UN found murder of Iranian general Suleymani illegal

Morgan Ortagus, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of State, sharply criticized the United Nations, which in its report recognized the killing of US Iranian General Kassem Suleimani as an unlawful act. It is about the elimination by the US military of the Al-Quds forces commander under the IRGC, which occurred on January 3 at Baghdad International Airport.

It is reported by Al Jazeera.

A spokeswoman for the US State Department attacked the UN on Wednesday with sharp criticism:

A special kind of intellectual dishonesty is required in order to publish a report condemning the US, acting in self-defense, and at the same time, with the whitening of the odious past of General Suleimani, one of the deadliest terrorists in the world.

Ortagus called the UN report biased and detrimental to human rights. She stated that the actions of the United Nations are tantamount to issuing licenses to terrorists. The spokeswoman added that the United States did the right thing to resign from the UN Human Rights Council.

Earlier, UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions, Agnes Kallamard, described the killing of Kassem Suleimani as illegal and violating the Charter of this international organization and international law. In her report, it was said that the actions of the Iranian general did not pose a direct threat to people's lives, therefore, the decision of the United States to eliminate it was illegal.

The murder committed by the United States in another country and recognized by the UN as illegal ... I wonder how many countries will now decide to announce the expulsion of American diplomats?

Comments

[NEXUS]

UN found murder of Iranian general Suleymani illegal

But what, murder for the UN may be in some form legal?

[Far B]

Apparently yes. According to Hussein and Gaddafi, nothing like this was heard. Know, there was a mustache of norms. From their point of view

[Kurare]

Quote: Dalny V

According to Hussein and Gaddafi, nothing like this was heard.

Saddam Hussein was "sort of" tried. And Gaddafi "sort of" is not the Americans, but the democratic representatives of the Libyan people during the so-called. "revolution".
Those. both managed to remove with the wrong hands.

[Starover_Z]

Ortagus called the UN report biased and prejudicial to human rights. She stated that United Nations actions were tantamount to issuing licenses to terrorists. A spokeswoman added that The United States did the right thing to quit the UN Human Rights Council.

So, since you left the Council, why raise it, champions of all kinds of convenient rights ?!

[NIKN]

Quote: NEXUS

But what, murder for the UN may be in some form legal?

No, there’s a problem about licenses.

She stated that United Nations actions are tantamount to issuing licenses to terrorists.

Without a license, you can only hunt America, but not others; Again, the United States has been put on a par with mortals, which is a shame. Yes, say so

A special kind of intellectual dishonesty is required to publish a report condemning the United States

I get the idea that intelligence is not acceptable for them either. Now, if as if their lack of intellect was absent, then it is still bearable.

[iouris]

Quote: NEXUS

But what, murder for the UN may be in some form legal?

Once the question is put up for discussion, it can.

[credo]

Quote: iouris

Quote: NEXUS

But what, murder for the UN may be in some form legal?

Once the question is put up for discussion, it can.

It’s not at all clear what the US representative took care of so much if her country had previously wiped her feet about the UN and spat on this organization from a large bell tower when it was necessary to invade a particular country.

[vik669]

To the village, ah! Wow! Where is this office located and who sets the tone there!

[Doccor18]

... to publish a report condemning the US acting in self-defense ...

In Baghdad ... the United States is defending itself right around the world, and they, the "poor", are being attacked and attacked all over the world ...

[Pavel57]

And the right of the Anglo-Saxons to kill?

[Mountain shooter]

And the US does not recognize the state as a terrorist? Well, then ...

[Boratsagdiev]

Oh, the Yankees don't give a damn about it.
At one time, there was a "non-public agreement" (WWII) not to touch the high-ranking military (not to hunt on purpose), so the Americans carried out a special operation to destroy the Japanese general. Like it happened by accident.

[Elephant]

The Yankees are completely unbelted. Sooner or later it will be God's punishment for all atrocities.

[Boris55]

UN found murder of Iranian general Suleymani illegal

And what were the sanctions against the United States?
By the way, the UN is the only body that is endowed with this right.

[alone]

Quote: Boris55

What sanctions did the US take?
By the way, the UN is the only body that is endowed with this right.

What are the sanctions? The United States has the right to veto .. That’s why all UN decisions are idle talk.

[svp67]

UN found murder of Iranian general Suleymani illegal

and????? And that's all ??? Is it actually an act of international terrorism? This is not a "highlike" for you ...

[rotmistr60]

A special kind of intellectual dishonesty is required.

Who is singing about intellectual dishonesty? For such an event, the Americans did not recall the definition that is almost always used in international relations. What, what, and shamelessness, cynicism, aggressiveness they have in the first place. The UN has recognized the killing illegal, but the Americans do not care about it. They even managed to blame the UN.

[Wedmak]

The murder committed by the United States in another country and recognized by the UN as unlawful ...

Well ... And what will you do now USA? The useless organization of talking heads?

[zwlad]

The murder committed by the United States in another country and recognized by the UN as illegal ... I wonder how many countries will now decide to announce the expulsion of American diplomats?

Not at all.
However, since the murder is unlawful (although, as a murder can generally be legal), it is necessary to conduct an international investigation, and then the perpetrators to trial.
I doubt the similar investigation.

[nobody111body]

the laughter of this stunned UN desk; when Israel also destroyed the Lebanese general staff, and now Iranian and Syrian; the next we are the Chinese and the Indians, ears clap? hence the Russian generals will soon be kirdyk; but if the bandit of the Israeli air force Norkin, the Iranians catch and eliminate, then you can do without any UN, but for now, rudeness is booming

[Zaurbek]

Following, as the Americans like to do, personal sanctions against the UN leadership and against those who voted "for" and the revocation of their American visa. And everyone will shut up.

[Cyril G ...]

Or there will be a new UN, moreover, on neutral territory. There the island will be redeemed to them in Atlantic and business with the end.

[Zaurbek]

I'm afraid that the status quo will not arise without a new .... The League of Nations ended with the beginning of WWII, and then the UN arose in new realities.

[Kerensky]

UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions

Here is the post!
Is there no subcontractor there?

[notingem]

There is but everything is busy.

[parusnik]

Here is an example of how American law prevails over international ...

[pexotinec]

And then what? By yelling at screaming at the UN and all? Where are the sanctions? US recognition as a terrorist state? Showcases!

[Svetlana]

Quote: NEXUS

UN found murder of Iranian general Suleymani illegal

But what, murder for the UN may be in some form legal?

Yes maybe. Execution of criminals, of the same Chikatilo, for example, is murder by law (legal)

[Dmitry Makarov]

But personally, I admit it is legal- The destruction by Iranian missiles of the American military base in Iraq.

[sav]

The UN recognized that this will end.

[Fitter65]

I wonder how many countries will now decide to announce the expulsion of American diplomats?

One thing, and even then not American, but UNOs from the USA.

[andrew42]

A new fable. How bunnies and squirrels judged the wolf. Until the American generals and colonels of the CIA / NSA start poking at the toilets, at least bash for bash / tit for an eye, such American "special operations" will only whet the appetites of the outlaws from the States. Permissiveness is a dangerous thing.

[Boris ⁣ Shaver]

A special kind of intellectual dishonesty is required to publish a report condemning the United States

They have already been completely blown away if they seriously make such statements.

[seacap]

Quote: Dalny V

Apparently yes.

And the Serbian leaders in general were killed right in court without a sentence, also according to the law? And direct aggression and "democratic bombing" of sovereign countries and the assassination of their leaderships, not to mention secret and not very prisons, something there neither laws, nor the UN even with a stretch does not smell like the money of the most "peaceful and democratic" country in a world for which "Nuremberg 2" has long been not crying, but crying in hysterics .. how much they brought evil and shed blood, committed crimes against humanity, so the Germans are simply foolish children compared to them.

[Virus-free crown]

As for me - so the killing of ANY official representative of country 1 in the territory of country 2 country 3 is APRIORI illegal !!!
General Suleymani is an officer !!! Iranian countries - not a fleeing hiding criminal !!! Arrived in a third country on an official visit !!! And his murder is terrorism !!! Who would not be Sulejmani !!!

[Dikson]

Lord, who writes such headlines ???! "Lawful murder" ... Do you compose on purpose so that people write more comments?

[APASUS]

When Americans need it, they do not have the status of an international airport, not really an official invitation from the authorities. Moreover, most of all in the world, they teach everyone to observe rights and laws

[muham]

For everyone sighing about the UN: "The UN Commission to Investigate the Crimes Committed in Syria presented a report on the period from November 2019 to June 2020. As the document states, both supporters and opponents of the regime are guilty of war crimes. In total, the commission investigated 52 episodes. 47 cases refer to the actions of the regime of Bashar al-Assad and Russia supporting him. "
And what shall we say?

[paco.soto]

Earlier, UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions, Agnes Kallamard, described the killing of Kassem Suleimani as illegal and violating the Charter of this international organization and international law. ©
Neutral Opinion: Everything is specifically legally formulated in this paragraph.

[Vestovo]

UN found murder of Iranian general Suleymani illegal

A strange formulation of men .. And how many legal killings?
Milosevic, is this legal?

The Serbs understood this .. But Israel, I think, will continue.

[makasan34]

The UN recognized the killing of Iranian General Suleymani illegal, who would doubt

[fif21]

Murder is a crime! And when is the international court?

[rotfuks]

Usually, those who disagree with US policy are killed spontaneously. First, a person in a lured media is declared a terrorist or supporter of terrorists. They handle public opinion. Then a person is destroyed without trial. This is a very convenient policy. Many states use this policy. For example, Ukraine. There, entire regions of dissent were recorded as terrorists and, without a twinge of conscience, shell their own cities with guns. In Spain, the whole region of Catalonia wants to secede, but no one has declared Catalonia terrorists and is not shelling with guns. No one has declared the leaders of Catalonia the main terrorists and does not undermine together with the cafe, as was done with Zakharchenko.