Military Review

Do not shoot the anarchist

61
Do not shoot the anarchist

Confederate Century Nedolog



Today, official America, and not only America, is ready to hang all the dogs for universal dissension precisely on the anarchists. However, the authors are not at all going to give out indulgence to those who are now ready to crush everything and everything. Including the state. However, do not expect any justification, especially moral, regarding the prosecution for ideas, and not for specific crimes.

“We Will Not Let Anarchists Occupy Seattle,” “Anarchists Crave Chaos,” “Anarchists and Trotskyists Beat Again in Greece,” “Michael Pence: We Will Resist Marauders, Rebels and Anarchists,” “Donald Trump: Anarchists were Ultra-Left Maniacs.”

Screaming headlines in the media and harsh statements by politicians do not help to understand why the idea of ​​anarchy is so in demand. Alas, in most cases it is still perceived as permissiveness. But readers will forgive us for the next repetition of the theses from the previous article, the basis of the newly demanded anarchist ideas lies primarily in the priority of lower levels of power in comparison with higher ones.

If this alignment is applied to the highest power level, then a confederal state system should be considered as a legalized form of anarchy. Someone has already managed in connection with recent events to call the United States the country of total anarchism, although here, of course, it was meant completely different.

As you know, in the United States, most laws of individual states have an advantage over federal ones, but fortunately, the founding fathers of the 13 United States did not have enough of this kind of practice to go to the districts. It is by no means possible that then the Civil War, more precisely, many wars in the states at once, could have begun earlier than 80 years after the founding of the state.

Reconciliation with the Confederates, which took nearly a hundred years for supporters of the united United States, can now simply be sent to historical scrap. And the demolition of monuments under the good slogans of the fight against racism still necessarily comes with big problems. And it is unlikely that the United States will at least somehow settle down after the presidential election.

However, already at the time of Benjamin Franklin, George Washington and John Adams, usually the sheriff, and not the mayor, was in his town and the nearest district, as they say, both the king, and god, and the military commander. Even if he himself implicitly obeyed the sheriff and was afraid of a judge or district attorney.

Beyond Anarchy


It’s another matter that, on the other side of anarchy, it was most likely not really “false quarantine” that was really demanded, since it was real and very dangerous, it cannot be denied that, in most cases, representatives of the so-called elite, both the power and business, and culturally joined them. We will believe that after a prompt and, hopefully, painless exit from the “anti-crisis seat” in Russia, no new harsh measures will be required.

Of the liberal parties on this occasion, of course, they complain about the law-abiding electorate, competently prepared to sign amendments to the Constitution. But any comparisons of the general Russian public with the inhabitants of countries so dear to the heart of any liberal will clearly not be in their favor. No matter how much they boast of their civilization and tolerance.

However, what else to expect from those who so easily peck at the first bait? A bait that instantly fanned the fire of hatred, and hatred doesn’t matter to whom. In the United States, and after them in Europe, a massive impulse to receive everything without giving anything back, someone very soon took the form of an anti-racist protest.

Western proletariat swallowed the bait right there. And how could it be otherwise with his claims to the status of the middle class and with the complete absence of class consciousness - not anarchist, but Marxist. However, the directors of the color revolution, which unexpectedly happened “not at all there,” seem to be deeply mistaken at the address of their unprincipled electorate. Yes fakenews the truth has long been replaced for him, but he has not completely forgotten how to think.

The Western public now really looks quite manageable, moreover, with completely blurry ideas about social justice and eternal values. Sofa revolutionaries are now unable to perceive even the saint until recently the image of Commander Che. However, they will not be able to stay in a state of "do not know what they are doing."

In his programmatic article of 1906, Anarchism or Socialism, JV Stalin issued an extremely harsh sentence to the ideas of the Marxists ’competitors, who were at that time almost the main ones:

“It’s not a matter of who today the greater or lesser“ mass ”is following, but the essence of the doctrine. If the “doctrine” of the anarchists expresses the truth, then it goes without saying that it will surely pave its way and gather mass around itself. If it is untenable and built on a false basis, it will not last long and will hang in the air. ”

Anarchists, of whom few are known to the general public today, have been trying to refute this Stalinist postulate for more than a hundred years, but it turns out somehow badly. However, in the growing confrontation of “someone against someone”, sooner or later, the contradictions of the “upper and lower classes” will appear, originally indicated by both Marxists and anarchists in party programs.

Is that why an urgent vaccination of anarchy is now needed? And it doesn’t matter in what form, but powerful enough, because it is in demand. The vaccine seems to have already been taken; antidotes have already been launched. By all indications, after the games in the “black redistribution” antagonism can show not only the lower and upper levels, but also the periphery and center. Unless, of course, we consider prosperous Europe and the USA to be the top or center, along with the few that have joined them, or the notorious “golden billion”.

Why the Russian puzzle does not converge


But in fact, Russia now has a rare opportunity to defend, first of all, its moral leadership, which they can call anything from a liberal party. At the moment, the lion's share of our population is frank traditionalists, if you will, even conservatives, which no longer needs confirmation.

The Russian experience of a somewhat anarchist approach to the fight against coronavirus, by all indications, turned out to be very successful, it is possible that due to a combination with extremely harsh concrete measures. In principle, I didn’t even have to fall below the regional levels of power. Moreover, the experience of governor omnipotence, albeit not indisputable, after almost twenty years of scrupulous alignment of the power vertical, is indicative in itself.

Remember that a kind of carte blanche was received in the days of quarantine by many federal departments, and not only by force. It is not entirely clear why the potential of lawmakers of all possible levels was hardly involved. But it cannot be ruled out that the indicative humiliation of Moscow and St. Petersburg liberal city dummies, and through the court, was precisely caused by the need to draw a border where anarchy ends.

Russia, with its electorate slightly more advanced precisely in political terms, has not yet clearly fit into the color (in all senses) protest scenario. She received her vaccination of anarchism, very weak, but she was ready to demand the following. The powerlessness directly related to the lack of money of the local authorities, and the lower the more distinct, it seems, begins to contradict the already elementary common sense. Yes, and the instinct of self-survival, too.

Although it would seem that it was Russia that someone really wanted to prescribe an unscheduled maidan, especially given the tension in a number of peripheral regions. Note - tensions with quite obvious national overtones. But the Russian puzzle somehow does not converge, and it is hoped that it will never converge, because there are still much more unifying values ​​for all the hidden contradictions among the peoples inhabiting our country than there are separating ones.

The bloodless vaccination of anarchism here may also be in demand, already because the situation with the material demarcation and the growing separation of elite clans from the broad masses are fraught with, by all indications, a much greater threat. However, a surprisingly elegant way out of the quarantine deadlock convincingly showed that we also know how to "let off steam" when it is already clearly overbought.

And more about Lenin and “his” cook


In conclusion, let us recall again that true anarchism makes a direct bet precisely on the lower classes — on that very Leninist cook. And Lenin, recalling the cook, hardly relied on the unceremoniously scornful assessments of the common people, which were made by the French enlighteners or German philosophers with their invariable Kinder, Küche, Kirche.

In this sense, the authority for Lenin, along with Marx and Engels, and, perhaps, Plekhanov, was precisely Bakunin and Kropotkin, as well as the founder of Russian populism, Peter Lavrov. And as a real anarchist, Lenin, this leader of the world revolution, was not at all embarrassed and was not afraid of anything in his willingness to rely on the masses.


Bakunin, Kropotkin, Chernyshevsky, Lavrov. Competitors to Marx and Engels?

The great Kropotkin, by the way, met at least twice with Lenin, when he already headed the government of people's commissars. The 75-year-old descendant of the Ruriks, who did not recognize class theory, criticized Lenin. The prince smashed Ilyich not only for the "Red Terror", the Civil War and intolerance of dissidents, but also for the fact that the Bolsheviks are cultivating a new class - the Soviet bureaucracy.

Living in recent years in the provincial Dmitrov, Kropotkin denied Lenin the publication of his collected works, considering the state’s monopoly in the press unacceptable. And this, despite the fee proposed by the leader of the proletariat at that time, for which it was quite possible to move abroad and live there comfortably.

Historians argue that P. Kropotkin was much better in relation to A. Kerensky, at his invitation he even spoke at the State Meeting in August 1917, but categorically refused to join the Provisional Government. The old anarchist told the Minister-Chair that he considered "the craft of the shoe-polisher more honest and useful."

Kropotkin, by the way, was also completely disappointed by many young followers, the very cinema ones whom their "guru" called "rude cheeky young people who took the principle of permissiveness as a basis." Not too inspired by the old man was his acquaintance with the most famous of the anarchist practitioners - Nestor Makhno.

At a meeting with Kropotkin in 1918, the owner of the peasant freemen Gulyai-Polya wanted to ask for advice from someone whom he revered as his teacher, regarding revolutionary activities among Ukrainian peasants. The old prince did not give any advice to Nestor Ivanovich and only lamented that "this issue is associated with great risk ... and only you yourself can solve it."

Nevertheless, there is fairly reliable information that it was Nestor Makhno who kept the Kropotkin family until 1921, when he died, and the "father" escaped from the 1st Horse Army S. Budenny to Romania. It is impossible not to admit that modern anarchism clearly lacks its Kropotkin. But there is a bit too much of a mixed suit there.
Author:
Photos used:
twitter.com/realdonaldtrump
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Cowbra
    Cowbra 14 July 2020 05: 56
    0
    Thanks for the article - great! Finish off a couple of cents ... Finish off - anarchy is actually an extreme version of democracy, BUT! This is, in principle, not to the Anglo-Saxons, nor to the Britos. nor to the tripods, they depict that it seems like democracy for some, and for others - but in fact - a clan system. And the basic principle of anarchy - "the freedom of one person ends where the freedom of another begins" ... Well, tell Blin-Clinton about the attack on Yugoslavia just because he screwed up with secretary Monica Lewinsky. Or BatrAk of ​​Deception is a de-mocrat, yes. Anarchy, like communism, is a utopia, and what is funny, anarchy and communism are quite close in spirit
  2. Finches
    Finches 14 July 2020 05: 56
    +1
    Breaking does not build! The main principle of anarchism ... and what they then offer is the cooperation of people based on their own interests, equality, fraternity, etc. - this is utopia. Without coercion sometimes, a rustic outhouse cannot be built, not like the Colosseum or Isaac! laughing
    1. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 14 July 2020 06: 28
      +7
      Quote: Finches
      Breaking does not build! The main principle of anarchism ... and what they offer later is the cooperation of people based on their own interests, .....laughing
      can you remember 1917
      .... we renounce the old world .....
      but the events of the 90s with the destruction of the soviet took place with me when
      the market will decide everything negative... .....

      But something went wrong, some kind of cooperation didn’t work out?
    2. parusnik
      parusnik 14 July 2020 08: 51
      +2
      Breaking does not build! The main principle of anarchism ...
      .... EBN and Co., in your opinion, are anarchists? ... "Take as much sovereignty as you want" ... quite an anarchist slogan..voucherization of the whole country .. all free owners, what is not anarchism .. And I'll tell you a secret: EBN and Co. they even brought the country to its knees and deprived the country of its sovereignty ... And now it has been lifted from its knees and not long ago acquired sovereignty, just two weeks ago .. laughing
      1. Reptiloid
        Reptiloid 14 July 2020 09: 34
        +2
        Quote: parusnik
        Breaking does not build! The main principle of anarchism ...
        .... EBN & Co. in your opinion are anarchists? ... "Take as much sovereignty as you want" ... quite an anarchist slogan..voucherization of the whole country..all free owners, what is not anarchism ........ laughing
        Time has shown what followed, ------ wars, conflicts, impoverishment of the population and the formation of a new class. Oligarchs. "" The market decided in their favor "" negative Well, another layer of minions for the oligarchs has formed.
    3. Virus-free crown
      Virus-free crown 14 July 2020 15: 53
      -1
      Quote: Finches
      Breaking does not build! The main principle of anarchism ... and what they then offer is the cooperation of people based on their own interests, equality, fraternity, etc. - this is utopia. Without coercion sometimes, a rustic outhouse cannot be built, not like the Colosseum or Isaac! laughing

      read pliz Kropotkin - before that would be so dishonored !!! hi
  3. Far B
    Far B 14 July 2020 05: 58
    14
    Lenin, why did the authors become an anarchist for fear ?! In general, the article contains a lot of controversial points (like, for example, the "graceful" way out of the under-quarantine; just wondering where it is "graceful"). If you go deeper, then for almost every paragraph of the article there is something to object. But this is long, and therefore lazy. So I will briefly note: what is happening now in the States (and at times in some places elsewhere in the West) has very little relation to classical anarchy.
    1. Cowbra
      Cowbra 14 July 2020 06: 10
      -2
      Quote: Dalny V
      Lenin, for what reason did the authors turn into an anarchist for ?!

      Both Lenin and Stalin - were very close to anarchy.
      By the way, the quote from the article given by Joseph Dzhugashvili ... It is not so simple:
      “It’s not a matter of who today the greater or lesser“ mass ”is following, but the essence of the doctrine. If the “doctrine” of the anarchists expresses the truth, then it goes without saying that it will surely pave its way and gather mass around itself. If it is untenable and built on a false basis, it will not last long and will hang in the air. ”
      1. Finches
        Finches 14 July 2020 06: 32
        +1
        Survived! Okay, a tyrant and a bloodsucker, but I have not heard about Stalin’s anarchist - and it’s not surprising that tyranny of power and anarchy are completely mutually exclusive concepts! laughing
        1. Cowbra
          Cowbra 14 July 2020 07: 00
          -8
          And didn’t you hear about the expatriate Dzhugashvili?
          1. Finches
            Finches 14 July 2020 07: 04
            +1
            And what does this have to do with the ideology of anarchism? It’s possible to go to the Code of Criminal Procedure, but money didn’t go into pocket, as in ordinary robbery, but to the needs of the party - under anarchism, nothing can go to the needs of the party, because the party, as an organization, is not recognized by the anarchists! laughing
            1. Cowbra
              Cowbra 14 July 2020 07: 06
              -8
              An-archi, just against the exploiters
              1. Finches
                Finches 14 July 2020 07: 09
                +4
                Anarchy is primarily against power, as such!
                1. Cowbra
                  Cowbra 14 July 2020 07: 21
                  -8
                  Translate the word anarchy, child. Not necessarily against power. An example for. those who give out protests at every meeting of the G-7, so Zhi-seven and power is not close to them, this is short
                  1. Finches
                    Finches 14 July 2020 08: 03
                    +1
                    Man, take it easy on the bends and do not confuse God's gift with fried eggs!
                    1. Cowbra
                      Cowbra 14 July 2020 08: 10
                      -4
                      Okie, I’m just talking about the fact that anarchy is not a denial of power, it’s, how to say ... About the same as all artists - who are the artful covers for Daria Dontsova’s opuses, and all the rest are not artists. Once again - anarchy - for example, it’s absolutely not Makhnovism for example, for Makhno had almost all communists — for example, the chief of staff Belash or Lev Zadov, aka Zodov ... Anarchists or what?)
                      1. Finches
                        Finches 14 July 2020 08: 13
                        +1
                        Anarchy, the absence of any control - Ozhegov's dictionary hi
                      2. Cowbra
                        Cowbra 14 July 2020 08: 36
                        -3
                        Again. it is the management of each specific person - himself. Once again - by myself. not someone else’s power. it's just that they often talk about anarchy as a destructive topic. But by and large it is not destructive - the anarchist does not need to destroy the power of a draw. She is simply indifferent to the anarchist
                      3. Finches
                        Finches 14 July 2020 08: 41
                        0
                        And Ozhegov, you, no decree ... laughing
                      4. Cowbra
                        Cowbra 14 July 2020 08: 50
                        -4
                        Ozhegov is a political scientist? And the compiler of the dictionary) On the topic of example anarchism is famously))) What does Ozhegov have for anarcho-individualism or nihilism or anarcho-communism and the seizure of the means of production? Nothing?
                      5. Finches
                        Finches 14 July 2020 09: 16
                        +2
                        And what has to do with the types of anarchy - we are talking about the classic definition of the word "anarchy" ... The article does not say anything about its varieties! You touched on this topic, I objected to you. He pointed out that you are not quite right ... You refuse to admit it, letting go into unnecessary reasoning!
                        Sometimes a student, instead of answering specifically the question with a clear definition of the phenomenon accepted in science, starts to wind up around him and only he understands sophisms ... And then he is offended that he rolled two balls! laughing
                      6. Cowbra
                        Cowbra 14 July 2020 09: 38
                        -4
                        Ozhegov is just a linguist. It's a lot, but a lot - on a different topic
                      7. Finches
                        Finches 14 July 2020 09: 45
                        +1
                        God be with him, and with Ozhegov, and with the anarchists! I’d better tell you a political anecdote - for which under Joseph Vissarionovich it was possible to go to master Kolyma, and today it is possible, freedom of speech and democracy - almost anarchy - the mother of order! ... laughing

                        -My husband does not recognize power at all!
                        -Anarchist, or what?
                        -What anarchist is there! He is a deputy ...
                      8. Cowbra
                        Cowbra 15 July 2020 04: 48
                        -1
                        "I am a lot" - so that you can even get close - who is a baptized anarchist? And you - who are you - teach me
                      9. The comment was deleted.
                      10. The comment was deleted.
                      11. The comment was deleted.
  • Egoza
    Egoza 14 July 2020 06: 47
    10
    Quote: Cowbra
    quoted in the article by Joseph Dzhugashvili ... It is not so simple:

    Well, comrade I.V. Stalin did not write nonsense. No wonder his works are now actively studied at US universities. (Lenin too)
    1. MstislavHrabr
      MstislavHrabr 14 July 2020 12: 46
      +1
      When will we print them again and send them to the libraries?
      1. your1970
        your1970 1 August 2020 15: 44
        0
        Quote: MstislavHrabr
        When will we print them again and send them to the libraries?

        There are still old ones ... They are not written off because of their good condition - they were rarely read in the USSR ...
  • Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 14 July 2020 06: 35
    +4
    Quote: Far In
    Lenin, why did the authors become an anarchist for fear ?! In general, the article contains a lot of controversial points (like, for example, the "graceful" way out of the under-quarantine; just wondering where it is "graceful"). .......

    And not only among these authors was Lenin called an anarchist, he met similar in several modern books.
    About the word --- "" graceful "" ---- sarcasm negative ?
  • Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 14 July 2020 06: 02
    +1
    Do not shoot the anarchist
    Why? And if you really need to? repeat
    In the US today, punishing for specific crimes is boring and not productive. repeat Need an idea - a stigma! Nationalisms, racisms, fascisms, terrorism, etc. will not work. The masses have an idea of ​​what they eat. Another thing is anarchism, the word is not good, abusive. Under such a marinade, you can eat all your enemies. Here are the satraps and introduce the well-forgotten old into circulation. recourse
    1. Cowbra
      Cowbra 14 July 2020 07: 03
      -1
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Nationalisms, racisms, fascisms, terrorism, etc. will not work. The masses have an idea of ​​what they eat. Another thing is anarchism, the word is not good, abusive.

      Beautifully said)
    2. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 14 July 2020 07: 14
      +4
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      anarchism, the word is not good, abusive.

      Anarchy is the mother of order.
      An anarchist pulled off my aunt’s short fur coat from me.
      Ah, Mr. Kropotkin taught him that.
  • Sancho_SP
    Sancho_SP 14 July 2020 06: 04
    0
    As it turns out too propaganda.

    Done, not the anarchists (in the classical sense) are insulting in the states, but some disgusting leftists, "Marxists".

    Anarchists suggest that the state disappear or, at least, minimize its influence.

    Left-wingers, on the other hand, demand from the state the expansion of the “rights” of the holders to the detriment of the leading class. And this is exactly what is happening in the United States.
  • parusnik
    parusnik 14 July 2020 06: 20
    +5
    Well, don’t shoot the anarchist, he plays as best he can ... smile
    1. Tugarin
      Tugarin 14 July 2020 06: 46
      15
      Quote: parusnik
      do not shoot at the anarchist, he plays as best he can.

      laughing Then it’s better:
      Do not shoot at the anarchist, he walks as best he can smile
  • Baloo
    Baloo 14 July 2020 06: 30
    11
    Events in the USA - rampant anarchy ??? belay The babosy at the extras organizers from trampampam competitors will end and everyone will calm down. yes Groups of financial tycoons grappled with the redistribution of spheres of influence and cash flows. Who benefits from 9/11? Has anyone analyzed the movements on the stock exchanges, say, for a couple of weeks, when "electricians" walked the towers, and the new owners reinsured the towers at once in as many as two dozen companies? And while the carnival continues, there is no end in sight.
  • nikvic46
    nikvic46 14 July 2020 06: 31
    +2
    America is far away. But where does such close attention to their riots come from? After all, everything seems to be fine with us. And even the protectors of capitalism are praising this system. It's just that America saw their future. Either socialism or capitalism. There is no middle link. By the way, when "capitalism is turned to the benefit of society, this is socialism." Nothing in the world changes. All this was when it already happened.
    1. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 14 July 2020 07: 22
      +1
      Quote: nikvic46
      "capitalism is directed to the benefit of society, this is socialism"
      repeat And exactly what happens? Capitalism is aimed at its growth and its development, and the state can only control it. to benefit society
      Is it like dictating rules to the capitalists? fool So power in the cap. the state of the capitalists and they write the laws by which stupid lives common name. recourse
    2. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 14 July 2020 07: 24
      +1
      Quote: nikvic46
      America is far away. But where does such close attention to their riots come from? ........ They just saw their future in America ...... about.
      negative laughing lol We saw the ideal, the subject of worship!
      But it turns out not so ideal!
  • Gato
    Gato 14 July 2020 08: 03
    +6
    And what about anarchism? Theoretically, the ultimate goals of anarchism and communism are the same - building a classless society that excludes the exploitation of man by man.
    What does all this have to do with the states? An old history, like the world, takes place there - one imperious group wants to demolish another with the help of marginal plebs. And under what slogans - anarchism, Marxism, homosexuality, democracy - it does not matter at all. The ruling class as a whole will not suffer.
    1. Gato
      Gato 14 July 2020 08: 25
      +1
      And in general, the article lacks colorful illustrations! fellow
      1. Avior
        Avior 14 July 2020 08: 38
        -1
        And how without it?

        smile
        1. Gato
          Gato 14 July 2020 08: 46
          +4
          Cheto good mood in the morning. Then this - blacks do not understand:


          Pay attention - in what language is the inscription.
      2. Phil77
        Phil77 14 July 2020 12: 04
        -1
        Good afternoon! And you can’t do without it!
        * ... mother anarchy,
        dad is a glass of port. *
        Chayf. laughing hi laughing
        1. Sergey M. Karasev
          Sergey M. Karasev 14 July 2020 15: 54
          +2
          Quote: Phil77
          Good afternoon! And you can’t do without it!
          * ... mother anarchy,
          dad is a glass of port. *
          Chayf. laughing hi laughing

          Is it a tea? Or maybe, all the same, Kino?
          [media = http: // https: //youtu.be/lTo2H9UhtYI? t = 31]
          1. Phil77
            Phil77 14 July 2020 16: 32
            0
            Quote: Sergey Mikhailovich Karasev
            Is it a tea? Or maybe, all the same, Kino?

            Of course you're right! Song 86 years old, from the album * Night *. My apologies! hi
  • Avior
    Avior 14 July 2020 08: 14
    +1
    The authors make a fundamental mistake at the very beginning
    As you know, in the US, most laws of individual states have an advantage over federal

    In fact, everything is exactly the opposite, as indicated in article 6 of the US Constitution
    This constitution and the laws of the United States, which will be established to enforce it, as well as all treaties concluded by the United States, must be the supreme law of the country, and judges of each state must obey them, at least in the constitution and laws of individual states there are contradictions to them.

    https://ru.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Конституция_США
    1. your1970
      your1970 1 August 2020 15: 53
      0
      Quote: Avior
      This constitution and laws of the United States to be established in pursuance of it,

      This refers to constitutional laws. If state law not constitutional, it may well prevail over US law.
      For example, if the law establishes the acceptable size of the sign on the store (conditionally!), Then the state law may well establish other sizes. And state law will be enforced ....
      1. Avior
        Avior 1 August 2020 17: 38
        0
        Is there a federal law on signage sizing?
        Such questions cannot be discussed conditionally
        It is quite possible that in the federal it is stipulated
        1. your1970
          your1970 1 August 2020 19: 18
          0
          Quite enough - the pursuit of criminals to the state line. I managed to escape - that's all ...
          In a neighboring state, this crime may not be punishable. In some of the states, you cannot save naked women from fires - it is punishable ...
          1. Avior
            Avior 1 August 2020 19: 21
            0
            I see no contradictions with federal laws, to be honest
            1. your1970
              your1970 1 August 2020 21: 58
              0
              The police will catch the fugitive regardless of the territory of the region / region - the Criminal Code is the same for the entire federation ...
              They have up to the state border - different laws in different states + case law
              1. Avior
                Avior 2 August 2020 07: 20
                0
                I meant with their federal laws, not Russian
          2. Avior
            Avior 1 August 2020 19: 51
            0
            It is quite possible that there is a legislative separation of powers between the states and the federal level, so this question is simply not worth it.
  • Etherion
    Etherion 14 July 2020 08: 31
    +3
    "The Russian experience is a somewhat anarchic approach to the fight against coronavirus" - that's exactly what is anarchist. Author, you have not yet noticed what damage to the authority of the authorities in the "lower classes" was caused by this quarantine? Crooked enforcement of quarantine measures (excessive restrictions that respected 50/50, queues for passes in Moscow), lack of real help to business and ordinary people.

    "Remember that, during the days of quarantine, many federal departments, and not only the security forces, received a kind of carte blanche." - "something like" - yes, before the first arrests and videos on YouTube with children and tantrums.

    "Russia, with its slightly more politically advanced electorate, clearly does not fit into the colored (in every sense) protest scenario." - Well, I will find fault with "political advancement." Do the events of last week in Circassia hint to you?

    Distort the facts to please your idea.
  • Gato
    Gato 14 July 2020 08: 35
    +2
    the “father” himself escaped from the 1st Cavalry Army S. Budenny

    He didn’t run away, but retreated with fights am . And part of his army went to Budyonny. You don’t say that Budyonny then escaped from Poland?
  • smaug78
    smaug78 14 July 2020 08: 38
    +3
    Authors, you would first study what anarchism is, and then you would write an article. And you don’t know anything, but write ..
  • Was mammoth
    Was mammoth 14 July 2020 08: 54
    +4
    "... modern anarchism lacks its own Kropotkin."
    As well as modern Marxism, its own Lenin and Stalin. " wink
    Even at school, at one time they gave the foundations of philosophy, who now offhand will say at least about the main directions of thought? That is why political labels are so easily "molded". wink
  • BAI
    BAI 14 July 2020 09: 43
    +2
    usually sheriff, and not the mayor, was in his town and the nearest district, as they say, and the king, and God, and the military commander. Even if he himself implicitly obeyed the sheriff and was afraid of the judge or the district attorney.

    Did the sheriff obey the sheriff?
    1. depressant
      depressant 14 July 2020 11: 23
      +3
      Yeah. I also drew attention to this sub-version and even for some time tried to comprehend it)))
  • Polymer
    Polymer 15 July 2020 11: 59
    0
    Competitors to Marx and Engels?

    Bakunin was just a real competitor to Marx, which led to the split of the First International. But Marxism then won, and anarchism lost.
  • Zloyxirurg
    Zloyxirurg 3 August 2020 22: 30
    0
    An amazingly bombastic article. Precisely verbally. There are so many complex phrases, a bunch of incomprehensible complex sentences, the meaning of the article veiled in many letters.
    Very difficult to read.
    Very awkward writing style.
    Write easier. You are not doing satire here like.
    And analytics of politics, geopolitics and so on ...
    Good luck to you.