In Serbia showed purchased in China drones CH-92A

The Ministry of Defense of Serbia received six Chinese reconnaissance and strike weapons drones CH-92A. The presentation of the delivered equipment took place on July 4 at the Serbian Air Force base in Batajnice.

The presentation of six Chinese-made CH-92A UAVs was held at the Bateinice air base. It was attended by the President of Serbia Alexander Vučić and the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Serbia, General Milan Moisilovic. Together with the drones, the Serbian military showed 18 FT-8C guided missiles with laser semi-active guidance, designed to launch from UAVs. The missile has a mass of 18 kg and a range at launch from different heights from 6 to 9 km. According to Vučić, Serbia will purchase "more of these missiles."

UAV CH-92A was first presented in 2012 at an exhibition in Zhuhai. Serbia signed a contract for the supply of six drones of this type in 2018.

According to the official information of the UAV developer, the length of the SN-92 is 4,1 m, the height is 1,6 m, the wingspan is 9 m, the maximum take-off weight is 300 kg, the payload is 60 kg (for the SN-92A according to Serbian data, the maximum take-off weight is 380 kg, the payload weight is 75 kg). 37,25 kW gasoline engine, two-blade propeller, pushing.

According to the bmpd blog, this model is not equipped with a satellite communications system, so its range is limited to 250 km. Flight duration 10 hours. The cruising flight altitude is 1980–2500 m, the maximum altitude is 5980 m (for the SN-92A - 5000 m). Typical cruising speed - 120-160 km / h, maximum speed - 180-190 km / h.

Comments

[Doccor18]

TTX does not shine, but simple and cheap. For Serbia just.
That this Vučić alone without a mask does not protect himself ..

[Horst78]

Quote: Doccor18

TTX not shine

250 km for Serbia just right. The main thing is that there would be no interceptions.

[Doccor18]

For Serbia just.

I, like, wrote

[Horst78]

Quote: Doccor18

I, like, wrote

I just added range

[Alexey from Perm]

We cannot do such (((

[Doccor18]

We cannot do such (((

We can! We can do almost everything! But the desires of the people often diverge from the desires of those in power ...

[Alexey from Perm]

nevertheless, they didn’t .. they did the Hunter with a jet engine, how it will be used incomprehensibly ... A hefty UAV will most likely be visible on the locators and is expensive. And these make light airplanes with propellers that cause real damage and are not like our hunter ...

[Grazdanin]

The hunter is more likely a demonstrator of opportunities, in a series I doubt that he will go in this form. Very expensive and big restrictions are flying wing schemes.

[Alexey from Perm]

and we have everything like that - all demontors - Armata - demonstrator, Su 57 - demonstrator, the list goes on, Losharik, Poseidons, petrels ... etc.

[CSKA]

Quote: Alexey from Perm

Armata demonstrator

Armata will soon go into series. Or do we have an urgent need for 1000 tanks?

Quote: Alexey from Perm

Su 57- demonstrator

A contract has already been signed on the Su-57, which means it will be delivered.

Quote: Alexey from Perm

Poseidons, petrels ... etc.

About them, Putin only announced the development in 2018, and you already think dozens of them should have been accepted. Not all at once.

[Alexey from Perm]

The Armat series will be small, it will not solve anything. the tank didn’t work, and I think the military does not like it. Su 57 fell serial, after nothing is heard.
All that Putin says about new weapons and the army is a pure self-PR, nothing more

[CSKA]

Quote: Alexey from Perm

Armat series will be small

And what should it be? Which country have recently purchased 1000 tanks? Or do we have an urgent need to purchase hundreds?

Quote: Alexey from Perm

she will not decide anything

)))))) And what should she decide? How do you even imagine this? Without the Air Force, OTRK, and other tanks and BPM, we’ll start the offensive? Do not tell me where by the way? It is necessary to gradually purchase in small batches, and not to inflate the defense budget.

Quote: Alexey from Perm

tank not work

))))) Is that what you decided? Who are you? Designer T-72?

Quote: Alexey from Perm

and I think the military doesn't like him

These are just your guesses, it is not clear what are based on.

Quote: Alexey from Perm

Su 57 dropped serial

So what? Know how many F-35s have already fallen?

Quote: Alexey from Perm

after nothing is heard.

You forgot to report.

Quote: Alexey from Perm

All that Putin says about new weapons and the army is a pure self-PR, nothing more

Of course PR. You personally checked Zircon, inspected Petrel and Poseidon, tested Peresvet. The only strange thing is that the United States wants to include a number of these weapons in the new strategic offensive arms.
In general, it is not surprising to hear and read another nonsense about Putin’s cartoons and inventions. Already heard it from a liberda like Groysman and the rest.

[Doccor18]

But the desires of the people often diverge from the desires of those in power ...

Nothing to add ..

[And Makarov]

Now Serbia, even Chinese. Are growing.

[fa2998]

And Russia has lost the UAV market. Neither in arsenal, nor for export. Even China has overtaken. They will expose it later. But at this time, competitors are improving technology, customers are leaving.

[Grazdanin]

Quote: fa2998

Russia has lost the UAV market

How can you lose what was not?

[APASUS]

Chinese, not Chinese, but control of Kosovo is just the Serbs.

[Quadro]

As the bmpd blog writes

Or maybe you will use authoritative sources more than someone’s blog in LJ? But what about professionalism? Did this uncle personally steer a Chinese UAV?

[Horst78]

Quote: Quadro

Or maybe you will use authoritative sources more than someone’s blog in LJ?

Well, the source is reliable. There are many references to it in VO.

[Quadro]

Well, the number of links to it does not mean anything, there are also many links to NI and Ukrainian news. What is the problem of finding a Chinese source? They export it, so the data is there, and if they are closed, how does this source know if it is with or without a satellite communications system? This I have no claim specifically to the blog, I myself somehow read a lot of things there, but again, there should be professional journalism. This also applies to Twitter and Facebook sources.

[Horst78]

Chinese source like "Sohu"? I only read about simple Chinese life in Chinese sources. But about technology in armaments, sources from China do not inspire confidence in me. How do we print "those who have no analogs in the world", etc.?

[Quadro]

This TV bullshit for domestic consumption has no analogues. And China is big, Sokhu is not limited. Again, I would rather believe in official data than in some blog that knows from where knows what is there, as if an intelligence agent with his network and already knows the real data. About our weapons, too, in the West, some "authoritative" sources paint about our technology from nowhere, and then it turns out that on the docks of the Cold War and the very old.

[Horst78]

Quote: Quadro

Again, I believe more in the official data

The Chinese have just the problem with official information. Constantly either TTX underestimate / overstate or hold back. That's the difference in performance characteristics with Serbia.

Quote: Quadro

rather than a blog that knows how it’s worth it, it’s like an intelligence agent with his network already knows the real data

He often uses pictures from exhibitions and, if available, uploads the performance characteristics indicated by the manufacturer on the stands.

[Thorvlobnor IV]

Does Serbia have its own military telecommunications satellite?

[pereselenec]

Quote: Quadro

Well, the number of links to it does not mean anything, there are also many links to NI and Ukrainian news.

Aren't you already used to such a presentation? Some kind of garbage resource is taken, or in general someone’s bunch in social networks and the information from it is laid out here in the form of an article under a loud heading:

"In the West they got scared ..."
"They were worried in Kiev ..."
"Indignation was expressed in Lithuania ..."
"In China they commented ..."