US official calls condition for the use of military force against Iran

36

The United States has once again raised the question of how to “confront” Iran. According to US Special Representative for Iran, Brian Hook, the US authorities are ready to consider any options for the development of events - up to military operations. At the same time, Mr. Hook called the condition under which Washington is ready to use military force against Tehran.

According to an American official, such a force will be used by the United States in the event that Iran tries to become the owner of nuclear weapons.



It is important to note here that such a statement was made by the official representative of the country, which itself came out of the agreements aimed at ensuring that Tehran ceases any actions in the field of enrichment of uranium to "weapon" values.

Recall that the multilateral agreement was prepared over several years - the most complicated diplomatic work was carried out with the participation of the Russian Federation. But the USA, having withdrawn from the treaty, actually did everything so that Iran ultimately renounced its obligations. It should also be noted that when withdrawing from the agreement, Washington also imposed sanctions.

Hook said that today “President Trump’s determination to prevent a situation where Iran would be included in the list of nuclear powers is visible.”
  • Facebook / US Army
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    July 1 2020
    Israel to strike first on Iran
    1. +13
      July 1 2020
      And if Iran has a nuclear warhead it will not inflict.
      1. +1
        July 1 2020
        Quote: Pessimist22
        And if Iran has a nuclear warhead it will not inflict.

        A reasonable question arises: Is it beneficial for Russia that Iran has such a warhead?
    2. 0
      July 1 2020
      Israel to strike first on Iran

      Where does this information come from?
  2. +11
    July 1 2020
    Only the presence of nuclear weapons in the modern world is a guarantee that the country that owns such weapons will not be "democratized" by the method of intervention. Israel has nuclear weapons, so why don't the Persians also create nuclear weapons for themselves? ??
    1. -11
      July 1 2020
      Quote: Thrifty
      Only the presence of nuclear weapons in the modern world is a guarantee that the country that owns such weapons will not be "democratized" by the method of intervention.

      if "democratize by intervention"it is impossible that they will do it in softer albeit slow ways.
      1. +8
        July 1 2020
        That is, you support illegal interference in sovereign states?
        1. -4
          July 1 2020
          Quote: 1976AG
          That is, you support illegal interference in sovereign states?

          that is, I state the facts
          1. +2
            July 1 2020
            Quote: Maki Avellevich
            Quote: 1976AG
            That is, you support illegal interference in sovereign states?

            that is, I state the facts

            And the facts today are not in favor of mattresses, at least during the current year, since Iran has twice, demonstratively, lined the hegemon of good slaps with shelling of American bases in Iraq, which remained unanswered, and the tanker delivery of oil to Venezuela and necessary for it oil industry components, despite the threats and screeching from the United States and did not dare to prevent the passage of Iranian tankers.
            1. 0
              July 4 2020
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              And the facts today are not in favor of mattresses, at least during the current year

              I did not give an assessment of actions.
              I voiced a likely plan of action.
              this time I degenerate clearly?
              1. +1
                July 4 2020
                Quote: Maki Avellievich
                this time I degenerate clearly?

                More than.
                Quote: Maki Avellievich
                I did not give an assessment of actions.
                I voiced a likely plan of action.

                As a matter of fact, you didn’t voice the plan, but as you put it, you “stated the facts”, which, alas, didn’t substantively indicate. did not mention, and therefore left the readers the opportunity to look for these facts themselves hi
                PS - And yet, yes, the word "degenerate" must be written through "A" - the test word - to express.
                1. 0
                  July 4 2020
                  it is so pleasant and rare these days to meet a real linguist, who is also ready to lend a hand to the intellectual help of homme borné.
                  thank you for pointing out my prescribing errors.

                  since in Russian I am not explaining myself as elegantly as you, I will try to repay you
                  in latin.

                  Vasa vana pluritum sonant
                  1. +1
                    July 4 2020
                    Quote: Maki Avellievich
                    since in Russian I am not explaining myself as elegantly as you, I will try to repay you
                    in latin.

                    Vasa vana pluritum sonant

                    In Latin, he is not strong, although in 1992 he passed an exam in Latin. By the way I passed it! But due to the lack of practical application in everyday life, as well as remembering that it was necessary to study a dead language, after the exam, he did not come into contact with it for 28 years. Is there "Vasa vana plurimum sonant" something about "clinking empty glasses?" winked
                    P / S- Why did you decide that I think you are "homme borné" - "Foolish person"? Did I somehow point this out?
                    1. 0
                      July 4 2020
                      Quote: Nyrobsky
                      P / S- Why did you decide that I think you are "homme borné" - "Foolish person"? Did I somehow point this out?

                      here is a narrow-minded person.
                      1. 0
                        July 4 2020
                        Quote: Maki Avellevich
                        Quote: Nyrobsky
                        P / S- Why did you decide that I think you are "homme borné" - "Foolish person"? Did I somehow point this out?

                        here is a narrow-minded person.

                        So it doesn't matter, it turned out that I was close to the meaning of the phrase you quoted. Nevertheless, in my comments I did not give a reason to interpret them in the version you indicated. Moreover, I can say that you are "non stultus homo", that is, you are not a stupid person. hi
    2. +1
      July 1 2020
      And the option is to buy if it is very hot. The gigemon is out of all the contracts, a bad example is contagious.
  3. +7
    July 1 2020
    I would let these swindlers in the forefront of the war, so that the words do not diverge from deeds. You look and the number of different warships would be reduced.
    1. +4
      July 1 2020
      Quote: Ros 56
      let the swaggers in the front ranks of the war, so that words would not diverge from deeds. You look and the number of different warships would be reduced.


      So most of all about the war are advocated precisely by those people who will never personally participate in it. But dividends from her have
    2. +2
      July 1 2020
      Applicants, it would be better at home put things in order. In the states, the criminal element is already taking over the city. Oh yes, I completely forgot, this is a rampant democracy, not like in Iran.
  4. +6
    July 1 2020
    Iranians are chosen as a sacred victim? To say that the gigemon can still do something? They survived the nuclear bomb became the guarantor of inviolability and independent politics. I suspect many people thought about whether to have a guarantee of free thought.
    1. +4
      July 1 2020
      Quote: tralflot1832
      The nuclear bomb survived became the guarantor of immunity and independent politics. I suspect many people thought about whether to get hold of the guarantor of free thought.
      Reply

      This has long been thought about thanks to the United States.
  5. 0
    July 1 2020
    According to an American official, such a force will be used by the United States in the event that Iran tries to become the owner of nuclear weapons.

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for the destruction of Israel, right? And this is not Vasya, but the leader of Iran recently.
    It is normal that after such an event Iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons.
    1. +2
      July 1 2020
      Quote: Jack O'Neill
      According to an American official, such a force will be used by the United States in the event that Iran tries to become the owner of nuclear weapons.

      Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for the destruction of Israel, right? And this is not Vasya, but the leader of Iran recently.
      It is normal that after such an event Iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons.

      They prefer not to recall this here ... Unprofitable ... By the way, not only Ahmadinejad spoke about this, but almost everyone who is in power.
  6. +1
    July 1 2020
    Hook said that today “President Trump’s determination to prevent a situation where Iran would be included in the list of nuclear powers is visible.”
    Let the situation in merikatosia be settled first. Things are heading for a civil war, and they all "declare" and "worry". laughing
  7. +2
    July 1 2020
    "the determination of President Trump to prevent a situation where Iran would be included in the list of nuclear powers." 

    So far it turns out ... Either the factory will be bombed by Jews, then a hacker "hit", then a nuclear scientist "that" ...
  8. 0
    July 1 2020
    Ready to oppose any means, even use force, BUT
    if Iran tries to become the owner of nuclear weapons.
    And the wolves are full (American vanity) and the sheep are whole, who do not give a damn about the threats of the United States. The main destabilizing factor in the world is the United States.
  9. 0
    July 1 2020
    also go to the opera
  10. 0
    July 1 2020
    Understand your revolutionaries first
  11. 0
    July 3 2020
    Borzot knows no bounds.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"