Military Review

To repel the strike: Russia allegedly transferred new missiles for the Iranian S-300 air defense system

58

In anticipation of an air strike, Iran began to equip S-300 anti-aircraft systems with a wide range of missiles, which allegedly were recently received from Russia.


According to Defense Arabic, Iran has begun an emergency deployment of S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems on its territory. The reason for this is a potential air raid on a nuclear research center. This was stated by an Iranian source who noted that guided missiles intended for air defense systems have been delivered to the country for several days in a row from Russia via the Caspian Sea. These include new types. Transportation on Iranian roads is captured in one of the video materials.

According to the publication, given weapon is not offensive, therefore, it does not fall under UN sanctions imposed on Tehran. In this regard, Russia is not obliged to notify international organizations of its supplies to Iran.

Tehran is ready to begin using it [the S-300 system] to repel any airstrikes

- writes Defense Arabic.

At the same time, a number of analysts point out that it is impossible to say about the supply of missiles from Russia based on their transportation through the territory of Iran. Previously, this country received the S-300 along with ammunition, and they can be delivered to the firing positions of anti-aircraft systems.

To repel the strike: Russia allegedly transferred new missiles for the Iranian S-300 air defense system
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 9 July 2020 06: 09 New
    28
    To repel the strike: Russia allegedly transferred new missiles for the Iranian S-300 air defense system
    Why not? Sanctions with them and with us. Stop looking back at the West. angry
    1. Pilat2009
      Pilat2009 9 July 2020 06: 13 New
      +2
      "Ready to start using them"
      And what did you think about before?
      1. Shurik70
        Shurik70 9 July 2020 08: 34 New
        +3
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Why not? Sanctions with them and with us. Stop looking back at the West. angry

        Not just sanctions.
        Even as part of the S-300 missile sanctions, we are not required to notify anyone
    2. Finches
      Finches 9 July 2020 06: 34 New
      +8
      I am wary of many orthodox quirks, but if a couple of "Lockheeds" bury their noses in the sand thanks to the friendly fire of Iranian air defense, I will definitely not grieve ... laughing
      1. Lipchanin
        Lipchanin 9 July 2020 06: 58 New
        +3
        Quote: Finches
        I’m definitely not going to grieve ...

        And you can knock down the piles drinks
        1. Finches
          Finches 9 July 2020 07: 01 New
          +4
          It will never hurt! laughing And for the victory of Russian weapons and for the repose of the Yankees, whom no one has called to Iran!
          1. Lipchanin
            Lipchanin 9 July 2020 07: 39 New
            0
            Quote: Finches
            And for the victory of Russian weapons

            And it never pierced
            drinks
        2. Vitaly gusin
          Vitaly gusin 9 July 2020 10: 30 New
          -8
          Quote: Lipchanin
          And you can knock down the piles

          They don’t check at the commemoration.
          1. nPuBaTuP
            nPuBaTuP 9 July 2020 14: 23 New
            +1
            They don’t check at the commemoration.

            And here you have to fart in a puddle?
            Not tired?
    3. Lipchanin
      Lipchanin 9 July 2020 06: 57 New
      +7
      But in general, who cares what and to whom we are passing.
      Zaluzhniki were supplied to the Taliban by the Stingers.
      The "Jewelins" were presented to the fascist regime.
      Examples of the sea
      1. Zeev zeev
        Zeev zeev 9 July 2020 07: 21 New
        -6
        What, excuse me, "Stingers" were supplied to the Taliban? This organization (banned in Russia) was founded in 1994. And the deliveries of American MANPADS to Afghanistan ended with the release of OKSVA in February 1989.
        1. Lipchanin
          Lipchanin 9 July 2020 07: 40 New
          0
          Quote: ZeevZeev
          What, excuse me, "Stingers" were supplied to the Taliban?

          And to whom excuse me then delivered them?
          Who shot down our helicopters and planes?
          1. Zeev zeev
            Zeev zeev 9 July 2020 08: 05 New
            -3
            And your planes were shot down by the Afghan armed opposition. Fighters from the detachments of Gulbeddin Hekmatyar, Burnuhuddin Rabbani, Ahmad Shah Massoud, Rashid Dostum and other leaders of various Afghan organizations and movements fighting against Soviet troops in Afghanistan and supported by the United States, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, China, Iran, etc. "Peshawar Seven", "Shiite Eight", "Committees of Islamic Resistance" ... So these guys, three years after the withdrawal of Soviet troops, took Kabul and became the new government of Afghanistan. And in 1994, a movement of Islamic students created by the Pakistani special services ("Talib" means "student" in Arabic, and "Taliban" means "students") from the Pashtun south began to fight against this very government.
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. Cyril G ...
          Cyril G ... 9 July 2020 08: 33 New
          +7
          Is this a reason to forget about deliveries?
          1. Zeev zeev
            Zeev zeev 9 July 2020 08: 38 New
            -8
            With the same show-off, the Americans should remember about the supply of Strela MANPADS (and other weapons) to the Viet Cong or the Sandinistas. Or you should remember about deliveries to the same Afghan mujahideen from Iran and China. And then you get some kind of double standards.
            1. Cyril G ...
              Cyril G ... 9 July 2020 08: 40 New
              +6
              Well, why - we had good teachers. And we take an example. So remember about the Stingers, about the Arrows there.
              1. Zeev zeev
                Zeev zeev 9 July 2020 08: 45 New
                -10
                This is a very interesting question - who and from whom studied ...
              2. Vitaly gusin
                Vitaly gusin 9 July 2020 10: 19 New
                -3
                Quote: Cyril G ...
                And we take an example.

                Cyril good afternoon!
                There is nothing to discuss in this topic, air defense systems are not weapons of attack, and every day whoever wants to can sell and donate both complexes and missiles to them.
                There is something more interesting.
                On Wednesday July 8, 2020, Syria and Iran signed a comprehensive agreement on military cooperation within the framework of the Iran signed treaty. "will strengthen Syrian air defense systems".
                Perhaps these movements are related to this.
                Well, Israel’s reaction and actions are understandable.
                And how Russia will react to these actions of Syria is very, very interesting.
                Do not you think that it is not decent on their part, after how much Russia has invested in Syria?
                1. bayard
                  bayard 9 July 2020 22: 52 New
                  0
                  Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                  Do not you think that it is not decent on their part, after how much Russia has invested in Syria?

                  So Iran invested a lot, so if you get around it, it will also be indecent.
                  And we are decent people - let them place, strengthen and improve.
                  After all, it is their military infrastructure that is bombing Israel. request It is not for Russia to deal with their safety. smile

                  Autumn is coming ... the end of the arms embargo for Iran ... on EVERYTHING ... Then real deliveries will begin. fellow bully hi
    4. IsmagilovTR
      IsmagilovTR 9 July 2020 10: 22 New
      0
      they seem to have been sanctioned through the UN Security Council, and we just have a get-together with Western "partners", these are slightly different things.
      1. Vitaly gusin
        Vitaly gusin 9 July 2020 11: 00 New
        0
        Quote: IsmagilovTR
        they seem to have been sanctioned through the UN Security Council,

        Sanctions on offensive weapons. Air defense systems are not like that.
  2. Lebed
    Lebed 9 July 2020 06: 10 New
    20
    On their territory they have every right.
    1. venik
      venik 9 July 2020 07: 38 New
      +5
      Quote: Lebed
      On their territory they have every right.

      =========
      Just like we have full right deliver ammunition to previously sold equipment abroad! drinks
  3. Mitroha
    Mitroha 9 July 2020 06: 21 New
    +1
    There is no privacy with these smartphones. First of all, you need to cut off access to the Internet with a pre-war state.
    It is possible to use something EM during transportation and near secret objects / parts to cut down smarts
    1. svp67
      svp67 9 July 2020 06: 32 New
      10
      Quote: Mitroha
      There is no privacy with these smartphones.

      We must live in the real world, not in the imagined one. What prevents to cover all with tarpaulins?
      1. gurzuf
        gurzuf 9 July 2020 10: 09 New
        0
        +, and ... cheap and cheerful.
    2. Maki Avellevich
      Maki Avellevich 9 July 2020 06: 35 New
      +1
      Quote: Mitroha
      There is no privacy with these smartphones. First of all, you need to cut off access to the Internet with a pre-war state.
      It is possible to use something EM during transportation and near secret objects / parts to cut down smarts

      if they wanted to transport missiles covertly, they would have done so.
      here they clearly wanted to show - we are transporting new missiles.

      ps intelligence existed even before smartphones appeared
      1. Mitroha
        Mitroha 9 July 2020 06: 43 New
        0
        This is a special case and perhaps a special show for interested persons.
        And how many leaks are uncontrollable, I'm not talking about the fighting on the air or the movement of troops with highlighting their geo-location on all towers.
        I'm not talking about the exposure of military personnel and the disclosure of the quantitative and qualitative composition of military units
        1. Maki Avellevich
          Maki Avellevich 9 July 2020 06: 46 New
          0
          Quote: Mitroha
          This is a special case and perhaps a special show for interested persons.
          And how many leaks are uncontrollable, I'm not talking about live operations or the movement of troops with highlighting their geo-location on all towers

          I agree.
          but today the problem is not a lack of information but an overabundance of it.
          the task is how to weed out the misinformation or just mistakes in understanding what is going on by eyewitnesses with smartphones from worthwhile information.
          as the leaf is being read, they are hiding on a tree.
          1. Mitroha
            Mitroha 9 July 2020 06: 50 New
            0
            It is easier to isolate them from an excess of kmk than from missing information. good Especially with the progress of AI on the computer with visual information hi
            1. Maki Avellevich
              Maki Avellevich 9 July 2020 14: 03 New
              0
              Quote: Mitroha
              Especially with the progress of AI on a computer

              AI is the tale of the Vienna Woods.
  4. Semenov
    Semenov 9 July 2020 06: 23 New
    +4
    There was some noise about the accident / sabotage at the Iranian nuclear facility. Apparently, after checking the add. SAM and purchased (we also have it). And "Zircon" was tested, who knows, residents were evacuated, there is no result anywhere.
    1. KCA
      KCA 9 July 2020 07: 27 New
      0
      So "Zircon" is already being tested from the carriers, why drive it at the test site?
      1. Semenov
        Semenov 9 July 2020 08: 55 New
        0
        With a frigate and experience, foreigners are worried about the village, may fall.
    2. The popuas
      The popuas 9 July 2020 10: 11 New
      +1
      Petrel, not zircon
      1. Semenov
        Semenov 9 July 2020 10: 18 New
        0
        Well, what I hypersonic RCC from the thermonuclear engine on the MKR does not distinguish. Sclerosis is, but not so pronounced.
        1. The popuas
          The popuas 9 July 2020 19: 22 New
          0
          Zircon is a hypersonic weapon, and the petrel cr with unlimited range.
  5. svp67
    svp67 9 July 2020 06: 30 New
    +1
    They didn’t break anything, they earned money and what QUESTIONS?
    1. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 9 July 2020 06: 38 New
      +2
      Quote: svp67
      They didn’t break anything, they earned money and what QUESTIONS?

      The sailors have no questions. wink
      1. svp67
        svp67 9 July 2020 06: 42 New
        +3
        Shalom hi
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        The sailors have no questions.
        But the "mattresses" have them ... although it is clear that in our place, in their opinion, they should have been ...
        1. Aaron Zawi
          Aaron Zawi 9 July 2020 06: 43 New
          0
          Quote: svp67
          Shalom hi
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          The sailors have no questions.
          But the "mattresses" have them ... although it is clear that in our place, in their opinion, they should have been ...

          The pun is a great power. good
  6. orionvitt
    orionvitt 9 July 2020 06: 55 New
    -1
    This weapon is not offensive, therefore, it does not fall under UN sanctions
    But it prevents others from attacking. It interferes with downloading the rights to the "masters of the world" and their lackeys, such as Israel and the Saudis. As they say, a trifle, but nice.
  7. yuliatreb
    yuliatreb 9 July 2020 07: 03 New
    0
    Yes, everything is much simpler here, missiles of this type could have appeared among Iranians long before their targets began to be fired upon, such serious decisions in our liberal government have been taken for more than one and two years, and in order to really accept this agreement, it must be done that then happen.
  8. Gardamir
    Gardamir 9 July 2020 07: 18 New
    +1
    allegedly
    And they were scared. It is our business to whom and what to supply.
  9. Ros 56
    Ros 56 9 July 2020 07: 49 New
    0
    Even if they sold something to Iran who cares, it’s our political and commercial interest and don’t get into our business.
  10. Poetry
    Poetry 9 July 2020 08: 21 New
    0
    To whom we want, we will supply what we see fit. It's time to change the rhetoric. And then we, as terpils, make excuses for everything. Some kind of hoopoe indulge us.
  11. sivuch
    sivuch 9 July 2020 09: 23 New
    0
    However, there is not even an assumption what kind of zurkov. It is unlikely that 40N6 or 9M96 (these are those with an active head). The rest are semi-active and fundamentally do not change anything.
  12. 013Azer
    013Azer 9 July 2020 09: 44 New
    0
    For a reason unknown so far, the IRGC deployed the Sayyad-2 air defense system in the city of Urmia on the border with Azerbaijan.
    In recent weeks, Ksir deployed air defense systems in Ardabil, Asharan and other areas along the border of Azerbaijan

    1. Zeev zeev
      Zeev zeev 9 July 2020 11: 40 New
      0
      Why, "for an unknown reason." Iran fears that Israel will use Azerbaijani airbases to strike at the targets of the Islamists' nuclear program. So they put a barrier along the border.
    2. Kosh
      Kosh 11 July 2020 15: 04 New
      0
      This is not Sayyad-2, but Sayyad-1 - the old Iranian missiles that were manufactured under a Chinese license for those purchased in the 1980s. SAM HQ-2J. Recently, as new Iranian air defense systems arrived, they were removed from duty from positions around Tehran and Isfahan. Perhaps they decided to strengthen their air defense in the north-west of the country, since there it was generally extremely weak. But it’s difficult to draw any conclusion from the video with one missile, since the HQ-2 air defense system itself, like the original S-75, is a large complex that is not very mobile.
  13. Paranoid50
    Paranoid50 9 July 2020 11: 25 New
    +2
    It smacks of anti-Semitism. laughing
    1. Vestovoi
      Vestovoi 9 July 2020 15: 49 New
      -4
      Quote: Paranoid50
      It smacks of anti-Semitism. laughing

      wassat Yes ... lol
  14. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 9 July 2020 12: 29 New
    0
    And this is some kind of sensation? The Russian Federation violated something?
  15. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 9 July 2020 13: 55 New
    +2
    Iran needs to make good rocket armament so that during a raid it could repel a raid and itself fully respond with missiles, it will plow the aggressor with all the airfields with pilots, airplanes and immediately the order will come.
  16. Vestovoi
    Vestovoi 9 July 2020 15: 47 New
    -5
    There is no smoke without fire .. It is high time for Iran to create a layered air defense .. They won’t be left behind!
  17. nobody111body
    nobody111body 9 July 2020 16: 07 New
    -1
    so what ? Assad also has "weapons", however, "Shoot down these planes and don't touch these bandits on the same planes" - the same thing, and Ayatollah will or will be shot down, no one knows anything; some dark personality is waiting for something - maybe when the Jews start raids on the "kapustin yar", the Israeli bandits are not far away on a plane across the Caspian Sea, and now "it" I don't want to bomb
  18. kamikaze
    kamikaze 10 July 2020 23: 36 New
    0
    it's time to put ammunition for the S-300.
  19. Kosh
    Kosh 11 July 2020 14: 42 New
    0
    Another stupid stuffing.
    Firstly, the video container generally carries a transport container for the S-200 complex missile.
    Secondly, the S-300s have been on combat duty in Iran since 2017, and change their locations from time to time.
    Third, what are the "new types" of guided missiles? Iran, together with the S-300PMU-2, received 48N6E2 missiles, there are newer only 48N6E3 from the S-400 ..