Military Review

BDK "Peter Morgunov" reached the final stage of sea trials

22
BDK "Peter Morgunov" reached the final stage of sea trials

The first serial BDK of the project 11711 "Peter Morgunov" resumed passing the tests, once again entering the Baltic Sea. According to TASS with reference to the representative of the Yantar Shipyard, this stage is final.


According to the representative of the enterprise, "Peter Morgunov" reached the final stage of factory sea trials, which should be completed by mid-July. Whether state tests will be carried out in the future or whether they were combined with running ones is not known. Also, so far nothing has been reported on the timing of the adoption of the BDK fleet.

The only reliable information at the moment came from the Ministry of Defense. According to her, BDK "Peter Morgunov" should take part in the Main Naval Parade, which will be held July 26 in St. Petersburg and Kronstadt in honor of the Day of the Russian Navy.

According to the plans announced earlier, the BDK was supposed to finish sea trials by mid-April and immediately switch to the state, so that in May it would join the fleet. However, the tests of the ship dragged on, in early June he was returned to the "Yantar" to carry out finishing work.

BDK "Peter Morgunov" is the second ship of the project 11711 and the first serial after the lead BDK "Ivan Gren". Laid down in June 2015 and launched on May 25, 2018. The construction of the ship was carried out with delays, since it was necessary to correct the mistakes made in the design of the lead ship.

BDK 11711 is able to accommodate 13 tanks or more than 30 armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles. The ship also provides for the deployment of a reinforced battalion of the Marine Corps, as well as the temporary basing of various types of ship helicopters. The ship has a cruising range of 4 thousand nautical miles, which allows you to perform tasks in the far sea zone.
Photos used:
PSZ "Amber"
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Borik
    Borik 10 July 2020 11: 58
    +6
    Let's hope that after the holiday he will nevertheless become part of the fleet.
  2. sav
    sav 10 July 2020 12: 17
    +15
    The long-awaited replenishment for the Navy.
    1. Fast_mutant
      Fast_mutant 10 July 2020 13: 24
      -5
      11711 ... Displacement 5000 t (standard) ....
      5000 tons in 5 years ....
      1000 tons per year ...
      3 tons per day.
      Cool!
      Was there ONE man doing it?
      1. Fast_mutant
        Fast_mutant 10 July 2020 13: 29
        -2
        https://www.if24.ru/rossijskie-oligarhi-nachali-skupat-zamki-i-yahty/ Так, добавлю чуток... И я не завидую. Мне за державу обидно!
      2. Fast_mutant
        Fast_mutant 10 July 2020 13: 37
        -2
        Strange, but the first comment is cut. "Bit off" 80 percent of the message! and the meaning has changed completely!
        1. Fast_mutant
          Fast_mutant 10 July 2020 13: 41
          +5
          The outflow of capital from Russia has exceeded $ 25 billion since the beginning of the year.
          Just to understand how much dough it is "in commodity" terms ....
          Qatar ordered 100 gas carriers from Korea (such a little boat). Length - 345 m, width - 55 m, side height - 27 m (almost a 10-storey building, and this is only BOARD). The transaction amount is US $ 19,2 billion. That is, "our guys" steal 20 (!) Of these ships EVERY MONTH!
          According to experts, the frigate of the project 22350 costs 400-420 million dollars. Given the latest weapons that are currently being developed, its real price may increase to 500 million .... Displacement - 5000 tons, length - 135 m, width - 16 m
          Q-Max costs $ 192 million .... Displacement -? tons (not found), length - 345 m, width - 55 m, side height - 27 m
          2 times cheaper with, most likely, much more complicated manufacturing and with sizes 9 times larger!
          I believe that launching a ship with a displacement of up to 20 thousand. tons for Russia should be a routine, not a holiday!
          1. antivirus
            antivirus 10 July 2020 14: 43
            0
            capital withdrawal is both Coca-Cola pays itself in the USA, and chemistry for agricultural production and bulls (?) and other profits from past investments - remember, "investment attractive ...." .... "passed international forum, signed agreements on foreign investment "
          2. lucul
            lucul 10 July 2020 15: 05
            +2
            The outflow of capital from Russia has exceeded $ 25 billion since the beginning of the year

            Have you forgotten how, under Yeltsin, $ 200 billion a year was withdrawn? )))
          3. Ratmir_Ryazan
            Ratmir_Ryazan 10 July 2020 19: 14
            +1
            I believe that launching a ship with a displacement of up to 20 thousand. tons for Russia should be a routine, not a holiday!


            Can you try it yourself ?! It’s good to grind rubbish with your tongue, and carry nonsense about what and how much should be built.

            And the outflow of capital is an economic term, not theft !!! In Russia, many people buy imported goods from products to airplanes, foreign companies that sell these goods for rubles, then transfer money to dollars and send from Russia - this is what capital withdrawal is !!!

            Look at your purchases, all that you spent on imported goods - from washing powder to a car, you yourself brought abroad, and in currency !!!
      3. Fast_mutant
        Fast_mutant 10 July 2020 13: 51
        +4
        By the way, I don't understand why even in this interpretation of the "minus" message? Someone who minusanul thinks that such a ship is normal in 5 (!) Years? He's a SERIAL! Moreover, the second building. And only 5 kilotons. To build it, you don't need superdocks, supercranes, or supertechnologies! It's JUST a ship. In general, that is a SMALL ship! I once got up to serve on a ship of 24 thousand tons. This is more difficult to build, but, apparently, we are better able to drop the cranes on the "oldies" and heat the docks! And in order to somehow smear negative emotions, joyful messages appear about the construction of "kids"! True, I will add very much, like air, necessary!
        1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
          Sidor Amenpodestovich 10 July 2020 15: 18
          +1
          Quote: Fast_mutant
          By the way, I don't understand why even in this interpretation of the "minus" message?

          You, what you wrote is certainly true. But about the time of construction, and about the outflow of capital and VO in the articles and comments, and generally everywhere was said a thousand million times.
          Well, they build for a long time, well, they take it out. Can we somehow influence this? .. And why then arrange such a multi-exclamation indignation in the comments? Steam let off? I hope you feel better.
  3. Eldorado
    Eldorado 10 July 2020 12: 24
    +2
    Would be faster in the fleet! Will he go CSF?
  4. rusboris
    rusboris 10 July 2020 12: 37
    0
    In a low-intensity war, the Navy needs more of these ships. And the ships of fire support for the landing are needed. Frigates and corvettes for this purpose are generally about nothing. For a military blockade of the ports of coastal states not loyal to Russia, a modern reincarnation of armored artillery cruisers of the "Diana" type, 1895 is needed. An excellent partner for the project 11711 large landing craft. Even the range is the same. Artillery, 8 barrels 152mm. Adequate armor. Sustainable air defense and anti-aircraft defense. This proposal is not from "alternative history" but for modern low intensity warfare. Delivery in the interests of the Marine Corps, 10 tons of high-explosive shells at a distance of 40 km from the coast is a serious argument. Indeed, well, do not let the "barmaley calibers" go.
  5. antivirus
    antivirus 10 July 2020 14: 38
    -1
    how slowly the wings and "membranes between the fingers" grow in the Navy.
    the sixth sense does not manifest itself quickly
  6. Ros 56
    Ros 56 10 July 2020 14: 39
    0
    And how many should be eventually built? Maybe someone knows a lot of plans?
  7. Fast_mutant
    Fast_mutant 10 July 2020 15: 39
    -3
    Quote: lucul
    Have you forgotten how, under Yeltsin, $ 200 billion a year was withdrawn? )))

    Do not forget. And now, rejoice that not 200 brought?
  8. Fast_mutant
    Fast_mutant 10 July 2020 15: 41
    -5
    Quote: Sidor Amenpodestovich
    I hope you feel better.

    If you are silent, it will only get worse. It is necessary to convey your dissatisfaction with the authorities. Otherwise, if we are silent, then everything suits. Start small.
  9. Fast_mutant
    Fast_mutant 10 July 2020 15: 44
    -4
    Quote: antivirus
    the withdrawal of capital is Coca-Cola pays itself in the United States

    I don’t think so. Since he is not a financier. But “conclusion” logically means “conclusion”, that is, nothing in return! And payment under a contract or profit is, kmk, is completely different. If there are specialists, let them explain.
  10. uvxghk
    uvxghk 10 July 2020 16: 33
    0
    These are the ones to build
    1. Ratmir_Ryazan
      Ratmir_Ryazan 10 July 2020 19: 15
      +1
      These are the ones to build


      Just 2 of these under 25 tons of displacement recently laid in Kerch. Are you satisfied ?!
  11. Fast_mutant
    Fast_mutant 12 July 2020 07: 57
    0
    Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
    you yourself brought abroad

    Your rudeness only confirms my innocence. When there is nothing to argue with argument, they are transferred to the individual.
  12. Fast_mutant
    Fast_mutant 12 July 2020 08: 54
    0
    Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
    Are you satisfied ?!

    Until they enter the fleet, I am NOT satisfied. Too many promises. All our successes in the future tense.