Israel’s response to Egypt’s readiness to begin assembling Russian T-90MS tanks

196

The readiness of an Egyptian defense industry enterprise to begin assembly is reported tanks T-90MS from kits supplied from Russia under the contract. This is a contract, on the basis of which the Egyptian army intends to receive about 500 T-90MS tanks in the next few years.

It is noteworthy that the assembly of Russian T-90MS tanks in Egypt will be carried out at the same factory where the assembly of American Abrams tanks was previously carried out. At the moment, the capacity of the Egyptian plant is such that every year the company will be able to collect 50-60 T-90MS tanks, however, it is planned that production capacities can be increased.



The news that Egypt was preparing to start the assembly cycle of Russian tanks was reacted in Israel. So, material has been released on the Israel Defense resource today, the author of which states literally the following:

Sources from the Israeli Ministry of Defense claim that if this is a real deal, then this is a very alarming step in the aspect of Israeli interests.

T-90MS is a tank, the mass of which, together with the ammunition load, is 48 tons. Power density - 23 hp per ton. The maximum speed is 70 km / h. The height of the combat vehicle is 2228 mm. The range of target recognition in daytime conditions is up to 5 km. The caliber of the gun is 125 mm. The tank has a high degree of automation, is equipped with a laser guidance system for the target, a laser rangefinder, thermal imaging complex, dynamic protection "Relic".
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    196 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +5
      28 June 2020 18: 30
      A good modification, which we ourselves unfortunately do not have in the troops. But what about the Abrams? What did they not do with the Egyptians?
      1. +44
        28 June 2020 18: 34
        Quote: Magic Archer
        What did they not do with the Egyptians?

        When the Muslim Brotherhood was dropped in Egypt, Washington turned off the tap.
        After which the Egyptians seriously thought ...
        1. +44
          28 June 2020 18: 41
          Quote: Magic Archer
          But what about the Abrams? What did they not do with the Egyptians?

          The same than the Iraqis did not suit at one time. Dear, they eat a lot, capricious, difficult to manage, a problem with spare parts, and most importantly Arabs are traditionally used to Soviet technology. Accordingly, Russian is much closer to them. Moreover, it has proven its effectiveness.
          1. +19
            28 June 2020 18: 47
            Quote: seti
            The same than the Iraqis did not suit at one time.

            The Egyptians received them as part of military assistance.
            And for a free tank "Abrams" is simply incredibly cool
            1. +24
              28 June 2020 21: 25
              But even a free tank, if it has a mass of 70 tons, gets stuck in the sand.
              Why did the Indians at one time choose the T-90, and not the Abrams. hi
              And by the way, why are our partners in Israel worried?
              T-90 more Abrams respected? bully
              1. +1
                29 June 2020 18: 42
                Any change in the balance of power in the Middle East and the Maghreb is fraught with claims to hegemony.
          2. +6
            28 June 2020 19: 09
            rather a very expensive service overall. Iraqis themselves simply cannot serve them even at the minimum level. only through certain structures. which means in a country in which wars and conflicts are going on complete insanity
            1. 0
              28 June 2020 19: 19
              So I’m thinking of buying a Passat B7 or, well, its ....
              1. +6
                28 June 2020 19: 20
                I’ve been to the Japanese all my life, so the Germans are a dark forest for me)
                1. -2
                  28 June 2020 19: 21
                  I am also in the Japanese, but the thought crept in to try something new)))
                  1. -1
                    28 June 2020 19: 23
                    personally I’m not in life) not mine) I touched with friends. I did not like.
                    1. +4
                      28 June 2020 21: 29
                      Quote: carstorm 11
                      touched friends. I did not like.

                      No need to touch, especially with friends. Drive an Audi RS6, better at the wheel. Dynamics Nissan GT-R, comfort like a business class.
                      1. +3
                        29 June 2020 02: 25
                        touched it figuratively) and I'm unfortunately not a fan of 5 points on the asphalt to rub) I like that higher
                      2. +2
                        29 June 2020 10: 38
                        In the family is the old Mazda MPV 2000. and Tiguan 2010. The second has already eaten the whole brain with regular problems. Mazda with an engine Ford runs for health. With mileage under 400k. Only now the box began to slip. But soon I’ll shake it myself. There are spare parts for 20k rubles. Tiguan will not forgive this.
                        FakinVagen is good only for those who always have extra loot in their pocket. Ride so much, but according to the service staff this is PPC.
                  2. +3
                    29 June 2020 09: 34
                    Quote: Clever man
                    I am also in the Japanese, but the thought crept in to try something new)))

                    Don't experiment - you will regret it. The Germans became "disposable". The quality has dropped greatly.
                    1. +3
                      29 June 2020 21: 51
                      Perhaps they really became "disposable" I don't know, I have no money for the new Germans. But I drive a three-ruble note - E46 (mechanics), I'm very happy, no problem. 17 years ago BMW made good cars.
                2. 0
                  29 June 2020 04: 46
                  Quote: carstorm 11
                  I’ve been in Japanese all my life, so the Germans are a dark forest for me

                  All DV has long been in the Japanese. Germans are not quoted
                  1. 0
                    29 June 2020 05: 52
                    Well, let's say so quoted but much less. otherwise the dealer VW would not open.
                3. -2
                  29 June 2020 07: 12
                  The Germans are expensive equipment, but not in terms of quality, but service. It breaks constantly. And expensive repair parts.
              2. +3
                28 June 2020 23: 19
                In no case do not buy, especially with dsg. A quick step past this machine
                1. +2
                  29 June 2020 02: 06
                  Quote: Runoway
                  In no case do not buy, especially with dsg. A quick step past this machine


                  this is why you gave such advice? did your DSG gearbox break in your car? or did a neighbor tell you that he was reading a story from a guy whose garage neighbor knows a story about a broken DSG?
                  1. +3
                    29 June 2020 05: 59
                    Twice, every 60t.km and besides a lot of things, as a result, this is a miracle of technology at the age of 5 with an ideal body sold for six months and hardly went for 600t
                    1. -1
                      29 June 2020 07: 52
                      Was that a trade wind? And if you take a jet on the mechanics?
                      1. -1
                        29 June 2020 08: 54
                        It was also the fifth, weakest one, 5 1.6 horses of everything. In general, VW is unreasonably expensive to maintain. For example, to serve the same polo at the same price as a Japanese crossover, it's not worth it
                        1. 0
                          29 June 2020 10: 06
                          I don’t know what to buy then (((
                        2. +1
                          29 June 2020 10: 40
                          And now all the cars are like that. Even Yotota became one. Mazda was the last one to be assembled in Japan, except for the CX-9, it is assembled here in the Far East.
                        3. 0
                          29 June 2020 23: 40
                          In the sense of the latter? I have Pradik, diesel 2.8, assembly Japan, 34t.k. mileage, 120 horseradish grader as on the Moscow Ring Road, silence in the cabin, not a single breakdown, not even a single light bulb burned out, there are all diode ones))
                        4. 0
                          30 June 2020 11: 15
                          and you still continue to "eat cactus"?)))
                    2. 0
                      1 July 2020 01: 02
                      just out of luck
                2. +1
                  29 June 2020 08: 51
                  DSG they are different, if DKYU200, with a dry clutch - this is one thing, if 250 with a wet one - then another, the Germans are a different philosophy of the car, you have to try it, it tastes and color ... as they say :)
              3. KCA
                +1
                29 June 2020 02: 34
                Better B4 and not know the problems at all
                1. 0
                  29 June 2020 10: 42
                  He is old. Strong yes. but with quality parts is a disaster. People from a good life do not put steering racks from the Amulet. The platform is the same. Passion B3-B4, Seat Toledo, Cherie Amulet.
                  1. KCA
                    0
                    29 June 2020 11: 01
                    In VAG, the most rotten link is Seat, it’s much better for Skoda to buy any health and nerves than Seat, and what are the problems with B4 spare parts? Skoda Octavia is still afloat, Bora, A4-A6, it's all an old B4 platform, well, body contours are different, but the pieces of iron in it are the same
                    1. +1
                      29 June 2020 11: 17
                      With quality parts. Those. only Chinese remained. You will find the original horseradish.
                2. +1
                  29 June 2020 13: 32
                  we have 4 is a Subaru)))
              4. 0
                29 June 2020 07: 49
                Better B8, now they can be driven inexpensively. Relatively. Very much better than the new Vesta in a complete set
                1. +1
                  29 June 2020 10: 42
                  The fact that it is better to keep it is for sure, given that it is a B-class, and Passat is an E-class.
              5. 0
                29 June 2020 10: 33
                DO NOT EVEN THINK ABOUT IT! Moody AVNO!
                1. -1
                  29 June 2020 12: 47
                  Four familiar acquaintances already have 16-18 years old freshly recognized. No problem. Very satisfied
              6. 0
                9 July 2020 09: 21
                Already wrote - do not experiment. If the DSJ is a box, then the resource is 70 thousand. And in general, the parts are expensive. I already went through this. On the secondary, WAG sells poorly, so they lose quickly in price.
          3. -8
            28 June 2020 20: 57
            A link about the "capriciousness of the Abrams" and "difficult to manage" do not share?
            1. +9
              28 June 2020 21: 23
              Quote: Jack O'Neill
              A link about the "capriciousness of the Abrams" and "difficult to manage" do not share?

              Here is an article on this year.
              A brief summary of the article:
              Abrams is beaten by outdated weapons, eats a lot of fuel, often fails (especially often the fire control system and tower hydraulics), an uncomfortable driver's seat
              https://topwar.ru/166944-chem-boleet-abrams-osnovnye-nedostatki-glavnogo-tanka-armii-ssha.html
              In general, Google to help
              1. -8
                28 June 2020 21: 34
                https://topwar.ru/166944-chem-boleet-abrams-osnovnye-nedostatki-glavnogo-tanka-armii-ssha.html

                Yeah, read it. The author does not quite understand what he is writing about.
                An article is an ordinary template with stamps.

                In general, Google to help

                The most popular excuse ...
                Like, if I say that the Earth is flat, then I can also send for proofs in Google?
            2. 5-9
              +4
              29 June 2020 09: 57
              Look at the experience of the Iraqis .... they bought back about 7 years ago for 150 M1A1 unfinished and about the same number of ancient wretched export, or even Eastern European, T-72s ... today Abrams are not used, they are crushed and broken, T-72 are used . I did not see reviews from Iraqis that in terms of combat effectiveness M1A1 surpass T-72M ...
          4. 0
            29 June 2020 16: 16
            [quoteа The main thing Arabs are traditionally accustomed to Soviet technology. ] [/ quote]
            - and most importantly, Arabs are traditionally accustomed to abrams.
            You fire a side / rear projection of a tower from 12 mm DShK - and voila.
            8-))
        2. +8
          28 June 2020 20: 37
          Quote: Spade
          Quote: Magic Archer
          What did they not do with the Egyptians?

          When the Muslim Brotherhood was dropped in Egypt, Washington turned off the tap.
          After which the Egyptians seriously thought ...

          That's right. If you look at Egypt’s arms purchases with the advent of Sisi, then practically no American arms are bought.
          1. +13
            28 June 2020 21: 27
            Obama was very fond of the Muslim Brotherhood. It didn't help them in the end. laughing
        3. 0
          29 June 2020 13: 16
          Could not even write the truth here! Not 500 tanks, but 500 + 1 tank.
      2. 0
        28 June 2020 18: 49
        The main question is the quality of the assembly of tanks, and the observance of the secrecy regime for certain components and devices of the tank, as well as the lack of technology!
        1. -9
          28 June 2020 19: 05
          Quote: Thrifty
          technology leakage!

          What is there to leak?)) AZ or a cannon from the 70s?)) To the engine?) 47 years old, how does this tank stand in service)) the most modern thing there would fly is French electronics))
          1. The comment was deleted.
      3. +5
        28 June 2020 18: 50
        Here t-90ms is better in their case. And especially for the cost of operation.
      4. +23
        28 June 2020 19: 05
        we have our own modification went t 90 m. specifically 27 separate already sit on them
        1. 0
          29 June 2020 04: 49
          Quote: carstorm 11
          we have our own modification went t 90 m.

          Maybe one of the tankers will enlighten - what are the differences between the T-90MS and the T-90M?
          1. +4
            29 June 2020 05: 50
            start with the gun. on export stands 2A45M on our 2A46M or if you decide 2A82 and so on for a number of mechanisms and devices. export modification is always at least a little bit worse.
      5. Hey
        +12
        28 June 2020 19: 31
        What did they not do with the Egyptians?

        "Abrams" were transferred to Egypt practically for nothing. But repairs and spare parts cost so much money that it is easier to buy a new tank.
      6. +16
        28 June 2020 19: 45
        Abrams: hard, expensive in both manufacturing and maintenance. Want to ruin a country, get Abrams for free.
      7. +11
        28 June 2020 19: 57
        Quote: Magic Archer
        A good modification, which we ourselves unfortunately do not have in the troops.

        Why do we need an export version with underestimated characteristics if the T-90M Breakthrough is already arriving in the troops ?!
      8. +3
        28 June 2020 19: 57
        T-90MS is a simplified T-90M (Breakthrough-3)
      9. +6
        28 June 2020 20: 53
        Our troops are T-90M
      10. +8
        28 June 2020 23: 32
        But what about the Abrams? What did they not do with the Egyptians?


        Abrams are good as an anti-tank weapon, and to support infantry it is better to have a tank that can shoot OFS shells. T-90MS is suitable for this and costs 5 times cheaper than Abrams.
      11. +1
        29 June 2020 09: 26
        But will the t-90m be worse?
      12. 0
        30 June 2020 16: 46
        "Egypt to start assembling" - let them start first! This is talk about nothing.
    2. +14
      28 June 2020 18: 32
      All questions to the Main Ally ...
      While Washington did not try to return terrorists to power in Egypt through sanctions, the country's authorities were not puzzled by the decrease in dependence on the United States in the BT sector.
    3. -41
      28 June 2020 18: 34
      Well, the IDF has a SPIKE the best rocket in the world, no big deal, all tanks will be burned
      1. +23
        28 June 2020 18: 40
        They didn’t boast about walking on the army, but boasted with the rati turning.
        1. -13
          28 June 2020 19: 54
          Quote: demo
          They didn’t boast about walking on the army, but boasted with the rati turning.

          well, as it were, three times "turned around" already and Egypt. even smashed there, t55, t62 and some more small things.
          1. +18
            28 June 2020 19: 56
            Remember the joke of the bull and the bullfighter?
            The last phrase of the waiter - once at a time is not necessary. That bull bullfighter, and today the bull bullfighter. hi
            1. -5
              28 June 2020 19: 56
              Quote: demo
              Remember the joke of the bull and the bullfighter?
              The last phrase of the waiter - once at a time is not necessary. That bull bullfighter, and today the bull bullfighter.

              we all walk under the sun.
              1. +6
                28 June 2020 19: 58
                Yes, and I about it!
      2. +11
        28 June 2020 18: 40
        well, so we can sell TOSs to smoke rocket launchers, a volume explosion and baked carcasses with spit out lungs are provided
        1. -26
          28 June 2020 18: 43
          If Pinocchio, then it has a small range, its UAV of Israel will easily destroy, Israel will have better UAVs than Turkish
          1. +11
            28 June 2020 18: 48
            And think about it?
            The Israelis are not afraid of tanks ...
            1. +5
              28 June 2020 20: 40
              Quote: Spade
              And think about it?
              The Israelis are not afraid of tanks ...

              Yes, we and Egypt today are not very afraid. The main opponents of Egypt today are Ethiopia and Turkey.
              1. +3
                28 June 2020 21: 31
                Please explain, is Israel Defense infa a topic or a fake? hi
                The main opponents of Egypt today are Ethiopia and Turkey.

                So it is so. Ethiopians take water, but it seems they somehow agreed with them on the timing of filling the reservoir.
                And with the Turks they have a clinch - Erdogan really likes the Muslim Brotherhood.
                1. 0
                  28 June 2020 21: 36
                  Quote: Alex777
                  Please explain, is Israel Defense infa a topic or a fake? hi

                  This is a very serious blog. But there, as elsewhere, different authors are printed and they have different opinions.
                  1. +1
                    28 June 2020 21: 37
                    If I correctly understood your politically correct answer - do you still think that a fake? wink
                    1. +5
                      28 June 2020 21: 43
                      Quote: Alex777
                      If I correctly understood your politically correct answer - do you still think that a fake? wink

                      In terms of fake? The author, on the one hand, is not 100% sure that this agreement will be implemented. And on the other hand, of course, the supply to the arsenal of a mass of modern tanks in the not very stable country that borders us will force us to spend additional money on the purchase of weapons.
                      1. +1
                        28 June 2020 21: 49
                        I have not read the source text, so I’m interested in you. smile
                        That the contract will be executed is very likely. There are problems in Libya.
                        My IMHO - precisely because of this, Egypt is increasing military power.
                        When I asked about fake, did I mean if there is real concern or is talk of it exaggerated? hi
                        1. +7
                          28 June 2020 22: 07
                          Quote: Alex777

                          When I asked about fake, did I mean if there is real concern or is talk of it exaggerated? hi

                          Officially, of course, no one said anything, but if the army will not be worried, then the entire General Staff should be dispersed.
                        2. -1
                          29 June 2020 00: 02
                          Quote: Aron Zaavi
                          if the army does not worry, then the entire General Staff must be dispersed.

                          Well, the General Staff should be "screwed up" from time to time in order not to think of preparing for the past wars. And what about worrying - you have caring neighbors there in an obscene amount that they help to maintain tone. laughing
                        3. +6
                          28 June 2020 22: 37
                          Quote: Alex777
                          I didn’t read the source text,

                          I asked the source text. This is referred to by Israel Defense. There is not a single word about the Israeli Defense Ministry, nor about alarming steps, nor about aspects of Israeli interests.

                          Link to the original:
                          https://defence-blog.com/news/army/egypt-reportedly-signed-contract-for-500-t-90ms-main-battle-tanks.html
          2. -10
            28 June 2020 19: 11
            Do not care Israel for ground equipment. He who controls the air wins. Israel will not allow Egypt to even transport these tanks to the Sinai.
            1. +2
              28 June 2020 19: 28
              Quote: Grazdanin
              He who controls the air wins.

              It seems that American aircraft are considered quite combat-ready ....
              You think not?
          3. KCA
            +1
            29 June 2020 02: 47
            Well, of course, in the Russian Federation in the engineering troops, some stupid people serve, they saw a flock of Turkish unmanned vehicles, which means they need to drive the Buratinoks there, they don't know about the Thor and the Pantsir and other air defense systems, yesterday they only showed it on Zvezda new guide pipes for TOS, however, only showed, the characteristics were kept silent, but they said that the range had increased significantly, perhaps it was 6 km, it became 9, 3 km for a UAV, this is a lot, you need to be able to fly
          4. +1
            29 June 2020 04: 56
            Quote: Samara_63
            If Pinocchio, then it has a small range, its UAV Israel will easily destroy

            Knowing that drone drones (especially "the best in the world") are circling over you, it would be the height of stupidity and recklessness of the command to move forward on "Buratino" without the cover of the military air defense. Or do you think that only the Jewish military are so smart, and the rest are rams?
        2. -9
          28 June 2020 20: 55
          TOS-1A "Solntsepёk" has a maximum firing range of 6000 meters (with new missiles). The infantry Spike-LR has a range of 5500 meters. The mobile (jeep) Spike-ER has a range of up to 8000 meters. Taking into account that the TOS-1A is a hefty machine designed for shooting at stationary area targets, and the Spike is designed for accurate shooting at moving targets, I would not be so sure of the superiority of the Russian heavy flamethrower over the light Israeli ATGM.
          1. +4
            28 June 2020 21: 25
            Quote: ZeevZeev
            Given the fact that the TOS-1A is a hefty machine designed for shooting at fixed area targets, and Spike is designed for accurate shooting at moving targets, I would not be so sure of the superiority of the Russian heavy flamethrower over the light Israeli ATGM.

            the sun also doesn’t really need to aim), but I’m not talking about that - the spike has not yet recommended itself as a T90 killer, otherwise it will be like tovs, some kind of figulin and the whole rocket)
            1. -7
              28 June 2020 21: 54
              "Spike" fully established itself as the killer of the T-72, which confidently hit the roof of the tower. In April 2016, when the Armenians and Azerbaijanis once again fought in Karabakh. I don't think that the T-90 from the upper hemisphere is much better protected than the T-72.
              1. +2
                28 June 2020 21: 59
                Quote: ZeevZeev
                "Spike" fully established itself as the killer of the T-72, which confidently hit the roof of the tower. In April 2016, when the Armenians and Azerbaijanis once again fought in Karabakh. I don't think that the T-90 from the upper hemisphere is much better protected than the T-72.

                ) t72 with haer or without haer?
                1. -4
                  28 June 2020 22: 11
                  And what is "haer" in this case?
                  1. +1
                    28 June 2020 22: 53
                    Quote: ZeevZeev
                    And what is "haer" in this case?

                    scallop from a packet of vertical sheets of iron, it hits from above
                    1. -3
                      29 June 2020 05: 58
                      And how can this "haer" protect against a tandem shaped-charge warhead?
                      1. 0
                        29 June 2020 11: 41
                        And doesn’t he hit with a shock core?
                        1. 0
                          1 July 2020 20: 07
                          Not. Tandem, as far as I know.
          2. +3
            28 June 2020 22: 03
            Enough to carry nonsense, no one will shoot according to a separate calculation of the ATGM with weapons that hit the areas. Solcepek / Pinocchio line the fortified area, base, roadblock, etc. And against the calculation of anti-tank systems now the most effective is aviation / UAV, or another calculation of anti-tank systems. Here is the wearable Cornet 5000m on a machine 10000m, Everything will depend on who is the first to find the enemy
          3. 0
            29 June 2020 05: 05
            Quote: ZeevZeev
            Given the fact that the TOS-1A is a hefty machine designed for shooting at fixed area targets, and Spike is designed for accurate shooting at moving targets, I would not be so sure of the superiority of the Russian heavy flamethrower over the light Israeli ATGM.

            Given the terrain and the number of buildings, Pinocchio is much more likely to cover the area where Spike is supposed to be with solid fire than Spike to find Buratinushka.
            1. -1
              29 June 2020 08: 39
              Did you mean "much less"? Finding a hefty tank is, in principle, easier than calculating an ATGM.
              1. +1
                29 June 2020 09: 17
                Quote: ZeevZeev
                Did you mean "much less"? Finding a hefty tank is, in principle, easier than calculating an ATGM.

                Why look for him? You just need to know the approximate location on the square in several football fields. It would be enough.
                A joke in Israel about the musketeer and Ilya Muromets know?
                1. 0
                  1 July 2020 20: 10
                  That is, for one calculation will you spend a package of a heavy flamethrower? And if there will be two calculations? Three? Even the approximate location is not known. Neither in range nor in azimuth.
          4. 0
            1 July 2020 08: 47
            compared horseradish with a finger. CBT will always hammer from closed positions, and then quickly and quickly wound off. As has always been since the Great Patriotic War
      3. -6
        28 June 2020 21: 07
        Is Petrosyan a student?
      4. -1
        29 June 2020 04: 52
        Quote: Samara_63
        Well, the IDF has a SPIKE the best rocket in the world

        And Israel also has the best Western Wall in the world. Although it is not known why it is better than the Great Chinese? Apparently, this is also the case with the best rocket in the world.
        1. +1
          29 June 2020 08: 45
          There is no Wailing Wall in Hebrew. There is a "Kotel a-Maaravi" (Western Wall). And judging by the keen desire of a billion (or more?) Muslims, which many Muslim leaders declare, to capture Jerusalem, it is still better and more important than the Chinese Wall.
      5. KCA
        -1
        29 June 2020 11: 32
        At least Spike in the open field, even Javelin is a mass grave, well, a very long preparation for a shot, in the city, from the roof there, yes, it makes sense if the BMPT did not level the roof of the house with the first floors, or the OFS 125mm did not arrive
    4. +9
      28 June 2020 18: 49
      But what did Israel suddenly dislike? They have peace-friendship-chewing gum with Egypt ... They should be glad that a friend is getting stronger, and 500 of these tanks are real strength.
      1. +9
        28 June 2020 18: 53
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        But what did Israel suddenly dislike? They have peace-friendship-chewing gum with Egypt ... They should be glad that a friend is getting stronger, and 500 of these tanks are real strength.

        some blogger didn’t like it, in fact, under an agreement between the countries, Egypt cannot transfer tanks to the Sinai, only under an agreement with Israel, as it was not long ago, when tanks were transferred to the Sinai to fight Muslim brothers
        1. +9
          28 June 2020 19: 01
          Quote: igor67

          some blogger didn’t like it, in fact, under an agreement between the countries, Egypt cannot transfer tanks to the Sinai, only

          And how long will it take to transfer tanks to the Sinai? There are distances ... If there is something to transfer, there is a way ... But why? Tanks alone do not solve anything. They need much more, and infantry, and artillery and aviation. And most importantly, the goal. Does Egypt have a goal to destroy Israel? Iran has ...
          1. +7
            28 June 2020 19: 04
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            Quote: igor67

            some blogger didn’t like it, in fact, under an agreement between the countries, Egypt cannot transfer tanks to the Sinai, only

            And how long will it take to transfer tanks to the Sinai? There are distances ... If there is something to transfer, there is a way ... But why? Tanks alone do not solve anything. They need much more, and infantry, and artillery and aviation. And most importantly, the goal. Does Egypt have a goal to destroy Israel? Iran has ...

            in principle, I’m talking about the same thing, Egypt suffers from internal contradictions with problemsmm Ethiopia Libya, Before the victory of the Muslim brothers, tens of thousands of Israelis rested in Sinai, visa-free,
          2. +11
            28 June 2020 19: 08
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            Does Egypt have a goal to destroy Israel?

            "In military affairs, not intentions are important, but potential" (c)
            And the less Egypt is dependent on the US defense industry, the higher this potential
            1. -4
              28 June 2020 21: 00
              So the dependence of the Egyptian military-industrial complex did not disappear, it just changed the vector.
          3. -6
            28 June 2020 19: 20
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            Does Egypt have a goal to destroy Israel?

            All Arab countries have this goal, who speaks openly, who means. At least read the history of that region.
            1. +3
              28 June 2020 21: 57
              If we take the number of Arabs killed in clashes and wars among themselves and compare with the number of Arabs killed in wars with Israel, then after reading a comment like "All Arab countries ........", the thought arises - have you read commentator history of the region
          4. +8
            28 June 2020 20: 11
            Tanks, decoys, toss! The main thing is the morale of the soldiers! But the Arabs have to deal with this! I am not a fan of Israel, but their soldiers are motivated and morale high!
            1. -5
              28 June 2020 20: 39
              Quote: maiman61
              Tanks, decoys, toss! The main thing is the morale of the soldiers! But the Arabs have to deal with this! I am not a fan of Israel, but their soldiers are motivated and morale high!

              The highest morale in WWII was among the Japanese - they practically did not give up, fought to the end, officially practiced kamikaze, but this did not help them either against Amers on the islands or against the Red Army
              1. +3
                28 June 2020 21: 38
                Quote: Krasnodar
                The highest morale in WWII was among the Japanese - they practically did not give up, fought to the end, officially practiced kamikaze, but this did not help them either against Amers on the islands or against the Red Army

                the fact that they "kamikaze" practiced is not a reason, read Japanese memoirs about kamikaze, and Japan flooded to the United States after sniffing the battles with our Mongols.
                1. 0
                  28 June 2020 22: 54
                  Was reading. Before ours, Japan fought in China. Yes, and rushed to Amers, not finishing off China
                  1. +2
                    28 June 2020 22: 59
                    Quote: Krasnodar
                    Was reading. Before ours, Japan fought in China. Yes, and rushed to Amers, not finishing off China

                    and from China they benefit zilch, Hitler demanded everything to attack the USSR, but they decided that it would be easier for them to fight for resources with the USA
                    1. 0
                      28 June 2020 23: 07
                      I read the following:
                      There were two factions that found supporters in the government, general staff and navy. One demanded the Soviet Far East, the other considered it appropriate to fight for Southeast Asia. Supporters of the second faction, in particular, blocked the sending of additional aviation forces to the Halkin Goal, considering it pointless to lose pilots in a fight for Mongolia. About the Soviet Far East in 1941 they said the following - we will wait when Russia, like a ripe fruit, falls into our hands after defeat from the Germans. It was believed that it would be easier for them to receive resources from Southeast Asia.
                      1. +3
                        28 June 2020 23: 12
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        About the Soviet Far East in 1941 they said the following - we will wait until Russia, like a ripe fruit, falls into our hands after a defeat from the Germans. It was believed that it would be easier for them to receive resources from Southeast Asia.

                        everything is correct, did not wait
                        1. -1
                          28 June 2020 23: 16
                          In addition, the land forces of the Yaps looked pale compared to the Red Army, for the war on the islands - the very thing against the Soviet armored armada on the mainland - nothing. This they understood under Khalkin Gol.
                        2. +3
                          28 June 2020 23: 25
                          Quote: Krasnodar
                          for war on the islands

                          our Kuril Islands took 2 weeks
                        3. +2
                          28 June 2020 23: 28
                          My grandfather fought in Sakhalin. About the Japanese spoke so - fanatics. A soldier chained to a firing point was held.
                      2. +6
                        28 June 2020 23: 18
                        The United States announced an embargo on oil supplies and promised to drown those who supply oil to Japan. This is a de facto declaration of war. So Japan had no options.
                        1. +1
                          28 June 2020 23: 26
                          That's right, that's why they struck Pearl Harbor. But then went the depressing of everything that the British and Americans can do, according to the plan drawn up earlier. The main goal was the territory of modern Indonesia - oil and rubber.
                        2. 0
                          28 June 2020 23: 29
                          It is always surprising where the discussion sometimes goes in the comments.
                        3. +1
                          28 June 2020 23: 37
                          As with a good feast - ultimately it comes down to talking about women or a fight laughing
              2. 0
                29 June 2020 12: 01
                Good day everyone. "they practically did not surrender, they fought to the end," then their Kwantung army surrendered almost completely.
                1. 0
                  29 June 2020 12: 04
                  After the order of Hirohito
          5. +2
            28 June 2020 22: 11
            Egypt seemed to be about to bomb some kind of dam in Ethiopia, and he has quite peaceful sayings
            1. 0
              29 June 2020 09: 48
              read an article about this dam. this is a colossal project. it must be "dismantled" either now, or later it will be too late, because in the event of a breakthrough there, half of Egypt will be washed away. like about 70% of the population can wash away. most of them live on the banks of the Nile. and Ethiopia seems to be taking a very tough position. they have like half of the country without electricity. and they invested heavily in this construction. about 8% of GDP. Italians are building like.
              So all the talk about Israel is about nothing. Egypt has enough problems without Jews.
      2. 0
        28 June 2020 19: 55
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        But what did Israel suddenly dislike? They have peace-friendship-chewing gum with Egypt ... They should be glad that a friend is getting stronger, and 500 of these tanks are real strength.

        without chewing gum.
      3. +7
        28 June 2020 21: 15
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        But what did Israel suddenly dislike? They have peace-friendship-chewing gum with Egypt ... They should be glad that a friend is getting stronger, and 500 of these tanks are real strength.

        The problem is that in Egypt, someone like ISIS or Muslim brothers can seize power. It was already a matter of taking, and in a completely democratic way, with the knowledge and approval, if not at all from the filing, of the great Obama Democrat. It was lucky that the military was able to resolve the situevina and push the Islamists back from the feeder. And if you could not? The last time the military did not succeed in Turkey, and it is not known where the Islamist Erdogan would lead her in the end, but Turkey is relatively far from Israel. And to get hold of the fanatic Islamists armed with modern technology in the nearest neighbors is still the prospect.
      4. +1
        29 June 2020 00: 42
        But what did Israel suddenly dislike?

        I apologize, but please remind me, but what did they like and when did they like it at all? Well, with the exception of other people's problems, of course, at least the collapse of the USSR, at least the Islamic state is.
    5. -9
      28 June 2020 18: 58
      A logical decision, what is the difference which tanks are about ...?)) Here, at least it will not be so expensive. And so with whom would they fight there? With Israel they cannot. Libya, Sudan, Ethiopia and other Abrams crap are redundant, T90 is more than enough, quantitative parameters are more important here, not qualitative.
      1. +7
        28 June 2020 19: 02
        Quote: Grazdanin
        And so with whom would they fight there? With Israel they cannot.

        Apparently, the Israelis are not so capricious mood ....
        1. 0
          28 June 2020 19: 18
          Sisi hangs from the first day in the balance of Sisi) Even many military officials do not like him, of those who are in thoughts with Mursi. If supporters of Mursi come to power, they think about this in Israel. And this prospect in Egypt did not disappear. Abrams, this Dependence on the USA, T90 gives an alternative chance during the embargo, if that ...
          1. +3
            28 June 2020 19: 23
            Quote: Oquzyurd
            But such a prospect in Egypt has not disappeared.

            Right?
            Do you think that again all sorts of Qatar and Turkey will give terrorists money, and they will again seize power in Egypt?
            1. +2
              28 June 2020 19: 35
              No, I don’t think so. It's just that there are not so many supporters of Mursi, and the economy is crawling, dissatisfaction is growing. These problems will be added next year due to the Ethiopian dam, which, by holding water, will create a catastrophe in Egypt's agriculture. Even now, in at the moment, Egypt is taking out the IMF debt at high interest rates in a row. I don’t think that Turkey’s problems are in Egypt’s problems.
        2. -8
          28 June 2020 21: 06
          The Israelis have a sane attitude towards the capabilities of the Egyptian armored forces. If Egypt tries the events of May 1967, when Nasser introduced tanks to Sinai, threatening the Jewish state, then Israel may well repeat the events of June 5, 1967 (Operation Moked), and then June 6-7-8, when those left without air cover Egyptian tanks burned with napalm (in the literal sense of the expression) old "Hurricanes", "Misters" and almost training "Fugues". Although adjusted for the development of technology and aviation weapons, the tanks will be burned by "Helfires" and "Spikes" from UAVs and helicopters.
          1. +5
            28 June 2020 21: 53
            Zeyev, stop throwing slogans, you’re not on the podium. To begin with, an article in a newspaper is not an official line of the government, so cool down you are our winner .. Egypt decided to prepare in advance to replace the armored vehicles lost during the DB. The collision with Ethiopia is most likely (in my opinion 65%) will be (see China). Pressure on the PNS with the Turks is a simple desire to protect the right flank before the conflict (well, to train your military a little, and maybe take a few wells laughing .)
            By the way, the former, and now Israeli citizens, the conflict between Egypt and Ethiopia will not affect the traffic on the channel? Will not affect the oil and gas transportation? You know better from yourself.
            1. -6
              28 June 2020 22: 26
              Let me ask you, what is "ex" like? Former Russians? Well, for example, I have never been to the territory of the Russian Federation. Former Soviet? So the USSR collapsed 30 years ago. Former who?
              And as for the issue with the Channel ... Ethiopia has no access to the sea, navy, and any real military opportunity to disrupt the operation of the Channel. Yes, and there is no particular desire to disrupt traffic.
              1. +1
                28 June 2020 22: 58
                Yes, the former are the former (who are Soviet, who are Russian, it doesn’t matter) On the channel’s account, the question is what: both countries have strong pathos, modern weapons and support are enough for both sides. Under these conditions, some take extraordinary actions (for example, to strike on ports or ships in the channel)
    6. 0
      28 June 2020 19: 13
      There is always someone to fight with. What about the dam in Sudan? How is it in fraternal Libya?
      1. -2
        28 June 2020 19: 45
        Dam in Ethiopia, near the Blue Nile. The remainder of the water after the dam flows through the territory of Sudan to Egypt.
        1. -1
          29 June 2020 08: 20
          Quote: Oquzyurd
          Dam in Ethiopia, near the Blue Nile. The remainder of the water after the dam flows through the territory of Sudan to Egypt.

          the Egyptians will not agree to a "remnant". there will be war sooner or later.
          1. +1
            29 June 2020 14: 12
            Quote: Maki Avellievich
            Quote: Oquzyurd
            Dam in Ethiopia, near the Blue Nile. The remainder of the water after the dam flows through the territory of Sudan to Egypt.

            the Egyptians will not agree to a "remnant". war sooner or later be

            I understand those who were minus do not know what thirst is and how other people can be cut out for water and food. straight God's lambs.
      2. 0
        28 June 2020 20: 18
        While still can not agree.
    7. 0
      28 June 2020 19: 15
      T-90MS with a new gun?
      1. -1
        28 June 2020 19: 23
        Who knows? All the news from the Facebook post. In general, everything is strange. No official news.
    8. 0
      28 June 2020 19: 16
      Sources from the Israeli Ministry of Defense claim that if this is a real deal, then this is a very alarming step in the aspect of Israeli interests.

      "Ruso tourist, the image of morality" Will save the state of Israel Well, there are no visas, only more expensive than Sochi. This is unacceptable. And vashcheto We have already delivered Antey to Egypt - 2500. And no terrible exorcism, and the tanks suddenly scared
    9. +3
      28 June 2020 19: 24
      I will say that this is very, very good news for UVZ and related enterprises. Enterprises will receive loading for several years and good foreign exchange earnings. Perhaps after the fulfillment of the contract, the Egyptians will want to increase the number of tanks purchased. And here, against the background of border graters with China, the Indians began to look closely at Armata. Although I am still skeptical about the current technical condition of this tank, but who knows, maybe the new Indian contract will be the impetus that will give this tank a real ticket to the conveyor, instead of the current manual assembly.
      1. -1
        28 June 2020 19: 30
        Everything is at the level of rumors, even this contract. There is no official news.
        1. -1
          28 June 2020 20: 04
          Quote: Grazdanin
          Everything is at the level of rumors, even this contract. There is no official news.

          Yes, there is no official information yet, nor about the procurement contract for 24 Su-35s.
      2. AUL
        0
        28 June 2020 19: 39
        Quote: mdsr
        Enterprises will receive loading for several years and good foreign exchange earnings.

        But only with prepayment! Money in the morning - chairs in the evening! For I know these Arab brothers.
        1. -4
          28 June 2020 20: 12
          Quote from AUL
          But only with prepayment! Money in the morning - chairs in the evening! For I know these Arab brothers.
          I doubt that Egypt has so much money. The country is already not rich, but there are also problems with tourism due to the coronavirus. Yes, and traditional sponsors, CA and the UAE, are experiencing great financial difficulties. So finding about 2,5-3 billion dollars for the purchase of 500 tanks and another about 2 billion dollars for the 24 Su-35s, which we discussed earlier, is almost impossible for Egypt. One way remains - loans.
          1. -3
            29 June 2020 06: 27
            Quote: mdsr
            So to find about 2,5 - 3 billion dollars for the purchase of 500 tanks and another about 2 billion dollars for 24 Su-35,

            And while that lose 1,5 billion. US military aid dollars annually. As it does not seem to be true.
    10. 0
      28 June 2020 19: 35
      It smacks of anti-Semitism. laughing
    11. +2
      28 June 2020 19: 44
      Yes, they do not need tanks, but soldiers, because the Egyptians are still warriors, whatever they give them, they will turn everything into scrap metal.
    12. +3
      28 June 2020 19: 47
      Well, what can I say, orders for UVZ will definitely not be redundant. And let the United States continue relations with partners in the same manner. You look at UVZ more clients will be added ... lol
    13. ZVS
      -5
      28 June 2020 19: 55
      Egypt has not yet begun the assembly, and the Jews have already put in their pants?
      1. -4
        29 June 2020 06: 48
        Quote: SU
        Egypt has not yet begun the assembly, and the Jews have already put in their pants?

        This can only be written by the one who washed these pants.
        But in fact, in the war in the war of 1973, 1200 Soviet T-54 and T-55 tanks were destroyed, more than 500 were captured completely intact and marched at the parade in Tel Aviv.

        That's where the Soviet leadership was washing his pants.
        1. -1
          29 June 2020 08: 23
          Quote: Vitaly Gusin
          Quote: SU
          Egypt has not yet begun the assembly, and the Jews have already put in their pants?

          This can only be written by the one who washed these pants.
          But in fact, in the war in the war of 1973, 1200 Soviet T-54 and T-55 tanks were destroyed, more than 500 were captured completely intact and marched at the parade in Tel Aviv.

          That's where the Soviet leadership was washing his pants.

          Well, Egypt now has about 500 t-55 if not more in storage. For 1973 it’s not a tank
          1. -1
            29 June 2020 09: 45
            Quote: Pilat2009
            t-55 if not more. for 1973 not a very tank

            T-55 - medium tank. Created on the basis of the T-54 tank. It was produced in 1979. The world's first production tank equipped with an automatic anti-nuclear defense system is a pioneer of a new generation of military vehicles capable of conducting combat operations in the context of the use of nuclear weapons.
            1. +2
              29 June 2020 10: 11
              Quote: Vitaly Gusin
              Quote: Pilat2009
              t-55 if not more. for 1973 not a very tank

              T-55 - medium tank. Created on the basis of the T-54 tank. It was produced in 1979. The world's first production tank equipped with an automatic anti-nuclear defense system is a pioneer of a new generation of military vehicles capable of conducting combat operations in the context of the use of nuclear weapons.

              How can sealing a tank and boost inside and some protection against radiation can help in a local war?
              1. -1
                29 June 2020 12: 12
                Quote: Pilat2009
                How can sealing a tank and boost inside and some protection against radiation can help in a local war?

                Do not take me aside.
                At that time it was the most modern tank.
                1. -1
                  29 June 2020 15: 24
                  Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                  At that time it was the most modern tank.

                  Even more modern T-62, T-64, T-72?
                  I do not think so ... lol
                  1. +1
                    29 June 2020 19: 54
                    Quote: Ded_Mazay
                    T-62, T-64, T-72?

                    The development of the T-62 tank began in 1957,
                    A prototype was made in 1959, in 1960-1961 it was tested. The T-62 tank was a further development of the T-55 tank, it had the same layout, and it used the same components and assemblies as the T-55 tank.
                    . Serial production of the T-62 was carried out in the USSR from 1962 to 1973.
                    Adopted by the Armed Forces of the USSR since 1973
                    I wrote about the 1973 war
                    1. +1
                      29 June 2020 22: 22
                      Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                      I wrote about the 1973 war

                      In 1971, the Soviet Union delivered the first T-62s to Egypt; in the same year, the United States delivered the first M60A1s to Israel.
                    2. -1
                      30 June 2020 15: 26
                      Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                      I wrote about the 1973 war

                      So what? Do you want to say that in the year 73 Egypt and Co. did not have t 62 in service?
                      Once again, the phrase
                      Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                      At that time it was the most modern tank.
                      to t 55 against the background of T 62 and M 60 is not particularly applicable.
                      1. +1
                        30 June 2020 17: 54
                        Quote: Ded_Mazay
                        So what? Do you want to say that in the year 73 Egypt and Co. did not have t 62 in service?

                        No, they were, but it doesn’t matter, it was all broken and captured. And then it repeated in 1982.
                        1. 0
                          30 June 2020 19: 59
                          Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                          No, they were, but it doesn’t matter, it was all broken and captured.

                          Hint at the worthlessness of Soviet technology? In vain.
                          Because before 73 and 67, there were also 48, when there was no smell of Soviet equipment in the arsenals of Israel's opponents. But the result "for some reason" was the same ...
                        2. -1
                          1 July 2020 06: 23
                          Quote: Ded_Mazay
                          Hint at the worthlessness of Soviet technology?

                          Not at all.
                          War is a battle of technology, trained fighters, competent military commanders and the understanding that you are defending your country.
                          And so that the soldier would understand that she is her own, the country must do the maximum for its people.
        2. +1
          29 June 2020 11: 50
          I think if they switched weapons completely, the result would be the same.
        3. ZVS
          -1
          2 July 2020 11: 02
          Do not confuse the 73rd since 2020. Jews now wash their pants for any reason.
          1. -1
            2 July 2020 13: 19
            Quote: SU
            Do not confuse 73rd since 2020. Jews now wash their pants for any reason.

            Do not confuse!
            This is far from 1973, this is the first quarter of the 21st century.
            Today in syria all wash their pants, and some do not even have time to change.
            This is only half a year.
            2020 year
            June 28th. Unidentified planes attacked objects about Iranian police in Al-Bukamal
            27th of June. Unidentified aircraft attacked objects of the Syrian army and pro-Iranian police in the village of Al-Abbas near the city of Al-Bukamal
            June 23. "Al-Arabiya", the target of the attack was a base of pro-Iranian forces, to which a military cargo from Iran was delivered in the morning.
            June 7th. Unidentified UAVs attacked the headquarters of the Iranian police at Meisile base, in the eastern part of Dir al-Zur governorate.
            June 4th A blow was struck at an Iranian military facility near the city of Masyaf west of Hama. Caused significant damage.
            May 4th. A blow was struck at a pro-Iranian police facility in the al-Mayadin desert (Dir al-Zur governorate), on the Syrian-Iraqi border. According to SOHR, 14 Iranians and Iraqis were killed.
            May 4th. A military research center was attacked in the province of Aleppo, in the area of ​​As-Safir.
            May 1. The Israeli Air Force attacked Hezbollah's warehouses in Homs.
            The 1 of May. Helicopters hit several targets in the Kuneitra region
            April 27. Objects of Iranian forces and Lebanese Hezbollah were attacked
            20 April. In the province of Homs attacked an object located to the north of the airfield of the Syrian Air Force "Al-Tiyas".
            April 15th. In the area of ​​the Yabus junction, between Damascus and the Lebanese border, a car was destroyed by an air strike.
            March 31. Syrian media reported that the IDF Air Force attacked targets in the province of Homs. Later it became known that objects at the Shayrat airbase were attacked.
            11th of March. Unidentified UAVs attacked targets at the base of the Shiite pro-Iranian group Kataib Imam Ali (Imam Ali Battalions) in the Al-Bukamal region in eastern Syria, near the border with Iraq.
            5th of March. Military targets were attacked in the area of ​​the city of Homs and in the governorate of Quneitra. According to media reports, Hezable's headquarters was attacked,
            2nd of March. The IDF hit a car in southern Syria after sniper shelling from the Syrian side was recorded. The IDF press service confirmed this information. On March 17, the IDF published details of the attack.
            28th of February. SANA claims that IDF helicopters attacked targets of the Syrian government army and the Allied Forces (Hezbollah) in southern Syria.
            February 27. SANA says an Israeli UAV attacked a car in southern Syria, near the village of Hadar, killing one person. According to reports, the head of Hezbollah's infrastructure in Syria has been liquidated. The IDF does not comment on this information.
            February 23. Strikes were made on targets in the Damascus area. Islamic Jihad targets attacked in Syria
            February 13. The attacks were carried out on the objects of the pro-Iranian forces south of Damascus, including in the arms depots.
            February 6. An air strike was struck on targets in the Damascus area. SOHR claims to have killed at least 23 people: three Iranians, 12 militants from the Iranian militia and eight Syrians.
            January 14th. The strike was struck at the military airfield T4 in the province of Homs. The missile defense system was activated.
            January 10. unidentified aircraft attacked the positions of pro-Iranian armed formations in the area of ​​the city of Al-Bukamal on the Syrian-Iraqi border. Lebanese TV channel Al-Mayadin, associated with Hezbollah. According to the TV channel, a truck with weapons on its way from Iraq to Syria was destroyed. As a result, vehicles and weapons depots of the paramilitary Al-Hashd al-Shaabi militia were struck.
            January 9. unknown planes attacked targets in the area of ​​Al-Jala and Al-Abbas, near Al-Bukamal.
            January 8. Reports: Unknown planes attacked targets in the village of Al-Majawda, near Al-Bukamal, where the Iranian militias are stationed. On this day, in the Al-Sambli area, near Al-Bukamal, there was a transfer of heavy weapons and armored vehicles from the pro-Iranian militias to the Lebanese Hezbollah.
            4 January. Aircraft attacked positions about Iranian militias in the area of ​​Al-Bukamal on the Syrian-Iraqi border.
            THERE ARE NOT EVEN WANTED TO EVEN.
            Yes, and in Iran it is bad with the pants, after they tried to get into the Israeli water supply system.
            On the night of June 26, in the vicinity of the military base of Khojir, near Parchin, southeast of Tehran, two powerful explosions rang out, after which a red glow could be observed from the Iranian capital.
            This base was included in the list of Iran’s nuclear facilities, inspections of which for many years were unsuccessfully sought by experts from the IAEA.
            July 2, 2020
            Iranian media report an incident at a uranium enrichment plant in Natanz. According to incoming reports, an explosion occurred here. The Iranian Atomic Energy Organization reported that the nuclear facility in Natanz was damaged as a result of the incident.
            Well, something like pants laughing
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. ZVS
              -1
              3 July 2020 11: 30
              Jew, and you are a snitch. Actually, this is not new. In the 37th, the largest number of informers was among the Jews. They also prevailed in the leadership of the OGPU. They subsequently led almost all the Gulag.
              So get a pair of pants The Trump Democrats will eventually leave, and Obama showed their attitude towards the Jews of Israel, a parasite country sucking finance from the US budget. Yes, and the UN confirmed Erdogan's words about the fascist nature of Israel, speaking out for the liberation of the occupied Arab lands. Hitler occupied European countries, Israel occupied Arab lands ... Consonantly, isn't it ?.
    14. The comment was deleted.
    15. 0
      28 June 2020 20: 45
      So let these Israelis remove American military formations from the Black Sea, expel their military infrastructure from Georgia. Then the conversation will be.
      1. 0
        28 June 2020 21: 26
        Quote: 1536
        So let these Israelis remove American military formations from the Black Sea, expel their military infrastructure

        Some people are still convinced that the Jewish kagal rules the world, and Trump himself in front of them stands quietly stretched out. And Putin too. And all sorts of smaller ones like Merkel and other Macrons can finally kneel down and open their mouths. So I have the only advice - do not miss the time of taking the medicine.
        1. ZVS
          -2
          2 July 2020 11: 05
          These are the only Arabs who are fighting the Jewish world domination.
          And trump destroys the world’s governance system built by Jews from the inside. As soon as the era of the dollar ends, so will the end of Jewish encroachments on the lands of other countries and their resources.
    16. 0
      28 June 2020 20: 49
      Anxious in terms of increasing modern tanks?
    17. +1
      28 June 2020 20: 53
      "Sources from the Israeli Defense Ministry claim that if this is a real deal, then this is a very disturbing move in terms of Israeli interests." (c) Sorry guys, your interests are not in the scope of our interests. laughing
      1. +1
        28 June 2020 21: 44
        Quote: Captive
        "Sources from the Israeli Defense Ministry claim that if this is a real deal, then this is a very disturbing move in terms of Israeli interests." (c) Sorry guys, your interests are not in the scope of our interests. laughing

        more precisely enter as far as they enter)
        "Debt good turn deserves another"
        very old Russian proverb
    18. -3
      28 June 2020 22: 22
      The author is not without a sense of humor.
    19. Maz
      0
      28 June 2020 22: 54
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      Quote: Alex777
      If I correctly understood your politically correct answer - do you still think that a fake? wink

      In terms of fake? The author, on the one hand, is not 100% sure that this agreement will be implemented. And on the other hand, of course, the supply to the arsenal of a mass of modern tanks in the not very stable country that borders us will force us to spend additional money on the purchase of weapons.

      It’s Aron that you correctly misunderstood about money, the main thing is to make a fuss about this business and knock out the grandmothers from the budget and buy money from the allies - from the USA. Maybe break off. But you have to try and sketch. The holy Jewish cause is the main thing to stake out ...
      1. +1
        29 June 2020 09: 01
        Quote: Maz
        It’s Aron that you correctly misunderstood about money, the main thing is to make a fuss about this business and knock out the grandmothers from the budget and buy money from the allies - from the USA. Maybe break off. But you have to try and sketch. The holy Jewish cause is the main thing to stake out ...

        There's nothing you can do. For humanitarian reasons, there were a lot of people who came along for a long time, they need to be fed, and they are ungrateful
        ... and they give the giving hand — they bite, and the breadwinner — they spread rot, but at the same time they don’t take it from the breadwinner’s hands, but very gladly, they can even cry out that you give little, you bastard!
    20. 0
      29 June 2020 00: 46
      The news is great. An order for 500 car kits will support production and create good conditions for the supply of tanks to the Russian army.
    21. 0
      29 June 2020 08: 01
      And what are the Indians silent? Was there information about the purchase of the T-90MS by the Indians and silence?
      1. 0
        29 June 2020 09: 39
        So there are still not all dances danced.
        Here the car kits will go to Egypt and the Indians will immediately wake up.
    22. 0
      29 June 2020 08: 17
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      Quote: Spade
      And think about it?
      The Israelis are not afraid of tanks ...

      Yes, we and Egypt today are not very afraid. The main opponents of Egypt today are Ethiopia and Turkey.

      Iran not?
    23. 0
      29 June 2020 09: 37
      This is a contract, on the basis of which the Egyptian army intends to receive about 500 T-90MS tanks in the next few years.

      Very good news for our defense industry.
    24. -3
      29 June 2020 10: 13
      The Jews probably have itching hands to bomb these plants in Egypt, but it's not Syria ... where you fly with impunity and bomb the sovereign state.
    25. 0
      29 June 2020 17: 16
      Quote: carstorm 11
      rather a very expensive service overall. Iraqis themselves simply cannot serve them even at the minimum level. only through certain structures. which means in a country in which wars and conflicts are going on complete insanity

      This was probably done on purpose. According to the old saying, "If you want to ruin a small country, give it a destroyer."
    26. 0
      29 June 2020 23: 21
      Sources from the Israeli Ministry of Defense claim that if this is a real deal, then this is a very alarming step in the aspect of Israeli interests.

      Cuming out from the side of the Jews - the assembly of abrams did not sadden them Here are those times. Those. Abrams didn’t strain them, how can they strain T90?
    27. 0
      30 June 2020 15: 52
      Interestingly, when the American tank "Abroms" was being assembled in Egypt, there was not a word in Israel that it was a threat to Israel, but it was only necessary to declare the intention to do the same thing, but with a Russian tank, it immediately states that this is a threat to Israel ... Hypocrisy as it is
    28. 0
      30 June 2020 17: 48
      Quote: Clever man
      So I’m thinking of buying a Passat B7 or, well, its ....

      This is about tanks, not your problem cars ...
      And the truth is said, about what, and lousy about the bath .... and here ... quite the coast beguiled ...
    29. 0
      30 June 2020 17: 53
      Quote: SU
      Egypt has not yet begun the assembly, and the Jews have already put in their pants?

      The Jews, as always, take envy to the very pamper .... here they raise panic and tantrum ...
      They dream of their Merkav to collect as much as that of Egypt ...
      Apparently finances do not allow to be deployed on such a scale of production ....

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"