Military Review

The new party of the Russian Federation proposes a referendum on the accession of LDNR, Abkhazia and other republics to Russia

151

Not so long ago, the formed party “For Truth”, led by Zakhar Prilepin, came up with a proposal on Russia's future political attitude towards unrecognized and partially recognized republics. We are talking about the Lugansk and Donetsk people's republics, as well as South Ossetia (South Ossetia), Abkhazia and the Transnistrian Moldavian Republic (PMR).


According to the proposal contained in the election program of the party “For Truth”, in Russia it is necessary to hold a referendum on the inclusion of the above-mentioned republics in Russia. At the same time, the party of Zakhar Prilepin proposed replenishing the Basic Law of the country with a clause on the possibility of accession to the Russian Federation of any territory following the results of referenda both in this territory and in the Russian Federation.

The basis is this: if 75% of the citizens of a territory in a referendum advocate joining Russia, then, on the basis of the will of the citizens of the Russian Federation, such a territory can become part of our country. The option of joining the rights of a subject of the federation is mentioned (by analogy with the Crimea and Sevastopol).

Additionally, the program of Zakhar Prilepin speaks of the need to create a full-fledged Union of Russia and Belarus. “For Truth” proposes to create such an alliance with unified authorities, currency and budget.

A reaction is expected from the authorities of Belarus and the above republics to those initiatives that are spelled out in the program of the new Russian political force.
Photos used:
Facebook / Movement For Truth
151 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. nPuBaTuP
    nPuBaTuP 7 July 2020 06: 30 New
    +3
    Well done Zahar .... respect !!!
    It's time to return these territories home !!!!
    1. Finches
      Finches 7 July 2020 06: 38 New
      40
      This is called populism! But they’re swimming a bit shallow - you need to start with the return of Alaska - the Americans didn’t save a hundred pounds of the purchase receipt ... laughing
      1. Graz
        Graz 7 July 2020 06: 48 New
        +8
        they didn’t seem to pay half for it in the end under the contract of sale, in fact of non-payment it is a priori insignificant
        1. ork_333
          ork_333 7 July 2020 07: 53 New
          18
          Enough of procrastinating this Alaska! She sold, sold! Forget all sorts of conspiracy theories and other dregs. The Americans did not want to buy it, because they did not see the value in it. And to us its content, in such a distance from the main part of the country, cost a pretty penny. So at that time its sale was justified on all counts.
          1. zadorin1974
            zadorin1974 7 July 2020 09: 31 New
            0
            Prior I completely agree with you. Alaska for Russia was and will be a suitcase without a handle. We now only bring the main roads on our territory to the pro-ancient level by 60%.
            Now consider this version of history. Theoretically, Alaska was a part of RI by 1917. There is a revolution and a civil war. Do you think that the Bolsheviks would succeed in holding Alaska as well? All the forces of the White movement would flock to its territory, and not be spread to the world. As a result, we would get the most hostile state on our border (Poland, crying, smoking aside). This, of course, is a theory.
            1. Eugene Kodola
              Eugene Kodola 7 July 2020 11: 09 New
              0
              All that lies bad along our borders is to attach! At least in order to create buffer zones!
              1. snake
                snake 7 July 2020 16: 51 New
                +1
                Quote: Eugene Kodola
                All that lies bad along our borders is to attach!

                The expansionist militarist is ordinary. Couch.
            2. nPuBaTuP
              nPuBaTuP 7 July 2020 11: 49 New
              +3
              Yes, all the forces of the White movement would flock to its territory, and not spread out around the world

              Well, they did not flock to Chukotka or Wrangel Island .....
              By the way, read about the development of the island by the Soviet government .... you will find a lot of interesting things .... so that the Bolsheviks could squeeze out and hold Alaska ....
      2. mikh-korsakov
        mikh-korsakov 7 July 2020 09: 11 New
        10
        With all due respect to Prilepin's talent - but in vain he is. He can propose something for the red words, whatever comes to mind, knowing that his party will never fall into power. Here, some with sarcasm offered to demand from the Americans Alaska. And I would go further. I would demand Hawaii by this logic. In fact, many islands there were discovered by the Russian navigator Lisyansky. And the climate is better there, and the inhabitants are more fun.
        1. Vend
          Vend 7 July 2020 10: 59 New
          0
          Quote: mikh-korsakov
          With all due respect to Prilepin's talent - but in vain he is. He can propose something for the red words, whatever comes to mind, knowing that his party will never fall into power. Here, some with sarcasm offered to demand from the Americans Alaska. And I would go further. I would demand Hawaii by this logic. In fact, many islands there were discovered by the Russian navigator Lisyansky. And the climate is better there, and the inhabitants are more fun.

          Yes, it seems like populism to attract supporters. Harbors should not be required; they are not legally occupied by the United States. I think Hawaii would not refuse to become an independent state.
      3. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 7 July 2020 09: 16 New
        -9
        Quote: Finches
        This is called populism! But they swim a little shallow - you need to start with the return of Alaska laughing

        MikroZhirik dreams of glory. request
        How pathetic our oligarch oligophrenics are trying to offer an alternative to Putin in the most colorful wrappers. Udaltsov, Navalny, Grudinin, ... now also Prilepin.

        1 United Russia by Dmitry Medvedev, Sergey Neverov
        2 Communist Party of the Russian Federation Gennady Zyuganov
        3 Liberal Democratic Party of Russia Vladimir Zhirinovsky
        4 Patriots of Russia Gennady Semigin
        5 Russian United Democratic Party Yabloko Grigory Yavlinsky
        6 Fair Russia by Sergey Mironov
        7 Growth Party by Boris Titov
        8 People's Freedom Party by Mikhail Kasyanov
        9 Democratic Party of Russia DPR Timur Bogdanov
        10 People's Party “For Women of Russia”
        11 Alliance of Greens by Alexander Zakondyrin
        12 Union of Citizens SG Vyacheslav Smirnov
        13 People's Party of Russia by Andrei Bogdanov, Stanislav Aranovich
        14 Civic Position by Andrey Poda
        15 Social Democratic Party of Russia by Andrei Bogdanov Sirazhdin Ramazanov
        16 Communist Party of Social Justice of the CPSU by Andrey Bogdanov
        17 All-Russian political party "Party of Pensioners of Russia" Nikolai Chebotaryov
        18 Cities of Russia by Юрий Бабак
        19 Party of Free Citizens Party of Citizens Pavel Sklyanchuk
        20 Russian Ecological Party Greens by Anatoly Panfilov
        21 Communists of Russia Maxim Suraykin
        22 Agrarian Party of Russia Olga Bashmachnikova Vladimir Plotnikov
        23 Russian All-Union Union by Sergey Baburin
        24 Party for justice! Ponomarenko V.S.
        25 Social Protection Party
        26 Civil Power Cyril Bykanin
        27 Russian party of pensioners for social justice Vladimir Burakov
        28 People's Alliance by Andrey Bogdanov, Olga Anischenko
        29 Monarchist party by Anton Bakov
        30 Civil platform Rifat Shaikhutdinov
        31 “HONESTLY” Alexey Zolotukhin
        32 Labor Party of Russia Sergey Vostretsov
        33 Against all Pavel Mikhalchenkov
        34 Russian Socialist Party Sergey Cherkashin
        35 Party of Veterans of Russia Ildar Rezyapov
        36 Russian United Labor Front Victor Tyulkin
        37 Party affairs Konstantin Babkin
        38 Homeland by Alexey Zhuravlev
        39 Union of Labor by Alexander Shershukov
        40 Female Dialogue by Elena Semerikova
        41 Rural Renaissance Party
        42 Defenders of the Fatherland Nikolay Sobolev
        43 Cossack party of the Russian Federation Nikolay Konstantinov
        44 Development of Russia by Alexey Kaminsky
        45 Democratic Legal Russia by Igor Trunov
        46 Great Patriotic Party Igor Ashmanov, de facto Nikolai Starikov
        47 Russian party of gardeners Igor Kasyanov
        48 Party of Changes GRANI Party Andrei Nechaev
        49 Russian Revival Party by Viktor Arkhipov
        50 National course Andrey Kovalenko
        51 The people against corruption Grigory Anisimov
        52 Native Party Sergey Orlov Nadezhda Demidova
        53 International Party of Russia Zuleykhat Ulybasheva
        54 Party of Social Reforms Stanislav Polishchuk
        55 United party of people with disabilities of Russia Vladimir Maltsev
        56 Party “Good Deeds, the Protection of Children, Women, Freedom, Nature and Senior Citizens” by Andrei Kirillov
        57 The revival of agrarian Russia by Vasily Krylov
        58 Alternative for Russia (Party of Socialist Choice) (formerly Change, Support Party) by Antonina Serova
        59 Party of Parents of the Future Marina Voronova
        60 Russian Small Business Party
        61 People's Patriotic Party of Russia - Power to the People

        In the names of the parties, the symbolic, for us, word "truth" was not used. I give the word, even more significant, "conscience." repeat
        Have a feeder.
        1. nikon7717
          nikon7717 7 July 2020 11: 07 New
          +3
          I always look at the huge number of these parties and the ego of their founders. Instead of combining, more and more are crushed. They would have to merge, collect voters in their heaps, develop common platforms, and they ... Divide them and rule the puppeteer. Yes, and their goals in most cases, populism and snatch from the feeder. Although if the union had passed more forces there would have been an impact on the feeding trough.
      4. New
        New Year day 7 July 2020 09: 19 New
        +4
        Quote: Finches
        This is called populism!

        For the first time I agree with Zyablitsov! If a fan of zeroing thinks so, then it is.
        In the fall, perhaps, elections to the State Duma. Everyone started to fuss. Soon they will indeed announce
        Quote: Finches
        from the return of Alaska

        By the way, Aleuts consider themselves Russian
        1. mikh-korsakov
          mikh-korsakov 7 July 2020 09: 55 New
          -2
          Sylvester! I agree with you. There is one comment about the "Aleuts consider themselves Russian." Aleuts are Eskimos or very few of them, or Anglo-Saxons. These do not consider themselves Russian. As for the Eskimos, it is possible that the tradition has persisted among the people that once white bearded people came and brought fire water - it was mostly cold.
        2. 210ox
          210ox 7 July 2020 10: 35 New
          +6
          That's exactly populism. Do the residents of these republics want to join the Russian Federation? For example, the same Abkhazia. They adapted well. They receive finances from Moscow, they organized anarchy there, they don’t want to restore order.
          1. nPuBaTuP
            nPuBaTuP 7 July 2020 11: 53 New
            0
            Get finances from Moscow,

            So, I think that if we start to cut back on the finances we receive a little, then I think they will crush anarchy too and will be asked to Russia .....
      5. NordUral
        NordUral 7 July 2020 11: 09 New
        +4
        Populism is just Alaska.
        1. Finches
          Finches 7 July 2020 16: 34 New
          +3
          Alaska is sarcasm! laughing
          1. NordUral
            NordUral 7 July 2020 16: 37 New
            +2
            So thin.
      6. Souchastnik
        Souchastnik 7 July 2020 16: 27 New
        0
        Americans didn’t keep a hundred poods of a purchase receipt ...

        Do you have a contract of sale, or lease? If yes, then urgently to court.
        Return, my friend, immediately return laughing
      7. Interlocutor
        Interlocutor 7 July 2020 19: 13 New
        0
        hundred poods Americans did not save the purchase receipt


        laughing laughing laughing That damn it will be - saved. Somewhere, in a bank, lies in a cell.
        1. Finches
          Finches 7 July 2020 20: 01 New
          -1
          Anglo-Saxons can! laughing
      8. Fan
        Fan 7 July 2020 19: 34 New
        +1
        Quote: Finches
        This is called populism! But they’re swimming a bit shallow - you need to start with the return of Alaska - the Americans didn’t save a hundred pounds of the purchase receipt ... laughing

        Definitely, Zakhar went to the wrong steppe .... Who wished him a question.
        Alaska is more globally Eugene (it is proved that Indians are direct descendants of immigrants from Russia (Yakuts Khanty, Chukchi, etc.) !!! laughing From Japan you need to shake Kolchak's gold with interest, etc.
        In general, such topics are better not to raise, but to join quietly, etc.
        Most often, populism leads to big blood .. But in Russia we don’t need this
    2. SOVIET UNION 2
      SOVIET UNION 2 7 July 2020 07: 10 New
      -11
      And will the amended constitution violate the territorial integrity of Russia? This is a change of boundaries! winked
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 7 July 2020 07: 55 New
        10
        Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
        And will the amended constitution violate the territorial integrity of Russia? This is a change of boundaries!

        No, you can’t alienate your territories, but you can demarcate strangers
        1. Ingvar 72
          Ingvar 72 7 July 2020 08: 40 New
          +5
          So if you rest against the letter of the law, then you can demarcate your own. wink
        2. New
          New Year day 7 July 2020 09: 20 New
          +2
          Quote: Tusv
          No, you can’t alienate your territories, but you can demarcate strangers

          the law is like a drawbar, where do you turn it? laughing
        3. Fan
          Fan 7 July 2020 20: 07 New
          0
          Quote: Tusv
          Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
          And will the amended constitution violate the territorial integrity of Russia? This is a change of boundaries!

          No, you can’t alienate your territories, but you can demarcate strangers

          I would rather say restore the borders of Russia! Many will not like this, but each of its difficult periods in the history of Russia has recovered within its borders and has become even stronger ....
          All this usually happened voluntarily ...
      2. orionvitt
        orionvitt 7 July 2020 09: 05 New
        +7
        Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
        This is a change of boundaries!

        This is primarily the return of illegally seized territories in 1991. This is so by the way. And in the case, not what Prilepin is doing. As the saying goes "drives horses." First you need to deal with political regimes in Ukraine, Georgia and the rest, very "greyhound" type of state. To make Russia's position stronger in relation to Europe and the USA. And then it is already possible to think about the return of territories, referenda and other things. And today, such an initiative looks like a blatant provocation. All the time
        1. New
          New Year day 7 July 2020 09: 21 New
          +1
          Quote: orionvitt
          This is primarily a comeback illegally seized territories in 1991 year.

          specify your position. Do you make territorial claims to your neighbors?
          1. orionvitt
            orionvitt 7 July 2020 09: 38 New
            +3
            Quote: Silvestr
            Do you make territorial claims to your neighbors?

            For starters, by and large, these are souvenir type of state, appeared solely due to the weakening of the central government. There were no historical prerequisites for their occurrence. (A type of strengthening of national cultures, national liberation wars, the history of statehood, etc.) So the time comes to correct political mistakes of the past. If the "neighbors" who made money at the expense of the Soviet Union do not like something, this is their problem. By the way, I myself live, as you say in the territory of the "neighbors". And believe me, fed up.
            1. New
              New Year day 7 July 2020 12: 03 New
              +1
              Quote: orionvitt
              If the "neighbors" who made money at the expense of the Soviet Union do not like something, this is their problem.

              those. you are making territorial claims against neighboring states. Motivation is indifferent.
              Do you think you will take only land or with the population? What will you do with those who disagree? Does this remind you of the actions of one master to free the Aryan lands?
              1. orionvitt
                orionvitt 8 July 2020 05: 38 New
                0

                Not reminiscent of. Since the technique of returning lands with the Aryan population from a certain master, as you say, implied the destruction of another part of the population, not the Aryan. What Russia has never done. And in general, your comparison of the methods of Nazi Germany and the USSR is inappropriate. So you agree that the Soviet Union, along with Germany, is responsible for the Second World War.
        2. Krasnoyarsk
          Krasnoyarsk 7 July 2020 10: 07 New
          +3
          Quote: orionvitt
          it says "drives horses." First you need to deal with political regimes in Ukraine, Georgia and the rest, very "greyhound" type of state. To make Russia's position stronger in relation to Europe and

          Well, the flag is in your hands. You read, so everyone knows how to do it, but for some reason no one does, only teaches.
          1. orionvitt
            orionvitt 7 July 2020 11: 25 New
            +1
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            You read, so everyone knows how to do it, but for some reason no one does, only teaches

            Only cats will be born quickly, as Bender said. When the right moment has ripened, Crimea was returned instantly. Politics, this is not only chopping the shoulder, but very often, the ability to wait.
            1. New
              New Year day 7 July 2020 12: 04 New
              +2
              Quote: orionvitt
              When the right moment has ripened, Crimea was returned instantly

              but how was it returned? The feeling is that the Crimeans stood apart and looked at the return. Do you guarantee the same impulse in the "occupied territories"?
              1. Krasnoyarsk
                Krasnoyarsk 7 July 2020 12: 58 New
                +1
                Quote: Silvestr
                but how was it returned?

                Sylvester, you are right to say - "returned Crimea" is somewhat wrong.
                There was a mutual desire, for Russia, to return Crimea, and for Crimea, to return to Russia. And without this mutual desire, I’m not sure that anything would have worked out.
        3. nPuBaTuP
          nPuBaTuP 7 July 2020 11: 56 New
          +2
          ..... And in the case, it’s not what Prilepin does ....... First you need to deal with the political regimes in Ukraine, Georgia and the rest, very “greyhounds” like states ....

          That is, do you think that Prilepin and others like him began to deal with the regimes? ...... well, here I think it will definitely not be the case .....
      3. Siberian
        Siberian 7 July 2020 10: 52 New
        0
        This previous edition did not allow anything, but the new one just allows the borders to be changed (in brackets that enclose words about possible demarcations, etc., changing borders)
    3. Civil
      Civil 7 July 2020 07: 56 New
      +3
      How much is political advertising? Where are they pulling? Which oligarchs want to join the Donbass?
    4. NEXUS
      NEXUS 7 July 2020 08: 08 New
      14
      Quote: nPuBaTuP
      Well done Zahar .... respect !!!
      It's time to return these territories home !!!!

      These are cheap show-offs and chatter. They joined Crimea, and how much did the whole country work to reanimate this region? What is proposed, with a hypothetical accession, it will be necessary to bring to the economic state of other regions of the country, and this time, money, economic load on other Russian regions, etc.
      Now, for example, about the PMR ... There is no common border, the standard of living there is much lower than the all-Russian one, and upon accession, the Russian Federation will turn Moldova on itself, and this will entail that we ourselves will push Moldova into NATO hands. And NATO bases will appear not only in Ukraine.
      If we squeeze the territories from our neighbors, it means turning them all against ourselves, which is very beneficial for Washington, it will have a bad effect on our global image, it will not load our economy weakly (and this is so under sanctions).
      As for Abkhazia and Ossetia ... so it was necessary (if there was such a thought) to do in 2008.
      1. Nasrat
        Nasrat 7 July 2020 08: 33 New
        +3
        Clowns promised everything and everyone .... And Donbass and Abkhazia and Belarus and Transnistria wassat Yes, there are promises, they give out wagons, our "fighters" with the "regime" should vote for these clowns ...

        Politicians advocate the liquidation of the Pension Fund of Russia and the payment of pensions from the budget, for the establishment of a retirement age of 60 years, as well as for the right of working pensioners to all allowances, indexation and compensation. In addition, the list of proposals includes a ban on the Unified State Examination, an increase in the number of budget places at universities and the creation of a deposit account for each newborn by a million rubles. Money after reaching the age of 18 offers to spend on training or buying a home.
      2. Polymer
        Polymer 7 July 2020 08: 46 New
        +6
        Quote: NEXUS
        What is proposed, with a hypothetical accession, it will be necessary to bring to the economic state of other regions of the country, and this time, money, economic load on other Russian regions, etc.

        Simply put - the gut is thin. Unfortunately, this is a bitter truth.
        I agree that it is necessary to start not with accession, but with the creation of such a model of the economy that will “pull” the return of territories. But it is difficult and long, because in the beginning it will be necessary to revise the political concept. And at the moment there is none at all.
        True, there is also the law of the transition of quantity into quality - theoretically, this is a more affordable way. But, again, here it is necessary to work not on populist slogans, but on theoretical calculations, so that the transition will turn out in the right quality, and not in the opposite.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 7 July 2020 08: 55 New
          -1
          Quote: Polymer
          But, again, here it is necessary to work not on populist slogans, but on theoretical calculations, so that the transition will turn out in the right quality, and not in the opposite.

          If you return the territory, then not how to chop the tail of a cat in parts. In order to avoid conflict situations, the neighboring republic or state should enter in full force. But this is not a very near future.
          So far, it is possible, albeit in theory, to talk about Belarus joining the single flag of the Russian Federation, and then, as a separate entity, but with a common economy, laws and rights. In other words, something like the old and familiar BSSR, as was the case under the Union, but apparently with more advanced capabilities within the republic, which has its own president. And after all, a precedent, that is ... Tatarstan is then part of the Russian Federation, but with its president. That is, in the case of Belarus, the model is the same as with Tatarstan.
          1. strelokmira
            strelokmira 7 July 2020 09: 08 New
            +6
            They joined Crimea, and how much did the whole country work to reanimate this region? What is proposed, with a hypothetical accession, it will be necessary to bring to the economic state of other regions of the country, and this time, money, economic load on other Russian regions, etc.

            So far, it is possible, albeit in theory, to talk about Belarus joining the single flag of the Russian Federation, and then, as a separate entity, but with a common economy, laws and rights

            An interesting approach, we will not join and develop the poor territories, only the rich will take and feed from them ...
            But thanks for being honest.
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 7 July 2020 09: 14 New
              +3
              Quote: strelokmira
              An interesting approach, we will not join and develop the poor territories, only the rich will take and feed from them ...
              But thanks for being honest.

              Do not ... it is necessary to bite off the neighbors of the territory, setting these neighbors against themselves, but at the same time scream like rabid after-Crimea-ours fellow . At the same time, after crying, that the standard of living is falling throughout the country, and scribbling here that NATO bases in our hallway have grown.
              Crimea was returned because it was originally ours, and those strategic benefits covered all losses both in the economy and in politics. But what we get from joining for example PMR, except for hemorrhoids with both Moldova and a political resonance question.
              This is honest ...
              1. strelokmira
                strelokmira 7 July 2020 09: 40 New
                +3
                Do not ... you have to bite off the neighbors of the territory, setting these neighbors against yourself

                Your neighbors have repeatedly officially announced that they are at war with the Russian Federation, they also published plans to seize the Russian Federation, and in 2014 they killed a Russian citizen on the territory of the Russian Federation ....
                But you do not configure them wink
                At the same time, after crying, that the standard of living is falling across the country

                Those. it is Crimea's fault that the standard of living is falling. And it is strange with a huge territory and the greatest natural wealth can not pull it. Yes, RI could, the USSR could, but our guarantor does not pull
                scribble here that NATO bases in our hallway have grown.

                Well, with your tacit consent, a "dear friend" grew up, who could bring troops into Ukraine in 2014 and put their own government there?
                But what we get from accession, for example, PMR, besides hemorrhoids, both with Moldova and with political resonance is a very big question.

                Well, why do you need the same coal-rich territories of Donbass, it is necessary to mine it, and building infrastructures is not profitable, when you can just pump oil and transfer revenues over a hill
                1. NEXUS
                  NEXUS 7 July 2020 10: 06 New
                  -3
                  Quote: strelokmira
                  Your neighbors have repeatedly officially announced that they are at war with Russia

                  Moldova declared that she was at war with us? What do you smoke there? Or Tajikistan, with Kazakhstan? fool
                  And why are we so bold here towards the former republics ... to walk like that for a walk-we have disputed territories with China. Let's squeeze them from China, huh? Or the thickness of the intestine will not allow?
                  That is, the one who can’t give change, we are robbing, but with the one who can answer, are we friends?
                  I repeat, if you enter the territory of the Russian Federation, then not in parts, but in whole. That is, for example, Belarus, for example. Do not bite off pieces, but introduce it into the Russian Federation, but make it a special subject of the Federation, like Tatarstan. As for Moldova and the PMR, we don’t have common borders.

                  Quote: strelokmira
                  Yes, RI could, the USSR could, but our guarantor does not pull

                  They could ... because they had 30 years of gouging Democrats in power who were ready to sell their mother too, just to grab a penny. Or have you forgotten under whose strict guidance the USSR was slaughtered? So I recall, who were the advisers in the cabinet of the RF Minister during the reign of Pianchugi?
                  Quote: strelokmira
                  Well, with your tacit consent, a "dear friend" grew up, who could bring troops into Ukraine in 2014 and put their own government there?

                  With my consent? In fact, dear, I am a citizen of the Russian Federation. So there I was silent that stupid people came to power in Ukraine?
                  Quote: strelokmira
                  Well, why do you need the same coal-rich territories of Donbass, it is necessary to mine it, and building infrastructures is not profitable, when you can just pump oil and transfer revenues over a hill

                  Get out of the way ... any affiliated region with a million people will be the first years of DOTATION. For this same region will need to be brought to the average level of any other subject of the Federation, with adequate salaries, management, etc. And it doesn’t matter what they mine and pump.
                  For me, from all the former republics, the Tatars turned out to be the most intelligent. The rest, like complete stupid people, ran away, disconnected, made borders ... and the Tatars spat and remained part of the Russian Federation. And now they live not in the example of Moldova or Tajikistan.
          2. CAM
            CAM 7 July 2020 11: 52 New
            +2
            No more president in Tatarstan
        2. mikh-korsakov
          mikh-korsakov 7 July 2020 09: 28 New
          +1
          Polymer! I quote: It’s necessary to start not from joining, but from creating such a model of the economy that will “pull” the return of territories I agree, we just need to start not with creating a "model of the economy", they have invented enough of them, but with creating such an economy when it would be profitable for our and the foreign bourgeoisie to invest in our own territory. And for this, no special model is needed - pure administration with a legal base sufficient for efficiency. By the way, some steps of the modern authorities inspire optimism for me personally. Speculators have inflated the exchange price for gasoline. The government immediately sharply raised the export duty. The year before last, the government of mediocre Medvedev was limited to exhortations, such as "do not raise, or else we will raise duties." Fees did not raise, but prices soared one and a half times. Now, at least for now, if prices are rising, but not one and a half times. Wait and see.
          1. Polymer
            Polymer 7 July 2020 10: 50 New
            +3
            Quote: mikh-korsakov
            One should start not with creating a "model of the economy", they have thought up enough of it, but with creating such an economy when it would be profitable for our and foreign bourgeoisie to invest money on our own territory.

            I talked about practical creation, but I am for a scientific approach, therefore, in the beginning, there must inevitably be theoretical developments and calculations. And with this, it’s very bad so far. The very models that were “invented enough” - there are no firm calculations there. All their suggestions come down to “put on black” or “put on red”.
            As for attracting the bourgeoisie, I do not think this is a good idea. They chase after their profit, and they don’t give a damn about the welfare of the “natives”. Usually like that.
            1. mikh-korsakov
              mikh-korsakov 7 July 2020 11: 36 New
              0
              Sergei! The bourgeoisie, alas, is an indisputable fact - it must be reckoned with. It’s true that they are pursuing profit, but this is precisely the art of administration to curb their appetites - the tools for this have long been known - these are taxes and duties. By the way, by raising duties on gasoline export, our authorities reduced the price increase inside. This is an example. If they continue to act in the same spirit - I am sure - it will become better
              1. Polymer
                Polymer 7 July 2020 11: 41 New
                +3
                Quote: mikh-korsakov
                If they continue to act in the same spirit - I am sure - it will become better

                I'm not sure that it will become better for a long time. This patching of holes will last forever - they will darn in one place, there will be a loophole in another.
                1. mikh-korsakov
                  mikh-korsakov 7 July 2020 13: 08 New
                  0
                  Sergei! Your avatar shows a non-linear structure. What could it be? Essentially a dispute. In Russian conditions, there is no other way than to tax and duties to influence the economy. There is another powerful way of a breakthrough in the economy - it is to attract investment by creating a free economic zone (China), or direct investment in the economy (the post-war German miracle Erhardt). However, these paths were blocked for us. So, yes, darn and patch - because everything else is breaking. They often refer to a breakthrough through technological progress, but this is a very long process, in addition, the domestic Russian market is small, moreover, the world economy has already moved to a new level - and the supply of “miracles” has been captured by the Asians. If we consider revolutionary changes, it took about 12 years to rebuild a much less complex economy after the revolution until the pre-revolutionary level was restored.
                  1. Polymer
                    Polymer 7 July 2020 13: 23 New
                    +2
                    And here is the image on my profile picture?
                    In general, this is a structural model of a polymer molecule ...
        3. New
          New Year day 7 July 2020 12: 05 New
          +3
          Quote: Polymer
          One must begin not with accession, but with the creation of a model of the economy that will “pull” the return of territories.

          this is the most important and the first! Must be an attractive state model
    5. Runoway
      Runoway 7 July 2020 09: 23 New
      +3
      MORNING MONEY-EVENING CHAIRS

      until the SP-2 is launched, there will be no connections!
      1. nPuBaTuP
        nPuBaTuP 7 July 2020 12: 10 New
        0
        Stopudovo :))))
    6. evgenii67
      evgenii67 7 July 2020 09: 25 New
      +2
      Quote: nPuBaTuP
      Well done Zahar .... respect !!!
      It's time to return these territories home !!!!

      Well, here the man is balabol. Although his idea can be used as Tereshkova’s idea of ​​zeroing, it’s rather closer to the election.

      As always, the coin has two sides "The party of Zakhar Prilepin proposed replenishing the Basic Law of the country with a clause on the possibility of accession to the Russian Federation of any territory following the results of referenda both in this territory and in the Russian Federation." if such a thing is legalized, does this party have a guarantee that, according to the same principle, which region as a result of the referendum will not want to secede from Russia? After all, if it’s so easy to enter, then ... well, you understand.
      1. nPuBaTuP
        nPuBaTuP 7 July 2020 12: 11 New
        0
        You can enter, but forgive nizya .....
    7. businessv
      businessv 7 July 2020 12: 42 New
      0
      Quote: nPuBaTuP
      Well done Zahar .... respect !!!

      I always respected Prilepin, but questions have been piling up over the past year. I look forward to comment from the Insurgent first-hand info! hi
    8. minigor
      minigor 7 July 2020 19: 22 New
      +1
      Look who is on the list of his team ... then you will do a great job!
  2. Gardamir
    Gardamir 7 July 2020 06: 31 New
    +6
    Russia needs to hold a referendum
    What did you like the voting ball? And that’s right, we’ll vote on SMS for a month, then at least we’ll join Alaska. Only Prilepin doesn’t care, and if Bourke-Halt-er comes again?
  3. Deniska999
    Deniska999 7 July 2020 06: 36 New
    +8
    There is a federal constitutional law on the possibility of entering new territories. Why more amendments?
    1. Mitroha
      Mitroha 7 July 2020 07: 10 New
      +2
      I am not against joining these republics without any referendum in the Russian Federation. Quite enough results of local referenda and decisions of the Government of the Russian Federation
      And Prilepin, with all due respect, will pay for this referendum from his own pocket or, even without really getting to the authorities, he will waste money on the budget. Why this populism.
  4. Avior
    Avior 7 July 2020 06: 37 New
    14
    For the truth
    for example, does not plan to fight corruption? For better medicine?
    Or so, self-educated hypanut on a fashionable topic?
    1. Anatole Klim
      Anatole Klim 7 July 2020 06: 50 New
      11
      Quote: Avior
      for example, does not plan to fight corruption?

      Here this topic is already occupied, Zakhar was late, here a new anti-corruption was drawn.
      Roman Putin, an entrepreneur and cousin of the president of Russia, was elected chairman and leader of the People Against Corruption party, RIA Novosti reported on Sunday, July 5.
      The decision at the party congress was announced by the chairman of the general political council Grigory Anisimov.
      Inclusion in the party “A successful entrepreneur, public and political figure” will give her a “new impetus” in the implementation of anti-corruption activities and social projects, Anisimov noted.https: //iz.ru/1031834/2020-07-05/dvoiurodnyi-plemiannik-putina-izbran-liderom-partii? utm_source = yxnews & utm_medium = desktop & utm_referrer = https% 3A% 2F% 2Fyandex.ru% 2Fnews
      1. Avior
        Avior 7 July 2020 06: 52 New
        10
        Yeah. Bees against honey.
        I would like to look at an official who demands money from such an entrepreneur.
    2. AU Ivanov.
      AU Ivanov. 7 July 2020 08: 25 New
      +2
      Prilepin is one of the few who provided real assistance to Donbass. And he has every right to such statements.
      1. minigor
        minigor 7 July 2020 19: 26 New
        +1
        His team, lawyers and lawyers, are all Jews!
        See the lists! One Yasin, what is it! In the 90s, he warmed his hands well!
  5. Olegater
    Olegater 7 July 2020 06: 40 New
    +8
    Good morning, dear forum users!

    I believe that this is just such a move that would draw attention to the party and declare itself. No more. In politics, guided by pragmatism - profitable or not profitable. These steps, as proposed now, are NOT FAVORABLE for the current government. There are many reasons for this. Starting with economics and ending with politics.
    1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
      Sidor Amenpodestovich 7 July 2020 07: 00 New
      -6
      Quote: Olegater
      These steps, as proposed now, are NOT FAVORABLE for the current government. There are many reasons for this. Starting with economics and ending with politics.

      Are referendums on the accession of new territories to Russia not beneficial for the current government?
      1. Olegater
        Olegater 7 July 2020 07: 12 New
        +7
        Good morning!
        With respect to your indignation, this is so. Not profitable. Look, what were the snot howls, was the tantrum in the west (upon the return of the Crimea)? Sanctions and a little nipping friends of someone in offshore. Are these affiliations beneficial to this power? These woodpeckers do not want to lose what they plundered and bred, and the official government will get an even bigger headache! So it won’t come out to attach. While the money of those in power and especially the oligarchy in the west. And do not pay attention, dear forum users, to such provocateurs as this leader of the non-party. They are designed to excite the minds for the sake of "hype" and watered. points.
        The return of land, if any, provided that there is no threat to money in the Western accounts of the environment nullified.
        1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
          Sidor Amenpodestovich 7 July 2020 07: 18 New
          -3
          Quote: Olegater
          nibbled a lot of friends on offshore

          Who exactly and how much did they pinch, could you clarify?

          And if "they" are shaking like that for their money, then why did they return Crimea? They would have left everything as it was, and no sanctions and money intact.
          1. Olegater
            Olegater 7 July 2020 07: 45 New
            +7
            Example - Deripaska? Okay, this is on the "surface", you can find the material by "pinching" it yourself. And in Crimea, I can say that I missed the peninsula, then there would have appeared a base with US NATO missiles. And this is not entirely pleasant, agree. Well, the massacre of the Crimean population by the HOFLO fascists. and this is clearly a declaration of war by the lackeys of the West, and inside the population did not understand the authorities refused to defend the Russians. This is just a snap. The conversation can go on for a very long time. A huge number of options !!
            1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
              Sidor Amenpodestovich 7 July 2020 08: 52 New
              -3
              Quote: Olegater
              Example - Deripaska? Okay, this is on the "surface", you can find the material by "pinching" it yourself.

              Are you asking me about Deripaska? That is, you yourself do not know for sure, right?
              On the Internet you can find anything you want. Many will lie, they will take inexpensively, and some so generally for the idea.
              I would like more substantial evidence, but it turns out like the Anglo-Saxons. Either there is evidence, but we will not show it, or in general "high-likly".
              You can slander, slander anyone. But is it worthy of a civilized man, man?
              You can relate to Putin and his entourage in any way, but to humiliate yourself to the level of grandmothers at the entrance is the same as signing in contempt for yourself.
              And in Crimea, I can say that I missed the peninsula, then there would have appeared a base with US NATO missiles.

              But if our elites are already “their” elites, and they are not going to fight with the USA, where they have children and money, then what difference does it make to them, where does the US have naval bases and missiles?
              Well, the massacre of the Crimean population by the HOFLO fascists. and this is clearly a declaration of war by the lackeys of the West, and inside the population did not understand the authorities refused to protect the Russians.

              Again. If they care most about money, then why should they care about the opinion of the people?

              It’s somehow illogical. Here their sanctions are not afraid, but here they are already afraid. "Here we play, here we do not play, but here we wrapped the fish."
              1. Olegater
                Olegater 7 July 2020 09: 36 New
                -1
                I will answer:
                According to the oligarchs. I did not ask, but answered, as an example. Smart, enough hint. The authorities are smart and cynical. They understood the hint.
                Everything that is written in the media and on the Internet needs to be filtered. Separate truth from lies based on your life experience.
                Maybe I did not understand the question?
                Slander against the oligarchy? Do you really think so?
                When their activities are in sight. Evidence is and is covered by all media. By anyone. Yes and more. Deripaska is an example of what will happen if zeroed will act on the likeness of the Crimea.

                For US NATO bases and the elite:
                A big difference, they understand it and very clearly. Just imagine. An enemy base appeared in the Crimea. Clashes of Russians and rabble from Ukraine began. And clashes are inevitable. Perhaps it will go to these bases, like sabotage.
                Will the thinking and caring population of Russia look so calmly at what is going on there? Dissatisfaction with the protests will begin, and as a sign of the silence of the authorities and the oligarchy, lawlessness will become sabotage everywhere, and the elites need the population working for their welfare to allow them to be thrown so?
                You know no worse than me that profit is made by the hands of working people in production ..
                And if this war goes to Russia? Then to all sources of income kirdyk.
                And it’s not the opinion of the people that interests the elite, but the fact that stable pumping will cease due to war. (This scenario is hypothetical! Do not forget).
                I hope that my arguments are reasonable and simple.
                1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
                  Sidor Amenpodestovich 7 July 2020 09: 46 New
                  -3
                  Quote: Olegater
                  Clever, just a hint. The authorities are smart and cynical. They understood the hint.

                  Not understood. A hint of what?
                  1. Olegater
                    Olegater 7 July 2020 09: 54 New
                    -1
                    Hint that it’s not permissible to go beyond certain lines. If the likeness of Crimea will continue, then the elite will be punished, like Deripaska. The lines drawn by the West (summarize) on many issues. So I hope it’s more understandable?
                    Sincerely.
                    1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
                      Sidor Amenpodestovich 7 July 2020 10: 30 New
                      -1
                      That is, the “soft” sanctions for the Crimea are, in a way, a handout to the working class, so that, inspired by this good news, it begins to work twice as well. Thus, the "elite" eliminates the loss due to sanctions profit associated with increased productivity.
                      Did I understand you correctly?
                      1. Olegater
                        Olegater 7 July 2020 10: 48 New
                        +3
                        These "sanctions" are aimed primarily at the elite, the environment in power. Currently, the economy is deciding a lot. And the oligarchs rule the economy, they are given the oligarchs to understand where willfulness ends. Nobody remembers the working people now.
                        And if it is necessary, they will “serve” the handout, don’t show ourselves a little and will work twice, or even three times better, more enthusiastically!

                        And your sarcasm is normal, appreciated.
                      2. Sidor Amenpodestovich
                        Sidor Amenpodestovich 7 July 2020 10: 57 New
                        -1
                        I do not agree with your assessment, but thank you for the polite and calm dialogue.
                        All the best!
                      3. Olegater
                        Olegater 7 July 2020 11: 02 New
                        +2
                        How many people, so many opinions.
                        And thank you for the dialogue. I hope in this regard and we will discuss all topics. All the best!
  6. Sergey Averchenkov
    Sergey Averchenkov 7 July 2020 07: 47 New
    +3
    Probably unprofitable. But you won’t lie against the people. Not so simple.
  • populist
    populist 7 July 2020 07: 54 New
    +2
    Quote: Olegater
    Olegater (Olegater)
    I believe that this is just such a move that would draw attention to the party and declare itself. No more.

    Absolutely.
    This move is designed for a patriotic, but little-informed audience. However, the whole "party" of Prilepin is also designed for this audience. The “party” itself is fake and created to select votes from the left.
    Already there are several such fake remodels created by the authorities for future elections to the State Duma. And Prilepin has long been conducted from the Kremlin. At VO there was a discussion of this next dummy.
    1. Olegater
      Olegater 7 July 2020 08: 03 New
      +1
      Dear forum member PEOPLE!
      Thank you for the addition, concise, capacious, accurate.
      1. populist
        populist 7 July 2020 08: 41 New
        +1
        Always happy hi if my thoughts and knowledge come in handy.
        Let me give you a little from the old discussion. So that respected members of the forum have a true idea of ​​this Prilepin simulacrum.

        The party’s advisers included several very competent and well-known Kremlin propagandists — Sergei Mikheev, Semyon Bogdasarov, Dmitry Kulikov, and others.
  • silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 7 July 2020 06: 55 New
    +9
    The sentence is just a dumb hype ... and it looks very much like a provocation ... especially since the words are worthless ...
    1. Sergey Averchenkov
      Sergey Averchenkov 7 July 2020 07: 43 New
      -6
      Monkey, what is hype?
      1. The popuas
        The popuas 7 July 2020 07: 58 New
        +4
        I’m not a “monkey”, but I’ll answer you, hype is a replay of something popular ...! hi
        1. Sergey Averchenkov
          Sergey Averchenkov 7 July 2020 08: 01 New
          -1
          You are hovering around the capitals ... Sorry for the monkey - it broke.
          1. The popuas
            The popuas 7 July 2020 09: 12 New
            0
            Fortunately, I have little in common with the capital and have never been there
            1. Sergey Averchenkov
              Sergey Averchenkov 7 July 2020 14: 52 New
              0
              Sorry one more time. It happens.
        2. Sidor Amenpodestovich
          Sidor Amenpodestovich 7 July 2020 08: 59 New
          +2
          In the modern sense, “hype” is an unhealthy excitement, often created artificially.
  • Qwertyarion
    Qwertyarion 7 July 2020 07: 03 New
    0
    . replenish the country's Basic Law with a clause on the possibility of accession to the Russian Federation of any territory following the results of referenda both in this territory and in the Russian Federation.

    That is, if, for example, Mongolia passes a similar law and holds a referendum on Russia's accession to Mongolia, then will we all become residents of Mongolia?
    How simple it all turns out .... bully
  • The comment was deleted.
  • zwlad
    zwlad 7 July 2020 07: 13 New
    +6
    Can give them the opportunity to hold their referendum first?
    1. Plastmaster
      Plastmaster 7 July 2020 07: 56 New
      +1
      It will be like in a cartoon about a grandmother. And the US is against.
      1. zwlad
        zwlad 7 July 2020 12: 48 New
        -1
        And them (USA), if that, someone will ask?
  • Sergey Averchenkov
    Sergey Averchenkov 7 July 2020 07: 42 New
    0
    I am for. What else can I say.
  • rocket757
    rocket757 7 July 2020 07: 53 New
    -2
    The new party of the Russian Federation proposes a referendum on the accession of LDNR, Abkhazia and other republics to Russia

    This goal is understandable. COMPLETE DEFECTS, former guides.
    Only we still have a LOT of other imperfections, how to deal with them?
    This is a good reserve, a reason, to get support from people who don’t like it all.
    In general, you have to really look.
  • Plastmaster
    Plastmaster 7 July 2020 07: 54 New
    +1
    It is necessary to call a spade a spade. Not the accession, but the return of the old territories that were part of the founding territory. But if with the same England, then it’s an accession.
    1. AU Ivanov.
      AU Ivanov. 7 July 2020 08: 10 New
      0
      Make Britain a colony of Russia? And what, in London, as Vysotsky sang: "a quarter of our people."
  • DeKo
    DeKo 7 July 2020 08: 01 New
    +2
    New Russia yes. Abkhazia is not. Republic mired in corruption and inaction
  • Boris55
    Boris55 7 July 2020 08: 12 New
    -6
    The basis is this: if 75% of the citizens of a particular territory in a referendum advocate joining Russia,

    That is, they would like, but we would like? Are there too many “how-tos”?
    If someone forgot, then the Donbass in a referendum voted for separation from everyone, for independence of the military leader and from Russia. There was no vote on joining Russia.

    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 7 July 2020 08: 17 New
      +3
      Quote: Boris55
      If someone forgot, then the Donbass in a referendum voted to secede from all and from Russia.

      You distort again. Independence was precisely for separation from Ukraine. After that, the leadership of LDNR asked to consider the issue of joining the Russian Federation.
      1. Boris55
        Boris55 7 July 2020 08: 21 New
        -4
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        After that, the leadership of LDNR asked to consider the issue of joining the Russian Federation.

        The desire of leadership is understandable - it wants to continue to lead, even under the devil, but with a whip ... but what do people think, you know? No, and I don’t know. In order to find out the opinion of the people, you need his vote, which is still not there and this leads to thoughts ...
        1. Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 7 July 2020 08: 40 New
          +3
          Quote: Boris55
          In order to know the opinion of the people-you need his vote, which is still not there and this suggests ...

          Wow.
          "We, the people of the Donetsk People's Republic, according to the results of the referendum held by 11 on May 2014 of the year, and based on the declaration of sovereignty of the DPR, declare that henceforth Donetsk People's Republic is a sovereign state," said Denis Pushilin at a press conference today. .

          “We ask to consider the issue of the entry of the Donetsk People’s Republic into the Russian Federation,” he added.

          1. Boris55
            Boris55 7 July 2020 08: 49 New
            -1
            Quote: mordvin xnumx
            Wow.

            That is, Pushilin is broadcasting from the estate of a people whose opinion did not bother to find out?

            When Putin told them in the 14th not to hold a referendum, did they listen to him? No, so why should we listen to them now?

            The industrial east of Ukraine in terms of population has always surpassed the farm western part. As a whole, Ukraine would never become pro-Western. Any vote has always been for the east of Ukraine.

            Using the mood of the people, the Western intelligence services separated the rebellious region and were able to advance their interests in Ukraine. Before that, they tried for many years, it didn’t work ... Holistic Ukraine has always been drawn to Russia.
            1. Mordvin 3
              Mordvin 3 7 July 2020 08: 58 New
              +5
              Quote: Boris55
              That is, Pushilin is broadcasting from the estate of a people whose opinion did not bother to find out?

              This is a 14 year old. We all perfectly remember the mood of Donbass. In 2017, Zakharchenko announced the creation of Little Russia. According to the same Prilepin, the one watching from Moscow immediately came running and demanded to disavow everything.
              1. Boris55
                Boris55 7 July 2020 09: 08 New
                -8
                Quote: mordvin xnumx
                We all perfectly remember the mood of Donbass.

                Yes, we remember the lines of voting in one and a half open areas to create a picture ...



                Calls to drag Russia into any kind of war are a call to weaken Russia. This is beneficial only to the enemies of Russia.

                Are you ready to die for the people of Donbass, who do not know whether or not they want such happiness? Are you ready to halve your family budget for the sake of restoring Donbass and Ukraine as a whole?

                I’m silent about how many fresh graves will appear in our cemeteries with young guys who died for Prilepin’s ravings ...
                1. Mordvin 3
                  Mordvin 3 7 July 2020 09: 15 New
                  +7
                  Quote: Boris55
                  Are you ready to halve your family budget for the sake of restoring Donbass and Ukraine as a whole?

                  How interesting. Personally, I like the people of Donbass much more than the people of one republic, to which Allah serves.
                  1. Boris55
                    Boris55 7 July 2020 09: 25 New
                    -5
                    Quote: mordvin xnumx
                    Personally, I like the people of Donbass much more

                    Like do not like it - this concept is subjective to politics has no relation whatsoever.

                    Quote: mordvin xnumx
                    Personally, I like the people of Donbass much more than the people of one republic, to which Allah serves.

                    The incitement of inter-religious strife is not permissible. The difference between the right-glorious and the right-loyal is that some praise the right, while others are true to it.
                    1. Mordvin 3
                      Mordvin 3 7 July 2020 09: 27 New
                      +1
                      Quote: Boris55
                      The incitement of inter-religious strife is not permissible.

                      I agree. All people are brothers. Peace, labor, chewing gum! laughing
        2. Plastmaster
          Plastmaster 7 July 2020 09: 46 New
          +1
          Like yes. But how many people have already moved to Russia. Take their opinion into account?
  • Stas34
    Stas34 7 July 2020 08: 14 New
    -1
    Before you obsserat Zakhar and his party, read what they are striving for. Most filthy Zahara, in their lives, did not tie their shoelaces on their own. Read his books, maybe then it will become easier! Populism in Volodya, in Zakhar's case.
  • Igor Pa
    Igor Pa 7 July 2020 08: 26 New
    -2
    Che and then it seems to me that if this happened, then after all the sanctions and other things, the Russians would say no.
  • Guards turn
    Guards turn 7 July 2020 08: 43 New
    +2
    “Here we are, when we talk about Crimea, Kamchatka, Sakhalin, the Kuril Islands ... Yes, Russia will only grow with its territories, returning what was bequeathed to us by the ancestors. And the Constitution directly states that it will grow,” said Alexei Kondratiev, member Federation Council Committee on Foreign Affairs.
  • Baloo
    Baloo 7 July 2020 08: 53 New
    +4
    Residents of these territories themselves must decide their fate, and not political adventurers. For me, the more mundane things are more important than the problems of Prilepin and his party: decent pensions, access to education, not money, decent wages for everyone, not just Chubais and Grefs, and finally, the forest, when we begin to restore forests everywhere, at least manually where the ravines are, landfills, etc. sad yes
  • Maks1995
    Maks1995 7 July 2020 09: 04 New
    +1
    Useless then. The authorities created the buffer territories for good reason.
    No one will change. How then to go with children to USA?
  • mag nit
    mag nit 7 July 2020 09: 11 New
    +2
    It sounds like a toast - "Well, for the truth!".
  • yfast
    yfast 7 July 2020 09: 51 New
    +1
    First you need to join the United States. Then, when the main enemy of our capitalists disappears, we can think about joining the rest.
    1. Fierce73
      Fierce73 7 July 2020 10: 54 New
      0
      Work is already underway! We will join in parts, so for now, our black agents must destroy it to the ground! And then ... Well, you understand
      1. yfast
        yfast 7 July 2020 11: 16 New
        0
        Be careful with work, otherwise tomorrow the Washington newspaper will come out with headlines about managing the movement "only black lives are important, the rest do not care" from our country.
  • Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 7 July 2020 10: 15 New
    0
    If you require the inclusion of all five republics, then this is a failed PR campaign. But if, first, the question of LDNR is raised, then it is completely solvable.
  • Captivity
    Captivity 7 July 2020 10: 17 New
    +2
    Pure populism. Elections on the nose.
  • bad
    bad 7 July 2020 10: 27 New
    +4
    Expected. Someone would have raised this topic anyway.
    1. Siberian
      Siberian 7 July 2020 11: 23 New
      -1
      The question needs to be raised from below, everything Prilepin does right - the people want! People's initiative. A drop is sharpening a stone. And slowly, little by little ... Zaporozhye, Kharkov will already border the Russian Federation. will have a safety net. And so on. Better 40 times once than never 40 times
  • Fierce73
    Fierce73 7 July 2020 10: 52 New
    0
    The author, whether he wants it or not, has posted a rather provocative article! And here's why: the program of the party “For Truth” is a rather large document, but the most hype topics were taken out of context and placed in this article! And half-truth is a lie! If there is a desire, then the link can be found with the party's official theses: https://zapravdu.org/2020/07/06/predvybornaya-programma-politicheskoj-partii-za-pravdu/?fbclid=IwAR1PgAwJAMqcQDFL9wth7PGqkUXOWHgZY9GBIZJFJ4JIJFJ3JFJXNUMXJIJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFXNUMXFJXNUMXJFXNUMXFJXNUMXJFXNUMXFJXNUMXFXNUMXFXNUMXFXNUMXFXNUMXFXNUMXFXNUMXF.
    And the respected people of this site rushed, without checking, without specifying, without deepening their knowledge, to blame! Read, think and write! I think that CONSTRUCTIVE criticism (and suggestions) has not disturbed anyone yet!
    1. businessv
      businessv 7 July 2020 12: 37 New
      +1
      Quote: Fierce73
      I think that CONSTRUCTIVE criticism (and suggestions) has not disturbed anyone yet!

      You are certainly right, but first you need to find out whose project this is, in fact, created a year before the election? Such facts of the creation of parties are always alarming, having previously untwisted its founder on television. Prilepin always respected, but nevertheless, today there are a lot of questions to him. I look forward to comment and opinion of the Insurgent! smile
  • Eskobar
    Eskobar 7 July 2020 10: 58 New
    +2
    Handsome men. Until 2017, Russia alone paid debts to the Paris club, and these people were on the sidelines. I'm not me and not my hut. Now that their independence economies have collapsed over the years of independence, they have been asked back to have grandmas swell in them. What is the only use of them is that their territories will allow the NATO troops to be moved away from the borders.
  • alone
    alone 7 July 2020 11: 06 New
    +1
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    the names of the parties are iconic, for us, the word "truth" was not used. I give the word, even more significant, "conscience."
    Have a feeder.

    It remains to create a party of loafers and gorlopanov and all ..
  • Whirlwind
    Whirlwind 7 July 2020 11: 13 New
    0
    The Americans only need this, so that they could bog down and come to the whole bird of the khan ...
  • Yarik
    Yarik 7 July 2020 11: 16 New
    +5
    but I would definitely not want to see Abkhazians as part of the Russian Federation. A good example of their attitude towards our tourists and arrogant. greyhound stay in our country. Let them determine their own being, without our participation.
  • Comrade Michael
    Comrade Michael 7 July 2020 11: 53 New
    -2
    The authorities will not do anything like that. They will not allow anyone to take any serious decisions. And your party, they organized it for the jackdaw .... The Russians love only Putin and United Russia (well, or any party that the authorities will offer) ... But I personally do not need anything except my village. Fight for the rest yourself.
    1. Anatoly Tuponoga
      Anatoly Tuponoga 7 July 2020 13: 44 New
      +1
      Mikhail you sniffed gunpowder and you will protect the village
      1. Comrade Michael
        Comrade Michael 9 July 2020 22: 32 New
        0
        Nobody has ever attacked or attacks me. Neither in the 90s, nor now .... I calmly walked on my land when the frightened townsfolk were sitting under the bed .... No need to kindle psychosis among citizens. And I will not defend the village, I have no friends outside the inner circle. I protect my home and family. You didn’t finish playing soldiers?
  • Alexander X
    Alexander X 7 July 2020 12: 27 New
    -1
    Assuming that "this is a good reason" ©, we can conclude that this is a test ball for the unification of Russian lands ... And we must bear in mind that in the Prilepin party, in my opinion, certain guidelines are given regarding what they declare and what to fight for, because old-living parties already cause irritation among ordinary people .... IMHO ...
    1. doubovitski
      doubovitski 9 July 2020 01: 03 New
      0
      Quote: Alexander X
      Assuming that "this is a good reason" ©, we can conclude that this is a test ball for the unification of Russian lands ... And we must bear in mind that in the Prilepin party, in my opinion, certain guidelines are given regarding what they declare and what to fight for, because old-living parties already cause irritation among ordinary people .... IMHO ...

      The actions of these mongrels give trump cards to our enemies. The situation is relatively calm there now and, of course, the war in the event of our movement there.
  • Nitarius
    Nitarius 7 July 2020 12: 29 New
    0
    ohh damn)) I understand the movement went)))
  • businessv
    businessv 7 July 2020 12: 32 New
    +1
    According to the proposal contained in the election program of the party "For Truth", in Russia it is necessary to hold a referendum on the inclusion of the above-mentioned republics in Russia.
    To begin with, we should hold a referendum on creating a financial base for “ensuring the implementation of Russia's foreign policy, for which we propose: dispossessing of oligarchs, nationalizing budget-forming enterprises, all mining and oil refining complexes, defense industry enterprises and other illegally privatized enterprises with clarification of the reasons and punishment of all involved to this action of members! "
  • Anatoly Tuponoga
    Anatoly Tuponoga 7 July 2020 13: 41 New
    -3
    it’s time to join the named republics there is a desire of the whole people
  • senima56
    senima56 7 July 2020 14: 07 New
    -3
    The West will always bark! Regardless of whether we join or not. Let then already "barks" due to the fact that they joined! You are giving a referendum in LDNR, South Ossetia (South Ossetia), Abkhazia and the Transnistrian Moldavian Republic (PMR)! Give me accession!
  • 7,62h54
    7,62h54 7 July 2020 14: 24 New
    0
    Then immediately list California and Alaska.
  • Old26
    Old26 7 July 2020 15: 39 New
    +3
    Quote: orionvitt
    This is primarily the return of illegally seized territories in 1991.

    And which territories were illegally torn away from Russia in 1991. the same populism as the statements of Prilepin

    Quote: orionvitt
    First you need to deal with political regimes in Ukraine, Georgia and the rest, very "greyhound" type of state. To make Russia's position stronger in relation to Europe and the USA.

    Dismantling with political regimes will not lead to anything good. But to make Russia economically more developed (powerful) so that the neighbors "want" to be with it in the Union is another. And if your economy is not among the first at least 20 economies in the world, no one will particularly reckon with you

    Quote: Runoway
    until the SP-2 is launched, there will be no connections!

    And then in the coming decades too. One must still not look through the pink glasses at the whole world

    "The party of Zakhar Prilepin proposed replenishing the Basic Law of the country with a clause on the possibility of accession to the Russian Federation of any territory following the results of referenda both in this territory and in the Russian Federation."

    What about the referendum in the country that previously owned these territories?

    Quote: AU Ivanov.
    Prilepin is one of the few who provided real assistance to Donbass. And he has every right to such statements.

    No one denies his help to Donbass. But making such populist statements is a game for the public, and not on her minds, but on her emotions

    Quote: orionvitt
    Ukraine will not sail anywhere. NATO has its own problems above the roof, except to balance a poor country with an army armed with Soviet weapons 30-40 years ago. And even that, for the most part, is either sold or in poor condition. Georgia did not leave, although there was talk of figs. They do not need NATO, they are needed only as food for the political ambitions of the West.

    Georgia did not leave NATO due to territorial disputes (South Ossetia, Abkhazia). Need to accept Ukraine into NATO-will. By its power, the Ukrainian army surpasses any of the three (but rather all together) Baltic countries. But nothing. They were admitted to NATO, despite the fact that they do not have an aircraft, nor a fleet, and the armed forces are a parody in terms of quantity and quality.

    Quote: Stas34
    Populism in Volodya, in Zakhar's case.

    Both have enough populism. GDP is the one that even in power should “filter the bazaar,” and Prilepin’s “shallow Emelya is your week”

    Quote: Siberian
    The question needs to be raised from below, everything Prilepin does right - the people want! People's initiative. A drop is sharpening a stone. And slowly, little by little ... Zaporozhye, Kharkov will already border the Russian Federation. will have a safety net. And so on. Better 40 times once than never 40 times

    The popular initiative is good before the election. The rest of the time they spit on her. Moreover, in unitary Ukraine there are not even close provisions in the Constitution on the exit of its individual areas. They (regions) do not possess autonomy.
    And Kharkov has been bordering Russia for 3 decades already (after the collapse of the Union). . Zaporozhye and close to the borders of Russia is not worth it. So the hedge is exclusively in your thoughts. If at least a humcon convoy can be sent to the Kharkiv region, if anything - to Zaporizhzhya - ... refresh your knowledge of geography

    Quote: Fierce73
    The author, whether he wants it or not, has posted a rather provocative article! And here's why: the program of the party “For Truth” is a rather large document, but the most hype topics were taken out of context and placed in this article! And half-truth is a lie! If there is a desire, then the link can be found with the party's official theses: https://zapravdu.org/2020/07/06/predvybornaya-programma-politicheskoj-partii-za-pravdu/?fbclid=IwAR1PgAwJAMqcQDFL9wth7PGqkUXOWHgZY9GBIZJFJ4JIJFJ3JFJXNUMXJIJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFJXNUMXJFXNUMXFJXNUMXJFXNUMXFJXNUMXJFXNUMXFJXNUMXFXNUMXFXNUMXFXNUMXFXNUMXFXNUMXFXNUMXF.
    And the respected people of this site rushed, without checking, without specifying, without deepening their knowledge, to blame! Read, think and write! I think that CONSTRUCTIVE criticism (and suggestions) has not disturbed anyone yet!

    You have in vain posted a link to the party program. After reading it, you understand that what was in the article is a trifle compared to the populism in the program. The wildest mixture, designed to influence not even the minds, but emotions. Reading it - this is how you see the books of Maxim Kalashnikov (in style)

    3. Recognition of the actual expansion of the territory of Russian civilization. We stand for the immediate recognition of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR), Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR), the Transnistrian Moldavian Republic (PMR) and, according to the results of referenda, their inclusion in Russia. We stand for the immediate, according to the results of referenda, accession to the Russian Federation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia on the rights of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. We are in favor of building a full-fledged Union State of Russia and Belarus with the formation of common authorities, a common budget and the establishment of the ruble as a single currency.

    That is, chop off part of the territory from other states, and immediately.

    4. The formation of the belt of friendly states.

    Having completed the previous paragraph, we will receive a belt of states that will immediately become NATO members, and instead of a friendly belt, we will receive a belt of hostilities ... Yes, NATO should say thanks to Prilepin for such a gift ...

    III. EMPIRE
    15 One of the priorities should be a security regime along the perimeter of the borders of Russia. Along the perimeter of our borders should be either friendly and allied states that recognize Russia's special civilizational role in the world, or neutral. To ensure the security of our and our allies, we abandon the principle of non-interference in the affairs of other states.

    That is, the aggressiveness of our country is declared in advance. And after that, Prilepin and his party are hoping for a "belt of friendly states?"

    If the rights of our compatriots are violated in another country, the response from Russia should not be mirror but asymmetric, up to economic sanctions and deportation of Russian citizens from Russia

    Yeah. Here in the Baltic States infringe on the rights of our citizens. What economic sanctions can we apply against them? Is there a significant turnover so that we can "hit the ruble"? And deporting the Baltic states is generally enchanting. as if they were shoals coming to us to get a job ...

    We propose introducing a “Children's Million”: a deposit account must be opened for each newborn in a state bank or state investment fund with the possibility of using these funds after 18 years for education, purchase of housing, and other purposes agreed with the relevant state bodies.

    Another populist version of Income in the Russian budget EMNIP in 2019 was a little more than 20 trillion rubles. The number of births is 1,25 million children. That is, the "children's million" is 1,25 trillion rubles out of 20 trillion in revenue. But they still talk about increasing the income of scientists, doctors, teachers, cultural workers, etc. etc. Ah, I forgot pensioners ...

    The costs of state cultural policy should be increased significantly. In terms of people, Russia spends per year on culture — about 4000 rubles. And you need to spend 10-15 times more — more than 50 thousand rubles per person

    Another 7 trillion ...

    Cultural centers in each region of the country should become the key agent for promoting culture, which should create a vast cultural space and ensure the creation of various cultural products and values.

    But aren't they? In each regional and regional center there are such structures. They are called differently, but there are. But he doesn’t seem to know this. Plus there are separate cultural heritage structures. In the Stavropol Territory, this is, for example, Cossacks-Nekrasovites ...
  • lot
    lot 7 July 2020 18: 35 New
    +3
    First I attached brains to the head. New party.
  • Frol Agripa
    Frol Agripa 7 July 2020 22: 19 New
    +2
    Prilepin-cleaved to the feeder, and begins to carry garbage for his PR! Mediocrity and opportunist!
  • Vladimir Nizhegorodsky
    Vladimir Nizhegorodsky 8 July 2020 19: 10 New
    0
    Zakhar Prilepin good luck and success !!!
    And so that the party was really "FOR THE TRUTH !!!"
    You look and people wake up.
  • doubovitski
    doubovitski 9 July 2020 00: 41 New
    0
    Comrade Prilepin went into business; he was clearly not up to the task. To write stories with stories about Natsik’s atrocities and the adventures of agents on enemy territory, and the organization of a political party .... Throw ideas that are not possible to implement at present, moreover, with dubious benefits if successful, and certainly, getting a slap in the face case NOT success. To hand over to the enemies of Russia trump cards in accusing the annexations of territories. A weak argument in a dispute arms an opponent. It is necessary not to mince, in a hurry to collect such a LOT, but to wait, choosing the moment, and, possibly, the ONLY killing one on the spot. As happened with the Crimea. This is a solid action, justified, and gave tremendous benefits. What will Transnistria give us? We won’t get the advantages of the Kaliningrad region. But the trouble of an enclave with an isolated territory is comprehensive.
  • Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 9 July 2020 02: 58 New
    +1
    First, you need to take all the "Ukrainians" out of there, and the Russians are always welcome.
  • Comrade Michael
    Comrade Michael 9 July 2020 22: 38 New
    0
    Kindergarten .... And in the comments and this party ...