US official urges Russia to abandon the "terrible" weapons "Petrel" and "Poseidon"

From the United States, I heard more calls to Russia on the issue of the latest armory developments. At the same time, calls, as is usually the case with American rhetoric, are more reminiscent of demands.

The US President’s Special Envoy for Arms Control said the Russian Petrel and Poseidon projects are “terrible.”

M. Billingsley:

Russia should at least postpone the implementation of Skyfall (the American designation for "Petrel") and Poseidon, abandoning it now. This is a waste of money for Russia, since the new agreement, which will replace START III, will still ban these weapons.

A statement by an American official followed after Sweden announced an increase in radiation background. Exceeded the level of cesium-134 and 137, as well as ruthenium 103. The Swedish media said that the increase in radiation levels may be due to radiation emissions in Russia. The “ejection” itself was associated with “a possible test by Russia of the latest weapons.”

M. Billingsley said that he could not say exactly what the responsibility of Russia is in increasing the background radiation, but if tests were carried out, then "Russia is going the wrong way."

Recall that the “Petrel” is a promising Russian cruise missile of virtually unlimited range. This range is provided by the presence of a nuclear power plant. Earlier in the US, it was stated that Russia does not have the latest weapons, and everything shown during President Putin’s message is “nothing more than an animation”.

Comments

[Pereira]

The scarecrow the Wise would say this:
- If I had brains, I would first ask the neighbors - Norway, Finland and Denmark. If everything is fine with them (and they don’t hear any allegations of abnormality), then you should look for the cause at home.

[Shurik70]

At first they buried the previous agreement, they say that there will be no new one, and now they suddenly rely on the future in arguments.

[KAV]

a new agreement to replace START III will still ban these weapons

What a blithe self-confidence! Shish without oil to you, not fulfilling your requirements!

[Reptiloid]

above the gray plain of the sea the wind collects clouds. Between the clouds and the sea the Petrel proudly roars, like a black lightning ............ May the storm strike more strongly!

[CBR600]

thanks, to the point! the petrel of black lightning proudly flies like. Well here we read about him, THING !!

[Reptiloid]

Quote: CBR600

thanks, to the point! the petrel of black lightning proudly flies like. Well here we read about him, THING !!

And I myself have repeatedly addressed the topic Petrel !!!!!!!!!
For example:

But the petrel will fly in the darkness
To return the world to the Soviet canons!
Its claws --- like a harpy’s,
And the wings --- like a dragon!
2020, March.

[tikhonov66]

we were born to make the cartoon come true ...

[tikhonov66]

and believe us - for every ultimatum
Soyuzmulfilm will be able to give an ANSWER

[tikhonov66]

Farther and deeper and higher
We strive for the flight of our birds
And in every "cartoon" breathes
Tranquility of our borders!

[Odessa Greek]

How puffed up, how you try to burp the muck ...... Pay well? What do you take in green or paper hryvnias?)))) Although it is possible for cookies, it’s difficult for the Europeans to have hryvnias - everyone is waiting for a loan from the IMF)))

[Reptiloid]

Quote: tikhonov66

and believe us - for every ultimatum
Soyuzmulfilm will be able to give an ANSWER

that would be great! Than our children to score a head with foreign heroes! Awesome by some

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Shurik70

. This is a waste of money for Russia, since the new agreement that will replace START III will still ban these weapons.

Listen to them and marvel

This is a waste of money for Russia,

And where does such a concern for our costs come from?

since the new agreement, which will replace START III, will still ban these weapons.

And you asked us, will we generally sign any agreements with you?
And you asked us what we will ban, and what not?
Again this is meager rudeness

[1976AG]

Well, if the Americans completely destroy their nuclear weapons and missile defense systems, then I think you can consider this issue)

[NIKN]

Nope. Now this is not real, the owners of these devices are becoming more and more. China does not intend to open the topic regarding reductions.

[Incvizitor]

Not only ours but also its regimes, from Europe, the occupied part of Korea, Israel ...

[cradle]

it’s not worth it ... there are too many of them ... and a sound weapon equalizes the chances.

[astepanov]

Moreover, this is called a “terrible weapon” by the country that first created atomic weapons, the only one that has applied it in practice (and unnecessarily also for the civilian population), noted the largest use of chemical weapons in history, which has the largest defense budget in the world and the largest arsenals. Amazing Pharisaism.

[cradle]

it is terribly patamusha threatening the chosen ones ...

[smart ass]

The petrel, of course, is a stupid and dangerous invention, moreover, dangerous for the carrier, but Poseidon is a good thing, just for amers it was invented

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Pereira

I would first ask the neighbors

And then I thought.
If

and everything shown during the message of President Putin - "Nothing more than animation".

Then where did the radiation background come from?

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Lipchanin

Then where did the radiation background come from?

If only Rosatom bought Soyuzmultfilm, and delivers him the CPM.

[Letun]

Quote: Lipchanin

If
and everything shown during President Putin’s message is “nothing more than animation.”

Then where did the radiation background come from?

So the background is from there, for drawing cartoons and launching real RCs with a nuclear engine is not the same thing ...

[Simargl]

Quote: Lipchanin

Then where did the radiation background come from?

7-D projector, with a unit-pumped lamp

[Polite Moose]

Quote: Pereira

Scarecrow the wise would say so

Unfortunately, we are not dealing with the Wise Scarecrow, but with the Terrible M-loy.

[figwam]

Quote: Pereira

for starters, I would ask the neighbors - Norway, Finland and Denmark.

The Swedes, as always, pretend that neutrality, but always help our opponents.

[Metallurg_2]

But the problem is that instead of the brains of the indicated persons, shit is in the head.

[Tank hard]

From the USA, regular calls were heard to Russia on the latest weapons developments. Moreover, appeals, as is usually the case with American rhetoric, are more reminiscent of demands.

Kneel in front of boots, but demand! This is what power of habit means.

[nemez]

They demand to put other shoes in front of them.

[cradle]

it’s they who train before giving up the Russians ... A useful skill will be for this homosyat shobla

[tralflot1832]

We would gladly abandon the Petrels, start it up so they don’t want to sit down. We can hardly restrain: Objectives require you to specify! Try to plant an American wise guy!

[vlad kave]

It should be like this: "Vasya listens, but eats."

[Retvizan 8]

... "The US official called on Russia to abandon the" terrible "weapons" ...
Uncle do not get distracted, it is better to solve issues of racial discrimination and the rights of perverts, oh sorry, sexual minorities!

[NEXUS]

Quote: Retvizan 8

better address issues of racial discrimination and the rights of perverts, oh sorry, sexual minorities!

And they decide ... the stupidity of the nation already has a place to be, plus problems with obesity, the psyche, and so on ... foods with GMOs are all around there, respectively, you don’t have to talk about the health of the nation at all.
As for foreign policy, the Anglo-Saxons have always been enemies of Slavic civilization.
What is most regrettable is that instead of uniting the Slavs and living together as the Anglo-Saxons do, most of the Slavic countries fell under them.

[marchcat]

This is a waste of money for Russia, since the new agreement that will replace START III will still ban these weapons

And that START-3 has already been signed? So, do not indicate how and what we should do ... if the minds themselves do not have enough for such products!

[vavilon]

Well, no one has signed the agreement yet and it is not known whether they will sign it, but the Western partner needs to learn to perceive reality, and not to live in their illusions and demand from others what they themselves do not

[NDR-791]

This is a waste of money for Russia, since the new agreement, which will replace START III, will still ban these weapons.
How well they live in their rainbow dream ... Especially at the expense of "still forbid." Dream, cranks, but sometimes remember that there is nothing worse than a dream come true.

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

This is the whole logic of the so-called Western civilization.
I remember, whether in 2015 or in 2016, Steinmeier once said that let Russia return Crimea to Ukraine first, and only after that they will think - only think - about lifting the sanctions.
Same thing now. First, let Russia destroy its weapons, and then they will figure out whether it is worth concluding a new treaty, and in what form.

[keeper03]

First, let the United States remove its bases around the world, destroy their chemical weapons, nuclear weapons, then we will consider this issue, but for now it's time for us to put ultimatums!

[rocket757]

The US President’s Special Envoy for Arms Control said the Russian Petrel and Poseidon projects are “terrible.”

To send far, the first time, I wouldn’t have to send further.

[cradle]

We will send the cartridge to the chamber when we meet with these tricks. After sending the Petrels there: "... but to see ...".

[mark1]

As soon as troops with all nuclear weapons and missile defense areas are removed from Europe, they can immediately begin to demand.

[NEXUS]

Russia should at least postpone the implementation of Skyfall (the American designation for "Petrel") and Poseidon, abandoning it now. This is a waste of money for Russia, since the new agreement, which will replace START III, will still ban these weapons.

Counter REQUIREMENT-Renounce hegemony, roll up 800 bases around the world, dissolve NATO, and then we'll talk.

[Your honor]

Right! Then only you can start talking to them

[NEXUS]

Quote: Your Honor

Right! Then only you can start talking to them

No ... you don’t need to talk to them at all, since the Anglo-Saxons have been our foremost enemies for centuries. I'm not talking about ordinary people, but about elites and ruling circles. On the other hand, do not talk, nothing good can be expected.

[cradle]

and if the enemy does not surrender, they destroy him ...

[Lipchanin]

Quote: NEXUS

and then we'll talk.

Well no. we let's thinktalking with wai or not

[Simargl]

Quote: NEXUS

roll up 800 bases around the world

Unemployment will jump unprecedentedly. They can not.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

Such a statement can only be made by a foolish person, by nature.

[Egoza]

Oh! Russia spends money "wrong way"! You tell your wife when she goes shopping. And so - "Wherever I want, I’m spending it there." Well, let the United States give up all the "terrible weapons", and we will follow you ... maybe.

[tikhonov66]

Oh! Russia spends money "wrong way"!

- Only the FSA can spend the money "correctly" ...
- only EUROPE losses from FSA sanctions for the Nord Stream
will lead to a blockage of € 700 million in direct investment in the completion of the SP-2 project. In addition, € 12 billion of investments from European companies for the EU’s energy infrastructure will be in jeopardy. Of this amount, 8 billion euros are intended for Nord Stream-2.

[Gato]

we are following you ... maybe

We also promise not to build aircraft carriers anymore.

[seregatara1969]

Already called or only calls?

[Aleksandre]

Perhaps there is every chance to become a joke of the year.

[pv1005]

Amers need to learn Russian sayings more often. For example, what is written with a pen cannot be cut down with an ax. What the translation looks like, painted (cartoon) x .. erase.

[Charik]

these are jokers-hahaha hehehee-these are jokers-tear stomach

[CBR600]

Yes, what they just do not require !! But it sounds real, like a joke. Rzhu Nimagu offset
Like in that game- More !!
It’s interesting what will happen to the amers when it comes to service - “Baba Yaga” or “Petrusha” there? I would add gorynycha, but it is a mine clearance system.
.... Petrel, yeah, like black lightning. Refuse, yeah .. Return Alaska!

[thinker]

M. Billingsley ...

And his name is Marshall! I would say - not a hawk, but a political alligator.

22.05.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX Marshall Billingsley delivered a keynote speech at the Hudson Institute in Washington ... He put forward an address to Russia three charges - in violation of “almost all” agreements in the field of arms control, lowering the threshold of applicability of nuclear weapons and the development of “mobile Chernobyls”. Mr. Billingsley presented to Moscow two requirements: Set China at the negotiating table and destroy tactical nuclear weapons. And warned: US arms race will ruin Russia.

[tralflot1832]

The wipers in Formula 1 are also Marshals. I wanted to be built in Formula 1 for writing in the work book: Marshal, does it sound? And so is the janitor. Let the Ahschwalt sweep the language.

[CBR600]

Requirements to interpret as a sentence, they say, we want it. The opposite side is responsible, and we say this ... That’s where the Dialogues and the solution of all issues begin =)), you know the politician.

[mag nit]

Are the cartoons scared?

[cradle]

they haven’t seen a cartoon about Leopold’s cat

[rusich]

The US official urged Russia to abandon the "terrible" weapons "Petrel" and "Poseidon", and then in the dance was a shortage of toilet paper and diapers

[rotkiv04]

Russia owes nothing to anyone, and especially to Pindostan

[K-50]

US official urges Russia to abandon the "terrible" weapons "Petrel" and "Poseidon"

Why would we refuse him? Ali is there any benefit to us?
It’s a “scarecrow” for you, so that you don’t lose your “shore”, otherwise your head will sometimes throw your head out of your “exclusivity”, because here there will be at least brakes.

[rotmistr60]

called on Russia to abandon the "terrible" weapons "Petrel" and "Poseidon"

And why was he so modest by naming only two species? To walk, to walk like that - to abandon Russia in general from nuclear weapons and the latest types of weapons, to dismantle everything under American supervision (for zealous sarcasm), scrap metal armored vehicles, small arms under the press, kiss a black American boot and live happily, as the liberals have long dreamed.

[hohkn]

Quote: rotmistr60

kiss a black american boot and heal happily

What are you so ... intolerant of? You need to kiss not the boot, but "slightly" higher.

[Cetron]

In the dashing 90s it was, drank everything that is possible and impossible. And already kissed below the waist so that the echo is still standing!

[Alexander X]

Refuse weapons that cannot be intercepted, but NATO bases with nuclear weapons around the country will be rewarded and sanctions on everything will only be worse and shit ... Ay, wise guys!

[Vadim Golubkov]

In how ordinary Russian cartoons scared the Yankees.

[Wolf]

M. Billingsley could declare that Russia should immediately lay down its arms in front of the enemy, why it would be chosen.
Papausi in the USA are already going crazy, they think that in Russia the traitor Gorbachev is in the head of the state or Yeltsin is drunk, or agent Kozirev might be a ZIONIST. Gone are the days of the papaus.

[Servisinzhener]

If such statements sound, then this technique really poses a real danger to the United States. And you can’t refuse it.
And indeed stop signing all kinds of treaties for "world peace." And his "civilized" look in the eyes of the world community. As a result of compliance with which we are left without weapons capable of effectively resisting the United States.

[tikhonov66]

If such statements sound, then this technique really poses a real danger to the United States. And you can’t refuse it.

- so no one is going to ...
8-)

[Lesorub]

Earlier in the US, it was stated that Russia does not have the latest weapons, and everything shown during President Putin’s message is “nothing more than an animation”.

I don’t understand - why did the Western partners get so angry - if they don’t believe in our weapons)).

The US President’s Special Envoy for Arms Control said the Russian Petrel and Poseidon projects are “terrible.”

[aszzz888]

The US President’s Special Envoy for Arms Control said the Russian Petrel and Poseidon projects are “terrible.”

Why so? Not democratic or what?

[iouris]

'From me' accidents, the mandatory certification procedure will give a negative result - it will be banned.

[g1v2]

It seems that Americans, unlike our liberoids, still believe in "cartoons." And they began to experience something. Probably the "experts" from the site just have not yet told them that there are no cartoons, but all this is cuts, projections, etc.

[5-9]

Ogh, shchazz ... can missile defense be included in START-4?

[kartalovkolya]

To begin with, gentlemen, “gigemons” (from the word hyena) withdraw all your bases from foreign territories, stop all your aggressive wars, and only then we will watch !!!

[tikhonov66]

- if from the word "hyena" - then "hyenamon"
80 )

[APASUS]

in the USA they stated that Russia does not have any new weapons, and everything shown during the message of President Putin is “nothing more than an animation”.

How are some US statements not consistent with others?

The US President’s Special Envoy for Arms Control said the Russian Petrel and Poseidon projects are “terrible.”
M. Billingsley:
Russia should at least postpone the implementation of Skyfall (the American designation for "Petrel") and Poseidon, abandoning it now. This is a waste of money for Russia, since the new agreement, which will replace START III, will still ban these weapons.

It would be necessary to decide on the ultimate goal, what do they want, otherwise it turns out they require just in case?

[Last centurion]

probably the question can be considered ... in the event of the elimination of all US bases outside the US borders .. and the withdrawal of US troops from all countries, as well as the abolition of NATO :). and so well scary from Poseidon and the petrel etozh good- scary good :)

[tikhonov66]

Skyfall ... and Poseidon, abandoning it now.

- how, refuse cartoons ?!
Yes, NEVER!

- Long live the products of the animated cartoon -
homeland of the most HUMANOUS and FUNNY "animations".

But IF KEEP - then "our fairy tale" will become "your past" ...
... or "your dust"?
Well, actually - something will become ...

[Tank jacket]

The most interesting thing is that as an asymmetric answer, Americans can drop any Boeing remotely or take control, but how many Boeings in our country fly? Examples in the history of darkness, starting from 9/11 and Malaysian in the ocean, etc.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

This is a waste of money for Russia, since the new agreement, which will replace START III, will still ban these weapons.

Somehow, without the United States, we will figure out what we should spend money on, let them look at their military budget first, and then talk about the benefits of such spending for Americans.

[Incvizitor]

Against amerzi as well as against Hitler, all means are good.

[Gennady Fomkin]

We are their Petrels and Poseidons, and much more than that, and they are Katz, Roizman and Sisyan. And so we live the last 150 years.

[Gennady Fomkin]

Simple as a birch log.

[Shadow041]

Let the American official better urge his fellow citizens to get away from the borders of the Russian Federation, and best of all from Europe, then Russia will not have to be afraid.

[Old26]

Quote: KAV

a new agreement to replace START III will still ban these weapons

What a blithe self-confidence! Shish without oil to you, not fulfilling your requirements!

Whether we like it or not, if START-3 is to be prolonged, then the Petrel and Poseidon will be among the weapons systems to which the treaty will apply. It was just that earlier this was done in silence, at the meetings of the Joint Control Commission, now the first thing is to drain into the media and the topic is promoted in the media.

Quote: Lipchanin

And you asked us, will we generally sign any agreements with you?
And you asked us what we will ban, and what not?

Actually, Lavrov is in favor of signing the agreement. And what to prohibit or not to prohibit is the business of negotiators. They will not be able to ban, but to limit the number is easy ...

Quote: astepanov

Moreover, this is called a “terrible weapon” by the country that first created atomic weapons, the only one that has applied it in practice (and unnecessarily also for the civilian population), noted the largest use of chemical weapons in history, which has the largest defense budget in the world and the largest arsenals. Amazing Pharisaism.

let's leave Caesar Caesarean. I think that if we had such a weapon at the end of 45 to save the lives of our soldiers and to break the enemy’s resistance, we would use it in the same way. And compared with the "Kid" or "fat" these systems are really terrible.

Quote: tralflot1832

We would gladly abandon the Petrels, start it up so they don’t want to sit down. We can hardly restrain: Objectives require you to specify! Try to plant an American wise guy!

Andrei! "Do you seriously think that our opponent will not be able to shoot down a subsonic cruise missile ?? Maybe you should still think sometimes before writing, and not" goof it ", earning pluses ???

Quote: marchcat

This is a waste of money for Russia, since the new agreement that will replace START III will still ban these weapons

And that START-3 has already been signed? So, do not indicate how and what we should do ... if the minds themselves do not have enough for such products!

In fact, it was signed 9 years ago, if you do not know about it. And according to one of the articles, new types of weapons can also be introduced into the text of the agreement during its validity or during prolongation. Given the fact that neither the "Petrel" nor the "Poseidon" is in service - the Americans, of course, are trying to remind us of these weapon systems ...

Quote: vavilon

Well, no one has signed the agreement yet and it is not known whether they will sign it, but the Western partner needs to learn to perceive reality, and not to live in their illusions and demand from others what they themselves do not

Judging by the set of illusions in the world of presses, most writers press. And they take reality and will try so that if the agreement is prolonged, these systems are included in the weapons systems listed in the agreement. And we will go for it, if only because it will at least somehow limit such systems. For several years will pass and analogues will appear in them. If they are not mentioned in the contract, this means that we will get a headache, because they have an order of magnitude larger budget than ours and it is easier for them to make such weapons in commodity quantities than we

Quote: NDR-791

Dream, cranks, but sometimes remember that there is nothing worse than a dream come true.

Dreaming, Artem, unfortunately you. And they rely on the provisions of the START-3 treaty ...

Quote: NEXUS

Counter REQUIREMENT-Renounce hegemony, roll up 800 bases around the world, dissolve NATO, and then we'll talk.

Condition to be put forward if there is a desire DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING. But they won’t remove it, but it’s easy to make muck for us. There will be no restrictions for them even easier than for us ...

[bk316]

Do you seriously think that our opponent will not be able to bring down a subsonic cruise missile ??

Obviously not. It's a weapon of retaliation, it starts with the first blow and hangs out a day somewhere above the Pacific Ocean near the shores of Peru. And when the missile defense and anti-aircraft defense cease to exist, it accurately strikes the necessary goals, achieving decision centers.
To shoot down a subsonic missile flying along a closed path at a height of a couple of tens of meters in a deserted region of the world ocean at the current level of development of missile defense and missile defense is IMPOSSIBLE ABSOLUTELY.

And someday we have to agree. That's just the right moment must be chosen. While the US nuclear triad is degrading, and ours is developing to negotiate it is beneficial to them and not to us. Well, plus to everything, the United States still needs to prove its contractual ability, something recently there have been doubts about this in everyone in the world. And you, Vladimir, live in a world where treaties meant something and international law also seemed to exist. It was a good world, but where is it?

[convoy]

“Petrel” is a promising Russian cruise missile of virtually unlimited range. This range is provided by the presence of a nuclear power plant. Earlier in the US, it was stated that Russia does not have the latest weapons, and everything shown during President Putin’s message is “nothing more than an animation”.

I immediately recall the verses ...

Storm, storm is coming soon ..

[Mark kalendarov]

And where is the statement of the Russian Federation demanding the United States to abandon the relevant developments? I do not understand passive behavior and lack of reaction. For these are not jokes, but elements of an information war.
Or have we already lost it? ...

[NordUral]

US official urges Russia to abandon the "terrible" weapons "Petrel" and "Poseidon"

I do not know if there is anything that this Mr. asks to refuse.
But I think that our officials should also be asked to give up the Americans themselves.