Military Review

US official calls condition for the use of military force against Iran

36

The United States has once again raised the question of how to “confront” Iran. According to US Special Representative for Iran, Brian Hook, the US authorities are ready to consider any options for the development of events - up to military operations. At the same time, Mr. Hook called the condition under which Washington is ready to use military force against Tehran.


According to an American official, such a force will be used by the United States in the event that Iran tries to become the owner of nuclear weapons.

It is important to note here that such a statement was made by the official representative of the country, which itself came out of the agreements aimed at ensuring that Tehran ceases any actions in the field of enrichment of uranium to "weapon" values.

Recall that the multilateral agreement was prepared over several years - the most complicated diplomatic work was carried out with the participation of the Russian Federation. But the USA, having withdrawn from the treaty, actually did everything so that Iran ultimately renounced its obligations. It should also be noted that when withdrawing from the agreement, Washington also imposed sanctions.

Hook said that today “President Trump’s determination to prevent a situation where Iran would be included in the list of nuclear powers is visible.”
Photos used:
Facebook / US Army
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Samara_63
    Samara_63 1 July 2020 06: 13 New
    +2
    Israel to strike first on Iran
    1. Pessimist22
      Pessimist22 1 July 2020 06: 26 New
      13
      And if Iran has a nuclear warhead it will not inflict.
      1. alone
        alone 1 July 2020 11: 35 New
        +1
        Quote: Pessimist22
        And if Iran has a nuclear warhead it will not inflict.

        A reasonable question arises: Is it beneficial for Russia that Iran has such a warhead?
    2. Interlocutor
      Interlocutor 1 July 2020 19: 35 New
      0
      Israel to strike first on Iran

      Where does this information come from?
  2. Thrifty
    Thrifty 1 July 2020 06: 16 New
    11
    Only the presence of nuclear weapons is in the modern world a guarantee that the country that owns such weapons will not be "democratized" by the intervention method. Israel has nuclear weapons, so why don't the Persians create nuclear weapons too? ??
    1. Maki Avellevich
      Maki Avellevich 1 July 2020 07: 15 New
      -11
      Quote: Thrifty
      Only the presence of nuclear weapons is in the modern world a guarantee that the country that owns such weapons will not be "democratized" by the intervention method.

      if "democratize by intervention"it’s impossible, they will do it in milder, albeit slower ways.
      1. 1976AG
        1976AG 1 July 2020 07: 35 New
        +8
        That is, you support illegal interference in sovereign states?
        1. Maki Avellevich
          Maki Avellevich 1 July 2020 09: 34 New
          -4
          Quote: 1976AG
          That is, you support illegal interference in sovereign states?

          that is, I state the facts
          1. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky 1 July 2020 11: 44 New
            +2
            Quote: Maki Avellevich
            Quote: 1976AG
            That is, you support illegal interference in sovereign states?

            that is, I state the facts

            And the facts today are not in favor of mattresses, at least during the current year, since Iran has twice, demonstratively, lined the hegemon of good slaps with shelling of American bases in Iraq, which remained unanswered, and the tanker delivery of oil to Venezuela and necessary for it oil industry components, despite the threats and screeching from the United States and did not dare to prevent the passage of Iranian tankers.
            1. Maki Avellevich
              Maki Avellevich 4 July 2020 13: 35 New
              0
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              And the facts today are not in favor of mattresses, at least during the current year

              I did not give an assessment of actions.
              I voiced a likely plan of action.
              this time I degenerate clearly?
              1. Nyrobsky
                Nyrobsky 4 July 2020 15: 27 New
                +1
                Quote: Maki Avellevich
                this time I degenerate clearly?

                More than.
                Quote: Maki Avellevich
                I did not give an assessment of actions.
                I voiced a likely plan of action.

                As a matter of fact, you didn’t voice the plan, but as you put it, you “stated the facts”, which, alas, did not indicate in detail, i.e. they didn’t mention, and therefore left the opportunity for readers to search for these facts themselves hi
                PS - And yet, yes, the word "degenerate" must be written through "A" - a test word - to express.
                1. Maki Avellevich
                  Maki Avellevich 4 July 2020 17: 05 New
                  0
                  it is so pleasant and rare these days to meet a real linguist, who is also ready to lend a hand to the intellectual help of homme borné.
                  thank you for pointing out my prescribing errors.

                  since in Russian I am not explaining myself as elegantly as you, I will try to repay you
                  in latin.

                  Vasa vana plurimum sonant
                  1. Nyrobsky
                    Nyrobsky 4 July 2020 20: 29 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Maki Avellevich
                    since in Russian I am not explaining myself as elegantly as you, I will try to repay you
                    in latin.

                    Vasa vana plurimum sonant

                    He is not strong in Latin, although in 1992 he passed the Latin exam. By the way I passed! But for lack of practice in everyday life, as well as remembering that he had to study a dead language, after the exam he was not in contact with him for 28 years. Here, "Vasa vana plurimum sonant" is something about "the sound of empty glasses?" winked
                    P / S- Why did you decide that I think you are "homme borné" - "Silly man"? Did I somehow point out this?
                    1. Maki Avellevich
                      Maki Avellevich 4 July 2020 20: 47 New
                      0
                      Quote: Nyrobsky
                      P / S- Why did you decide that I think you are "homme borné" - "Silly man"? Did I somehow point out this?

                      here is a narrow-minded person.
                      1. Nyrobsky
                        Nyrobsky 4 July 2020 21: 52 New
                        0
                        Quote: Maki Avellevich
                        Quote: Nyrobsky
                        P / S- Why did you decide that I think you are "homme borné" - "Silly man"? Did I somehow point out this?

                        here is a narrow-minded person.

                        So all the same, it turned out that I was close to the meaning of the phrase you quoted. Nevertheless, in my comments I did not give a reason to interpret them in the version you indicated. Moreover, I can say that you are "non stultus homo", in other words - not a stupid person. hi
    2. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 1 July 2020 07: 41 New
      +1
      And the option is to buy if it is very hot. The gigemon is out of all the contracts, a bad example is contagious.
  3. Ros 56
    Ros 56 1 July 2020 06: 19 New
    +7
    I would let these swindlers in the forefront of the war, so that the words do not diverge from deeds. You look and the number of different warships would be reduced.
    1. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 1 July 2020 08: 35 New
      +4
      Quote: Ros 56
      let the swaggers in the front ranks of the war, so that words would not diverge from deeds. You look and the number of different warships would be reduced.


      So most of all about the war are advocated precisely by those people who will never personally participate in it. But dividends from her have
    2. orionvitt
      orionvitt 1 July 2020 09: 02 New
      +2
      Applicants, it would be better at home put things in order. In the states, the criminal element is already taking over the city. Oh yes, I completely forgot, this is a rampant democracy, not like in Iran.
  4. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 1 July 2020 07: 05 New
    +6
    Iranians are chosen as a sacred victim? To say that the gigemon can still do something? They survived the nuclear bomb became the guarantor of inviolability and independent politics. I suspect many people thought about whether to have a guarantee of free thought.
    1. Cyril G ...
      Cyril G ... 1 July 2020 08: 27 New
      +4
      Quote: tralflot1832
      The nuclear bomb survived became the guarantor of immunity and independent politics. I suspect many people thought about whether to get hold of the guarantor of free thought.
      Reply

      This has long been thought about thanks to the United States.
  5. Jack O'Neill
    Jack O'Neill 1 July 2020 09: 46 New
    0
    According to an American official, such a force will be used by the United States in the event that Iran tries to become the owner of nuclear weapons.

    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for the destruction of Israel, right? And this is not Vasya, but the leader of Iran recently.
    It is normal that after such an event Iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons.
    1. alone
      alone 1 July 2020 11: 43 New
      +2
      Quote: Jack O'Neill
      According to an American official, such a force will be used by the United States in the event that Iran tries to become the owner of nuclear weapons.

      Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for the destruction of Israel, right? And this is not Vasya, but the leader of Iran recently.
      It is normal that after such an event Iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons.

      They prefer not to recall this here ... Unprofitable ... By the way, not only Ahmadinejad spoke about this, but almost everyone who is in power.
  6. aszzz888
    aszzz888 1 July 2020 10: 01 New
    +1
    Hook said that today “President Trump’s determination to prevent a situation where Iran would be included in the list of nuclear powers is visible.”
    First let the situation in meritosia settle down. It is a matter of civil war, and they all “declare” and “worry.” laughing
  7. Doccor18
    Doccor18 1 July 2020 10: 04 New
    +2
    "the determination of President Trump to prevent a situation where Iran would be included in the list of nuclear powers."

    So far it turns out ... The Jews will bomb the plant, the hacker "hitting", the nuclear scientist "that" ...
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 1 July 2020 10: 34 New
    0
    Ready to oppose any means, even use force, BUT
    if Iran tries to become the owner of nuclear weapons.
    And the wolves are full (American vanity) and the sheep are whole, who do not give a damn about the threats of the United States. The main destabilizing factor in the world is the United States.
  9. APAHAKC
    APAHAKC 1 July 2020 21: 44 New
    0
    also go to the opera
  10. fraders
    fraders 1 July 2020 21: 55 New
    0
    Understand your revolutionaries first
  11. 7 poplar
    7 poplar 3 July 2020 00: 00 New
    0
    Borzot knows no bounds.