Military Review

In Serbia showed purchased in China drones CH-92A

25
In Serbia showed purchased in China drones CH-92A

The Ministry of Defense of Serbia has been armed with six Chinese reconnaissance and strike drone CH-92A. The presentation of the delivered equipment took place on July 4 at the Serbian Air Force Base in Batajnice.


The presentation of six Chinese-made CH-92A UAVs was held at the Bateinice air base. It was attended by the President of Serbia Alexander Vučić and the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Serbia, General Milan Moisilovic. Together with the drones, the Serbian military showed 18 FT-8C guided missiles with laser semi-active guidance, designed to launch from UAVs. The missile has a mass of 18 kg and a range at launch from different heights from 6 to 9 km. According to Vučić, Serbia will purchase "more of these missiles."

UAV CH-92A was first presented in 2012 at an exhibition in Zhuhai. Serbia signed a contract for the supply of six drones of this type in 2018.


According to the official information of the UAV developer, the length of the SN-92 is 4,1 m, the height is 1,6 m, the wingspan is 9 m, the maximum take-off weight is 300 kg, the payload is 60 kg (for the SN-92A according to Serbian data, the maximum take-off weight is 380 kg, the payload weight is 75 kg). 37,25 kW gasoline engine, two-blade propeller, pushing.


According to the bmpd blog, this model is not equipped with a satellite communications system, so its range is limited to 250 km. Flight duration 10 hours. The cruising flight altitude is 1980–2500 m, the maximum altitude is 5980 m (for the SN-92A - 5000 m). Typical cruising speed - 120-160 km / h, maximum speed - 180-190 km / h.
Photos used:
Serbian Ministry of Defense
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Doccor18
    Doccor18 7 July 2020 13: 55 New
    +4
    TTX does not shine, but simple and cheap. For Serbia just.
    That this Vučić alone without a mask does not protect himself ..
    1. Horst78
      Horst78 7 July 2020 15: 48 New
      +2
      Quote: Doccor18
      TTX not shine

      250 km for Serbia just right. The main thing is that there would be no interceptions.
      1. Doccor18
        Doccor18 7 July 2020 16: 33 New
        0
        For Serbia just.

        I, like, wrote request
        1. Horst78
          Horst78 7 July 2020 16: 45 New
          0
          Quote: Doccor18
          I, like, wrote

          I just added range winked hi
    2. Alexey from Perm
      Alexey from Perm 7 July 2020 16: 24 New
      +2
      We cannot do such (((
      1. Doccor18
        Doccor18 7 July 2020 16: 34 New
        -2
        We cannot do such (((

        We can! We can do almost everything! But the desires of the people often diverge from the desires of those in power ...
        1. Alexey from Perm
          Alexey from Perm 7 July 2020 18: 27 New
          0
          nevertheless, they didn’t .. they did the Hunter with a jet engine, how it will be used incomprehensibly ... A hefty UAV will most likely be visible on the locators and is expensive. And these make light airplanes with propellers that cause real damage and are not like our hunter ...
          1. Grazdanin
            Grazdanin 7 July 2020 18: 40 New
            0
            The hunter is more likely a demonstrator of opportunities, in a series I doubt that he will go in this form. Very expensive and big restrictions are flying wing schemes.
            1. Alexey from Perm
              Alexey from Perm 7 July 2020 18: 42 New
              +2
              and we have everything like that - all demontors - Armata - demonstrator, Su 57 - demonstrator, the list goes on, Losharik, Poseidons, petrels ... etc.
              1. CSKA
                CSKA 8 July 2020 10: 43 New
                -1
                Quote: Alexey from Perm
                Armata demonstrator

                Armata will soon go into series. Or do we have an urgent need for 1000 tanks?
                Quote: Alexey from Perm
                Su 57- demonstrator

                A contract has already been signed on the Su-57, which means it will be delivered.
                Quote: Alexey from Perm
                Poseidons, petrels ... etc.

                About them, Putin only announced the development in 2018, and you already think dozens of them should have been accepted. Not all at once.
                1. Alexey from Perm
                  Alexey from Perm 8 July 2020 22: 15 New
                  0
                  The Armat series will be small, it will not solve anything. the tank didn’t work, and I think the military does not like it. Su 57 fell serial, after nothing is heard.
                  All that Putin says about new weapons and the army is a pure self-PR, nothing more
                  1. CSKA
                    CSKA 9 July 2020 11: 53 New
                    0
                    Quote: Alexey from Perm
                    Armat series will be small

                    And what should it be? Which country have recently purchased 1000 tanks? Or do we have an urgent need to purchase hundreds?
                    Quote: Alexey from Perm
                    she will not decide anything

                    )))))) And what should she decide? How do you even imagine this? Without the Air Force, OTRK, and other tanks and BPM, we’ll start the offensive? Do not tell me where by the way? It is necessary to gradually purchase in small batches, and not to inflate the defense budget.
                    Quote: Alexey from Perm
                    tank not work

                    ))))) Is that what you decided? Who are you? Designer T-72?
                    Quote: Alexey from Perm
                    and I think the military doesn't like him

                    These are just your guesses, it is not clear what are based on.
                    Quote: Alexey from Perm
                    Su 57 dropped serial

                    So what? Know how many F-35s have already fallen?
                    Quote: Alexey from Perm
                    after nothing is heard.

                    You forgot to report.
                    Quote: Alexey from Perm
                    All that Putin says about new weapons and the army is a pure self-PR, nothing more

                    Of course PR. You personally checked Zircon, inspected Petrel and Poseidon, tested Peresvet. The only strange thing is that the United States wants to include a number of these weapons in the new strategic offensive arms.
                    In general, it is not surprising to hear and read another nonsense about Putin’s cartoons and inventions. Already heard it from a liberda like Groysman and the rest.
          2. Doccor18
            Doccor18 7 July 2020 18: 44 New
            -1
            But the desires of the people often diverge from the desires of those in power ...

            Nothing to add ..
  2. And Makarov
    And Makarov 7 July 2020 13: 57 New
    13
    Now Serbia, even Chinese. Are growing.
    1. fa2998
      fa2998 7 July 2020 15: 33 New
      +5
      And Russia has lost the UAV market. Neither in arsenal, nor for export. Even China has overtaken. They will expose it later. But at this time, competitors are improving technology, customers are leaving.
      1. Grazdanin
        Grazdanin 7 July 2020 15: 55 New
        +5
        Quote: fa2998
        Russia has lost the UAV market

        How can you lose what was not?
  3. APASUS
    APASUS 7 July 2020 15: 04 New
    +3
    Chinese, not Chinese, but control of Kosovo is just the Serbs.
  4. Quadro
    Quadro 7 July 2020 15: 25 New
    -5
    As the bmpd blog writes

    Or maybe you will use authoritative sources more than someone’s blog in LJ? But what about professionalism? Did this uncle personally steer a Chinese UAV?
    1. Horst78
      Horst78 7 July 2020 15: 47 New
      +5
      Quote: Quadro
      Or maybe you will use authoritative sources more than someone’s blog in LJ?

      Well, the source is reliable. There are many references to it in VO.
      1. Quadro
        Quadro 7 July 2020 15: 51 New
        -3
        Well, the number of links to it does not mean anything, there are also many links to NI and Ukrainian news. What is the problem of finding a Chinese source? They export it, so the data is there, and if they are closed, how does this source know if it is with or without a satellite communications system? This I have no claim specifically to the blog, I myself somehow read a lot of things there, but again, there should be professional journalism. This also applies to Twitter and Facebook sources.
        1. Horst78
          Horst78 7 July 2020 15: 55 New
          +1
          Chinese source Tipo "Soho"? I only read about simple Chinese life in Chinese sources. But about technologies in armaments, sources from China do not inspire confidence in me. How we print "having no analogues in the world", etc.
          1. Quadro
            Quadro 7 July 2020 15: 58 New
            -3
            Unparalleled this is a television poppycock for domestic consumption. Yes, and China is big, Soho is not limited. Again, I believe in official data more than in some kind of blog that knows where it is from, like an intelligence agent with his network already knows the real data. Some “authoritative” sources about our weapons in the west also don’t know where our technology is from, and then it turns out that it’s from the docks of the Cold War and from the very old.
            1. Horst78
              Horst78 7 July 2020 16: 16 New
              +2
              Quote: Quadro
              Again, I believe more in the official data

              The Chinese have just the problem with official information. Constantly either TTX underestimate / overstate or hold back. That's the difference in performance characteristics with Serbia.
              Quote: Quadro
              rather than a blog that knows how it’s worth it, it’s like an intelligence agent with his network already knows the real data

              He often uses pictures from exhibitions and, if available, uploads the performance characteristics indicated by the manufacturer on the stands.
        2. Thorvlobnor IV
          Thorvlobnor IV 7 July 2020 16: 29 New
          0
          Does Serbia have its own military telecommunications satellite?
        3. pereselenec
          pereselenec 7 July 2020 18: 06 New
          -2
          Quote: Quadro
          Well, the number of links to it does not mean anything, there are also many links to NI and Ukrainian news.


          Aren't you already used to such a presentation? Some kind of garbage resource is taken, or in general someone’s bunch in social networks and the information from it is laid out here in the form of an article under a loud heading:

          "In the West they were scared ..."
          "In Kiev, worried ..."
          "Lithuania expressed indignation ..."
          "In China, commented ..."

          hi