Military Review

Appeared data at voting on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation

363

In the Russian Federation, voting continues to amend the Constitution of the country. Due to the need to take into account the adverse epidemiological situation, they decided not to limit this event to one day, but to carry out it from June 25 to July 1 inclusive.


Over the past five days, voter turnout was 28 percent. At the same time, almost 31 million people voted, including remotely. More than half of them (58 percent) cast their votes in specially designated polling stations. Another 39 percent chose to vote at the place of residence, that is, inside houses or apartments, as well as in the adjacent territory.

This is reported by the publication RIA News.

Also at this time in Moscow and the Nizhny Novgorod region there is a vote on amendments to the Constitution in electronic form. This opportunity has already taken advantage of 80 percent of voters who registered in advance. Out of more than 1 registered e-voting participants, the number of people casting their votes exceeded 190 thousand.

At the same time, the VTsIOM has already managed to present data not just about the voters, but about those who voted for the amendments. The statistics service claims that 76 percent of those who voted for amendments to the Basic Law, on the basis of some anonymous exit polls.
363 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Sergei 777
    Sergei 777 29 June 2020 14: 16 New
    25
    The statistics service claims that 76 percent of those who voted in favor of amendments to the Basic Law.

    Uh ... strange to say the least.
    1. Looking Petrovich
      Looking Petrovich 29 June 2020 14: 20 New
      21
      Quote: Sergey 777
      The statistics service claims that 76 percent of those who voted in favor of amendments to the Basic Law.

      Uh ... strange to say the least.

      76% of them are so customary to draw. Edro in the Duma also has 76% of the seats, although no one votes for it.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Malyuta
        Malyuta 29 June 2020 14: 43 New
        -23
        Quote: Looking Petrovich
        76% of them are so customary to draw. Edro in the Duma also has 76% of the seats, although no one votes for it.

        76 + 76 = 152% !!! Where are you fools, where? It is necessary 146 wassat
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 29 June 2020 15: 12 New
          -13
          76 + 76 = 152% !!! Where are you fools, where? It is necessary 146

          The article is not complete in terms of information.
          Sociologists paid for duralities could not resist publishing. negative
          Moreover, they only 70% agreed to answer their questions.
          You can goof around as much as you like, but you could turn your head on: to think why exactly the numbers do not beat you? lol
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 29 June 2020 15: 34 New
            -9
            Sociologists paid for duralities could not resist publishing.

            The fact that "the customer of the survey did not object to the publication of the results" - the head of VTsIOM himself said. Verbatim.
            1. military_cat
              military_cat 29 June 2020 15: 56 New
              22
              Those who threw in the "results" - they know what they are doing. People tend to be conformists, and feel the urge to "join the majority", so those who are "for" will argue as "how many of ours are there, we must go too, since everyone is coming", and those who are "against" they will think "well, I'm in the minority, what's the point of going if everyone wants Putin for another 20 years." This is not a very noble mental mechanism, but it exists, and political strategists skillfully use it. This is exactly the very reason why it is forbidden to publish interim results of calculations before the end of the vote, but now the vote is bypassing any laws on referendum.
              1. Alex777
                Alex777 29 June 2020 16: 04 New
                +7
                I would not publish such crooked facts.
                76% for out of 70% who agreed to answer.
                As a result, the real "for" the amendments - a little more than 50%.
                And the presentation was such that a feeling formed - everyone had already decided and everything was predetermined. hi
                1. military_cat
                  military_cat 29 June 2020 16: 05 New
                  -1
                  For the sake of filing, everything is done.
                  1. Doccor18
                    Doccor18 29 June 2020 17: 55 New
                    -4
                    For the sake of filing, everything is done.

                    Straight slogan 20 years of rule
                2. bk316
                  bk316 29 June 2020 17: 46 New
                  -9
                  76% for out of 70% who agreed to answer.
                  As a result, the real "for" the amendments - a little more than 50%.

                  Not right, two Sasha for math.
                  The rest is more or less correct.
                  I’m not sure that GDP will not go for another term.
                  1. Alex777
                    Alex777 29 June 2020 18: 01 New
                    -1
                    Little Johnny!
                    What do you think you found a mistake?
                    1. bk316
                      bk316 30 June 2020 11: 25 New
                      +3
                      What do you think you found a mistake?

                      Everything is very simple: out of those 30% who did not answer, someone will also vote in favor.
                      Therefore, multiply the probability of error. You will not get a statistically correct result, but a very rough estimate from below.

                      It is necessary to take into account that you have obtained 2 samples and add the probabilities by calculating the total probability (this is like calculating the probability of hitting a target with several missiles). At the same time, we must try to take into account that the samples can be biased, if this is impossible (there is no information about the bias), then the bias in the unknown sample is taken equal to the bias in the known one and the accuracy decreases.

                      In your case, the result is the same 76%. Only the accuracy drops to 15% (I greatly simplified the accuracy)

                      EH USE USE ......
                      1. Alex777
                        Alex777 30 June 2020 11: 40 New
                        -3
                        Everything is very simple: out of those 30% who did not answer, someone will also vote in favor.

                        I proceed from the fact that those who did not respond would most likely vote against.
                        Only the accuracy drops to 15% (I greatly simplified the accuracy)

                        Surveys with such accuracy can be immediately thrown away. Accuracy should not be more than 5%. No way.
                        EH USE USE ......

                        Wacky stamps are not tired? Do you have one shkolota around? Do you work as a teacher?
                        Or have you reached academic heights?
                        I graduated from Moscow State University in the 20th century. And I imagine how polls are conducted. Friends have been doing this all their lives.
                        That is why I alone noticed that 76% of the result is from 70% .. The rest did not even notice.
                        Parental position is not for you. lol
                      2. bk316
                        bk316 30 June 2020 15: 14 New
                        +1
                        I proceed from the fact that those who did not respond would most likely vote against.

                        This is a bad, unsubstantiated hypothesis. For example, in VO 90% shout that against amendments laughing

                        I graduated from Moscow State University in the 20th century.

                        True and which faculty? What specialty? What year?

                        Well, yes, my grandfather’s position suits me more laughing
                      3. Alex777
                        Alex777 30 June 2020 19: 02 New
                        0
                        I proceed from the fact that those who did not respond would most likely vote against.

                        This is a bad, unsubstantiated hypothesis. For example, in VO 90% shout that against amendments

                        I say that those who refused to answer sociologists voted против.
                        You say that in VO 90% против amendments.
                        What is the difference? Where did you see the unconfirmed hypothesis?
                        Just it all fits together. wink
                        True and which faculty? What specialty? What year?

                        Maybe you and the key to the apartment where the money is? wink
                        If you have a relationship with Moscow State University, then you’ll understand where I come from.
                        My military specialization is air defense. bully
                      4. bk316
                        bk316 1 July 2020 14: 53 New
                        -1
                        Maybe you and the key to the apartment where the money is?

                        Well, if you are so afraid to name the faculty that you graduated from, tell me in which building the occupations of the military department were, what the building was called, what was in the first semester and what title the head of the department had. laughing

                        Where did you see the unconfirmed hypothesis?

                        You have a hypothesis that those who are against the constitution are silent about this.
                        And those 90% who are in VO against the constitution SCREAM about it.
                        Either your hypothesis is incorrect or the VO sample is fundamentally different from the random one. If household does not correspond to the people of the Russian Federation.

                        About friends and classmates just laugh. I have a famous surgeon's classmate, entrust me to operate on you? laughing
        2. Alex777
          Alex777 29 June 2020 16: 09 New
          -4
          Those who threw in the "results" - they know what they are doing.

          People from power organized the swamp too.
          But their goals were completely their own.
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 29 June 2020 18: 03 New
            +5
            It's funny Is it true that marshy eyes pierce? wink
            Or until now it didn’t come to who worked there?
        3. Klingon
          Klingon 29 June 2020 19: 16 New
          -6
          yes, herd mentality, base instinct, but it works. Here's an example for you: my wife voted against, I do not vote because I cannot TK. I don’t have any snils there (I don’t even know that this is a shopping center, we have been living in Germany for a long time, but we have Russian citizenship), but I would vote against it. And mother-in-law and grandmother voted FOR, my wife and I asked damn what for voted FOR? and mother-in-law grit and what, "Lucy (sister) voted FOR, well, we too"
          And believe me, these are the majority who do not think with their own head but do it like everyone
          1. doubovitski
            doubovitski 29 June 2020 23: 25 New
            -2
            Quote: Klingon
            yes, herd mentality, base instinct, but it works. Here's an example for you: my wife voted against, I do not vote because I cannot TK. I don’t have any snils there (I don’t even know that this is a shopping center, we have been living in Germany for a long time, but we have Russian citizenship), but I would vote against it. And mother-in-law and grandmother voted FOR, my wife and I asked damn what for voted FOR? and mother-in-law grit and what, "Lucy (sister) voted FOR, well, we too"
            And believe me, these are the majority who do not think with their own head but do it like everyone

            By your delirium, I still do not understand, are you FOR or AGAIN? are you sculpting about your mother-in-law, about my spouse, about ..... The head itself, as she herself thinks, or does Frau Merkel listen to the broadcast?
          2. Nemchinov Vl
            Nemchinov Vl 30 June 2020 21: 06 New
            +1
            Quote: Klingon
            gregarious feeling, base instinct, but it works. here's an example for you: my wife voted against, I don’t vote because I can’t TC. I don’t have any snails there (I don’t even know that it’s TC, we have been living in Germany for a long time,
            Well, you then know better from Germany, with dual citizenship .... although it seems there are part of the amendments against this for persons holding state. posts ...?! which in my opinion is correctlike priority of its judicial law over international (!). Otherwise, for the sake of market conditions (under the customer), in international court (let's say in The Hague)your country by political conspiracy "will be brought to their knees in court verdicts," and you have no right to object (!!), even if right, as well as challenge (!!).
            1. Klingon
              Klingon 1 July 2020 01: 16 New
              -2
              I do NOT have dual citizenship, but only Russian citizenship.
              what? Then I didn’t understand why you are all this, about which country?
        4. NordUral
          NordUral 29 June 2020 19: 27 New
          0
          I agree with you, military_cat. Prior to yesterday's throw-in about 31, the lemon of the voters was tossed about what to do. But today I decided - I’ll go and vote against it.
          Although it is clear that crooks all rigged, act brazenly, without fear of anything. But just waiting for the sea weather is not for me.
          1. IS-80_RVGK2
            IS-80_RVGK2 29 June 2020 23: 54 New
            -6
            Quote: NordUral
            Although it’s clear that the crooks are all fraudulent, they act impudently, without fearing anything, but just waiting for the weather by the sea is not for me.

            So you decided to go and play along with the system. Logic where are you? Hand face.
            1. NordUral
              NordUral 30 June 2020 09: 59 New
              -3
              For starters - no need to poke me.
              But in fact - they do not use my ballot and I will say no to swindlers in power!
              1. IS-80_RVGK2
                IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 10: 19 New
                0
                Quote: NordUral
                But in fact - they do not use my ballot and I will say no to swindlers in power!

                Already funny. They used you to legitimize the vote. But you believe that you voted against in the system of bourgeois elections, dealt capital a mortal blow. laughing With such leftists, no rightists are needed.
                1. NordUral
                  NordUral 30 June 2020 10: 24 New
                  -2
                  With people like you, who always hide under sofas, this power is and will be.
                2. IS-80_RVGK2
                  IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 10: 46 New
                  -1
                  What is the use of your activity if you play up to power with your actions?
                3. valek97
                  valek97 30 June 2020 11: 26 New
                  +1
                  And what's the point of thinking so if there is no lower turnout? There is only one struggle, the more conscious citizens appear, the better. And they will always have time to catch up with people from under the sticks.
                4. IS-80_RVGK2
                  IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 11: 49 New
                  0
                  Nevertheless, the authorities for some reason drive people through the administrative resource to vote. Yes, of course, just sitting at home is not the best choice, but it is definitely better than a protest vote.
              2. NordUral
                NordUral 30 June 2020 11: 50 New
                0
                Do you undermine it with your inaction? I agree, the question is complex. And you don’t know which is better. But action is better than silence and passive protest.
                Already one half-glass says that extended in time and space must be actively implemented. Just like your silence like the lambs of Aunt Valais.
              3. Alex777
                Alex777 30 June 2020 12: 02 New
                +1
                This is a dull troll. Feeding him is an empty matter.
                Read his posts on the profile.
                In addition to rudeness to strangers, stamps and hatred, there is nothing there. bully
              4. NordUral
                NordUral 30 June 2020 12: 12 New
                0
                Alexander, I actually spoke about Matvienko. And who are you talking about?
              5. Alex777
                Alex777 30 June 2020 12: 13 New
                0
                IS-80_RVGK2 (Makar)
              6. NordUral
                NordUral 30 June 2020 12: 15 New
                +1
                Thank! This buddy just hit me.
              7. Alex777
                Alex777 30 June 2020 12: 26 New
                0
                When they come upon me, I go into the profile and look: when it appeared and what it writes to others.
                If the person is normal - I answer. hi
                This one wrote to me yesterday. bully
              8. IS-80_RVGK2
                IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 12: 46 New
                -2
                Sasha, I do not organically digest liars, but even more stupid ones. Which for some reason decided that they are smarter than me. So you yourself are to blame for your pain and suffering.
              9. NordUral
                NordUral 30 June 2020 12: 59 New
                +1
                I myself do it sometimes, but more often I answer foolishly. But do not do this - feed the enemies.
      3. IS-80_RVGK2
        IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 12: 40 New
        -3
        The schoolboy bakes everything from how you shamefully merged? laughing
      4. IS-80_RVGK2
        IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 12: 45 New
        -2
        Empty business is your middle name. laughing Really smart and interesting people on the site less and less, but pathos schoolchildren drove like you.
    2. IS-80_RVGK2
      IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 12: 39 New
      -2
      I have repeatedly told you why it’s better not to go to the polls. What am I, Lenin wrote about this a hundred years ago. But you persistently want to ride a rake.
  • doubovitski
    doubovitski 29 June 2020 23: 23 New
    -3
    Quote: Malyuta
    Quote: Looking Petrovich
    76% of them are so customary to draw. Edro in the Duma also has 76% of the seats, although no one votes for it.

    76 + 76 = 152% !!! Where are you fools, where? It is necessary 146 wassat

    Should drink less. You need to drink less. And the numbers bloodied in the eyes will not loom.
  • Aleksey Aleksandrovich
    Aleksey Aleksandrovich 30 June 2020 18: 37 New
    0
    [quote = Malyuta]
    [/ Quote]
    76 + 76 = 152% !!! Where are you fools, where? It is necessary 146 wassat[/ Quote]

    Do not need 146, you need 50% + 1 vote. And that is all.
    And you at least get away with your zeroing, it may feel better.hi
  • tracer
    tracer 30 June 2020 18: 55 New
    0
    Malyuta you as "shipoku" are going to do about this. Or you will squeal like the same Mazepa “I’ll give it away” ... You are our disco dancer to the liburacienov rainbow Dudka.
  • Domestic cat
    Domestic cat 1 July 2020 13: 24 New
    +1
    The first number will add percentages.
  • Svarog
    Svarog 29 June 2020 14: 48 New
    +4
    Quote: Looking Petrovich
    76% of them are so customary to draw. Edro in the Duma also has 76% of the seats, although no one votes for it.

    I thought 72% would support, but here 76% .. mdya .. well, on the whole I didn’t make a lot of mistakes, everything is predictable ... and sad.
    1. unaha
      unaha 29 June 2020 14: 50 New
      -3
      Nothing, in the end it will be exactly 72, I suppose. Those who are “against” will come first and will slightly “lower” the indicators.
      1. Woodman
        Woodman 29 June 2020 14: 58 New
        16
        Quote: unaha
        Those who are "against" will come first and will slightly "reduce" the indicators.

        And what prevents those who are "against" from coming earlier? Not 1st, but 29th or 30th? Or will they go in an organized way? Under strict guidance and vigilant supervision?
        1. unaha
          unaha 29 June 2020 15: 06 New
          +2
          Not at all. "Under careful guidance and vigilant control" are usually just those who in advance (and this, by the way, not only state employees, previously asked employees of large corporations to "show consciousness". As now, I don’t know, I didn’t ask). And those who are against just the overwhelming majority will not come at all. In any case, I have no acquaintances - "for", but literally a couple of people will also participate in this booth.
          I myself can’t decide whether it’s worth going with a known result (and yes - I don’t have the slightest confidence in this "poll").
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 29 June 2020 15: 16 New
            -24
            Remember how fun they lived under Yeltsin. Especially senior citizens.
            1. unaha
              unaha 29 June 2020 15: 19 New
              20
              I understand correctly that ANY movement other than the one prescribed by the current authorities returns the country to "how merrily we lived under Yeltsin"? Those. are we exclusively on the rails - either forward or backward? Neither right nor left, nor bounce in the end?
              1. Alex777
                Alex777 29 June 2020 15: 32 New
                -8
                The neighbors bounced repeatedly:
                After Kravchuk there was Kuchma-get.
                After Kuchma - Yushchenko fear.
                After Yushchenko - Yanukovych-Zlochnin.
                After Yanukovych - Poroshenko.
                Well, now Zelensky. wink
                Do you want to learn from your mistakes?
                I would be preferable to strangers. hi
                1. unaha
                  unaha 29 June 2020 15: 34 New
                  -8
                  "Do you want to learn from your mistakes?" So I learned - or do you not remember the USSR finals? Do you want to step on this rake one more time? It will hurt even more.
                  1. Alex777
                    Alex777 29 June 2020 15: 45 New
                    +5
                    I understand very well, thanks to whom Russia is now a single state and did not fall into pieces, as many wanted it to.
                  2. unaha
                    unaha 29 June 2020 17: 00 New
                    -3
                    So I remember. But if his current actions lead in the long run to the same collapse?
                  3. Alex777
                    Alex777 29 June 2020 17: 02 New
                    -4
                    Do not lead. The enemies would like that. But they will not break off. hi
                    By the way, on the basis of what are you making such conclusions about the collapse?
                  4. unaha
                    unaha 29 June 2020 17: 18 New
                    -2
                    Let me give you a simple example. Once a passenger plane fell from Moscow to Perm. Then several owners of large local companies were killed. 3 of them did not become very fast then. The owners of these companies were also executive directors, and ALL processes of the companies were closed only to themselves. First, there was a paralysis of management, then the heirs finished off tearing off pieces. With the amendments, Putin becomes the same "owner".
                  5. Alex777
                    Alex777 29 June 2020 17: 21 New
                    -12
                    My IMHO:
                    1. amendments are a legacy of GDP (and in this part I fully support it).
                    2. he will not go to the next term.
                    3. Zeroing is needed for him to calmly transfer power.
                    4. He has already done a lot of things so that after his departure everything does not fall apart and for another 4 years, he has got to work in this direction. hi
                  6. military_cat
                    military_cat 29 June 2020 20: 06 New
                    +4
                    Quote: Alex777
                    2. he will not go to the next term.
                    3. Zeroing is needed for him to calmly transfer power.
                    You are so naive, I don’t even know whether to be moved or terrified.
                  7. Alex777
                    Alex777 29 June 2020 23: 55 New
                    -3
                    Have you quarantined here in early March? wink
                    It seems like a clever man ...
                2. AnpeL
                  AnpeL 29 June 2020 22: 02 New
                  -5
                  3. Zeroing is needed for him to calmly transfer power.

                  But do we want the power to be so calmly transferred from hand to hand?
                3. Alex777
                  Alex777 29 June 2020 22: 29 New
                  +5
                  The plan for revolution has been fulfilled by Russia. Enough.
                4. IS-80_RVGK2
                  IS-80_RVGK2 29 June 2020 23: 57 New
                  -7
                  Quote: Alex777
                  The plan for revolution has been fulfilled by Russia. Enough.

                  Are you still not tired of broadcasting this nonsense?
                5. Alex777
                  Alex777 29 June 2020 23: 57 New
                  +4
                  Do you want to fix one more?
                6. IS-80_RVGK2
                  IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 00: 15 New
                  -7
                  I would like the revolution to demolish this system today. But I am a realist. And I understand perfectly that so far this is not possible. But I also understand that sooner or later there will be a revolution. And better sooner than later. I’m just wondering, have you ever thought about this phrase about the plan for revolutions? Because it’s really rubbish. A revolution is inevitable. And the fact that it will be predetermined not by someone’s dreams and wants, but by the objective process of evolution of human society.
                7. Alex777
                  Alex777 30 June 2020 00: 18 New
                  +1
                  There will be no revolution. I promise you. hi
                  GDP is kind too.
                  The successor will be stricter.
                  Didn’t come to mind? wink
                8. IS-80_RVGK2
                  IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 00: 20 New
                  -6
                  You just don’t understand who you are saying this to. For me, this cheap self-confidence, based on nothing, does not work. Argue or go to school boy.
                9. Alex777
                  Alex777 30 June 2020 00: 22 New
                  +1
                  Ah ha ha ha ha ... As if you understand who you are talking to. lol
                  I’ll tell you one thing - I’m not retired yet.
                  So see you if that. wink
                10. IS-80_RVGK2
                  IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 00: 27 New
                  -6
                  Some kind of schoolboy most likely. Smoked history book.
                11. Alex777
                  Alex777 30 June 2020 00: 31 New
                  +1
                  Do not judge others by yourself. lol
                12. IS-80_RVGK2
                  IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 00: 34 New
                  -5
                  I judge you exclusively by you and your like.
        2. IS-80_RVGK2
          IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 00: 24 New
          -5
          What does the good or strict have to do with it? You really don’t understand what the economy is, what are the contradictions in the capitalist system? What is class theory and class struggle? If not, go to school boy. I have nothing to talk about with you. You are too stupid and uneducated yet.
        3. Alex777
          Alex777 30 June 2020 00: 27 New
          -1
          Eccentric. I have been leading serious people since I was 91 years old. lol
          And I don’t know about economics from textbooks, and I lived in the capitalist system for almost 10 years.
          However, with your conceit we really have nothing to talk about.
        4. IS-80_RVGK2
          IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 00: 32 New
          -5
          Let me tell you a student for the Internet. There are no authorities. And in general, you are funny. A person who can not clearly argue his point of view leads serious people. Ha ha ha
        5. Alex777
          Alex777 30 June 2020 00: 34 New
          +1
          Because it’s an adult, so I won’t be involved in children's provocations.
          Rest, hero of the invisible front. lol
        6. IS-80_RVGK2
          IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 00: 37 New
          -7
          Why did you go so quickly through the pipes, demagogue? Just a little more bother.
        7. Alex777
          Alex777 30 June 2020 00: 51 New
          +1
          Hand face. Have a rest. wink
          The fact that "demagogue" is one of the 100 words that you use, I already understood. bully
          Immediately I remember about "..that will get both war and shame."

          You quoted me when you answered Oyo Sarkazmi 28 June 2020 13:29, "great and terrible" Makar.
          Churchill's original phrase is otherwise composed. lol
          I know how. You are not.
        8. IS-80_RVGK2
          IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 00: 59 New
          -8
          Oh, he got out of the pipe and decided to fight. Well, OK. I just don’t remember the phrase Churchill either uttered or not. I don’t care. So you have Churchill? Again, there are problems with medicines in the insane asylum. So what's up with the argument for the revolution? Will I hear something intelligible or will you again begin to carry any nonsense and nonsense?
        9. Alex777
          Alex777 30 June 2020 01: 05 New
          0
          Rest your mitt. That’s all I have for such a hero. lol
          Calling all schoolchildren is the skill of argumentation. wink
          At school, your education is obviously over.
          And there ... Leather ball ... Golden puck ... bully
          So you have Churchill?

          Do you know who Churchill is?
          It seems not, since they managed to write such a surname with an error.
          Is free.
        10. IS-80_RVGK2
          IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 01: 09 New
          -8
          Quote: Alex777
          It seems not, since they managed to write such a surname with an error.

          The argument is just brilliance. And most importantly, this student considers himself smart. So what's up with the revolutions? Will I hear anything intelligible? You seem to be a humanist, they like to find fault with spelling because essentially they have nothing to say. laughing Are you back in the pipe? Well, what is boredom.
        11. Alex777
          Alex777 30 June 2020 01: 12 New
          0
          Makar! You are also deaf. Have a rest.
          The last third time you answered. wink
          You are boring and not interesting to me.
          All that you can say, I have already read. lol
          Yet.
        12. IS-80_RVGK2
          IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 01: 17 New
          -7
          Of course not interesting. You wanted to show off and merged like the last sucker. laughing And now you're trying to play the insulted innocence of an intellectual. Although there is neither innocence nor even the beginnings of intelligence.
  • Nemchinov Vl
    Nemchinov Vl 30 June 2020 21: 19 New
    0
    Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
    But I also understand that sooner or later there will be a revolution. And better sooner than later.
    Well then, let it be now in England or in the USA !!! yes
    Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
    A revolution is inevitable. And the fact that it will be predetermined not by someone’s dreams and wants, but by the objective process of evolution of human society.
    belay winked
    Quote: Alex777
    There will be no revolution. I promise you.
    sad
  • unaha
    unaha 30 June 2020 08: 49 New
    +2
    "he needs zeroing for a quiet transfer of power" - here we have a fundamental difference of views. From my point of view, it is not he who should look for a successor and transfer power, but we are the citizens of the country!
  • Alex777
    Alex777 30 June 2020 09: 39 New
    +1
    I am not a great writer and in a short post I miss some shades of what I want to say. As it is. hi
    Great writer is Prilepin.
    Read. Regarding the calm transfer of power, he described everything well, in my opinion.
    Although I am by no means his fan.
    It’s like the thought that the Russian head didn’t utter: “If you’ll be shaken, gentlemen generals, marshals, inhabitants of the Kremlin towers, political exiles, American and European partners, I won’t go anywhere. Sit quietly. "
    There is no other way to convey this idea than in this form — by setting the deadline to zero — no. No one will believe in any other promises and threats. “Okay, they’ll say, don’t be afraid. Sit down and leave, now we’ll dance here without you. ”
    But they will believe in this message. All players will have to humble gestures. Their successors are no longer needed. Those who want to get the Moscow throne will need to lie low and wait in silence for how it will end. If absolutely rude: then no Rothschilds will invest a billion dollars in Khodorkovsky, because after zeroing the meaning of these investments will significantly decrease. And the FSB will not butt with the GRU, and the second tower of the Kremlin with the third - for the same reason - why butting something, the chair still will not be vacated.
    At the same time, I secretly think that the incumbent president is tired, that he is sick of everything, that he wants to live without all of this. That he will leave as soon as his term ends. But he would not want to end his reign in the midst of a natural battle between Russian and foreign special services for the Russian throne. He would like to calmly bring the ship to the harbor - so that the massacre would not begin on this ship on the road. Bring and hand the helm to the applicants. In the atmosphere of the very stability that has been talked about so often in recent years. And not in an atmosphere of all-Russian psychosis.

    https://vz.ru/opinions/2020/6/22/1046326.html
  • flicker
    flicker 29 June 2020 21: 37 New
    +3
    With the amendments, Putin becomes the same "owner"
    Quite the contrary, the amendments redistribute power: part of the presidential functions are transferred to the parliament and the Federation Council, in addition, the latter will have more powers than they had.
    ---
    The amendments should ensure such a redistribution of power between all branches - so that state power becomes more stable and does not depend on the will of one president.
  • Rzzz
    Rzzz 29 June 2020 20: 15 New
    0
    Quote: Alex777
    I understand very well, thanks to whom Russia is now a single state

    And to whom?
    Quote: Alex777
    It didn’t fall to pieces, as many wanted it.

    Who specifically wanted this, please explain. Only about malicious Americans is not necessary, this is not even funny.
  • 4ekist
    4ekist 29 June 2020 17: 32 New
    0
    Why remember x @ hlov here, these were still not enough.
    1. DVR
      DVR 29 June 2020 18: 37 New
      +3
      Why remember x @ hlov here, these were still not enough.

      There are enough of them here, you probably don’t notice :)
    2. Alex777
      Alex777 29 June 2020 22: 31 New
      +2
      Yes, the number of minuses that I received when reminding them of their glorious history speaks directly about this. bully
    3. DVR
      DVR 29 June 2020 22: 48 New
      +3
      Yes, the number of minuses that I received when reminding them of their glorious history speaks directly about this.

      There is such a thing, I don’t pay attention to it :) These ratings and pluses are important to them (but they are never recognized), they form the agenda here, public opinion. And I, for fun in my free time.
    4. Alex777
      Alex777 29 June 2020 22: 56 New
      +2
      So I get in when it matters to me.
      By the way, the fact that GDP will not go for the 5th term is not one I think. hi
      https://vz.ru/opinions/2020/6/22/1046326.html
    5. DVR
      DVR 29 June 2020 23: 03 New
      +4
      By the way, the fact that GDP will not go for the 5th term is not one I think.

      Initially, I estimated the possibility of this with a probability of 50%. But, I think that we will find out the final answer only closer to the elections. Yes, and the dynamics of processes can still affect the final decisionhi
    6. Alex777
      Alex777 29 June 2020 23: 05 New
      0
      I even know where to go. But I won’t tell you yet. Early. hi
      A lot of sensible people are doing now.
      And thank God that those who don’t need this do not see it.
    7. DVR
      DVR 29 June 2020 23: 07 New
      +1
      I even know where to go. But I won’t tell you yet. Early.

      Also refrain from too bold forecasts, although some assumptions exist smile hi
  • edmed
    edmed 29 June 2020 15: 51 New
    -6
    Quote: unaha
    Neither right, nor left, nor bounce in the end?

    "Step left or right, escape, jump in place, provocation! I shoot without warning!" wink Something like this..
  • mdsr
    mdsr 29 June 2020 15: 32 New
    31
    Quote: Alex777
    Remember how fun they lived under Yeltsin. Especially senior citizens.

    But now how smartly life is for pensionersfellow Men in retirement age 65, women in retirement age 60, and an average pension of 13 thousand are a dream, not life. Yeltsin can envy.
    I want to remind the screaders of March 2018. Then, before the election, you also arranged a Sabbath at the VO, breaking the vocal cords, that now he will clean all the cows from the government, organize a breakthrough, etc. .. But only a few weeks have passed and you all became somewhat depressed after the appointment of the cabinet. And then, when he dragged the pension robbery of citizens during the World Cup, you did not know what to say, who to blame. And then there was also an increase in VAT to 20%.
    So, you should know that after the current vote to nullify the significance of the constitution, no less amazing "gifts" await you. You have to pay for everything in life, especially for naivety and stupidity.
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 29 June 2020 15: 43 New
      -17
      Putin is not purging anyone, but trying to maintain unity as much as possible.
      Sometimes even where, in my opinion, it would be necessary to use power more actively.
      My parents in Yeltsin’s time would die of hunger if it weren’t for me.
      And this is not an exaggeration. They didn’t live in Moscow and did not even receive a regional minuscule for many months. Not to mention the increase.
      What will happen - let's see, we won’t go anywhere.
      I already voted for Prokhorov once.
      I do not want to repeat such mistakes. hi
      1. NordUral
        NordUral 29 June 2020 19: 32 New
        +1
        Putin is not purging anyone, but trying to maintain unity as much as possible.

        I agree, but with clarification - in the ruling community of thieves and bribe takers. And this I have correctly said.
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 29 June 2020 22: 35 New
          0
          Your story of Germans resettled in the Urals, but I have already heard Stalin revered. I have enough. hi
        2. NordUral
          NordUral 30 June 2020 10: 02 New
          -1
          So plug your ears and squint. I’m not imposing my point of view and my experience on you, Alex777.
          And I’ll also say that the Russian half of my ancestors also sat in the same Northern Urals. And she also did not harbor evil against Stalin, like the mold of the sixties, thawed by Khrushch.
          You don’t have to blame everything on Stalin, there were enough executioners, the same Nikita was head over heels in blood.
        3. Alex777
          Alex777 30 June 2020 10: 25 New
          -3
          Stalinist repression cost Russia 10 million lives.
          Every time when you will compare someone with him, or bring him to someone as an example, do not forget about it, please. hi
        4. NordUral
          NordUral 30 June 2020 10: 27 New
          -1
          You were mistaken, your teacher, Solzhenitsyn, lied. which is 100.
        5. Alex777
          Alex777 30 June 2020 10: 40 New
          -2
          I’m not just not a student of Solzhenitsyn, I didn’t even read what he wrote.
          But unlike you, I know how to correctly spell his last name.
          The numbers that I remembered while studying history are sad.
          In the Civil War, Russia lost about 10 million lives.
          In the Stalinist repression died as much.
          The country approached the war having lost a great number of compatriots capable of labor and defense.
          For me it is too high a price for a "bright future".
          Therefore, personally to me, revolutions are no longer needed.
          I do not impose my opinion on you. And there’s nothing to argue about.
          All the best. hi
        6. NordUral
          NordUral 30 June 2020 10: 45 New
          -1
          Therefore, personally to me, revolutions are no longer needed.

          I will not argue with you, this is empty.
          And as for the call for revolution - this is where you saw in my statements? I constantly urge you to remove these from power by peaceful and legal means - in elections.
        7. Alex777
          Alex777 30 June 2020 10: 57 New
          0
          Here I am - for a peaceful and legal path and against the dictatorship of the minority.
          Whatever the minority.
        8. NordUral
          NordUral 30 June 2020 11: 30 New
          0
          I agree, Alexander!
    2. Nemchinov Vl
      Nemchinov Vl 30 June 2020 21: 38 New
      0
      Quote: Alex777
      .... For me it is too high a price for a "bright future".
      but this is on the one hand, and on the other, futurecould come and not so bright (!). Hypothetically, if you enter the era of rebirth of a country with 10000000 "dissidents"who are ready to hit you in the back (!).... Simply think about it (!). And also remember What never (!), neither before nor after the death of Stalin, our country, no longer developed EXACTLY THESE RATES (!!!). So, this historical person is a question always controversial and controversial !!!.
  • 4ekist
    4ekist 29 June 2020 16: 52 New
    -11
    Why don't you like the retirement age of 65? It took a long time to get there. Do all "conscientious" citizens in our country pay money to the pension fund and insurance medicine? half of the country does not pay (underpay, harbor income) taxes. The exception should be children, the elderly and the disabled, and at the same time they want to receive good pensions and attend polyclinics and hospitals. Why the hell should I sponsor the concealers, working all my life for the "white" and donating money to various funds, incl. and charities. So, what they went to, they came to that.
    1. tovarich-andrey.62goncharov
      tovarich-andrey.62goncharov 29 June 2020 20: 02 New
      -3
      Have you tried to pay all taxes with a real salary?
  • NordUral
    NordUral 29 June 2020 19: 30 New
    0
    So, you should know that after the current vote to nullify the significance of the constitution, no less amazing "gifts" await you. You have to pay for everything in life, especially for naivety and stupidity.
    I agree one hundred percent!
  • Malyuta
    Malyuta 29 June 2020 15: 34 New
    +6
    Quote: Alex777
    Remember how fun they lived under Yeltsin. Especially senior citizens.


    What are the 90s fixes, you look at the 21st century in the yard in the calendar, and everything in your 90s bugs.
    already change manuals.
    1. unaha
      unaha 29 June 2020 15: 45 New
      -5
      What for? The Russian empire has long ceased to exist, and one head of the state is still looking back, while the other seems to have closed eyes - what if there’s something terrible ahead.
    2. Boris55
      Boris55 29 June 2020 16: 02 New
      -13
      Quote: Malyuta
      What are the 90s fixes, you look at the 21st century in the yard in the calendar, and everything in your 90s bugs. already change manuals.

      What has changed since then? The still valid Constitution of 1993 brought the country almost to the collapse and internecine wars of the newly-made princes.

      A return to those times is quite real. The only guarantee against this is to rewrite the Constitution in the interests of Russia.

      What guarantees do you have that this cannot happen?
      1. Malyuta
        Malyuta 29 June 2020 16: 11 New
        +8
        Quote: Boris55
        A return to those times is quite real. The only guarantee against this is to rewrite the Constitution in the interests of Russia.

        Enough already to carry this bend, here not all silly children.
        From the 1st of July everything will rise in price, utilities, real estate taxes, etc., what will you sing after "legitimization2 is reset?"
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 29 June 2020 16: 13 New
          -7
          I repeat the question: What guarantees do you have that there will be no return to the 90s if the Constitution remains the same?
        2. Souchastnik
          Souchastnik 29 June 2020 17: 19 New
          11
          What guarantees do you have that there will be no return to the 90s ......

          If there will be a return in 90, it is not because the constitution is old, but because it is so wanted by those in power. The constitution does not change brains.
        3. flicker
          flicker 29 June 2020 21: 48 New
          +3
          The constitution does not change brains.
          It may or may not change the brain, but it can completely change its brain functions, even if it pushes them into the framework of norms and laws, the latter provide new conditions that force us to look for new moves to solve (even old ones) tasks.
          ---
          So do not underestimate the significance of constitutional changes.
        4. Souchastnik
          Souchastnik 30 June 2020 09: 33 New
          +1
          So do not underestimate the significance of constitutional changes.

          Well, if you think that as soon as we change the constitution, we will immediately heal, I will not argue with you.
          Unfortunately, I see no reason for optimism. There is a good joke about a brothel. There, when sales fell, they didn’t make beds for Feng Shui, but they changed staff.
        5. flicker
          flicker 30 June 2020 10: 47 New
          0
          There is a good joke about a brothel. There, when sales fell, they didn’t make beds for Feng Shui, but they changed staff.
          This anecdote is apparently about Ukraine, where the "girls" are often changed, though this does not save them, but on the contrary - drowns them.

          This is because, as they had a brothel, they stayed (although they change "girls")
          Maybe it was worth replacing the furniture, so as not for a brothel?
          Then, you see, and the girl would have chosen the right one (not for a brothel).
  • ZAV69
    ZAV69 29 June 2020 16: 54 New
    +7
    Quote: Malyuta
    From the 1st of July everything will rise in price, utilities, real estate taxes, etc., what will you sing after "legitimization2 is reset?"

    So it seems like every year at this time everything rises in price. Communal for sure. What did you not sing before?
    And there were no amendments; did it not rise in price or became cheaper?
  • Alex777
    Alex777 29 June 2020 17: 36 New
    -9
    From July 1, everything will rise in price, utilities, property taxes, etc.

    Is that inner voice told you? Or read where?
    And what will happen if nothing rises in price?
    Eat a tie? lol
  • IS-80_RVGK2
    IS-80_RVGK2 30 June 2020 00: 46 New
    -2
    But nothing that the country fell apart a little earlier? Or is it not worth paying attention to such trifles?
  • Alex777
    Alex777 29 June 2020 16: 43 New
    -3
    what are the 90s fixes, you look at the 21st century on the calendar in the yard

    What brought the 21st century to the yard?
    White lives don't matter?
    LGBTI month of pride? Oh well. lol
  • Grandfather
    Grandfather 29 June 2020 16: 45 New
    +7
    Quote: Alex777
    Remember how fun they lived under Yeltsin. Especially senior citizens.

    and at Kerensky as ....
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 29 June 2020 17: 06 New
      -2
      I'm not so old. You know better about Kerensky. wink
  • gurzuf
    gurzuf 29 June 2020 15: 57 New
    -3
    "And those who are against just in the overwhelming majority will not come at all." In short - terpily in life.
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 29 June 2020 17: 28 New
      +7
      Appeared data at voting on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation
    2. unaha
      unaha 30 June 2020 11: 27 New
      0
      Not at all. They simply do not believe in the honest conduct of the voting organizers. There are enough reasons for this opinion.
  • bk316
    bk316 29 June 2020 17: 50 New
    -4
    and yes - I do not have the slightest confidence in this "survey"

    Yes, your trust does not need anyone laughing
    1. unaha
      unaha 30 June 2020 11: 30 New
      0
      Nobody really needs my private trust in our reality. However, this is just very bad. The finale of states to which the trust of citizens is not interesting is very predictable.
  • tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 29 June 2020 15: 28 New
    +4
    Quote: Lesovik
    And what prevents those who are "against" from coming earlier? Not 1st, but 29th or 30th? Or will they go in an organized way? Under strict guidance and vigilant supervision?

    Yesterday my neighbor went to the consulate to vote for the amendments, I asked him "Have you even read them?" and he told me "Why, I went and voted for, I'm a citizen of Russia."
    1. bk316
      bk316 29 June 2020 17: 44 New
      -2
      "Why, I went and voted for, I'm a citizen of Russia."

      Yeah, the wrong neighbor.
      Well, in VO there are a lot of people who, too, without reading the amendments, WILL NOT go to vote, does this bother you?
      Right above your comment, one such posted a placard "how can those who have taken their pension write a good constitution." Probably reading the amendments is backbreaking work for him.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 29 June 2020 17: 51 New
        +3
        Quote: bk316
        Well, in VO there are a lot of people who, too, without reading the amendments, WILL NOT go to vote, does this bother you?

        I do not mind, people are different. Although even now the grandmothers in the villages say "The main thing is that there is no war."
        1. bk316
          bk316 29 June 2020 17: 52 New
          +2
          Although even now the grandmothers in the villages say "The main thing is that there is no war."

          And maybe they are right!
          But to vote or not to vote for the law without reading it is not out of a big mind.
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 29 June 2020 17: 53 New
        +1
        Quote: bk316
        Probably read the amendments for him overwork.

        By the way, his pension does not bother him.
      3. NordUral
        NordUral 30 June 2020 17: 41 New
        0
        But to read all the amendments and it makes no sense. To argue that white is white - for this, an amendment to the constitution is not needed (for me - it needs to be changed completely). Read and comprehend only a few.
  • gurzuf
    gurzuf 29 June 2020 15: 55 New
    +1
    Internal vote pro votes
  • NordUral
    NordUral 29 June 2020 19: 29 New
    -1
    On the 1st, real voters will go, and not these virtual ones, most of whom are selected from constantly non-voters.
    1. Tank hard
      Tank hard 29 June 2020 19: 37 New
      +3
      Quote: NordUral
      On the 1st, real voters will go, and not these virtual ones, most of whom are selected from constantly non-voters.

      My mother has already voted, she is quite real. repeat
      1. NordUral
        NordUral 29 June 2020 19: 51 New
        0
        I wrote that not all are fake, von Messer.
  • Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 29 June 2020 14: 59 New
    +6
    Quote: Svarog
    I thought 72% would support, but here 76% .. mdya .. well, on the whole I didn’t make a lot of mistakes, everything is predictable ... and sad.

    Well, initially the numbers were called in the range of 70-80%, so it is not surprising, especially with the voting system itself - without observers, for a week, on stumps of luggage carriers, etc.
    1. gurzuf
      gurzuf 29 June 2020 16: 03 New
      -4
      They forgot another phrase on your training manual - they have already voted for you.
  • tracer
    tracer 30 June 2020 19: 00 New
    -1
    Go to the monastery of Svarog with grief. Make a tent for yourself an icon of Lenin and Marx with Engels and go and have fun reading the first transcripts of congresses of the CPSU. But
    , something tells me that out of habit, you will brainwash people with your nonsense.
  • lis-ik
    lis-ik 29 June 2020 17: 26 New
    0
    Quote: Looking Petrovich
    Quote: Sergey 777
    The statistics service claims that 76 percent of those who voted in favor of amendments to the Basic Law.

    Uh ... strange to say the least.

    76% of them are so customary to draw. Edro in the Duma also has 76% of the seats, although no one votes for it.

    Yes, they are already fixated on this figure. They can’t come up with anything new. I, here in the comments about two months ago, predicted this figure to the nearest percentage.
    1. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 29 June 2020 20: 25 New
      +1
      Quote: lis-ik
      Yes, they are already fixated on this figure. They can’t come up with anything new. I, here in the comments about two months ago, predicted this figure to the nearest percentage.

      Shevchenko posted the video today, why exactly 76%, and his forecast is 76 + -2% (watch from 5 minutes)
  • alone
    alone 29 June 2020 17: 57 New
    +2
    Quote: Looking Petrovich
    76% of them are so customary to draw. Edro in the Duma also has 76% of the seats, although no one votes for it.

    They have a 76 sacred number wassat wassat
  • NDR-791
    NDR-791 29 June 2020 14: 22 New
    13
    Uh ... strange to say the least.
    This figure was announced back in March. Do you doubt that there will be less? Don’t worry, people, the CEC said ... we expect around 76%. So be it belay
  • rocket757
    rocket757 29 June 2020 14: 23 New
    -5
    It will be strange if you do not type FOR more than everything else.
    1. Sergei 777
      Sergei 777 29 June 2020 14: 25 New
      0
      It is not strange, it is impossible angry
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 29 June 2020 14: 28 New
        -4
        Surely it is.
      2. mdsr
        mdsr 29 June 2020 14: 38 New
        -6
        Quote: Sergey 777
        It is not strange, it is impossible angry

        Well, why? Indeed, in North Korea they vote 100% FOR. And in different countries of Africa, not much less happens. Are we worse than all Ethiopia, Kenya and Rwanda? Sarcasm.
        Seriously, such an abuse of the Constitution for the sake of nullifying common sense will be heard back to our grandchildren and great-grandchildren. Faithful, go straight to
        1. gurzuf
          gurzuf 29 June 2020 16: 07 New
          +2
          Well, why? In Crimea, in 2014, 93% of the voters voted for "FOR". Also confuses you?
        2. 4ekist
          4ekist 29 June 2020 17: 01 New
          -3
          There is nothing to do with your strategic thinking on the sofa, but the 1993 constitution. buy at a bookstore and keep it as a keepsake.
    2. fa2998
      fa2998 29 June 2020 14: 58 New
      -1
      There are proven and loyal people there. For them, any election company is an extra reason to show their trustworthiness, then promotion, awards, to whom orders and medals. Well, and the old sweet life.
  • carstorm 11
    carstorm 11 29 June 2020 14: 27 New
    +4
    these are exit polls. it is strange that this fact was omitted since VTsIOM said it in plain text.
    1. Vladimir Mashkov
      Vladimir Mashkov 29 June 2020 14: 44 New
      +2
      The lack of mention in the article that PRELIMINARY data are data of anonymous exit polls is provocative. What immediately began to condemn all the "honest"!
      1. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 29 June 2020 15: 25 New
        +3
        exactly. you can’t say otherwise
      2. ZAV69
        ZAV69 29 June 2020 16: 57 New
        +1
        data are data from anonymous exit polls

        Are you reading through a line? It was said there. This time. VTsIOM is not a CEC; in principle, it cannot have other data until the CEC officially provides them
        1. Vladimir Mashkov
          Vladimir Mashkov 29 June 2020 17: 22 New
          0
          Mr. Zhukov, we are both wrong and right. The article does NOT specify that exit poll data are PRELIMINARY and NOT counted: ballots without counting are packed and sealed before July 1. And the fact that these data of the authorities and the Central Election Commission, and not VTsIOM, are asserted by your alternative "honest" people of the same opinion: read the comments thoroughly!
        2. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 29 June 2020 23: 21 New
          0
          not in this case. for some time there was another text in the article and exit polls were not mentioned at all. they just said that VTsIOM gave interest on the vote and that’s it. and then they fixed it)
    2. New Year day
      New Year day 29 June 2020 22: 59 New
      0
      Quote: carstorm 11
      these are exit polls

      What are exit polls for free casting of ballots drawn on my knee? laughing But seriously, these floors are prohibited this time laughing for some reason request
      1. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 29 June 2020 23: 19 New
        +1
        for sure. probably for this reason they interviewed more than 160 thousand people. because banned
        1. New Year day
          New Year day 29 June 2020 23: 47 New
          -1
          Quote: carstorm 11
          full time. probably for this reason they interviewed more than 160 thousand people. because banned

          you trust the scribblers more! Some said that early voting gave 90% against and only 10% for. These write - on the contrary. And everything is very confidential. There is no truth now
          1. carstorm 11
            carstorm 11 30 June 2020 09: 44 New
            -1
            What does the scribble? this is VTsIOM data. who are hired for these purposes. conduct surveys.
  • purple
    purple 29 June 2020 14: 31 New
    -2
    Quote: Sergey 777
    Uh ... strange to say the least.

    Why? The people simply expressed their opinion ... but the "chosen ones" survived and the people are nothing to you.
    The turnout and the results are honest, all in the case. You on the Internet of bold hamsters a small fraction
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 29 June 2020 16: 49 New
      -1
      Quote: purple
      The turnout and the results are honest, all in the case.

      the policy of zeroed to you is apparently to your liking, then at the trough. that's all.
      1. bk316
        bk316 29 June 2020 17: 56 New
        +3
        then at the trough

        Judge by yourself? Or hope to break into her coveted?
  • evgenii67
    evgenii67 29 June 2020 14: 46 New
    +7
    Quote: Sergey 777
    Uh ... strange to say the least.

    It is very SOFT to say. Do you still think that in Russia there are fair elections and, all the more, a fair vote? Have you noticed that very often over 76% come out? Just a coincidence ?!
    I work now at the factory
    1. Nasrat
      Nasrat 29 June 2020 14: 59 New
      -8
      Quote: evgenii67
      ..
      I work now at the factory

      I apologize for getting into your conversation ... At which factory are you allowed to chat? Can you name the company? (as a social survey)
      1. evgenii67
        evgenii67 29 June 2020 15: 09 New
        +7
        Quote: Nasr
        I apologize for getting into your conversation ... At which factory are you allowed to chat? Can you name the company? (as a social survey)

        I have a legal weekend now if that. And what does this have to do with the case?
        1. Nasrat
          Nasrat 29 June 2020 15: 17 New
          -8
          Legitimate weekend .... wow .... Write that you are working NOW at the factory and immediately we are writing NOW a legal weekend .... funny! It was not possible to formulate correctly, but there are complaints about the course and procedure of voting-ss !!! wassat
          So at what enterprise do you earn corn?
          1. evgenii67
            evgenii67 30 June 2020 05: 11 New
            0
            Quote: Nasr
            Legitimate weekend .... wow .... Write that you are working NOW at the factory and immediately we are writing NOW a legal weekend .... funny! It was not possible to formulate correctly, but there are complaints about the course and procedure of voting-ss !!!
            So at what enterprise do you earn corn?

            You specifically write what kind of OAO and position ??? I meant that today I work there, by the way, I’m going out a day soon, I’m drinking coffee. I wrote it like this (now) because relatively recently (less than a year ago) I worked in a budget organization and there I remember they drove us to the polls and even remember how they drove us to a rally. Tell what the rally was?
      2. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 29 June 2020 15: 35 New
        10
        Quote: Nasr
        Which factory is allowed to chat? Can you name the company? (as a social survey)

        Can you give the account number in the bank where the money is, give the right to a survey?
    2. DVR
      DVR 29 June 2020 15: 04 New
      -2
      Do you still think that in Russia there are fair elections and, all the more, a fair vote? Have you noticed that very often over 76% come out? Just a coincidence ?!

      By your logic (and your one-minded people), the power with all the resources is so dumb that it cannot draw different numbers each time, well, so that there are less suspicions?
    3. bk316
      bk316 30 June 2020 11: 29 New
      0
      Just a coincidence ?!

      Coincidence, only you confuse cause and effect. laughing
      Excuse me, who do you work in the factory?
      Is it me to try to explain or to no avail?
  • evgenii67
    evgenii67 29 June 2020 14: 57 New
    +1
    Quote: Sergey 777
    Uh ... strange to say the least.

    It is very SOFT to say. Have you noticed that they always have more than 70% for? Do you still believe in fair elections and honest calculations ??? I am now working at a factory at a private trader, so we got a vote right at the factory, the turnout should be 100%, at least they didn’t hint how to vote, and this is a private trader, I'm not talking about public sector employees. There you have the freedom of choice.
    1. 4ekist
      4ekist 29 June 2020 22: 01 New
      +3
      Everything is simple in the ballot: two boxes, "Yes" and "No". No one stands behind with a club and does not control. So don't La-La.
      1. evgenii67
        evgenii67 30 June 2020 04: 54 New
        -1
        Quote: 4ekist
        Everything is simple in the ballot: two boxes, "Yes" and "No". No one stands behind with a club and does not control. So don't La-La.

        Nobody's worth it - that's right! Should I stand? Indeed, in this performance, the main presence (turnout), and the turnout will be what it "should" be, and where you put a tick there is no longer important, their "72-76%" will always draw. At the expense of state employees and such "private traders" who organize elections at their enterprises, so as not to go far, but it is convenient, but they do not leave a choice either, the turnout at these enterprises should be 100%. Of all my friends and relatives, practically no one voted FOR, or did not go at all, even my father, who always voted for the GDP, but after his "wonderful" reforms, in particular the increase in the retirement age, Dad vowed in the spring not to support the GDP anymore and vote for him, to which I answered him "but no more"
        1. 4ekist
          4ekist 30 June 2020 14: 58 New
          0
          GDP has its own bends. But I voted. I do not see any real alternative candidates except S. Lavrov. And as for retirement age, I’ll say this: We don’t pay half the country in full to a pension fund (I mean hiding income + squandering pension money + unfair distribution between ordinary mortals and state officials of the highest rank, these are judges, deputies and crooks.) Many citizens they worked for themselves all their lives (why bend their backs on the state). And only closer to old age they think - what kind of pension will they receive? Although they also have an old-age pension. And I have quite a few such acquaintances. There are still survivor pensions, disability pensions, etc. There is not enough money for everyone. Of course, you need to put things in order. And 65 years of retirement is certainly not fair. Many die before this age, that is, all his pension savings disappear.
    2. ZAV69
      ZAV69 30 June 2020 07: 34 New
      +3
      I work in Rostelecom. In addition to the email newsletter that the vote will take place, the authorities did not show themselves in this matter.
      1. bk316
        bk316 30 June 2020 11: 31 New
        0
        the authorities did not show themselves in this matter.

        And we recommended that if you participate, then online.
  • Vend
    Vend 29 June 2020 15: 32 New
    -6
    Quote: Sergey 777
    The statistics service claims that 76 percent of those who voted in favor of amendments to the Basic Law.

    Uh ... strange to say the least.
    and this is to irritate the liberals and other shellup laughing laughing they already have a tantrum laughing laughing
  • Vladislav_2
    Vladislav_2 29 June 2020 19: 00 New
    -2
    rumor has it that they go to vote twice! (rumors are understandable) now and rumors sometimes reach 90% of reality. and so I think that for us it has long been decided and voted yes .... it remains only to see the result wink..... and a little go nuts from him
    1. Normal ok
      Normal ok 29 June 2020 22: 34 New
      -2
      Quote: Vladislav_2
      rumor has it that they go to vote twice! (rumors are understandable) now and rumors sometimes reach 90% of reality. and so I think that for us it has long been decided and voted yes .... it remains only to see the result wink..... and a little go nuts from him

      This is not a rumor. The journalist Pavel Lobkov voted freely two times for the sake of experiment. Now they are making him an article "for discrediting ..." So anything is possible.
      1. ZAV69
        ZAV69 30 June 2020 07: 38 New
        +3
        Quote: Normal ok
        This is not a rumor. The journalist Pavel Lobkov voted freely two times for the sake of experiment. Now they are making him an article "for discrediting ..." So anything is possible.

        Not for the sake of experiment, but for the sake of provocation. Active members of Parnassus worked there, they gave him a bill. After the pubis, we tried several more journalists - the result is zero.
  • smart ass
    smart ass 30 June 2020 21: 25 New
    0
    Herd it and herd in africa
  • Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 29 June 2020 14: 18 New
    +1
    It is very convenient to use electronic voting. Fast and not burdensome. It remains to wait a bit for the result ...
  • Woodman
    Woodman 29 June 2020 14: 20 New
    +8
    Over the past five days, voter turnout was more than 28 percent.
    I’m probably leaving today.
    1. Sergey39
      Sergey39 29 June 2020 14: 40 New
      0
      We go home. Already come several times.
      1. DVR
        DVR 29 June 2020 14: 47 New
        -3
        We go home. Already come several times.

        Maybe they go somewhere, but none of the acquaintances knows about this. I would like to have a look at me ... I’ll have to go vote for the amendments myself, which I will certainly do in the near future.
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 29 June 2020 15: 26 New
          -1
          and how should they learn about your desire? didn’t try just to familiarize yourself with the procedure for a start? In order to notify about the desire to vote at home, a citizen can: apply in person or by phone to his precinct commission, agree on the date and time of voting at home (contact details of his commission can be found through the service for searching a polling station)
          1. DVR
            DVR 29 June 2020 16: 06 New
            +2
            and how should they learn about your desire? didn’t try just to familiarize yourself with the procedure for a start? In order to notify about the desire to vote at home, a citizen can: apply in person or by phone to his precinct commission, agree on the date and time of voting at home (contact details of his commission can be found through the service for searching a polling station)

            Thanks for the info, Dmitry. Here they write about people walking around the apartments. And writing exclusively from opponents of the amendments. Really everyone who writes about walking really notified district commissions about the desire to vote at home ?? Apparently, they’re not saying anything ... But nobody walks with us at all, although I live in an area with high density.
            1. carstorm 11
              carstorm 11 29 June 2020 16: 09 New
              0
              not really. we have places small towns or settlements. they can go there. I'm in a pretty big city right now. we didn’t go. my mother didn’t come to another area. the mother-in-law, too. although here I distort for my mother-in-law with my mother live kapets as near)))
            2. 4ekist
              4ekist 29 June 2020 17: 09 New
              -3
              Nobody goes home! This is a lie or provocation. We have in the district not even put up ads. I had to find out the number of the polling station and its address via the Internet. At the entrance to the polling station, he also says nothing about the elections.
            3. Sergey39
              Sergey39 29 June 2020 21: 45 New
              0
              Quote: DVR
              everyone who writes about the walkers really notified the precinct commissions of the desire to vote at home

              Nobody notified us. Sami came. The first day they stood in the courtyard to the microdistrict, then they passed through the apartments. My acquaintances, too. Mother voted at home, accidentally caught. This is in Kaliningrad, in other regions I do not know.
      2. Pereira
        Pereira 29 June 2020 14: 50 New
        +1
        Apparently they do not reach the planned indicators for the turnout. Behind the schedule.
        1. Malyuta
          Malyuta 29 June 2020 14: 52 New
          -1
          Quote: Pereira
          Apparently they do not reach the planned indicators for the turnout. Behind the schedule.

          Stretch the "trunk" "on the" stump "and reset the zero itself.
        2. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 29 June 2020 15: 28 New
          -3
          Do not bring nonsense to her God. they come only to those who asked for it. and only so.
          1. Malyuta
            Malyuta 29 June 2020 15: 31 New
            +1
            Quote: carstorm 11
            Do not bring nonsense to her God. they come only to those who asked for it. and only so.

            You are talking nonsense! Yesterday I witnessed that everyone went around at home !!!
            1. carstorm 11
              carstorm 11 29 June 2020 15: 32 New
              +3
              and what surprised you in this?) people in different houses imagine you could leave applications) did someone come to you specifically?)))
              1. Malyuta
                Malyuta 29 June 2020 15: 42 New
                0
                Quote: carstorm 11
                and what surprised you in this?) people in different houses imagine you could leave applications) did someone come to you specifically?)))

                Yesterday I was at my mother-in-law in a small town, she was visited 2 times at 17 and 19 hours, although she was at work (day / three) and voted at work under duress of the bosses under the threat of deprivation of bonuses. I personally brought her passport! From a conversation with the "linemen": "we are forced to use personal transport and are paid for it," but how many did not say is the greatest secret.
                1. carstorm 11
                  carstorm 11 29 June 2020 15: 50 New
                  -1
                  it is now clear. this is possible in small and remote towns. He specified that voting in local community areas is provided for remote areas of settlements with poor transport links and is organized on the initiative of heads of administrations.

                  “The head of the settlement appeals to us, prescribes the streets, which, in his opinion, are at a sufficient distance, and we, in turn, having received this initiative, apply to the election commission of the Krasnodar Territory so that it agrees for us to conduct such an off-site voting.
                  1. Malyuta
                    Malyuta 29 June 2020 16: 13 New
                    -1
                    Quote: carstorm 11
                    Krasnodar Territory, so that she agreed to us to conduct such an exit vote. as an example

                    Tsapki is also from the Krasnodar Territory.
                    1. carstorm 11
                      carstorm 11 29 June 2020 16: 18 New
                      +2
                      Lord, what does it have to do with ...
                      1. Malyuta
                        Malyuta 29 June 2020 16: 19 New
                        -5
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        Oops, it has nothing to do with it ...

                        And this is Putinism!
                      2. carstorm 11
                        carstorm 11 29 June 2020 16: 21 New
                        +5
                        Well, of course. Jump from topic to topic. sharply translate to another silly remarks what is it called? Hats lived in the Krasnodar Territory. excellent analogy and most importantly in essence. Bravo! applaud standing)
                      3. Malyuta
                        Malyuta 29 June 2020 22: 02 New
                        -2
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        Well, of course. Jump from topic to topic. sharply translate to another silly remarks what is it called? Hats lived in the Krasnodar Territory. excellent analogy and most importantly in essence. Bravo! applaud standing)

                        Yeah, the hoes weren’t in the 90s, but under Putinism and were associated with the voracious gulls.
                        Enough to make candy out of shit already, there is ebnoputinism, and a candy wrapper from this shit is absolutely not important. hi
                      4. carstorm 11
                        carstorm 11 29 June 2020 23: 24 New
                        +3
                        are you listening to yourself WHAT DOES THE HATCHES HAVE AT ALL? we talked about something else altogether. you sang a song about the Hats for no reason. it’s even hard to call nonsense. this is beyond understanding in principle. I have a wife who doesn’t do anything like translating a theme like that.
                  2. DVR
                    DVR 29 June 2020 16: 54 New
                    +4
                    And this is Putinism!

                    Yeah, but chikatilo, according to your logic - Brezhnevism? You better remember Yeltsinism, there are much more examples of this.
          2. Nemchinov Vl
            Nemchinov Vl 30 June 2020 22: 10 New
            +3
            Quote: Malyuta
            Yesterday I was with my mother-in-law
            ....
            Quote: Malyuta
            although she was at work (day / three)
            А you are really prudent sir !!!
      3. Anatole Klim
        Anatole Klim 29 June 2020 16: 39 New
        +7
        Quote: Malyuta
        Yesterday I witnessed that everyone went around at home !!!

        I don’t know why you have been instructed in cons, I’m telling you the truth. Yesterday, Sunday, the doorbell rings, I open, there is a girl - we invite you to a vote, the car brought a commission to your house, go out and vote please. To be honest, I didn’t want to, but then I went. Gazelle is standing in front of the entrance, three folding tables were pulled out, on the first they give a mask, gloves and a pen, near the second you show the passport in your hands, sign and give the ballot, on the third you put a tick and throw the ballot in the ballot box. Mom is 82 years old, walks poorly, and she didn’t go, and then she called again today, they came home and asked her to vote at home for a long time, they didn’t submit any applications. That's it yes
        1. flicker
          flicker 29 June 2020 22: 14 New
          +1
          That's it
          And what's wrong with that?
          Invite a person to vote request so thank you have to say
      4. 4ekist
        4ekist 29 June 2020 17: 11 New
        -6
        You probably have 4 houses in your village?
      5. Nemchinov Vl
        Nemchinov Vl 30 June 2020 22: 08 New
        -1
        Quote: Malyuta
        You are talking nonsense! Yesterday I witnessed that everyone went around at home !!!
        .... not fighters battalion "Azov" (!).... they collect a collection of signatures "against" amendments, so that through international courts in The Hague and Stockholm, they could a couple of more times, on the claims of UkrNaftoGaz, bend Gazprom, and you all paid for it (!). And if you don’t want to vote against, they’ll bring you scary argument about what amendments - they are for the sake of "zeroing" (!!!).
    2. realdiamond
      realdiamond 29 June 2020 16: 49 New
      +1
      For days they called the intercom: "Volunteer Takoytov, will you vote?" - No, I won't (I didn't want to get involved). I did not leave any applications.
    3. DymOk_v_dYmke
      DymOk_v_dYmke 29 June 2020 18: 50 New
      +3
      Quote: carstorm 11
      Do not bring nonsense to her God. they come only to those who asked for it. and only so.

      Sorry, this is complete nonsense.
      We can only state what you see.
      In the villages go with transparent boxing, accompanied by a policeman and offer (but do not force) to vote.
      I report as a witness to such actions.
      1. carstorm 11
        carstorm 11 29 June 2020 19: 14 New
        0
        I clarified this fact below. on the initiative of local authorities, remote and small settlements can do so. it’s just that a person did not initially clarify this fact in his story about going home. when clarified, I agreed with this.
  • Tank hard
    Tank hard 29 June 2020 19: 40 New
    +2
    Quote: Sergey39
    We go home. Already come several times.

    Nobody goes home with us. request
  • codetalker
    codetalker 29 June 2020 16: 07 New
    +4
    Some kind of article is very strange. It took 4 days of voting, not 5. And the turnout (according to the CEC) was 37%.
  • KSVK
    KSVK 29 June 2020 14: 21 New
    +1
    Who would have doubted. The turnout turns out to be even higher, and the percentage "for" fits into the announced forecast.
  • rocket757
    rocket757 29 June 2020 14: 21 New
    +2
    Boom to wait for the outcome.
    I am exactly corrected by the amendments themselves, but how people react to this is interesting.
    1. antivirus
      antivirus 29 June 2020 14: 48 New
      -3
      Now this is an aggressively obedient majority for you, and 80-90 years ago there was a "conservative-post-serfdom overwhelming majority." Mandelstams and Wrangels had enough grief. What is needed by the dullness (85% in the Ros empire) suddenly became the law. WHO WAS ANYTHING, THAT WILL BECOME EVERYTHING.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 29 June 2020 15: 02 New
        +1
        Quote: antivirus
        Now it’s for you an aggressively obedient majority,

        It doesn't look like ... aggressively minded, it's usually some kind of action, but here ... indifferently - a static state of the "organism", which is not so good and not so bad ... it is better to be afraid, because sho fears that it will just get worse.
        1. Malyuta
          Malyuta 29 June 2020 15: 07 New
          +5
          Quote: rocket757
          which is not so good Schaub and not so bad Schaub ... worse, he really does not want to, but he is afraid of wanting better, because he is afraid that it will become worse.

          The bosses forced the mother-in-law to vote, she voted against, now she curses Putin with obscene words.
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 29 June 2020 15: 11 New
            +3
            Miscellaneous happens ... small-town attempts were, are and always will be. Perhaps the big boss will notice and note the works of an active, his, reliable frame.
            Everything as usual.
            1. DymOk_v_dYmke
              DymOk_v_dYmke 29 June 2020 19: 10 New
              0
              Quote: rocket757
              Miscellaneous happens ... small-town attempts were, are and always will be.

              The chairman of the election commission won an apartment in the constitutional lottery, and several citizens tickets to the Gulag Museum

              The first of five apartments in Omsk for those voting for the eternal rule of Vladimir Putin was accidentally won by the chairman of the precinct election commission, Anna Ganeva. Among the remaining prizes are five cars. In Moscow, about 400 thousand (out of a million) awarded prizes evoke different emotions. Some are happy to have won coupons for the purchase of groceries in the Azbuka Vkusa stores. Others swear quietly, not knowing who to float free tickets to the museum of the history of the Gulag.
              [2020-06-27]

              http://www.apn-spb.ru/news/article32051.htm
              and https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4396460
              1. Freeman
                Freeman 29 June 2020 19: 47 New
                0
                SmokeOk_v_dYmke (Alexander) Today, 19:10

                This is how "fakes" are cooked up.
                First - The link is "broken" because the news may have already been deleted.
                Secondly, the news about winning the apartment of the head of the election committee from Omsk, which was posted on their news sites by publications claiming to be "solid", not "yellow", attributed a "fake" about "winning free tickets to the museum of the history of the GULAG."
                Explaining - In case of winning, "virtual rubles" are accrued, which can be exchanged for a "promo code" giving a discount for purchases in various stores and pharmacies. Visits to cafes, restaurants and museums.
                The choice of what to exchange his "points" for is made by the winner.

                Scan of part of the portal page with a list of rewards, divided by category.


                This is just one line from the "All" section. And so. choose what you like from the section of interest.
                I repeat - the choice is made by the "winner", and not a kind of "lottery drum", as in the "money and clothing lottery" of the times of the USSR.
                No one forces you to go to the Gulag History Museum.
                And as a "win" - it does not impose.
                1. Mordvin 3
                  Mordvin 3 29 June 2020 22: 15 New
                  0
                  Quote: Freeman
                  This is just one line from the "All" section. And so. choose what you like from the section of interest.

                  And who is the sponsor of this charity?
                  1. Freeman
                    Freeman 29 June 2020 22: 36 New
                    +2
                    Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) Today, 22: 15
                    And who is the sponsor of this charity?

                    I assume that the sponsor is the Moscow budget, since the cookies are distributed through the Active Citizen website. And this site is a project of the Moscow mayor's office.
                    1. Mordvin 3
                      Mordvin 3 29 June 2020 22: 45 New
                      -2
                      Quote: Freeman
                      I assume that the sponsor is the budget of Moscow

                      As I understand it, a lottery is held throughout the Russian Federation, and the city budget does not provide for charity lotteries, especially since in some regions there is a budget deficit. A reasonable question arises, at whose expense is the banquet?
                      1. Freeman
                        Freeman 29 June 2020 22: 57 New
                        -1
                        Quote: mordvin xnumx
                        Quote: Freeman
                        I assume that the sponsor is the budget of Moscow

                        As I understand it, a lottery is held throughout the Russian Federation, and the city budget does not provide for charity lotteries, especially since in some regions there is a budget deficit. A reasonable question arises, at whose expense is the banquet?

                        I can answer only for Moscow. hi
                        That is:
                        The organizers of the program are the Moscow Chamber of Commerce and the Government of Moscow.
                        https://www.mos.ru/news/item/75628073/

                        "Programs" page:
                        https://ag-vmeste.ru/
                2. Nemchinov Vl
                  Nemchinov Vl 30 June 2020 22: 26 New
                  0
                  Quote: Freeman
                  No one forces you to go to the Gulag History Museum.
                  And as a "win" - it does not impose.
                  laughing out loud, when they are seriously discussing (!), stuffing, -
                  Quote: DymOk_v_dYmke
                  Others quietly swear, not knowing who to fuse free tickets to the Gulag History Museum.
                  like "a gift with a meaning?!.... aha ha ha ha ... laughing
                  Quote: Mordvin 3
                  And who is the sponsor of this charity?
                  not otherwise GUB CHK NKVD !!! lol lol
                  Quote: Mordvin 3
                  A reasonable question arises, at whose expense is the banquet?
                  already prompted?! .... lol
                  1. Freeman
                    Freeman 30 June 2020 23: 11 New
                    0
                    Nemchinov Vl (Vladimir) Today, 22:26
                    I laugh, I can’t, when seriously discussing (!), stuffing,

                    We do not discuss, but expose.
          2. 4ekist
            4ekist 29 June 2020 17: 16 New
            -2
            Do not carry heresy. But didn’t they make you write compelling? Or is this a new joke about mother-in-law.
          3. Tank hard
            Tank hard 29 June 2020 19: 41 New
            +3
            Quote: Malyuta
            The bosses forced the mother-in-law to vote, she voted against, now she curses Putin with obscene words.

            And do not you live in Ukraine? repeat
        2. antivirus
          antivirus 29 June 2020 16: 31 New
          0
          It doesn’t seem ... aggressive, it’s usually some kind of action, but for us ... indifferent

          VERY HARDLY TAKE THEIR, NOT UNDERSTANDED TO US "THINKERS AND SEERATORS" ..... you don't need much - enough quantity and quality is enough for them. therefore it is not noticeable
  • flicker
    flicker 29 June 2020 14: 22 New
    -9
    The statistics service claims that 76 percent of those who voted in favor of amendments to the Basic Law.
    drinks All the way through good
  • Eduard petrov
    Eduard petrov 29 June 2020 14: 25 New
    +4
    How easy it is to manage a crowd in the modern world ...
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 29 June 2020 15: 06 New
      -3
      And this is the case everywhere. Whoever pays the money is music. Trump is a prime example.
      1. Alex777
        Alex777 29 June 2020 15: 21 New
        -5
        Against Trump, hundreds of times more money than his. lol
        1. tralflot1832
          tralflot1832 29 June 2020 15: 25 New
          -4
          1 million out of 10 people who are against, 1 million out of 10 people who are for Trump. Who will have more votes?
    2. Nemchinov Vl
      Nemchinov Vl 30 June 2020 22: 31 New
      0
      Quote: Eduard Petrov
      How easy it is to manage a crowd in the modern world ...
      well?!, which is not certain ...
      Quote: tralflot1832
      And this is the case everywhere. Whoever pays the money is music. Trump is a prime example.
      there’s one for you, "not the best example", eg ... lol
      Quote: Alex777
      Against Trump, hundreds of times more money than his.
      which is also interesting (!).
  • fa2998
    fa2998 29 June 2020 14: 30 New
    +3
    This whole circus is anti-legal! There is an article about amendments to the Constitution. A commission is created, it was, then the Duma takes it in 3 readings, it was, after the approval of the Federation Council it is signed by the President-EVERYTHING !!! All this circus is a vote in the car racks, I know how to name it but admins do not miss!
    1. flicker
      flicker 29 June 2020 14: 35 New
      -2
      This whole circus vote in the trunk of cars
      Have you voted in the trunk of a car?
      Well, could you go to the polling station? request
    2. VicktorVR
      VicktorVR 29 June 2020 14: 44 New
      -5
      This is not a circus. A referendum on the confidence of the people in the president.
      However, “It doesn't matter who votes and how, it matters who counts and how” (C).
    3. Nasrat
      Nasrat 29 June 2020 14: 51 New
      +3
      Quote: fa2998
      // All this circus is a vote in the luggage racks of cars, I know what to call but admins will not miss!

      What do you have against voting in the trunk?
      Voting in the trunk is fashionable in Britain and is not considered a circus, but only a democratic expression of the will of the people ... Be more democratic! wink



      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 29 June 2020 15: 10 New
        -3
        The third photo is valid. Incorrect ballots can be used immediately for their intended purpose. A roll on a light green cabinet is not visible. Probably not casual.
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 29 June 2020 15: 22 New
          0
          Come inside. The roll is there. laughing
          1. tralflot1832
            tralflot1832 29 June 2020 15: 40 New
            0
            Let the British come in. It's like about our gopher, he is not visible, but he is there. And if the voting controller took home "shortage" during a pandemic. Judging by the photo, this is either the Arab or Sikh quarter. There is generally need water. The office for voting is too dumb, emigrants just right.
        2. Nasrat
          Nasrat 29 June 2020 15: 28 New
          -1
          Quote: tralflot1832
          The third photo is valid. Incorrect ballots can be used immediately for their intended purpose. A roll on a light green cabinet is not visible. Probably not casual.

          The oldest democracy !!! You won’t do anything ...
    4. 4ekist
      4ekist 29 June 2020 17: 20 New
      -2
      You are clearly not enough in the electoral committee of the Russian Federation. A real "head".
  • 7,62h54
    7,62h54 29 June 2020 14: 37 New
    -2
    The percentage of trust in the Dear Leader does not change from year to year.
  • Junior Warrant Officer
    Junior Warrant Officer 29 June 2020 14: 41 New
    10
    Of the 100.000.000 eligible Russians, 200.000.000 people visited polling stations.
    According to preliminary data, 300.000.000 people cast their votes for unwinding the counter, there are no against and no abstentions, one ballot was spoiled.
    1. Malyuta
      Malyuta 29 June 2020 14: 47 New
      0
      Quote: Junior Warrant Officer
      against and no abstentions, one ballot is spoiled.

      They wiped away what they had to wipe.
  • DVR
    DVR 29 June 2020 14: 43 New
    +2
    A pleasant natural result, which is quite consistent with the picture observed in reality (not on sites filled with protrols) bully
    1. Malyuta
      Malyuta 29 June 2020 15: 22 New
      +1
      Quote: DVR
      A nice natural result, which is quite consistent with the picture observed in reality (not on sites filled with protrols) bully

      Have you been out of self-isolation since March, do you still talk to the TV and the parrot? wink
      1. DVR
        DVR 29 June 2020 15: 52 New
        -3
        Have you been out of self-isolation since March, do you still talk to the TV and the parrot? wink

        No, I already had time to work, as I already mentioned here, and from today a long-awaited vacation :) Next week, mountains and the sea. And I sympathize with you, you also suffer from nausea, did not listen to my words :)
        1. Malyuta
          Malyuta 29 June 2020 15: 59 New
          +2
          Quote: DVR
          Next week, mountains and sea.

          Do not forget to pay the tourist fee, otherwise Putin will be upset, because he has little dough left laughing
          1. DVR
            DVR 29 June 2020 16: 12 New
            -1
            Do not forget to pay the tourist fee

            I have not yet been touched by any fees. My modest income is enough for a wonderful vacation. Though not in Bali or the Maldives, but we have plenty of beautiful places. And caves, and waterfalls, and mountains with forests, and the beautiful sea ...
    2. Alex777
      Alex777 29 June 2020 15: 24 New
      0
      Yes, people are fooled by publication curves.
      So far, for amendments (based on a survey where 30% of voters refused to answer) 53% of all. hi
      A moronic publication of sociologists will lead to the fact that those who are for - do not go, and those who are against - on the contrary, go.
  • BAI
    BAI 29 June 2020 14: 48 New
    +9
    76 percent of those who voted in favor of amendments to the Basic Law.

    Already 78. Peskov said that he knows nothing about the fact that state employees are forced to vote. Power, as always, has nothing to do with it. All initiatives from the bottom.
    1. Pereira
      Pereira 29 June 2020 14: 52 New
      +6
      Peskov is not interested. He needs a result, and a way - the lot of grassroots performers.
    2. Malyuta
      Malyuta 29 June 2020 15: 23 New
      -1
      Quote: BAI
      Already 78. Peskov said that he knows nothing

      His boss said that he always carries a blizzard. wassat
      1. DVR
        DVR 29 June 2020 16: 19 New
        0
        His boss said that he always carries a blizzard.

        Don't lie, Malyuta, he said literally: "He carries sometimes such a blizzard .. " wassat
    3. flicker
      flicker 29 June 2020 15: 35 New
      -2
      that state employees are forced to vote.
      Among relatives and acquaintances it is full of state employees and nobody said that they are forced to vote.
      Z.Y. Especially since you can vote against.
      ---
      So come up with something else bully
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 29 June 2020 15: 53 New
        0
        For Putin I had to take a ticket to report. For the amendments, generally silence, as if nothing was passing.
      2. Malyuta
        Malyuta 29 June 2020 15: 55 New
        +7
        Quote: flicker
        So come up with something else

        But why invent it, Putinism himself invented everything, always lie, everywhere and for any reason.
        Personally, I do not recognize this vote!
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 29 June 2020 16: 34 New
          -2
          Why do you need a law? The law is not written to you. wink
        2. AU Ivanov.
          AU Ivanov. 29 June 2020 16: 46 New
          -4
          Who is interested in your opinion? Sane people approved the amendments.
        3. Nemchinov Vl
          Nemchinov Vl 30 June 2020 22: 40 New
          0
          Quote: Malyuta
          But why invent it, Putinism himself invented everything, always lie, everywhere and for any reason.
          Personally, I do not recognize this vote!
          and two days later back to mother (!) ...?! You said she was just day / three works ?! . winked Well, that’s right ... lol and in the family there are fewer quarrels ... yes
      3. BAI
        BAI 29 June 2020 16: 43 New
        +5
        So come up with something else

        Why come up with? I am a state employee and today I have personally reported.
  • Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 29 June 2020 14: 48 New
    -7
    So I say that 76 percent is fair majority approval! So it's time to grow up and look at the situation objectively.
    1. unaha
      unaha 29 June 2020 14: 57 New
      +2
      Yes, it's all clear ... One tell me, where are you all hiding? Although ... on the other hand, in any bodies related to budget financing, I already have no close friends. Probably everything is there ...
      1. Tank jacket
        Tank jacket 29 June 2020 17: 32 New
        -5
        After the amendments enter into force, grant-eaters will have to hide, don’t you? wink
        1. unaha
          unaha 30 June 2020 11: 38 New
          +1
          Are you worried about the consequences of the amendments only "grant eaters"? I do not like the possibility of the president making (even this, even the subsequent ones) practically any decisions and the absence of mechanisms to prevent decisions and actions catastrophic for the country. Full control over the president of the government, Federation Council, court. We already had an emperor, how did the latter's reign end?
          1. Tank jacket
            Tank jacket 30 June 2020 17: 16 New
            0
            "I do not like the possibility of the president (though this one, even the subsequent ones) making practically any decisions and the absence of mechanisms to prevent decisions and actions catastrophic for the country. Full control over the president of the government, Federation Council, court."
            -----------
            More details please, otherwise "the king is good, the boyars are bad," inconsistently, somehow. Do you need control over the government by the president or not? crying
            And what about the State Duma now to the government? Is involved? repeat
            1. unaha
              unaha 2 July 2020 10: 46 New
              0
              "The tsar is good, the boyars are bad" - from what follows this conclusion?
              "Whether the president needs control over the government or not" depends on what is meant by "control." If the right to dismiss the government in case of unsatisfactory performance, then yes. If the direct intervention in the activity - no.
              "And the State Duma, what about the government now? Does it take part?" - What are you about? What does the legislature have to do with the executive?
              1. Tank jacket
                Tank jacket 2 July 2020 10: 48 New
                0
                "" And the State Duma, what about the government now? Participates? "- what are you talking about? What does the legislature have to do with the executive" "read the amendments ... Uhaha ... drinks
                1. unaha
                  unaha 2 July 2020 10: 51 New
                  0
                  If it does not complicate, specify the question. I read the amendments, of course.
                  1. Tank jacket
                    Tank jacket 2 July 2020 10: 52 New
                    0
                    The part where the State Duma and the government.
      2. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 29 June 2020 18: 31 New
        0
        In the public sector (education, science, culture), in government, in the army, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, as well as in state corporations and corporations with state participation, etc. it’s more like working together with the people than in small and medium-sized businesses, the fate of which many are so worried about.
  • Fungus
    Fungus 29 June 2020 15: 01 New
    -8
    The amendments are important. So they vote a lot.
  • Oleg Skvortsov
    Oleg Skvortsov 29 June 2020 15: 11 New
    +1
    30 million voted? Probably, they covered all state employees, all hospitals, including psychiatric departments, the army, the National Guard, security guards (much without them). And I’m not sure that they all taken together - 30 million and they gave 76% approval. All this is clowning
    1. flicker
      flicker 29 June 2020 15: 40 New
      -6
      Understand, bully you need to throw something on the fan
      including psychiatric wards
      Very funny ... laughing especially if you don't think: where is the guarantee that they will vote "for"?
      Trindet not bags tossing.
    2. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 29 June 2020 15: 57 New
      +1
      The prisoners were forgotten! They will vote for the amnesty as necessary. Ukrainians with dual citizenship will also catch up. And here is the desired result!
      1. Nemchinov Vl
        Nemchinov Vl 30 June 2020 22: 48 New
        0
        Quote: tralflot1832
        Ukrainians dual citizenship also catch up.
        ?! Seriously ?! why should they ?!... there seems relatively dual citizenship is not ice ?!.... Toli case in Ukraine (!) ... All heads of supervisory boards state companies and large corporations, - foreigners, or persons with just dual citizenship !!!... you hike for the same ??? (!)
        1. tralflot1832
          tralflot1832 30 June 2020 23: 18 New
          0
          I meant the Ukrainians receiving a pension in Ukraine and Russia. And there are a lot of such people. The GVP is loyal to such Ukrainians, but another will come and block oxygen.
    3. 4ekist
      4ekist 29 June 2020 17: 26 New
      0
      You can not vote. Take a ticket to a psychiatrist and use this day to good use.
  • parusnik
    parusnik 29 June 2020 15: 11 New
    +4
    Yesterday, I read in the news that the CEC received 116 complaints about coercion to vote ...
    1. flicker
      flicker 29 June 2020 15: 45 New
      -5
      I read in the news that the CEC received 116 complaints about coercion to vote
      I guess who, here in the VO there are just a hundred of these: ... svarog, stas, sylvester, Lexus ... bully
      ---
      And to go weak and vote against, since you were forced to?
      No, you have to whine!
      In the training manual it is said "forced to vote", which means it is necessary to promote this particular topic.
      Rotten, by the way. negative
      1. parusnik
        parusnik 29 June 2020 16: 32 New
        +5
        Do not take me weakly laughing Unlike you, in 1993 I did not vote for the pro-American Constitution, as they say now, which has deprived everyone of sovereignty. laughing I have not yet lost my mind to vote, for or against, amendments to what I voted against. laughing
        1. flicker
          flicker 29 June 2020 23: 30 New
          0
          Do not take me weakly
          It seems that it was not about you, but about 116 complainants who were "forced" ...
          They can vote against, and not complain.
          Yes, and it looks funny ... forced to vote ...
  • Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 29 June 2020 15: 19 New
    12
    The main thing is that when calculating the voters there shouldn’t be 146%.
    There are 2 voters in Kuzbass. Today on the site I was given a multifora with a mask, one-time gloves, a price list with the name of the amendments (for home study) and a fountain pen. the total cost of the contents is approximately 000 rubles. I no longer take street advertising and pay for employees who have to work on the site for 000 days.
    Question: is there really nowhere in the Kuzbass to spend 100 rubles, knowing in advance that the results of the vote will not change anything in the already adopted law?
    FARS OF PURE WATER.
    Kuzbass took the second place, losing only to the Republic of Tuva. In the Kemerovo region, about 795 people out of nearly 900 million voters voted, writes TASS with reference to the CEC of the Russian Federation.
  • prior
    prior 29 June 2020 15: 19 New
    +2
    If we take it in Russian, then in 5 days a little more than 21% of all voters voted for the amendments.
    It will not be enough, is it, Mr. President?
  • tagil
    tagil 29 June 2020 15: 23 New
    -15
    For garbage cats that live in this garbage.
    Since the vote has already begun, I will write again.
    Political and administrative aspects do not matter. All this will change a hundred times.
    The values ​​affirmed in the new constitution are of value.
    God
    Family
    State-forming Russian people
    Millennial history
    All this matters both in itself and because it moves us further and further from the degenerating "world community" destroying monuments and spitting at fathers.
    It is for this that we must vote.
    And if you think that at the last judgment we will not be asked "why did you renounce Me, knowing that My name is already persecuted?", Then you should not think so.
  • seregin-s1
    seregin-s1 29 June 2020 15: 37 New
    -9
    I didn’t think that there would be so many piles and skakuas here.
    1. flicker
      flicker 29 June 2020 18: 52 New
      -4
      I didn’t think that there were so many piles and skakuas here
      There are 100 people, today there are not so many of them.
      It seems that they are shocked by the results of VTsIOM - they tried to convince others that the people would be against the amendments - and in the end they "convinced" themselves, and so thoroughly that now they cannot believe in reality.

      It seems like a lot of bad guys. crying

      But I warned them not so long ago. They were busy. request
      1. habaroff.ven
        habaroff.ven 29 June 2020 20: 07 New
        -5
        Not fazyupyen, rulyovskaya blyuzatyana.
        1. flicker
          flicker 29 June 2020 22: 38 New
          -2
          Are you sick? We want to say something articulate, but it doesn’t work out? bully
    2. 4ekist
      4ekist 29 June 2020 22: 37 New
      -1
      Exactly, the bulk-yutubyaty, horses @ hlata, liberals and sexual minorities. I hear a friendly choir.
  • cokol-xnumx
    cokol-xnumx 29 June 2020 15: 55 New
    0
    parents have already voted "for", and on Wednesday, July 1, I will also go "for" the amendments and see at the same time how many people there will be for the sake of interest
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 29 June 2020 16: 38 New
      +2
      When I went on the second day - 2 people were on the site. sad
  • NordUral
    NordUral 29 June 2020 15: 58 New
    +1
    76%! It reminds me of something, sort of like March 18th.
  • flicker
    flicker 29 June 2020 15: 59 New
    -3
    "Forced them" bully
    As well as a certain character: "Not for self-interest, but only by the will of the wife who sent me" wassat
  • NordUral
    NordUral 29 June 2020 16: 15 New
    -2
    Also at this time in Moscow and the Nizhny Novgorod region there is a vote on amendments to the Constitution in electronic form. This opportunity has already taken advantage of 80 percent of voters who registered in advance. Out of more than 1 registered e-voting participants, the number of people casting their votes exceeded 190 thousand.

    They have an amazingly active electorate.
  • Gardamir
    Gardamir 29 June 2020 16: 20 New
    +2
    Interestingly, the vote is on, but the campaign continues
    1. Vladimir Mashkov
      Vladimir Mashkov 29 June 2020 16: 32 New
      -5
      And, notice, basically - YOUR efforts.
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 29 June 2020 18: 55 New
        +2
        You think I'm on TV commercials spinning. And me too in the subway?
  • BIABIA
    BIABIA 29 June 2020 16: 42 New
    -1
    "And remember, if there is a flower on the window of the election commission, then the turnout is failed ...")
    Apparently, there is no flower, everyone rushed to vote urgently ...
  • strelokmira
    strelokmira 29 June 2020 16: 45 New
    0
    based on some anonymous exit polls, 76 percent voted

    Stop a week ago, there was already talk about ZA in the amount of 76%)) The results were leaked in advance wink
    1. tatra
      tatra 29 June 2020 16: 52 New
      +2
      Yes, the Putin VTsIOM always gives numbers in advance, which then will be drawn by the Putin CEC.
  • tatra
    tatra 29 June 2020 16: 59 New
    +1
    There was the Yeltsin Constitution, the Yeltsin-Putin Constitution became, and Putin’s propagandists will have to remove from the manuals that Putin’s Yeltsin’s Constitution is always hindering Putin.
  • Poru4ik
    Poru4ik 29 June 2020 17: 15 New
    -1
    Not mine, fucked up on the Internet. This is about 76%

    The author is Nikolai Travkin.
    Another servant cleaned the virus
    A black jeep Grand Cherokee, which people who at least know a little about the history of their homeland, is called a “funnel”, drove into the courtyard of a Moscow elite house at 4 a.m. Three strong-built men in identical gray suits entered the porch, went up to the floor and went to the door ...

    But it turned out that they were late. The door opened, before they had time to ring, and from it the ambulance officers carried out the head of the VTsIOM on a stretcher. Already lifeless ...

    The iPhone was beeping at 3 in the morning. The chief Kremlin sociologist woke up and cursed: “Who doesn’t sleep in the dead of night?” A friend from New York called. The Americans had another evening, and they naively believed that the whole world lives by their clock. A friend was interested in the fact that there is hot news on the Bloomberg tape that Putin’s rating according to VTsIOM for April fell to 27%. Say is this true? And if true, then didn’t the coup take place in the Kremlin?

    The first thought of the head of VTsIOM was: “Confused,!”

    That is, subordinates, stunned by drunkenness at the удал, ке »иру,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин, подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин подчин therefore, subordinates, stunned by drunkenness on the" remote ", where they sent the coronavirus epidemic, a package with data from a closed poll, intended for the 1st deputy of the Presidential Administration, was sent to the media. This thought turned out to be the last. The forehead was covered with cold perspiration, a hot needle pierced the brain, and the iPhone fell from the weakened hand of a man who knew how to guess what the Russians were thinking.

    Therefore, people in white coats who arrived at the call of his wife, who sensed something was wrong with her sensitive heart, and carried his lifeless body out of the apartment on a stretcher ...

    Damn you, coronavirus, which ruthlessly kills our best, state people!
    ➡ Source: https://www.publizist.ru/blogs/109589/36028/-
  • Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 29 June 2020 17: 17 New
    +4
    Still, you need to bring joy to the discussion of the process:
  • Snail N9
    Snail N9 29 June 2020 17: 17 New
    0
    Who would doubt that there will be "at least 75%". Even before this "vote" more than once, there were statements in the media that at least 75% of the population "approve" the "amendments". So, everything is in the announced trend. wink yes lol
  • habaroff.ven
    habaroff.ven 29 June 2020 17: 35 New
    +3
    Bitter and insulting for our Russian people. Patience, not men. Some kind of dough, from which noodles are made and hung on the ears. I would try to make fun of the rounded French so.
    1. DVR
      DVR 29 June 2020 18: 08 New
      -3
      Bitter and insulting for our Russian people. Patience, not men. Some kind of dough, from which noodles are made and hung on the ears. I would try to make fun of the rounded French so.

      Proud of our people, well done men. Do not give once again hang noodles on the ears.
  • parusnik
    parusnik 29 June 2020 17: 58 New
    -1
    "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" .... All those who voted in 1993 for the pro-American Constitution, after 27 years shit..eeeee they are discussing voting for amendments that, regardless of the result of the vote, will be adopted ... Surprisingly, those who voted against in 1993 go vote for or against amendments, to which they voted ... laughing
    1. DVR
      DVR 29 June 2020 18: 25 New
      -2
      Surprisingly, those who voted against in 1993 go to vote for or against amendments, to which they voted against ...

      People want to contribute to changing the state of things. If such an opportunity exists, why not? Your position is also not entirely logical.
      Unlike you, in 1993 I did not vote for the pro-American Constitution, as they say now, which deprived everyone of sovereignty. laughing I have not lost my mind to vote, for or against, amendments to what I voted against. laughing

      You did not vote in 1993, but you are forced to live under the Constitution you voted against, and you cannot go anywhere while you live in the Russian Federation. Do you want to continue living "under the Constitution" for which no one voted? Your right. Someone decided otherwise and decided to vote to amend the Constitution, against which, like you, you voted against in 1993. People see in the amendments what was lacking in 1993. That is why they voted in 1993 "against", and now - "for".
      1. parusnik
        parusnik 29 June 2020 19: 06 New
        +1
        I voted against, that’s the difference ... As the Pro-American Constitution was, it remained so. It was written under the presidency, and it remains so ... Cherry will not run out, beets will not blossom after amendments or no amendments ... But you hope, and suddenly the cones on the birch grow. I myself am glad to be deceived, but somehow I do not want to ...
        1. DVR
          DVR 29 June 2020 19: 17 New
          0
          I voted against, that’s the difference ...

          I just wrote about those above who voted "against" in 93rd. "Someone decided otherwise and decided to vote to amend the Constitution, against which, like you, you voted against in 1993."
          I myself am glad to be deceived, but somehow I do not want to ...

          I'd rather risk "cheating", maybe something will turn out. For the alternative is not at all deceiving. In my opinion, these amendments do not worsen the situation in any way, but they may well improve (IMHO). I never deny others, like you, the right to have their own position, it's a personal matter.
          1. parusnik
            parusnik 29 June 2020 19: 53 New
            -6
            Yes, we’ll rely on the Russian chance ... I don’t argue, they will improve it. They’re improving it. From the electric company, I received a notification that electricity has risen in price this month ... Of course, they will improve ... people will have happiness, happiness forever, because we have power , strong arm .... And how to get out at the parade ... laughing
            1. DVR
              DVR 29 June 2020 20: 17 New
              0
              that electricity has risen in price this month

              There are many on the site of the afflicted laughing All days sitting and whining in the comments. If only they tried to work, or this is their vocation. I hope that even though you are not starving, it will remain for food after the excessive payment for electricity. And then there’s not enough strength for the parade wink
  • Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 29 June 2020 18: 09 New
    -2
    There is nothing surprising in these figures, on the face of another juggling of terms and%, designed to shake minds and draw attention to this dumb initiative. More than 80% of those registered in electronic voting - it was not just that they registered there. A significant part of these people is what is called "softly coerced" - these are state employees, a near-party element, officials, security officials, etc. Since we have these rather bloated states - you understand. The real interest in this whole initiative is about 30 million. About 26 million of the population of the Russian Federation are children and adolescents (not so long ago this figure sounded in the media), Let's say 4 million is in a frankly incapacitated state, someone abroad, someone is sitting - total ~ 115-118 million remaining (from 148 million total statistical) - we boldly take the figure of 110 million (and it will even be underestimated) in order to consider this figure as people who are affected by this vote.
    We are told that 31 million people have already voted - I am very skeptical of one million registered people, well seriously .. as Lobkov’s case showed, it’s muddy water and maybe a second vote, but even if not, to drive a million bonded laborers is a question.
    There remains about 30 million - that's a little more than a QUARTER of these same 110 million. What day is it? Fourth fifth ? And how many of these people (out of ~ 27%) voted "Against"?
    It is very clearly seen in this way that despite horsebacks, 3/4 people in general don’t care at all to promote this campaign. So here juggle — don’t juggle what the table is and the chair :-)
  • Nicknt
    Nicknt 29 June 2020 18: 25 New
    -4
    Quote: Looking Petrovich
    Quote: Sergey 777
    The statistics service claims that 76 percent of those who voted in favor of amendments to the Basic Law.

    Uh ... strange to say the least.

    76% of them are so customary to draw. Edro in the Duma also has 76% of the seats, although no one votes for it.

    This number is registered in the CEC training manual, and now it will still be enshrined in a worn-out constitution
  • Old26
    Old26 29 June 2020 19: 00 New
    +1
    Quote: DVR
    We go home. Already come several times.

    Maybe they go somewhere, but none of the acquaintances knows about this. I would like to have a look at me ... I’ll have to go vote for the amendments myself, which I will certainly do in the near future.

    To do this, the EMNIP had to inform the precinct commission before the 21st day that you want you to come home. Or through the older house, if the house is multi-family.
    Well, then - according to the scheme
  • Ryaruav
    Ryaruav 29 June 2020 19: 08 New
    +1
    if we take the regions without cities of over one million people, then everyone who has a salary of 40 or more and who has a pension of 20 or more will definitely vote for amendments, Putin, and all this quadrille for 30 years
    1. CT-55_11-9009
      CT-55_11-9009 1 July 2020 15: 59 New
      0
      Quote: Ryaruav
      if we take the regions without cities of over one million people, then everyone who has a salary of 40 or more and who has a pension of 20 or more will definitely vote for amendments, Putin, and all this quadrille for 30 years

      Outside "millionaires" such salaries and pensions still need to be found. Although ... My grandmother (already deceased, blessed her memory) with all the allowances received 18 thousand rubles. But: long experience, disability, three children and age over 80 ... But salaries of 40 thousand and more are quite thieves for themselves, it is difficult to get through them.
  • Old26
    Old26 29 June 2020 19: 10 New
    +1
    Quote: Oleg Skvortsov
    30 million voted? Probably, they covered all state employees, all hospitals, including psychiatric departments, the army, the National Guard, security guards (much without them). And I’m not sure that they all taken together - 30 million and they gave 76% approval. All this is clowning

    And residents, citizens of the Russian Federation, dust for you? You do not consider them? Normal people?
  • Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 29 June 2020 19: 22 New
    0
    Someone's liquid somehow.
    At our factory, the turnout is at least eighty percent. But rather it will strive for a hundred. After explanatory conversations with non-conscious elements.
    And here are some miserable twenty-eight! ... However, the people were crushing.
    Then they sing songs, but they didn’t ask us ... But we didn’t go ...
    So go dear friends. What is the problem ?! Express your thoughts wise, in the open spaces of paper. hi
  • seregin-s1
    seregin-s1 29 June 2020 19: 37 New
    +4
    I voted for Putin and for constitutional amendments! I managed to feel the traitors of the people inside. I am 53 years old. As an officer, the terrible collapse of the army, as the head of the family, survival conditions. Howl komunyaki and heaped up! Your end is coming! You will work, and we will force you to study!
    1. Tank hard
      Tank hard 29 June 2020 19: 55 New
      +5
      Quote: seregin-s1
      I voted for Putin and for constitutional amendments!

      Well then, your position, you have every right. I have a mother born in 1951, a retired Interior Ministry captain. has government awards. And has its own opinion. I went and voted for the amendments, although I tried to dissuade. But the line with two former Soviet officers are forced to do something against his will. I respect her choice. And you. hi
    2. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 29 June 2020 22: 26 New
      0
      Quote: seregin-s1
      Howl komunyaki

      You yourself, ohvitser, have never been a communist-Komsomol-pioneer, of course?
      1. Freeman
        Freeman 29 June 2020 22: 50 New
        +2
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        Quote: seregin-s1
        Howl komunyaki

        You yourself, ohvitser, have never been a communist-Komsomol-pioneer, of course?

        As for the "ochwitzer", you have correctly noticed.
        Judging by the text
        I am 53 years old. As an officer, the terrible collapse of the army, as the head of the family, survival conditions. Howl komunyaki and heaped up! Your end is coming!

        - Probably along with Wrangel in 1920 he was evacuated from Crimea.
        And with age, obviously modest.
        Not 53, but 153 - the first "zeroed" in the history of Russia! wassat laughing / sarcasm /
  • Serpet
    Serpet 29 June 2020 19: 47 New
    +5
    Strange ... We have data from exit pools diametrically opposed.
  • Anton Sverlov
    Anton Sverlov 29 June 2020 19: 53 New
    0
    Voting is not about a choice, but about legitimizing a decision made at the top. And this is completely normal, because the country is ruled by the bourgeoisie, and not at all by some "Vasi" from your Internet. The state is bourgeois, it is up to them to decide what is here and how it should be ... And no change of the government, the prime minister, or even the (oh my God) guarantor himself will change anything. So all this talk around, they are in favor of the poor ... Only a change in the state structure as a whole can bring about changes, but this does not threaten us in the foreseeable future.
  • orionvitt
    orionvitt 29 June 2020 20: 16 New
    +3
    I read the comments and was very surprised. And Russia has come under an epidemic of global stupidity of a part of the population who are against fundamental amendments to the constitution. And it's not about Putin, it's a trifle. My rule is simple. If the Navalny, the Venidiktovs, and all sorts of Gozmans-schmozmans, heart-rendingly scream that they need to vote against, it means that they definitely need to vote for. If in the west and in the ukraine, pouring out poison, they declare that the Russian constitution was "raped" (they would look at their own laughing ), then without options, Russia is doing everything right.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Foolfox
      Foolfox 1 July 2020 11: 05 New
      +2
      I totally agree! It is believed that more than half of the amendments have not been read. They saw - Putin - and they immediately began to burn ... Why read the amendments? Why think with your own head? There is YouTube)) There is Navalny with ducks)) My opinion is that some of those present are not smart people, some are mishandled Cossacks ... My brother voted against it. To the question of why, he answered: "Well, Putin will become president again, the country will be plundered ...". For me, this is an indicator ... but the fact that you, petty for ****, studied for free, bought an apartment, bought a car and plan a vacation at sea - this is from a bad life under Putin ... Curtain!
      1. orionvitt
        orionvitt 1 July 2020 12: 44 New
        +2
        Quote: FoolFox
        I totally agree!

        Just in the next branch (about the launch of the falcon), I picked up some cons, from individuals who believe that Putin is hindering the state. He reminded them that they have a bad memory, how the same Putin pulled the country out of the 90s, such a g .... rose. It turns out that "the 90s were long ago," "it's time to forget," they say, "we live in the 21st century," "Putin is the main problem" of Russia and "must leave." In general, the whole set. Moreover, they do not offer alternatives, they simply repeat the mantra, "Putin must leave." I don't understand what people have in their heads.
  • Imperial Technocrat
    Imperial Technocrat 29 June 2020 20: 44 New
    +1
    76% - excellent result, even better than expected good
  • Koval Sergey
    Koval Sergey 29 June 2020 20: 57 New
    +5
    Outright agitation. But it is prohibited during the voting period.
    1. seregin-s1
      seregin-s1 29 June 2020 21: 26 New
      +7
      You are confused with something. Campaigning is prohibited the day before the election. Are we picking someone?
  • Aleks2000
    Aleks2000 29 June 2020 21: 13 New
    -7
    Did someone think he won’t be for?
    76% is a convenient pre-determined figure. Just like for edra, for which no one voted, but 76% have ....
  • Ulysses
    Ulysses 29 June 2020 22: 18 New
    0
    Quote: Alex777
    The neighbors bounced repeatedly:
    After Kravchuk there was Kuchma-get.
    After Kuchma - Yushchenko fear.
    After Yushchenko - Yanukovych-Zlochnin.
    After Yanukovych - Poroshenko.
    Well, now Zelensky. wink
    Do you want to learn from your mistakes?
    I would be preferable to strangers. hi



    History teaches that teaches nothing.
    Each time, regular fanatics with an unhealthy gleam in their eyes believe that their result will converge with their plan.
  • Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 29 June 2020 22: 36 New
    +2
    And here is agitation?!. Conversation over the turnout is ongoing.
    And the secret of the vote, no one has yet been canceled by gentlemen and ladies!
    Do not confuse the south coast of the north sea with the north coast of the south.
  • Klingon
    Klingon 30 June 2020 02: 16 New
    -2
    Quote: doubovitski
    Quote: Klingon
    yes, herd mentality, base instinct, but it works. Here's an example for you: my wife voted against, I do not vote because I cannot TK. I don’t have any snils there (I don’t even know that this is a shopping center, we have been living in Germany for a long time, but we have Russian citizenship), but I would vote against it. And mother-in-law and grandmother voted FOR, my wife and I asked damn what for voted FOR? and mother-in-law grit and what, "Lucy (sister) voted FOR, well, we too"
    And believe me, these are the majority who do not think with their own head but do it like everyone

    By your delirium, I still do not understand, are you FOR or AGAIN? are you sculpting about your mother-in-law, about my spouse, about ..... The head itself, as she herself thinks, or does Frau Merkel listen to the broadcast?

    Amiable prim .... with what fright are you with me on you? learn to read first, let me remind you, the first letter in the alphabet A! (not B not P not X and not S) so. I explain for the gifted. I am against the amendments and consider them nonsense. I can’t vote because I don’t have SNILS. Well, he didn’t dream of me what to do!
  • Whirlwind
    Whirlwind 30 June 2020 07: 29 New
    +1
    "Do not count your chickens before they are hatched"