Military Review

US hints to China that Russia does not target medium-range missiles at America

98
US hints to China that Russia does not target medium-range missiles at America

The United States hinted to China that Russian medium-range missiles are not deployed against the United States because they cannot reach their territory. As the US President’s Special Envoy for Arms Control said Marshal Billingsley, given Russia's withdrawal from the INF Treaty, Beijing needs to think about who these missiles are deployed against.


According to Billingsley, Beijing needs to join the Russian-American arms control talks, as Russia destroyed the INF Treaty by "deploying 9M729 medium-range missile battalions." At the same time, he turned to China, saying that "these missiles cannot reach the US territory."

Where are they deployed? Who are they targeting?

- said the US special envoy, adding that China needs to join the talks "to get answers to such questions."

For our part, we note that Russia's accusations of liquidating the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF Treaty) are not true. Russia withdrew from the treaty only after Washington announced a unilateral withdrawal from the treaty.

Earlier, Russia and the United States held consultations on arms control. Negotiations took place in Vienna. At the same time, the media convicted Billingsley of publishing staged photos from the negotiations. Reportedly, the photographs presented by the American special envoy of the US president on arms control issues showed not only the flags of Russia and the USA, but also China.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
98 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 27 June 2020 12: 51
    29
    The United States hinted to China that Russian medium-range missiles are not deployed against the United States because they cannot reach their territory.

    Divide and rule. Nice try. wassat
    not against the United States, because they cannot reach their territory.

    Duc, there in the West are a lot of their archers, who need to be counseled.
    1. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx 27 June 2020 13: 58
      20
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      Duc, there in the West are a lot of their archers, who need to be counseled.

      So in the east, Japan is not a "beloved friend."
      US hints to China that Russia does not target medium-range missiles at America

      Something they forgot to tell China that the Chinese INF will also not reach the United States ... belay
      However, both the USSR and the Russian Federation preferred to negotiate and made these proposals to everyone. By the way, China is the only country that, after WWII, attacked the USSR twice. And the world can only guess about the presence of a missile arsenal in this country.
      It was not the Russians who came up with the idea of ​​waiting on the banks of the river when the corpses of enemies floated along it. And the lack of real proposals from China in the participation of hostilities on the side of the Russian Federation and its allies does not mean the pure thoughts of the Chinese leadership ...
      In addition, some Chinese territorial ambitions and assumptions about Siberia and the Far East advise us to keep gunpowder dry.
      "American help" in all its glory. No.
      1. Shuttle
        Shuttle 27 June 2020 14: 09
        +3
        Quote: ROSS 42
        By the way, China is the only country that, after WWII, attacked the USSR twice. And the world can only guess about the presence of a missile arsenal in this country.
        It was not the Russians who came up with the idea of ​​waiting on the banks of the river when the corpses of enemies floated along it. And the lack of real proposals from China in the participation of hostilities on the side of the Russian Federation and its allies does not mean the pure thoughts of the Chinese leadership ...
        In addition, some Chinese territorial ambitions and assumptions about Siberia and the Far East advise us to keep gunpowder dry.
        "American help" in all its glory. No.

        Don't even try to grow your cactus of discord here, Mr. Good. A hole in the torus for you, not a military confrontation between Russia and China. And to you, and Mr. Billingsley in addition.
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 27 June 2020 15: 54
          +5
          The United States hinted to China that Russian medium-range missiles are not deployed against the United States, because they can’t reach their territory. As Marshal Billingsley, US President’s Special Envoy for Arms Control, said, given Russia's exit from the INF Treaty, Beijing needs to think about against whom these missiles are deployed.

          This eccentric, what does the Chinese keep for fools?
          What, China does not know how many American bases around Russia?
          Bases are the most good targets for our missiles.
          How many NATO bases? Britain and France, on occasion, than to thank?
          And this character understands everything very well.
          But still trying to fool. lol
        2. Ross xnumx
          Ross xnumx 27 June 2020 17: 11
          +8
          Quote: Shuttle
          Don't even try to grow your cactus of discord here, Mr. Good. Hole to you from the torus

          Insert your own cactus ... I’m talking about what really is. And all the "loyalty" of China was manifested in the recognition of Crimea as Russian territory ...
          Countries that recognized the peninsula as part of the Russian Federation:
          Nicaragua,
          Venezuela,
          Afghanistan,
          Syria,
          Cuba,
          North Korea,
          Sudan,
          Palestine.
          These states recognized the Republic of Crimea as part of Russia officially.
        3. businessv
          businessv 27 June 2020 17: 33
          +3
          Quote: Shuttle
          Don't even try to grow your cactus of discord here

          Yuri Vasilievich is not a botanist! He scribbled that there was never a special friendship, and this is indeed so. There is no contention, but there is no friendship in the gums, so please do not escalate!
        4. bayard
          bayard 27 June 2020 17: 44
          +4
          Quote: Shuttle
          A hole in the torus for you, not a military confrontation between Russia and China.

          Do the Chinese agree with you in your friendship outburst?
          What do you know about them and their plans?
          Are they ready to answer you in return, to such a noble impulse?
          My friends have served my whole life in Primorye, and they are by no means so favorably disposed towards our Far Eastern neighbor.
          And the simplest question is - against whom are the RSDs of China aimed / intended?
          How have they helped us over the past 6 years of our confrontation with the United States and the West?
          Or have sanctions piled on Russia worse than Europe itself?
          If a ram considers the wolf a friend, these are the problems of the ram itself ... but by no means the problems of the nature of the wolf.
          Read at their leisure their textbooks and periodicals.
          hi
      2. DenZ
        DenZ 27 June 2020 16: 18
        -5
        Quote: ROSS 42
        And the lack of real proposals from China in the participation of hostilities on the side of the Russian Federation and its allies does not mean the pure thoughts of the Chinese leadership ...

        It does not say anything. This is just your guess. We, too, somehow are not particularly eager to fight for all our allies in a row.
        1. Ross xnumx
          Ross xnumx 27 June 2020 17: 14
          +4
          Quote: DenZ
          We, too, somehow are not particularly eager to fight for all our allies in a row.

          And who are now interested in the allies of Russia? Tell me the name ... We are more interested in partners ...
      3. orionvitt
        orionvitt 27 June 2020 17: 05
        +4
        Quote: ROSS 42
        It was not the Russians who came up with the idea of ​​waiting on the riverbank when the corpses of enemies floated along it.

        Taking into account modern realities, such a variant of events will no longer work. If he declared his global geostrategic ambitions, especially having entered into a clinch with the United States, on the issues of economy, trade and political influence, it will no longer be possible to sit out on the shore. Let China be in the skin of the USSR, and feel all the delights of the Cold War. Or maybe, God forbid, and hot. So, "to eat a fish and ride a KAMAZ," the "cunning monkey waiting on the shore" will not work.
    2. Tatyana
      Tatyana 27 June 2020 13: 59
      +5
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      Divide and rule. Nice try.
      So, there in the West are a lot of their archers, who must be admonished.

      Absolutely right! I even remembered Ms. Merkel! Namely.

      During the visit of President of China Xi Jinping to Germany in April 2014, Chancellor Angela Merkel made a politically PROVOCATIVE present to him clearly with a hint. Chancellor Frau presented Xi Jinping with "the first accurate map of China," compiled in Germany in 1735.

      In 1735, China was the Manchu Qing Dynasty. The structure of the Chinese empire at that time included, in particular, the Far East, the Uryankhai Territory (Tuva), Siberia, and the South China Sea with all the islands.
      This gift literally blew up the Chinese blogosphere.
      Many Chinese bloggers thank Merkel for the gift and say that it is "more eloquent than a hundred thousand words."
      Chinese bloggers claim:
      - "Using the example of Crimea, Russia gave us a good lesson on how to defend our territories."
      “This card, which the Germans presented to us, speaks without a word about who our real enemy is.”
      “This map has everything we need, especially in the northern part!”
      “They simply told us directly that Russia took the most of our lands from all countries.”

      Merkel gave Xi Jinping a provocative map of China - Details - Inter - 02.04.2014/XNUMX/XNUMX
      1. DMB_95
        DMB_95 27 June 2020 14: 41
        +6
        In 1735, China was the Manchu Qing Dynasty. The structure of the Chinese empire at that time included, in particular, the Far East, the Uryankhai Territory (Tuva), Siberia and the South China Sea with all the islands.
        And in Russia in the 18th century was Empress Catherine2. Where is our map then?
        1. Achilles
          Achilles 27 June 2020 17: 16
          0
          Quote: DMB_95
          And in Russia in the 18th century was Empress Catherine2. Where is our map then?


          XVIII century characterized by the great activity of Russians in the Far East, which made it possible to discover, explore and annex new lands to Russia. In the years 1711-1713. D.Ya. Antsiferov and I.P. Kozyrevsky visited the northern islands of the Kuril ridge.
      2. Sergey39
        Sergey39 27 June 2020 15: 07
        +4
        The Ukrainian channel is a worthy source of information :)
    3. poquello
      poquello 27 June 2020 14: 08
      +3
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      Divide and rule. Nice try.

      Yes, not the first and not the last, and let alone the missiles then target many places with their own efforts, American and NATO bases and soldiers around the perimeter like dirt
    4. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 27 June 2020 16: 00
      0
      Tuk.tuk tuk- called tapped and .. farted in a puddle .. since medium-range missiles 9M729 are part of the missile brigade. Which is in the district (front) kit And nothing more
  2. rocket757
    rocket757 27 June 2020 12: 52
    10
    Lie more, maybe not a ride.
    Nothing changes in this world, certainly in politics.
  3. Observer2014
    Observer2014 27 June 2020 12: 53
    +5
    US hints to China that Russia does not target medium-range missiles at America
    And for that medium-range missiles. They are called medium-range missiles because of their capabilities. And it should be clear to everyone, without exception, why they are needed around the country. Where necessary. There will be a concentration of such missiles. Naturally, everything is within reasonable reasonableness . yes
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 27 June 2020 13: 11
      0
      And how long does our medium-range missile fly? Surprise for amers is not expected?
    2. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 27 June 2020 13: 18
      +1
      I am glad to see. Bogushevki.
  4. FenH
    FenH 27 June 2020 12: 53
    +9
    Marshall is in trouble with geography, Poland with Romania, as it were, on the other side of China. And American targets for missiles in Europe are enough
    1. aleksejkabanets
      aleksejkabanets 27 June 2020 13: 07
      +4
      Quote: FenH
      Marshall is in trouble with geography, Poland with Romania, as it were, on the other side of China. And American targets for missiles in Europe are enough

      I believe Russia will not yet deploy medium-range missiles in Europe. Although, the key word here is for now.
      1. FenH
        FenH 27 June 2020 13: 09
        +3

        12 thousand from Germany are moving to Poland, it's time to set goals for the defense of Kaliningrad
        1. Poetry
          Poetry 27 June 2020 13: 29
          +1
          Instead of Poland and Romania, two large nuclear funnels will remain, if God forbid, why ...
          1. FenH
            FenH 27 June 2020 13: 31
            +1
            In Romania, hell would it, but in Poland you have to gently hammer it, all the same Belarus and Kaliningrad are nearby, radiation to the borders do not care
            1. Poetry
              Poetry 27 June 2020 13: 35
              +3
              Romanians are generally unique creatures. They invaded us together with the Wehrmacht, at the end of the war they were on the side of the victors. Sorry. ducks of the highest category.
              1. aleksejkabanets
                aleksejkabanets 27 June 2020 13: 54
                +2
                Quote: Poetiszaugla
                Romanians are generally unique creatures. They invaded us together with the Wehrmacht, at the end of the war they were on the side of the victors. Sorry. ducks of the highest category.

                I was in Romania in the early 70s, people are like people. Judging the Russians by Yeltsin or Gorbachov, then who can we be called?
                1. Poetry
                  Poetry 27 June 2020 14: 07
                  +3
                  All the two-legged animals that burned people in barns were also in appearance - people like people.
                  1. aleksejkabanets
                    aleksejkabanets 27 June 2020 14: 20
                    -3
                    Quote: Poetiszaugla
                    All the two-legged animals that burned people in barns were also in appearance - people like people.

                    I was there as a child, more than two years old, I had friends and girlfriends there. On what basis do you call them "two-legged beasts"?
                    Looking at you, I understand how fascism began.
                    1. Poetry
                      Poetry 27 June 2020 14: 42
                      +4
                      On the basis of war crimes against my People in the territory of my Country, where no one called them.
                      1. aleksejkabanets
                        aleksejkabanets 27 June 2020 14: 50
                        -1
                        Quote: Poetiszaugla
                        On the basis of war crimes against my People in the territory of my Country, where no one called them.

                        That is, my friends committed war crimes in the USSR? You are raving. They were not born then. You do not see the difference between Romanians and Romanian fascists? Between the Germans and the German fascists? You do not distinguish between Adolf Hitler and Ernst Thalmann? Where did you study and did you study at all?
                      2. Poetry
                        Poetry 27 June 2020 14: 55
                        +4
                        If they voluntarily hung a target on their hump, placing a Pro in their place, then I see in them our deadly enemies, in which case strikes will be inflicted. Don't worry about education. And you forgive whose will you be? Whose hamster are you? State Department bibs? Or?
                      3. aleksejkabanets
                        aleksejkabanets 27 June 2020 15: 05
                        -4
                        Quote: Poetiszaugla
                        If they voluntarily hung a target on their hump, placing a Pro in their place, then I see in them our deadly enemies, in which case strikes will be inflicted.

                        In your opinion, if corrupt politicians behaved this way and not otherwise, then is this the fault of ordinary people? Would you like to take the blame for spilled diesel fuel?
                        Quote: Poetiszaugla
                        Don't worry about education.

                        I'm not worried, I've already seen your "education".
                        Quote: Poetiszaugla
                        And you forgive whose will you be?

                        Not yours, I have nothing in common with the fascists who call the whole people "two-legged beasts".
                      4. Poetry
                        Poetry 27 June 2020 15: 15
                        +4
                        The ancients said: "Every People deserves its ruler." As for the fascists, you're in vain. Two of my grandfathers fought against the fascist evil. We did our bit to break the back of fascism. At a personal meeting, I would explain to you: where is the maple, where is the ash, and where the hell is Uncle Vasin. I just do not want to be scattered and waste psychophysical energy on such an insignificant individual of the mind as you. If you have lived to such years, you are already hopeless. It remains only to sympathize. I will not answer anymore, so do not strain your mind, which you have is very meager.
                        Peace to you.
                      5. aleksejkabanets
                        aleksejkabanets 27 June 2020 15: 20
                        -4
                        Quote: Poetiszaugla
                        Two of my grandfathers fought against fascist evil spirits. They did their bit to break the ridge of fascism.

                        So what are you then, you can’t tell the hell out of a finger, insulting a whole nation? It’s not done, it’s wrong.
          2. New Year day
            New Year day 27 June 2020 15: 45
            +5
            Quote: Poetiszaugla
            All the two-legged animals that burned people in barns were also in appearance - people like people.

            what to do with it?
            The 118th Schutzmannschaft battalion and the SS Dirlewanger battalion took part in the burning of Khatyn. As you know, they were recruited by Ukrainians, Russians, Poles and representatives of other nationalities. In the Dirlewanger battalion, one company was manned by Germans, two by Russians and Belarusians, and a separate platoon was from Ukrainians.
            Be careful when cornering! There are no bad nationalities, there are bad people
            1. Poetry
              Poetry 28 June 2020 21: 31
              +3
              I meant all the nonhumans, regardless of their nationality, be they Germans, Romanians, Hungarians, Croats, Estonians, Latvians, Ukrainians, Russians or some others. I apologize if I did not express myself clearly.
    2. aleksejkabanets
      aleksejkabanets 27 June 2020 13: 38
      +1
      Quote: FenH
      In Romania, hell would it, but in Poland you have to gently hammer it, all the same Belarus and Kaliningrad are nearby, radiation to the borders do not care

      You talk so calmly about it, as if you are living on some other planet. Humanity is still unable to move to Mars, or to some other planet.
      1. FenH
        FenH 27 June 2020 13: 44
        +2
        Quote: aleksejkabanets
        Quote: FenH
        In Romania, hell would it, but in Poland you have to gently hammer it, all the same Belarus and Kaliningrad are nearby, radiation to the borders do not care

        You talk so calmly about it, as if you are living on some other planet. Humanity is still unable to move to Mars, or to some other planet.

        And why should I not be calm, this is not Russia pulling its troops to NATO borders, this is not Russia began building complexes in Romania and Poland, with which medium-range missiles can be launched, Russia has developed and created a missile capable of destroying these complexes, that's why I And about the use of nuclear weapons read the doctrine of Russia and compare it with the doctrine of the United States
        1. aleksejkabanets
          aleksejkabanets 27 June 2020 13: 49
          -1
          Quote: FenH
          Quote: aleksejkabanets
          Quote: FenH
          In Romania, hell would it, but in Poland you have to gently hammer it, all the same Belarus and Kaliningrad are nearby, radiation to the borders do not care

          You talk so calmly about it, as if you are living on some other planet. Humanity is still unable to move to Mars, or to some other planet.

          And why should I not be calm, this is not Russia pulling its troops to NATO borders, this is not Russia began building complexes in Romania and Poland, with which medium-range missiles can be launched, Russia has developed and created a missile capable of destroying these complexes, that's why I And about the use of nuclear weapons read the doctrine of Russia and compare it with the doctrine of the United States

          It’s not about who is pulling where and what, and it’s not about nuclear doctrine. It is only that the war, and even more so the nuclear benefit to humanity will not bring, and talk of nuclear funnels, instead of certain states, is at least wrong.
          1. FenH
            FenH 27 June 2020 13: 55
            +1
            Quote: aleksejkabanets
            Quote: FenH
            Quote: aleksejkabanets
            Quote: FenH
            In Romania, hell would it, but in Poland you have to gently hammer it, all the same Belarus and Kaliningrad are nearby, radiation to the borders do not care

            You talk so calmly about it, as if you are living on some other planet. Humanity is still unable to move to Mars, or to some other planet.

            And why should I not be calm, this is not Russia pulling its troops to NATO borders, this is not Russia began building complexes in Romania and Poland, with which medium-range missiles can be launched, Russia has developed and created a missile capable of destroying these complexes, that's why I And about the use of nuclear weapons read the doctrine of Russia and compare it with the doctrine of the United States

            It’s not about who is pulling where and what, and it’s not about nuclear doctrine. It is only that the war, and even more so the nuclear benefit to humanity will not bring, and talk of nuclear funnels, instead of certain states, is at least wrong.

            Do you think that the United States and NATO are pulling towards our borders, testing new nuclear bombs and missiles with a charge of lower power just like that, and they will throw Russia with dandelions and field daisies?
            1. aleksejkabanets
              aleksejkabanets 27 June 2020 13: 56
              -3
              Quote: FenH
              Do you think that the United States and NATO are pulling towards our borders, testing new nuclear bombs and missiles with a charge of lower power just like that, and they will throw Russia with dandelions and field daisies?

              Did I talk about this?
              1. FenH
                FenH 27 June 2020 14: 02
                +5
                Quote: aleksejkabanets
                Quote: FenH
                Do you think that the United States and NATO are pulling towards our borders, testing new nuclear bombs and missiles with a charge of lower power just like that, and they will throw Russia with dandelions and field daisies?

                Did I talk about this?

                Indirectly yes, since in order to avoid nuclear funnels on the territory of Russia, funnels on the territory of those states that voluntarily provided their territories for launch pads will be needed. And I mentioned the doctrine of Russia, so that you understand for what reasons this will happen
              2. aleksejkabanets
                aleksejkabanets 27 June 2020 14: 16
                0
                Quote: FenH
                Indirectly yes, since in order to avoid nuclear funnels on the territory of Russia, funnels on the territory of those states that voluntarily provided their territories for launch pads will be needed. And I mentioned the doctrine of Russia, so that you understand for what reasons this will happen

                I understand perfectly well that in the event of a nuclear war there will be many funnels, this is inevitable, I just do not see any reason for joy in this. That is what I wanted to say. After all, no one has ever relished the German losses in the Second World War, was not happy about the destruction of their cities, losses among the civilian population, this was necessary for the Victory, but not a reason for joy or pride. Here I am talking about.
              3. FenH
                FenH 27 June 2020 14: 19
                -1
                Quote: aleksejkabanets
                Quote: FenH
                Indirectly yes, since in order to avoid nuclear funnels on the territory of Russia, funnels on the territory of those states that voluntarily provided their territories for launch pads will be needed. And I mentioned the doctrine of Russia, so that you understand for what reasons this will happen

                I understand perfectly well that in the event of a nuclear war there will be many funnels, this is inevitable, I just do not see any reason for joy in this. That is what I wanted to say. After all, no one has ever relished the German losses in the Second World War, was not happy about the destruction of their cities, losses among the civilian population, this was necessary for the Victory, but not a reason for joy or pride. Here I am talking about.

                And where did you see joy in my comment?
                In Romania, hell would it, but in Poland you have to gently hammer it, all the same Belarus and Kaliningrad are nearby, radiation to the borders do not care

                Only an urgent need, but without any pity for the enemy
              4. aleksejkabanets
                aleksejkabanets 27 June 2020 14: 22
                +1
                Quote: FenH
                Only an urgent need, but without any pity for the enemy

                Here I fully agree with you.
    3. Egg
      Egg 27 June 2020 21: 56
      +3
      If the government of these countries is so headless that it agrees to make itself targets for nuclear warheads, then why should we shed tears for ordinary people and risk getting nuclear gifts from their governments? When the decision was made, ordinary people were silent, did not protest, this is their choice, so let them burn in a nuclear fire
  • zyablik.olga
    zyablik.olga 28 June 2020 03: 28
    +1
    Quote: FenH
    Instead of Poland and Romania, two large nuclear funnels will remain, if God forbid, why ...

    The optimal zone of destruction in a nuclear explosion is formed during an air blast of a charge at a height of several hundred meters. Given that in modern nuclear arsenals the power of strategic charges is 150-450 kt, an explosion at an altitude of 150-300 m will not lead to a funnel. No.
    Quote: FenH
    In Romania, hell would it, but in Poland you have to gently hammer it, all the same Belarus and Kaliningrad are nearby, radiation to the borders do not care

    Modern charges are relatively "clean" due to their high fission ratio. Most of the radioactive isotopes formed in an air explosion are "short-lived". They mostly rise and dissipate in the upper atmosphere without causing long-term contamination. The radioactive background in the surrounding areas will increase for a short time, but not critical.
  • tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 27 June 2020 13: 44
    +1
    Yesterday today infa Poland can fly over. USA Honduras pah, China is starting to bother. The East Pacific region is being considered for relocation. Poles are saddened.
    1. FenH
      FenH 27 June 2020 13: 48
      -2
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Yesterday today infa Poland can fly over. USA Honduras pah, China is starting to bother. The East Pacific region is being considered for relocation. Poles are saddened.

      For China, there are enough bases in South Korea and japs
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 27 June 2020 14: 22
        +2
        Americans believe that 12 against China will not hurt. Poland, let it figure it out. A pure Anglo-Saxon approach.
        1. FenH
          FenH 27 June 2020 14: 23
          -2
          Quote: tralflot1832
          Americans believe that 12 against China will not hurt. Poland, let it figure it out. A pure Anglo-Saxon approach.

          And to whom will they be hooked? Japas will obviously not be delighted
          1. tralflot1832
            tralflot1832 27 June 2020 14: 30
            +3
            I do not know with the Filipin from Subic Bey Americans, what is left?
            1. FenH
              FenH 27 June 2020 14: 33
              +1
              Quote: tralflot1832
              with Filipin from Subic Bay Americans that are gone

              It seems so, the Chinese are already trying to crawl there
            2. tralflot1832
              tralflot1832 27 June 2020 14: 35
              +1
              Looked South Korea and Japan. There are no other options.
              1. FenH
                FenH 27 June 2020 14: 40
                +2
                Quote: tralflot1832
                Looked South Korea and Japan. There are no other options.

                So, in Europe, land-based men were based, they seemed to have nothing to do with japs, but in South Korea they only tease Yuna. So, most likely, Americans muddied the water and would not withdraw troops from Europe, they would push them to tribal camps
                1. tralflot1832
                  tralflot1832 27 June 2020 14: 52
                  0
                  Maybe. Talk not bags to turn over. Where we will see when they will be in place.
  • Sergey39
    Sergey39 27 June 2020 14: 53
    0
    Quote: FenH
    12 thousand from Germany are moving to Poland,

    No one, no one leads anywhere. This is nothing more than a verbal internal showdown of the West. For now, anyway.
  • marchcat
    marchcat 27 June 2020 12: 53
    +4
    that "these missiles cannot reach US territory."
    One wants to say: how do you know, maybe we have magic missiles and fly there from where the threat comes!
  • Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 27 June 2020 12: 53
    +9
    What about American bases?
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 27 June 2020 13: 08
      +2
      They think that we think at their bases solid ecologists and astronomers. We may think so, but we keep the bases at gunpoint anyway, just in case. Scientists anchor them in the throat.
      1. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 27 June 2020 13: 10
        +5
        There Japan, South Korea, Thailand .... Qatar, Bahrain .... something else is. The Japanese have a powerful fleet.
  • Nikolay Ivanov_5
    Nikolay Ivanov_5 27 June 2020 12: 55
    +5
    The predictability of Americans has no boundaries.
  • Well done
    Well done 27 June 2020 13: 01
    +2
    As if China didn’t aim at us ?! Friendship is friendship, and ... It has always been.
  • Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 27 June 2020 13: 02
    +5
    Meanness in thoughts, actions and aspirations. Striped ears in their repertoire. Is China their enemy number one? Or is it their friend who is hastily warned of the insidious designs of another "enemy"? The lie has become global ...
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 27 June 2020 13: 12
      +6
      "Is China their enemy number one?" ///
      ----
      China has become "potential enemy number 1".
      And Russia is becoming "potential adversary number 2"
      This happened gradually during the international arms race.
      In Russia, the deadlines for the delivery of new equipment are shifted to the right, and in China - to the left, ahead of schedule.
      And over the years a new military reality has formed.
      1. Mountain shooter
        Mountain shooter 27 June 2020 13: 20
        +4
        Quote: voyaka uh
        In Russia, the deadlines for the delivery of new equipment are shifted to the right, and in China - to the left, ahead of schedule.

        Not all. And those, and others. It's just that in Russia, "suddenly" military equipment from the category of "cartoons" suddenly turns into the category of "standing on alert" ... The situation "wide open" in our circulation ended already 10 years ago, for sure ... Therefore, information on military equipment migrated to the OBS section ... Both the terms and parameters ... even voiced by high-ranking officials ...
      2. bk0010
        bk0010 27 June 2020 18: 21
        0
        Quote: voyaka uh
        China has become "potential enemy number 1".
        And Russia is becoming "potential adversary number 2"
        It's a shame, yes!
        And by the way, they are too optimistic about the fact that medium-range missiles will not reach the United States. They won't cover everyone, but Alaska and the Pacific coast may well. Moreover, a bunch of US bases around us should be "spud" with something. And we don't have enough aviation.
  • tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 27 June 2020 13: 04
    +6
    Do not set off, the Chinese are not stupid. Let the bases be removed first from our Far East. From the Philippines, South Korea and Japan. Then the Chinese can begin to worry and where the Russian missiles are directed. Now our missiles are directed to where.
  • Poetry
    Poetry 27 June 2020 13: 06
    +7
    Ask Mr. Billingsley to show China on the map. And we are friendly neighing over this spectacle. wassat laughing bully
  • Gorecc
    Gorecc 27 June 2020 13: 09
    +4
    Where are they deployed? Who are they targeting?


    obviously targeting India, Russia, Taiwan, South Africa, Japan and American bases in the region. China has no MRB in any way, in addition to the United States, it has a nuclear power in the north, and in the southwest there is also a nuclear power, with which there are now serious problems. Not to mention US satellites in the region. So the refusal of China from the brigade is something from the realm of fantasy, this will not happen, because it is a matter of their survival. The United States knows this better than anyone else, and nevertheless put forward deliberately impracticable conditions in order to then state "but we wanted, but they did not want to" smile
  • Topol M
    Topol M 27 June 2020 13: 17
    +3
    Here! What flight mission / PZ / will be introduced there and fly! You want around the area, but you want the target. I don’t know how now, but in my time 24 tape recorders were recorded in tape recorders
  • ximkim
    ximkim 27 June 2020 13: 17
    +2
    Yeah. .. business guys.
  • Sergey Averchenkov
    Sergey Averchenkov 27 June 2020 13: 21
    +4
    Here are the creatures ...
  • Yuri Stepanov
    Yuri Stepanov 27 June 2020 13: 38
    +1
    How are they all tired ....
  • Jack O'Neill
    Jack O'Neill 27 June 2020 14: 07
    0
    US hints to China that Russia does not target medium-range missiles at America

    I think that China is in the know.) Yes, and we understand that China did not target medium-range missiles at the United States.
  • lopvlad
    lopvlad 27 June 2020 14: 26
    +1
    Where are they deployed? Who are they targeting?

    - said the US special envoy, adding that China needs to join the talks "to get answers to such questions."


    it would at least have some illusory meaning if China’s armament mainly did not consist of medium-range missiles.
    The Special Representative of the United States, in his fabrications, proceeds from the fact that China is on the island and there are no more people around it for many hundreds of nautical miles, which makes it possible to say 100% that Russia will aim its missiles at China.
    And if we return to reality and look in that direction, then we will see there, besides China, also South Korea and Japan with American military bases.
    So the honorable citizen of the USA Billingsley in China, as one of our expressions says, "there are no bad people."
  • Prisoner
    Prisoner 27 June 2020 14: 30
    +1
    Here are the pigs! So they will spoof them.
  • evgen1221
    evgen1221 27 June 2020 14: 34
    0
    And the Chinese are such fools that it seems that after so many false statements by the states they will not be able to organize control with us? Or staff members from a puddle know better?)))
  • tuts
    tuts 27 June 2020 14: 39
    +1
    yeah, and we built the "power of siberia" so that the missiles would fly along the guides ;-)
  • Bat039
    Bat039 27 June 2020 15: 00
    +5
    In China, they are not stupid and are well aware that medium-range missiles of the Russian Federation are aimed at NATO military facilities (primarily the United States) in Europe. Including US missile defense facilities in the countries of the former Warsaw Pact.
  • tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 27 June 2020 15: 19
    0
    Not the topic. Today Gorshkov left the White Sea Base in the White Sea for the second time to fling Zircon.
  • Ham
    Ham 27 June 2020 16: 07
    -1
    such a clumsy and miserable attempt ... well, they would EXACTLY say the rockets supposedly are aimed at China!
    but how Zen propaganda ...
  • Old26
    Old26 27 June 2020 16: 11
    +1
    Quote: Bat039
    In China, they are not stupid and are well aware that medium-range missiles of the Russian Federation are aimed at NATO military facilities (primarily the United States) in Europe. Including US missile defense facilities in the countries of the former Warsaw Pact.

    What else would these missiles be found in Russia, capable of quickly and accurately hitting targets on NATO territory ....
  • APASUS
    APASUS 27 June 2020 16: 35
    0
    The US is trying to limit China in missile weapons at the start, anticipating that the Americans will soon be not up to the military competitions, China will do them in all respects in about 5 years
  • Fedorovich
    Fedorovich 27 June 2020 16: 49
    +2
    US hints to China that Russia does not target medium-range missiles at America


  • Tatyana Sementsova
    Tatyana Sementsova 27 June 2020 17: 45
    0
    And so that you can’t stop talking? Why is there where the states are, and there is constant lies? How tired of enduring these rash Anglo-Saxons!
  • Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 27 June 2020 18: 17
    +1
    How on whom? On European henchmen and US troops in Europe. And immediately their seats ached, they remembered how their Germans in the Ardennes were dryuch ....
  • Old26
    Old26 27 June 2020 18: 38
    -1
    Quote: To be or not to be
    Tuk.tuk tuk- called tapped and .. farted in a puddle .. since medium-range missiles 9M729 are part of the missile brigade. Which is in the district (front) kit And nothing more

    Interesting post. If it is true that the 9M729 missile is a medium-range missile, then it turns out that the US accusation that Russia violated the INF Treaty is fair and true.
    And the second one. So what if the 9M729 missile is part of the missile brigade. If it has a range of more than 1000 km, respectively (that is, it is a medium-range missile), then what changes if it enters the missile brigade of the district or army submission?

    Quote: Tatyana Sementsova
    And so that you can’t stop talking? Why is there where the states are, and there is constant lies? How tired of enduring these rash Anglo-Saxons!

    Well, the Americans are not so far from the truth. Even if we do not consider the 9M729 missile as a medium-range missile, then against whom then missiles from 3, 20 and 107 brigades are aimed. And if it is an SD rocket then 103 brigades?
  • Stealight
    Stealight 27 June 2020 19: 41
    0
    "Where are they deployed? Who are they targeting?"

    - said the US special representative "


    Against your satellites.

    , adding that China needs to join the talks "to get answers to such questions."


    This is for YOU, not China or Russia.
  • Charik
    Charik 27 June 2020 19: 55
    0
    "These missiles cannot reach the US territory." But they crumbled more than anyone else from these missiles
  • faterdom
    faterdom 27 June 2020 20: 44
    0
    As stated by the Special Representative of the President of the United States for Arms Control Marshal Billingsley

    Everything in the Marshals runs like a kid. Where is Trump looking? I would give the Generalissimo guy!
  • Old26
    Old26 27 June 2020 23: 54
    0
    Oh, the minus signers drew themselves. Knowledge is zero, but lulling rolls over ... Keep up the good work
  • aszzz888
    aszzz888 28 June 2020 03: 08
    0
    According to BillingsleyAt the same time, he turned to China, stating that "these missiles cannot reach US territory."

    Where are they deployed? Who are they targeting?
    Interestingly, did it even study somewhere? laughing A bowling ball looks much sharper than this Merikatos creep. laughing
  • Miron
    Miron 28 June 2020 03: 09
    0
    "The US has hinted to China that Russia is not targeting medium-range missiles at America."
    ***
    The US hinted to Russia that missile defense in Poland is not against Russia.
    And they hinted to China that he should provide a report on honoring the victims on Tian-Yan-Men.
    They generally hint a lot. Although then it often turns out that this is not the United States but a Russian stem.
  • VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK
    VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK 28 June 2020 07: 46
    0
    The world should understand that it should not give a damn everything that America said! They imagined themselves in America, the devil knows who. And the rest should listen? Pipes!
  • Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 28 June 2020 12: 11
    0
    NATO bases in Europe, US bases in Asia, British nuclear and maritime capabilities, key transport hubs in central / eastern Europe and others, other ..
    And yes, of course, some of these missiles are aimed at the PRC. Friendship is friendship, and what only God knows tomorrow will be.
  • Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 28 June 2020 23: 30
    0
    It would be better if their gayrope lackeys were reminded of the Russian missiles more often, and of the reasons for pointing these missiles.
  • The comment was deleted.