Military Review

The network has a video of shooting attack aircraft Su-25SM3

32
The network has a video of shooting attack aircraft Su-25SM3

A video of shooting the Su-25SM3 VKS of Russia attack aircraft appeared on the Web. A video with relevant content on YouTube was published by the Zvezda channel.


The video frames show a view from the cockpit of an attack aircraft during the launch of missile attacks on a conditional enemy, as well as a group flight of Su-25SM3 aircraft. The description of the video does not say where the exercises of the Russian modernized attack aircraft took place, and when the firing took place.

Su-25M3 is a further modification of the Su-25CM attack aircraft. On the upgraded machines installed a digital display, which displays the ground and air situation, installed a new fire control system and satellite navigation GLONASS. The combat effectiveness of the machine has improved threefold compared with previous modifications. The aircraft is capable of hitting ground targets from a considerable distance, without entering into visual contact with a target, but only by coordinates.


The aircraft is designed to destroy small-sized mobile and stationary ground objects, as well as low-speed air targets.

Earlier it was reported that up to the level of the Su-25СМ3 it is planned to upgrade the entire existing fleet of Su-25 attack aircraft, including the Su-25СМ.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Klingon
    Klingon 13 July 2020 09: 03
    -7
    Unlike the A-10, the Super-Rook is still not able to work normally on tanks without entering the enemy’s air defense zone. amazing At one time, the Su-25T version was stolen, and working on tanks with the help of the X-25/29 is an inadmissible luxury.
    1. Civil
      Civil 13 July 2020 09: 05
      +4
      Quote: Klingon
      Unlike the A-10, the Super-Rook is still not able to work normally on tanks without entering the enemy’s air defense zone. amazing At one time, the Su-25T version was stolen, and working on tanks with the help of the X-25/29 is an inadmissible luxury.

      Which is more expensive? Tank or rocket?
      1. smart ass
        smart ass 13 July 2020 21: 26
        0
        How they pulled bunks 40 years ago and continue
    2. Gloomy skeptic
      Gloomy skeptic 13 July 2020 09: 14
      0
      Or maybe tanks are not his profile? There are two attack helicopters, a bunch of ATGMs of different stripes, and tanks can defeat the adversary’s tanks!
      1. Grazdanin
        Grazdanin 13 July 2020 09: 56
        +4
        Quote: Grim Skeptic
        Or maybe tanks are not his profile?

        This type of aircraft is designed to combat tanks. This is his main role.
        1. Gloomy skeptic
          Gloomy skeptic 13 July 2020 10: 07
          0
          Quote: Grazdanin
          This type of aircraft is designed to combat tanks. This is his main role.

          This was so in the 1960s, and since then almost everything has changed on the battlefield. And praise to our designers and the military that they see these changes and adjust the existing equipment for them.
          1. Grazdanin
            Grazdanin 13 July 2020 10: 09
            +1
            Yes. Now the main weapon of the Su-25 is NARs and free-falling bombs used on the “eye” evolution on the face, yeah.
            1. Gloomy skeptic
              Gloomy skeptic 13 July 2020 10: 21
              -2
              Well, yes, well, yes, some Serdyukov’s are sitting in headquarters and the territory of the Russian Federation is the smallest in the world, where we are to Puerto Rico — that’s where the power and the mind are !!! Maybe someone in the world has the best attack aircraft? Point to the ignorant, be so kind!
              1. Grazdanin
                Grazdanin 13 July 2020 10: 28
                -2
                Quote: Grim Skeptic
                Maybe someone in the world has the best attack aircraft? Point to the ignorant, be so kind!


                A-10
                1. Jack O'Neill
                  Jack O'Neill 13 July 2020 17: 44
                  0
                  A-10

                  In general, it’s funny that even the A-10A is better, not to mention the A-10C. And the A-10A is no longer there, all are patched to the level of A-10C.
                  1. Grazdanin
                    Grazdanin 13 July 2020 17: 48
                    0
                    No need to say. The principle of “new give birth” works for us.
            2. Cyril G ...
              Cyril G ... 13 July 2020 10: 56
              0
              Su-25SM and in our country all of the Su-25s were almost driven through modern, received SVP-24/25
    3. 5-9
      5-9 13 July 2020 09: 54
      0
      You should take a look at the range, size and price of Maverick and the air defense range before writing this .... in general, helicopters are better for this
    4. Grazdanin
      Grazdanin 13 July 2020 09: 58
      0
      NARS and free-falling bombs are our everything.
    5. sivuch
      sivuch 13 July 2020 10: 43
      +4
      Then for a start it would be necessary to decide - what is the enemy’s air defense zone (and who is this enemy)
      1. Grazdanin
        Grazdanin 13 July 2020 11: 13
        0
        This refers to the near zone 3-4 km in height, 6-10 km in range.
        1. sivuch
          sivuch 13 July 2020 12: 34
          0
          Is that in the sense of Thor? So they are not very at all. And at the near border, i.e. 6 km is quite possible to shoot S-25L. She, by the way, is not very expensive
          1. Grazdanin
            Grazdanin 13 July 2020 12: 42
            -1
            MANPADS that type Avenger, anti-aircraft guns. Tor all the same short-range air defense systems and similar systems is extremely small.
            You can shoot, it’s hard to get there.
            1. sivuch
              sivuch 13 July 2020 16: 24
              +1
              And what is easy in this life? sad
              But they write that when creating the S-25L, Tochmash completely lived up to its name: the firing range, compared with the original NAR, more than doubled from 3 to 7 km, and the accuracy was six times: from 20-30 m at launch NAR from a three-kilometer distance up to 5-7 m when starting the S-25L from a distance of 7 km. High-precision weapons, which became the S-25L, also compares favorably with lower cost, ease of storage, preparation for launch and operation. The modified S-25LD, while maintaining the same dimensions and mass, provided an increase in performance: when tested on the Su-25T attack aircraft, the circular probable deviation did not exceed 1,2 m, and most armored targets were destroyed by a direct hit.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Poetry
    Poetry 13 July 2020 09: 18
    +6
    In terms of vitality, the Rooks were not equal. Earlier, at least. Now I do not know.
  4. Eldorado
    Eldorado 13 July 2020 09: 37
    +2
    Work, brothers! wink
  5. alexmach
    alexmach 13 July 2020 10: 06
    +1
    They fired again with unguided missiles.
    1. Grazdanin
      Grazdanin 13 July 2020 10: 10
      -2
      There is simply no other.
      1. alexmach
        alexmach 13 July 2020 10: 27
        +1
        Yes, there were options for the same S-25 with laser guidance.
        1. Grazdanin
          Grazdanin 13 July 2020 10: 29
          -2
          In tests, it’s possible that the series is definitely not in the troops.
          1. viktorR
            viktorR 13 July 2020 11: 25
            +3
            What are you doing? S-25L was still used in Chechnya ... And in the army, it’s been about 87 years since
    2. sivuch
      sivuch 13 July 2020 12: 38
      0
      In the sense - S-25L? They are manageable
      1. alexmach
        alexmach 13 July 2020 12: 54
        0
        In the sense - S-25L

        Not at all like "L"
        S-25L

        And they shot like C-25-0
        1. sivuch
          sivuch 13 July 2020 14: 25
          +1
          Yes, at least the leader was grinning pointed-nosed.
          1. alexmach
            alexmach 13 July 2020 15: 41
            0
            And at the second, packages with C-8 were suspended.
  6. Klingon
    Klingon 13 July 2020 10: 06
    +3
    I have long stopped watching TC star videos, pathos without any critical component. Everything is just super duper. And the leader who does not know how to distinguish tanks wassat
    1. TatarinSSSR
      TatarinSSSR 13 July 2020 21: 25
      0
      I used to love, and then how the all-victorious and super-pretentious "Military Acceptance" appeared with a nasal presenter, through the word inserting "who has no analogue in the world!", Stopped looking.
  7. The comment was deleted.