The new party of the Russian Federation proposes a referendum on the accession of LDNR, Abkhazia and other republics to Russia

Not so long ago, the formed party “For Truth”, led by Zakhar Prilepin, came up with a proposal on Russia's future political attitude towards unrecognized and partially recognized republics. We are talking about the Lugansk and Donetsk people's republics, as well as South Ossetia (South Ossetia), Abkhazia and the Transnistrian Moldavian Republic (PMR).

According to the proposal contained in the election program of the party “For Truth”, in Russia it is necessary to hold a referendum on the inclusion of the above-mentioned republics in Russia. At the same time, the party of Zakhar Prilepin proposed replenishing the Basic Law of the country with a clause on the possibility of accession to the Russian Federation of any territory following the results of referenda both in this territory and in the Russian Federation.

The basis is this: if 75% of the citizens of a territory in a referendum advocate joining Russia, then, on the basis of the will of the citizens of the Russian Federation, such a territory can become part of our country. The option of joining the rights of a subject of the federation is mentioned (by analogy with the Crimea and Sevastopol).

Additionally, the program of Zakhar Prilepin speaks of the need to create a full-fledged Union of Russia and Belarus. “For Truth” proposes to create such an alliance with unified authorities, currency and budget.

A reaction is expected from the authorities of Belarus and the above republics to those initiatives that are spelled out in the program of the new Russian political force.

Comments

[nPuBaTuP]

Well done Zahar .... respect !!!
It's time to return these territories home !!!!

[Finches]

This is called populism! But they’re swimming a bit shallow - you need to start with the return of Alaska - the Americans didn’t save a hundred pounds of the purchase receipt ...

[Graz]

they didn’t seem to pay half for it in the end under the contract of sale, in fact of non-payment it is a priori insignificant

[ork_333]

Enough of procrastinating this Alaska! She sold, sold! Forget all sorts of conspiracy theories and other dregs. The Americans did not want to buy it, because they did not see the value in it. And to us its content, in such a distance from the main part of the country, cost a pretty penny. So at that time its sale was justified on all counts.

[zadorin1974]

Prior I completely agree with you. Alaska for Russia was and will be a suitcase without a handle. We now only bring the main roads on our territory to the pro-ancient level by 60%.
Now consider this version of history. Theoretically, Alaska was a part of RI by 1917. There is a revolution and a civil war. Do you think that the Bolsheviks would succeed in holding Alaska as well? All the forces of the White movement would flock to its territory, and not be spread to the world. As a result, we would get the most hostile state on our border (Poland, crying, smoking aside). This, of course, is a theory.

[Eugene Kodola]

All that lies bad along our borders is to attach! At least in order to create buffer zones!

[snake]

Quote: Eugene Kodola

All that lies bad along our borders is to attach!

The expansionist militarist is ordinary. Couch.

[nPuBaTuP]

Yes, all the forces of the White movement would flock to its territory, and not spread out around the world

Well, they did not flock to Chukotka or Wrangel Island .....
By the way, read about the development of the island by the Soviet government .... you will find a lot of interesting things .... so that the Bolsheviks could squeeze out and hold Alaska ....

[mikh-korsakov]

With all due respect to Prilepin's talent - but in vain he is. He can propose something for the red words, whatever comes to mind, knowing that his party will never fall into power. Here, some with sarcasm offered to demand from the Americans Alaska. And I would go further. I would demand Hawaii by this logic. In fact, many islands there were discovered by the Russian navigator Lisyansky. And the climate is better there, and the inhabitants are more fun.

[Vend]

Quote: mikh-korsakov

With all due respect to Prilepin's talent - but in vain he is. He can propose something for the red words, whatever comes to mind, knowing that his party will never fall into power. Here, some with sarcasm offered to demand from the Americans Alaska. And I would go further. I would demand Hawaii by this logic. In fact, many islands there were discovered by the Russian navigator Lisyansky. And the climate is better there, and the inhabitants are more fun.

Yes, it seems like populism to attract supporters. Harbors should not be required; they are not legally occupied by the United States. I think Hawaii would not refuse to become an independent state.

[Mavrikiy]

Quote: Finches

This is called populism! But they swim a little shallow - you need to start with the return of Alaska

MikroZhirik dreams of glory.
How pathetic our oligarch oligophrenics are trying to offer an alternative to Putin in the most colorful wrappers. Udaltsov, Navalny, Grudinin, ... now also Prilepin.

1 United Russia Dmitry Medvedev, Sergei Neverov
2 Communist Party of the Russian Federation Gennady Zyuganov
3 Liberal Democratic Party of Russia Vladimir Zhirinovsky
4 Patriots of Russia Gennady Semigin
5 Russian United Democratic Party Yabloko Grigory Yavlinsky
6 Just Russia Sergei Mironov
7 Party of Growth Boris Titov
8 People's Freedom Party Mikhail Kasyanov
9 Democratic Party of Russia DPR Timur Bogdanov
10 People's Party "For Women of Russia"
11 Green Alliance Aleksandr Zakondyrin
12 Union of Citizens SG Vyacheslav Smirnov
13 People's Party of Russia Andrey Bogdanov Stanislav Aranovich
14 Citizenship Andrei Poda
15 Social Democratic Party of Russia by Andrey Bogdanov Sirazdin Ramazanov
16 Communist Party of Social Justice CPSU Andrey Bogdanov
17 All-Russian political party "Party of Pensioners of Russia" Nikolai Chebotarev
18 Cities of Russia Yuri Babak
19 Party of Free Citizens Party of Citizens Pavel Sklyanchuk
20 Russian Ecological Party "The Greens" Anatoly Panfilov
21 Communists of Russia Maxim Suraikin
22 Agrarian Party of Russia Olga Bashmachnikova Vladimir Plotnikov
23 Russian People's Union Sergey Baburin
24 Party for Justice! Ponomarenko V.S.
25 Social Protection Party
26 Civil Force Kirill Bykanin
27 Russian Party of Pensioners for Social Justice Vladimir Burakov
28 People's Alliance Andrey Bogdanov, Olga Anishchenko
29 Monarchist Party Anton Bakov
30 Civic Platform Rifat Shaikhutdinov
31 "FAIR" Alexey Zolotukhin
32 Labor Party of Russia Sergei Vostretsov
33 Against all Pavel Mikhalchenkov
34 Russian Socialist Party Sergei Cherkashin
35 Party of Russian Veterans Ildar Rezyapov
36 Russian United Labor Front Viktor Tyulkin
37 Party of Affairs Konstantin Babkin
38 Motherland Alexey Zhuravlev
39 Union of Labor Alexander Shershukov
40 Women's Dialogue Elena Semerikova
41 Village Revival Party
42 Defenders of the Fatherland Nikolai Sobolev
43 Cossack Party of the Russian Federation Nikolai Konstantinov
44 Development of Russia Alexey Kaminsky
45 Democratic Legal Russia Igor Trunov
46 Great Fatherland Party Igor Ashmanov, de facto Nikolai Starikov
47 Russian Party of Gardeners Igor Kasyanov
48 Party of Change Party "GRANI" Andrey Nechaev
49 Russian Renaissance Party Viktor Arkhipov
50 National course Andrey Kovalenko
51 People against corruption Grigory Anisimov
52 Native Party Sergei Orlov Nadezhda Demidova
53 International Party of Russia Zuleikhat Ulybasheva
54 Party of Social Reforms Stanislav Polishchuk
55 United Party of Disabled People of Russia Vladimir Maltsev
56 Party of Good Deeds, Protection of Children, Women, Freedom, Nature and Pensioners Andrey Kirillov
57 Revival of Agrarian Russia Vasily Krylov
58 Alternative for Russia (Party of Socialist Choice) (formerly Smena, Support Party) Antonina Serova
59 Parents of the Future Party Marina Voronova
60 Small Business Party of Russia
61 People's Patriotic Party of Russia - Power to the People

In the names of the parties, the symbolic word for us was not used. I give an even more significant word, "conscience".
Have a feeder.

[nikon7717]

I always look at the huge number of these parties and the ego of their founders. Instead of combining, more and more are crushed. They would have to merge, collect voters in their heaps, develop common platforms, and they ... Divide them and rule the puppeteer. Yes, and their goals in most cases, populism and snatch from the feeder. Although if the union had passed more forces there would have been an impact on the feeding trough.

[New Year day]

Quote: Finches

This is called populism!

For the first time I agree with Zyablitsov! If a fan of zeroing thinks so, then it is.
In the fall, perhaps, elections to the State Duma. Everyone started to fuss. Soon they will indeed announce

Quote: Finches

from the return of Alaska

By the way, Aleuts consider themselves Russian

[mikh-korsakov]

Sylvester! I agree with you. There is one remark about "the Aleuts consider themselves Russian". These are Aleuts or Eskimos, there are very few of them left, or Anglo-Saxons. These do not consider themselves Russians. As for the Eskimos, it is possible that a legend has been preserved among the people that once white bearded people sailed and brought fiery water - especially holoso.

[210ox]

That's exactly populism. Do the residents of these republics want to join the Russian Federation? For example, the same Abkhazia. They adapted well. They receive finances from Moscow, they organized anarchy there, they don’t want to restore order.

[nPuBaTuP]

Get finances from Moscow,

So, I think that if we start to cut back on the finances we receive a little, then I think they will crush anarchy too and will be asked to Russia .....

[NordUral]

Populism is just Alaska.

[Finches]

Alaska is sarcasm!

[NordUral]

So thin.

[Souchastnik]

Americans didn’t keep a hundred poods of a purchase receipt ...

Do you have a contract of sale, or lease? If yes, then urgently to court.
Return, my friend, immediately return

[Interlocutor]

hundred poods Americans did not save the purchase receipt

That damn it will be - saved. Somewhere, in a bank, lies in a cell.

[Finches]

Anglo-Saxons can!

[Fan]

Quote: Finches

This is called populism! But they’re swimming a bit shallow - you need to start with the return of Alaska - the Americans didn’t save a hundred pounds of the purchase receipt ...

Definitely, Zakhar went to the wrong steppe .... Who wished him a question.
Alaska is more globally Eugene (it is proved that Indians are direct descendants of immigrants from Russia (Yakuts Khanty, Chukchi, etc.) !!! From Japan you need to shake Kolchak's gold with interest, etc.
In general, such topics are better not to raise, but to join quietly, etc.
Most often, populism leads to big blood .. But in Russia we don’t need this

[SOVIET UNION 2]

And will the amended constitution violate the territorial integrity of Russia? This is a change of boundaries!

[Tusv]

Quote: SOVIET UNION 2

And will the amended constitution violate the territorial integrity of Russia? This is a change of boundaries!

No, you can’t alienate your territories, but you can demarcate strangers

[Ingvar 72]

So if you rest against the letter of the law, then you can demarcate your own.

[New Year day]

Quote: Tusv

No, you can’t alienate your territories, but you can demarcate strangers

the law is like a drawbar, where do you turn it?

[Fan]

Quote: Tusv

Quote: SOVIET UNION 2

And will the amended constitution violate the territorial integrity of Russia? This is a change of boundaries!

No, you can’t alienate your territories, but you can demarcate strangers

I would rather say restore the borders of Russia! Many will not like this, but each of its difficult periods in the history of Russia has recovered within its borders and has become even stronger ....
All this usually happened voluntarily ...

[orionvitt]

Quote: SOVIET UNION 2

This is a change of boundaries!

This is primarily the return of the illegally seized territories in 1991. This is so by the way. And on business, Prilepin is not doing it. As the saying goes, "drives the horses." First you need to deal with the political regimes in Ukraine, Georgia and other, strongly "greyhound" type of states. To make Russia's position stronger in relation to Europe and the United States. And then you can already think about the return of territories, referenda and so on. And today, such an initiative looks like an outright provocation. All in good time

[New Year day]

Quote: orionvitt

This is primarily a comeback illegally seized territories in 1991 year.

specify your position. Do you make territorial claims to your neighbors?

[orionvitt]

Quote: Silvestr

Do you make territorial claims to your neighbors?

For a start, by and large, these are a souvenir type of state that appeared solely due to the weakening of the central government. There were no historical prerequisites for their emergence. (Like the strengthening of national cultures, people's liberation wars, the history of statehood, etc.) So the time comes to correct the political mistakes of the past. If the "neighbors" who profited at the expense of the Soviet Union do not like something, this is their problem. By the way, I myself live, as you say, on the territory of the "neighbors". And believe me, I'm fed up.

[New Year day]

Quote: orionvitt

If the "neighbors" who profited at the expense of the Soviet Union do not like something, this is their problem.

those. you are making territorial claims against neighboring states. Motivation is indifferent.
Do you think you will take only land or with the population? What will you do with those who disagree? Does this remind you of the actions of one master to free the Aryan lands?

[orionvitt]

Not reminiscent of. Since the technique of returning lands with the Aryan population from a certain master, as you say, implied the destruction of another part of the population, not the Aryan. What Russia has never done. And in general, your comparison of the methods of Nazi Germany and the USSR is inappropriate. So you agree that the Soviet Union, along with Germany, is responsible for the Second World War.

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: orionvitt

it says "drives the horses." First, you need to deal with the political regimes in Ukraine, Georgia and the rest, strongly "greyhound" type of state. Make Russia's position stronger in relation to Europe and

Well, the flag is in your hands. You read, so everyone knows how to do it, but for some reason no one does, only teaches.

[orionvitt]

Quote: Krasnoyarsk

You read, so everyone knows how to do it, but for some reason no one does, only teaches

Only cats will be born quickly, as Bender said. When the right moment has ripened, Crimea was returned instantly. Politics, this is not only chopping the shoulder, but very often, the ability to wait.

[New Year day]

Quote: orionvitt

When the right moment has ripened, Crimea was returned instantly

how did they return it? The feeling is that the Crimeans stood aside and watched the return. Are you guaranteeing the same impulse in the "occupied territories"?

[Krasnoyarsk]

Quote: Silvestr

but how was it returned?

Sylvester, you are right, to say - "Crimea returned" is somewhat wrong.
There was a mutual desire, for Russia, to return Crimea, and for Crimea, to return to Russia. And without this mutual desire, I’m not sure that anything would have worked out.

[nPuBaTuP]

..... And in the case, Prilepin is doing the wrong thing ....... First you need to deal with the political regimes in Ukraine, Georgia and others, strongly "greyhound" type of states ....

That is, do you think that Prilepin and others like him began to deal with the regimes? ...... well, here I think it will definitely not be the case .....

[Siberian]

This previous edition did not allow anything, but the new one just allows the borders to be changed (in brackets that enclose words about possible demarcations, etc., changing borders)

[Civil]

How much is political advertising? Where are they pulling? Which oligarchs want to join the Donbass?

[NEXUS]

Quote: nPuBaTuP

Well done Zahar .... respect !!!
It's time to return these territories home !!!!

These are cheap show-offs and chatter. They joined Crimea, and how much did the whole country work to reanimate this region? What is proposed, with a hypothetical accession, it will be necessary to bring to the economic state of other regions of the country, and this time, money, economic load on other Russian regions, etc.
Now, for example, about the PMR ... There is no common border, the standard of living there is much lower than the all-Russian one, and upon accession, the Russian Federation will turn Moldova on itself, and this will entail that we ourselves will push Moldova into NATO hands. And NATO bases will appear not only in Ukraine.
If we squeeze the territories from our neighbors, it means turning them all against ourselves, which is very beneficial for Washington, it will have a bad effect on our global image, it will not load our economy weakly (and this is so under sanctions).
As for Abkhazia and Ossetia ... so it was necessary (if there was such a thought) to do in 2008.

[Nasrat]

Clowns promised everything and everyone .... And Donbass and Abkhazia and Belarus and Transnistria Yes, there are promises, they are distributed in wagons, our "fighters" against the "regime" must vote for these clowns ...

Politicians advocate the liquidation of the Russian Pension Fund and the payment of pensions from the budget, for setting the retirement age at 60 years, as well as for the right of working pensioners to all allowances, indexation and compensation. In addition, the list of proposals includes a ban on the USE, an increase in the number of budget-funded places in universities and the creation of a deposit account for each newborn for a million rubles. Money after reaching the age of 18 is offered to be spent on education or purchase of housing.

[Polymer]

Quote: NEXUS

What is proposed, with a hypothetical accession, it will be necessary to bring to the economic state of other regions of the country, and this time, money, economic load on other Russian regions, etc.

Simply put - the gut is thin. Unfortunately, this is a bitter truth.
I agree that it is necessary to start not with the accession, but with the creation of such a model of the economy that will "pull" the return of territories. But this is difficult and time-consuming, because in the beginning the political concept will also have to be revised. And there is none at the moment.
True, there is also the law of the transition of quantity into quality - theoretically, this is a more affordable way. But, again, here it is necessary to work not on populist slogans, but on theoretical calculations, so that the transition will turn out in the right quality, and not in the opposite.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Polymer

But, again, here it is necessary to work not on populist slogans, but on theoretical calculations, so that the transition will turn out in the right quality, and not in the opposite.

If you return the territory, then not how to chop the tail of a cat in parts. In order to avoid conflict situations, the neighboring republic or state should enter in full force. But this is not a very near future.
So far, it is possible, albeit in theory, to talk about Belarus joining the single flag of the Russian Federation, and then, as a separate entity, but with a common economy, laws and rights. In other words, something like the old and familiar BSSR, as was the case under the Union, but apparently with more advanced capabilities within the republic, which has its own president. And after all, a precedent, that is ... Tatarstan is then part of the Russian Federation, but with its president. That is, in the case of Belarus, the model is the same as with Tatarstan.

[strelokmira]

They joined Crimea, and how much did the whole country work to reanimate this region? What is proposed, with a hypothetical accession, it will be necessary to bring to the economic state of other regions of the country, and this time, money, economic load on other Russian regions, etc.

So far, it is possible, albeit in theory, to talk about Belarus joining the single flag of the Russian Federation, and then, as a separate entity, but with a common economy, laws and rights

An interesting approach, we will not join and develop the poor territories, only the rich will take and feed from them ...
But thanks for being honest.

[NEXUS]

Quote: strelokmira

An interesting approach, we will not join and develop the poor territories, only the rich will take and feed from them ...
But thanks for being honest.

Do not ... it is necessary to bite off the neighbors of the territory, setting these neighbors against themselves, but at the same time scream like rabid after-Crimea-ours . At the same time, after crying, that the standard of living is falling throughout the country, and scribbling here that NATO bases in our hallway have grown.
Crimea was returned because it was originally ours, and those strategic benefits covered all losses both in the economy and in politics. But what we get from joining for example PMR, except for hemorrhoids with both Moldova and a political resonance question.
This is honest ...

[strelokmira]

Do not ... you have to bite off the neighbors of the territory, setting these neighbors against yourself

Your neighbors have repeatedly officially announced that they are at war with the Russian Federation, they also published plans to seize the Russian Federation, and in 2014 they killed a Russian citizen on the territory of the Russian Federation ....
But you do not configure them

At the same time, after crying, that the standard of living is falling across the country

Those. it is Crimea's fault that the standard of living is falling. And it is strange with a huge territory and the greatest natural wealth can not pull it. Yes, RI could, the USSR could, but our guarantor does not pull

scribble here that NATO bases in our hallway have grown.

Well, with your tacit consent, the "dear friend" grew up, who could 2014 send troops to Ukraine and put their government there?

But what we get from accession, for example, PMR, besides hemorrhoids, both with Moldova and with political resonance is a very big question.

Well, why do you need the same coal-rich territories of Donbass, it is necessary to mine it, and building infrastructures is not profitable, when you can just pump oil and transfer revenues over a hill

[NEXUS]

Quote: strelokmira

Your neighbors have repeatedly officially announced that they are at war with Russia

Moldova declared that she was at war with us? What do you smoke there? Or Tajikistan, with Kazakhstan?
And why are we so bold here towards the former republics ... to walk like that for a walk-we have disputed territories with China. Let's squeeze them from China, huh? Or the thickness of the intestine will not allow?
That is, the one who can’t give change, we are robbing, but with the one who can answer, are we friends?
I repeat, if you enter the territory of the Russian Federation, then not in parts, but in whole. That is, for example, Belarus, for example. Do not bite off pieces, but introduce it into the Russian Federation, but make it a special subject of the Federation, like Tatarstan. As for Moldova and the PMR, we don’t have common borders.

Quote: strelokmira

Yes, RI could, the USSR could, but our guarantor does not pull

They could ... because they had 30 years of gouging Democrats in power who were ready to sell their mother too, just to grab a penny. Or have you forgotten under whose strict guidance the USSR was slaughtered? So I recall, who were the advisers in the cabinet of the RF Minister during the reign of Pianchugi?

Quote: strelokmira

Well, with your tacit consent, the "dear friend" grew up, who could 2014 send troops to Ukraine and put their government there?

With my consent? In fact, dear, I am a citizen of the Russian Federation. So there I was silent that stupid people came to power in Ukraine?

Quote: strelokmira

Well, why do you need the same coal-rich territories of Donbass, it is necessary to mine it, and building infrastructures is not profitable, when you can just pump oil and transfer revenues over a hill

Get out of the way ... any affiliated region with a million people will be the first years of DOTATION. For this same region will need to be brought to the average level of any other subject of the Federation, with adequate salaries, management, etc. And it doesn’t matter what they mine and pump.
For me, from all the former republics, the Tatars turned out to be the most intelligent. The rest, like complete stupid people, ran away, disconnected, made borders ... and the Tatars spat and remained part of the Russian Federation. And now they live not in the example of Moldova or Tajikistan.

[CAM]

No more president in Tatarstan

[mikh-korsakov]

Polymer! I quote: it is necessary to start not with annexation, but with the creation of a model of the economy that will "pull" the return of territories I agree that we just need to start not with the creation of an "economic model", they have been invented enough, but with the creation of such an economy when it would be profitable for our and the foreign bourgeoisie to invest money on their own territory. And for this, no special model is needed - clean administration with a legal base sufficient for efficiency. By the way, some of the steps taken by the modern authorities inspire optimism to me personally. The speculators have inflated the exchange price of gasoline. The government immediately sharply raised the export duty. The year before last, the government of mediocre Medvedev limited itself to exhortations, such as "do not raise, or we will raise duties." The duties were not raised, but prices soared by half. Now, at least for now, if prices are growing, but not by half. Wait and see.

[Polymer]

Quote: mikh-korsakov

it is necessary to start not with the creation of a "model of the economy", they have been invented enough, but with the creation of such an economy when it would be profitable for our and the foreign bourgeoisie to invest money on their own territory.

I talked about practical creation, but I am for a scientific approach, so in the beginning there must inevitably be theoretical developments and calculations. And this is still very bad. The very models that "have been invented enough" - there are no firm calculations at all. All their proposals boil down to "bet on black" or "bet on red".
As for bringing in the bourgeoisie, I don't think that's a good idea. They are chasing their own profits, and they do not care about the welfare of the "natives". Usually so.

[mikh-korsakov]

Sergei! The bourgeoisie, alas, is an indisputable fact - it must be reckoned with. It’s true that they are pursuing profit, but this is precisely the art of administration to curb their appetites - the tools for this have long been known - these are taxes and duties. By the way, by raising duties on gasoline export, our authorities reduced the price increase inside. This is an example. If they continue to act in the same spirit - I am sure - it will become better

[Polymer]

Quote: mikh-korsakov

If they continue to act in the same spirit - I am sure - it will become better

I'm not sure that it will become better for a long time. This patching of holes will last forever - they will darn in one place, there will be a loophole in another.

[mikh-korsakov]

Sergei! Your avatar shows a non-linear structure. What could it be? Essentially a dispute. In the Russian context, there is no other way than taxes and duties to influence the economy. There is another powerful way to make a breakthrough in the economy - this is to attract investment by creating a free economic zone (China), or direct investment in the economy (the post-war German miracle of Erhardt). However, these paths were blocked for us. So, yes, darn and patch - because everything else is breaking. They often refer to a breakthrough through technological progress, but this is a very long process, besides, the domestic Russian market is not large, besides, the world economy has already moved to a new level - and the supply of "miracles" has been captured by the Asians. If we consider revolutionary changes, then it took about 12 years to rebuild a much less complex economy after the revolution to restore the pre-revolutionary level.

[Polymer]

And here is the image on my profile picture?
In general, this is a structural model of a polymer molecule ...

[New Year day]

Quote: Polymer

it is necessary to start not with annexation, but with the creation of a model of the economy that will "pull" the return of territories.

this is the most important and the first! Must be an attractive state model

[Runoway]

MORNING MONEY-EVENING CHAIRS

until the SP-2 is launched, there will be no connections!

[nPuBaTuP]

Stopudovo :))))

[evgenii67]

Quote: nPuBaTuP

Well done Zahar .... respect !!!
It's time to return these territories home !!!!

Well, here the man is balabol. Although his idea can be used as Tereshkova’s idea of ​​zeroing, it’s rather closer to the election.

As always, the coin has two sides "Zakhar Prilepin's party proposed to supplement the Basic Law of the country with a clause on the possibility of joining the Russian Federation of any territory following the results of referendums both on this territory itself and in the Russian Federation." if such a thing is legalized, does this party have a guarantee that, according to the same principle, which region as a result of the referendum will not want to secede from Russia? After all, if it’s so easy to enter, then ... well, you understand.

[nPuBaTuP]

You can enter, but forgive nizya .....

[businessv]

Quote: nPuBaTuP

Well done Zahar .... respect !!!

I always respected Prilepin, but questions have been piling up over the past year. I look forward to comment from the Insurgent first-hand info!

[minigor]

Look who is on the list of his team ... then you will do a great job!

[Gardamir]

Russia needs to hold a referendum

What did you like the voting ball? And that’s right, we’ll vote on SMS for a month, then at least we’ll join Alaska. Only Prilepin doesn’t care, and if Bourke-Halt-er comes again?

[Deniska999]

There is a federal constitutional law on the possibility of entering new territories. Why more amendments?

[mitroha]

I am not against joining these republics without any referendum in the Russian Federation. Quite enough results of local referenda and decisions of the Government of the Russian Federation
And Prilepin, with all due respect, will pay for this referendum from his own pocket or, even without really getting to the authorities, he will waste money on the budget. Why this populism.

[Avior]

For the truth

for example, does not plan to fight corruption? For better medicine?
Or so, self-educated hypanut on a fashionable topic?

[Anatole Klim]

Quote: Avior

for example, does not plan to fight corruption?

Here this topic is already occupied, Zakhar was late, here a new anti-corruption was drawn.
Roman Putin, an entrepreneur and cousin of the president of Russia, was elected chairman and leader of the People Against Corruption party, RIA Novosti reported on Sunday, July 5.
The decision at the party congress was announced by the chairman of the general political council Grigory Anisimov.
Inclusion in the party “A successful entrepreneur, public and political figure” will give it a “new impulse” in the implementation of anti-corruption activities and social projects, Anisimov noted. = https% 1031834A% 2020F% 07Fyandex.ru% 05Fnews

[Avior]

Yeah. Bees against honey.
I would like to look at an official who demands money from such an entrepreneur.

[AU Ivanov.]

Prilepin is one of the few who provided real assistance to Donbass. And he has every right to such statements.

[minigor]

His team, lawyers and lawyers, are all Jews!
See the lists! One Yasin, what is it! In the 90s, he warmed his hands well!

[Olegater]

Good morning, dear forum users!

I believe that this is just such a move that would draw attention to the party and declare itself. No more. In politics, guided by pragmatism - profitable or not profitable. These steps, as proposed now, are NOT FAVORABLE for the current government. There are many reasons for this. Starting with economics and ending with politics.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: Olegater

These steps, as proposed now, are NOT FAVORABLE for the current government. There are many reasons for this. Starting with economics and ending with politics.

Are referendums on the accession of new territories to Russia not beneficial for the current government?

[Olegater]

Good morning!
With respect to your indignation, it is. Not profitable. Look, what cries of snot, hysteria was in the west (on the return of the Crimea)? Sanctions and nibbled some friends offshore. Are these affiliations beneficial to this power? These woodpeckers do not want to lose what they have robbed and taken out, and the official government will get an even bigger headache! So it will not work to attach. While the money of those in power and especially the oligarchy in the west. And do not pay attention, dear members of the forum, to such provocateurs as this non-party leader. They are designed to excite the minds for the sake of "hype" and polit. points.
The return of land, if any, provided that there is no threat to money in the Western accounts of the environment nullified.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: Olegater

nibbled a lot of friends on offshore

Who exactly and how much did they pinch, could you clarify?

And if "they" are so shaking for their money, then why did they return Crimea? We would have left everything as it was, and no sanctions and money intact.

[Olegater]

Example - Deripaska? Okay, this is on the "surface", you can find material on its "pinching" yourself. And in Crimea, I can say that I missed the peninsula, then bases with US NATO missiles would appear there. And this is not entirely pleasant, you must agree. Well, the massacre of the Crimean population by the ho.kh.l.o. fascists. and this is already clearly a declaration of war by lackeys of the West, and inside the population did not understand the authorities refuse to protect the Russians. This is just a shot. The conversation can go on for a very long time. There are a lot of options !!

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: Olegater

Example - Deripaska? Okay, this is on the "surface", you can find material on its "pinching" yourself.

Are you asking me about Deripaska? That is, you yourself do not know for sure, right?
On the Internet you can find anything you want. Many will lie, they will take inexpensively, and some so generally for the idea.
I would like more substantial evidence, otherwise it turns out like the Anglo-Saxons. Either there is evidence, but we will not show it, or generally "high-likes".
You can slander, slander anyone. But is it worthy of a civilized man, man?
You can relate to Putin and his entourage in any way, but to humiliate yourself to the level of grandmothers at the entrance is the same as signing in contempt for yourself.

And in Crimea, I can say that I missed the peninsula, then there would have appeared a base with US NATO missiles.

But if our elites are already "their" elites, and they are not going to fight the United States, where they have children and money, then what difference does it make to them where the United States has naval bases and missiles?

Well, the massacre of the Crimean population by the HOFLO fascists. and this is clearly a declaration of war by the lackeys of the West, and inside the population did not understand the authorities refused to protect the Russians.

Again. If they care most about money, then why should they care about the opinion of the people?

It turns out somehow illogical. Here they are not afraid of sanctions, but here they are already afraid. "We play here, we don't play here, but here they wrap the fish."

[Olegater]

I will answer:
According to the oligarchs. I did not ask, but answered, as an example. Smart, enough hint. The authorities are smart and cynical. They understood the hint.
Everything that is written in the media and on the Internet needs to be filtered. Separate truth from lies based on your life experience.
Maybe I did not understand the question?
Slander against the oligarchy? Do you really think so?
When their activities are in sight. Evidence is and is covered by all media. By anyone. Yes and more. Deripaska is an example of what will happen if zeroed will act on the likeness of the Crimea.

For US NATO bases and the elite:
A big difference, they understand it and very clearly. Just imagine. An enemy base appeared in the Crimea. Clashes of Russians and rabble from Ukraine began. And clashes are inevitable. Perhaps it will go to these bases, like sabotage.
Will the thinking and caring population of Russia look so calmly at what is going on there? Dissatisfaction with the protests will begin, and as a sign of the silence of the authorities and the oligarchy, lawlessness will become sabotage everywhere, and the elites need the population working for their welfare to allow them to be thrown so?
You know no worse than me that profit is made by the hands of working people in production ..
And if this war goes to Russia? Then to all sources of income kirdyk.
And it’s not the opinion of the people that interests the elite, but the fact that stable pumping will cease due to war. (This scenario is hypothetical! Do not forget).
I hope that my arguments are reasonable and simple.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: Olegater

Clever, just a hint. The authorities are smart and cynical. They understood the hint.

Not understood. A hint of what?

[Olegater]

Hint that it’s not permissible to go beyond certain lines. If the likeness of Crimea will continue, then the elite will be punished, like Deripaska. The lines drawn by the West (summarize) on many issues. So I hope it’s more understandable?
Sincerely.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

That is, the "soft" sanctions for Crimea are, in a way, a handout to the working class, so that, inspired by this good news, he can start working twice as well. Thus, the "elite" offset the loss due to the sanctions with the profit associated with the increased productivity.
Did I understand you correctly?

[Olegater]

These "sanctions" are primarily aimed at the elite, the entourage in power. Nowadays, the economy decides a lot. And the economy is ruled by the oligarchs, the oligarchs make it clear to them where their willfulness ends. Nobody remembers the workers now.
And if it is necessary, then they will "give" a handout, do not seem a little and we will work twice, or even three times better, more inspired!

And your sarcasm is normal, appreciated.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

I do not agree with your assessment, but thank you for the polite and calm dialogue.
All the best!

[Olegater]

How many people, so many opinions.
And thank you for the dialogue. I hope in this regard and we will discuss all topics. All the best!

[Sergey Averchenkov]

Probably unprofitable. But you won’t lie against the people. Not so simple.

[populist]

Quote: Olegater

Olegater (Olegater)
I believe that this is just such a move that would draw attention to the party and declare itself. No more.

Absolutely.
This move is designed for a patriotic, but little-informed audience. However, the whole "party" of Prilepin is also designed for this audience. The “party” itself is fake and created to select votes from the left.
Already there are several such fake remodels created by the authorities for future elections to the State Duma. And Prilepin has long been conducted from the Kremlin. At VO there was a discussion of this next dummy.

[Olegater]

Dear forum member PEOPLE!
Thank you for the addition, concise, capacious, accurate.

[populist]

Always happy if my thoughts and knowledge come in handy.
Let me give you a little from the old discussion. So that respected members of the forum have a true idea of ​​this Prilepin simulacrum.

The party’s advisers included several very competent and well-known Kremlin propagandists — Sergei Mikheev, Semyon Bogdasarov, Dmitry Kulikov, and others.

[silverwolf88]

The sentence is just a dumb hype ... and it looks very much like a provocation ... especially since the words are worthless ...

[Sergey Averchenkov]

Monkey, what is hype?

[The popuas]

I am not a "monkey", but I will answer you, HYIP is a repetition of something popular ...!

[Sergey Averchenkov]

You are hovering around the capitals ... Sorry for the monkey - it broke.

[The popuas]

Fortunately, I have little in common with the capital and have never been there

[Sergey Averchenkov]

Sorry one more time. It happens.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

In the modern sense, "hype" is an unhealthy excitement, often artificially created.

[Qwertyarion]

. replenish the country's Basic Law with a clause on the possibility of accession to the Russian Federation of any territory following the results of referenda both in this territory and in the Russian Federation.

That is, if, for example, Mongolia passes a similar law and holds a referendum on Russia's accession to Mongolia, then will we all become residents of Mongolia?
How simple it all turns out ....

[zwlad]

Can give them the opportunity to hold their referendum first?

[Plastmaster]

It will be like in a cartoon about a grandmother. And the US is against.

[zwlad]

And them (USA), if that, someone will ask?

[Sergey Averchenkov]

I am for. What else can I say.

[rocket757]

The new party of the Russian Federation proposes a referendum on the accession of LDNR, Abkhazia and other republics to Russia

This goal is understandable. COMPLETE DEFECTS, former guides.
Only we still have a LOT of other imperfections, how to deal with them?
This is a good reserve, a reason, to get support from people who don’t like it all.
In general, you have to really look.

[Plastmaster]

It is necessary to call a spade a spade. Not the accession, but the return of the old territories that were part of the founding territory. But if with the same England, then it’s an accession.

[AU Ivanov.]

Make Britain a colony of Russia? And what, in London, as Vysotsky sang: "a quarter of our people."

[DeKo]

New Russia yes. Abkhazia is not. Republic mired in corruption and inaction

[Boris55]

The basis is this: if 75% of the citizens of a particular territory in a referendum advocate joining Russia,

That is, they seem to want, and we kind of want? Isn't there too many "like"?
If someone forgot, then the Donbass in a referendum voted for separation from everyone, for independence of the military leader and from Russia. There was no vote on joining Russia.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Boris55

If someone forgot, then the Donbass in a referendum voted to secede from all and from Russia.

You distort again. Independence was precisely for separation from Ukraine. After that, the leadership of LDNR asked to consider the issue of joining the Russian Federation.

[Boris55]

Quote: Mordvin 3

After that, the leadership of LDNR asked to consider the issue of joining the Russian Federation.

The desire of leadership is understandable - it wants to continue to lead, even under the devil, but with a whip ... but what do people think, you know? No, and I don’t know. In order to find out the opinion of the people, you need his vote, which is still not there and this leads to thoughts ...

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Boris55

In order to know the opinion of the people-you need his vote, which is still not there and this suggests ...

Wow.

"We, the people of the Donetsk People's Republic, according to the results of the referendum held by 11 on May 2014 of the year, and based on the declaration of sovereignty of the DPR, declare that henceforth Donetsk People's Republic is a sovereign state," said Denis Pushilin at a press conference today. .

“We ask to consider the issue of the entry of the Donetsk People’s Republic into the Russian Federation,” he added.

[Boris55]

Quote: Mordvin 3

Wow.

That is, Pushilin is broadcasting from the estate of a people whose opinion did not bother to find out?

When Putin told them in the 14th not to hold a referendum, did they listen to him? No, so why should we listen to them now?

The industrial east of Ukraine in terms of population has always surpassed the farm western part. As a whole, Ukraine would never become pro-Western. Any vote has always been for the east of Ukraine.

Using the mood of the people, the Western intelligence services separated the rebellious region and were able to advance their interests in Ukraine. Before that, they tried for many years, it didn’t work ... Holistic Ukraine has always been drawn to Russia.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Boris55

That is, Pushilin is broadcasting from the estate of a people whose opinion did not bother to find out?

This is a 14 year old. We all perfectly remember the mood of Donbass. In 2017, Zakharchenko announced the creation of Little Russia. According to the same Prilepin, the one watching from Moscow immediately came running and demanded to disavow everything.

[Boris55]

Quote: Mordvin 3

We all perfectly remember the mood of Donbass.

Yes, we remember the lines of voting in one and a half open areas to create a picture ...

Calls to drag Russia into any kind of war are a call to weaken Russia. This is beneficial only to the enemies of Russia.

Are you ready to die for the people of Donbass, who do not know whether or not they want such happiness? Are you ready to halve your family budget for the sake of restoring Donbass and Ukraine as a whole?

I’m silent about how many fresh graves will appear in our cemeteries with young guys who died for Prilepin’s ravings ...

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Boris55

Are you ready to halve your family budget for the sake of restoring Donbass and Ukraine as a whole?

How interesting. Personally, I like the people of Donbass much more than the people of one republic, to which Allah serves.

[Boris55]

Quote: mordvin xnumx

Personally, I like the people of Donbass much more

Like do not like it - this concept is subjective to politics has no relation whatsoever.

Quote: Mordvin 3

Personally, I like the people of Donbass much more than the people of one republic, to which Allah serves.

The incitement of inter-religious strife is not permissible. The difference between the right-glorious and the right-loyal is that some praise the right, while others are true to it.

[Mordvin 3]

Quote: Boris55

The incitement of inter-religious strife is not permissible.

I agree. All people are brothers. Peace, labor, chewing gum!

[Plastmaster]

Like yes. But how many people have already moved to Russia. Take their opinion into account?

[Stas34]

Before you obsserat Zakhar and his party, read what they are striving for. Most filthy Zahara, in their lives, did not tie their shoelaces on their own. Read his books, maybe then it will become easier! Populism in Volodya, in Zakhar's case.

[Igor Pa]

Che and then it seems to me that if this happened, then after all the sanctions and other things, the Russians would say no.

[Guards turn]

"Here we are, when we talk about Crimea, Kamchatka, Sakhalin, Kuriles ... Yes, Russia will only grow in its territories, returning what was bequeathed to us by our ancestors. And the Constitution directly states this - it will grow," said Alexey Kondratyev, a member of Federation Council Committee on International Affairs.

[Baloo]

Residents of these territories themselves must decide their fate, and not political adventurers. For me, the more mundane things are more important than the problems of Prilepin and his party: decent pensions, access to education, not money, decent wages for everyone, not just Chubais and Grefs, and finally, the forest, when we begin to restore forests everywhere, at least manually where the ravines are, landfills, etc.

[Maks1995]

Useless then. The authorities created the buffer territories for good reason.
No one will change. How then to go with children to USA?

[mag nit]

Sounds like a toast - "Well, for the truth!".

[yfast]

First you need to join the United States. Then, when the main enemy of our capitalists disappears, we can think about joining the rest.

[Fierce73]

Work is already underway! We will join in parts, so for now, our black agents must destroy it to the ground! And then ... Well, you understand

[yfast]

Be careful with your work, otherwise the Washington newspaper will post tomorrow with headlines about managing the movement "only black lives matter, the rest don't care" from our country.

[Jurkovs]

If you require the inclusion of all five republics, then this is a failed PR campaign. But if, first, the question of LDNR is raised, then it is completely solvable.

[Captivity]

Pure populism. Elections on the nose.

[bad]

Expected. Someone would have raised this topic anyway.

[Siberian]

The question needs to be raised from below, everything Prilepin does right - the people want! People's initiative. A drop is sharpening a stone. And slowly, little by little ... Zaporozhye, Kharkov will already border the Russian Federation. will have a safety net. And so on. Better 40 times once than never 40 times

[Fierce73]

The author, whether he wants it or not, has posted a rather provocative article! And here's why: the program of the party "For Truth" is a rather large document, but the most hype topics were taken out of context and placed in this article! A half-truth is a lie! If there is a desire, then the link can be used to get acquainted with the official theses of the party: https://zapravdu.org/2020/07/06/predvybornaya-programma-politicheskoj-partii-za-pravdu/?fbclid=IwAR1PgAwJAMqcQDfL9wth7LHbYdkuXOWM.
And the respected people of this site rushed, without checking, without specifying, without deepening their knowledge, to blame! Read, think and write! I think that CONSTRUCTIVE criticism (and suggestions) has not disturbed anyone yet!

[businessv]

Quote: Fierce73

I think that CONSTRUCTIVE criticism (and suggestions) has not disturbed anyone yet!

You are certainly right, but first you need to find out whose project this is, in fact, created a year before the election? Such facts of the creation of parties are always alarming, having previously untwisted its founder on television. Prilepin always respected, but nevertheless, today there are a lot of questions to him. I look forward to comment and opinion of the Insurgent!

[Escobar]

Handsome men. Until 2017, Russia alone paid debts to the Paris club, and these people were on the sidelines. I'm not me and not my hut. Now that their independence economies have collapsed over the years of independence, they have been asked back to have grandmas swell in them. What is the only use of them is that their territories will allow the NATO troops to be moved away from the borders.

[alone]

Quote: Mavrikiy

In the names of the parties, the word "truth" was not used for us. I give an even more significant word, "conscience".
Have a feeder.

It remains to create a party of loafers and gorlopanov and all ..

[Whirlwind]

The Americans only need this, so that they could bog down and come to the whole bird of the khan ...

[Yarik]

but I would definitely not want to see Abkhazians as part of the Russian Federation. A good example of their attitude towards our tourists and arrogant. greyhound stay in our country. Let them determine their own being, without our participation.

[Comrade Michael]

The authorities will not do anything like that. They will not allow anyone to take any serious decisions. And your party, they organized it for the jackdaw .... The Russians love only Putin and United Russia (well, or any party that the authorities will offer) ... But I personally do not need anything except my village. Fight for the rest yourself.

[Anatoly Tuponoga]

Mikhail you sniffed gunpowder and you will protect the village

[Comrade Michael]

Nobody has ever attacked or attacks me. Neither in the 90s, nor now .... I calmly walked on my land when the frightened townsfolk were sitting under the bed .... No need to kindle psychosis among citizens. And I will not defend the village, I have no friends outside the inner circle. I protect my home and family. You didn’t finish playing soldiers?

[Alexander X]

Assuming that "this is not without reason" ©, we can conclude that this is a trial balloon for the unification of Russian lands ... And it must be borne in mind that in the Prilepin party, in my opinion, certain guidelines are given as to what to declare and what to fight for, because the old-living parties are already irritating the inhabitants ... IMHO ...

[doubovitski]

Quote: Alexander X

Assuming that "this is not without reason" ©, we can conclude that this is a trial balloon for the unification of Russian lands ... And it must be borne in mind that in the Prilepin party, in my opinion, certain guidelines are given as to what to declare and what to fight for, because the old-living parties are already irritating the inhabitants ... IMHO ...

The actions of these mongrels give trump cards to our enemies. The situation is relatively calm there now and, of course, the war in the event of our movement there.

[Nitarius]

ohh damn)) I understand the movement went)))

[businessv]

According to the proposal contained in the election program of the party "For Truth", in Russia it is necessary to hold a referendum on the inclusion of the above-mentioned republics in Russia.

To begin with, it would be necessary to hold a referendum on the creation of a financial base to "ensure the conduct of Russia's foreign policy, for which we propose: dispossess the oligarchs, nationalize budget-forming enterprises, all mining and oil refining complexes, military-industrial complex enterprises and other illegally privatized enterprises with the clarification of the reasons and the punishment of all those involved. to this action of the members! "

[Anatoly Tuponoga]

it’s time to join the named republics there is a desire of the whole people

[senima56]

The West will always bark! Regardless of whether we attach or not. Let then already "bark" because of the fact that they added! Give a referendum in the LPR, South Ossetia (RSO), Abkhazia and the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic (PMR)! Give me a connection!

[7,62x54]

Then immediately list California and Alaska.

[Old26]

Quote: orionvitt

This is primarily the return of illegally seized territories in 1991.

And which territories were illegally torn away from Russia in 1991. the same populism as the statements of Prilepin

Quote: orionvitt

First you need to deal with the political regimes in Ukraine, Georgia and other, strongly "greyhound" type of states. To make Russia's position stronger in relation to Europe and the United States.

A showdown with political regimes will not lead to anything good. But to make Russia economically more developed (powerful) so that its neighbors "want" to be with it in the Union is another matter. And if your economy is not among the first at least 20 economies in the world, no one will really reckon with you

Quote: Runoway

until the SP-2 is launched, there will be no connections!

And then in the coming decades too. One must still not look through the pink glasses at the whole world

"Zakhar Prilepin's party proposed to supplement the Basic Law of the country with a clause on the possibility of joining the Russian Federation of any territory following the results of referendums both on this territory itself and in the Russian Federation."

What about the referendum in the country that previously owned these territories?

Quote: AU Ivanov.

Prilepin is one of the few who provided real assistance to Donbass. And he has every right to such statements.

No one denies his help to Donbass. But making such populist statements is a game for the public, and not on her minds, but on her emotions

Quote: orionvitt

Ukraine will not sail anywhere. NATO has its own problems above the roof, except to balance a poor country with an army armed with Soviet weapons 30-40 years ago. And even that, for the most part, is either sold or in poor condition. Georgia did not leave, although there was talk of figs. They do not need NATO, they are needed only as food for the political ambitions of the West.

Georgia did not leave NATO due to territorial disputes (South Ossetia, Abkhazia). Need to accept Ukraine into NATO-will. By its power, the Ukrainian army surpasses any of the three (but rather all together) Baltic countries. But nothing. They were admitted to NATO, despite the fact that they do not have an aircraft, nor a fleet, and the armed forces are a parody in terms of quantity and quality.

Quote: Stas34

Populism in Volodya, in Zakhar's case.

Both have enough populism. GDP - even though in power and should "filter the bazaar", and Prilepin - "Emelya's shallow - your week"

Quote: Siberian

The question needs to be raised from below, everything Prilepin does right - the people want! People's initiative. A drop is sharpening a stone. And slowly, little by little ... Zaporozhye, Kharkov will already border the Russian Federation. will have a safety net. And so on. Better 40 times once than never 40 times

The popular initiative is good before the election. The rest of the time they spit on her. Moreover, in unitary Ukraine there are not even close provisions in the Constitution on the exit of its individual areas. They (regions) do not possess autonomy.
And Kharkov has been bordering Russia for 3 decades already (after the collapse of the Union). . Zaporozhye and close to the borders of Russia is not worth it. So the hedge is exclusively in your thoughts. If at least a humcon convoy can be sent to the Kharkiv region, if anything - to Zaporizhzhya - ... refresh your knowledge of geography

Quote: Fierce73

The author, whether he wants it or not, has posted a rather provocative article! And here's why: the program of the party "For Truth" is a rather large document, but the most hype topics were taken out of context and placed in this article! A half-truth is a lie! If there is a desire, then the link can be used to get acquainted with the official theses of the party: https://zapravdu.org/2020/07/06/predvybornaya-programma-politicheskoj-partii-za-pravdu/?fbclid=IwAR1PgAwJAMqcQDfL9wth7LHbYdkuXOWM.
And the respected people of this site rushed, without checking, without specifying, without deepening their knowledge, to blame! Read, think and write! I think that CONSTRUCTIVE criticism (and suggestions) has not disturbed anyone yet!

You have in vain posted a link to the party program. After reading it, you understand that what was in the article is a trifle compared to the populism in the program. The wildest mixture, designed to influence not even the minds, but emotions. Reading it - this is how you see the books of Maxim Kalashnikov (in style)

3. Recognition of the actual expansion of the territory of Russian civilization. We stand for the immediate recognition of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR), Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR), the Transnistrian Moldavian Republic (PMR) and, according to the results of referenda, their inclusion in Russia. We stand for the immediate, according to the results of referenda, accession to the Russian Federation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia on the rights of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. We are in favor of building a full-fledged Union State of Russia and Belarus with the formation of common authorities, a common budget and the establishment of the ruble as a single currency.

That is, chop off part of the territory from other states, and immediately.

4. The formation of the belt of friendly states.

Having completed the previous paragraph, we will receive a belt of states that will immediately become NATO members, and instead of a friendly belt, we will receive a belt of hostilities ... Yes, NATO should say thanks to Prilepin for such a gift ...

III. EMPIRE
15 One of the priorities should be a security regime along the perimeter of the borders of Russia. Along the perimeter of our borders should be either friendly and allied states that recognize Russia's special civilizational role in the world, or neutral. To ensure the security of our and our allies, we abandon the principle of non-interference in the affairs of other states.

That is, the aggressiveness of our country is declared in advance. And after that Prilepin and his party are hoping for a "belt of friendly states?"

If the rights of our compatriots are violated in another country, the response from Russia should not be mirror but asymmetric, up to economic sanctions and deportation of Russian citizens from Russia

Uh-huh. Here in the Baltics the rights of our citizens are being infringed. What economic sanctions can we apply against them? Is there a significant trade turnover so that we can "hit with the ruble"? And deporting the Balts is generally enchanting. as if they were coming to us to get a job ...

We propose introducing a “Children's Million”: a deposit account must be opened for each newborn in a state bank or state investment fund with the possibility of using these funds after 18 years for education, purchase of housing, and other purposes agreed with the relevant state bodies.

Another populist option The income to the Russian budget of EMNIP in 2019 was just over 20 trillion rubles. The number of births is 1,25 million children. That is, the "children's million" is 1,25 trillion rubles out of 20 trillion in income. But there they also talk about increasing the income of scientists, doctors, teachers, cultural workers, etc. etc. Ah, I forgot the pensioners ...

The costs of state cultural policy should be increased significantly. In terms of people, Russia spends per year on culture — about 4000 rubles. And you need to spend 10-15 times more — more than 50 thousand rubles per person

Another 7 trillion ...

Cultural centers in each region of the country should become the key agent for promoting culture, which should create a vast cultural space and ensure the creation of various cultural products and values.

But aren't they? In each regional and regional center there are such structures. They are called differently, but there are. But he doesn’t seem to know this. Plus there are separate cultural heritage structures. In the Stavropol Territory, this is, for example, Cossacks-Nekrasovites ...

[lot]

First I attached brains to the head. New party.

[Frol Agripa]

Prilepin-cleaved to the feeder, and begins to carry garbage for his PR! Mediocrity and opportunist!

[Vladimir Nizhegorodsky]

Zakhar Prilepin good luck and success !!!
And so that the party really was "FOR THE TRUTH !!!"
You look and people wake up.

[doubovitski]

Comrade Prilepin went into business; he was clearly not up to the task. To write stories with stories about Natsik’s atrocities and the adventures of agents on enemy territory, and the organization of a political party .... Throw ideas that are not possible to implement at present, moreover, with dubious benefits if successful, and certainly, getting a slap in the face case NOT success. To hand over to the enemies of Russia trump cards in accusing the annexations of territories. A weak argument in a dispute arms an opponent. It is necessary not to mince, in a hurry to collect such a LOT, but to wait, choosing the moment, and, possibly, the ONLY killing one on the spot. As happened with the Crimea. This is a solid action, justified, and gave tremendous benefits. What will Transnistria give us? We won’t get the advantages of the Kaliningrad region. But the trouble of an enclave with an isolated territory is comprehensive.

[Incvizitor]

First, you need to get all the "Ukrainians" out of there, and Russians are always welcome.

[Comrade Michael]

Kindergarten .... And in the comments and this party ...