingly! China is still weak, but this confrontation is only in the hands of Russia! There is time to boost the economy while super powers sort things out! And try to make money on it!
    9. -7
      14 July 2020 10: 42
      It is funny, as readers of VO, recognize China’s right to the entire territory of Southeast Asia, without any reason, and violently criticize the United States, which advocate the established borders of states.
      In their fervor in the United States, China’s heels are ready to lick.
      1. -1
        14 July 2020 10: 57
        Quote: Courier
        Plus, there are former US vassals who are asking for protection from China.

        There are no former vassals.
    10. -1
      14 July 2020 10: 48
      The world will not allow China to dispose of the South China Sea as its maritime empire
      So the United States can, where they want to dispose, but China does not.
      The US is not a country directly involved in these disputes, but continues to intervene in this matter.
      So he himself answered, "We can, but you cannot." And China was so scared that it laughed.
    11. 0
      14 July 2020 10: 49
      US Declares China's Claims for Disputed Territories in South China Sea Unlawful
      Yes and? feel And if you really need to protect your maritime communications from amers. "Pearl thread" is not danced without them. request
    12. 0
      14 July 2020 10: 58
      The fact of claims is illegal, as is the United States. Let the neighbors decide the dispute, and not the overseas snout.
    13. 0
      14 July 2020 11: 00
      The opinion of the United States already has no authority for sovereign states.
      For bedding only.
    14. 0
      14 July 2020 11: 02
      It’s necessary to get a test tube.
    15. -1
      14 July 2020 12: 05
      The Chinese are happy. Instead of boring "regrets" it is quite clear
      China adheres to a policy ... of negotiations and meetings with the states directly related to this <...>. The United States is not a country directly involved in these disputes,[i] [/ i] however continue to intervene in this matter

      in general, a worthy answer translated from the diplomatic: "whose cow would bellow ..."
    16. 0
      14 July 2020 16: 02
      The Chinese spat on the opinion of the Americans from 123456789 floor.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"